a

1. Cult film shocker Nekromantik to get UK
release after BBFC grants 18 certificate
Arrival of 'one of the most transgressive films ever' reignites debate about acceptable
limits for horror and pornography
• Scratch'n'sniff seats: can repertory cinema be rescued from multiplex hell?
Re-evaluated… 1987 horror film Nekromantik. Photograph: Barrel
Entertainment
Frankie Mullin
Thursday 4 September 2014 07.30 BSTLast modified on Thursday 4
September 201409.54 BST



 Share on Pinterest
 Share on LinkedIn
 Share on Google+
This article is 1 year old
Comments
42
Save for later
A well-timed wave of moral consternation can be a backhanded blessing for
film distributors but, at least when it comes to horror, PR-by-public-
outrage is increasingly hard to come by. Human Centipede managed it. Less
likely the upcoming release of Nekromantik, a cult shock-flick from 1987 by
German director Jörg Buttgereit.
Considered at the time one of the most transgressive films ever made and
banned in many countries, Nekromantik was never available on home video
in the UK. Now, Arrow Films is releasing the uncut version in November.
The film is also part of this year's Scalarama and will be showing at venues
nationwide during September. For all the girl-boy-corpse action, however,

2. it's unlikely many will quibble the British Board of Film Classification's
decision to grant it an 18 certificate.
"Unless we decide to do a cover-mount DVD on a tabloid, which will
obviously never happen, who's going to be offended?"says Arrow Film's
Francesco Simeoni.
Sign up to our Film Today email
Read more
The ease with which Nekromantik sailed past BBFC censors contrasts with
the battle Arrow faced last year over the release of anothervintage classic,
Radley Metzger's Score (1974). A whimsical, tongue-in-cheek jaunt through
the lives of two couples in an idyllic coastal town, Score is, in places,
explicit, but mainly it is humorous andself-aware. Metzger is widely
recognised as one of the most important film-makers to work in erotic
cinema – other films, Camille 2000, The Lickerish Quartet and The
Opening of Misty Beethoven are classics of their genre – and the director,
now in his 80s, has just had a retrospective at New York's ultra-
establishment Lincoln Centre.
Nevertheless, Score, in its uncut version, was denied an 18 certificate by the
BBFC on the grounds of an unsimulatedfellatio scene. After appealing to
the board three times, Arrow was forced to release a version Metzger had
previously cut for the more prudish states in the US.
Explicit … Lars von Trier's Nymphomaniac. Photograph:
Sportsphoto/Allstar
"The BBFC's decision was a big surprise," says Simeoni. "We expected Score
to go through. The BBFC classified it as a sex work, which means it's
designed to titillate in the same way as pornography, but the film isn't
porn."
Releasing an edited version of any film is problematic for distributors.
Works are tainted if even a few seconds have been cut, and with physical

3. media sales already on the brink and uncut versions at viewers' fingertips,
the UK industry can ill afford for films to be relegated to the R18 ghetto
(available only at licensed premises).
There are wider issues at stake. Julian Marsh, founderof the Erotic Film
Society, believes that while the BBFC is becoming more liberal when it
comes to violent and deliberately shocking content, it is as illiberal as ever
regarding works that are sexually explicit.
"Films which were once considered to have no value – or even capable of
corrupting – have been re-evaluated over the years. Nekromantik is just
one example," says Marsh. "But when it comes to films from the porno-chic
era of the 1970s and 80s, re-evaluation seems to have stalled."
Real sex … Michael Winterbottom's 9 Songs PR
For those who've seen Lars von Trier's Nymphomaniac, which is explicit,
albeit featuring porn doubles, prosthetic vaginas and special effects,
Michael Winterbottom's 9 Songs, chock-full of unsimulated penetration,
oral sex and ejaculation scenes, or Vincent Gallo's The Brown Bunny, with
its unsimulatedsex scene between Gallo and Chloë Sevigny, Marsh's
accusation may soundharsh. But what separates these films from Score?
In practice, the BBFC does allow unsimulated, explicit sex in 18-rated films,
but only if it decides those films are not sex works. If a film is considered a
sex work and features "real" sex, it will be banishedto the naughty step of
the R18.
"We define a film as a sex work if its primary purpose is sexual arousal or
stimulation," says David Austin, assistant director of the BBFC. "We ask
what the film-maker's purpose is in presenting sex in the way they do."
If the purpose is deemed serious, boundaries can be pushed. Hence the
BFI's compilation of Peter de Rome's pioneering gay movies was granted an
18 certificate, despite the director happily labelling his own work porn.
Some believe the fine line between a film about sex and a sex work is
illogical.

4. Unsimulatedsex … Chloë Sevigny and Vincent Gallo, stars of The Brown
Bunny. Photograph: Francois Guillot/AFP/Getty Images
"If an act in a film with 'artistic intent' is acceptable, why shouldthe same
act, depicted in a context that is just for sexual entertainment, be
considered less valuable?" says Myles Jackman, a lawyer who specialises in
pornography and obscenity offences. "It's cultural snobbery; the BBFC as
arbiters of taste."
Advertisement
In fairness, the BBFC does not operate in a vacuum. It has to abide by laws
governing pornography and reflects public opinion as best it can, carrying
out major public consultations every four years. If BBFC rulings then are a
product of social mores, as well as the board's arguably subjective decisions
about what constitutes a sex work, what does it say about us as a society?
Metzger and his legions of fans will baulk at calling Score a sex work, but,
even if the designation holds, is the intent to sexually arouse really so
troublesome? It's hard to argue that Nekromantik, with its visceral
grossness, sets out to satisfy the loftiest side of human nature. The
underlying ethos seems to be that, if something has been made with the
intention of being sexually arousing, it shouldbe treated more severely than
even the most taboo-breaking activities – corpse-screwing, for example –
when portrayed in any other context.
• Scratch'n'sniff seats: can repertory cinema be rescuedfrom multiplex
hell?