Case StudyTitle
and Year
Pro-active orreactive
Mediasector ComplaintUpheld?
Regulator
responsible
Statutoryor non (self)
Numberof
complaints
Regulatorpowers
KeyPointstowrite aboutfrom thisCase Study
1. Find5 Social/political factorseffectingthe Case Study
2. 3 Factors or debates surroundingthe decision - publicinterest,mediasensationalism,
discrimination,politicalpropaganda,demonisingthe vulnerable?
3. Media effects arguments/debatesthatcanapplyto thisCase Study
a) Hegemony
b) Scapegoating
c) Negotiated,oppositional orpreferredreadings
d) Moral Panic/MediaSensationalism
4. Effectivenessof OFCOMinprotectingchildrenandvulnerable - orprotectingsociety'smoral
standards
Discuss Conclusions& Write a 500 word Summary:
What isyour opiniononthisCase Study?What ISthe message/yourreadingof the programme
Why isit a regulatoryissue –what guideline orrule orlaw? Do youagree withOFCOMs decision?
Why didso manypeople complain –whatwasoffensiveandhow doesthisreflectsocial changes?
Who isat fault- Channel 4 as the broadcaster,the Producersof the show or OFCOM – whatare their
responsibilities?
Is thisregulatorstricter,more liberal orconsistentincomparisonwithothercase studies? What
conclusionscanyoudraw fromwhat we are tryingto protectsocietyfrom?
What political purposesmightthe programme have soughttojustify?
Is thisa typical challenge forOFCOMtoconsider - compare the MediaEffectsdebatesthisraisesto
otherCase Studies:CBBHomophobiaand WoolwichTerrorAttack
How didthe debate overthe complaints sensationalise the programme?Whatdoesthisreveal to
youabout attitudestofreedom,moralityandregulationof the media?
Summarise 3 thingswhatwe have learnedfromthisCase Study - whywouldyouuse it,what
argumentsor pointsaboutcontemporaryregulationdoesitshow?
Points/debates Why use thisCase Studyin
essay
What doesitreveal about
contemporaryregulation
Recommendation - would anINDEPENDENTregulatorforALL mediabe more effective inprotecting
the vulnerable?Whatwouldbe the negative pointsof doingthis?
Positive Negative

Case study 2 benefits street

  • 1.
    Case StudyTitle and Year Pro-activeorreactive Mediasector ComplaintUpheld? Regulator responsible Statutoryor non (self) Numberof complaints Regulatorpowers KeyPointstowrite aboutfrom thisCase Study 1. Find5 Social/political factorseffectingthe Case Study 2. 3 Factors or debates surroundingthe decision - publicinterest,mediasensationalism, discrimination,politicalpropaganda,demonisingthe vulnerable?
  • 2.
    3. Media effectsarguments/debatesthatcanapplyto thisCase Study a) Hegemony b) Scapegoating c) Negotiated,oppositional orpreferredreadings d) Moral Panic/MediaSensationalism 4. Effectivenessof OFCOMinprotectingchildrenandvulnerable - orprotectingsociety'smoral standards Discuss Conclusions& Write a 500 word Summary: What isyour opiniononthisCase Study?What ISthe message/yourreadingof the programme Why isit a regulatoryissue –what guideline orrule orlaw? Do youagree withOFCOMs decision? Why didso manypeople complain –whatwasoffensiveandhow doesthisreflectsocial changes? Who isat fault- Channel 4 as the broadcaster,the Producersof the show or OFCOM – whatare their responsibilities?
  • 3.
    Is thisregulatorstricter,more liberalorconsistentincomparisonwithothercase studies? What conclusionscanyoudraw fromwhat we are tryingto protectsocietyfrom? What political purposesmightthe programme have soughttojustify? Is thisa typical challenge forOFCOMtoconsider - compare the MediaEffectsdebatesthisraisesto otherCase Studies:CBBHomophobiaand WoolwichTerrorAttack How didthe debate overthe complaints sensationalise the programme?Whatdoesthisreveal to youabout attitudestofreedom,moralityandregulationof the media? Summarise 3 thingswhatwe have learnedfromthisCase Study - whywouldyouuse it,what argumentsor pointsaboutcontemporaryregulationdoesitshow? Points/debates Why use thisCase Studyin essay What doesitreveal about contemporaryregulation Recommendation - would anINDEPENDENTregulatorforALL mediabe more effective inprotecting the vulnerable?Whatwouldbe the negative pointsof doingthis? Positive Negative