More Related Content Similar to Rob Abels keynote at JISC CETIS conference 2012 Similar to Rob Abels keynote at JISC CETIS conference 2012 (20) More from Christina Smart More from Christina Smart (9) Rob Abels keynote at JISC CETIS conference 20122. Latest IMS Initiative:
Open Educational
Resources in the
Cloud via Wave
also known as:
OER-Cloud-Wave
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 2
3. News Alert: 2006!
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 3
4. Standards consortia
like IMS with a
membership model are
a thing of the past!
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 4
5. If it wasn‟t for SCORM,
there would be no need for
IMS!
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 5
6. Well, whatever you do
you better call it SCORM if
you want people to like
it!
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 6
7. Yeah, I‟ve been involved in
IMS and helped develop
specification xxx, that stuff
will never work!
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 7
8. You will never be able
to get dominant
suppliers to implement
open standards!
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 8
9. Ed Walker is the same
age as you Rob, all
that grey hair is just a
result of all the stress
of IMS!
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 9
10. The “Hype” Cycle for Learning
Tech Standards?
1999-2000
?
2005-7
1995-6
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 10
11. © Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 11
12. Are Education
Technology
Interoperability
Standards Creating
the Future?
Page 12
13. Agenda
• Is IMS work innovative?
• The challenge of interoperability standards
adoption in the education segments
• What we think we might have learned in the
last 6 years
• Where do we go from here?
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 13
17. IMS Mission Statement
The mission of the IMS Global
Learning Consortium is to advance
technology that can affordably scale
and improve educational
participation and attainment
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 17
18. Collaboration Across Stakeholders
Research & development
on standards &
interoperability
Acquire products adhering R&D Education
to standards to achieve Institutions
strategic goals
Education Institutions,
Districts, Systems Government
IMS GLC
Organizations
Mirrors The
Market Set standards to
Create and/or Ecosystem
adhere to ensure progress
standards to
enable market
efficiency and
opportunity
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 18
19. Are Education
Technology
Interoperability
Standards Creating
the Future?
Page 19
20. Are Education
Technology
Interoperability
Standards Enabling
Innovation and
Being Widely
Adopted?
Page 20
21. Innovation Scale?
A. Widely accepted, substantial improvement
B. Widely accepted, minor improvement
C. Somewhat accepted, substantial
improvement
D. Somewhat accepted, minor improvement
E. Not yet accepted, substantial improvement
F. Not yet accepted, minor improvement
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 21
24. Agenda
• Is IMS work innovative?
• The challenge of interoperability standards
adoption in the education segments
• What we think we might have learned in the
last 6 years
• Where do we go from here?
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 25
25. Interoperability Standards
are Widely Adopted When:
• Supplier Motivation is High, or
• Buyers Care and Their Bargaining Power is
High, or
• Both Are True
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 26
26. Bringing the Horses to Water
in Emerging Markets
Realization of
Market
Opportunity
or
Cost Savings
Opportunity
$$$
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 27
27. There Are Many Challenges
• Market opportunity: Generally
more prudent to invest in products
than standards
• Cost savings opportunity: You need
to invest first before realizing
savings
• Entrenched interests in proprietary
approaches
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 28
28. Attractive Industry-driven
Alternatives
• Google
• Apple
• Adobe
• Microsoft
• Amazon
• Other large suppliers
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 29
29. © Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 30
30. Consortium-Driven Standards
are Successful When
• Suppliers Believe the Market Opportunity is
Greater for Them by Cooperating with
Others, or
• Buyer Bargaining Power is High and Well-
Coordinated, or
• Ideally, Both
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 31
31. Buyer Bargaining Power is
High When Dispersion is Reduced
vs. vs.
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 32
32. This . . . .
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 33
33. „Checkmarks‟ Are Not Enough
“Vendors know the difference between clients’ asking
for standards “compatibility” in order to check off a
box on an RFP . . . that is why we must include true,
tested, guaranteed interoperability as a priority in
our purchasing decisions, and why we must pressure
our current support vendors to provide it as a
condition of their continuing good business relations
with us.”
-- Charles F. Leonhardt, Principal
Technologist, Georgetown University
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 34
34. Buyer
Net-Net
Enabling
awareness standard
& support that
delivers
Viable
Consortial
Standard
Perceived
market
opportunity Community
commitment
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 35
35. Agenda
• Is IMS work innovative?
• The challenge of interoperability standards
adoption in the education segments
• What we think we might have learned in the
last 6 years
• Where do we go from here?
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 36
36. Learnings #1
• Standards need to be shaped/adjusted
continuously by the practical and
entrepreneurial needs of the market
• Prime example:
QTI v1.2 QTI v2 APIP Future
the inevitability of e-Assessment;
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 37
37. Learnings #2
• Suppliers must have a motivation to adopt; the
motivation is always economic; voluntary
adoption is the best test
• Prime example:
LTI (Learning Tools Interoperability)
becoming the best way to integrate
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 38
38. Learnings #3
• Mainstream end-users have the most to say about
what is innovative in the end, but they are difficult
to engage in the beginning; ease of use is most
important factor
• Prime example:
Common Cartridge
national standards, OER, e-textbook
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 39
39. Learnings #4
• Education segment standards consortia can
succeed but they must be able to gather the
resources to catalyze all of the above and
most importantly deliver on interoperability
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 40
40. Buyer
Net-Net
Enabling
awareness standard
& support that
delivers
Viable
Consortial
Standard
Perceived
market
opportunity Community
commitment
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 41
41. How Do We
Do It? Annual Learning
Impact Conference
Large-Scale & LIA Awards
Adoption
Ed Tech Projects
Interoperability
Standards
Technical Adoption of Recognizing Impact on
Foundation for Innovation at Scale Access, Affordability,
Distributed Toward Strategic Quality of Education
Innovation Goals
Purposeful Technology Innovation Applied to Improve Education
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 42
43. Learnings
• Standards need to be shaped continuously by the
practical and entrepreneurial needs of the market
• Suppliers must have a motivation to adopt; the
motivation is always economic; voluntary adoption is
the best test
• Mainstream end-users have the most to say about
what is innovative in the end, but they are difficult
to engage in the beginning; ease of use is most
important factor
• Education segment standards consortia can succeed
but they must be able to gather the resources to
catalyze all of the above and most importantly
deliver on interoperability
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 44
44. Agenda
• Is IMS work innovative?
• The challenge of interoperability standards
adoption in the education segments
• What we think we might have learned in the
last 6 years
• Where do we go from here?
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 45
45. The Challenge & Opportunity:
Instructional Improvement
needs to be across all
This
implemented of this
While Doing More with Less . . .
46. The Sea Change:
Interoperability at the Core
of the Academic Enterprise
to Enable Efficiency,
Flexibility, Innovation, a
Better User Experience and
Actionable Data
48. Summary
• While there is still quite a lot of work to do . .
.
• Education technology standards seem to have
a role in creating the future . . .
• But to have a higher impact on innovation
going forward we will need (1) standards at
the core and (2) continued/more activism in
various communities around the world . . .
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 49
50. Thank You!
rabel@imsglobal.org
http://www.imsglobal.org/
@LearningImpact
#imsglobal
© Copyright 2012 IMS Global Learning Consortium
All Rights Reserved. Page 51