List from 1 – 10
1. Chanel Black Dress
2. Women’s suit
3. Sports wear
4. Lace
5. High wasted jeans
6. Athletic shoes
7. Fitted clothing (like the kardashians)
8. Yoga attire
9. Oversized jackets
10. Colorful shoes
BN208 Networked Applications
Prepared by Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Fariza Sabrina Apr 2018
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Unit Code BN208
Unit Title Networked Applications
Assessment Type Individual Assignment 2 (T1_2018)
Assessment Title Analyse Network Performance (Assignment Two)
Purpose of the
assessment (with
ULO Mapping)
This assignment assesses the following Unit Learning Outcomes; students should
be able to demonstrate their achievements in them.
d) Discuss performance and deployment issues for networked
applications;
e) Utilise appropriate industry tools and techniques to manage
networked applications
Weight 15%
Total Marks 50
Word limit 1000 – 1500
Due Date 1st of June 2018 (23:55) Friday Week 11
Submission
Guidelines
All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a
completed Assessment Cover Page.
The assessment must be in MS Word format, 1.15 spacing, 12-pt Calibri
(Body) font and normal margins on all four sides of your page with
appropriate section headings.
Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.
The report should be in MS word format submitted on Moodle on time.
Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration
Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer,
in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this
application three working days prior to the due date of the assessment. Further
information is available at:
http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-
procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
Academic
Misconduct
Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the
case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from
the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar
with the full policy and procedure available at:
http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-
procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-
Procedure.
http://www.mit.edu.au/about
http://www.mit.edu.au/about
http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment
http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment
http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment
http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/polic ...
List from 1 – 10 1. Chanel Black Dress 2. Women’s suit 3. .docx
1. List from 1 – 10
1. Chanel Black Dress
2. Women’s suit
3. Sports wear
4. Lace
5. High wasted jeans
6. Athletic shoes
7. Fitted clothing (like the kardashians)
8. Yoga attire
9. Oversized jackets
10. Colorful shoes
BN208 Networked Applications
Prepared by Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Fariza
Sabrina Apr 2018
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Unit Code BN208
Unit Title Networked Applications
Assessment Type Individual Assignment 2 (T1_2018)
Assessment Title Analyse Network Performance (Assignment
Two)
Purpose of the
2. assessment (with
ULO Mapping)
This assignment assesses the following Unit Learning
Outcomes; students should
be able to demonstrate their achievements in them.
d) Discuss performance and deployment issues for networked
applications;
e) Utilise appropriate industry tools and techniques to manage
networked applications
Weight 15%
Total Marks 50
Word limit 1000 – 1500
Due Date 1st of June 2018 (23:55) Friday Week 11
Submission
Guidelines
with a
completed Assessment Cover Page.
12-pt Calibri
(Body) font and normal margins on all four sides of your page
with
appropriate section headings.
3. listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE
referencing style.
on time.
Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a
Special Consideration
Application must be submitted directly to the School's
Administration Officer,
in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must
submit this
application three working days prior to the due date of the
assessment. Further
information is available at:
http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-
procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
Academic
Misconduct
Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the
seriousness of the
case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to
exclusion from
the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make
themselves familiar
with the full policy and procedure available at:
http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-
procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-
Policy-
Procedure.
5. Policy-Procedure
http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-
procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-
Policy-Procedure
BN208 Networked Applications
Prepared by Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Fariza
Sabrina Apr 2018
Assignment #02 Description
This assignment is design to develop student’s analytical skills
in addition to Wireshark
utilisation to capture data from live network traffic. Through
the labs, students have
learned how to analyse HTTP packets, TCP packets streams,
audio streaming with TCP.
Students have learned to identify the performance parameters
such as load distribution,
throughput graph, time sequence graph, flow graph and window
scaling graph.
Overview and General Instructions of Assignment
Students need to use captured Wireshark data to explain the
performance of the distributed
6. system behind the given web system.
Task - 1
From the (MIT lab Network), students need to chase and capture
three websites in the table
below (Table 1). Students have to analyse the performance for
each website in regards of:
The analysis of the performance requires screenshots of the
graphs and statistics
generated by Wireshark and the discussion of those screenshots
in detail.
Table 1: Websites, analytical tools/performance parameters
Note: You can also demonstrate other statistics that you find to
be significant for analyzing this
network
7. Task - 2
Investigate streaming audio delivery over TCP by listening to
Internet live radio and capturing
the transmitted packets. From a second network (Home, work,
etc.), students have to chase
and capture one more website which has an audio stream (such
as radio stations, e.g
http://www.abc.net.au/radio/listen-online ). Listen to the audio
stream for at least five
Websites Performance Parameters
http://www.onlinenewspapers.com/australi.htm
http://www.cbsinteractive.com.au
http://www.newspapers.com.au/
o Load Distribution
o throughput graph and
o Time Sequence graph
o Flow graph
o Window scaling graph
9. Description of the section Marks
Introduction
Complete introduction of the assignment
and outline of the report
4
Task -1
All three websites’ performance need to be
analysed and discussed in terms of:
o Load Distribution
o throughput graph and
o Time Sequence graph
o Flow graph
o Window scaling graph
The analysis must be provided in terms of
network performance.
10. 10* 3 = 30
Task -2
Analyse and explain the output of the
graphs for audio streaming website in terms
of network performance.
10
Conclusion
Write a comprehensive summary of the
findings in the report
4
Reference style
Follow IEEE reference style
11. 2
Total
50
BN208 Networked Applications
Prepared by Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Fariza
Sabrina Apr 2018
Marking Rubric for Assignment #2: Total Marks 50
Grade
Mark
HD 40-50 DI 35-39 CR 30-34 P 25-29 Fail
<25
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactor
y Introduction
/4
Excellent
introduction of
12. the assignment
and complete
outline
Very Good
introduction
and complete
outline.
Good
introduction
and somewhat
complete
outline
Brief
introduction
and some
outline but
there is room
for
improvement
Little
relevance
to the
assessment
topic.
Task-1
/30
Demonstrated
excellent ability
to analyse and
13. discuss
performance
parameters
Demonstrated
good ability to
analyse and
discuss
performance
parameters
but some
parts are
incomplete
Demonstrated
ability to analyse
and discuss
performance
issues with most
parts incomplete
Demonstrated
some ability to
analyse and
discuss some
performance
issues with
most parts
incomplete
Demonstrat
ed poor
ability to
analyse and
discuss
performanc
14. e issues
poorly
Task-2
/10
Demonstrated
excellent ability to
analyse and discuss
performance
parameters
Demonstrated
good ability to
analyse and
discuss
performance
parameters
but some
parts are
incomplete
Demonstrate
d ability to
analyse and
discuss
performance
issues with
most parts
incomplete
Demonstrat
ed some
ability to
analyse and
15. discuss
some
performanc
e issues
with most
parts
incomplete
Demonstra
ted poor
ability to
analyse
and
discuss
performan
ce issues
poorly
Conclusion
/4
Extra ordinary
logical and
convincing
summary of the
report.
Very good
logical and
convincing
summary of
the report.
Good logical
and convincing
summary of the
16. report.
Basic
summary of
the report is
given.
Argument is
confused and
disjointed.
Reference style
/2
Clear styles with
excellent source
of references.
Clear
referencing
style.
Mostly good
referencing style.
Sometim
es clear
referenci
ng style.
Lacks
consistency
with many
errors.