Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code .docx
Similar to Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code .docx (20)
More from aryan532920
More from aryan532920 (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code .docx
- 1. Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code BN208 Unit Title Networked Applications Assessment Type Individual Assignment #01 (T3_2017) Assessment Title Network Management and Services Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) This assignment assesses the following Unit Learning Outcomes; students should be able to demonstrate their achievements in them. b. Apply socio-technical contexts in modern network applications and management;
- 2. c. Utilise common and emerging types of middleware to design and manage networked applications; Weight 15% Total Marks 50 Word limit 1000 - 1200 Due Date 5 January, 2018 (23:55) PowerPoint demonstration during the lab time. Submission Guidelines with a title Page. - pt Calibri (Body) font and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.
- 3. a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assessment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment Academic Misconduct seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-
- 4. procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct- Policy- Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment
- 5. http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct- Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct- Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct- Policy-Procedure BN208 Networked Applications Page 2 of 4 Assignment #01 Description Instructions: Students have to select ONE topic each from (Table-1 and Table-2). Read four or more articles about each topic. These articles can be from the web, books or journals. There are numerous web sites available that discuss Network Management and Services. You are expected to list your sources of information at the end of your report. - Task 1 From Table -1, select ONE topic and write a report covering and detailing the areas to be explored including deployment and performance issues of an application, configuration issues, network
- 6. growth, centralized management etc. - Task 2 From Table -2, select ONE topic and prepare a Power Point presentation. The presentation should have at least 10 slides and students should present for 8 -10 minutes. Further instructions: - Do not copy and paste, all slides and the report materials have to be written in your own words. - Do not use Wikipedia as neither source nor reference. - Read 2 or 3 articles from the web, books, journals, etc for each topic then rewrite it using your own words. - Use IEEE style referencing, and be sure and properly reference any diagrams/ graphics. - Build on the topics that we discuss in lecture and labs in BN208. Submissions: Students has to submit only one word document on Moodle which includes task 1 and task 2.
- 7. At the end of task 1, copy the slides from task 2 and paste it into the same document then upload it on Moodle. Table -1 Choose any ONE Topic. S.no Topic Areas to be explored for a topic 1 IP Phone for IT Organisations nd related areas. applications. antages, disadvantages, remaining problems and limitations -technical aspects of such applications 2 IP Surveillance
- 8. Cameras 3 H.323 Signalling Protocol 4 Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) BN208 Networked Applications Page 3 of 4 Table -2 Choose any ONE Topic. S.no Topic Areas to be explored for a topic 1 Platform as a Service (PaaS) Explore Cloud Computing resources, Application Development, Cloud Architecture for PaaS, Service availability, Scalability, Deployment and performance issues, Centralized Management, Provide examples related to Networked Application Management (NAM).
- 9. 2 Software as a Service (SaaS) Explore Cloud Computing resources, Application Development, Cloud Architecture for SaaS, Service availability, Scalability, Deployment and performance issues, Centralized Management, Provide examples related to Networked Application Management (NAM). 2 Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Explore Cloud Computing resources, Application Development, Cloud Architecture for IaaS, Service availability, Scalability, Deployment and performance issues, Centralized Management, Provide examples related to Networked Application Management (NAM). Marking criteria: Example of marking criteria is shown in following table. Marks are allocated as follows:
- 10. Note: The marking criteria varies for each Assessment Sections to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Introduction Outline of the report (in 3-4 sentences) 5 Identification Areas to be explored for the topic 10 Reporting The quality of the report (style), images and diagrams Grammar and Syntax check 5 Conclusion Write summary of the report 5 Reference style Follow IEEE reference style for both report and presentation 5 PowerPoint presentation The presentation evaluation will be based on: - Quality of materials - Presenters knowledge of the topic - Time management - Level of clarity
- 11. - Level of organization 4 4 4 4 4 Total 50 BN208 Networked Applications Page 4 of 4 Marking Rubric for Assignment #01: Total Marks 50 Grade Mark HD 40-50 DI 35-44
- 12. CR 30-34 P 25-29 Fail <25 Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Introduction /5 All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated Topics are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly
- 13. presented. This is not relevant to the assessment topic. Identification /10 Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately. Clarity and supported materials for the technical content Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and
- 14. sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Reporting /5 Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing
- 15. Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed Conclusion /5 An opinion which can stand for scientific strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction
- 16. Argument is confused and disjointed Reference style /5 Clear styles with excellent source of references. Clear referencing style Generally good referencing style Sometimes clear referencing style Lacks consistency with many errors PowerPoint presentation /20
- 17. All evaluation points have been covered deeply one point was missing or has not covered Overall knowledge and presentation was above average Basic knowledge has been presented Poor demo. Shallow materials and knowledge.