2. 6 T h e R e a s o n
Workbook
p. 5
Introduction
In this section:
Expectations and
Objectives
Reflections of
Past Team Experiences
Discussions of
How Your Team is Doing
Biblical Foundations of
Teams & Teamwork
Differences Between a
Team and Any Other
Type of Group
C le a r
R o le s
In t e r d e p e n d e n c e
C O O P E R A TIO N
2
C o m m o n
P u r p o s e
1
A c c e p t e d
L e a d e r s h ip
3
E f f e c t iv e
P ro c e s s e s
4
S o lid
R e la t io n s h ip s
5
E x c e lle n t
C o m m u n ic a t io n
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r a t e g y
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r u c t u r e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e t h o d
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e C l i m a t e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e a n s
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
4. Workshop Objectives
By the end of the day you will âŚ
⢠Understand the principles and practices of
high performance teamwork
⢠Have had a lot of discussion about your team
⢠Have explored the characteristics of highly
effective ministry teams
⢠Have developed a plan for increased team
effectiveness
Workbook
p. 5
5. Sharpening Our Edge
âIf the axe is dull and he does not
sharpen its edge, then he must exert
more strength.
Wisdom has the advantage
of giving success.â
Ecclesiastes 10:10 NAS
6. Reflections
How effective is your team?
You mean on a good day?
Poor
Patchy/inconsistent
Probably average but nothing to write
home about
Good
Very good
We have redefined the standards for
cooperation and team effectiveness Workbook
p. 6
7. Reflections
How do you measure or evaluate team
effectiveness?
What was the question again?
Others tell us weâre doing a good job
Gut feeling
As a team, we talk about it on a regular basis
We measure effectiveness against specific
ministry goals
8. Reflections
Are your results measurable?
You mean, like with numbers?
No
Unsure
Some, but mostly not
Yes
Regardless of âmeasurability,â how would
you describe the results of your team?
Dismally
Poor
Poor So-So Good Very Exceptional
Good
9. Reflections
Whatâs between your team and exceptional
results?
Barriers within the team?
Organizational barriers?
10. TTeeaammss aanndd TTeeaammwwoorrkk aarree
BBiibblliiccaall CCoonncceeppttss
Godâs Nature
âLet Us make man in Our image,
according to Our likenessâŚâ
Genesis 1:26 Workbook
p. 9
11. TTeeaammss aanndd TTeeaammwwoorrkk aarree
BBiibblliiccaall CCoonncceeppttss
Godâs Nature
Godâs Creation Pattern
âIt is not good for man to be aloneâŚâ
Genesis 2:18
12. TTeeaammss aanndd TTeeaammwwoorrkk aarree
BBiibblliiccaall CCoonncceeppttss
Godâs Nature
Godâs Creation Pattern
Godâs Assignments
Moses and Aaron â Exodus 4:10-16
Moses and the elders â 18:13-24
13. You Cannot Do the Work Alone
âThe thing that you are doing is not good.
You and these people who are with you will
only wear yourselves out. The work is too
heavy for you; you cannot handle it alone.â
Exodus 18:17-19
14. TTeeaammss aanndd TTeeaammwwoorrkk aarree
BBiibblliiccaall CCoonncceeppttss
Godâs Nature
Godâs Creation Pattern
Godâs Assignments
Moses and Aaron â Exodus 4:10-16
Moses and the elders â Exodus 18:13-24
Davidâs band of mighty men â I Chron. 11:10
Danielâs friends â Daniel 1:7
Paulâs team â Luke, Epaphras, Epaphroditus,
Onesimus, Silas, Timothy, Titus
Workbook
p. 9
17. TTeeaammss aanndd TTeeaammwwoorrkk aarree
BBiibblliiccaall CCoonncceeppttss
Godâs Nature
Godâs Creation Pattern
Godâs Assignments
Jesusâ Team
âNow it came to pass in those days that He went
out to the mountain to pray, and continued all night
in prayer to God. And when it was day, He called
His disciples to Him; and from them He chose twelve
whom He also named apostles.â Luke 6:12
18. âThen He appointed the
twelve, that they might be
with Him and that He might
send them out to preach...â
Mark 3:14
19. Strategy of the Church
âAnd He Himself gave some to be apostles,
some prophets, some evangelists, and some
pastors and teachers âŚâ
Ephesians 4:11
FOR
ââŚthe equipping of the saints for the work of
the ministry; for the edifying of the body of
ChristâŚâ
Ephesians 4:12
Workbook
p. 10
20. âEquippingâ = Katartizo
To restore
a broken
bone
To
Restore
Something
To condition
an athlete
To mend
a frayed
fishing net
To
Furnish
a house
21. Structure of the Church
âFor as the body is one and has many
members, but all the members of that
one body, being many, are one body, so
also is Christ. ⌠For in fact the body is
not one member but many.â
I Corinthians 12:12-14
23. âNow listen to me âŚ.â
âThe work is too heavy for you;
you cannot handle it alone.â
Exodus 18:17-19
24. What makes a high performing
team different from
any other type of group?
Workbook
p. 13
25. Continuum of Cooperation
Synergy
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Exceptional
Results
Acceptable
Results
Low Moderate High
Grou Team
p
Workbook
p. 15
26. Synergy is a Biblical Concept
⢠âTwo are better than one, because they
have good return for their work.â
Eccl. 4:9
⢠ââŚfive of you will chase a hundredâŚâ
Lev. 26:8
⢠ââŚthe first slaughter which Jonathan and
his armor bearer made was about 20
menâŚâ
I Sam 14:14
32. Teams are Volunteers Who
Achieve âExceptionalâ Results
Exceptional
Results
Teams Groups
Acceptable
Results
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Volunteered
Compensated
A team is a group of interdependent
people committed to a common purpose
who choose to cooperate in order
to achieve exceptional results
Workbook
p. 17
33. Teams are Volunteers Who
Achieve âExceptionalâ Results
Exceptional
Results
Teams Groups
Acceptable
Results
A team is a group of interdependent
People committed to a common purpose
who choose to cooperate in order
To achieve exceptional results
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Volunteered
Compensated
34. Teams are Volunteers Who
Achieve âExceptionalâ Results
Exceptional
Results
Teams Groups
Acceptable
Results
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Volunteered
Compensated
A team is a group of interdependent
People committed to a common purpose
who CHOOSE to cooperate in order
To achieve exceptional results
36. âLetâs Talk About Itâ
⢠Have you ever experienced synergy on your
ministry team?
⢠What specific attitudes and actions promote
the potential of synergy on your team?
⢠What attitudes or actions hinder or block it?
⢠What are the spiritual dimensions of
synergy?
Workbook
p. 19
37. Where Is Your Team on the
Continuum?
Move Right
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
CCoonnttiinnuuuumm ooff CCooooppeerraattiioonn
ďś What determines where an individual is on the continuum?
ďś Why would an individual CHOOSE to move right?
38. Teamwork Takes More Than a
Good Attitude
Where We Stand:
LLooww HHiigghh
Level of Cooperation
Why We Stand There:
ď Willingness to Cooperate
ď Skill in Cooperation
39. LearnBack: Key Teaching Points
âŚBiblical Basis of Teams and
Continuum of Cooperation Model
⢠Teams and Teamwork are Biblical Concepts.
⢠We cannot do ministry alone (Exodus 18:17-19).
⢠High performing ministry teams are volunteers who
differentiate themselves by seeking exceptional results, not
just acceptable results.
⢠Cooperation is a choice . . . a choice made on an individual
basis
⢠Our level of cooperation is determined by our willingness
to cooperate, as well as our skill to cooperate.
⢠Synergy is evident throughout scripture (e.g., Ecclesiastes 4:9,
I Samuel 14:14)
41. Characteristics of Powerful Ministry Teams
Common
Purpose
Clear
Roles
Accepted
Leadership
5 3
Effective
Processes
Excellent
Communication
Solid
Relationships
Reason
for
Cooperation
Strategy
for
Cooperation
Means
of
Cooperation
Climate
for
Cooperation
Structure
for
Cooperation
Method of
Cooperation
1
2
4
6
Workbook
p. 23
42. C le a r
R o le s
In t e r d e p e n d e n c e
C O O P E R A TIO N
2
C o m m o n
P u rp o s e
1
A c c e p t e d
L e a d e rs h ip
3
6 T h e R e a s o n
E f f e c t iv e
P ro c e s s e s
4
S o lid
R e la t io n s h ip s
5
E x c e lle n t
C o m m u n ic a t io n
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r a t e g y
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r u c t u r e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e t h o d
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e C l i m a t e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e a n s
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
Common
Purpose
In this section:
The Attributes of a
Powerful Team Purpose
The Concept of Alignment
How to Create Alignment
The Mission of
Your Team
Workbook
p. 25
44. Purpose is the Cornerstone
of Team Effectiveness
Clear â I Cor. 14:8
Workbook
p. 27
45. I Corinthians 14:8
âIf the bugle produces
an indistinct sound, who
will prepare himself for
battle?â
46. Purpose is the Cornerstone
of Team Effectiveness
Clear â I Cor. 14:8
Compelling â Matt. 4:17-22
47. Purpose is the Cornerstone
of Team Effectiveness
Clear â I Cor. 14:8
Compelling â Matt. 4:17-22
Common â Matt. 4:17-22
48. The Source of Team Power
is the match between my
individual goals and interests and the
goals of the team.
âWhy should IâŚ.?â Workbook
p. 28
Alignment
63. Criteria For Alignment
Clear â âUnderstand Itâ
Relevant â âWant Itâ
Significant â âWorth Itâ
Achievable â âBelieve Itâ
Urgent â âTime is an Issueâ Workbook
p. 31
64. Sustaining Alignment . . .
In all things essential, unity
In all things non-essential, diversity
In all things, charity
65. A Team in Alignment
Neopolis
Samothrace
Troas
âImmediately WE
sought to go into Macedonia,
concluding that God had
called US to preach
the gospel
to them.â
Acts 16:10
Workbook
p. 30
66. Evaluating Your Purpose
Statement
Team Purpose:___________________________
_______________________________________
Clarity
Relevance
Significance
Believability
Urgency
Overall Motivation
Very
Low Low Average High
Very
High
Workbook
p. 31
67. LearnBack: Key Teaching Points
âŚCommon Purpose â our reason for
cooperation
⢠Purpose gives birth to the concept of teamâŚit is the
cornerstone of all effective teamwork.
⢠A powerful team purpose has three qualities: clear,
compelling, and common.
⢠Alignment is the source of team power. It answers the
question, âWhy should I?âŚâ
⢠Teams do not make the work easier, but make the results
bigger and better.
⢠âTask is Boss.â
68. C le a r
R o le s
In t e r d e p e n d e n c e
C O O P E R A TIO N
2
C o m m o n
P u rp o s e
1
A c c e p t e d
L e a d e r s h ip
3
6 T h e R e a s o n
E f f e c t iv e
P ro c e s s e s
4
S o lid
R e la t io n s h ip s
5
E x c e lle n t
C o m m u n ic a t io n
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r a t e g y
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r u c t u r e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e t h o d
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e C l i m a t e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e a n s
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
Clear Roles
In this section:
Evaluating Role Clarity
on Your Team
Different Types
of Team Roles
Managing Interdependence
Leveraging Roles Workbook
p. 33
69. Roles on your team...
⢠How would you describe the levels of role clarity on
your team?
In
Conflict Confused Roughly
Defined
⢠How clear is your role?
Mostly
Defined
Crystal
Clear
In
Conflict Confused Roughly
Defined
Mostly
Defined
Crystal
Clear
⢠How clear are you about the roles of the other team
members?
Havenât
a clue Very
unclear
Somewhat
unclear
Clear Very
Clear
Workbook
p. 35
70. Characteristics of Powerful Ministry Teams
Common
Purpose
Reason
for
Cooperation
Strategy
for
Cooperation
1
Clear
Roles
2
72. Different Roles
âThe craftsman encourages the goldsmith, and he
who smoothes with the hammer spurs on him who
strikes the anvil.â
Isaiah 41:7
73. Different Types of Team Roles
⢠Functional Expert
⢠Team Roles
â Formal Team RolesâŚe.g., Leader,
Facilitator
â Informal Team RolesâŚe.g., Peacemaker,
Gatekeeper
⢠General Team Member Roles
Workbook
p. 37
76. Characteristics of Powerful Ministry Teams
Common
Purpose
Reason
for
Cooperation
Strategy
for
Cooperation
1
Clear
Roles
2
Interdependence
Workbook
p. 39
77. Dividing the Task
Desired
Outcome
Role
#1
+ Role
#2
+ #3 =
Our Work Process
Role
81. Boundary Management
Managing the âWhite Spaceâ on Our Organization Chart
âYou what!!?
I canât believe this!
Now think.
When was the last
time you had it
in your hand?â
87. On High Performance Teams
No one is done until everyone is
done!
And to the Reubenites and to the Gadites and to the half-tribe of Manasseh,
Joshua said, âRemember the word which Moses the servant of the LORD
commanded you, saying, 'The LORD your God gives you rest, and will give
you this land.â Your wives, your little ones, and your cattle shall remain in
the land which Moses gave you beyond the Jordan, but you shall cross
before your brothers in battle array, all your valiant warriors, and shall help
them, until the LORD gives your brothers rest, as He gives you, and they also
possess the land which the LORD your God is giving them. Then you shall
return to your own land, and possess that which Moses the servant of the
LORD gave you beyond the Jordan toward the sunrise.â And they answered
Joshua, saying, âAll that you have commanded us we will do, and wherever
you send us we will go.â
Josh. 1:12-16 (NAS)
89. I Corinthians 12
There are different kinds of gifts but
the
SAME Spirit. There are different kinds of
service but theâŚ.
SAME Lord. There different kinds of working
but the
SAME God works in all of them in all men
now to each one, the manifestation of the
Spirit is given for the
COMMON good.
91. Complementing Roles
âBy design and by talent we were a team of
specialists, and like a team of specialists in any
field, our performance depended both on
individual excellence and on how we worked
together. None of us had to strain to
understand we had to complement each otherâs
specialties; it was simply a fact, and we all tried
to figure out ways to make our combination more
effective.â
Bill Russell
Workbook
p. 40
92. Drucker on Teams
âAll work is for a team. No
individual has the temperament
and skills to do the job. The
purpose of a team is to make
strengths productive and
weaknesses irrelevant.â
93. What are the principles for
leveraging the power in
role differences?
Workbook
p. 41
94. Leveraging Role Differences
Principles for leveraging differences
⢠Focus on strengths
⢠Staff to weaknesses
⢠Look to the edgeâŚ
⢠Read the book on everyone
⢠Proactively seek input
⢠Ensure enough difference and the right
difference
⢠Ensure ministry roles are gift-based
95. Gift-Based Ministry Roles
And He gave some as apostles, and some as prophets,
and some as evangelists, and some as pastors and teachers
. . . (Eph. 4:11 â NAS)
And since we have gifts that differ according to the grace
given to us, let each exercise them accordingly; if
prophecy, according to the proportion of his faith; if
service, in his serving; or he who teaches, in his teaching;
or him who exhorts, in his exhortation; he who gives, with
liberality; he who leads, with diligence; he who shows
mercy, with cheerfulness. (Romans 12:6-8 â NAS)
96. LearnBack: Key Teaching Points
âŚClear Roles â our strategy for cooperation
⢠Dividing the task into roles is the strategy for leveraging
the results.
⢠Interdependence and role clarity become critically
important when the task is dividedâŚunderstanding my and
othersâ roles is critical.
⢠Role possibilities include: clear, confused, and chaotic.
⢠Managing our interdependence suggests we need to master
role boundaries, role attitudes, and role differences.
⢠Teams need to learn the concept of personal responsibility
and mutual accountability.
⢠MY part of OUR job!
97. C le a r
R o le s
In t e r d e p e n d e n c e
C O O P E R A TIO N
2
C o m m o n
P u rp o s e
1
A c c e p t e d
L e a d e r s h ip
3
6 T h e R e a s o n
E f f e c t iv e
P ro c e s s e s
4
S o lid
R e la t io n s h ip s
5
E x c e lle n t
C o m m u n ic a t io n
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r a t e g y
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r u c t u r e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e t h o d
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e C l i m a t e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e a n s
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
Accepted
Leadership
In this section:
The Role of a Team Leader
The Mindset of an
Effective Team Leader
Releasing the Leader
in Everyone
Challenges to
Team Leadership
Workbook
p. 43
98. Characteristics of Powerful Ministry Teams
Common
Purpose
Clear
Roles
Reason
for
Cooperation
Strategy
for
Cooperation
1
2
Interdependence
Cooperation
3
100. The Matter of Leadership
How would you define leadership?
What are the qualities of an
effective team leader?
What are the qualities of an
effective team member? Workbook
p. 45
101. Teams Need Leadership
Without structure, groups often flounder un-productively,
and the members then conclude they are
merely wasting their time. The fewer constraints given a
team, the more time will be spent defining its structure
rather than carrying out its task .... In short, leadership
âthe existence of people with power to mobilize others
and to set constraintsâis an important ingredient in
making participation work.
Rosabeth Moss Kanter
The Change Masters
102. Teams Need Leadership
Without structure, groups often flounder un-productively,
and the members then conclude they are
merely wasting their time. The fewer CONSTRAINTS
given a team, the more time will be spent defining its
structure rather than carrying out its task .... In short,
leadershipâthe existence of people with power to
mobilize others and to set CONSTRAINTSâis an important
ingredient in making participation work.
Rosabeth Moss Kanter
The Change Masters
105. Characteristics of Powerful Ministry Teams
Common
Purpose
Clear
Roles
Interdependence
Cooperation
Accepted
Leadership
Reason
for
Cooperation
Strategy
for
Cooperation
Structure
for
Cooperation
1
2
3
Workbook
p. 47
109. The Role of Team Leaders
⢠Direction Setter
⢠Priority Management
⢠Facilitator
⢠Coach
⢠Boundary Management
⢠Coordination
Workbook
p. 48
110. Teams are Volunteer
Organizations
Exceptional
Results
Acceptable
Results
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
What we volunteer
Commitment
Leadership
What weâre paid for
Compliance
Management
Volunteers must
âacceptâ the
leadership before
they will follow
to exceptional
levels of
performance
111. The Mindset of a Team Leader
⢠They understand that teams are all about tasks
⢠They appreciate the collective brilliance of the team
⢠They believe in the power of diversity
⢠They see leadership as a role, not a position
⢠They see leadership and power as something to be
released and shared rather than something to hold and
control
⢠They support the task leadership and expertise of
others
Workbook
p. 50
112. Releasing the Leader in
Everyone
On High Performance Teams
Leadership is task-driven.
113. Teams have two
types of leaders
Team Leaders
Task Leaders
Workbook
p. 50
115. The Leadership Connection
SSeerrvvee
âWhoever wants to be
great among you must
be your servant.â
Matt. 20:26
Leader Team
EEmmppoowweerr
((ââaacccceeppttââ))
116. Servant Leaders Understand
That ...
On high performance teams,
leadership is a ROLE,
... not a POSITION.
117. The Mindset of a Team Member
⢠They understand that teams are all about tasks
⢠They appreciate the collective brilliance of the team
⢠They believe in the power of diversity
⢠They see team membership as a role, not a position
⢠They see leadership and power as something to be
released and shared rather than something to hold and
control
⢠They support the task leadership and expertise of
others
118.
119. Team Leadership Challenges
⢠Challenge for Position â Numbers 12:1-2
⢠Challenge to Direction â Numbers 14:1-4
⢠Challenge of the Concept â Numbers 16:1-3
121. LearnBack: Key Teaching Points
âŚAccepted Leadership â our structure for
cooperation
⢠Interdependence must be managedâŚwith divided labor, a high degree
of coordination and integration is needed.
⢠Leaders play the role of coordinator, integrator, facilitatorâŚthey
provide the structure for cooperation.
⢠Team leaders channel the efforts of the teamâŚlike the riverbanks of a
river.
⢠Leadership in its purest form is influence.
⢠Leadership is all about calling commitment out of others.
⢠A key role of the team leader is facilitating the constant change of
task leadership.
⢠Team leaders see leadership as a role, not a position.
⢠Teams empower the leader to serve them as they volunteer their
cooperationâŚthis is why âacceptanceâ is so important.
122. C le a r
R o le s
In t e r d e p e n d e n c e
C O O P E R A TIO N
2
C o m m o n
P u rp o s e
1
A c c e p t e d
L e a d e r s h ip
3
6 T h e R e a s o n
E f f e c t iv e
P ro c e s s e s
4
S o lid
R e la t io n s h ip s
5
E x c e lle n t
C o m m u n ic a t io n
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r a t e g y
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r u c t u r e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e t h o d
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e C l i m a t e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e a n s
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
Effective
Processes
In this section:
The Primary Types
of Team Processes
Mastering
Team Processes
Workbook
p. 55
123. Characteristics of Powerful Ministry Teams
Interdependence
Cooperation
J J
Common
Purpose
Clear
Roles
Accepted
Leadership
Reason
for
Cooperation
Strategy
for
Cooperation
Structure
for
Cooperation
1
2
4
3
Effective
Processes
Method of
Cooperation
124. Two Types of Team Processes
⢠Implementation Processes
â For example: Worship service, outreach event,
etc.
⢠Thinking Processes
â For example: planning, decision-making, etc.
Workbook
p. 57
125. Two Dimensions of Teamwork
TThhiinnkkiinngg TTooggeetthheerr
WWoorrkkiinngg TTooggeetthheerr
126. Thinking Together
Tapping into the Collective IQ of the Team
Divergence
⢠Explore the issue
⢠Define the problem or decision
⢠Surface difference perspective
Convergence
⢠Sharing
⢠Understanding
⢠Agreeing
General
Direction
Shared
Direction
CONFLICT
127. Thinking Together
Tapping into the Collective IQ of the Team
Meetings â
The playing field of a high performance team
⢠Problem-Solving
⢠Decision-Making
⢠Project Design Management
⢠Conflict Management
⢠etc.
133. Do our processes add value . . .
. . . or tax our efforts?
Time
Workbook
p. 58
134. Mastering Ministry Team Processes
Step 3
Feedback
Step 4
Implement
process
improve-ments
Watch
the
game
films
Step2
Design
and
Map
the
process
Step 1
Identify
key
ministry
work
processes
137. LearnBack: Key Teaching Points
âŚEffective Processes â our method for
cooperation
⢠Two types of processes: Working and Thinking
⢠Thinking together is where we often find synergy:
teams strive to tap into the collective IQ of the
team.
⢠Thinking should be made visibleâŚit often leads to
new insight discerned together.
⢠Meetings are the playing field for high
performance teams.
⢠High performance teams constantly tinker with
processes, believing that things can always be
done better.
138. C le a r
R o le s
In t e r d e p e n d e n c e
C O O P E R A TIO N
2
C o m m o n
P u r p o s e
1
A c c e p t e d
L e a d e r s h ip
3
6 T h e R e a s o n
E f f e c t iv e
P ro c e s s e s
4
S o lid
R e la t io n s h ip s
5
E x c e lle n t
C o m m u n ic a t io n
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r a t e g y
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r u c t u r e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e t h o d
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e C l i m a t e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e a n s
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
Solid
Relationships
In this section:
The Qualities of
Solid Team Relationships
Relational Operating
Principles
for Your Team
Workbook
p. 63
139. What aarree tthhee qquuaalliittiieess ooff ggoooodd
tteeaamm rreellaattiioonnsshhiippss??
Workbook
p. 65
140.
141. Characteristics of Powerful Ministry Teams
Common
Purpose
Clear
Roles
Accepted
Leadership
5 3
Effective
Processes
Solid
Relationships
Reason
for
Cooperation
Strategy
for
Cooperation
Climate
for
Cooperation
Structure
for
Cooperation
Method of
Cooperation
1
2
4
Interdependence
Cooperation
142. Qualities of a Solid Relationship
TRUST
⢠of your character
⢠of your competence
Workbook
p. 67
143. âTrustâ Account*
Deposit
Withdrawal
Balance
Competence Character
Do it with
excellence
Account Over Drawn
Do what I say
I will do
Account Closed
*Stephen Covey, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People
144. Qualities of a Solid Relationship
TRUST
⢠of your character
⢠of your competence
RESPECT
ACCEPTANCE
UNDERSTANDING
COURTESY/SINCERITY
MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY
LOVE
145. Solid Relationships
⢠The Principle: John 13:34
âLet me give you a new command: Love one another. In
the same way I loved you, you love one another. This is how
everyone will recognize that you are my disciplesâwhen they
see the love you have for each other.â
⢠The Practice: Philippians 2:1-4
ââŚ.Agree with each other, love each other, be deep-spirited
friends. Donât push your way to the front; donât
sweet talk your way to the top. Put yourself aside, and help
others get ahead. Donât be obsessed with getting your own
advantage. Forget yourselves long enough to lend a helping
hand.â
The Message
147. Team Operating Principles
⢠We treat each other with dignity and respect
⢠We honor our commitments
⢠We maintain confidences
⢠We check our âhatsâ at the door
⢠Silence is agreement
⢠etc.
Workbook
p. 68
148. âOne anotherâ Principles
⢠Mark 9:50
⢠Romans 12:10
⢠Romans 12:16
⢠Romans 14:13
⢠Romans 14:19
⢠Romans 15:7
⢠Romans 15:14
⢠I Cor. 12:25
⢠Gal 5:13
⢠Eph. 4:2
⢠Eph. 4:25
⢠Eph. 4:32
⢠Eph. 5:21
⢠Col. 3:13
⢠I Thes. 4:18
⢠I Thes 5:13
⢠I Thes. 5:15
⢠James 4:11
149. âOne Anotherâ Principles
⢠Be at peace with one another
⢠Be devoted to one another
⢠Be of the same mind toward
one another
⢠Build up one another
⢠Accept one another
⢠Admonish one another
⢠Care for one another
⢠Serve one another
⢠Show forbearance to one
another
⢠Speak the truth to one
another
⢠Be kind to one another
⢠Be subject to one another
⢠Comfort one another
⢠Encourage one another
⢠Live in peace with one
another
⢠Seek after that which is good
for one another
150.
151. LearnBack: Key Teaching Points
âŚSolid Relationships â our climate for
cooperation
⢠High performance teams are intentional about building diversity into
the team.
⢠Diverse teams embrace differences among the members, e.g., gifts,
skills, personalities, interests, etc.
⢠The work of ministry is all about collaborative efforts.
⢠There are two areas where we build or break trust: Character
Competence
⢠You do not build trust with a team, you build trust one person at a
time.
⢠I will not be interdependent with those I do not trust!
⢠Team Operating Principles govern our ability to relate to one
anotherâŚthey are a âtoolâ to ensure mutual accountability.
152. C le a r
R o le s
In t e r d e p e n d e n c e
C O O P E R A TIO N
2
C o m m o n
P u rp o s e
1
A c c e p t e d
L e a d e r s h ip
3
6 T h e R e a s o n
E f f e c t iv e
P ro c e s s e s
4
S o lid
R e la t io n s h ip s
5
E x c e lle n t
C o m m u n ic a t io n
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r a t e g y
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e S t r u c t u r e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e t h o d
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e C l i m a t e
f o r C o o p e r a t i o n
T h e M e a n s
o f C o o p e r a t i o n
Excellent
Communication
In this section:
Qualities of
Excellent Communication
Evaluate Your Teamâs
Communication
Increasing Team
Communication Effectiveness
Workbook
p. 73
153. Characteristics of Powerful Ministry Teams
Common
Purpose
Clear
Roles
Accepted
Leadership
5 3
Effective
Processes
Excellent
Communication
Solid
Relationships
Reason
for
Cooperation
Strategy
for
Cooperation
Means
of
Cooperation
Climate
for
Cooperation
Structure
for
Cooperation
Method of
Cooperation
1
2
4
6
Interdependence
Cooperation
156. Meaning Conveyed By. . .
Words
10%
Expression
Body Language
44%
Tone
Inflection
46%
Albert Mehrabian. Silent Messages,
Belmont, CA, Wadsworth Pub. Co., 1981
157. Qualities of Excellent
Communication
Clear
Open and Honest
Timely
Accurate
Workbook
p. 75
161. The Word of the Lord
âŚGod is all about communication!
The grass withers, the flower fades,
But the word of our God stands forever.
Isaiah 40:8
For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven,
and do not return without watering the earth,
and making it bear and sprout,
and furnishing seed to the sower and bread to the eater,
So shall my word be which goes forth from my mouth;
it shall not return to Me empty,
without accomplishing what I desire,
and without succeeding in the matter for which I sent it
Isaiah 55:10-11
163. Characteristics of Powerful Ministry Teams
Common
Purpose
Clear
Roles
Accepted
Leadership
5 3
Effective
Processes
Excellent
Communication
Solid
Relationships
Reason
for
Cooperation
Strategy
for
Cooperation
Means
of
Cooperation
Climate
for
Cooperation
Structure
for
Cooperation
Method of
Cooperation
1
2
4
6
Interdependence
Cooperation
Workbook
p. 81
164. They Speak with One
Language
And the Lord said,
âBehold, they are one
people, and they all have
the same language. And
this is what they began to
do, and now nothing
which they purpose to do
will be impossible for
them.â
Genesis 11:6
165. âLet Us go down there and
confuse their languageâŚâ
166. LearnBack: Key Teaching Points
âŚExcellent Communication â our means for
cooperation
⢠The biggest challenge to communication is the assumption
that it has taken place.
⢠Only 10% of communication is with words; 90% is non-verbal.
⢠Characteristics of Excellent Communication:
â Clear
â Open and Honest
â Timely
â Accurate
⢠Maintaining and sustaining purpose requires excellent
communication.
167. Progress of Team Development . . .
. . . not in one great step,
but a series of
mini-steps.
Workbook
p. 82
168. Characteristics of High Performance Teams
Common
Purpose
Clear
Roles
Accepted
Leadership
5 3
Effective
Processes
Excellent
Communication
Solid
Relationships
Reason
for
Cooperation
Strategy
for
Cooperation
Means
of
Cooperation
Climate
for
Cooperation
Structure
for
Cooperation
Method of
Cooperation
1
2
4
6
Interdependence
Cooperation
175. WILLINGNESS TO
COOPERATE
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
40
30
20
10
0
SKILL IN
COOPERATION
CONFUSED
CROWD
UNRULY
MOB
WARRING FACTIONS
ADOLESCENT
TEAM
BASIC
GROUP
LEARNING
TEAM
HIGH PERFORMANCE
TEAM
INDIVIDUAL
STARS
176. WILLINGNESS TO
COOPERATE
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
ADOLESCENT
TEAM
BASIC
GROUP
LEARNING
TEAM
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
40
30
20
10
0
SKILL IN
COOPERATION
CONFUSED
CROWD
UNRULY
MOB WARRING FACTIONS
HIGH PERFORMANCE
TEAM
INDIVIDUAL
STARS
177. WILLINGNESS TO
COOPERATE
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
40
30
20
10
0
SKILL IN
COOPERATION
CONFUSED
CROWD
UNRULY
MOB
WARRING FACTIONS
ADOLESCENT
TEAM
BASIC
GROUP
LEARNING
TEAM
HIGH PERFORMANCE
TEAM
INDIVIDUAL
STARS
178.
179. WWiilllliinnggnneessss
SSkkiillll
1. Looking at the âaverageâ position of your team on the
model, does this accurately reflect where your team is?
If not, where do you believe the team is?
2. How close was the assessment between individual
team members? If significantly different, why? What
differences in perspective/experience account for
these disparities?
182. Alignment of Purpose
⢠Whatever happens, conduct yourselves in a
manner worthy of the gospel of Christ.
Then, whether I come to see you or only
hear about you in my absence, I will know
that you stand firm in one spirit,
contending as one man for the faith of the
gospel.
Philippians 1:27
183. Alignment of Purpose
⢠If you have any encouragement from being
united in Christ, if any comfort from His
love, if any fellowship with the Spirit, if
any tenderness and compassion, then make
my joy complete by being like-minded,
having the same love, being one in spirit
and purpose.
Philippians 2:1-2
185. Alignment Between People
⢠âI do not ask in behalf of these alone, but for those
also who believe in Me through their word; that
they may all be one; even as Thou, Father, art in
Me, and I in Thee, that they may also be in Us;
that the world may believe that Thou didst send
Me. And the glory which Thou hast given Me I
have given them; that they may be one, just as We
are one.â
John 17:20-22
186. Alignment Between People
⢠Make every effort to keep the unity of the
spirit through the bond of peace. There is
one body and one Spiritâjust as you were
called to one hope when you were calledâ
one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God
and Father of us all, who is over all and
through all and in all.
Ephesians 4:3-6
189. The Challenge to Leadership
⢠Numbers 12:1-8 â The challenge for the
âPositionâ
⢠Numbers 14:1-4 â The challenge to the
âDirectionâ
⢠Numbers 16:1-3 â The challenge of the
âConceptâ
Workbook
p. 53
Legend:
=Questions which require feedback from
participants
=Put feedback on a flipchart sheet
=Indicates an important point that needs to
be emphasized
=Stop the presentation to introduce a
diagnostic instrument or exercise
=Denotes a break in the subject matter.
Introduction
Your Expectations
What do you want to get out of this workshop? What must we accomplish today to make this time worthwhile for you and your team?
<number>
Š
We have four overall workshop objectives that will address most (all, etc.) of your objectives. For those few not covered directly in the content, if time permits we will discuss them at the end of the session.
If I had to summarize the title of this workshop it would be âMINISTRY TEAM 101â. Itâs a survey courseâthe basic training in the principles and practices of high performance teamwork. Our training verse is shown on the facing pageâŚ
NEXT SLIDE
Read from slide.
On pages 6 and 7 of your workbook you will find a series of questions that will surface your experience with teams as well as a few observations about this one. Take a moment to answer these questions individually and then weâll discuss them as a group.
We are going to take the next several minutes to understand how foundational teams and teamwork are in Godâs plans and in Godâs work. Turn with me to page 9 in your workbook.
The concept of teams and teamwork flows out of the very character and nature of God Himself. You donât get very far into Genesis before you discover that God describes Himself in the plural. Then God said, âLet Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness;â (Gen. 1:26). Within the very first chapter of the Bible God introduces us to the concept of the Trinity.
Being made in Godâs image, man also was not designed to operate alone. (CLICK)
In Genesis 2:18 the LORD God said, âIt is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him.â This pattern of connection and community is woven throughout the entire fabric of Scripture. Creation wasnât finished until community was established (Gen. 2:24 â âFor this cause a man should leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave to his wifeâŚâ).
We find the same theme in the manner God designed His assignments for men. God designed us and He didnât design us to work alone . . . (CLICK)
Look at Moses when he first received Godâs assignment⌠âPlease Lord, I have never been eloquent, neither recently nor in time pastâŚI am slow of speech and slow of tongue.â God reminded Moses that it was He who made Mosesâ mouth and it would be He who teaches him what to say; but that wasnât good enough for Moses. He again asked the Lord God to send someone else (Exodus 4:10-13).
God was angry at Moses but persevered, reminding him of his brother Aaron and that he spoke fluently (Exodus 4:14). God assured Moses that Aaron would be a mouth for him and speak for him to the people, and that he (Moses) would be as God to Aaron (Exodus 4:16). (CLICK)
Moses again becomes a great case study for teams and teamwork when we later find him out in the wilderness, having led the people from Egypt.
Long before Peter Drucker, Lee Iaccoca, or Tom Peters, one of the first consultants, Jethro, saw his very tired son-in-law leading his people and his methodology prompted some very discerning questions. (CLICK)
Exodus 18:14. âWhat is this thing youâre doing for the people?â Jethro asked Moses. âWhy do you alone sit as judge and all the people stand about you from morning til evening?â
Moses explained . . .
Jethroâs response was direct, âThe thing that you are doing is not good. You and these people who come to you will only wear yourselves out. The work is too heavy for you; you cannot handle it alone. Listen now to me and I will give you some advice . . .â (Exodus 18:17-19)
You cannot do it alone! That is a thread woven through the entire Bible. Ministry is not only leadership intensiveâitâs team intensive. Regardless of the list of names of individual leaders, theyâre always surrounded and supported by teams. (CLICK)
One of scriptureâs greatest heroes, David, was surrounded by his team, listed in I Chronicles 11 (CLICK)
Daniel was seldom seen without his companions, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego (Daniel 1:7)
Paulâs team . . . who were they? (CLICK)
His team varied at times, but he was seldom found alone: there was a core team that assisted him in spreading the gospel among the gentiles. Paul stood at the center of a web of relationships that extended around the Eastern part of the Mediterranean and his fellow workers were constantly coming and going:
Luke âThe author of Acts and Paulâs âfellow workerâ (Philemon 1:24)
Epaphras â Played a significant role in reaching the Colossians with the gospel and probably Laodicea and Hierapolis as well (Col.1:3). Paul called him, âOur beloved fellow servant . . . a faithful minister of Christâ (Col.1:7).
Epaphroditus â A loyal companion and messenger who Paul described as âmy brother and fellow worker and fellow soldier, who is also your messenger and minister to my needâ (Phil. 2:25).
Onesimus â An escaped slave (of the Christian Philemon) whom Paul led to the Lord. Paul describes him to the Colossians as â âourâ faithful and beloved brother, who is one of your number.â (Col. 4:9)
Silas â a "faithful brother" (I Peter 5:12) who accompanied Paul through much of his second missionary journey, being with him in Antioch, Phillipi, Corinth, and Thessalonica.
Timothy â One of Paulâs converts (âI have sent to you Timothy, who is my beloved and faithful child in the Lordâ (I Cor.4:17). Timothy was certainly one of the best known of Paulâs teammates. He accompanied Paul on his second and third missionary journeys. During his last imprisonment in Rome, Paul summoned his spiritual child, although we are uncertain they were able to connect before Paulâs execution.
Titus â Another of Paulâs converts and good friend, Paul calls him âmy partner and fellow workerâ (II Cor. 8:23).
The Lordâs team. We know that Jesus was a man of prayer, often seeking out quiet places to speak to His Father. (CLICK)
But it is in choosing His team we have the only documented evidence that the Lord spent the entire night in prayer. (Luke 6:12)
His strategy was simple and straightforwardâwin them, build them, and then send them.
Leroy Eims, former president of The Navigators, tells a story he heard while attending a Christian conference that illustrates how vital Jesus' men were to His mission. The conference speaker shared that "When the Lord Jesus returned to Heaven after His resurrection, one of the angels asked Him a question: What plan do You have to continue the work You began on earth?â
âWithout hesitation Jesus answered, âI left it in the hands of the apostles.â Another angel asked, âWhat if they fail?â Again there was no hesitation, âI have no other plan.â"
Eims says that the speaker was quick to note this was only a story, but it got the point acrossâhumanly speaking, the future of Christianity fell on the shoulders of these twelve men, the Lordâs first team.
This brings us to the strategy and structure of the Church (NEXT SLIDE)
Few other passages define the strategy of the Church as does Eph. 4:11-12. It overflows with growth-oriented language. (CLICK)
It was He who gave some to be Apostles, some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be pastors and teachers⌠WHY? âŚto prepare (equip) Godâs people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ. Eph. 4:11-13 (CLICK)
This word âequipâ or âprepareâ is the key to this passage. Bill Hull in his excellent book, The Disciple Making Pastor, does an excellent job in explaining the Greek roots of this word.
In verse 12, âKatartizoâ = âprepareâ/âequipâ â In other settings it can mean (CLICK) to set a broken bone, (CLICK) to mend a frayed fishing net, (CLICK) to furnish a house, (CLICK) to restore something to original condition, (CLICK) to condition an athlete.
Used in II Timothy 3:17, in means âequipped.â In Luke 6:40, it is translated âfully taught.â
âPreparingâ people for work of service means more than teaching the Bible and meeting with one or two interested growers.
Setting a broken bone implies helping broken people put
their lives back together.
Furnishing a house communicates the development of
people.
Training an athlete means providing the necessary
challenges to prepare someone to effectively
compete in the front lines of ministry.
THIS IS WHY ONE PERSON CANâT DO IT ALONE!
Structure follows strategy, and no passage of scripture better illustrates the structure of the Church than I Cor. 12. It describes the inter-workings of the church.
⢠Inter-dependent parts
⢠Synergistically related
⢠Biblically directed
⢠Spiritually empowered
Such a structure allows no other alternative than intense and effective collaboration. Thatâs the premiseâGodâs work is a team effort.
We can summarize our description of the Church as being composed of INTERDEPENDENT PARTS, (CLICK) SYNERGISTICALLY RELATED, (CLICK) BIBLICALLY DIRECTED (CLICK) , SPIRITUALLY EMPOWERED (CLICK) âŚ.
Jethro had it right ⌠(CLICK) âWe cannot do ministry alone.â
Actually, any type of group can have these attributes. Teams have them to a higher degree and they are rewarded with exceptionally higher levels of results. Itâs the results that sets a team apart from any other type of group.
We often describe the level of results achieved by teams as being synergistic. This slide reminds us that cooperation is really a continuum (CLICK). Itâs not an âonâ or âoffâ concept (CLICK) but rather a matter of degree. We can have low levels of cooperation, moderate levels, high levels, or anything in between.
(CLICK) Common sense tells us that the higher the level of cooperation, the higher the results⌠(CLICK) Groups typically realize âadditiveâ results 1+1=2.
(CLICK) At a certain level of cooperation we start getting more in results than we are investing in effort. (CLICK) These are âexceptional resultsâ â (CLICK - CLICK), results we call synergistic. 1+1=3, 4, âŚeven 5!
(CLICK) Groups achieve additive results. Thatâs âacceptableâ in most instances, unless youâre in a situation where âexceptionalâ results make a difference. (CLICK) Then you must rely on a team.
God demands men team up on His tasks for good reasonâit works better that way. The results are bigger. When Jonathan told his armor bearer they were to attack a superior force of Philistines, he observed, âThe Lord is not restrained to save by many or by few.â However, you donât get very far into scripture before you realize He tends to prefer to save by few. With God the primary assets are not resources but rather resourcefulness, faith, the power of His Spirit, and a lot of cooperation.
In Zechariah 4:6 God reminds us that it is ânot by might nor by power but by My Spirit.â (Also Psalm 33:13-22)
Ecclesiastes sums it up well â âTwo are better than one, because they have good return for their work. If one falls down, his friend can help him up. But pity the man who falls and has no one to help him up! Also, if two lie down together, they will keep him up! Also, if two lie down together, they will keep warm. How can one keep warm alone? Though one may be over-powered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands is not quickly broken.â (CLICK)
We find plenty of evidence in scripture that when people team up with each other and with God, the results are truly âexceptionalââwhether they are building ⌠(NEXT SLIDE)
an Ark . . .
an Army . . .
or a Wall.
S. D. Gordon said it well (PAGE 18 IN YOUR WORKBOOKS) âCooperation increases efficiency in amazing proportions. Two working together in perfect agreement have five-fold the efficiency of the same two working separately. The united church would be an unconquerable church. But the moment cooperation is sacrificed as an essential, real power is at the disappearing point.â
We find many illustrations of synergy in nature â
Alloys â Composite is stronger than the individual elements.
Salt â Synergistic combination of two highly poisonous elements, sodium and chlorine.
We see another example of synergy with geese. As each goose flaps its wings, it creates an âupliftâ for the birds that follow. By flying in a âVâ formation, the whole flock adds 71% greater flying range than if each bird flew alone.
Lesson: People who share a common direction and sense of community can get where they are going quicker and easier because they are traveling on the trust of one another.
When a goose falls out of the formation, it suddenly feels the drag and resistance of flying alone. It quickly moves back into formation to take advantage of the lifting power of the bird immediately in front of it.
If we have as much sense as a goose, we stay in formation with those headed where we want to go. We are willing to accept their help and give help to others.
Exceptional Results are a product of extraordinary levels of commitment, collaboration, and creativity. These attributes are motivated by choice, not by compliance. Cooperation is a choice. Thus, teams, in the very truest sense, are volunteers.
It is from this insight that we can craft our definition of a team â (NEXT SLIDE)
There are a number of key words in this definition ⌠but the most significant in regards to our current point is ...(NEXT SLIDE)
âChooseâ ⌠Thatâs the volunteer part. We pay people for acceptable results. âA fair dayâs wages for a fair dayâs work.â But they volunteer anything above that.
Always remember that cooperation is a choiceâa choice made on an individual basis. Weâll explore this in more detail later in the day.
Because the continuum of cooperation is a choice, we can have positive and negative levels of cooperation. (CLICK) Negative or low levels of cooperation could be a result of:
Low levels of competence (CLICK)
Wrong team composition (CLICK)
High levels of internal competition (CLICK)
Low levels of commitment (CLICK)
Team leaders can address the first two issues by finding the skills needed or by re-composing the team. The last two issues are based on an individualâs choice.
- OR -
Over the next few hours we are going to explore the characteristics of a team that can achieve exceptional ministry results.
The continuum surfaces two key issues about teams and teamwork â First, (CLICK) Where we standâŚ.
Secondly, (CLICK) why we stand in one particular place. Over the years we have asked thousands of staff and executives where their team stood on the continuum and as they told us they invariably explained why individuals stood one place or another. Whatever the specific reasons, they could all be organized into two buckets:
(CLICK) â Their willingness to cooperate and (CLICK) their skill in cooperation.
NOTE TO FACILITATOR: The purpose of this hidden slide is to mark where you would insert Team Profile slides and exercise should you choose to use them. They are the nine (9) slides immediately following the Finis slide in this presentation.
Weâve found that, invariably, high performance teams have very similar and consistent characteristics.
Over the next few hours I will introduce you to the 84 characteristics of an effective team . . . just kidding!
Our list is much shorter. In fact, it contains only six qualities. Being so short, each characteristic is critically important. If one is missing or inadequate, the team is, at best, limping. If two or three are missing, it may not be a team at all.
Iâm going to use a diagram to list my characteristics. We call it the Team Wheel. It will give you a conceptual framework around which to organize your thoughts while, at the same time, showing you how each characteristic relates to the other.
Letâs start by exploring FOUR important dimensions of Team Purpose.
We begin with PURPOSE, for it is the cornerstone of all effective teamwork. It is purpose that gives birth to the concept of team in the first place. Purpose is the motivation for the existence of the team. It is the magnet that both calls and holds the team together. Purpose answers the question: âWhy?â Why are we in existence? Remember, cooperation is a choiceâpurpose provides reason for making that choice. The biggest reason for lack of teamwork (remember, itâs hard work) is an insufficient answer to the question: âWhy should we?ââŚShould we what?âŚCOOPERATE!!
The answer to this question, âWhy should we cooperate?â is: to do something. And that something is bigger than any of us could do alone. That something is an outcome which I, as an individual, want but am incapable of achieving on my own. Therefore, I must âteam upâ with others to get the job done.
A powerful team purpose has three qualities: (NEXT SLIDE)
First, it must be CLEARâpeople wonât sacrifice themselves for a confused, mushy mission. Too many leaders assume that because the task is crystal clear to them, it must be just as clear to others. âCanât they see that . . . ?â Paul reminds us of that in I Cor. 14:8.
Read off of slide.
Secondly, a powerful team purpose is COMPELLING. (CLICK) Look at the response of the disciples when Jesus called them to ministryâthey immediately left whatever they were doing and followed Him.
17. From that time Jesus began to preach and say, âRepent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.â 18. And walking by the Sea of Galilee, He saw two brothers, Simon who was called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea; for they were fishermen. 19. And He said to them, âFollow Me, and I will make you fishers of men.â 20. And they immediately left the nets, and followed Him. 21. And going on from there He saw two other brothers, James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother, in the boat with Zebedee their father, mending their nets; and He called them. 22. And they immediately left the boat and their father, and followed Him.
Matthew 4:17-22 (NAS)
As you read the book of John, you realize that this was not their first exposure to Jesus. They had had the opportunity to be with Him a bit. In that period of time they had become captured by His character and the compelling nature of His call to mission.
Finally, purpose must be COMMON.
Every member of the team must see it as important. In this same passage (Matthew 4:17-22) we see that the attraction of this team purpose was broadly heldâPeter and Andrew both left their nets, John and James walked away from their families and boats. They all felt the tug of the call. It was the type of purpose that speaks to the hearts of men. It wakes up a resident need, aspiration, or hope.
The power of purpose in a team setting flows out of the concept of âalignment.â
Alignment is the match between my individual goals or purposes and that of the teamâs. It is the answer to this key question: Why should I? (CLICK)
Alignment occurs when individuals perceive that contributing to an organization or team produces a direct contribution to their personal mission.
The individual wants the team to succeed because it provides the context for his or her own personal achievement.
People in a boat is a good metaphor to illustrate this important concept.
Youâll find this diagram on page 28 in your workbook.
(NEXT SLIDE)
Here we see our team in the boat, heading for the purpose.
Team and individual goals in alignment, everyone is pointing in the same direction toward the team goal. (CLICK)
The most productive team is one in which every member (and their purpose) is important, and in which every member is committed to the common mission of the team. If the team wins, they win!
Here we see a team not in alignment with the team goal. The direction of the individual arrows indicate everyone is heading in a different direction. (CLICK)
In this situation, instead of pulling together as a team, each member is throwing his/her shoulder behind a different strategy or different direction. Sometimes it is only a small difference; other times itâs in the total opposite direction.
If this continues unabated, the results are often disastrous for the team.
Here, alignment between individual members and the team has become so out of whack that the team itself is thrown off of its purpose.
When a team is in alignment we can say they are in the same boat, heading in the same direction, and pulling together.
When we lose that sense of alignment, things can become chaotic as team members begin to do their own thing.
Hereâs a case of lack of alignment. Which individual is going to cause the most problems?
Actually, its #2.
Itâs not #5 or #6. Certainly they are out of alignment, but they are so clearly out of alignment that no one (not even they themselves) is unclear about it.
Either they will jump off . . . (NEXT SLIDE)
. . . or we will throw them off.
But #2, who is just slightly out of alignment, will spend his or her creative energies trying to get us to change course.
Meetings take a little longer.
Consensus comes harder.
Conflict is a little hotter.
We can summarize this entire issue of alignment with the word âcommon.â Purpose is not sufficient in itselfâthere must be unity of purpose among all the team members.
To accomplish that, team leaders must convince individual team members that the team purpose has the following attributes:
1. Clear â Weâve already covered this. The key issue is that team
members understand it.
2. Relevant â Iâve got to want it.
3. Significant â By this, I mean worth it. It may be relevant, but not
enough it to make it worth the effort.
4. Achievable â This is the issue of believability.
Significant and Achievable are very closely related. On one hand our goals must be big enough to be worth a team effort; but on the other, not so big that they arenât believable.
Teamwork is WORK. HARD WORK! (CLICK) Teams donât make the work easier, but make the results bigger and better. (CLICK)
The challenge is to balance the âSignificantâ and âAchievableâ dimensions of the team task. If the task is too big, the team members wonât believe it can be done and therefore will probably not âvolunteerâ exceptional levels of commitment to its accomplishment.
If it is too small, it wonât be worth the teamWORK. Again, there wonât be a high level of âvolunteerismâ on your team.
The key point here is not to chase group-sized goals with team-sized efforts.
âSome years ago a headline told of 300 whales which suddenly died. The whales were pursuing sardines and found themselves marooned in a bay. Frederick Brown Harris commented, âThe small fish lured the sea giants to their death ⌠They came to their violent demise by chasing small ends, by prostituting vast powers for insignificant goals.â*
Finally, âŚ.(Next slide)
* Source unknown.
Finally, our purpose must be urgentâtime is important. All of us have important long-term goals on our to-do list: a book to write, a relationship to build, a marathon to runâgreat goals, relevant, significant, clearâbut not urgent. You get my point.
I can tell this is too convicting. Letâs move on.
We can sum this topic up with an old Anglican proverb:
In all things essential, unity
In all things non-essential, diversity
In all things, charity.
An excellent biblical illustration of alignment (sticking with our boat metaphor) is found in Acts 16, verse 10: (CLICK)
Paul and his team had set out for Bithynia but found themselves thwarted by the Holy Spirit. God was about to give them new marching orders â
9 And a vision appeared to Paul in the night: a certain man of Macedonia was standing and appealing to him, and saying, âCome over to Macedonia and help us.â (CLICK)
10 And when he had seen the vision, immediately we sought to go into Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel to them.
11 Therefore putting out to sea from Troas, we ran a straight course to Samothrace, and on the day following to Neopolis;
12 and from there to Philippi, which is a leading city of the district of Macedonia, a Roman colony; and we were staying in this city for some days.
Acts 16:9-12 (NAS)
Look at the reaction of the team when Paul shares with them Godâs visionââImmediately we sought to goâ writes Luke, âconcluding God had called us . . .â They didnât dilly-dally along the way either. Luke explains that they âran a straight course . . .â This was a team that had alignment of purpose. The Lord communicated the consequences when there is lack of alignment or unity in Mark 3, when Scribes attributed the source of His power to Satan.
âAnd if a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand. And if a house is divided against itself, that house will not be able to stand.â
Mark 3:24-25 (NAS)
Why should individuals join a team that is going in a different direction than they desire? Frequently they do so because the purposes of the team were not clearly defined. They naively or innocently joined a group they thought was going where they were going.
This brings us to one of the major roles of a leader. For it is the leader who must ensure that purpose is defined, clarified, and communicated. If this is done clearly, people of like mind will join the team. Those who are not will not get on this boat. They find one going to their destination.
Note to Facilitator: If time and setting allows, give the team an opportunity to discuss and evaluate their team purpose against our criteria.
If they discover that it is âaverageâ or lower, ask them how it must change to increase its motivational power.
Have each individual take a minute and write on a piece of paper 3 or 4 key teaching points they have learned. Ask them to then take a couple of minutes and share them with the group. After 3 or 4 minutes bring up your list. Read from slide. Do not get bogged down with details; keep a good, healthy pace going.
<number>
Š
Take a few moments and answer these questions in your workbook.
Even though roles are a critical component of team effort, they are often a point of confusion.
I am reminded of the story of the photographer for a national news magazine who was assigned to get photographs of a great forest fire that was raging in the west.
Smoke at the scene hampered him and he asked the home office to hire a plane for him. Arrangements were made, and he was told to go at once to a nearby airport where a plane would be waiting.
When he arrived at the airport, sure enough, there was a plane warming up near the runway. He ran toward the small plane and jumped in with his equipment and yelled, âLetâs go! Letâs go!â The pilot swung the plane into the air.
MORE
âFly over the north side of the fire,â yelled the photographer, âand make three or four low-level passes.â
âWhy?â asked the pilot.
âBecause Iâm going to take pictures,â cried the photographer. âIâm a photographer and photographers take pictures!â
After a long pause the pilot said, âYou mean youâre not the flight instructor!â
Obviously these poor fellas really werenât sure what the role of the other was in an endeavor that was clearly critical to their success!
Common Purpose is our reason. Dividing the task into a series of separate roles is our strategy for cooperating.
This is Godâs strategy for the Church as well.
Paul clarifies roles in his first letter to the Corinthian church.
Isaiah described several roles in Chapter 41.
There are generally several types of roles found on every team...
One role is to provide the functional expertise needed by the team in a certain area. For example: music, CE, or mission.
Secondly, we have formal and informal roles:
- The team leader is a formal roleâformal in that it is assigned.
- There are informal roles as well, often based on the gifts, interests, or temperaments of the individual. Examples would be people who seem gifted at keeping the peace in a stressful situation or individuals who can help the team see the big picture when itâs bogged down.
Finally, there are the general team member roles. These apply to everyone. It might be as simple as:
- Ensuring we hit our dates for commitments
- Meeting attendance
- Taking the initiative to provide input
Role clarity is not an issue when one person does all of the work.
But when you divide the task and spread parts of it among multiple people, knowing who does what part becomes very important . . .
. . . because, in dividing the task, we have introduced the side effect of interdependence.
Interdependence introduces a complexity and risk into our effort because now we must manage the boundaries between roles.
With a divided task new questions become important:
⢠What is my job and where does it stop?
⢠What is your job and where does it start?
I must master my role.
I must understand yours and how our two roles
relate.
I must understand how all of our roles fit into
the overall team process.
We have introduced a new concept critically important to teams: PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY; MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY.
In a context of different roles, there are three possibilities: clear, confused, or chaotic.
Many people believe the natural state of roles to be the latter.
Interdependence is risky because, by definition, we must rely on the character and competency of others.
What happens if #1 doesnât come to work today? (CLICK)
If #4 is incompetent? (CLICK)
Or if #2 and 3 donât get along? (CLICK)
In any investment there must be a balance between risk and returnâinterdependence is the risk; synergistic results are the return. But synergy doesnât just happenâyou must be intentional about pursuing it.
Interdependence is the toll gate to synergy for the team, but to realize that synergy you must excel in managing in three areas: (CLICK)
Boundaries . . . (CLICK)
Attitudes, and ⌠(CLICK)
Differences
Letâs take a few minutes to unpack these three important aspects of interdependence.
First, Boundary Management. It is at this critical interface between roles that the batons are exchanged . . . or not. How many of you have experienced this type of situation?
The importance of boundary management is found in Nehemiah Chapter 3. He divided the task of rebuilding Jerusalemâs walls in a unique way, breaking it down into 41 sections, assigning each section to a different group or family unit.
What a great strategy from a quality perspective! If you were a Philistine and wanted to get through the wall, what part would you go through?âthe weakest. Knowing that, how would you build the wall in front of your house?
Such a strategy required that Nehemiah be very CLEAR about which section was assigned to whom. When you find time, look at the level of detail in Nehemiah 3.
In such a setting, managing the boundaries (i.e., the gap and overlap) between roles is critical. One mis-step and we can quickly move from clarity to chaos. (NEXT SLIDE)
Too many pastors have told me this looked like a poster from their last building project!
Secondly, we must manage attitudes about roles. There are two common problems with role attitudes:
First, the attitude of ownership that says, âThis is MY JOB, stay out!â These people donât want any input or interloping into their role territory. In such a situation, the collective IQ quickly becomes retarded.
A second attitude is âThat is YOUR JOB, see you later.â Joshua addresses this issue in Joshua 1. . .
At last, the people of God are ready to cross the Jordan River and enter the Promised Land. In verses 10-11, Joshua gives instructions to get ready and prepare provisions. And then he turns to three of the tribes, the Reubenites, Gadites, and the half-tribe of Manasseh with a special message (Joshua 1:12-18).
These three tribes had been assigned territory on the east side of the Jordan. They did not, as did the other nine tribes, have to wrestle their land away from its present inhabitants. But Joshua understood the principle that no one was finished until everyone was finished.
â. . . But you shall cross before your brothers in battle array, all your valiant warriors, and shall help them, until the LORD gives your brothers rest, as He gives you, and they also possess the land which the LORD your God is giving them. Then you shall return to your own land.â (Josh. 1:14-15)
When we have a balanced, healthy perspective of roles, we realize that itâs
Not My Job
or
Your Job
But My part of Our job.
<number>
Š
Finally, we must manage differences, and the insight here is that unity comes before division. No passage conveys a healthy concept of division of labor as does I Cor. 12. But many fail to see the architecture Paul builds into the concept. First letâs look at verses 4-6:
âThere are different kinds of gifts but the (CLICK) SAME Spirit. There are different kinds of service but the (CLICK) SAME Lord. There are different kinds of working but the (CLICK) SAME God works in all of them in all men now to each one, the manifestation of the spirit is given for the (CLICK) COMMON GOOD.â
He establishes unity before he explains the division (verses 7-31). âNow the body is not made up of one part but of manyâ (verse 14) â
Foot
Hand
Ear
Eye
Then, he gives us the recipe for the glue that holds everything together in the very next chapter. I Cor. 13:4-8 lists the ingredients of love, called the âperfect bond [glue] of unity.â (Col. 3:14) Look at the pattern: unityâdivisionâunity.
Bill Russell* reflects such intentionality in a quote from the book, Second Wind. (Page 40 in your workbook).
What a powerful statement. When was the last time your team sat down and tried to think of ways to make the combination of your roles more effective?
*Former Boston Celtic star; won 11 championships in 13 years.
Division and diversity are important concepts⌠different gifts, skills and experiences... How can you leverage (i.e., multiply the impact) the different and collective roles on your team?
Thatâs a great list. Ours is very similar:
Look to the edge. By this we mean look to people with different roles, skills, expertise for input and ideas. Sometimes the best Christian Education ideas come from team members who know little about Christian Education. (CLICK)
Read the book on everyone. How many of you have seen the movie âPattonâ? Remember that scene in Northern Africa as Patton lays a trap for Rommel? We find Patton on the top of a high bluff looking down into a valley. Rommelâs tanks are coming in the far end. As they come up the valley, American tanks catch them by surprise, attacking their flanks.
As he sees his success, Patton yells, âRommel, you old fox, I read your book.â What Patton meant was that he studied Rommel. He knew how he thought and how he reacted.
We need to read the book on our teammates. What are their gifts? Strengths? Skills? (CLICK)
Proactively seek input. âProactiveâ because itâs often the quiet team members who are the most analytical and can bring tremendous insight . . . if asked. (CLICK)
Ensure your team has enough difference and the right kind of difference. The more diverse a team is, the smarter it is. A diverse team can surround a decision, problem, or issue with a broader array of experience, perspective, and skill. There is a down sideâdifference needs to be managed or it can often lead to strife rather than synergy. (CLICK)
Ensure ministry roles are gift-based . . . (CLICK)
Spiritual gifts were Godâs idea. He distributed them to His Church because He believed that we would need them to get the job done.
Iâm not sure if anything is more misunderstood in the modern Church than the concept of spiritual gifts. I meet more people in ministry that are given a role (because they wanted it or they were available) and then assumed the gifts that are commensurate with that role than I do people who, because of a specific spiritual gift, were assigned a role.
God wants roles in the Church to be gift-based. We must learn to master the understanding of spiritual gifts and then put that understanding into practice as we staff teams in ministry organizations.
NOTE TO FACILITATOR: If you have not done the Paper Clip exercise in Roles, this may be an appropriate time to conduct the exercise before you introduce this section.
You can locate the paper clip exercise and its instructions in your facilitation book under the Exercises tab.
Interdependence must be managedâwith the labor divided, a high degree of coordination and integration is needed. Cooperation is the prescription for interdependence.
Leaders play that role. They are the ones who coordinate the efforts between the different roles, beat the cadence, and facilitate communication: âPete slow down, Mary speed up, Bob wake up.â
The first thing our sword makers had to do when they divided the task was to select a coordinatorâŚa leader.
Take a moment and jot down your thoughts regarding the three questions on page 45.
Effective teams are not free-form, unstructured, or democratic. On the contrary, when we find a High Performance Team, we invariably find well-defined, clear, formal ACCEPTED LEADERSHIP.
It is leadership that provides the âstructureâ for cooperation.
Research consistently shows the weaker the leadership the weaker the team. (CLICK)
Listen to the word Kanter usesââconstraint.â Thatâs a challenging word for a country of ârugged individualsâ: John Wayne, Patch Adams, Serpico, Sam Spadeâno constraints for those guys.
How does that word sound to you? Is it a positive or negative concept?
For most of us itâs negative. We donât want to be constrained. However, this might be the wrong paradigm.
<number>
Š
Another word for constraint is âstructure.â
The structure a team leader brings into the situation is very much like the riverbanks of a river.
Within the banks the river is powerful and productive; outside the banks, it makes a mess. Effective team leaders provide focus, set direction, and channel the efforts of a team.
Notice what kind of leadership teams demand: âAcceptedâ leadership. But sometimes in the process of providing structure, leaders lose the needed acceptance.
Just because you have the position, that doesnât mean people will follow. When leadership is accepted, people act differently than when itâs not. When people âacceptâ the leader, we can see it reflected in their behavior. What would we look for?
What behaviors on the part of a leader would promote acceptance on the part of team members?
Leadership in its purest form is influence.
Thatâs where acceptance comes in. We choose to allow someone to influence us. Thatâs what we mean by âacceptedâ leadership.
What are some of the reasons leadership might not be accepted?âŚ.That is, we donât allow them to influence us, at least very much
One reason, we might be resistant to leadership is that either we (or the leader) have a different perspective of the role of leadership. (CLICK) What do you think the role of team leaders should be?
Hereâs our list, weâve built it from a lot of input in sessions like this one. Youâll see your thoughts in our listâŚ.
How leaders perform these roles is critically important to the level of acceptance team members will extend.
The reason âacceptanceâ is so important is that teams are volunteer organizations.
Remember our model, âTeams are Volunteer Organizations.â Acceptable performance is what we are paid forâthe organization demands acceptable performance. What is needed is compliance, and thatâs what management ensures.
However, exceptional performance is over and aboveâitâs volunteered. You canât command it. Itâs not about compliance, but rather commitment. You cannot command commitment. It must be volunteered. It must be called out of people and thatâs what leadership is all about.
The bottom line is that you canât manage volunteers, they must be led. And they must âacceptâ the leader before they allow themselves to be led to exceptional levels of performance.
âHOWâ a leader performs his or her role determines acceptance. âHOWâ a leader performs his/her role is strongly influenced by their value systemâwhat they believe about people.
On page 50, we introduce the issue of convictionsâ our convictions (philosophy/mindset) determine what we believe about people and our beliefs drive our behavior. Take a moment and identify the convictions an accepted leader must have.
This last point is important because . . . [next slide]
On high performance teams leadership is task-driven. Another way of saying this is that teams . . . [next slide]
. . . have two types of leaders.
They will always have a single TEAM leader, but frequently moment-by-moment leadership is delegated to a âTASKâ leader.
An effective team is a band of individual specialists, each bringing a unique bundle of skills and experiences that can be mobilized against a given problem or project. Moment-by-moment leadership is task-driven, as the individual with the appropriate skill or knowledge facilitates a team effort against a given task for which he or she is best suited to provide leadership.
A key role for the team leader is to facilitate the constant change of task leadership.
Remember our geese? Watch a flock for a few minutes and you will see a constant rotation around leadership.
When that functional expert is leading, itâs important that the team also accept his or her influence (leadership). What is one of the most important factors in motivating that acceptance?
We find that all of these are important, but a vital one is the acceptance of the task by the task leader. On a team, everyone is either leading or supporting, even the team leader.
We can summarize our thoughts using the graphic on page 51. It clearly shows the relationship âthe connection between the leader and the team. And thatâs what leadership isâŚA RELATIONSHIP.
We often hear about how important it is for leaders to âempowerâ those they lead. But in a volunteer or team environment it is the other way around. It is the team that empowers (accepts) the leader. Why would they do that? So he/she will have the needed power to âserveâ them as they serve the task.
People are willing to give power to leaders when they feel safe and served. Servedâthatâs the big idea here. The more power they give to a serving leader, the better he or she can serve them. The key question for the team is: âWhat do we need from our team leader to get this job done?â
If the team doesnât feel served, what will they do? (Stop empowering). If a leader doesnât feel empowered, what will he/she do? (Stop serving)
Autocratic leaders are often insecure people who are taking what they were not given. Jesus sums up the essence of leadership in Matt. 20:26. âBe a servant.â
Servant leaders . . . Notice the order of the words:
Servanthood must be assumed
Leadership is bestowed
Servant leaders see leadership as a role from which to serve, not a position to be served.
While we are on the topic of convictions, letâs identify those of effective team members.
Itâs unlikely that one could be a good leader unless they were first a good follower.
Teams are just as much about effective team members and followers as they are about effective leadershipâthe two go hand in hand.
A great biblical illustration is found in I Samuel 14. Saulâs son, Jonathan, collected his armor bearer and decided (without his fatherâs knowledge) to see what damage he could do to the Philistine garrison on the other side of the pass. Just down from the Philistine camp, Jonathan said to his companion (verse 6), âCome and let us pass over to the garrison of these uncircumcised; perhaps the Lord will work for us, for the Lord is not restrained to save by many or by few.â This passage is often used to demonstrate Jonathanâs faith, but look at the next verse and you will see a profound example of a loyal followerâŚ
The armor bearer responded: âDo all that is in your heart; turn yourself, and here I am with you according to your desire.â (verse 7)
There are many challenges to leadership. We have highlighted three for review at your convenience.
This slide is provided as a placeholder for you to insert the eight Challenges to Leadership slides in the back of this PowerPoint presentation if you choose to use them.
Rather than challenge, letâs encourage them. Itâs hard being up frontâthereâs a lot of wind resistance and thatâs the goose that everyone shoots at.
Effective processes provide a teamâs âmethodâ of cooperation.
Most teams have two types of processes:
1. Implementation processes (or work processes)
2. Thinking processes
They represent the . . . [next slide]
. . . two dimensions of teamwork.
Most teams focus on the work processes but seldom address the thinking processes, and thatâs where a lot of the synergy is.
We can picture the thinking part of teamwork with this diagram:
Teams generally come together to set a goal, develop a plan, make a decision, resolve a conflict, etc. The team enters the room with a broad âgeneralâ direction but little alignment.
The first thing that happens is divergence (to go in different directions) as the team explores the issue and discovers different opinions and points of view. At this point, we are in the thick of it.
If a team is conflict-avoidant and doesnât know how to handle conflict constructively, they often shut down this dimension of team thinking, either avoiding the discussion or choosing it prematurely. Either way, the collective IQ isnât engaged, synergy is not discovered.
After sharing, LISTENING and UNDERSTANDING the points of view generally begin to converge (come together)âoften not to one personâs position but rather to a new insight discerned collectively. The team leaves aligned, with a âsharedâ direction.
In some respects, we can describe team thinking processes over time with this slide: a series of meetings in which the team comes together to think through different types of issues.
Weâre going to do a short exercise to show the power of process. Keep your sheets face down until I tell you to start the exercise. Your paper has a group of numbers like this. [next slide]
When I say âgo,â turn your sheets over and circle the numbers as fast as possible in sequence. #1, then #2, then #3, and so on in sequence.
How many of you got 13?
How many got 12? 11? 10? 9? 8?
7? 6? 5? 4? 3? 2? 1? . . .
Well, itâs clear to me, as team leader, that we need an agreed-upon process. Let me outline what that process should be.
[CLICK] First, divide your paper into quadrants as I have. Done
[CLICK] Next, observe the pattern
[CLICK] One more time. Letâs try it one more time using our process.
<number>
Š
Put your pencil on the last number you circled. When I say âgoâ circle as many numbers as you can using our new process.
âHow many of you tripled production?â
To most people many processes (meetings, planning, decision-making) looks like a set of random activities just like this set of numbers. With any process itâs important to discover the pattern. Only then can you map and improve it.
High performance teams are âprocess pathfinders.â They are constantly tinkering with the process, firmly believing that everything can always be done better.
(CLICK) With this type of commitment their processes bring tremendous added value to their efforts.
Un-designed or neglected over time processes (CLICK) encumber or tax our efforts. The currency of these âtaxingâ processes will be in time, cost, emotions, or all of the above.
There are four key steps to mastering team processes:
1. Identify them. What are our key ministry processes (e.g., worship service)? What are our key thinking processes (e.g., meeting management)?
2. Design and map the process. Describe it. What are the steps, activities, or ground rules? Start with what the ideal outcome of the process will look like.
3. Implement the process and then, afterwards, take a few minutes to watch the game films. Identify the learning insights. What went well? What didnât go so well? How could this be done better?
4. Implement the needed changes. Watch the game films and do it all over again.
Agreement about our processes is critical. If we have plans as a ministry teamâbig plans, based on faithâthen we had better have our act together and be able to execute our part of the plan with precision.
If we donât have agreement in such a plan, the results can be disastrous. In Judges chapter 7 we find the story of Gideon. Itâs familiar to most of you.
Gideon was charged by God to lead the Israelites in battle against the Midianites who had been harassing the Israelites for years. Anyone remember how many Midianites he had to attack?
Well, there were a lot of them. Judges 7:12 explains that âthey were as thick as locusts and their camels could no more be counted than the sand on the seashore.â The final body count is found in Judges 8:10â135,000!
Now think with me for a second. What if some were not in agreement with the plan? Pretend with me and assume that on the far side of the Midianite camp two Israelite soldiers (letâs call them Joe and Ed) begin the following conversation:
âYou know, Ed,â observes Joe, âI donât think Gideon has this thing quite right. I think we should break our jugs now.â
If Ed concurs and they follow through, what do you think would happen?
Agreement is critical in Godâs plans. Weâre always up against big issues with smaller resources from a human perspective.
Have each individual take a minute and write on a piece of paper 3 or 4 key teaching points they have learned. Ask them to then take a couple of minutes and share them with the group. After 3 or 4 minutes bring up your list. Read from the slide. Do not get bogged down with details; keep a good, healthy pace going.
Iâm not sure we donât get more confused about this element of teamwork than any other. We have a pre-conception of what a working relationship looks like. Many of us sense that we need to be âbest friendsâ with everyone on the team. Nothing can be further from the truth.
Synergism is born out of our ability to divide the tasks. That, in turn, is a product of different gifts, experiences, skills, interests, personalities, etc. Those differences can create either synergy or strife. These differences will make it very unlikely that all of us will be âbest friendsâ with every single team member.
However, the relationship is solid. By solid I mean the relationship can withstand the jolts and turbulence of day-to-day interactionâmisunderstandings, bad hair days, and disagreements.
An athletic team doesnât win because they like to be together. They win because they know how to work together. The relationship is characterized by a knowledge of each otherâs strengths and weaknesses, and the unique contributions each member brings to that team. The relationship is relaxed, but not always warm.
Solid relationships provide the âclimateâ for cooperation, and we believe such relationships have seven important qualities.
The first quality is trustâitâs critical because I will not be interdependent with those I do not trust.
There are only two areas in which we can build or break trust:
Character
Competence
Stephen Covey in The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People explains that trust has to be earned (in reality, people only âlendâ us their trust). âImagine,â suggests Covey, âthat you have to establish a âtrust accountâ with another person and then begin making deposits (and withdrawals).â
What would it take to make a character deposit (CLICK) (do what you say you will do)? What about a competence deposit (CLICK) (do it well)?
Can you overdraw an account? (CLICK) What are the implications for that in a team setting? Can an account ever be closed? (CLICK) Again, what are the implications for the team?
NOTE: You canât invest trust in a team but only team members. You have to open accounts with every individual team member.
Next:
Respect for your unique contribution
Acceptance of your differences (âsome Greek, some Jewish, some Scythian, some slaves, some free, some with the gift of teaching, others evangelism, others prophesyâ)
Understanding of your goals and aspirations, personality, gifts, strengths, weaknesses
Courtesy/Sincerity â civility
Mutual accountability
Love â According to Godâs Word, a non-negotiable
<number>
Š
We find the principle in John 13:34 (CLICK) and an illustration of practice in Philippians 2:1-4 (CLICK):
God organized the work of ministry in such a way that it must be a collaborative effort. It makes perfect sense that He would be concerned about interpersonal relationships that would make such collaboration possible. In Matthew 5 we see that relationship comes before worship. âIf therefore you are presenting your offering at the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your offering there before the altar, and go your way; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and present your offering.â (Matt. 5:23-24). It would seem that if we canât have fellowship with each other, it is unlikely we can have fellowship with God.
High performance teams often establish operating principles that govern how members are to behave when interacting with each other.
Frequently these principles are stated as expectationsâ expectations of how we will relate to one another. For example:
âWe treat each other with dignity and respect.â
âWe meet our commitments to one another.â
Notice these statements are stated in present tense. They represent current commitments, not future intentions.
Periodically, teams take time to assess how well their âwalkâ matches their âtalkâ and revitalize their commitment.
God provides a number of key operating principles that He believes need to govern the relationships between Christians. Weâve listed a few of these references on the facing page.
After they have had time to look up the verses . . . if time, give the team a few minutes to draft their own operating principles on page 71 of their workbooks. They may only want to commit to those above (thatâs okay).
When working with intact teams, we highly suggest you park here for 15 minutes and have the team leaders facilitate the development of team operating principles. The principles they develop as a team will help to address the concept of mutual accountability.
The power of team operating principles is that they give the team an agreed-upon set of ground rules by which to hold each other accountable. Nehemiah used such an approach with the Israelite nobles in Nehemiah 5. These were tough times in Israel, particularly for the poor. They were forced to borrow money from the nobles who were charging them 12% (1/100 part every month), verse 11. When they couldnât pay, the nobles took their lands, houses, even their children (verse 5).
Nehemiah rebuked them (verse 9), âThe thing which you are doing is not good; should you not walk in the fear of our God . . .?â
His team operating principle came from was Godâs word, something that had been lost to the people. The book of Nehemiah is about repairing the walls and restoring the people and the need to do so is seen in this event.
Have each individual take a minute and write on a piece of paper 3 or 4 key teaching points they have learned. Ask them to then take a couple of minutes and share them with the group. After 3 or 4 minutes bring up your list. Read from the slide. Do not get bogged down with details; keep a good, healthy pace going.
Leadership provides the âstructureâ for cooperation.
Plans and methods provide the âprocessâ for cooperation.
Solid relationships provide the âclimateâ for cooperation.
COMMUNICATION provides the âmeansâ for cooperation.
For something so critical, we have a tremendously difficult time with it.
Poor communication can and does have disastrous consequences (Ark/Park).
For something that appears to be so simple and straightforward, it is very difficult. George Bernard Shaw observed that the most challenging problem with communication is the assumption it has taken place.
There are a lot of filters/barriers to clear communication.
To complicate the matter, only 10% of any communication is found in the words themselves. 90% is contained in the non-verbal portion.
This is a challenging insight in a world of e-mail, voice mail, and fax!
When teams are spread out, communication is particularly difficult.
To sustain effective and high levels of cooperation our communication must have four qualities:
1. Clear
2. Open and Honest
3. Timely
Bob Waterman, co-author of In Search of Excellence, observes (page 75 in your workbook), â[The companies that engender effective teamwork] enjoy a communication level that seems uncanny to outsiders; important ideas move like quicksilver. Decisions are made in the hallways and on telephones. Formal meetings are less frequent and not all that formal.â
4. Accurate
Take a few moments individually to answer the 20 questions on the Communication Inventory on pages 76 and 77.
The following story will make my point.
Communication or Confusion
Do you ever tell somebody something in the work setting and by the time it gets back to you the story is completely changed? Listen to this school superintendent telling the assistant superintendent the following:
Next Thursday at 10:30 a.m., Haleyâs Comet will appear over this area. This is an event which occurs only once every 75 years. Call the school principals and have them assemble the teachers and classes on their athletic fields and explain this phenomenon to them. If it rains, cancel the dayâs activities and have the classes meet in the auditoriums to see a film about the Comet.
The assistant superintendent naturally said yes. She has to pass the exact same message, word for word, on to the school principals, but this is what the school principals heard:
By order of the Superintendent of Schools, next Thursday at 10:30 a.m., Haleyâs Comet will appear on your athletic field. If it rains, cancel the dayâs classes and report to the auditorium with your teachers and students where you will be shown films, a phenomenal event which occurs only once every 75 years.
The principals were asked to pass this on to the teachers. This is what the teachers heard:
By order of the phenomenal Superintendent of Schools, at 10:30 next Thursday, Haleyâs Comet will appear in the auditorium. In case of rain on the athletic field, the Superintendent will give another order, something which occurs only once every 75 years.
The teachers were asked to pass this message on to the students. This is what the students heard:
Next Thursday at 10:30 the Superintendent of Schools will appear in our school auditorium with Haleyâs Comet, something which occurs every 75 years. If it rains, the Superintendent of Schools will cancel the Comet and have us all meet on your phenomenal athletic field.
Then the students were asked to take this home to their parents. Many of us have been on the receiving end of a message like this. (What we usually get is nothing, but if we do get something this is the way it comes out.)
When it rains next Thursday at 10:30 over the school athletic field, the phenomenal 75 year old Superintendent of Schools will cancel all classes and will appear before the whole school in the auditorium accompanied by Bill Hailey and the Comets.
God is all about communication. In some respects this is what this whole exercise is aboutâGod communicating with His creation.
He âspokeâ the world into being. Ten times in the first chapter of Genesis we find âGod said.â
The whole Bible is about God speaking/communicating with his people through His prophets, His Spirit, His Son, and His Word. He says some profound things about the nature of His Word:
âFor grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands forever.â Isaiah 40:8
âFor My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways,â declares the Lord. âFor as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts. For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven, and do not return there without watering the earth, and making it bear and sprout, and furnishing seed to the sower and bread to the eater; so shall My word be which goes forth from My mouth; it shall not return to me empty, without accomplishing what I desire, and without succeeding in the matter for which I sent it.â Isaiah 55:8-11)
His Word is woven into the fabric of His nature. âIn the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.â (John 1:1). â. . . and the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.â (John 1:14)
Paul was a master at team communication, accounting for 13 of the New Testament letters. His messengers crisscrossed the Roman Empire carrying these messages and others to the Church.
Following for reference only:
âAnd when I arrive, whomever you may approve, I shall send them with letters to carry your gift to Jerusalem.â (I Cor. 16:3)
âBut I hope in the Lord Jesus to send Timothy to you shortly, so that I also may be encouraged when I learn of your condition.â (Phil. 2:19)
But I thought it necessary to send to you Epaphroditus, my brother and fellow worker and fellow soldier, who is also your messenger and minister to my need.â (Phil 2:25)
âWhen I send Artemas or Tychicus to you, make every effort to come to me at Nicopolis, for I have decided to spend the winter there.â (Titus 3:12)
âOnly Luke is with me. Pick up Mark and bring him with you, for he is useful to me for service. But Tychicus I have sent to Ephesus. When you come bring the cloak which I left at Troas with Carpus, and the books, especially the parchments.â (II Tim. 4:11-13)
In Paulâs time this was called âE-Jail.â
And now we are back to Common Purpose. Communication flows into Purpose, completing the Team Wheel . . .
. . . for without excellent communication a team cannot maintain unity or purpose.
We find this principle clearly expressed in Genesis 11. With corporate clients we tell the story as follows:
Babel Engineering was building a high-rise and ran into zoning infractions. God had told the people to scatter and, instead, they decided to gather and use this high-rising tower as their gathering point. As God watched events unfold from heaven He made the following observation: âBehold, they are one people, and they all have the same language. And this is what they began to do, and now nothing which they purpose to do will be impossible for them.â (Gen. 11:6).
They have the same language, nothing they purpose to do will be impossible for them. If that could only be said about the average ministry team. It doesnât take the typical team long to come up with their own dialect of âBabel.â
Godâs concern was not that they spoke with one language but that they were not aligned with Him in their purpose. They had unity of purpose but it was the wrong purpose!
It was their purpose that He wanted to thwart and how did He do it?
He took away their language, âCome let Us go down and confuse their language . . .â Without excellent communication they were unable to sustain unity of purpose. Neither can we!
Have each individual take a minute and write on a piece of paper 3 or 4 key teaching points they have learned. Ask them to then take a couple of minutes and share them with the group. After 3 or 4 minutes bring up your list. Read from the slide. Do not get bogged down with details; keep a good, healthy pace going.
Progress in team development comes not in one giant step but rather a series of âmini-stepsâ in which the team gets a little bit better in some aspect of teamwork every day.
Thatâs itâsix characteristics of a Powerful Ministry Team.
Common Purpose - our reason for cooperation
Clear Roles - our strategy for cooperation
Accepted Leadership - our structure for cooperation
Effective Processes - our method for cooperation
Solid Relationships - our climate for cooperation
Excellent Communication - our means of cooperation
Do these things!
There are two dimensions of alignment:
Purpose
People
Understanding the distinctives is important.
Philippians gives us a great illustration of purpose or task alignment.
<number>
Š
Unity of Spirit and Purpose
âWhatever happens, conduct yourselves in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ. Then, whether I come and see you or only hear about you in my absence, I will know that you stand firm in one spirit, contending as one man for the faith of the gospel.â
Philippians 1:27
<number>
Š
âIf you have any encouragement from being united in Christ, if any comfort from His love, if any fellowship with the Spirit, if any tenderness and compassion, then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and purpose.â
Philippians 2:1-2
Remember S. D. Gordonâs admonition, âThe united church would be an unconquerable church. But the moment cooperation (i.e., unity) is sacrificed as an essential, real power is at the disappearing point.â
âStriving togetherâ (Phil. 1:27), âIntent on one purposeâ (Phil. 2:2)
The focus in these two passages is on purpose . . . âthe faith of the gospel.â
<number>
Š
Then there is unity between believers, a consistent theme in the the New Testament.
We see this priority reflected in the Lordâs prayer in John 17.
<number>
Š
In Ephesians 4, Paul reminds us that we must . . .
âMake every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spiritâjust as you were called to one hope when you were calledâone Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all.â
We can see this in practice in Acts 15:36-40. Paul and Barnabas were preparing to leave on their second missionary journey.
Alignment and Unity are first cousins definitionally, but are subtly different.
There are numerous areas in which we can have or not have unity or be in or out of alignmentâpurpose, doctrine, philosophy of ministry, strategy, etc. I sometimes see people in ministry forcing unnecessary breaks in Christian fellowship because they link people and purpose issues too tightly.
There will be times that individuals or groups will be called to different purposes (e.g., evangelism versus relief and development, church planting versus Christian education, youth ministry versus medical missions). We can be mis-aligned about purpose (direction) but are never to lose our unity in relationship. Where lack of alignment regarding purpose can hurt is when different people in the same organizational boat want to go in different directions and expend their energy attempting to thwart the purpose of the others in order to serve their own intentions or calling.
Barnabas wanted to take John Mark (his cousin) with them; Paul insisted they should not take him because he had deserted them in Pamphylia (Acts 13:13) when he had accompanied them on part of their first journey. Scripture says there arose such a âsharp disagreementâ over the issue that Paul and Barnabas separated from one another, Barnabas taking Mark to Cypress and Paul departing for Syria with Silas. Paulâs decision was motivated by his sense of priority of the journey and the need for commitment, steadfastness, and self-sacrifice Mark had not demonstrated on the earlier journey. He was operating on the principle that the best indicator of what a person will do is what he has done. Barnabas, more relationally oriented in his nature, saw some undeveloped potential in Mark.
We donât know who was right but they were not aligned in their strategy and therefore parted company in two different directions. Note, however, the relationship was not broken. Although Barnabas disappears from the Book of Acts at this point, it is implied that his connection with Paul was not broken (I Cor. 9:6). In II Timothy 4:11 Paul tells Timothy to âpick up Mark and bring him with you, for he is useful to me for service.â
<number>
Š
Sometimes the lack of acceptance is not the fault of the leader but rather the motives of those being led. Leaders are all about change. They challenge people to leave their comfort zones and enter the wildernessâthe white area on the map. To accomplish such a task they must successfully convey two messages: First, the Egyptian army is behind us and, secondly, the Promised Land is in front of us. In spite of those two compelling reasons, people donât like the wilderness and they soon begin to rethink their acceptance of leadership. When leadership is not accepted, there are challenges from those being led and these challenges tend to be of a consistent nature. We find the three most common challenges in the book of Numbers.
The challenge FOR leadership
The challenge TO leadership
The challenge OF leadership
We find the first in Numbers 12:1-8.
Challenge for POSITION (Numbers 12:1-2): âThen Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Cushite woman whom he had married (for he had married a Cushite woman); and they said, âHas the Lord indeed spoken only through Moses? Has He not spoken through us as well?â And the Lord heard it.â
Miriam and Aaron confront Moses with two challenges: first, his wife, because she was a Cushite or Arabian for reasons unknownâpossibly she had had a falling out with Miriam or had unduly influenced Moses in the choice of the 70 elders (Matthew Henry). In some respects this wasnât the core issue but merely a means of putting Moses on the defensive.
The foundation of their challenge is one of leadership. They believed that Moses had too much powerâGod had spoken to them as well (Exodus 4:15; Exodus 15:20), and they wanted equality even with those God had clearly given preference. They were challenging for leadership. They wanted to be the leaders.
Have you experienced such challenges?
â How did you feel?
â How did you react?
â How was the challenge resolved?
â How would you advise a young leader to respond in the face of such a challenge?
Challenge to DIRECTION (Numbers 14:1-4): âThen all the congregation lifted up their voices and cried, and the people wept that night. And all the sons of Israel grumbled against Moses and Aaron; and the whole congregation said to them, âWould that we had died in the land of Egypt! Or would that we had died in this wilderness! And why is the Lord bringing us into this land, to fall by the sword? Our wives and our little ones will become plunder; would it not be better for us to return to Egypt?â So they said to one another, âLet us appoint a leader and return to Egypt.ââ
The Israelites have just received the report from the spies Moses sent to gather intelligence about Canaan, the Promised Land. They reported that although it certainly flowed with milk and honey as the Lord had promised, it also had giantsâbig ones!
Somehow the milk and honey got lost in the translation and the people focused on the giants. Moses was saying, âOur direction is toward the Promised Land.â The people were challenging that direction. They wanted to turn around and return to Egypt.
What was the motivation of the Israelites to return to Egypt? Their life there had been miserable, the life they had led with Godâs provision during their trek through the wilderness had been profound. Every desire was filled. What would make them want to throw away the promise of this new land, one flowing with milk and honey?
How should a leader respond to a challenge to direction?
The challenge of the CONCEPT of Leadership itself (Numbers 16:1-3): âNow Korah the son of Izhar, the son of Kohath, the son of Levi, with Dathan and Abiram, the sons of Eliab, and On the son of Peleth, sons of Reuben, took action, and they rose up before Moses, together with some of the sons of Israel, two hundred and fifty leaders of the congregation, chosen in the assembly, men of renown. And they assembled together against Moses and Aaron, and said to them, âYou have gone far enough, for all the congregation are holy, every one of them, and the Lord is in their midst; so why do you exalt yourselves above the assembly of the Lord?ââ
Here Moses is confronted with a full blown rebellion (called in Jude 11, The Rebellion of Korah). With Korah as the ringleader, the group (mob) of Israelite leaders challenge Moses and Aaron.
The concern of the challengers is one of powerâthey think too much honor and power is ascribed to Moses and Aaron, especially Aaron in his role as priest (verses 8-10).
Adam Clarkâs commentary provides an amplified translation: âHoly offices are not equally distributed: you arrogate (To claim or seize without right⌠to arrogantly appropriate) to yourselves the most important ones, as if your superior holiness entitled you alone to them; whereas all the congregation are holy, and have an equal right with you to be employed in the most holy services.â
This is a challenge of leadership, of the very concept itselfââWe donât need a leader.â