edu 645 week 4 assignment analyzing and improving a test using statistics,edu 645 week 4 dq 1 item analysis,edu 645 week 4 dq 2 marking,ash edu 645 week 4,ash edu 645 week 4,ash edu 645,ash edu 645 week 4 tutorial,ash edu 645 week 4 assignment,ash edu 645 week 4 help

1. ASH EDU 645 Week 4 Journal Rubric Analysis (2
Papers) NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/edu-645-
ash/edu-645-week-4-journal-rubric-analysis-
2-papers-new
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers
EDU 645 Week 4 Journal
Rubric Analysis
Using two different sources, respond in writing
(APA format) using the prompts below to guide
your written analysis.
Part 1:
Explore the Exemplars website, specifically the
Resources tab for Rubrics. Review the Exemplars
Math Rubric and Exemplars Reading Rubric.
Questions to discuss:
o How does the Exemplars criteria for both math
and reading rubrics follow a top-down or bottom-
up approach? How do you know?
o To what degree are performance level

2. descriptions addressed?
o Do these live up to what Brookhart proposes,
that “. . .the most important aspect of the levels is
that performance be described, with language that
depicts what one would observe in the work
rather than the quality conclusions one would
draw” (p.26)?
o In your opinion, what are the values placed on
using the terminology for mastery (Novice,
Apprentice, Practitioner, and Expert)? In other
words, how effective do you believe this
terminology is and why?
Part 2:
Explain the position Brookhart argues in Chapter
2 against rubrics that merely summarize the
requirements of the task, as opposed to rubrics
that describe evidence of learning.
Explain what Brookhart means when saying;
“Rubrics should not confuse the learning outcome
to be assessed with the task used to asses it”
(p.15).
What is the relationship between this and what
you learned about aligning formative assessments
with the learning standards and objectives?