Effect Of The Environment On Western Settlers Essay

Effect Of The Environment On Western Settlers Essay
Effect of the Environment on Western Settlers
As the country grew and expanded, the American people where always one to push their bounds. In
1763, we proudly, defied England's proclamation of the year, and settled west of the Appalachian
mountains. A little later, the westward people pushed Indians, animals, and society to a place where
no
American person had gone before. But all the while, one important factor determined where they
transported themselves, where they settled, and what they did when they got there. This factor, the
environment, profoundly affected the settlers way of life, and other factors, such as the Indians and
the railroad, only aggravated a pre–existing condition. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With an increased sense of independence, women had gained rights to vote and proprietorship. But
with this increased sense of independence came the added responsibility of being the family doctor,
chef, and provider of family comfort and support. Women even faced the grim possibility of giving
birth on the trail.
The environment also affected the health of the people who lived in the west. In the middle of the
desert, with scarce sources of food and water, the people and environment became one. With the
water remote and out of hand, the emigrants faced higher incidents of dysentery and diarrhea, which
stemmed from their inappropriate water supplies.
The environment also molded another aspect of our westward ancestors– their style of architecture
and development. In the east, where the land was expensive and hard to find, people generally built
towards the heavens. But in the lands west of the Mississippi, where the land was found easily and
very cheaply, the people generally built outward with buildings no taller than two stories. Perhaps
we should of learned from the Indians of the past, who built in natural recesses in the mountains to
provide natural protection and shade.
But other factors also played a role in westward movement, although it's
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

English Settlers Of 1607 Research Paper
Do you know the the English settlers of 1607 were the first successful permanent English settlement
that would be part of the U.S.? The English settlers established Jamestown in 1607. They built a
large and met with the Native Americans. The site was a malaria swamp, so many of the men got
sick and died. No women were brought along. They had arrived in May. During the first Winter the
settlers were unprepared. When they arrived it was too late to plant crops, so they had none stored
for the winter, when you can't grow crops. Some of the remaining men died too. Some of the men
seeked help from the Native Americans. The Native Americans were more capable of surviving
harsh winter. In 1609 reinforcements were made.

Germanic Peoples and English Settlers Essay
Ashley Professor Martin HIS 101 10 April 2010 Essay #1 What aspects of the non–English styles
(Spanish, Dutch, French) show a different mindset from that of the English settlers? (That is, what
values or priorities are different?) As we have read in the book, Agriculture has become very big in
our society today. The way a house is built gives a home its beauty, and it's feeling. The non–English
style houses (Spanish, Dutch and French) show a different mindset and have different features
compared to the English settlers. The English were part of what we now call the "eastern Woodland"
culture. They were semi–nomadic, and built simple, temporary houses built from products of the
forest, know as "wigwam," from an ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Dutch colonial manor house is large with a gambrel roof, two chimneys on both ends of the
roof, is all stone, and has three big windows of the front of the house. Dutch style houses are very
pretty and are easily spotted because of their gambrel roofs. The French style houses are pretty but
there are not many around here anymore, the only genuine French buildings left are in New Orleans.
These houses are distinct because they are farm cottages with no yard or porch and are usually built
by the street. I like the French houses. I think they are cute and would be nice to live in. Now days
you do not see houses without a yard or porch but the French did not think it was always necessary
to have these things. The non English Styles all have a distinct aspect that makes them unique. They
are all neat in their own way. Even though every style is different from one another they all are
beautiful and have a distinct feature about them. Although the non–English styles are different from
the English settler styles the English settlers style is still distinct in its own way. Unlike the non–
English styles, the English styles of agriculture were alike and had a lot of the same features. In the
Southwest, the Anasazi and their descendants (Pueblos, Zunis, and Hopis) constructed towns in
desert conditions, usually in narrow canyons. These adobe buildings are often

Hugh Jacob Llwyd Research Paper
Welsh from Wales in the united kingdom Llwyds moved to Canada before moving to the US. Hugh
Jacob Llwyd was the first minister of Grace Episcopal Church in Muskogee, Ok, and has two alter
windows more than 10 feet tall dedicated to him. He was born in Canada. Edwin and his brother
were born in the US, the first US born generation in their family. He was drafted into World War II
during law school where his job involved diplomatic relations overseas. He went on to serve as an
attorney in the military, retiring after more than 20 years and was an attorney for Muskogee County
for over 50 years. He died in 2003.
Touchette–
Originally from France, now called "Cajun", in Louisiana. Some branches of this line can be traced
into the 1700's. In the 1800's, some family came to the territory that would be later called the
Louisiana Purchase. They were fur trappers, killing and skinning the animals to be sent home to sell.
The French Government saw the many single men over here as a problem because they weren't
getting married and having children;the government collected tax for each citizen, so less citizens
mean less taxes. The government began a program known as the "Casket Girls". Usually, it involved
poor girls. The Government sent each girl to marry a fur trapper. Each girl had a box, or "casket", of
new clothes, a fancy brush, and even work animals like a horse or goats. We are ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some members owned vineyards in france near the German Bakers. In the last 150 years, they were
schoolteachers and Baptist ministers. Grace's dad was a circuit preacher. Grace's nephew John
Whisenaunt is a popular basketball coach with wikipedia page about his career. Charles's sister
Mary Alice Ferguson is a semi–retired school teacher In the early 1990's, at a family reunion,
Whisenaunt cousins talked about learning french to visit distant family, but when they arrived, the
family all spoke

What Is Christopher Columbus's Accidental Discovery Of The...
Christopher Columbus' accidental discovery of the americas in 1492 exposed the "New World" to
the domination of European powers.Two of the greatest powers were Great Britain and Spain. Both
nations saw huge economical and political potential in the americas, however the two countries went
about accessing that potential very differently.
At first, Great Britain sent religious groups that it did not particularly agree with and convicted
criminals whom Britain had run out of room for to the New World to move them out of their way
and generate some revenue from lumber and crops in the process. Most of the labor force was
comprised of indentured servants and criminals. There were slaves in the British colonies, but their
popularity had not quite ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In search of Glory, Gold, and God, Spanish explorers such as Hernando Cortes saw vast empires
such as the Inca and Aztec and began devising ways of tearing them to the ground. Not only were
the Spaniards vastly more technologically advanced than the Natives, but the Europeans brought a
secret weapon, more powerful than any sword, with them: smallpox. The disease spread like
wildfire in the unprotected Native populations, severely reducing their numbers before the Spanish
even reached them. Once the spaniards did reach the Empires of the Inca and Aztec, their horses,
armor, and weaponry was centuries ahead of the Natives' arsenal. These advantages, coupled with
the tactical minds of the conquistadors, spelled disaster for the Natives, despite vastly outnumbering
the conquistadors. The conquistadors would kidnap the ruler of the tribe or empire and hold them for
ransom before killing them, effectively dismantling the once powerful civilizations from the inside
out. Now all that is left of the ancient powerhouses of Central America are the ruins of their once
great

Relationship Between The English And The Native Americans
Shayne Chen Mrs. Allen OCO AP US History 27 August 2015 The War of the Change The
relationship between the English and the Native Americans in 1600 to 1700 is one of the most
fluctuating and the most profound relationships in American history. On the one side of the picture,
the harmony between Wampanoag and Puritans even inspires them to celebrate "first
Thanksgiving"; while, by contrast, the conflicts between the Pequots and the English urge them to
antagonize each other, and even wage a war. In addition, the mystery of why the European settlers,
including English, become the dominant power in American world, instead of the indigenous
people, or Indians, can be solved from the examination of the relationship. In a variety of ways, the
relationship drastically alters how people think about and relate to the aborigines. Politically, the
relationship changes to establish the supremacy of the English; the English intends to obtain the land
and rules over it. Socially, the relationship changes to present the majority of the English settlers; the
dominating population is mostly the English settlers. Economically, the relationship changes to
obtain the benefit of the English settlers; they gain profit from the massive resource in America.
Therefore, the relationship does, in fact, change to foreshadow the discordance of the two groups of
people. Firstly, the relationship changes in the politics in many ways. To begin with, the European
settlers, the English, crave so much land

Conflict Between Native Americans And British Settlers
In the seventeenth century, there were many clashes between British settlers and Native Americans
in New England. The British landed in what they believed to be a desolate wilderness which they
would tame and civilize in the name of the Christian God. They viewed the people they encountered
there as savage, primitive, and uncivilized–– almost less than human. The settlers regarded this new
land as unowned–– theirs for the taking. The Natives, on the other hand, saw the British as greedy,
entitled invaders who threatened their way of life, and their existence altogether. As a result, these
two groups often clashed, and struggled to peacefully coexist. This can be seen in, A Relation of the
First Troubles in New England By reason of the Indians there, which recounts, in detail, the various
quarrels between Natives Americans and British settlers in New England. In this essay, I will argue
that the document shows that conflict between the Native Americans and the British settlers–– war,
violence, threats and intimidation–– was completely inevitable due to a lack of communication, a
lack of understanding between the two groups, and the desire by the British settlers to conquer the
untamed, uncivilized New World and the natives inhabiting it. My first point is that conflict between
the British settlers and the Native Americans in New England was inevitable due to a lack of
communication between the two groups. Though it goes without saying, when the English arrived in
the New

Compare And Contrast Jamestown And Plymouth Colonies
Another component comparing Jamestown and Plymouth colonies would be their aspects on Indian
relations. The English colonists arrived in Chesapeake Bay where the Powhatan Indians had been
calling home for quite some time. There were over thirty Indian tribes totaling 14,000 Indians. This
is where the first colony, Jamestown, was settled in 1607. I believe this created a lot of tension
between the Indians and the new settlers considering the previous settling and attacks of the Spanish
on the Indians. The Indians lived such a generous way of life welcoming the new English settlers by
offering them food. However, the good intentions faded quickly after. The leader of the Powhatan
Indians, Powhatan, was intending to entice the English through generosity and their selfless
attitudes. Sure enough, this act of kindness was overlooked by the English colonists, and they
immediately began searching for wealth such as tobacco. As we have spoken about in class,
Jamestown was a colony that significantly valued material objects and wealth; whereas Plymouth
colony did not focus their rule around that idea. The new colonists were so set on acquiring wealth
that they failed to grow crops such as corn and beans. This led the English to depend more on the
Indians for food since the Indians were very successful farmers and knew how to live off the land.
John Smith's leadership swooped in and saved the colony of Jamestown. He conducted means of
exploring the land and gathering

Why Did Europeans Join The New World?
Why did Europeans come to the New World? Why did they feel that land was there for the taking?
How did they justify their expansion? The Europeans ventured to the New World in a quest for gold,
land, and also animal skin. They believed that with the over–whelming amount of land that was
newly discovered there was certainly room for them. The Europeans found this very justifiable as
they knew there land that was conquerable with their advancement in technology such as guns. Also,
the Europeans saw North America as a great opportunity to transform people to Christianity.
How did generational differences between white settlers and Wampanoag affect the outcome of
colonization? Examine the differences between Massasoit and his son, Philip, as well as Edward
Winslow and his son, Josiah. The differences between the white settlers and Wampanoag people
made it both difficult to trade, but also good for both civilizations as they were able to benefit from
the new goods afforded to each of them. The Wampanoag people were able to benefit from the
surplus of guns they received, while the white settlers were able to send the animal skins they
received back to Europe to benefit the commerce there. Massasoit was more of an elder, during his
time of superiority, than his son Phillip which meant he got a lot more respect from the Wampanoag
people. Phillip lacked the decision making skills his father had as he was sort of forced into duty
with the death of Massasoit. In the film, it shows

British Colonization Of The Americas
British colonization of the Americas began in 1607 in Jamestown, Virginia. It reached its peak when
colonies has established throughout the America. The British ignored america in favor of subduing
and occupying Ireland, which is a promising colony closer to their homeland. In 1558, the half–
century reign of Elizabeth 1 began, England's interest to the other side of the Atlantic grew.
Elizabeth maneuvered through the difficulties of being a female monarch by refusing to marry,
having no kids, and maintaining a reputation for chastity. However, for the next paragraph, I will
initiate on how the British slowly colonized the Americas and how the representation of some of the
women was very important back in this century. First of all, the British which was run by Elizabeth
1 in the 1500s established her country's control of the seas and access to the New World's wealth. Sir
Walter Ralegh, who is one of Elizabeth's "favorite" men has granted dominion over the large,
undefined American territory north of the Spanish lands that Ralegh names Virginia to honor not the
Virgin Mary but the Virgin Queen. Even though Elizabeth did not get married she has a "favorite"
men which she trusted him and sent him to the America. In contrast to the highly Spanish queen,
Elizabeth was a thoroughly worldly monarch (pg24). She abjured the Catholic Church in favor of
heading the church of England, more as a source of political than spiritual identity and authority.
Differently from the Catholic

I Am Post A Review Today Of A Board Game
I thought I'd post a review today of a board game that I bought for my kids this last Christmas. Yes,
I'm aware that was 5 months ago, but it's honestly taken me this long to decide whether I love or
hate it. My family, including my 8yo and my 7yo, really enjoys playing Settlers of Catan, so when I
found out there was a version based on the building of the transcontinental railroad in the United
States, my little homeschooling heart just about burst. The game, Catan Histories: Trails to Rails, is
around the $50 mark, so I hesitated... a lot. I finally caved over the holidays because... learning and
Catan and awesomeness awaited us if I could just fork over the cash. SPECS:
The box says this game is for ages 12+, 3–4 players, and that the game takes about 2 hours. In
comparison, the original Settlers of Catan game says it's for players ages 10+, 3–4 players (but you
can buy expansions for more players), and that the game takes about an hour. REALITY:
We've played the original game with my younger kids without issue. The concepts are not too hard
for them to understand, but I've never met a Catan game that "only" lasted an hour. Ever. It usually
takes us 2–3 hours, even when it's all adults playing and no kids. Basically, I don't believe a word on
the box. Trails to Rails is actually more accurate on the box, but I still don't think a game could be
completed in 2 hours. The 12+ age range is probably a good suggestion, but you know your own
kids. It could be fun for a child

Of Plymouth Plantation William Byrd Summary
William Bradford and William Byrd may share the same first name but that is the length of the
similarities between these two colonial writers. Bradford, a puritan writer, valued religious freedom
above all else, often making the connection back to God and religion in his writings. In his text, Of
Plymouth Plantation, Bradford uses his personal experience to give an account of the first pilgrims
and the hardships they faced in their journey to colonize America. On the other hand, Byrd takes a
more satirical approach, using humor and wit to criticize those same early American settlers in his
publication The History of the Dividing Line. Bradford and Byrd both wrote texts about early
American life. However, the two authors have different purposes ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Bradford uses a bland, matter–of–fact style of writing which is common for the time period in which
he lived. He often avoids long, drawn out literary techniques – instead focusing on clearly stating his
opinions. His tone is especially evident in his description of the Pilgrim's journey across the ocean,
"According to the usual manner, many were afflicted with seasickness" (Bradford). Bradford
chooses to express events as simply as he can, allowing himself to ghost over tedious details to
instead focus on his underlying purpose. Unlike Bradford, Byrd prefers to make use of a more
sarcastic tone in his text, often taking his descriptions into great detail. He pokes fun at influential
and important events, often removing the severity from situations with a humours flare. "Several
repeated misadventures of this kind did for some time allay the itch of sailing to this new world, but
the distemper broke out again" (Byrd). Byrd's writing is compiled of witty lines and blunt remarks
that prove his distaste for the early American settlers. It is clear he disapproves of the Pilgrim's
methods but his words lack the malicious undertone that is clear in Bradford's text when he
mentions practices he does not fully agree

Native Americans Essays
In the early days of English settlement in the American colonies, the Indian–European relationship
of each area was the determining factor in the survival of the newly established colonies. By
working together and exchanging methods of food production and survival, an English colony could
maintain its population and continue to support the arrival of new settlers. However, a colony that
had trouble maintaining ties with their Indian neighbors had a tough time attracting settlers and
adapting to their environment. The role of the Indian helping the white man in North America
played an important part in the survival of the American colonies. In the Jamestown colony, very
few people survived the disease and sickness which accompanied the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In 1620, many Pilgrims died in a very tough winter, but the colony survived because of the help
provided by local Indian groups. Not only did the Indians help, but the two groups were able to set
up trade and exchange methods and supplies. This continued when the Puritans arrived in the late
1620's, but things changed soon after. Again, English disease wiped out the local Indian tribes and
allowed for the continued expansion deeper into the New England woodlands. Because of the
influence and help of the early Indian groups in this area, the English gained critical knowledge and
support to establish a successful colony. Other areas of New England soon developed problems with
Indians. The English settlers of the Connecticut Valley and the Pequot Indians were involved in a
bloody battle, as well as the King Phillips War in Massachusetts and Rhode Island in the 1670's. As
the 1600's progressed, Indians were able to gain technological experience with the higher power
European weapons and resulted in tougher battles for the English. However, other areas remained in
good standing with their locals, such as in Maryland. In the 1630's, two groups of settlers arrived
and set up a settlement on the Potomac River. They established good relations with the Indians, and
as a result, "...experienced no Indian assaults, no plagues, no starving time." (Brinkley 36). The
assistance of Indian groups was essential to the survival of the colonies. The only way to attain the
assistance of

Aboriginal Children and Women are an Impediment to...
Research Topic: The ongoing targeting of Aboriginal Children and Women is a significant
impediment to development in Canada. In my research essay I propose to engage the analytical
concept of intersectionality to critically interpret government–led development initiatives in Canada
and the wider world from a postcolonial/feminist perspective. Thesis Canada is often recognized as
a developed society on the world stage, with elaborate institutions and treaties in place to ensure the
needs and development of Indigenous people are met. Yet, simultaneously Canada exists in a state
with a numerous amount of human rights abuses against Aboriginal women and children. This
dichotomy creates a number of issues in regards to honoring historical documents, but more
importantly – to end the ongoing targeting of Aboriginal Women and Children in Canada. In this
essay, I will address development practice and effectiveness in Canada looking particularly at the
practice of forced sterilization of Metis women in Canada. Drawing on the examples of Maori
maternity, I will situate the struggles of both gendered and ethnic people from dominant discourses
in the international context. Then, l will argue that Canada and wider settler societies not only have
an ethical responsibility to address the ongoing targeting of Aboriginal women and children, but that
addressing these issues is in the best interest of the Canadian government improve the development
indicators to provide a more

What Is The Relationship Between Native American And...
Native Americans and English Settlers in Colonial America
Throughout history people have always been placed in different categories such as good versus evil,
strong versus weak or civilized versus uncivilized. All of these names are based on some individual
viewpoints and their perspective of how history unfolded. The occasions that occurred in New
England amid the 17th century were of basic significance in the historical backdrop of the United
States of America. It was the underlying time of the relations between the Native American and
Anglo–Saxon human advancement and the result of the primary many years of shared contacts
molded and changed the course of history for both societies. The underlying foundations of
American national character

Relationships Among Natives And Europeans
Grecia Loya
United States History
April 14, 2015 Relationships among the Natives and Europeans
The stories regarding the Native Americans and European settlers all commence somewhat similar:
the Natives welcome and help sustain the Europeans in the start. They become an instrumental piece
to the European survival in the Americas. The relationship starts to change, however, as settlers
grow independent. In some instances, when there is only personal gain to be acquired, the
relationship becomes a simple trade relationship. In other instances, relationships between the
Native Americans and Europeans evolve into a drastic feud driven by European imperialistic ideas
to impose political, religious and cultural law on the Natives. England has conquered many
territories and established colonies throughout history. In this English form of colonization, it is
clear that there is an obvious mission to intrude into native customs and force their own. They utilize
the purest form of imperialism– to strip others of their customs and replace it with ones own in order
to expand glory and gain for a nation. The English colonists seeked to expand and establish English
ideas into foreign cultures. In the case with the Native Americans, the English did not see the Native
Indians as equals in anyway possible. They did not acknowledge their religion, particularly because
it was not Christian based, nor their law system, since it was not related to church based laws.
Wherever

Difference Between New England And The Chesapeake Colonies
The difference between the colonies of New England and the Chesapeake region were many. First,
they settlers who immigrated to the new world had different reasons for doing so. For the
Chesapeake colonies, including Virginia and Maryland, profit was the aim. After the introduction of
tobacco to Europe by Columbus at the end of the fifteenth century, there was a large and steadily
growing demand for the crop. Investors in England decided to set up colonies in the Americas for
the purpose of growing and profiting from tobacco. On the other hand, the colonies of New England
were set up primarily for religious reasons. Although there were some that sought profit in New
England, most settlers sought liberty and freedom of worship. English separatists, who vehemently
disagreed with the way the Church of England was set up, left Holland and came to America on the
Mayflower. They landed in modern Massachusetts and established the Plymouth Colony. Rhode
Island was also founded on a religious basis after Roger Williams and his fellow dissenters were
exiled from Massachusetts. It became a haven for Quakers, Jews, Baptists and members of other
minority religions. A second difference in the colonies of the Chesapeake and of New England
comes in the basis of their economies. As mentioned above, Virginia was founded in order to grow
tobacco. Maryland's foremost crop was also tobacco. Also, the way tobacco was cultivated was
important to the Chesapeake colonies. Plantation owners were in

Essay about Significance of Jamestown
What is the significance of Jamestown? "Jamestown introduced slavery into English speaking North
America; it became the first of England's colonies to adopt a representative government; and it was
the site of the first clashes between whites and Indians over territorial expansion. Jamestown began
the tenuous, often violent, mingling of different peoples that came to embody the American
experience." Dr. James Horn A Land As God Made It.
In the 1400's Europe had very little land for agriculture and settlement. The Europeans desired
riches such as gold, luxury food items, land, and timber. None of these products could be produced
in Europe so they had to find these resources elsewhere. This led to a lot of importing and trading
with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1585 he settled about 100 men on Roanoke Island, but they did not settle and returned a year
later. In 1587 he sent another group to settle that included a number of women and children. A
supply ship was sent to the settlers but was delayed by the attack of the Spanish Armada on England
in 1588. Help did not arrive until 1590, but it was too late and there was no one to be found. The
attack of the Spanish Armada was spurred by King Phillip the 2nd. His motives were religious as
England seemed committed to Protestantism as well as for economic and political reasons. An
English fleet of 197 ships were able to conquer the invasion and led to Spain no longer being able to
prevent the English from settling in the New World.
The plan at this time was for English colonies to go to America to spread the Protestant religion and
expand the market for English woolens; this would bring in valuable tax revenues. The American
forests could be used for timber and naval stores to build a bigger navy and merchant marine. Queen
Elizabeth did not condone this as she was too cautious and so settlement was not acted upon until
after her death in 1603. The new king James the 1st granted licenses for two groups of English
merchants to colonize Virginia. The first charter revealed the motives of the king when it spoke of
spreading Christianity and bringing the savages to civility along with the rights to dig, mine and
search for all matters of gold,

Cultural Differences Between Native Americans And English...
The Englishmen were not the first settlers of the New World. Many years before both the Spanish
and the French had claimed parts of North America. England was only in it for land and money.
When the English settlers arrived they did not care about the Native Americans and had little desire
to accept their culture. The leaders of the colonies new they would need the help of the Natives to
survive. During the early years the settlers and Indians got along. The Native Americans would
provide food, clothing, and shelter in exchange for knives or hatchets. The Natives also taught them
to be competent. As the settlers increased their knowledge and started taking more of Natives land
the relationship between them began to diminish. Cultural differences became overwhelming as the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although many colonists wanted to be rid of the Natives not all of them thought the same way.
William Penn proposed a treaty promising of perennial friendship with the Lenni Lenape tribe in
Shackamaxon. The event is not recorded in original primary source documents, and its details as
well as its authenticity have been debated. Although the Puritans and the Quakers were separatists
seeking freedom in the New World, they suffered religious persecution within their own
communities. The main focus is the conflict of culture the Puritans and the Quakers experienced
when they were introduced to Native Americans. Both groups came to the New World because of
their disagreement with the Church of England. The Puritans believed the Church of England was in
need of purification because because they were adopting too many Catholic beliefs. The Quakers
wanted religious freedom for everyone. People were free to believe what they wanted. People from
all over Europe poured into their communities, seeking religious

Cultural Differences Between Native American And The...
After the New World was discovered by the Europeans, the poor British settlers set out to start new
lives and earn steady income in the lands. Although Native American were already living their
separate lives upon the same lands, the British settlers soon called the colonies home. As the two,
vastly different cultures converged, misunderstandings soon followed which erupted into an ongoing
clash of cultures. The interactions between the Native Americans and the early British settlers bred
hostility because of the misunderstanding of cultural differences between the two parties. The
communication styles of the Native Americans and the British settlers were polar opposites which
cultivated confusion and misunderstanding during initial interactions. The ways in which the Native
Americans and the British settlers relayed information was unique to each group. The Native
Americans used eloquent speeches and meaningful metaphors as their way of communicating and
recording history while the British obsessively wrote with paper and pen, practically to the point
where if an event was not written down, it did not transpire. The contrasting approaches to recording
and relaying information confused the opposing party which led to misinterpretations and confusion.
In the early 1700s, the governor of New York, Cadwallader Colden, remarked on the English's
misunderstanding of the Native American spoken word saying, "...Indian speakers employed many
metaphors 'which interpreted by an

English Settlers Vs Indians Analysis
A huge detriment to the long, rocky process of English colonization in the New World was conflict
with the Indians. Before the English settlers and the Indians first met on the James River, both
already held strong ideas of what to expect. Both were confident in their abilities to overcome and
control the other group, and both expected to use the other for a trading opportunity. However, the
English saw the Indians as an advanced, highly developed group, while Indians thought the literal
opposite of the foreigners settling onto their land. Inflexible assumptions between colonists and
Indians were one of the main contributors to violent conflict between the two groups. The colonist's
assumptions towards the Indians were at first respectful; they expected the tribe to be advanced and
highly developed. Even though the colonists knew and respected the power of the Powhatan people,
they still expected to control, bargain with, and convert the natives (Kupperman). Because they were
unknowledgeable of the land and farming, they knew they would have to rely on the natives for
crops in exchange for whatever goods they could supply. Though many English settlers wanted a
peaceful trading relationship, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The only previous contact they had with Europeans was with the Spanish explorers, who captured
Powhatan boys and raised distrust among the tribes (Tayac). Despite this, the Indians still wanted to
set up a trading relationship with English settlers to obtain manufactured English goods they've
never had access to before. Although the initial reaction towards English settlers was one of
wariness and hostility, the Indians quickly took pity on the settlers and gave them land and food.
Also, the Indians knew that if the colonists depended on them for resources, they could use this
support as a control

Jamestown Essay
Jamestown
In the sixteenth century, England was one of the most powerful countries in the world. England was
also in dire need of money at this time. In an effort to alleviate the country's financial burdens, King
Henry VIII decided to seize land owned by the Catholic Church. Henry then sold the already
inhabited land to investors, and its residents were forced out. These people and their descendants
would eventually become some of the fortune–seeking colonists that would settle America during
England's try at Imperialism.
In the early 1600's England need money once again, and this time it decided to by settling the new
land to the west of them. Instead of actually funding ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although the colony was near water and had a good location for shipping goods, it was surrounded
by a swamp and stagnant water. This allowed disease to run rampant. Jamestown only lasted until
1700 when its settlers abandoned it, and moved Williamsburg.
The colonist's primary objective, as mentioned before, was to make money, and also try and drive
out Spanish colonies. None of the colonists concentrated on survival and focused on their search for
prosperity. Because of all the time spent on looking for gold or the route to China, and their lack of
skills, the colonists were not prepared for the harsh upcoming winter. The results were devastating.
During the winter of 1609 – 1610 almost ninety percent of the colony was wiped out, and only 50
out of the 500 colonists survived.
The government of the colony consisted of a governor and 12 council members, all whom were
appointed. The government, named the Virginia Council, had no decision making power at all.
Everything was sent over to England, settled there, and then sent back. This system was
outrageously inefficient and often took several years for anything to be resolved. This absurd and
inept council was another reason the death toll at the colony was so high. They couldn't force people
to work on the colony. Finally, a man by the name of John Smith took control and opened the
settler's eyes. They started

Essay Colonization of America
Colonization of America Upon the European's discovery and colonization of the Americas an
irreversible transformation was triggered. The extreme differences in the cultures of the Europeans
and Native Americans would prove to be fatal to the way of life that existed before European
colonization. It appears that the majority of the actions of the Native Americans towards the new
European colonists were in peace and acceptance. Unfortunately the colonists dreams conflicted
with the views of the Native Americans. The 'free living' philosophy of the Native American's left
them open to an unexpected overtaking by the colonists. The Europeans believed in making a new
world out of America while completely disregarding the fact that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As more people reported about there encounters and opinions of the Native Americans the interests
of the English soon changed. Native Americans were soon portrayed as savage animals because of
the lack of understanding of the Settlers. The culture of the Native Americans was so different from
the culture of the English that the English would soon look at the natives as inferior. The Native
Americans were deemed hostile, bestial, cursed by God, primitive beings with inferior knowledge
and language. Also the English commonly thought of them as crafty, brutal, loathsome, cannibalistic
and promiscuous. These negative images of the Native Americans grew from stories passed from
settler to settler which were commonly misinterpretations with very little truth. The English have
developed a long history of moving in to land foreign to there's and exploiting the local people for
their prosperity. The dealings between English and the Native Americans would prove to be no
different from England's previous dealings foreign lands. In no time the English were in a position
in which they would do whatever it took to claim as much land as they could, even if it meant
fighting with hostile "Indians". Some Englishmen thought it was wrong to claim land which was
already being used, no matter what the culture of the Native Americans was. However the majorities
view was that they were performing a

Colonial American Culture
It will not be an exaggeration to say that before the American revolution, the territory of the future
United States was occupied by a vast number of people of various cultures and origins. The matter is
that the colonial period of the development of America was tough enough, incorporating a
considerable amount of changes and transformations. Needless to say that the latter was due to the
process of unification of the cultural peculiarities and traditions of the four continents such as
Europe, Africa, South America, and North America. It goes without saying that this period gave rise
to an era of freedom. In fact, the relationships of the Americans and the Europeans was primarily
based on the desire to trade with Asia. However, it turned out to become a struggle for power of the
two empires, striving to colonize, conquer and exploit the New World. The matter is that the
inhabitants of those territories were Indian societies with their particular customs and ... Show more
The conflict of interests between the Stuart monarchs Charles I and James I and Parliament led to
the English Civil War in the 1640s. "This long–running battle arose from religious disputes about
how fully the Church of England should distance its doctrines and forms of worship from
Catholicism. The conflict also developed over the respective powers of the king and Parliament, a
debate that produced numerous invocations of the idea of the "freeborn Englishman" and led to a
great expansion of the concept of English freedom." (Foner 85). In general, the last decade of the
seventeenth century was full of crises. The were a vast number of struggles between free and slaves,
rich and poor as well as representatives of various religious communities. The frightening truth is
that the most terrible conflict took place in southern New England between the Indian alliance and
the

Differences Between New England Settlers And Chesapeake...
When the English settled into the New World, they were split up into two sections, the Chesapeake
region and the New England region. Although the English settled both, the two regions were
severely different from each other when they were brought about. The New England and
Chesapeake colonies differed in three ways: their reason for venturing over, economy, and
population. These major differences were what shaped our nation today and what will continue
shaping our nation in the future. When the Mayflower sailed over to the New World, on the boats
were Puritans that were looking for a change in the way that their religion was practiced where the
Chesapeake settlers came over for gold. Alongside the Puritans were the Separatists who ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The gold was never found and the passage through America was given up in hopes of staying alive.
Because the Chesapeake settlers were too interested in gold, they did not settle down and get ready
for the harsh winters to come; leaving them unprotected to the fierce winter. The New England
settlers were settles and ready, but they did loose a few men to the bitter cold, however not as many
as the Chesapeake settlers did. The economy of the two regions also greatly differed because of the
terrain that they landed on. Because the land in the south was much more fertile than in the north,
the southern colonies thrived in rice and tobacco, profiting greatly. In New England the settlers
could not grow anything in the rocky terrain and were forced into fishing, building, and farming.
However, not much farming went on because of the infertile soil. In the Chesapeake slaves were
also a main part of their economy. The slave trade made them very wealthy because of their
closeness to the West Indies. They would be shipped many slaves and then use them to harvest their
crops and plant their land. Soon, the slaves outnumbered white settlers by about four to one. When
the English sailed over to the New World, there were only a handful of them, that is, until slavery
was introduced. While New England was almost all white English settlers Chesapeake was made up
of mostly African American slaves. In New England, the need for slaves was not very high because
of the

Pocahontas And The Powhatan Tribe Summary
The Turbulent Relations of the English and Powhatan Tribe While America today is ruled by
numerous ethnicities, it seems implausible that at one point the majority of its soil was ruled by one
of the lowest percentages of the population today– American Indians. Nowadays one may ponder
exactly what happened to this group, and an outstanding source for this information is Camilla
Townsend's Pocahontas and the Powhatan Dilemma, which describes the relationship between the
English settlers and the Powhatan tribe. Even though their affairs appeared to start out peaceful, they
ended up being extremely inconsistent through the book. To start with, when the English arrived to
Jamestown, it was clear that there was one major advantage that these people had over the Powhatan
tribe, that being their technological advances. The English clearly knew it and so did the natives. At
some points, it seemed that this discrepancy would lead to peace between the two sides as the
English tools would commonly be traded for food of the Powhatan tribe (79). This was a perfect
trade for both sides as the English lacked the ability to successfully farm and the Powhatan tribe
were lacking in advanced technology and weaponry. On the other hand, the upper hand in
technology for the English also resulted in conflict. Townsend said it perfectly: "Powhatan already
knew that the strangers' boats, obvious navigational skills, booming weapons, metal blades, and
armor were cause for serious concern" (24). This obviously brought fear in Powhatan, which kept
him and his people on edge. This fear would result in war with the settlers, which is similar to some
countries' conflicts today and in the past where war has been started by the fear that another force
which is more powerful. Additionally, an important factor in the relationship of the Powhatan tribe
and the English was the land and who owned it. This may have been the most considerable reason to
why these two groups fought. Naturally, when two different groups of human forces find themselves
on the same territory, it doesn't end with perfect terms. The skirmishing between them went on and
off throughout the book, and one could see that when they weren't attacking each other about the

Settlement Of San Antonio And The Defense Of All This New...
"For through observation and exploration of those lands and coasts, both by land and sea, it must be
recognized that these settlements must be the rampart, fortress, and the defense of all this New
Spain." (pg. 1). The author Jesus F. de la Teja takes a objective look of settlement of San Antonio
and its surroundings. His book covers over the course of a period of the 18th Century. His writings
describe the life of the settlers, economics, living conditions, and their use of the land. He does a
superior job of characterizing the early Texas Colonial settlers' daily life. The author uses distinct
unbiased information that rundowns the growth of the settlement of San Antonio. Tejada addresses a
past that encompasses the length of the 18th ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
How livestock were rounded up and then taken on cattle drives. The cattle drives would end at train
stations where the livestock were loaded up. The trains would transport the cattle to meat producing
plants. The author Teja also does an acceptable analysis of the land–use patterns around the Mission
of San Antonio. With the many diverse groups and families settling San Antonio, Teja covers the
diversity the area goes through. Teja could have placed more emphasis in painting a picture that San
Antonio was the focal point in the Northern Boundary lands. I highly endorse this book for a person
looking to study the growth of San Antonio in the 18th Century. "Community in San Antonio de
Bexar did not spring up overnight. It was the product of a Shared struggle for survival among people
who initially had little in common." (pg. 160) According to Chipman, The author Teja is a scholar
who is focused on the formation of the community at San Antonio de Bexar during the 18th Century.
(Chipman) Teja provides a precise overview of the early settlers' norms, beliefs, and attitudes in
occupying San Antonio in an nonpartisan manner. "Permanently settled in 1718, San Antonio began
as a military and missionary outpost on the northern frontier of New Spain." (Chipman) Teja also
captures how the older settlers viewed their relationship with the arrogant Islenos. Chipman further
reflects on Teja's

Modern Day Vegan Research Paper
Modern day vegans
Donald Watson, on 1944 had a meeting with non–dairy vegetarian, Elsie Shrigley, to talk about the
lifestyle and diet of non–dairy vegetarian diets. These pioneers were the first people to discover a
new movement – although resistant. They felt that they needed a new name, something more brief
than "non–dairy vegetarians". "vitan", "dairyban", and "benevore" were some of the rejected words.
They settled on "vegan", because it had the first 3 and the last 2 letters of "vegetarian". In Donald
Watson's words, it marked "the beginning and end of vegetarian".
Despite the fact that vegan diet has been defined early on it was as late as 1949 before Leslie J Cross
said that the vegan society lacked description of veganism and suggested

The Great Divide : How And Why The Apartheid Differ From...
THE GREAT DIVIDE:
HOW AND WHY THE APARTHEID DIFFERED FROM TYPICAL COLONIAL RULE
It is a well–known fact that during European colonial rule, Africans were exposed to a multitude of
injustices including warfare, slavery, and the occupation of their lands by European invaders. In
retrospect, the ashes of traditional African societies are what built thriving European–owned African
mining, agricultural and rubber economies. But nothing that Africa had previously suffered was
quite like the apartheid, which South Africa was exposed to from 1948–1994. The apartheid was a
systematic of racial segregation in South Africa enforced by the all–white National Party with the
goal to "separate South Africa's white minority from its non–white majority, non–whites from each
other, and to divide black South Africans to decrease their political power". In essence, under
apartheid, the rights, associations, and movements of the majority black inhabitants and other ethnic
groups were curtailed, white minority dominance was maintained. This essay explores how the
apartheid mirrored the core values of traditional colonial rule but was still fundamentally influential
in its own way through its fight over land, institutionalized racism, and the consequences of when it
was finally abolished.
The Fight over Land
A major feature of the apartheid that colonial rule has previously failed to achieve prior to the 1950s
was simultaneously mobilize millions of Africans out of

European Interactions With The French, English, And The...
The Indians interactions with the French, English, and the Spanish varied depending on the wants
and needs of the new settlers. The French embraced the Indian culture in order to maintain a good
trade relationship. The English used more of a forceful tactic, forcing the Indians violence. The
history of North America centers around the struggle of England, France, and Spain to gain control
of the continent. Settlers and their governments used different approaches on their efforts to
colonization. These differences lead to advantages and disadvantages that resulted in the New
World's fate. France and Spain were governed by sovereigns whose rule was absolute. The English
colonists were able to govern themselves and had plenty of freedom as long as they followed
English law and were loyal to the king. England strengthened immigration from other nations,
unlike France and Spain. By 1763, the English have defeated France and Spain in the French and
Indian War establishing dominance over North America. October of 1492, Christopher Columbus
and his men landed in the Bahamas Islands. Columbus was originally sent by the king and queen of
Spain to Asia, in search for gold and spices. He was also promised a share of the profit. They were
greeted generously by the natives with food and gifts by a tribe known as the Arawak. Their
kindness led him to believe they would be fine servants and saw them as less than human. He
immediately built a fortress. Columbus and his men went from

Relationship Between Europeans And Native American Colonists
When Christopher Columbus had first arrived in 1492 to the New World, American Indians and
European colonists started interacting with each other. These two very different societies interacting
with one another was caused by the European colonists' desire to expand into the New World and
the land owned by American Indians. Due to the unwillingness to accept the Native people, the
relationship in the New World between these two societies was a one of unease and violence. When
the first European colonists arrived in 1620 on land in the New World, a disaster was forming.
Arriving in what is known today as Massachusetts on The Mayflower, the settlers didn't have
enough experience surviving cold, harsh winters causing almost half of the settlers to die that had
arrived on The Mayflower. This had changed in 1621 with the help of the Native people. The
American Indians had started teaching the English people how to do many things including
harvesting and growing crops. This help from the Native's had led to the first Thanksgiving between
the two groups. These two societies, however, didn't remain friends. The English settlers had kicked
off the American Indians of their own land and tried to make them convert to Christianity. The
English settlers had also brought diseases from Europe causing many Indians to get very sick and
even some die. In 1637, warfare started to erupt between a group of English colonists and an Indian
tribe named Pequot. The English settlers along with a

English Settlers In The 17th Century Essay
In the 17th century, many English settlers immigrated out of England for various reasons. Some
seeked religious freedom, while others seeked wealth. They moved to the New England region
which consisted of Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and the New Jerseys, both East and West.
They also moved to the Chesapeake region which was made up of the Massachusetts Bay Colony,
Plymouth, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Haven. Although these regions were both populated
by english settlers, they were more different than alike. These regions were different in government
establishments, in economy, and religious views. Yet their differences allowed them to attract a
diverse set of individuals, all depending on what they wanted. In 1620, the Separatists that arrived in
Plymouth wrote the Mayflower Compact which was an agreement that all decisions concerning the
government would be made through the choice of the majority. Puritans who immigrated to the
Massachusetts Bay already knew ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some wanted to expand Puritan belief and construct ideal Puritan communities. In the
Massachusetts Bay, political leaders were also religious leaders, like John Winthrop. Settlers in this
region took religion very seriously, and weren't very tolerant with those who didn't follow their
beliefs until the creation of the Act of Toleration in Maryland. This created toleration with those who
believed in Christ and allowed for persecuted Catholics to settle in Maryland. Puritans also believed
in calvinism, which was the idea of predestination meaning everyone's destiny, whether they're
going to heaven or hell, was already chosen for them. However, Pennsylvania was populated by
Quakers who believed in "inner light" which was the idea that God encouraged people to adopt a
more optimistic view on humanity. Quakers weren't as strict as the Puritans, they believed all acts
were sacred if they were committed to

Essay On Early Jamestown Settlers
Before the colony of Jamestown first rooted its foundations in the swampy, disease–ridden James
riverbanks of Virginia in 1607, the Pamunkey tribe of Native Americans had already gathered a
century of knowledge and expectations of the would–be English conquerors that settled Jamestown.
However, the Jamestown settlers proved an unexpected rival for the Pamunkeys and their powerful
emperor Powhatan, and a force he could not have reckoned with based on his early information.
Both the English and Native leaders met on the James with somewhat condescending assumptions
about each other that led to a long history of wary truce and mutual prosperity as well as vengeful
rivalry and all–out war. About a century before the arrival of the first inexperienced ... Show more
Although incompetent and struggling at first, and expecting to rely on the natives for food and
assistance in their settlement in their early years, the English still expected to overpower the
Pamunkeys eventually; an event they saw as an inevitability due to their rapid expansion as a
colony. They expected a thriving and powerful community of natives upon their arrival but also
knew they had the superior weapons and technology. The English wanted to keep their advantages
of a surprising lack of assistance and superior military force, and they trained with weapons in secret
to avoid the Indians gauging their true potential for danger.
As one can imagine, the assumptions on both sides that the other party would be easily dominated
and controlled was grounds for an unstable yet mutually beneficial relationship at the best, and an
all–out bloody fight for survival at the worst. At first, the demand for trade in furs, gold, and pearls
in Europe as well as the Pamunkeys' demand for glass beads and useful tools allowed for a truce
lasting for two years that was strengthened by John Smith's and Powhatan's leadership capabilities
and mutual

The Reasons For The English Settlers Leaving Great Britain
The main reason for the English settlers leaving Great Britain was for the people to have more
religious freedoms. Some of the colonist also did it for wealth, for some it wasn't free to travel and
get a new start on the other side of the world isolated from what they are accustomed to. There are
always different reasons from a person to family as to why they came to America but for the part it
was to be able to freely practice religion the way the colonists wanted to. In the meanwhile the
colonist when coming into contact with the natives considered them savages and needed to be
converted to a true religion, the right one, Protestantism. Even the romanticized Captain John Smith
believed that Powhatan and the natives were savages, when the natives clearly stated they were
fearful as to what would happen to them. Coming to the new world the colonists were extremely
unprepared for the dead of winter and many had died but they had a strong reliance on the Native
Americans to help, unfortunately later on quite a few colonies double crossed them and killed a lot
of the Native American tribes. The English was able to take land because the Native Americans had
no concept of property, they believed it was given to everyone. Of course not every colony was the
same and the way they treated the land, for example people in the Chesapeake had warmer climates
and more fertile soil to offer for farming whereas in New England the soil was rocky and slightly
colder climates which made it

Gordon House Blackstone House
Gordon House was originally called Blackstone House and could accommodate up to 30 guests. The
builder, Alfred Winter, cut a road through to Blackstone Lake in the 1890s to make the muskellunge
more accessible. Mr. Winter was the local postmaster till the railway was put in by Lake Joseph to
Parry Sound. Later he renamed it Gordon House after his admiration of the famous General Gordon
who was killed in 1885 in Khartoum.
The following are excerpts from many write–ups on fishing, especially for muskie, on Blackstone
Lake, before the lake was too civilized and fished. Years are boldfaced for convenience.
The first documented case of fishing on Blackstone Lake occurs before even the first settler arrived
or the lake surveyed. It is a brief letter ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On inquiry at a cabin we learned he had found a boat and passed down the lake and would meet us
at the portage, so we pushed on as it was a matter of importance to reach the carry very soon, as the
fast increasing darkness would make it impossible to find the trail in the woods. Arrived at the
portage we hastened over, leaving all that could not be carried at one trip to be returned for in the
morning, and found M. coming across Portage Lake to meet us, accompanied by a sturdy settler
whom he had found living on the shore of Blackstone Lake. The addition to our force enabled us to
get all the camp traps over to the shore of Portage Lake. This lake is a beautiful oval sheet of water
half a mile in greatest diameter, with high and densely forest covered banks, and lays between Otter
and Blackstone

Exploring The Life Of Pocahontas
In this paper I hope to explore the life of Pocahontas. Pocahontas is quite famous in elementary
school classrooms. This is because her story fits within the larger story of the colonization of
America. Also, her love affair with John Smith made a good Disney movie. How much of what I
know about her life comes from Hollywood, and how much of what I know about her life comes
from reality? I will examine an academic database source to find out. Pocahontas was born in 1596
to Indian chief Powhatan around the Jamestown, Virginia colony. Christopher Clausen, of American
Scholar academic journal says in his piece titled, "the familiar story of Pocahontas was mirrored by
that of a young Englishman given as a hostage to her father" about ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Smith said, "At the minute of my execution, she hazarded the beating out of her own brains to save
mine; and not only that, but she so prevailed with her father, that I was safely conducted to
Jamestown; where I found about eight and thirty miserable, poor, and sick creatures, to keep
possession of all those large territories of Virginia". Pocahontas would have been 11 at the time of
her intervention. These words have often been doubted by experts, but have generally been
accepted. If this is true, then Pocahontas displayed an awesome amount of selflessness, bravery, and
initiative that was far beyond her time. These are commonly known events. What is usually untold
about Pocahontas is what comes next. A few years later Powhatan sent his daughter to Jamestown as
a gift of goodwill. With this gift, relations improved drastically between the settlers and the Native
Americans. Apparently, Pocahontas was fascinated with the English people. Pocahontas may have
regarded John Smith as sort of a father figure. She also functioned as a key bridge between the
colonists and the Indians, so that the colonists could have aid in times of starvation. Smith never
married anyone, and received serious gun shot wounds in 1609. He went back to England and died
five years later. The colony of Jamestown fell into disarray and Pocahontas returned to her father.
The relationship between

Conflict Between Native Indians And The White English...
Although white European settlers and the native Indians had existed moderately peaceful for around
40 years pressures rose in the mid–seventh century. Conflict arose due to decline in Indian
territories, population, and their cultural integrity. These differences ultimately lead to conflicts in
which collectively became known as King Philip's War. What types of complaints did the Indians
have against the settlers? How were the Indians expected to survive if the settlers kept taking their
land? The primary sources in this collection of source documents touch upon on what each group
(Indian or white settlers) did to survive: an excerpt from a narrative written by John Easton, a
second hand account written by Thomas Church, a report written to the English leaders by Edward
Randolph, a petition written by an Indian named William Nahton, and an excerpt of an account from
a book written by Mary Rowlandson. These documents illustrate the main causes that sparked the
war between the Native Indians and the white English settlers, narratives written by both sides to
find peaceful solutions, and actual accounts of people who survived the conflict. The second hand
account written about Benjamin Church's meeting with the Indian group known as the Sakonnet
Indians displays that the Indians knew their only chance of survival was to fight while the report
written to English leaders by Randolph suggest that the settlers who viewed the Indians as
uncivilized had ultimately forced the Indians

A Walk through the Peaceful Valley: A Glance at the...
A Walk Through the Peaceful Valley: A Glance at the History of Arcadia, Nebraska
As you walk down the streets of Arcadia, Nebraska, you look from side to side and see nothing more
than a quiet little town. What you probably aren't aware of is the history behind this "little town".
Arcadia is built off of determination, character, and distinctiveness. As you make your way down
Main Street, you start to grasp a glimpse of the past. Arcadia, Nebraska is a village with quite a story
to tell. Not many people know how Arcadia was founded or even how it came to be. Arcadia has
dealt with struggles and overcome tragedies, whereas most towns simply would have died away. In
addition to the charm of Arcadia's perseverance, there are also many fun ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This town is significant, because it is where most of Arcadia's early inhabitants came from. Most
were people from Lee's Park that had moved so they could be close to the railroad that was built to
run through Arcadia. When Arcadia first became a town, on October 3, 1885, the town shared a
school with Lee's Park. (A View of the Valley 25). As Arcadia's population grew, the demand for a
school within the town itself became a constant demand, and eventually the two towns split the
school. As a result, Lee's Park diminished population–wise and continued spiraling downward until
the town was completely gone. By about 1890, Arcadia's population had climbed to nearly 429
people. (A View of the Valley 25). Businesses began popping up all around town and people began
to settle in and make a life for themselves in this peaceful valley. By 1900, there were over 35 local
businesses. Some of these businesses include a barber shop, bowling alley, variety store, bank,
lumber yard, two grocery stores, two drug stores, and two cafés. Just as people began to settle in, the
town began to test the perseverance of the inhabitants, by throwing struggles at them in every way
possible. The struggles that Arcadia has overcome are absolutely enormous. Before Arcadia became
a town, the early settlers of the land were given a taste of the natural forces Arcadia can give out.
Right away the primary pioneers dealt with grasshoppers obliterating everything in sight.

Relationships Between English Settlers And Native Americans
Relationships between English settlers and Native American tribes were central to both the
successes and the failures of the early English colonies in America. Although conflict often
characterized relationships between the so–called "Indians" and the English, many of the initial
colonies owed their survival and successes to the natives. The Native Americans were valuable
trading partners, occasional allies, and aid in sickness and famine. However, various conflicts
between tribes and settlers lead to attacks, murders, abductions, and even war. In other parts of
America, natives were abused and sold into slavery by the Spanish, while treated as allies and
partners in trade by the French. English relationships with the American Indians ... Show more
The colonists were dependent on the Indians for food and guidance, but the natives were
increasingly troubled by the violence of the English and the signs they had seen. Foreign diseases
swept through Native American towns, and a neighboring tribe decided to cut off supplies to the
settlers. Hearing rumors of an impending attack, colonists decided to preemptively strike, storming
the village and beheading the chief. English relief ships with fresh supplies were delayed, and by the
time they reached the Roanoke colony, the settlers had almost starved. Undeterred by the shaky
Indian–English relations and near starvation, a fresh batch of settlers was sent to revive the Roanoke
colony in 1587. After the slaughter of one of their men, the English attacked a hostile village, only
to accidentally kill friendly Indians, the Croatoans. When the long–delayed ship carrying supplies
from England arrived three years later, the settlement was abandoned, the only clue as to their fate
being the word Croatoan carved on a tree. However, there was no sign of struggle, indicating the
settlers had relocated. They were never seen again, earning the nickname of "The Lost Colony".
During these attempts at establishing a colony on Roanoke Island the Native Americans grew wary
and distrustful of the English, something that would be reflected in future colonization attempts. The
first permanent English colony was planted roughly ten years later in Jamestown,

Effect Of The Environment On Western Settlers Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Chelsea Porter

More from Chelsea Porter (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Effect Of The Environment On Western Settlers Essay