Instructions: Answer the five (5) questions below. Your answers should be well thought out and properly structured to represent systematic thinking. Your answers should integrate as much of our material from this course as possible to support your responses. Show me that you “know your stuff” based on the material covered during our class (no outside material). Each question is worth 20 points. I wish you well!
1. You have just been hired for a newly created position, the Director of Organizational and Leadership Development, in a medium size service organization. During your first day on the job the CEO sits down with you and shares, “We are growing so fast coming out of the downturn that we are struggling to create an effective management development system for our leaders and they are struggling. I want you to give me a brief report on the following key issues and try to keep it responsibly concise.”
a. Develop a model for management development that can be diagramed and described on one page that point out how to best improve manager/leader performance.
b. What specific things should your organization be doing to increase the likelihood of developing high performance, results-oriented managers and conversely, to reduce the likelihood of managerial failure?
c. What factors do you anticipate might prevent your organization from being successful at developing the managerial talent its need to be successful? What are the barriers? What will you do about it?
[Your response to this question should be presented and formatted in a fashion that you would want you new boss to read and absorb].
2. Based on our discussions and readings:
a. Why do managers really fail to get results for their organizations?
b. Do you think that managerial failure will be more or less common in the future?
c. Will managers be more or less likely to recover their careers after managerial failure in the future?
Explain your position in each of these responses (a-c).
d. Explain why getting results is so important to a manager’s career and what they must do to get better results in 400 words or less!
3. Several of our reading and discussions have made very strong cases for the fact that developing effective human resources can greatly enhance organizational performance and success.
a. Identify and describe ten (10) key organizational practices that can be used to enhance organizational performance and the key management actions necessary to support and sustain these efforts.
b. The performance equation states that “Performance= f (Ability x Motivation x Support). Explain how the ten (10) practices you identified fit into this equation.
c. Explain why each of these various groups might fail to embrace/support these efforts:
· Top management
· Middle management
· First-line supervision
· Members of the work force
4 . Explain how you will use what you learned about groups or teams to get results in any
organization you work for in the ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Instructions Answer the five (5) questions below. Your answers .docx
1. Instructions: Answer the five (5) questions below. Your answers
should be well thought out and properly structured to represent
systematic thinking. Your answers should integrate as much of
our material from this course as possible to support your
responses. Show me that you “know your stuff” based on the
material covered during our class (no outside material). Each
question is worth 20 points. I wish you well!
1. You have just been hired for a newly created position, the
Director of Organizational and Leadership Development, in a
medium size service organization. During your first day on the
job the CEO sits down with you and shares, “We are growing so
fast coming out of the downturn that we are struggling to create
an effective management development system for our leaders
and they are struggling. I want you to give me a brief report on
the following key issues and try to keep it responsibly concise.”
a. Develop a model for management development that can be
diagramed and described on one page that point out how to best
improve manager/leader performance.
b. What specific things should your organization be doing to
increase the likelihood of developing high performance, results-
oriented managers and conversely, to reduce the likelihood of
managerial failure?
c. What factors do you anticipate might prevent your
organization from being successful at developing the managerial
talent its need to be successful? What are the barriers? What
will you do about it?
[Your response to this question should be presented and
2. formatted in a fashion that you would want you new boss to
read and absorb].
2. Based on our discussions and readings:
a. Why do managers really fail to get results for their
organizations?
b. Do you think that managerial failure will be more or less
common in the future?
c. Will managers be more or less likely to recover their careers
after managerial failure in the future?
Explain your position in each of these responses (a-c).
d. Explain why getting results is so important to a manager’s
career and what they must do to get better results in 400 words
or less!
3. Several of our reading and discussions have made very strong
cases for the fact that developing effective human resources can
greatly enhance organizational performance and success.
a. Identify and describe ten (10) key organizational practices
that can be used to enhance organizational performance and the
key management actions necessary to support and sustain these
efforts.
b. The performance equation states that “Performance= f
(Ability x Motivation x Support). Explain how the ten (10)
practices you identified fit into this equation.
c. Explain why each of these various groups might fail to
embrace/support these efforts:
3. · Top management
· Middle management
· First-line supervision
· Members of the work force
4 . Explain how you will use what you learned about groups
or teams to get results in any
organization you work for in the future.
5. a. Explain how and why organizational improvement and
change initiatives should be run to achieve desirable outcomes.
b. According to the “theory of emotional intelligence,” how
does a manager go about acquiring these important and diverse
leadership skills?
c. How does a leader become more results-oriented? (Not what
do they have to do to get better results but how do they become
a person capable of doing those things consistently and doing
them well.)
d. What specific things should a leader do to create a
motivational environment for the people that work for
him/her/they?.
M8-22 ANALYTICS o TEAMS • ORGANIZATIONS •
SKILLS .fÿy' ÿ,oÿ ()V)g
The Strategy That Wouldn't Travel
by Michael C. Beer
4. It was 6:45 P.M. Karen Jimenez was reviewing the
notes on her team-based productMty project tbr
what seemed like the hundredth time. I31 two days,
she was scheduled to present a report to the senior
management group on the project's progress. She
wasn't at all sure what she was going to say.
The project was designed to improve productiv-
it3, and morale at each plant owned and operated by
Acme Minerals Extraction Company. Phase one--
implemented in early 1995 at the site in Wichita,
I(amsas--looked like a stunning, success by the mid-
dle of 1996. Productivity and mo[ÿale soared, and
operating and maintenance costs decreased signifi-
cantly. But four months ago, Jimenez tried to
duplicate the results at the project's second
target--the plant in Lubbock, Texas--and some-
thing went wrong. The techniques that had worked
so well in Wichita met with only moderate success
in Lubbock. ProductMty improved marginally and
costs went down a bit, but morale actually seemed
to deteriorate slightl): Jimenez was stumped,
approach to teamwork and change. As it turned
out, he had proved a good choice. Daniels was a
hands-on, high-energy, charismatic businessman
who seemed to enjoy media attention. Within his
first year as CEO, he had pretty much righted the
floundering company by selling oft:some unrelated
lines of business. He had also created the share-
services deparnnent--an internal consulting organ-
ization providing change management, reengineer-
ing, total quailB, management, and other
services--and had rapped Jimenez to head the
group. Her first priority Daniels told her, would be
5. to improve productiviB, and morale at the com-
pany's five extraction sites. None of them were
meeting their projections. And although Wichita
was the only site at which the labor-management
conflict was painfiflly apparent, Daniels and Jimenez
both thought that morale needed an all-around
boost. Hence the team-based productivity project.
She tried to "helicopter up" and think about
the problem in the broad context of the com-
pany's history. A few ),ears ago, Acme had been in
bad financial shape, but what had really brought
things to a head--and had led to her current
dilemma--was a labor relations problem. Acme
had a wide variety of labor requirements For its
operations. The company used highly sophisti-
cated technologB employing geologists, geophysi-
cists, and engineers on what was referred to as the
"brains" side of the business, as well as skilled and
semi-skilled labor on the "brawn" side to run the
extraction operations. And in the summer of
1994, brains and brawn clashed in an embarrass-
ingly public way. A number of engineers at the
Wichita plant locked several union workers out of
the offices in 100-degree heat. Although most
Acme employees now felt that the incident had
been blown out of propo,'tion by the press, the
board of directors had used the bad publicity as an
excuse to push out an aging chief executive and
bring in new blood in the fbrm of'Bill Daniels.
The board had asked Daniels to lead the com-
pany in part because he came fi'om a prominent
management consulting firm that was noted [br its
At the time, Jimenez Felt up tO the task. She had
6. joined Acme in her late twenties with an MBA and
a few years at a well-known consulting firm under
her belt. She had been at the hehn of more than a
Few successful change efforts. And in the ten years
since she joined Acme, she had gained experience
in a number ofmidlevel positions.
With a hardworking team of her own in toÿq
Jimenez commenced work. First, she decided on a
battle plan. For several reasons, Wichita seemed
ideal as an inaugural site. Under the ÿbrmer CEO,
the site had spent long periods of time on the mar-
ket. The plant consistently tmderpertbrmed, and
the old regime wanted to be rid of it. Periodically,
frustrated by the lack of what he considered seri-
ous of Rrs, the fbrlner CEO ordered improvement
programs, which were ahvays abandoned alter a
short time, Jimenez believed that the failures of
those change programs were predictable: expecta-
tions had been unrealistic,_there had been little
commitment fi'om management, and the improve-
ment-project team members had been given little
authority to implement changi:s. As she consid-
ered her mission at Wichita, Jimenez was certain
that her new political clout combined with her
experience as a consultant would make the project
manageable. Moreover, she reasoned that because
many previous efforts had Failed, her efforts would
look doubly good if the project succeeded. If it
Module 8 . Mana oinÿ CbalLtÿ: in OiLmzuizatiems M8-23
failed, the situation could be positioned with the
proper spin as an intractable set of problems tlÿat
7. no one could solve.
The biggest problem at Wichita was clearly that
labor and management didn't get along. As a
result, costs to maintain the heavy equipment were
significantly out'of line with those incurred by
other operations. Wichita's high fixed costs and
razor-thin margins meant that every dollar saved in
maintenance was a dollar tbr profit. While operat-
ing costs were high, too, the3: weren't nearly as
high as maintenance costs.
]imenez set about fixing the labor relations
problem. And although things hadn't improved as
smoothly or as quickly as she had hoped, Wichita
was a great success. The problem was, Daniels had
wasted no time in touting the earl), successes to
stakeholders. In fÿct, not long at'ter the Wichita
project had gotten under way, he described it at
great length in a speech to the Financial Analysts'
Society on Wall Street. With characteristic embel-
lishment, he cited the project as a vision tbr the
fiÿttlre of Acme--indeed, he called it tl, Je organiza-
tion for the nventy-first century. He all but told
the analysts that the Wichita model would soon be
rolled out through the entire enterprise.
limenez had been furious--and more than a little
fi'ightened. She didn't want her fi:et held to the fire
like that; she knew that reproducing Wichita's suc-
cess might not be possible and that even if it were, it
might not be accomplished in a cookie-cutter i-:ash-
ion. In fhct, she had tried to let Daniels know of her
fhelings on more than a few occasions, long before
he spouted off'to Wall Street. She had met with him
8. and sent him reports, e-mail, and memos. The mes-
sage, it seemed, had fhllen on deaf ears.
motion, Wichita had shox,lÿ little coordination or
COnlmunication anlong these groups.
Jimenez knew that she had at least one stroke of
good luck in Wichita in the tbrm of David Keller.
Keller, a 39-year Acme veteran, had been looking
fbr one last job betbre he retired, and he wanted it
to be in Wichita, where his l-'amily had lived for
eight years earlier in his career. He wanted to retire
there. Keller was videly respected in the company
and Jimenez genuinely liked him. So, with the
blessing of Daniels and the other senior managers,
she had appointed him p,'oject leader.
She smiled as she thought about Keller. He was a
Korean War vet who had relocated several times for
Acme, serving in just about every possible line and
staff" position. He joined the company in 1957 and
was immediately baptized in the dust and heat of
North Afi'ica, where the COlnpany had set up opera-
tions soon after World War !I. Keller was a link to
Acme's heady past, when it had thought nothing of
clearing Allied land mines planted in the desert in its
drive to expand. It struck Jimenez tlÿat Keller had
joined the company befbre she was born.
Inside Wichita
Jimenez looked at the clock again: it was now
7:30: The $75 million project that could bl'ing
Aclne into the twenty-first century was listing, she
mused, and so was her career. She looked at her
computer screen for inspiration, but it was blank.
9. Maybe if" she reviewed the success story once
more. She opened the file marked "Wichita" and
studied the work-process flowchart. The site had
been unexceptional in almost every way. There
were thl'ee fimctional groups: operations, which
consisted of hourly workers who operated and
maintained the extraction equipment; "below
ground," a group composed of engineers, geolo-
gists, and geophysicists who determined where
and how to drill for the desired minerals; and
"above ground," a group of engineers in charge of
cursor), refinement and transportation of the min-
erals. Before the team project ha&been put in
Jimenez thought about the Wichita project's
rough spots. One of them had been the institution
of a monthly "problem chat," an optional meting
open to all staff to discuss unresolved problems. No
one attended the first one. She and Keller sat there
nervously, together eating six doughnuts before
she called a secretary and had them carted away.
But over time, people began to sho' up. After
about fbur months, the meetings were well-
attended, lively problem-solving discussions that
actually produced SOlne improvements. In one case,
a maintenance worker explained to a thcilities engi-
neer that one of the standard equipment configura-.
tions was f:ailing as a result of high levels of heat and
sand contamination, resulting in occasional down-
time. With Keller mediating, the complaint had
been taken well, without the usual fi'iction. The
engineer easily fabricated a new configuration more
suitable to the conditions, and downtime was 'irtu-
all), elilninated. Such insights were common at the
10. problem chats. Previously no organizational mecha-
nism had existed for capturing solutions or transfer-
ring them to other parts of the operation.
j'imcnez and Keller then introdtlced teams to
"select a problem and implement a tailored solu-
tiou," or SPITS. These were ad-hoc groups made
up of members fi'om each of the functional a,'eas.
The groups were formed to work on a specific
project identified in a problem chat; they were dis-
banded when the problem was solved. It was the
implementation of SPITS teams that led some
eight months later to a wholesale reorganization of
the Wichita work site. ]imenez believed that
SPITS had been a breakthrough that had shown
M8-24 ANALYTICS • TEAMS ÿ ORGANIT_ATIOIÿIS
, SKILLS
her how to boost productivity and morale--the
goal tlÿr Daniels had set lÿ)r her. The program had
given cross-filnctional teams of 12 to 15 people
fi'om operations, above ground, and below
ground the responsibility and authority to address
problems as they occurred without seeking the
approval of management.
Jimencz reminded herself that even after
SPITSÿ there were still some rocky moments in
Wichita. Solne engineers resented having to work
alongside operations personi}el. They told Keller,
"These miners don't understand why we do what
re do." Likewise, some operations staff balked at
having to work with engineers who "knew how to
11. mine only on a computer screen."
But one },ear into the pilot, things began to
hum. People weren't just working together, they
were socializing together. At one of the problem
chats, an operations worker jokingly suggested that
the brains and the brawn duke it out once a week to
get rid of the tensions. Keller jumped on the joke
and had T-shirts made that said BRAINS AND
BRAWN; he then challenged the groups to square
of'f weekly in a softball game. EaHy into the first
game, a 200-pound miner slammed into a thin,
wiry engineer at home plate, and limenez, watch-
ing fi'om the sidelines, was sure that her corporate
change plan had just been called out. But the engi-
neer simply d usted hilnsclfofl-; laughing and swear-
ing at the same time. At the next game, the
engineer showed tip wearing knee and shoulder
pads, and Jimcnez heard both his colleagues and
the operations guys laughing. She knew something
had changed. Later that night at a bar, the beer
flowed in massive quantities, but she happily picked
up the check. Her BItAINS AND BRAWN shirt
now lntmg on her of'rice all--a symbol of everything
that was wrong and everything was possible.
Cookie-Cutter Conundrum
Jimencz again came back to the present. She
closed the file, got tip ab,'uptly, and grabbed her
cdat., She needed some air and some food and
derided to walk the two blocks to the local sand-
with joint. She felt a little like an inventor who had
just dcvel{Jped a great new invention that is certain
to make the compan.v tons of money. <'That's
great!" an imaginary boss replies. "Now give me
12. another 50 joist like it!"
As she walked, she tried to think objectively
about the I,ubbock site. Lubbock was in better
shape than Wichita to begin with, but not by
much. Operating costs there were too high, and
the plant rarely met its production goals. Acme
had considered divesting itself" of Lubbock on
more than one occasion. When Jimenez initially
planned the team-based productivity rollout, she
had thought of Lubbock as a beta site; kinks fiom
Wichita would be worked out there, and then the
plan would be rolled out to the rest of the corn-
pan}, over a two-year period. The shared-services
department didn't have the staff" to oversee
Wichita's fine-tuning and concentrate on Lubbock
as well, so Jimenez assigned only one of her top
internal consultimts, Jennifer Peterson, and two of
Peterson's staff to the Lubbock PrOject. She then
engaged Daniels' foriner consulting firm and
assigned Dave Matthews, a vice president of the
firm, on-site responsibility.
Bad news seemed to dog Jimenez at every turn.
For example, Keller declined to be a part of the
team. Mystified and a little hurt, Jimenez turned
up the pressure a bit, hinting that it might look
bad for him not to work on the Lubbock site.
Keller was resolute.
"Look, Karen," he had said. "I'm 63 },ears old.
My kids are all out of the house. I've relocated ten
times for the company, but I plan to retire soon. I
don't want to spend the next three years burning
myself out traveling all over the cotlntry. I'm stay-
13. ing in Wichita. If I have to, I'll take earl}, retire-
ment and walk." Although Jimenez thought he
might be bluffing, she couldn't afford to call his
hand. Keller had many powerfnl allies in the com-
pany and was viewed as the prototypical Acme
man; his latest success with the Wichita turn-
around was seen as yet another in a series of
impressive achievements. Jimenez knew she
couldn't afford to lose his experience and knoxsd-
edge; if she couldn't get him thll time, she would
do her best to pick his brain and transfer his
knowledge to a project team.
Keller had promised full access to his entire
staff; the consultants could interview and brain-
storm and strategize all they wanted. Jimenez,
Peterson, and Matthews took advantage of that
opportunitB but even extensive interviews with
Keller and his staff hadn't yielded any truly valu-
able insights. No matter how carefully Jimenez
and her group tried to recreate the circumstances
and techniques that had worked so well in Wichita,
they made very little progress. The Lubbock
employees just didn't seem to react with the same
enthusiasm as the Wichita workers had. Because
no one was showing tip for the problem chats--
despite the "selling" of the meetilÿgs' benefits by
Jimenez, Peterson, and Matthews--attendance
was made mandatory. It was true that Jimenez's
team had attempted to reduce 'the cycle time and
"total time to investment recovery" of the project,
but that goal hadn't seemed unreasonable.
Jimenez thought that there would be fiewer mis-
takes in Lubbock and that the project would need
tess time and fewer resources than Wichita had.
14. Module 8 , MamTgiHg ChaHgc iJl OrqaMzatiolls M8-25
)
f
1
|
If" anything, just the opposite occurred. Prob-
lems never encountered ill the Wichita project cre-
ated havoc at Lubbock. One particularly vexing to
Jimenez was that the Lubbock workers refused to
engage in any of" the team-building exercises and
events developed fbr them by the project team.
The softball games that had been played with
enthusiasnl in Wichita were skipped by the Lub-
bock crowd until the project team finally off'ered
to spring for food and beer. Even then, there was
more eating than playing. I felt like I was bribing
prison inmates, Jimenez remembered.
e
s
l
I
2r
t
expected, the improvements weren't enough--and
Jimenez knew it.
15. There had been some improvements. The site
had begun to meet its weekly goals more. consis-
tently and had seen some reduction in operations
and maintenance costs. Normally, Jimenez would
have been complimented on a job well done, but in
the context of'what had gone bef;ore and what was
She returned to her office, still without all
answer. Full and generous fimding had been
approved fbr the team-based productivity project by
the steering committee at the personal request of,
Bill Daniels; this level off filnding was not easily
come by at Acme. How could she convince him--
without looldng like a f'ailure--that the project
couldn't be rolled out with the speed and grace he
envisioned? What's more, it was clear' that stalling
the implementation would dull some o}: the pro-
ject's luster and in all likelihood jeopardize fimding.
She did think that the project would work, given
time. But she wasn't exactly sure how. And any waf-
fling might get her crucified by her colleagues.
The meeting with the senio," managers was rap--
idly approaching. What could she say to them?
}.
Graded Case Analysis #2:
Case Study “The Strategy That Wouldn’t Travel”
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
Where would you place the Wichita change initiative on the
four dimensions of change initiatives?
16. What were the main problems at the Wichita facility that
Jimenez’s change initiative addressed? Why was the initiative
successful at the Wichita facility?
What are the problems at Lubbock? Why is the change
initiative not as successful at the Lubbock facility?
What actions should Jimenez take immediately? If you were
brought in to advise Jimenez, what actions would you
recommend to her to move the change initiative forward at
Lubbock? Within the company as a whole?
20. 4. Hold people accountable and motivate them to increase
their performance? __________
5. Clarify performance expectations with all my employees?
__________
6. Foster cooperation and teamwork with the people who need
each other to get results?__________
7. Use clearly defined and balanced performance metrics to
measure performance? __________
8 Work at continually developing and nurturing key
working relationships? __________
9. Ensure that my people are properly trained and educated to
get results? __________
10. Employ appropriate and systematic planning practices?
__________
11. Work to rapidly remove performance barriers that get in
the way of getting results? __________
12. Keep myself up-to-date with the skills necessary to be
effective in my job? __________
13. Provide ongoing performance feedback and coaching to my
people? __________
14. Take extreme care in staffing the operation?
__________
15. Proactively clarify my value-added organizational role?
__________
23. are. Just keep your eyes open.”
After three weeks on the job, you’ve identified two
specific managers whose performance is not up to even
minimally acceptable standards. Pat Roberts has been with the
organization for eight years as the Manager of Clerical Support
Services. Pat’s performance has been poor for quite some time
according to workers in the department. John Rand has been the
Manager of Information Processing for less than six months and
his department is not operating effectively at present. Your job
is to take action.
Your Action
Before approaching these individuals to discuss how to get
them on track, you decide to sit down and make a list of
potential/probable causes for their performance failures. Be
very specific in identifying the issues that you believe might be
contributing to their difficulties. You will be asked to share
your findings with the group.
1.
________________________________________________
___________
2.
________________________________________________
___________
3.
________________________________________________
___________
4.
________________________________________________
___________
5.
27. I want you to know why I am leaving after 11 years
of hard work and dedication. I reached a
point where I hated to come to work. It started to make me
feel sick all the time and I realized life
is too short to make myself sick for nothing. I worked
hard but nobody ever noticed unless there
was a problem and then jumped all over me to protect their
own ass. I worked in three different
departments and it was always the same, we were
disorganized and always fighting to keep on
schedule and that gave me more stress than I needed. It
didn’t have to be that way but management
would not listen to us. I had suggestions but my boss, Mr.
_____ told me to just work or that he’d
look into it and nothing ever came from it. He made me feel
dumb and at first I didn’t like myself,
but then I didn’t like him or his boss either. They both think
their sh_t doesn’t stink. Hey, why am
I being asked to give up pay and benefits when management
makes lots of money. I read in the paper
our president makes over a million bucks. What makes him so
high and mighty? I don’t have another
job yet but I just had to get out of here or else go crazy, my
work caused me big problems at home.
Nobody will probably even read this letter because I am just a
peon, but if anybody does, remember I
never missed work, I did as I was told, and tried to help the
company in my own way and was treated
like a dog. I feel angry and don’t know what else to say.
John
________________
Questions:
1. What is the first question you ask yourself when you
39. 45
KEY MOTIVATIONAL THEORIES – A PRIMER
A. NEED THEORIES:
1. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs – There is a hierarchy of
needs –
physiological, safety, social, esteem, and self-
actualization; as each need is
substantially satisfied, the next need becomes
dominant.
Bottom
Line:________________________________________________
___
2. Two-Factor Theory (a.k.a. Motivation-Hygiene
Theory)
a) Intrinsic/motivation factors are related to job
satisfaction, while
extrinsic factors are associated with dissatisfaction.
Extrinsic/hygiene factors – such as company policy
and administration, supervision,
and salary – that when adequate in a job, placate workers.
When these factors are
adequate, people will not be dissatisfied.
Bottom
Line:________________________________________________
___
3. ERG – There are three groups of core needs:
existence, relatedness, and growth.
a) Existence – providing our basic material existence
requirements.
40. b) Relatedness – the desire to maintain important
interpersonal
relationships.
c.) Growth – an intrinsic desire for personal
development.
Bottom
Line:________________________________________________
___
4. McClelland's Needs Theory – Achievement, power,
and affiliation are three important needs
that help explain motivation.
a) Need for achievement – the drive to excel, to
achieve in relation to a
set of standards, to strive to succeed.
b) Need for power – the need to make others
behave in a way that they
would not have behaved otherwise.
c) Need for affiliation – the desire for friendly and
close interpersonal
relationships.
Bottom
Line:________________________________________________
___
B. Theory X and Theory Y
1. Theory X – The assumption that employees dislike
work, are lazy, dislike responsibility, and
must be coerced to perform.
a) Employees inherently dislike work and when
possible will attempt to avoid it.
b) Since employees dislike work, they must be
coerced, controlled or threatened with
punishment to achieve goals.
42. C. Goal Setting – the theory that specific and difficult
goals, with feedback, lead to higher
performance.
a) S__________
b) M_________
c) A__________
d) R__________
e) T__________
Bottom
Line:________________________________________________
___
D. Reinforcement Theory – Behavior is a function of its
consequences – shaping behavior using
appropriate “reinforcers” helps motivate an
individual to behave appropriately.
a) Positive reinforcement
b) Punishment/Negative reinforcement
Bottom Line:
___________________________________________________
E. Equity Theory - Individuals compare their job inputs
and outcomes with those of
others and then respond to eliminate any
inequalities.
a) Distributive justice – Perceived fairness of the
amount and allocation of rewards
among individuals.
b) Procedural justice – Perceived fairness of the
process used to determine the
distribution of rewards.
Bottom Line:
49. performance. Ask people to describe accountability and why
accountability is so important to an organization’s success. The
answer is fairly obvious in that if people are not held
accountable there left to their own desires which can be all over
the place. When employees are held accountable it lets them
know that what they are doing is important. The key is that
managers need to hold employees accountable and effective
fashion.
58
Key Question: What is it about accountability that, when
properly applied, has a positive effect on each of the following
key indicators?
Employee motivation?
Morale?
Employee expectations?
Engagement?
Teamwork?
Reward systems?
Continuous improvement?
Overall performance?
64. accumulated in the US. Ask them if it works for the Indian
workforce and if so which ones?
Figure 1: The Employee Ability and Motivation Coaching
Matrix
High
Employee Ability
Low
Low High
Employee Motivation
Category 3
COACH AS MOTIVATOR
High ability
Low motivation
The “Underachieving” Employee
Category 1
COACH AS NURTURER
High ability
High motivation
The “Dream” Employee
Category 4
COACH AS MIRACLE WORKER
79. performance improvement integration process with high hopes
as a division. It was a major activity aimed at improving
performance across all of our various facilities. It sounded like
a worthwhile initiative and I was very excited to take the lead.
But in retrospect, we never really articulated what we were
trying to accomplish in realistic, measurable terms and we
struggled with buy-in from the start.
We quickly created an improvement process and tools that
everybody should have been able to use in their operations. It
all looked good on paper but when it was time to make real
changes, we had no real power to make things happen…There
was no sense of urgency or commitment and leadership in the
field was nonexistent. My General Manager had made
improvement commitments with our CEO that could not be kept.
He oversold what we were able to actually deliver. People all
had their own ideas about what we were ultimately trying to
accomplish but the leadership above us let us hang out to twist
in the wind. After 18 months the CEO looked at the costs and
the limited return and said enough and that was it.
A couple of people were reassigned but I along with one other
guy was turned out on the street. I was the highest ranked
person to lose his job. I remember us talking about the
importance of never losing sight of what results the
organization needs from you, making sure that you and your
boss are on the same page and doing the things that lead to
results with diligence. Well, I really dropped the ball on this
one and I am very angry at myself, my boss and the CEO as
well.
If I had done a better job of forcing the issue of what we were
trying to accomplish, developing a more realistic game plan for
our field leaders and measuring actual changes more effectively,
things might have turned out differently. My biggest mistake is
that I failed to practice what I knew to be true. I was in charge
82. Done1234512.E3 People – Educate, Empower,
Encourage1234513.Effective Selection and Reward
Systems1234514.Very Cost Conscious1234515.Capable of
Rapidly Adapting to Change12345
86. True False
4. What is a result-oriented manager’s most important resource?
_______________________
5. Most results-oriented managers work on average more than
50 hours per week.
True False
6. What is the primary reason most managers cited for not
effectively planning?
_____________________________________________________
__
7. Results-oriented managers make it a top priority to stay
focused on long-term issues at all times. True
False
8. What percentage of managers in the U.S. have a mentor that
they meet with regularly to help provide them with career
development counsel and accountability? ___%
9. What is the most frequently cited reason that managers fail to
get desired results?
_____________________________________________________
______
10. According to results oriented managers the real key to
motivating employees is:Feedback on performanceFinancial
incentivesOwnership of outcomesGoal settingPersonal
development
88. Absolute #1:
Get Everyone on the Same Page: Focus on the Purpose of Your
Organization
Practice 1: Create a Clear Sense of Purpose for Your
Organization
Irrefutable Performance Principle: Work units with a clear
sense of purpose outperform those that do not have a clearly
defined mission.
Practice 2: Clarify Your Role as Leader in the Operation
Irrefutable Performance Principle: Managers improve
their performance and the performance of their people when
they perform value-added practices and minimize non-value-
added activity.
Practice 3: Develop Meaningful Performance Goals and
Measures
Irrefutable Performance Principle: Work units that have
clearly defined performance goals and effective performance
measures will outperform those that do not, all things being
equal.
Practice 4: Frame Each Person’s Role in Your Operation.
Irrefutable Performance Principle: Without effective
leadership employees find it difficult at best to keep their
activity aligned with the current needs of an operation.
Absolute #2:
Prepare for Battle: Equip Your Operation with Tools, Talent,
and Technology
Practice 1: Develop and Use Systematic and Ongoing Planning
Practices
Irrefutable Performance Principle: Effective planning is
90. *
Practice 2: Motivate Employees to Create Ownership and
Accountability
Irrefutable Performance Principle: When a manager
motivates a workforce to create a sense of ownership and
accountability for desired results, the job of getting results gets
easier.
Practice 3: Provide Ongoing Performance Feedback by Being a
Good Coach
Irrefutable Performance Principle: People cannot change
their performance if they don’t know there is a need to do so or
if they don’t know how to change.
Practice 4: Remove Performance Barriers
Irrefutable Performance Principle: When managers
consistently remove barriers to performance they make it easier
for people to get their work done and achieve desired results.
Absolute #4:
Build Bridges on the Road to Results: Nurture Relationships
with People
Practice 1: Forge Effective 360-degree Working Relationships
Irrefutable Performance Principle: Results-oriented
managers foster effective 360-degree working relationships with
all people who are important to getting results, and they
continually work to keep these relationships viable.
Practice 2: Demonstrate Leadership Worthy of Trust
Irrefutable Performance Principle: There is no substitute
for competency and character in developing trustworthy
leadership that fosters long-term success.
Practice 3: Establish Open, Ongoing, and Focused Two-Way
Communication
91. Irrefutable Performance Principle: A manager’s ability to
meet people’s communication needs is critically important to
success and requires both skill and a systematic process.
Practice 4: Nurture Cooperation and Teamwork
Irrefutable Performance Principle: Effective leadership
creates cooperation and teamwork that accelerates the speed at
which results can be achieved.
Absolute #5:
Keep the Piano in Tune: Practice Continuous Renewal
Practice 1: Develop Improved Processes
Irrefutable Performance Principle: Effective leaders
develop vehicles to proactively improve processes and the
factors that influence performance.
Practice 2: Perfect the Art of Performance Appraisal
Irrefutable Performance Principle: Effective managers
practice constructive employee appraisal and development to
help their people continuously improve their personal
performance.
Practice 3: Develop a Plan to Improve Your Performance
Irrefutable Performance Principle: Effective managers
take responsibility for their own development, determining a
clear plan of action to improve their current performance and
prepare for their future to meet the changing demands of the job
as leader.
Practice 4: Create and Maintain Balance in Your Professional
and Personal Life
Irrefutable Performance Principle: Managers truly
interested in long-term success in every area of their lives,
create and maintain the balance that helps sustain real long-term
success.
95. The Power of Creating a Climate for Success
Practice ongoing performance monitoring and measurement at
both the team and individual level.
Motivate your people by creating ownership of outcomes and
accountability for results.
Provide ongoing performance feedback and coaching to your
people based on their talent and motivation levels.
Rapidly removing barriers and solve problems that damage
performance.
Critical Questions to Answer:Why don’t managers practice this
absolute?
What are the CONSEQUENCES of not practicing this absolute?
What are the BENEFITS of practicing this absolute?
Assignment: After answering these questions, draw a picture
that best illustrates this absolute that will be shared with the
group.
102. employees? __________
PREPARE
5. Employ appropriate and systematic planning practices on an
ongoing basis? __________
6. Demonstrate extreme care in properly staffing my
operation? __________
7. Ensure that my people are properly trained and educated to
get results? __________
8. Work to ensure that people are properly equipped to
perform their jobs? __________
CLIMATE Regularly monitor and measure the
individual/operational performance? __________ Create
ownership and accountability around desired performance
outcomes? __________ Provide ongoing performance
feedback and coaching to my people? __________
Work to rapidly remove performance barriers that damage
performance? __________
RELATIONSHIPS
13. Practice effective communications to understand others
and to be understood? __________
14. Lead-by-example and demonstrate competency and
character in the workplace? __________
15. Work at continually developing and nurturing key working
relationships? __________
16. Foster cooperation and teamwork with people who need
each other to get results? __________
RENEWAL
17. Develop myself with the skills and talents necessary to be
a high performer? __________
18. Have mechanisms in place to improve processes on an
ongoing basis? __________
19. Constructively appraise and nurture employee development