3. Is there a principled difference between
the Corn Story and the Genesis account
of creation of man that permits the first
to be included in textbooks but not the
second?
4. The People of the Corn
Is there a principled difference between the Corn Story and the
Genesis account of creation of man that permits the first to be
included in textbooks but not the second?
Does it make any difference that the creationist wanted their story
told in a science book, while the People of the Corn want theirs
told in a history book? Is there a difference between “scientific
truth” and “historical truth”.
If you would approve of including the Corn Story because the
culture of groups should be treated with a care-based attitude,
shouldn’t you show similar care/respect to Southern Baptists?
Is this about truth or is this about tolerance and understanding?
Who owns the truth? What question are we being asked to
answer?
5. Does it make any difference that the
creationist wanted their story told in a
science book, while the People of the
Corn want theirs told in a history book?
Is there a difference between “scientific
truth” and “historical truth”.
6. If we include the Corn Story in the
textbook (because the culture of groups
should be treated with a care-based
attitude), how do we reconcile our
treatment of the Southern Baptists and
their Genesis story?
7. Is this about truth or is this about
tolerance and understanding
(acceptance?) What question are we
being asked to answer?
8. Alienation and self-identity
• Are our students culturally alienated?
• Do our students feel like this is their school and
do they have a sense of belonging?
An issue of truth…and who controls it
• Secular, white, European-oriented, male elites
• Who owns the truth?
9. Dialogue
• Free and open debate about issues-there may be
many truths (J. S. Mill)
One and the many (E Pluribus Unum or E
Pluribus Pluribus)
• One shared culture versus a respect for all cultures
equally
10. • Understand and evaluate their beliefs in terms of
their historical or cultural context
• Skeptical about binary oppositions (there is no
right or wrong)
• Life has no truth-no action is preferable to another
• Is it more about sameness or differences?
11. We may differ in our views, in our religions,
in our ethnicity, in our gender, in our history
BUT we are still PERSONS
Our PERSONHOOD is the basis for our
dignity and rights
12. Are our differences more basic than our
sameness?
What is a person? Who’s definition is paramount?
Can we truly describe what a person is to
everyone all the time?
We may be imposing some cultural bias onto
others…
• Freedom and equality favors European culture, or men,
or heterosexuals (it is these same folks that owned
slaves, that didn’t allow women to vote, that
discriminated against gays and lesbians)
• Nazism
• Economics: Pleasure maximizers suits the capitalists
13. It may not be about personhood because of the
cultural biases
It is not about WHAT we are but our
PERCEPTIONS of WHAT DEFINES who we are
If it is not about PERSONHOOD, is it about
TRUTH?
14. The Wisdom of Obi Wan Kenobi
Theme for English B by Langston Hughes
Women vs. men
European Americans vs. African
Americans vs. Hispanic Americans
Jews vs. Christianity vs. Muslims
There are no whole truths…truths are only
partial and at the mercy of one’s own
perspective
Who owns the truth?
15. Women vs. men
European Americans vs. African
Americans vs. Hispanic Americans
Jews vs. Christianity vs. Muslims
There are no whole truths…truths are only
partial and at the mercy of one’s own
perspective
Who owns the truth?
18. What is our responsibility with regard to
students attending our schools who cannot
speak English?
19. “Culture is to humans as water is to fish.” —Wade Nobles
“Culture is organized within an identifiable community or
group. This includes the ways that community use
language, interact with one another, take turns to talk,
relate to time and space, and approach learning.” —
Villegas & Lucas, Educating Culturally Responsive
Teachers: A Coherent Approach (2002)
“Culture is a ‘learned behavior,’ passed down through
family, community, and heritage. Heritage comes in two
parts: complexities and intangibles.” —Hollie, Culturally
and Linguistically Responsive Teaching and Learning:
Classroom Practices for Student Success (2011)
20. We stated earlier that religion and politics
were private matters for this very reason.
These are not just facts about people…
not possessions that can be changed at
will
To fail to respect diversity is to reject who
people are and thus deny them their worth
Is there anything worse?
25. It is error alone, that stands in
need of government to support
it; truth can and will do better
without…it.
-Reverend John Leland
(Baptist minister in favor of separation of church and state)
Obama, B. (2006). The audacity of hope: Thoughts on reclaiming the american
dream. Crown publishing group. pp. 217-218.
26.
27. Schools were to “Americanize” immigrants
“Congress may make no law effecting an
establishment of religion nor prohibiting free
speech” (Establishment and Free Exercise
Clauses in the Bill of Rights)
• And yet schools had bible recitations and Lord’s Prayer
required in many states until the late 1960s.
• Catholics started their own school system
• American Indians driven west and confined to
reservations
• Executive Order 9066 February 19, 1942 (Japanese
Internment)
Most minorities and immigrant populations have
found America repressive and exploitive
28. Creation and evolution
• These may be parts of our religious beliefs
• Teaching one over the other may be a
contradiction to a religious belief and so a
rejection of who the students are
• What is the third thing? Is this about biology or
identity?
Contributions to national history
• Important affirmations to personal worth related to
culture
29. What if evolution is true?
What if our contributions to national history
are not positive or great?
Should we affirm our worth according to
the accomplishments or failings of long
dead members of our culture?
30. Some creationists do not believe the literal
interpretation of the Bible and believe in
evolution BUT there is purpose and design
vs. chance and natural selection
BUT
Who says we must start with the
Creationism point of view?
31. Every culture owns its own truth
All cultures are valuable.
One culture cannot criticize another culture
because there is no general Truth
Difference Rules!
32. Personhood is primary
Person’s choice and moral view is
paramount
• Some moral views are not OK, i.e. racism should
not be tolerated!
33. “When you plant lettuce, if it does not grow
well, you don’t blame the lettuce.
You look for reasons it is not doing well. It
may need fertilizer, or more water, or less
sun. You never blame the lettuce.
Yet if we have problems with our friends or
our family, we blame the other person, But if
we know how to take care of them, they will
grow well – like the lettuce.
Blaming has no positive effect at all, nor does
trying to persuade using reason and
arguments.
That is my experience.
No blame, no reasoning, nor argument, just
understanding.
If you understand, and you show that you
understand, you can love, and the situation
will change.”
--Thich Nhat Hahn, Peace Is Every Step
34. Everyone must be tolerant, AND we may
not seek to regulate views of a good life
OK if teach a just constitution to create
virtues of a democratic society
Not OK if we want a shared religion or a
common culture (beyond the political
culture of our constitution)
35. We must teach tolerance even if we disapprove
We must teach that we must be tolerant of
disapproval
We respect the right to choose not necessarily the
choice
Need not falsify or invent history to be
favorable…we are not rejecting the worth of them
as people
• Their worth is based upon the fact that they are a person
(moral agent) not on the achievements of their culture or
upon the truth of their religion
36. Is it OK for a culture of people to invent a
history to their own liking?
37. Diversity contributes to the greatest
good for the greatest number
Diversity makes life more interesting
The pursuit of truth is important
• How do you get to the truth?
Intellectual liberty, experimentation, debate,
experiential evidence
We can never be sure we have the truth
If you are sure of the truth why
argue?
If there is no truth why argue?
38. …your religion is false, your culture is
worthless, and the achievements of your
people are insignificant.
39. There are two points that must be
balanced, both points have
been made by many different
philosophers:
1. talk about what is “right” and
“wrong” only makes sense
against the background of an
inherited tradition; but
2. traditions themselves can be
criticized. Hilary Putnam
Harvard University,
Philosopher
40. The concepts we acquire from our culture,
educational influence and structure
What is reasonable to believe according to
our interests and biases…we have a right
to our individual truths
41. Radical Pluralism (differences are fundamental)
Principle for the affirmation and acceptance of diversity
Everyone agrees on minimal common values, i.e. tolerance
and equal respect
What about oppressive cultures and their “right”
to act how they want to act (Nazi Germany)?
Cultural Relativism (it all makes sense if you understand
the culture)
is the principle that an individual human's beliefs and
activities make sense in terms of his or her own culture.
Is slavery, our treatment of American Indians, sexually
degrading views, religious intolerance, etc. OK?
43. Margarat Mead
“…every culture must be seen as a whole,
with its value system as an inextricable
component…cultural relativity demands
that every item of cultural behavior be
seen as relative to the culture of which it is
a part, and in that systematic setting every
item has positive or negative meaning and
value.”
44. This does NOT mean that “everything is
equal” that “anything goes” and that all
cultural practices are relative and
acceptable.
It DOES mean that BEFORE passing
judgment, we should approach cultural
groups on their own terms.
Goh, M. & Demerath, P. 2015. Culture in the relationship gap. Urban
Leadership Academy. University of Minnesota.
46. Capacity for a sense of social justice
Capacity for forming a conception of their
own good
These are rooted in culture AND can be
changed given good reasons and
reflection
47. People are different
We should understand our own biases and
eliminate negative biases toward others
Impartial between conflicting interests,
views and values of different religions,
races, ethnic groups and genders
Can’t have preferences
• Like officials at a sporting event
49. Free Choice
“We claim and
enjoy complete
freedom”
Laws
Obedience to
the Enforceable
Self-imposed Law
Obedience to the Unenforceable
Tight/Tight
Loose/Loose
Tight/Loose
50. Educational opportunities that allow for pursuit and
development of what is distinctive about them
• Religion, culture, what is good
Educational opportunities for the public ethic
• Sense of tolerance (or acceptance) of difference and
respect for equal rights for others
The creation of shared civic life that allows for a
sense of social justice
• Different from an attempt to view the culture of one group
as a normative for others
Opportunities to learn from one another and learn
about one another
51. “This is the value of the teacher,
who looks at a face and says
there's something behind that and
I want to reach that person, I
want to influence that person, I
want to encourage that person, I
want to enrich, I want to call out
that person who is behind that
face, behind that color, behind
that language, behind that
tradition, behind that culture. I
believe you can do it. I know what
was done for me.”
52. “Do unto others as you would
want them do unto you.”
OR
“Do unto others as they would
have you do unto them.
53. We need to provide a window for
everyone to view other cultures AND
we need to have a mirror for all
cultures to reflect upon themselves
54.
55. I understand how EVERYone’s perspective
is important in our treatment of each other.
I have an understanding how I/we can
reconcile this with my own/our school’s
perspective.
56. Graduation regalia…lei, Eagle feather, African
stole
School events on holidays…MLK, Rosh
Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Kwanzaa,
Wednesday evenings, Good Friday, 2 Islam
holidays during Ramadan
Gender names/nicknames, gender identity
Catcher in the Rye, Huckleberry Finn,
Wellness class, Geological Timeline in
science
Poverty, ACEs (America’s Children)
57.
58.
59. Anthony Muhammad, Carol Dweck and
Moneyball (2002 Oakland As)
&
You may not know when you have made
something “profound” happen.
60. “We must move on from the
reassuring repetition of stale phrases to
a new, difficult, but essential confrontation
with reality. For the great enemy of truth
is very often not the lie – deliberate,
contrived and dishonest -- but the myth –
persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Too
often we hold fast to the clichés of our
forebears. We subject all facts to a
prefabricated set of interpretations. We
enjoy the comfort of opinion without
the discomfort of thought.
Mythology distracts us everywhere.”
61. Descriptors of Students
Most Successful Least Successful
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
What do you do as a leader or teacher to enable
success for students or other individuals in your
school?
62. I can summarize a framework of making
difficult decisions.
I can apply resolution principles that
validate all members of our learning
community.
I understand the influence of democracy,
community, and educational
professionalism in the role of learning for
students.
63. Educational opportunities that allow for pursuit and
development of what is distinctive about them
• Religion, culture, what is good
Educational opportunities for the public ethic
• Sense of tolerance (or acceptance) of difference and
respect for equal rights for others
The creation of shared civic life that allows for a
sense of social justice
• Different from an attempt to view the culture of one group
as a normative for others
Opportunities to learn from one another and learn
about one another
67. Free Choice
“We claim and
enjoy complete
freedom”
Laws
Obedience to
the Enforceable
Self-imposed Law
Obedience to the Unenforceable
Tight/Tight
Loose/Loose
Tight/Loose
68. BLACK LIE GRAY LIE
RED LIE WHITE LIE
Howitaffectsme
How it affects others
I get positive benefit
I lose out in some way
Others get positive
benefit
Others lose out in some
way
69. Coherence: CIA, finance, tests, teacher
training, textbooks aligned
Curricular Equity: All students have equal
opportunities
Incentives: tangible benchmarks
(graduation tests)
70. Who is accountable?
• Policy makers, students, parents, professional
standards.
For what are we accountable?
To whom are we accountable?
71. What is a democracy? What form of
democratic authority should characterize
schools?
What is a community? Who are its
members? Which community should
dominate in decisions about schooling?
What does it mean for teachers and school
leaders to be professionals? What
authority over education should be ceded
to professionals?
72. Standards as a benchmark
Standards as a measure of excellence
Think about working with a teacher and the
“standards” of good teaching.
73. Goal Displacement: What is the easiest
measurable benchmark, or we will narrow our
expectations (“I am just doing what I am told.”)
Motivational Displacement: no longer internally
motivated to do a good job and will rely solely on
incentives (“My worth is measured on the
measured outcome of my students.”)
Gaming: find ways to improve test scores that are
not related to educating students.
74. To focus only on morality means
emphasizing the following:
• What is right and what is wrong
• Personal conduct
• Disconnects the ART of good leadership
• Just be truthful, don’t steal, don’t be a racist or a
sexist avoid conflicts of interests and make fair
decisions
• This is why our WHY is so important!
75.
76. 1) Regret (acknowledgment): A verbal acknowledgment by the perpetrator that the
wrongful behavior caused unnecessary pain, suffering and hurt that
identifies, specifically, what action or behavior is responsible for the pain.
2) Accepting responsibility (declaration): An unconditional declarative statement
by the perpetrator recognizing the wrongful behavior and acknowledging
that there is no excuse for it.
3) Restitution (penance): An offer of help or assistance to victims, by the
perpetrator; action beyond the words “I’m sorry,” and conduct that assumes
the responsibility to make the situation right.
4) Repentance (humility): Language by the perpetrator acknowledging that this
behavior caused pain and suffering for which he/she is genuinely sorry;
language by the perpetrator recognizing that serious, unnecessary harm
and emotional damage was caused.
5) A direct request for forgiveness: “I was wrong, I hurt you and I ask you to forgive
me.”
Chapman, G., & Thomas, J. (2006) The five languages of an apology: how to experience healing iall
your relationships (New Edition). Northfield Publishing.
77.
78. Locate the morality in the end result of the
act (the consequence of the action)
Locate the morality in certain rights and
duties
79.
80. Ethical Decision Making
Culture/Values/Leadership
Intellectual Liberty
Individual Freedom and the Public Interest
Equal Educational Opportunity
Educational Evaluation
Diversity: Multiculturalism and Religion
Ethical Fitness: An Approach to Current Issues
Educational Authority and Accountability
81. Seek first to understand and be sensitive to
other points of view (perceptions)!
Whoever tells the stories defines the culture.
Do you want to be right or successful? Can
we be both?
Balance efficiency and effectiveness
Reflect and build your wisdom from your
experiences.
Let the process be the product.
R3=Relevant, rational and reflective
It would be short sighted of us to use one
principle as the guiding light of our careers.
83. You may be frustrated by the case studies in the
class because it is difficult to make definitive
decision…Will this result in you being a better
administrator?
We take what we already know and put it in an
unusual, challenging situation.
The risk is that you may be worse off by these
exercises because it could debilitate you
So…is it possible to solve these complicated and
difficult issues?
84. Will these exercises make us better
administrators?
May make us worse before we get better (just like
your golf swing)
A vehicle for reflective dialogue.
When the moment for action arrives, the thinking has already
been done, the impulses internalized, and the intuitions
prepared to lead to resolutions” (Kidder, 69).
Develop muscle memory
85. We justified some decisions by discussing culture
• Is it OK to suggest that ethics is relative to culture?
• If we disagree, can we blame it on culture?
This is cultural relativism.
This does NOT mean that “everything is equal” that
“anything goes” and that all cultural practices are
relative and acceptable.
It DOES meant that BEFORE passing judgment, we
should approach cultural groups on their own means.
86. When a person attempts to give reasons to
another person, is this an attempt at coercion
(ends based approach)?
Persuasion is a form of influence that
recognizes individuals as free moral agents
with rational minds and human feelings (care).
We do not learn to make responsible choices
by being told our decisions do not matter
87. • view freedom, equality, and democracy as arbitrary
• view leadership as a technical exercise…values are not
important…efficiency rules…focus on completing tasks at
hand and renounce responsibility for judging the
educational and moral worth of the objectives of policies
they are given by others.
• believe "Ours is not to reason why. Ours is but to do and
die” (Alfred Lord Tennyson)
• we don’t make the rules we just follow them.
89. What is the real question being asked?
What is really important?
90. Can’t decide what
justice requires
without wrestling with
these 2 questions.
What is the real
question being
asked?
What is really
important?
94. Reach a point in our deliberations where our
moral intuitions and the moral theory that
accounts for them are consistent and can be
objectively justified. (p. 111)
Gut instinct + solid rationale = a good decision
Yes, we can change our position with new
information.
95.
96. Allows us to feel and empathize with other
persons.
Also allows us to think.
We need emotion as well as reason.
• We need to identify with others
• Feelings provide motivation for right conduct
Knowing what is right and wanting to do it are different
things.
97. We start with our moral principles that
differentiate our sense of right and wrong.
98. Different sources do not mean we can’t
agree…
People have a common biology, common
fundamental needs and feelings, a
common physical environment, common
aspirations on a common planet with a
common science and common global
problems.
It’s not easy AND it’s not impossible.
101. I can summarize a framework of making
difficult decisions.
I can apply resolution principles that
validate all members of our learning
community.
I understand the influence of democracy,
community, and educational
professionalism in the role of learning for
students.
Editor's Notes
Indian boarding school-a strangely cruel but litgtle-know era in American history when Indian children were taken from their famiiles and placed in residential institutions far from their home so that they could be stripped of their Native identities and reeducated into Europ-American values and ways.
Students with limited interrupted formal education
Minneapolis Southwest HS-May 1998
Began working in the media center in 1969…as David Davis…
Married with 2 teenage children…
(p. 140)
(see page 142)
ACLU Sues Over Student Nose-Piercing Suspension Despite Church of Body Modification Beliefs
Posted Oct 6, 2010 6:49 PM CDTBy Martha Neil
Email
Print
Reprints
The American Civil Liberties Union has sued a school board in North Carolina over its suspension of a teenage student for having a peridot stud in a nose-piercing.
Because Ariana Iacono belongs, along with her mother, to the Church of Body Modification, the suit contends the suspension violates her constitutional right to freedom of religion, reports the Associated Press. Her mother and the family's minister has tried to explain the church doctrine that piercings are a pathway to experience their religion.
This is a case about a family's right to send a 14-year-old honor student to public school without her being forced to renounce her family's religious beliefs," writes the local chapter of the ACLU and the firm Ellis & Winters of Raleigh in a brief supporting the suit against the Johnston County school board. It was filed in federal court in Raleigh.
A photo of Iacono published by the Raleigh News & Observer shows a small, round apparent piece of metal about the size of a tiny earring in her nose.
"All we're doing is following board policy. Board policies are in place for a reason," schools Superintendent Ed Croom told the newspaper, which noted Iacono had been offered the opportunity to return to school if her nose stud was covered with a bandage.
A dress code for Clayton High School bans nose piercings but exempts offending articles worn due to "sincerely held religious belief," the AP article notes. School officials, the dress code states, "shall not attempt to determine whether the religious beliefs are valid, but only whether they are central to religious doctrine and sincerely held.“
Masthead
Published Wed, Oct 06, 2010 10:43 AMModified Wed, Oct 06, 2010 10:57 AM
Student suspended over piercing files suit against school board, officials
A Clayton High School freshman who was suspended multiple times from Clayton High school for refusing to remove or conceal her nose piercing is suing the Johnston County school board and several school officials.
The American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court on behalf of 14-year-old Ariana Iacono and her mother, Nikki Iacono, this morning.
Johnston County school officials on Tuesday denied Arian's appeal to return to school. The teen has said she should be exempt from the school system's dress code policy that prohibits facial jewelry because she belongs to the little-known Church of Body Modification, which encourages piercings and tattoos as a path to spiritual enlightenment.
Ariana's fourth suspension, which lasted 10 days, ended Tuesday. But instead of allowing the teen to return to Clayton High School, officials are referring her to an alternative school, said Katy Parker, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina.
Two weeks ago, Parker said, school leaders said Ariana could return to school if she agreed to cover the peridot nose stud with a bandage. But Ariana refused, and Parker said it was unreasonable to expect a teen to wear a bandage on her face for the next four years until graduation.
"All we're doing is following board policy," said schools Superintendent Ed Croom said. "Board policies are in place for a reason."
Although the dress code bans facial jewelry, school policy says educators can accommodate students who have a "sincerely held religious belief."
Parker said Ariana does not want to attend an alternative school. Nikki Iacono has said she is also a member of the Church of Body Modification, did not return a phone call on Tuesday.
"It's very disappointing that school officials are making Ariana's mother choose between Ariana's religion and Ariana's education," Parker said.
June 11, 1962 Yale University Commencement Speech
Important for us to continue to look at and build upon an agreed upon curriculum of essential learnings that was created through collaboration…even a district wide idea of what defines our essential learnings
It is important for us to look at our students and how we grade them and there will be more happening with this with our grading action team.
It is important for us to embrace Carol Dweck’s research with regard to the growth mindset…all students can learn and understand our essential learnings… they just may need a bit more time than others…Hattie’s meta analysis research of over 800 studies…it may be the closest thing to the educational holy grail that we have.
member
massp2016
White lie
In this model, white lies are altruistic as we seek first to help others, even at some cost to ourselves.
In practice, there are shades of white and what we tell ourselves are white lies are often tending more towards gray than pure white.
Even when we lose out significantly, there is arguably always some benefit, for example in the way we feel good about our actions and how others praise or thank us for our selflessness.
The White Lie is part of our social fabric and stops us from emotionally hurting or insulting each other with the cold, hard, painful truth. Everyone lies a little as a way of getting through life without violence and aggression, and so as to not hurt people. If you see someone wearing a new outfit that doesn’t suit them, you’ll tell them they look great, so as not to hurt them.
My step mother in law and her sausage that she makes all the time…I have to eat it now every time I see her.
Gray lie
Most of the lies we tell are gray lies. They are partly to help others and partly to help ourselves. They may vary in the shade of gray, depending on the balance of help and harm.
Gray lies are, almost by definition, hard to clarify. For example you can lie to help a friend out of trouble but then gain the reciprocal benefit of them lying for you while those they have harmed in some way lose out.
The Beneficial Lie is used by a person who intends to help others. For example, a farmer hiding Jews from Nazis who is asked if he’s keeping any Jews in his house, is seen as acting heroically when he lies. The rescue worker who pulls a child from the remains of a burning car and lies to the child that his mother and father are OK is saving the child, in the short term, from more trauma. Doctors who lie to a patient on their deathbed to lift their spirits or prescribe fake meditation, placebos, to patients are also technically lying.
Black lie
Black lies are about simple and callous selfishness. We tell black lies when others gain nothing and the sole purpose is either to get ourselves out of trouble (reducing harm against ourselves) or to gain something we desire (increasing benefits for ourselves).
The worst black lies are very harmful for others. Perhaps the very worst gain us a little yet harm others a great deal.
It’s the Deceptive Lie that is the dangerous one because the liar intends to harm or disadvantage the victim for their own benefit.
There are two main ways of deceitful lying – concealment and falsification.
In concealment, the liar doesn’t actually tell a lie, but withholds information. So Jane might tell her friend Mary that she saw Mary’s ex-boyfriend at a party last night. But she doesn’t reveal that she went home with him.
In falsifying, false information is presented as if it was true, intentionally. So Jane might tell Mary she didn’t enjoy the party and ended up going home early, alone.
Red lie
Red lies are about spite and revenge. They are driven by the motive to harm others even at the expense of harming oneself. They may even be carved in blood.
When we are angry at others, perhaps because of a long feud or where we feel they have wronged us in some way, we feel a sense of betrayal and so seek retributive justice, which we may dispense without thought of consequence.
Malicious Lies, or rumor-mongering, are often used as weapons in a competitive situation. Malicious liars set out to destroy the character and reputations of their victims, usually with devastating and lasting results. A company might, for example, spread false information that its main competitor is in financial difficulties. Similarly, it is not uncommon for political parties to start rumors of inappropriate sexual behavior by an opponent. Or imagine if one of two men vying for the attention of the same woman told the woman that the other man had a sexually transmitted disease.
Lies are misrepresentations used as a means of creating false impressions, managing impressions, or covering up actions - in order to influence the thoughts and actions of others. Individuals who lie know what the truth is, and want to conceal it.
A lie has 3 main features:
A lie communicates or hides information
The liar knows the truth.
The liar intends to deceive in order to influence the audience to believe something that is not true - so that subsequent impressions, decisions and actions on the part of the victim(s) or others will be in the liar's favour.
Who is accountable?
Legislature….consumers….parents….professional standards
Policy makers, students, parents, professional standards.
For what are we accountable?
To whom are we accountable?
Democracy…a way of making decisions (requires a sense of equal respect or care-based philosophy)
The interests of each member of the polity are fairly considered.
Each member of the polity has a fair opportunity to influence the decision.
Representative democracy vs. participatory democracy…p. 100 (STRIKE)
Community….formed around commonalities…traditions, practrices, customs, or values that have authority for members of a community because the community is their community
Educational community…hockey community, basketball community, speech community, theatre community….
A community could result from coming together for a common goal…agree that education is important and agree what education they wish to provide & then work hard together to provide it. Should the parents be a part of this community?
We want parents to be more than clients…members of the community…but how where do we then draw the line for their authority?
Professionalism and learning communities…
What is a professional? Occupation that is characterized bya particular form of accountability.
Obligated to respect and be guided by the knowledge base
Guided by welfard of their clients
Collegiality allows us to learn from others as well in the best interest of clients
Is our knowledge base absoluete…without controversy
To what level do we have autonomy? (those who know rule)
Is a school a community?
COMMENTARY
The Norwood Teague resignation:
Still in search of the perfect apology
A genuine apology is about the victims, not the perpetrator. And
there’s really no good legal reason to avoid it.
By James E. Lukaszewski () AUGUST 10, 2015 — 5:56PM
On Friday, Norwood Teague resigned as the University of Minnesota’s athletic director
after two sexual-harassment charges were filed by two nonstudent university employees.
Teague’s statement included the phrases, “[I] had entirely too much to drink” and sent
“truly inappropriate texts.” And “I behaved badly toward nice people. … I’m
embarrassed and I apologize. …”
Genuine apologies are about the victims, not the perpetrators. An apology is the atomic
energy of empathy. Genuine apologies stop more bad things from happening.
The most powerful action in reputation recovery and rehabilitation is to apologize. If
you want or need forgiveness, you’ll need to apologize. “Wait a minute,” you say, “the
lawyers won’t ever let me apologize.” Well, let’s talk about apology — understand it —
and then we’ll get back to the attorneys.
Management avoids apologizing by using an amazing array of avoidance strategies.
There’s self-forgiveness: “It’s an industry problem; we’re not the only ones” or “Let’s not
blow this out of proportion.” There’s self-talk: “It’s only an isolated incident,” “It’s never
happened before,” “Not very many were involved” and “This is not who we are.”
In this case, add self-forgiveness to the technique: I was drunk; I sent several
inappropriate e-mails; I behaved badly toward nice people; I’m embarrassed and I
apologize. Teague could have said with equal non-effect: “It won’t ever happen again,” “I
am not a crook” and “I did not have sex with these people.”
What was wrong with Teague’s apology? There was no admission that what he did made
others suffer and be shamed. He simply never apologized at all. “I was embarrassed and
I apologize.” He forgave himself first, protected the people around him, and never
directly addressed the pain and suffering caused by his actions.
Forgiveness by the victims, which is the purpose of an apology, is a process.
The most constructive structure for apology I’ve seen is in “The Five Languages of
Apology,” a book by Gary Chapman and Jennifer Thomas. Here, with some
paraphrasing and modification based on my experiences, are the ingredients of the
perfect apology.
1) Regret (acknowledgment): A verbal acknowledgment by the perpetrator that the
wrongful behavior caused unnecessary pain, suffering and hurt that identifies,
specifically, what action or behavior is responsible for the pain.
2) Accepting responsibility (declaration): An unconditional declarative statement by the
perpetrator recognizing the wrongful behavior and acknowledging that there is no
excuse for it.
3) Restitution (penance): An offer of help or assistance to victims, by the perpetrator;
action beyond the words “I’m sorry,” and conduct that assumes the responsibility to
make the situation right.
4) Repentance (humility): Language by the perpetrator acknowledging that this behavior
caused pain and suffering for which he/she is genuinely sorry; language by the
perpetrator recognizing that serious, unnecessary harm and emotional damage was
caused.
5) A direct request for forgiveness: “I was wrong, I hurt you and I ask you to forgive me.”
(http://stmedia.startribune.com/images/ows_143924730881074.jpg)
J E R RY H O LT • J E R RY. H O LT@ STA RT R I B U N E .C O M
Former University of Minnesota athletic
director Norwood Teague.
The most difficult and challenging aspects of apologizing are to admit having done
something hurtful, damaging or wrong, and to request forgiveness. Skip even one step,
and you simply fail.
Do apologies matter? Twenty-nine states seem to think so. These states have enacted
legislation exempting voluntary expressions of regret and apology at traffic accidents
from being considered by juries when setting auto-liability damages. Legislation is
pending in Congress to mitigate the impact of liability on malpractice insurance claims
against doctors and medical personnel who apologize immediately, or very quickly, and
sincerely. Several states have enacted similar laws for health care workers.
The biggest problem with apology is the attitude among leaders and their attorneys that
apology is a sign of weakness. My advice is: Get over it. There’s mounting statistical
evidence in health care that apologies — even if they are required by insurance
companies (which they more frequently are) — are having a dramatic effect on reducing
litigation and related costs.
So now we’re back to the attorneys. When the lawyers say you can’t apologize because
it’s an admission of something (which it is), you can tell them (with nearly absolute
certainty) that an apology will, at a minimum, mitigate and, at a maximum, eliminate
litigation. An apology may be the trigger to settlement.
Failure to apologize is always a trigger for litigation.
Today’s legal reality is that only one in 200 civil cases filed ever get to trial. Instead,
these cases will be settled, dismissed or resolved by some other mechanism such as
arbitration.
Empathy is actions that speak louder than words. Apology is the atomic energy of
empathy. Failure to apologize is an integrity lapse that causes the corrosive destruction
of reputation and creates an impression of arrogance and callousness.
College athletics, as well as professional sports, are rife with examples of sexual
harassment and sexual assault. “Zero tolerance” seems good, but it also seems to equal
zero impact on the perpetrator, zero memory for the institution sponsoring the
perpetrator and zero the number of university leaders held to account. Zero-tolerance
policies need to be rethought, especially in an educational environment, to be replaced
by more potent teaching and culture-change activities.
The University of Minnesota actually justified Teague’s behavior by saying he had been
“overserved” (translation: shift the blame to the bartender). “It is disappointing and
disheartening to learn about the events that led to [Teague’s] resignation,” said Dean
Johnson, chairman of the university’s Board of Regents. The question is: unfortunate and
disheartening for whom? The university or the victims? Clearly, the university would
like Mr. Teague to leave the campus quietly and promptly.
Additional reporting is revealing the real truth about Mr. Teague’s serial behavior
toward women. The more the story is reported, the more his victims will come forward.
By the way, apologizing is purely a leadership choice rather than a legal decision. True
apologies are signs of integrity, honesty and compassion and provide closure for the
victims. The Teague non-apology and the university’s decision to support rather than to
clearly and powerfully condemn Teague’s behavior fails the integrity test, the
compassion test and the victim-sensitivity test.
James Lukaszewski is a Twin Cities-based international expert in crisis management and
leadership recovery, or departure following damaging incidents. The premise of his latest
book, “Lukaszewski on Crisis Communication: What Your CEO Needs to Know About
Reputation Risk and Crisis Management,” is successfully managing the victim dimension of
crisis.
What is one take away from the class?
"In The Forest Has Eyes, I want the viewer," says Bev Doolittle, "to share the emotions of the rider, and - as he does, because his life depends on it - 'read' the story in the leaves, branches, water and stone that surround him." At first glance, The Forest Has Eyes might appear to be a trick painting, but Doolittle's works must be looked at again and again, for they convey more than one message. Here we read the story of a mountain man, not easily frightened, he is wary and respectful of unknown territory. He is also alone and alone for too long, that is when his imagination takes over, creating images and persuading us that they are real. Our eyes play tricks. Does the forest have eyes?
(medicine example from p. 109)
This does NOT mean that “everything is equal” that “anything goes” and that all cultural practices are relative and acceptable.
It DOES meant that BEFORE passing judgment, we should approach cultural groups on their own means.
Kippel-Treaunay-Weber syndrome (KT) Was on PGA as full-time player in 1999. Lost his card. Played on the Nike tour which allowed carts. Circulatory disorder where blood vessels did not form properly in his leg. Painful.
Now head men’s golf coach at University of Oregon (Eugene which is his home town). Played for Stanford and won National Championship.
Argued January 2001. Decided May 2001. 7-2 to let him ride.
What is fair? What is an unfair advantage? Jack Nicklaus and Arnold Palmer testified that it was an unfair advantage. Who gets to decide? If it is about advantages…Just remove the question and let everyone ride if they want.
Can everyone ride the cart if they want to?
What is worthy of honor and recognition?
Golfers are sensitive to their status as golfers…ball is still, no jumping, no running
What is the essential nature of the activity?
Justice Stephens for the majority (avid golfer) to put ball in the hole in the fewest number of strokes
Justice Scalia for the minority no object except for amusement
Games allow us a respite from productive activity
Commercial enterprise
Rules are arbritary…change the base paths in baseball, height of basketball goals, size of the ball, type of clubs, how big the goalie equipment is in hockey
The last law is the one that for me is the most compelling, and, at the same time the one that probably “drives” most of us along (as well as driving us mad). It’s Mastery is an Asymptote. It’s a what? It’s an asymptote.
An asymptote is a straight line that a curve approaches but never quite reaches. I wasn’t big into algebra, which Dan Pink says we need here along with a little art history. But without either algebra or art history I get it. I’ll always be pursuing mastery and never possibly getting to an arriving point. As Pink says, “the mastery asymptote is a source of frustration. Why reach for something you can never fully attain? But it’s also a source of allure. Why not reach for it? The joy is in the pursuit more than the realization. In the end, mastery attracts precisely because mastery eludes.”
So mastering your instrument or becoming the best golf player, potter or painter is in fact a pain (aren’t you glad to get that validation!), it’s a mindset (so get your positive thinking caps on) and we’ll be in hot pursuit without a clear finish in sight.