The document provides notice of a public meeting of the City Council of San Angelo, Texas to take place on December 4, 2012 at the McNease Convention Center. The meeting agenda includes consideration of items such as approving previous meeting minutes and contracts, public hearings on zoning changes and budget amendments, and discussion of water conservation programs and economic development. The meeting location is accessible to persons with disabilities.

1. NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING
AN AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, December 4, 2012
McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room
500 Rio Concho Drive
THE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.
ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTH
MAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE
IS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK,
ROOM 202, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. every
day for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting.
As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate”
Thank You!
I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.)
A. Call to Order
B. Prayer and Pledge
"Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible.”
C. Public Comment
The Council takes public comment on all items in the Regular Agenda. Public input on a Regular Agenda
item will be taken at its appropriate discussion. Public input on an item not on the Agenda or Consent
Agenda may be identified and requested for consideration by the Council at this time. The Council may
request an item to be placed on a future agenda, or for a Consent Agenda item, to be moved to the Regular
Agenda for public comment.
II. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Consideration of approving the November 20, 2012 City Council Regular meeting minutes
2. Consideration of approving a maintenance service contract for San Angelo Public Safety
Communications in the amount of $141,395.88 for calendar year 2013 between the City of San Angelo
and Intergraph Corporation authorizing 24/7 technical support and authorizing the City Manager to
execute said maintenance contract and any renewal contract thereafter provided the cost does not
increase more than 4% each subsequent year (Submitted by Police Chief Tim Vasquez)
3. Consideration of approving an amendment to extend the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP)
contract between the City and the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA)
and authorizing the City Manager to execute related documents (Submitted by Neighborhood and
Family Services Director Bob Salas)
4. Consideration of adopting a revised Resolution authorizing the filing of applications with the Texas
Department of Transportation for federal transportation assistance in the amount of $1,300,354.00
million with a 20% matching fund requirement of up to $260,071.00 over a five year period under the
Transportation Enhancement Grant program, authorized by Title 43, Part 1, Chapter 11, Subchapter E
of the Texas Administrative Code, and other state and federal statutes administered by the Texas
Department of Transportation
City Council Agenda Page 1 of 4 December 4, 2012

2. 5. Consideration of approving a residential lease renewal located at Lot 37, Group Fishermans Road,
2610 Sleepy Hollow Road (Honaker); and authorizing the City Manager or Interim Water Utilities
Director to execute the same (Submitted by Interim Water Utilities Ricky Dickson)
6. Second hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending speed zones on us Highway 87
frontage roads
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, ARTICLE 10.200 OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING ESTABLISHMENT OF A
SPEED LIMIT OF 45 M.P.H. ON BOTH EAST AND WEST FRONTAGE ROADS OF US
HIGHWAY 87 BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF US HIGHWAY 87 AND FARM TO
MARKET ROAD 2105 EXTENDING SOUTH 2.553 MILES, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY,
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
III. REGULAR AGENDA:
D. EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION
Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A.
Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings
be Open, Section 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property
Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A.
Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings
be Open, Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to a company or companies
with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations and which the City of
San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo
E. PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT
7. Discussion, consideration of, and possible action on a petition filed by area landowners seeking
annexation (to San Angelo’s City limits) of certain properties situated immediately west/southwest of
San Angelo and encompassing a vacant 20.00 acre tract located at the southern corner of the
intersection of U.S. Highway 67 (Sherwood Way) and a southward projection of Appaloosa Trail
(Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)
8. First Public Hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A”
(Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo
Z 12-13: Creed Partners, LLC.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS
ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1601 KNICKERBOCKER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 230
FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF KNICKERBOCKER ROAD AND SOUTH JACKSON
STREET, IN SOUTHWESTERN SAN ANGELO. THIS PROPERTY OCCUPIES 4.086 ACRES OF
THE MCNEESE SURVEY 0176.25 ABSTRACT 1641, CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM LIGHT MANUFACTURING (ML) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL
(CG) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
9. First Public Hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A”
(Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo
Z 12-14: Basil El-Masri
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS
City Council Agenda Page 2 of 4 December 4, 2012

3. ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 4028 SOUTH BRYANT BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY
350 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH BRYANT BOULEVARD AND BEN
FICKLIN ROAD. THIS PROPERTY OCCUPIES 4.35 ACRES OF THE E HERMES SURVEY 0174
ABSTRACT 0349, IN SOUTHERN SAN ANGELO, CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM A COMBINATION OF RANCH & ESTATE (R&E) AND GENERAL
COMMERCIAL (CG), TO SINGLE ZONING OF GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG); PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
10. First Public Hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A”
(Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo
Z 12-15: Julie Snider
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS
ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 4126 LAKE DRIVE, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 100
FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF LAKE DRIVE AND NORTH BRYANT BOULEVARD;
MORE SPECIFICALLY OCCUPYING THE SHORT GEORGE ADDITION, BLOCKS 9 AND 10,
180’ X 484’ TRACT LESS THE SOUTHWEST 0.1020 ACRE, CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM RANCH & ESTATE (R&E) TO A GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG)
DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
(Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)
11. Consideration and possible action regarding a recommendation by the City of San Angelo
Development Corporation (COSADC) to approve and execute the lease document between COSADC
and Angelo State University Small Business Development Center in the Business Resource Center at
69 North
(Presentation by Community and Economic Development Director Shawn Lewis)
12. Discussion and consideration of City’s Water Conservation Credit Program
(Presentation by Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane)
13. Public Hearing and consideration of approving the 2011 Consolidated Annual Performance and
Evaluation Report (CAPER)
(Presentation by Neighborhood and Family Services Director Bob Salas)
14. Consideration of adopting a Resolution ratifying the application for a Public Health Emergency
Preparedness Discretionary Funds Grant in the amount of $134,419.00 from the Texas Department of
State Health Services to establish a public health emergency response center at the San Angelo City
Hall Complex which requires the City to contribute a ten percent (10%) match in funds in an amount of
$13,442.00; and authorizing the City to accept such grant funds for FY 2013, if awarded, and
authorizing the City to pay the match in the amount of $13,442.00; and authorizing the City Manager
to execute any necessary and related documents
(Presentation by Health Services Director Sandra Villarreal)
15. Consideration of adopting a Resolution ratifying the application for 1115 Waiver Funds in the amount
of $960,000.00.00 from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission to establish a sexually
transmitted disease clinic at the City of San Angelo-Tom Green County Health Department which
requires the City to contribute a forty percent (40%) match in funds in an amount of $400,000.00 over
a four (4) year period beginning FY 2013; and authorizing the City to accept such 1115 Waiver Funds
beginning FY 2013 and continuing through FY 2016, if awarded, and authorizing the City to pay the
City Council Agenda Page 3 of 4 December 4, 2012

4. match in the amount of $400,000.00; and authorizing the City Manager to execute any necessary and
related documents
(Presentation by Health Services Director Sandra Villarreal)
16. Discussion and consideration of the possibility of issuing rebates of Water Fees and any action related
thereto
(Presentation by Budget Manager Morgan Trainer)
17. Second Public Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending the 2012-2013 Budget
for encumbrances, restricted and dedicated moneys, incomplete projects, and grants which necessitate
budget amendments
(Presentation by Budget Manager Morgan Trainer)
18. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a lease
agreement with the San Angelo Performing Arts Coalition (SAPAC) providing for the lease of office
space by SAPAC on the west mezzanine of the City Hall Building
(Presentation by Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane)
19. Consideration and possible action regarding a recommendation by the City of San Angelo
Development Corporation to approve the expenditure of up to $23,000.00 from half cent sales tax
funds for cabinets, shelving, guest waiting furniture, décor/artwork, receptionist desk, and landscaping
for the new Business Resource Center
(Presentation by Community and Economic Development Director Shawn Lewis)
20. Discussion and consideration of closing City of San Angelo offices on Monday, December 31, 2012
and Tuesday, January 1, 2013 to coincide with Tom Green County offices New Year’s holiday
(Requested by Councilmembers Adams and Silvas)
F. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES
21. Consideration of and possible action on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session, if needed
22. Consideration of approving various Board nominations by Council and designated Councilmembers:
a. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board: Anthony Delacruz (SMD1), Mike Campbell (SMD2), Louis
Perez (SMD3), Mary Palos (SMD4), Donald Barnhart (SMD5), Debbie Cross (SMD6), and Gloria
Henderson (Mayor)
23. Consideration of approving appointments to Mental Health Mental Retardation (MHMR) Services for
the Concho Valley Board of Trustees recommended by Liaison Representative Committee
24. Announcements and consideration of Future Agenda Items
25. Adjournment
Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter
551, Tuesday, November 27, 2012, at 6:00 P.M.
________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
City Council Agenda Page 4 of 4 December 4, 2012

5. CITY COUNCIL MINUTE RECORD
The City of San Angelo Page 111
Tuesday, November 20, 2012 Vol. 104
OPEN SESSION
BE IT REMEMBERED City Council convened in a regular meeting at 9:00 A.M., Tuesday, November 20,
2012, in the San Angelo McNease Convention Center, 500 Rio Concho Drive, San Angelo, Texas. All duly
authorized members of the Council, to-wit:
Mayor, Alvin New
Councilmember Paul Alexander
Councilmember Dwain Morrison
Councilmember Johnny Silvas
Councilmember Fredd B. Adams, II
Councilmember Kendall Hirschfeld
Councilmember Charlotte Farmer
were present and acting, thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon, the following business was transacted:
An invocation was given by David Smith, Pastor of the Word of Life Church and pledge was led by Meagan
Thompson, Kindergartener at Fort Concho Elementary and daughter of employees Juanita Thompson, Water
Billing, and Steven Thompson, Information Technology.
RECOGNITION
Ramon Lozada, employee of the Concho Valley Transit District, for his effort in assisting a fellow citizen in his
time of need.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Councilmember Silvas commented on the water service reconnect fee charge and requested the item be
considered on a future agenda.
Mayor New announced the memorial for Hunt for Heroes event at Kids Kingdom, November 21, 2012, at 12:15
p.m. and invited all to attend.
CONSENT AGENDA
APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 6, 2012 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
AWARD OF BIDS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY RELATED DOCUMENTS:
FD-04-12: 2013 EMS supplies, Bound Tree, MidWest Medical Supply, Henry Schein, and Quad Med, up to
$117,912.00 (Submitted by Fire Chief Brian Dunn)
WU-13-12: Water Quality Laboratory Inventory Supplies, Various Vendors: Environmental Express, Fox
Scientific, Inc., and Hach Compa, up to $35,000.00 (Submitted by Assistant Director of Water Utilities Tom
Kerr)
WU-11-12: Water Utilities Inventory Supplies, Various Vendors: Benmark Supply, Municipal Waterworks, HD
Supply Waterworks, Morrison Supply, Plastic Wholesale Plumbing, and Western Industrial Supply, up to
$200,000.00 (Submitted by Assistant Director of Water Utilities Tom Kerr)

6. Page 112 Minutes
Vol. 104 November 20, 2012
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM
(TAX-RESALE) DEED CONVEYING THE FOLLOWING TAX LOT: (SUBMITTED BY REAL
ESTATE ADMINISTRATOR CINDY PREAS) (PAGE 119, #2012-11-165)
507 N FARR STREET, (GONZALEZ), LOT 16, BLOCK 9, MILES ADDITION, $11,000, SUIT NO. B-
03-0099-T
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH GOODFELLOW AIR FORCE BASE READINESS
AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT FLIGHT PROVIDING FOR EMERGENCY AND MUTUAL
AID ASSISTANCE IN PREPARATION FOR AND RESPONSE TO DISASTER OR CIVIL
EMERGENCIES (SUBMITTED BY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR RON PERRY)
(PAGE 121, #2012-11-166)
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE FY 2012 BULLETPROOF VEST PARTNERSHIP GRANT IN THE SUM OF TWELVE
THOUSAND FIVE AND 25/100 DOLLARS ($12,005.25), AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE SUCH GRANT AWARD AND RELATED DOCUMENTS AS MAY BE
NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT FOR ACCEPTANCE OF THE GRANT (SUBMITTED BY POLICE
CHIEF TIM VASQUEZ) (Discussed In Regular Session)
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR
HIS DESIGNEE TO APPLY FOR AND ACCEPT DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT FUNDS IN THE SUM
OF $24,978.00, FROM THE TEXAS PRESERVATION TRUST FUND, TEXAS HISTORICAL
COMMISSION, FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS AND EXPENSES INCURRED FOR THE
PRESERVATION AND RESTORATION OF THE HISTORIC CITY HALL BUILDING, AND TO
COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FUNDING AGREEMENT (SUBMITTED BY
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER RICK WEISE) (Discussed in Regular Session)
SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ABANDONMENT OF
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN MILLER J A SUBDIVISION & F T ADDITION, BLOCK 49 IN
CENTRAL SAN ANGELO (SUBMITTED BY PLANNING MANAGER AJ FAWVER) (PAGE 123,
#2012-11-167)
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF THE FOLLOWING
STREET SEGMENT, TO WIT: A 20' X 140' SEGMENT RUNNING NORTH TO SOUTH BETWEEN
LOTS 1-5 AND LOT 6 IN BLOCK 49 OF THE BEAVER F T ADDITION AND MILLER J A
SUBDIVISION, IN CENTRAL SAN ANGELO; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO
THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND
DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS
SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE RE-ESTABLISHING NIGHT TIME
CURFEW HOURS FOR MINORS AND RELATED MATTERS (SUBMITTED BY POLICE CHIEF
TIM VASQUEZ) (Discussed in Regular Session)
AN ORDINANCE READOPTING CHAPTER 8, ENTITLED "OFFENSES AND NUISANCES,"
ARTICLE 8.800, ENTITLED "CURFEW HOURS FOR MINORS,” SECTIONS 8.801 THROUGH 8.807
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO; DEFINING TERMS;
CREATING OFFENSES FOR MINORS, PARENTS AND GUARDIANS OF MINORS AND BUSINESS
ESTABLISHMENTS VIOLATING CURFEW REGULATIONS; PROVIDING DEFENSES;
PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT; PROVIDING FOR REVIEW

7. Minutes Page 113
November 20, 2012 Vol. 104
OF THIS ORDINANCE WITHIN THREE (3) YEARS AFTER THE DATE OF ADOPTION;
PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE
Motion, to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented, was made by Councilmember Hirschfeld and seconded
by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously.
REGULAR AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FY 2012
BULLETPROOF VEST PARTNERSHIP GRANT IN THE SUM OF TWELVE THOUSAND FIVE AND
25/100 DOLLARS ($12,005.25), AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
SUCH GRANT AWARD AND RELATED DOCUMENTS AS MAY BE NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT
FOR ACCEPTANCE OF THE GRANT (Page 125, #2012-11-168)
Responding to questions from Councilmember Farmer, Mr. Dane informed to date auditing procedures been not
been put in place to track any grant.
Council members directed staff to create an itemized list of all grants, by department, grant date, received, and
disbursed in order to keep up with public dollars and accounting of any grant.
Motion, to adopt the Resolution, as presented, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by
Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
APPLY FOR AND ACCEPT DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT FUNDS IN THE SUM OF $24,978.00, FROM
THE TEXAS PRESERVATION TRUST FUND, TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION, FOR
REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS AND EXPENSES INCURRED FOR THE PRESERVATION AND
RESTORATION OF THE HISTORIC CITY HALL BUILDING, AND TO COMPLY WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE FUNDING AGREEMENT (Page 127, #2012-11-169)
Motion, to adopt the Resolution, as presented, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by
Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously.
SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE RE-ESTABLISHING NIGHT TIME
CURFEW HOURS FOR MINORS AND RELATED MATTERS (Page 129, #2012-11-170)
AN ORDINANCE READOPTING CHAPTER 8, ENTITLED "OFFENSES AND NUISANCES," ARTICLE
8.800, ENTITLED "CURFEW HOURS FOR MINORS,” SECTIONS 8.801 THROUGH 8.807 OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO; DEFINING TERMS; CREATING
OFFENSES FOR MINORS, PARENTS AND GUARDIANS OF MINORS AND BUSINESS
ESTABLISHMENTS VIOLATING CURFEW REGULATIONS; PROVIDING DEFENSES; PROVIDING
FOR ENFORCEMENT BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT; PROVIDING FOR REVIEW OF THIS
ORDINANCE WITHIN THREE (3) YEARS AFTER THE DATE OF ADOPTION; PROVIDING A
PENALTY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
Councilmember Farmer requested the item to be discussed in the regular agenda due to a request from a citizen.
Chief Vasquez presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the permanent
Supplemental Minute Record.
Councilmember Silvas requested the information presented today be displayed and available to the public via
various advertising mediums.

8. Page 114 Minutes
Vol. 104 November 20, 2012
Public comment was made by Citizens Betsy Ryan and Jim Turner.
Motion, to adopt the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Adams and seconded by
Councilmember Hirschfeld.
Responding to questions from Councilmember Alexander, Chief Vasquez stated if a juvenile is out in public
after the designated curfew, the juvenile may receive a citation.
Responding to questions from Councilmember Adams, Chief Vasquez stated there is not a threshold as to the
number of citations issued to determine whether the ordinance is no longer needed; however, he cautioned the
Council on eliminating this valuable tool available to officers.
A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously.
PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO’S FY2011 COMPREHENSIVE
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) BY THE CITY’S AUDITING FIRM
Assistant City Manager / Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane and the City’s external auditing firm, Freddy
Moore and Gayla Thorn of Armstrong, Backus and Company presented background information.
Auditors informed the Council on the following findings:
• Per Governmental Accounting Standards Board Financial Accounting rules, the Texas Municipal
Retirement System unfunded liability will be reported in the balance statements noting that such reporting
will affect the City’s net assets.
• Single audit finding: Full amount of grant received in August 2011 but only spent a portion of the grant.
Per accounting rules, grants must be segregated to ensure any interest made on the funds is returned to
grantor. City staff deposited grant in a pooled account and there is no way to determine how much interest
was made on the grant.
• Passenger Facilities Charge Program: An expenditure was made in one year but reported in another year.
Proper accounting and accrual of expenditures ensures that the expenditures are recorded in the year in
which they are incurred.
Auditors noted all three instances resulted in non-accounting employees monitoring the grants and not
necessarily understanding the financial component of tracking grant requirements.
Councilmember Farmer recommended the City assign a designated staff person to oversee grants, specifically
grant compliance. City Manager Daniel Valenzuela stated staff is currently exploring a solution to resolve this
issue. Mr. Dane reported, to date, no interest or fine has been paid by the City.
General discussion was held on reducing unfunded liabilities by a compensated balance in place, unfunded
retiree benefits, implementing a plan to cover these unfunded liabilities, and conducting reviews of the required
rate of return on the retirement systems. City Council requested staff disclose these types of liabilities whether
required on the statement or not. The Auditors welcomed Council’s request so they may tailor and conduct their
report findings during the audit process.
Responding from questions by Council, Mr. Valenzuela remarked he was satisfied with the results of the audit
noting the standard procedures have been followed, welcomed suggestions regarding the reporting
methodology, and informed he will be closely involved in the next audit process.

9. Minutes Page 115
November 20, 2012 Vol. 104
RECESS
At 10:08 A.M., Mayor New called a recess.
RECONVENE
At 10:24 A.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted:
PRESENTATION OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3RD QUARTER REPORTS: ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AND THE CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU (CVB)
VP Marketing & Recruitment John Dugan and CVB Vice President Pamela Miller presented background
information.
General discussion was held on the progress of the strategic plan, success of attending and leads obtained from
various exposition events, available tax incentives, Smith report on occupancy of hotels – weekly versus one
night; stated reasons for lost business due to lack of rooms, rates are too high, or lack of a full service hotel; and
the Chamber’s efforts to recruit volunteers for Ft. Concho Christmas event. Ms. Miller noted tourist view San
Angelo as a great get-a-way from the big city.
POSTPONEMENT OF ADOPTING A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS
DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS
COALITION (SAPAC) PROVIDING FOR THE LEASE OF OFFICE SPACE BY SAPAC ON THE WEST
MEZZANINE OF THE CITY HALL BUILDING
Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane presented background information.
General discussion was held on the insurance requirements for City Hall, the city’s responsibility to provide
structural coverage for city hall and auditorium, the proposed lease agreement for the Mezzanine area,
contractual concerns expressed regarding SAPAC’s responsibility and benefits received on behalf of the City,
and what benefits the City receives from this contractual obligation.
Mayor suggested staff present all related matters so Council may review and possibly support the agreement.
Council concurred and suggested postponing the item to a future agenda. Council concurred.
POSTPONEMENT OF THE DISCUSSION AND PRESENTATION ON THE WATER CONSERVATION
CREDIT PROGRAM
Mayor New postponed the item to a future meeting. Council concurred.
DISCUSSION ON COSTS RELATED TO TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM (TMRS) COST
OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT INCREASE
Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane presented background information.
General discussion was held on the legal constraints, state statute requirements, and the $1M cost to the City
should the benefit be adjusted and increased.
Mayor expressed his concern that the information presented was insufficient to render action, specifically
whether Council should consider if 7% or 14% are the correct percentages, the restrictions and implications of
this action, and how these changes will affect the entire benefit for employees and retirees.
City Manager Daniel Valenzuela stated this topic will be included in the strategic plan discussions scheduled for
January 2013 and discussions will include short and long term plans.

10. Page 116 Minutes
Vol. 104 November 20, 2012
Councilmember Farmer suggested forming a committee to review the issues associated with TMRS. She
suggested the committee member composition should include the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and
other key members.
Motion, to form a committee, was made by Councilmember Farmer. Motion failed due to lack of a second.
General discussion was held to commit these discussion items as Council addresses the dental and retirement
benefits during the budget process, including funding mechanisms. Mr. Valenzuela stated as the topic is
considered during the January 2013 workshop, discussion should also include establishing a plan of action, and
thereafter, formalize a committee.
Public comments were made by Retirees Russell Smith and Greg Mackey.
Councilmember Adams suggested inviting Mr. Smith to participate in the committee.
DISCUSSION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGETED CAPITAL FUNDING AS IT RELATES TO THE
2012-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
Budget Manager Morgan Trainer presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the
permanent Supplemental Minute Record.
General discussion was held on providing and identifying funding for the proposed projects, disclosing how
funding will be used, conducting the appropriate reviews as associated fees are increased, and revealing the
impact of the increase fees thereby potentially reducing the property tax rate.
City Manager Daniel Valenzuela stated staff will recommend a priority list with the related funding
mechanisms.
Councilmember Alexander requested staff forward the key dates for further participation by City Council
members as well as the public. Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane stated the dates
may be adjusted due to the strategic workshop meeting in January.
City Engineer Clinton Bailey provided a brief update on the stormwater priority project.
Councilmember Farmer requested an update on the various CIP projects submitted and approved in the
planning document since the inception of the plan. She also suggested the updates should be available on the
website for public review.
RECESS
At 12:15 P.M., Mayor New called a recess.
EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION
Council did not convened in Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open
Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to
Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to a
company or companies with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations
and which the City of San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo
RECONVENE
At 1:00 P.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted:

11. Minutes Page 117
November 20, 2012 Vol. 104
FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2012-2013
BUDGET FOR ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTED AND DEDICATED MONEYS, INCOMPLETE
PROJECTS, AND GRANTS WHICH NECESSITATE BUDGET AMENDMENTS
Budget Manager Morgan Trainer presented background information.
General discussion was held on the website budget item, specifically regarding the recommended amount of
$90K proposed by staff. Staff provided the minutes from May 1, 2012 when the design for the website was
approved clarifying Council had authorized $40K. Council suggested removing the item from this Ordinance
and staff present the item with their recommendation on the scope of the project with all associated background
information including prior Council approval at a future meeting.
Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, with the exception of the website item for $90K, was made by
Councilmember Morrison and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. Motion carried unanimously.
FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPEED ZONES
ON US HIGHWAY 87 FRONTAGE ROADS
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, ARTICLE 10.200 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPEED LIMIT OF 45
M.P.H. ON BOTH EAST AND WEST FRONTAGE ROADS OF US HIGHWAY 87 BEGINNING AT THE
INTERSECTION OF US HIGHWAY 87 AND FARM TO MARKET ROAD 2105 EXTENDING SOUTH
2.553 MILES, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
City Engineer Clinton Bailey presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the
permanent Supplemental Minute Record.
Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Hirschfeld and seconded by
Councilmember Morrison. Motion carried unanimously.
TIE VOTE TO CLOSE CITY OF SAN ANGELO OFFICES ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND
TUESDAY, JANUARY 1, 2013 TO COINCIDE WITH TOM GREEN COUNTY OFFICES NEW YEAR’S
HOLIDAY
Human Resources Director Lisa Marley presented background information.
Motion, to close City offices on Monday, December 31, 2012, as presented, was made by Councilmember
Silvas and seconded by Councilmember Alexander. AYE: Alexander, Morrison, and Silvas. NAY: New,
Hirschfeld, and Farmer. Motion tied 3-3, thereby rendering the issue null and void.
FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES
CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION
No action was taken on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session.
APPROVAL OF VARIOUS BOARD NOMINATIONS BY COUNCIL AND DESIGNATED
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Ft. Concho Museum Board: James Dusek (SMD6) and Paul Stanley (Mayor)
Motion, to approve various board nominations by Council and designated Councilmembers, was made by
Mayor New and seconded by Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously.

12. Page 118 Minutes
Vol. 104 November 20, 2012
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
City Manager Daniel Valenzuela distributed the proposed December 4, 2012 Agenda and solicited Council
comments and suggestions.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion, to adjourn, was made by Councilmember Hirschfeld and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion
carried unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 1:27 P.M.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
___________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
In accordance with Chapter 2, Article 2.300, of the Official Code of the City of San Angelo, the minutes of this
meeting consist of the preceding Minute Record and the Supplemental Minute Record. Details on Council
meetings may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office or a video of the entire meeting may be purchased from
the Public Information Officer at 481-2727. (Portions of the Supplemental Minute Record video tape recording
may be distorted due to equipment malfunction or other uncontrollable factors.)

13. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: 11/14/12
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Chief Tim Vasquez
Subject: Agenda Item for December 4, 2012 Council Meeting
Contact: Chief Tim Vasquez, 657-4336
Caption: Consent Item
Consideration of approving a maintenance service contract for San Angelo
Public Safety Communications in the amount of $140,231.88 for calendar year
2013 between the City of San Angelo and Intergraph authorizing 24/7
technical support and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute
said maintenance contract and any renewal contract thereafter provided the
cost does not increase more than 4% each subsequent year
Summary: This is an annual service contract that provides 24/7 technical support for Intergraph Public
Safety products. This service can not be supported or purchased locally.
History: The City of San Angelo selected Intergraph as its Public Safety Software vendor in 1999 and
each year following a maintenance contract has been purchased.
Financial Impact: The Intergraph maintenance contract for this year is $140,231.88. The funds for the
contract are budgeted in the San Angelo Public Safety Communications Budget FY 2012-2013.
Related Vision Item (if applicable): N/A
Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Intergraph maintenance
contract.
Attachments: Intergraph quote # 1-6W7B3F, Intergraph Maintenance Terms, and US
Maintenance Terms
Presentation:None
Publication: N/A
Reviewed by Service Area Director: Chief Tim Vasquez, Police Department, November 14,
2012
Adopted: 5/30/03
Revised: 1/16/08

17. Security, Government & Infrastructure (SG&I)
U.S. Maintenance Terms and Conditions
for Software
This document (“Terms and Conditions”) and the Quote to which these Terms and Conditions are
attached set forth the terms and conditions for the maintenance of software and related support
services by Intergraph Corporation, doing business as the Security, Government and Infrastructure
Division (“Intergraph”) for Customer.
1. DEFINITIONS
1.1. “Affiliate” means any entity or person controlled by or under common control of Intergraph
Corporation. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term "control" means ownership,
directly or indirectly, of equity securities entitling the owner to exercise in the aggregate
equal or more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the voting power of the entity in question.
For the avoidance of doubt, any Affiliate of Intergraph Corporation is as well deemed an
Affiliate of any other Affiliate of Intergraph Corporation; also Intergraph Corporation is an
Affiliate of any of its Affiliates.
1.2. “Agreement” means (1) the binding contract incorporating these Terms and Conditions as
well as the Quote submitted to Customer under Section 2 and/or, if applicable, (2) the
binding contract incorporating a Quote submitted to Customer under Section 3.2 and/or
Section 12.1 as well as the maintenance service contract terms and conditions referenced
therein.
1.3. “Coverage Period” means the period of performance set forth in the Quote.
1.4. “Covered Products” means the software listed on the Quote for which Services are to be
provided to Customer by Intergraph. Covered Products shall also include additional copies
of the software (i) where the original software is already covered by the Agreement and (ii)
for which additional licenses are purchased or otherwise obtained by Customer during the
Coverage Period. Covered Products may include Software Products, as well as Third Party
Software.
1.5. “Customer” means the entity or person purchasing Services.
1.6. “Quote” means a quotation for Services submitted to Customer by Intergraph or an
authorized Intergraph partner, along with a product quotation at time of purchase of the
product to be maintained. according to Section 2, or a quotation for Services submitted to
Customer by Intergraph, according to, Section 3.2 and/or Section 12.1.
1.7. “Services” means the maintenance and support services for Covered Products that are
further described in the Agreement.
1.8. “Software Product” includes Intergraph’s or Intergraph’s Affiliate’s computer software and all
of the contents of the files, disk(s), CD-ROM(s) or other media with which the software is
provided, including any templates, data, printed materials, and “online” or electronic
documentation, all copies, and any Updates of such Software Products. Software Products
Page 1 of 14

18. are subject to all of the terms and conditions of the End-User License Agreement (“EULA”)
provided with the Software Product.
1.9. “Third Party Software” means computer software or other technology in which any person or
entity, other than Intergraph or Intergraph’s Affiliate, has any right, title or interest, including
any restrictions or obligations (such as obligations to obtain consents or approvals and
restrictions that may be eliminated only by obtaining such consents or approvals) applicable
to the computer software or technology, but does not include software embedded in the
Software Products by license from third parties. The use of Third Party Software is subject to
all of the terms and conditions of the third party’s software license or similar agreement
(“SLA”) provided with the Third Party Software.
1.10. “Update(s)” means any Upgrade, modified version, fix, patch and/or update of Covered
Products. The use of Updates is subject to all of the terms and conditions of the EULA or
SLA provided with Customer’s current version of the Covered Products.
1.11. “Upgrade(s)” means each new release of Covered Products. Upgrades require a full
installation and may be provided with a separate EULA or SLA. Any EULA or SLA delivered
with the Upgrade will supersede any EULA or SLA associated with prior releases of the
Covered Products.
2. AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES
By either (a) returning a signed Quote; (b) submitting a signed purchase order referencing a Quote; (c)
paying any charges as set forth on a Quote; or (d) accepting delivery of Services as set forth on a
Quote, Customer authorizes Intergraph to provide the Services for Covered Products during the
Coverage Period in accordance with the Agreement. The Services will be provided by Intergraph in
accordance with the Scope of Coverage as set forth in Section 5. The Agreement shall only become
binding and effective upon the written acceptance by Intergraph or the first delivery of the Services set
forth in the Quote, whichever is earlier.
3. TERM
3.1. Term. This Agreement shall begin, retroactively (if applicable), on the first calendar day of the
first month of the applicable Coverage Period, and shall expire at the end of the Coverage
Period unless terminated earlier as provided in Section 18, or renewed by mutual agreement
of the parties in accordance with Section 3.2. The Coverage Period shall be for whole months
only.
3.2. Renewal. Approximately ninety (90) days prior to the expiration date of any Coverage Period,
Intergraph will submit to Customer a renewal Quote that includes pricing for the upcoming
Coverage Period. Section 2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the formation of the Agreement
based on the renewal Quote as well as the maintenance service contract terms and
conditions referenced therein or made available to Customer together with the renewal
Quote. If the Agreement is not entered into based on the renewal Quote as well as the
maintenance service contract terms and conditions referenced therein, Intergraph, after the
preceding Coverage Period has expired, shall be entitled to discontinue Services for the
affected Covered Products, including access to system support or knowledge base, and/or
end the ability of Customer to log or check support requests.
4. REINSTATEMENT OF MAINTENANCE SUPPORT COVERAGE
4.1. Lapse in Software Maintenance Coverage. To reinstate Services after any termination or
suspension thereof, Customer must pay a reinstatement fee. The Coverage Period for any
reinstated Services (the “Renewal Coverage Period”) shall begin on the first day after the
Page 2 of 14

19. expiration or termination of the last paid-in-full Coverage Period and extend until the next
purchase anniversary date of the lapsed Covered Products. The reinstatement fee will equal
twenty-five percent (25%) of the past due maintenance charges (rounded up to whole months
only) for the Renewal Coverage Period, and shall be in addition to the total maintenance
charges due for the Renewal Coverage Period, all calculated at the current maintenance list
price. Upon request of Customer, Intergraph will provide a Quote for the Renewal Coverage
Period, to include the reinstatement fee, which is applicable only for reinstatement made in
the then-current month.
4.2. Failure to Obtain Maintenance Coverage. In the event Services were not purchased at the
time that the Covered Product was originally purchased, in order to obtain Services,
Customer must pay one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of all maintenance payments
from the date the original Covered Product was purchased up to the date the Services are
actually purchased, plus one hundred percent (100%) of the remaining Coverage Period that
expires upon the anniversary date of the original Covered Product purchase, all calculated at
the current maintenance list price. The Coverage Period for such Covered Products will begin
on the first day of the month in which the Covered Products were originally purchased.
5. SCOPE OF COVERAGE FOR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS
Services described in this Section apply to Software Products only. Services for Third Party Software
are set forth in Section 10.
Intergraph offers two levels of Services for Software Products included in the Covered Products:
Standard Support and Premium Support. Under both levels of Services, Intergraph shall provide
reasonable commercial efforts to aid in the diagnosis and correction of defects in and provide general
advice as to the use of the Software Products included in the Covered Products. The level of Services
will be set forth on the Quote and will include the following:
5.1. Standard Support: Standard Support will include and be limited to the following:
5.1.1. Help Desk Support. Out-of-the-box functionality support via the Help Desk (telephone
or eService via Intergraph’s Customer Support Web Site where available at
http://esupport.intergraph.com). Phone support for all priority levels of software errors
is available on Monday through Friday from 8AM – 5PM at Customer’s local time,
excluding Intergraph-observed holidays. Local variances in support hours will be
posted on the Customer Support Web Site or applicable local support website, or can
be determined by contacting Customer’s local Intergraph office.
5.1.2. Updates. Access to all available Updates of Software Products included in the
Covered Products. Intergraph will notify Customer when Updates are made available
for any Software Products for which Service has been purchased, by way of posting
notices of such to the “Support Notices and Announcements” section on the Customer
Support Web Site or applicable local support website or via direct notification by
Intergraph. If applicable, Customer may also register on the Customer Support Web
Site or applicable local support website to automatically receive email notifications
when a new release of a Software Product is made available by Intergraph. Updates
are shipped to Customer upon Customer request. Intergraph is not obligated to
produce any Updates.
5.1.3. Knowledge Base. Twenty-four-hour-per-day/seven-day-per-week access to problem
Knowledge Base, an on-line self-help tool.
5.2. Premium Support: Premium Support will include all of the features available under Standard
Support. Additionally, when the software error is considered to be critical (meaning
Page 3 of 14

20. production is down), then phone support is also available after-hours and on
Intergraph-observed holidays.
Intergraph may not provide both levels of support for all Software Products in all countries. Customer
may choose any level of Services offered, however all Software Products included in the Covered
Products under the Agreement must have the same level of Services when available.
Services are only available for the current version and the one version prior to the current version of a
particular Software Product. Services are limited to the specific Software Products listed on the Quote
and functioning on the appropriate Intergraph-supported operating system.
6. MINIMUM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS; CUSTOMER’S OBLIGATIONS
Performance of Services by Intergraph is specifically conditioned upon the following minimum system
requirements and fulfillment by Customer of the following obligations (collectively, minimum system
requirements and customer obligations hereinafter referred to as “Customer Obligations”):
6.1. Customer’s hardware and operating system software must meet the minimum system
requirements specified by Intergraph and made available to Customer upon request.
6.2. Customer’s system must have input and output devices that enable the use of Intergraph’s
diagnostic programs and supplemental tests. The specifications of such devices shall be
made available to Customer by Intergraph upon request.
6.3. Customer will be responsible for any required adjustments or updates to its hardware and/or
operating system software required to accommodate Updates of Covered Products.
6.4. Customer will ensure availability of its own system technical support personnel so that
Intergraph can fulfill its Service obligations.
6.5. When reporting problems to Intergraph’s Help Desk, Customer will provide a complete
problem description, along with all necessary documents and information that is available to
Customer and required by Intergraph to diagnose and resolve the problem. Customer will
grant all necessary access to all required systems as well as to the Covered Products, and
any other reasonable assistance needed.
6.6. Customer will carry out any reasonable instructions on troubleshooting or circumvention of
the problem provided by Intergraph through the Authorized Contact (as defined below in
Section 8.1) immediately and in conformity with these instructions, and will install any
necessary patches, defect corrections or new versions from Intergraph.
6.7. Customer is solely responsible for assuring the compatibility of non-Intergraph products with
products provided by Intergraph.
6.8. Customer is solely responsible for ensuring its systems, software, and data are adequately
backed up. Intergraph will not be liable for lost data.
In addition, Customer shall provide for any other requirements reasonably specified by Intergraph and
related to the rendition of the Services to be met.
If Customer fails to fulfill its Customer Obligations, Intergraph is entitled to bill Intergraph’s time and
effort made necessary by Customer’s failure at Intergraph’s currently stated hourly rates.
7. EXCLUDED SOFTWARE SERVICES
Services for the following are outside the scope of this Agreement and may be available under
separate agreement at an additional charge (collectively “Excluded Services”):
7.1. Installation of any Covered Product, Update, or interface software
7.2. Network configuration
7.3. Configuration or customization of Covered Products to customer requirements.
7.4. System-level tuning and optimization and system administration support
Page 4 of 14

21. 7.5. Programming or software development
7.6. Training
7.7. Services required because the Authorized Contact is not available or is not trained in
accordance with Section 8
7.8. On-site Services
7.9. Services outside of the regular business hours associated with the applicable level of
Services
7.10. Services required due to modifications of Covered Products by Customer. In the case of
Intergraph software modules which assist in the creation and use of Customer software, the
performance of Services under the Agreement is restricted to unmodified components of
these Covered Products
7.11. Services required due to use other than in the ordinary manner intended for the Covered
Products, or use in a manner that contravenes terms hereunder, or Customer’s disregard of
the installation and operating instructions according to the documentation provided with the
Covered Products
7.12. Services required due to failure of software or hardware not supplied by Intergraph and not
covered in the Agreement
7.13. Services required due to Customer’s use of hardware or software that does not meet
Intergraph specifications or failure of Customer to maintain or perform industry standard
maintenance on Customer’s hardware or software
7.14. Services required due to software or portions thereof that were incorrectly installed or
configured, or use in an environment inconsistent with the support environment specified by
Intergraph, or used with peripherals, operational equipment or accessories not conforming to
Intergraph’s specifications
7.15. Services required due to cases of force majeure, especially lightning strikes, fire or flood or
other events not caused through Intergraph’s fault.
7.16. Services required due to customer’s failure to fulfill the Customer Obligations set forth in
Section 6
7.17. Services required due to faulty or incomplete Customer data.
When ordered by Customer, Excluded Services or other software maintenance support services that
are outside the scope of this Agreement will be billed by Intergraph according to the stated hourly rates
and material prices in effect at the time such service is performed.
8. SYSTEM SUPPORT TECHNICIAN
8.1. Customer will appoint a minimum of two and a maximum of three contact people who are
each authorized to make use of the Services (“Authorized Contacts”).
8.2. Customer must make sure that the Authorized Contacts have adequate expertise and
experience to make possible a targeted and professionally accurate description of
malfunctions and make it possible for Intergraph to handle them efficiently. Authorized
Contacts must have successfully completed Intergraph product training or complete it at the
next available scheduled opportunity, for those products for which formal training is available.
Customer will bear the cost of this training. Customer is obligated to select only those
personnel for this task who are suitable for it by means of training and function, and who have
knowledge of Customer’s operating system, network, and hardware and software systems.
Customer agrees to promptly notify Intergraph of any replacement of an Authorized Contact.
9. REMOTE ACCESS
Customer will permit Intergraph to electronically access Customer’s system via SecureLink™.
SecureLink™ is a tool for providing secure, auditable remote access to Customer’s system in order for
Intergraph support personnel (“Customer Support”) to effectively troubleshoot critical or complex
Page 5 of 14

22. problems and to expedite resolution of such issues. The Authorized Contacts should be available to
assist Intergraph Customer Support as needed during this entire process. Customer Support will only
access Customer’s system with the knowledge and consent of Customer. For local variances specific
to the use of remote access tools other than SecureLink™, Customer should contact the local
Intergraph support office.
10. THIRD PARTY SOFTWARE
Support and Updates of Third Party Software shall be provided in the fashion and to the extent or
duration that Intergraph is authorized to provide such by the third party manufacturer of the Third Party
Software, and such Third Party Software Services may be subject to additional terms and conditions of
the third party manufacturer of the Third Party Software.
Services and Updates for any Third Party Software that are not listed on the Quote must be obtained
from the third party owner of the products or their designated representative.
11. REQUIRED COVERAGE
11.1. Multiple or Interdependent Licenses. Customer may not decline maintenance for individual
licenses of a Covered Product for which Customer has multiple copies under Service at one
site or for Covered Products that are being used interdependently at a single site, except in
accordance with the relinquishment process described in Section 12.2.
11.2. Prerequisite Licenses. All prerequisite Intergraph software licenses that are necessary to
operate the Covered Products for which Customer desires Services under the Agreement
must also be included as Covered Products and listed on the Quote.
12. ADDITIONS AND REMOVALS OF COVERED PRODUCTS
12.1. Additions of Covered Products to Maintenance.
12.1.1. Additional Software Products from Intergraph. In the event Customer purchases
additional licenses of Software Products from Intergraph during the term of this
Agreement, Intergraph will provide Customer with a written extension Quote that
reflects the additional licenses, the effective date of Service, and charges for the
additional licenses, pursuant to the Agreement.
12.1.2. Additional Software Products from a third party. In the event Customer obtains
additional licenses of Software Products from an authorized reseller or by any other
means, Customer agrees to promptly notify Intergraph in writing about the newly
acquired Software Products, and upon receipt of such notice, Intergraph will provide
Customer with a written extension Quote that reflects the additional licenses, the
effective date on which Intergraph may commence the Services with respect to the
copies of the Software Product pertaining to the additional licenses, and the charges
that would be due in return for these Services pursuant to the Agreement.
12.1.3. Section 2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the formation of the Agreement based on the
extension Quote submitted to Customer under Section 12.1.1 or Section 12.1.2 as well
as the maintenance service contract terms and conditions referenced therein or made
available to Customer together with the extension Quote. If the Agreement is not
entered into based on the extension Quote as well as the maintenance service
contract terms and conditions referenced therein, then the terms and conditions in
Section 4 regarding reinstatement of Services will apply to the additional licenses of
Software Products. If, however, the additional Software Products are multiple,
interdependent, or prerequisite licenses as described in Section 11 above, Services
Page 6 of 14

23. may not be declined, and Services and the appropriate monthly charges will begin on
the effective date as shown on the extension Quote.
12.1.4. Additional Software Products via Software Transfer Policy. Customer shall purchase
Services on all additional licenses of Software Products for a site obtained via software
license transfer. Any such software license transfers shall be in accordance with the
then-current Intergraph Software Transfer Policy and the EULA or other applicable
Software License Agreement delivered with the Software Product.
12.2. Removal of Covered Products from Maintenance. Either party may provide written notice to
the other party at least sixty (60) calendar days prior to the end of any Coverage Period of its
intent to remove any individual Covered Products from the Agreement for the renewal
period. Neither party may remove Covered Products except upon Agreement renewal.
Customer may not remove from the Agreement individual software licenses of a Covered
Product for which Customer has multiple copies under Service at one site or for Covered
Products that are being used interdependently at a single site, unless Customer has first
certified to Intergraph on a “Software Relinquishment Agreement” that the copies of the
Covered Product for which Customer desires to cease Services (the “Relinquished
Licenses”) for the renewal Coverage Period have been uninstalled and removed from its
system(s). Should Customer desire to reinstate Services for the Relinquished Licenses at a
later date, Customer must re-purchase the licenses at the then current list price.
13. PAYMENT
13.1. Terms of Payment. Charges for Services are due and payable annually and in advance. For
Customers desiring to pay quarterly and in advance instead of annually and in advance,
Customer must request a revised Quote which shall include a convenience fee increase of
fifteen percent (15%) of the total annual charges, which convenience fee Customer agrees
to pay. The convenience fee shall be prorated and charged to the four quarterly invoices. All
charges are due net thirty (30) calendar days from the date of invoice or prior to the
beginning of the applicable Coverage Period, whichever is earlier. Charges for Covered
Products added during a Coverage Period shall be prorated to the remaining months of the
Coverage Period, in whole month increments only, and such charges shall be due and
payable in full upon receipt of invoice.
13.2 Past Due Accounts. INTERGRAPH RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE TO
ANY CUSTOMER WHOSE ACCOUNT IS PAST DUE. At the discretion of Intergraph,
Customers who have not paid any charges when due (i) under this Agreement, (ii) under any
other agreement between the parties, or (iii) under any agreement between Intergraph and
Customer’s parent and/or subsidiary at least fifty percent (50%) owned by Customer, may
not be rendered Services until all past due charges are paid in full. Additionally, Intergraph
shall charge and Customer agrees to pay interest at the rate of two percent (2%) per month
or the maximum amount allowed by law, whichever is less, for all amounts not received
when due. The start of the Coverage Period shall not be postponed due to delayed payment
of any charges. If Intergraph is required to use a collection agency or attorney to collect
money owed by Customer, Customer agrees to pay the reasonable costs of collection.
These collection costs include, but are not limited to, any collection agency’s fees,
reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs.
13.3 Customer’s Responsibilities Concerning Invoice Questions. Subject to applicable law, if
Customer intends to dispute a charge or request a credit, Customer must contact Intergraph
within ten (10) calendar days of the date on the invoice. Customer waives any right to dispute
a charge or receive a credit for a charge or Services that Customer does not report within
such period.
Page 7 of 14

24. 14. CUSTOMER WARRANTIES
During the Coverage Period, Customer shall commit to the following:
14.1. Subject to Section 12.2, Customer warrants that for all Covered Products supported under
the Agreement, all licenses of a Covered Product for which Customer has multiple copies in
its possession and that are located at the site referenced on the Quote, and all prerequisite
licenses necessary to operate Covered Products, are listed on the Quote. If all like Covered
Products or prerequisite software licenses are not listed on the Quote, Customer agrees to
notify Intergraph so that Intergraph may issue a revised Quote to Customer.
14.2. Customer warrants that Services provided herein shall be utilized only for the quantity of
Covered Products licenses listed on the Quote.
14.3. Customer shall, and Customer shall cause each of Customer’s employees and
representatives to, comply with each and every term and condition of the EULA and/or SLA
applicable to the Covered Products supported under the Agreement.
15. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
15.1. Software License. Any Upgrades furnished hereunder shall remain the property of
Intergraph, Intergraph’s Affiliate or applicable third party, and are licensed in accordance
with the then current Intergraph EULA, EULA of Intergraph’s Affiliate or third party SLA,
which shall supersede any EULA or SLA associated with prior releases of the Software
Products or Third Party Software. Upon Customer’s request, Intergraph shall provide
customer with such EULA or SLA. Upon Intergraph’s request, Customer agrees to execute a
EULA or SLA, as applicable, for Covered Products provided without an included EULA or
SLA.
15.2. Confidential Information. Intergraph and Customer each acknowledge that they may be
furnished with, receive, or otherwise have access to information of or concerning the other
party which such party considers to be confidential, proprietary, a trade secret or otherwise
restricted. As used in this Agreement “Confidential Information” shall mean all information,
which may include third party information, in any form, furnished or made available directly or
indirectly by one party to the other that is marked confidential, restricted, proprietary, or with
a similar designation. The terms and conditions, and existence, of this Agreement shall be
deemed Confidential Information. Confidential Information also shall include, whether or not
designated “Confidential Information” (i) all specifications, designs, documents,
correspondence, software, documentation, data and other materials and work products
produced by either Intergraph or its subcontractors, and (ii) with respect to either party, all
information concerning the operations, financial affairs and businesses, and relations with its
employees and service providers.
Each party's Confidential Information shall remain the property of that party or relevant third
party except as expressly provided otherwise by the other provisions of this Agreement.
Customer and Intergraph shall each use at least the same degree of care, but in any event
no less than a reasonable degree of care, to prevent disclosing to third parties the
Confidential Information of the other as it employs to avoid unauthorized disclosure,
publication or dissemination of its own information of a similar nature.
The parties shall take reasonable steps to ensure that their respective employees comply
with these confidentiality provisions. This Section shall not apply to any particular
information which either party can demonstrate (i) was, at the time of disclosure to it,
Page 8 of 14

25. generally publicly available; (ii) after disclosure to it, is published or otherwise becomes
generally publicly available through no fault of the receiving party; (iii) was in the possession
of the receiving party at the time of disclosure to it without restriction on disclosure; (iv) was
received after disclosure to it from a third party who had a lawful right to disclose such
information to it without any obligation to restrict its further use or disclosure; or (v) was
independently developed by the receiving party without reference to Confidential Information
of the disclosing party. In addition, a party shall not be considered to have breached its
obligations by disclosing Confidential Information of the other party as required to satisfy any
legal requirement of a competent government body provided that, immediately upon
receiving any such request and to the extent that it may legally do so, such party advises the
other party promptly and prior to making such disclosure in order that the other party may
interpose an objection to such disclosure, take action to assure confidential handling of the
Confidential Information, or take such other action as it deems appropriate to protect the
Confidential Information.
16. LIMITED WARRANTIES; WARRANTY DISCLAIMERS
16.1. Limited Warranties.
16.1.1. Intergraph Services Warranty. Intergraph warrants for a period of thirty (30) days from
the date of Services that the Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, in the form of
a defect correction and/or maintenance services, will be performed with reasonable skill
and care in accordance with the requirements set forth herein, provided the Covered
Products for which the Services are provided are used under normal conditions and in
strict accordance with the terms and conditions herein. Customer agrees to promptly
notify Intergraph of any unauthorized use, repair, or modification, or misuse, as well as
suspected defects in any Services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
16.1.2. Intergraph Software Warranty. Intergraph warrants for a period of thirty (30) days from
the date of shipment of any Software Product that, under normal use, software delivery
media shall be free from defect in material or workmanship. Additional warranties for
Software Products may be provided in the applicable Intergraph Terms and Conditions
for Sale or other agreement between the parties governing the delivery of Software
Products.
16.1.3. Pass-Through Third Party Warranties. Third Party Software is only warranted
pursuant to a pass-through warranty to Customer from the applicable Third Party
Software manufacturer and only to the extent warranted by the applicable Third Party
Software manufacturer.
16.1.4. NO OTHER WARRANTIES. THE ABOVE LIMITED WARRANTIES ARE IN LIEU OF
ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AND REPRESENT THE FULL
AND TOTAL OBLIGATION AND/OR LIABILITY OF INTERGRAPH. THE LIMITED
WARRANTIES PROVIDE CUSTOMER WITH SPECIFIC LEGAL RIGHTS. CUSTOMER
MAY HAVE OTHER RIGHTS, WHICH VARY JURISDICTION TO JURISDICTION. IF A
GREATER WARRANTY IS MANDATED PURSUANT TO THE LAW HELD
APPLICABLE TO THIS AGREEMENT, THEN INTERGRAPH WARRANTS THE
SERVICES OR COVERED PRODUCTS TO THE MINIMUM EXTENT REQUIRED BY
SAID LAW.
16.2. Remedies. In the event a warranted Service, Covered Product, or Update provided
pursuant to this Agreement does not substantially comply with the limited warranties set forth
in the Agreement, Intergraph’s entire liability and Customer’s exclusive remedy shall be, in
Intergraph’s sole and absolute discretion, either (i) providing of a Service, Covered Product,
Page 9 of 14

26. or Update which conforms substantially with the warranty; or (ii) a refund of the purchase price
of the particular warranted Service, Covered Product, or Update for the period of time that the
warranted Service, Covered Product, or Update did not substantially conform to the limited
warranties set forth in this Agreement.
Intergraph is acting on behalf of its suppliers for the sole purpose of disclaiming, excluding
and/or limiting obligations and liability as provided in this Agreement, but in no other respects
and for no other purpose.
16.3. WARRANTY DISCLAIMERS. ANY WARRANTIES HEREUNDER ARE VOID IF
FAILURE OF A WARRANTED ITEM RESULTS DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, FROM AN
UNAUTHORIZED MODIFICATION OF A WARRANTED ITEM; AN UNAUTHORIZED
ATTEMPT TO REPAIR A WARRANTED ITEM; OR MISUSE OF A WARRANTED ITEM,
INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, USE OF WARRANTED ITEM UNDER ABNORMAL
OPERATING CONDITIONS OR WITHOUT ROUTINELY MAINTAINING A WARRANTED
ITEM. CUSTOMER SHALL PROMPTLY NOTIFY INTERGRAPH OF ANY SUSPECTED
DEFECTS IN COVERED PRODUCTS DELIVERY MEDIA. EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY
SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY
APPLICABLE LAW, INTERGRAPH AND ITS SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES,
EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, RELATING TO THE SERVICES, COVERED PRODUCTS,
AND UPDATES PROVIDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. INTERGRAPH DOES NOT
WARRANT THAT ANY SERVICES, COVERED PRODUCTS, AND UPDATES PROVIDED
PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT WILL MEET CUSTOMER’S REQUIREMENTS, AND
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES DOES INTERGRAPH WARRANT THAT ANY SERVICES,
COVERED PRODUCTS, AND UPDATES WILL OPERATE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR
FREE. IF ANY PART OF THIS DISCLAIMER OF EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES IS
RULED INVALID, THEN INTERGRAPH DISCLAIMS EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
WARRANTIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT ALLOWED BY APPLICABLE LAW.
17. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL
INTERGRAPH OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION,
DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF USE OR PRODUCTION, LOSS OF REVENUE OR PROFIT, LOSS OF
DATA, LOSS OF BUSINESS INFORMATION, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, CLAIMS OF THIRD
PARTIES OR ANY OTHER PECUNIARY LOSS ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT, EVEN IF
INTERGRAPH HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. INTERGRAPH’S
ENTIRE LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE
LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT ACTUALLY PAID BY CUSTOMER TO INTERGRAPH DURING THE
PAST TWELVE MONTHS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT AS OF THE DATE THE EVENT GIVING
RISE TO THE CLAIM OCCURS. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW, NO
CLAIM, REGARDLESS OF FORM, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS
AGREEMENT MAY BE BROUGHT BY CUSTOMER MORE THAN TWO (2) YEARS FOLLOWING
THE INITIAL EVENT GIVING RISE TO THE CAUSE OF ACTION. BECAUSE SOME
JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, THE ABOVE
LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO CUSTOMER. IF ANY PART OF THIS SECTION IS HELD
INVALID, THEN INTERGRAPH LIMITS ITS LIABILITY TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT ALLOWED BY
APPLICABLE LAW.
Page 10 of 14

27. 18. TERMINATION
This Agreement may only be terminated prior to its expiration in the following ways:
18.1. Either party petitions for reorganization under the Bankruptcy Act or is adjudicated as
bankrupt, or a receiver is appointed for the other party’s business.
18.2. Customer fails to pay Intergraph any amount when due (i) under this Agreement; or (ii)
under any other agreement between the parties.
18.3. Customer’s license to the Covered Products for which Customer has purchased
Services is terminated.
19. RESTRICTIONS
19.1. Non-Solicitation of Employees. Customer agrees that it will not, without the prior
written consent of Intergraph, solicit or hire any Intergraph employee, or induce such
employee to leave Intergraph’s employment, directly or indirectly, during the term of this
Agreement and for a period of twelve (12) months after the Agreement expires or is
terminated. Customer agrees that a breach of this provision would cause actual and
substantial damages to Intergraph such that it would be very difficult to calculate actual
damages. Accordingly, any such breach will entitle Intergraph to recover liquidated damages
from Customer in the amount equal to one (1) year of the affected employee’s annual salary
plus benefits for each such breach, as well as expenses, costs, and reasonable attorneys’
fees incurred by Intergraph in seeking enforcement of this Agreement. Customer agrees that
the foregoing amount is intended to be, and in fact is, a reasonable estimate of the actual
damages that would be incurred by Intergraph if Customer were to breach this provision, and
that this amount is not intended to be, and in fact is not, a penalty. In addition, Intergraph shall
be entitled to equitable or injunctive relief to prevent further breaches. For purposes of this
Section, the term “employee” means employees of Intergraph and/or any Intergraph
subsidiary and/or any of Intergraph’s subcontractors who directly support Customer.
19.2. United States Government Restricted Rights. If a Covered Product (including any
Updates, documentation or technical data related to such Covered Products) is licensed,
purchased, subscribed to or obtained, directly or indirectly, by or on behalf of a unit or agency
of the United States Government, then this Section also applies.
19.2.1. For civilian agencies: The Covered Product was developed at private expense and is
“restricted computer software” submitted with restricted rights in accordance with the
Federal Acquisition Regulations (“FAR”) 52.227-19 (a) through (d) (Commercial
Computer Software – Restricted Rights).
19.2.2. For units of the Department of Defense (“DoD”): The Covered Product was developed
at private expense and is “commercial computer software” submitted with restricted
rights in accordance with the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations (“DFARS”)
DFARS 227.7202-3 (Rights in commercial computer software or commercial computer
software documentation).
19.2.3. Notice: The Covered Product is “commercial computer software” as defined in DFARS
252.227-7014 (Rights in Noncommercial Computer Software) and FAR 12.212
(Computer Software), which includes “technical data” as defined in DFARS
252.227-7015 (Technical Data) and FAR 12.211 (Technical Data). All use, modification,
reproduction, release, performance, display or disclosure of this “commercial computer
software” shall be in strict accordance with the manufacturer’s standard commercial
license, which is attached to and incorporated into the governing Government contract.
Page 11 of 14

28. Intergraph and any applicable Third Party Software manufacturers are the
manufacturers. This Covered Product is unpublished and all rights are reserved under
the Copyright Laws of the United States.
19.3. Export Restrictions. All Software Products and all Third Party Software (including any
Updates, documentation or technical data related to such software products) licensed,
purchased, subscribed to or obtained, directly or indirectly, from Intergraph, its subsidiaries or
distributors (collectively, “Export Controlled Products”) are subject to the export control laws
and regulations of the United States. Diversion contrary to United States law is prohibited.
The Export Controlled Products, and the direct product thereof, shall not be exported or
re-exported, directly or indirectly (including via remote access), under the following
circumstances:
19.3.1. To Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, or Syria, or any national of these countries.
19.3.2. To any person or entity listed on any United States government denial list, including
but not limited to, the United States Department of Commerce Denied Persons, Entities,
and Unverified Lists (www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforcement/liststocheck.htm),
the U.S. Department of Treasury Specially Designated Nationals List
(www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/), and the U.S. Department of State Debarred
List (http://www.pmddtc.state.gov/compliance/debar.html).
19.3.3. To any entity if Customer knows, or has reason to know, the end use of the Export
Controlled Product is related to the design, development, production, or use of missiles,
chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons, or other unsafeguarded or sensitive nuclear
uses.
19.3.4. To any entity if Customer knows, or has reason to know, that an illegal reshipment will
take place.
Any questions regarding export or re-export of an Export Controlled Product should be
addressed to Intergraph Corporation’s Export Compliance Department, 19 Interpro Road,
Madison, Alabama, United States 35758 or at exportcompliance@intergraph.com.
20. TAXES
All charges under this Agreement are exclusive of each and every country’s federal, provincial, state,
municipal, or other governmental, withholding, excise, sales, use, value added or other taxes, tariffs,
custom duties and importing fees (“Taxes”). Customer shall be liable for, and shall indemnify and hold
Intergraph harmless from and against, any and all Taxes. Taxes shall expressly exclude any federal,
state, municipal, or other governmental income taxes, franchise taxes, business license fees and other
like taxes measured by Intergraph’s income, capital and/or assets. The total invoice amount for
charges under this Agreement is subject to increase by the amount of any Taxes which Intergraph is
required to withhold, collect, or pay regarding the transactions under this Agreement so that Intergraph
receives the full amount of the charges on Intergraph’s invoices. Any certificate to exempt the
Agreement from tax liability or other documentary evidence of statutory exemption shall be obtained
by Customer at Customer’s expense.
21. GENERAL
21.1. Third Party Providers. Intergraph reserves the right to provide Services through a third
party provider.
21.2. Entire Agreement. The Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
relating to the subject matter hereof. The Agreement supersedes any and all prior
Page 12 of 14

29. discussions and/or representations, whether written or oral, relating to the subject matter
of the Agreement and no reference to prior dealings may be used to in any way modify the
expressed understandings of the Agreement. Intergraph does not accept any
contradictory or additional terms and conditions, even by accepting a purchase order
referencing different terms and conditions. The Agreement may be amended only by a
written instrument signed by authorized representatives of both parties, and cannot be
amended by subsequent purchase order or writing received from Customer without the
express written consent of Intergraph. Any reproduction of the Agreement made by
reliable means (for example, photocopy or facsimile) will be deemed an original.
21.3. Order of Precedence. In the event of a conflict between the documents that form the
Agreement, the order of precedence will be as follows: (i) any addenda executed by
Intergraph and Customer, with the latest addendum taking precedence over any earlier
addenda; (ii) the Quote; and (iii) these Terms and Conditions.
21.4. Severability. Whenever possible, each provision of the Agreement shall be interpreted in
such a manner as to be effective and valid under the applicable law. However, if any
provision of the Agreement shall be prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such
provision shall be ineffective only to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity without
invalidating the remainder of such provision or the remaining provisions of the Agreement.
21.5. Headings. The various headings in these Terms and Conditions are inserted for
convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of these Terms and
Conditions or any section or provision of these Terms and Conditions.
21.6. No Waiver. Any failure by either party to enforce performance of the Agreement shall not
constitute a waiver of, or affect said party’s right to avail itself of, such remedies as it may
have for any subsequent breach of the terms of the Agreement.
21.7 Notices. Any notice or other communication (“Notice”) required or permitted under the
Agreement shall be in writing and either delivered personally or sent by overnight delivery,
express mail, or certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. A
Notice delivered personally shall be deemed given only if acknowledged in writing by the
person to whom it is given. A Notice sent by overnight delivery or express mail shall be
deemed given twenty-four (24) hours after having been sent. A Notice that is sent by
certified mail or registered mail shall be deemed given forty-eight (48) hours after it is
mailed. If any time period in this Agreement commences upon the delivery of Notice to any
one or more parties, the time period shall commence only when all of the required Notices
have been deemed given. Intergraph’s address for Notices is Intergraph Corporation, 19
Interpro Road, Madison, Alabama 35758, Attn: SG&I Contracts, M/S IW17A1.
21.8 Assignment. Neither party shall have the right to assign any of its rights nor delegate any
of its obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party,
except that Intergraph may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement, without
Customer’s approval, to (i) an entity which acquires all or substantially all of the assets of
Intergraph or the Intergraph division providing a product or service under this Agreement;
(ii) an entity which acquires all or substantially all of the Software Products or product line
assets subject to this Agreement; or (iii) any subsidiary, affiliate or successor in a merger
or acquisition of Intergraph. Any attempt by Customer to sublicense, assign or transfer any
of Customer’s rights or obligations under this Agreement, except as expressly provided in
this Agreement, is void.
21.9 Force Majeure. Except for payment obligations under the Agreement, neither party shall
be liable for any failure to perform or observe any of its obligations under this Agreement
Page 13 of 14

30. for as long as and to the extent that such performance is prevented or hindered by any
circumstances beyond its reasonable control. By way of example, and not limitation, such
causes may include acts of God or public enemies; labor disputes; acts of local, state, or
national governments or public agencies; utility or communications failure; fire; flood;
epidemics; riots; or strikes. The time for performance of any right or obligation delayed by
such events will be postponed for a period equal to the delay. If, however, a party is
subject to a force majeure that endures for more than sixty (60) calendar days, the other
party has a right to terminate the Agreement upon providing thirty (30) calendar days prior
written notice to the party subject to the force majeure.
21.10 Governing Law. This Agreement shall for all purposes be construed and enforced under
and in accordance with the laws of the State of Alabama and shall be deemed to have
been accepted in Madison, Alabama, United States. The parties agree that any legal
action or proceeding relating to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Circuit Court for
Madison County, Alabama, or the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Alabama, Northeastern Division. The parties agree to submit to the jurisdiction of and
agree that venue is proper in these courts in any such legal action or proceedings. This
Agreement shall not be governed by the conflict of law rules of any jurisdiction or the
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, the
application of which is expressly excluded.
21.11 Waiver of Jury Trial. Intergraph and Customer each hereby waive, to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law, any right either may have to a trial by jury for any legal
proceeding arising, directly or indirectly, out of or relating to this Agreement.
21.12 Injunctive Relief; Cumulative Remedies. Customer acknowledges and agrees that a
breach of the Agreement by Customer could cause irreparable harm to Intergraph for
which monetary damages may be difficult to ascertain or may be an inadequate remedy.
Customer agrees that Intergraph will have the right, in addition to its other rights and
remedies, to seek and obtain injunctive relief for any breach of the Agreement by
Customer, and Customer expressly waives any objection that Intergraph has or may have
an adequate remedy at law with respect to any such breach. The rights and remedies set
forth in this Agreement are cumulative and concurrent and may be pursued separately,
successively or together.
21.13 Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. In the event of any legal proceeding arising out of or relating to
this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to an award of its
reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for all such legal proceedings, including for trial and
all levels of appeal.
21.14 Governing Language. The controlling language of this Agreement is English. If Customer
has received a translation into another language, it has been provided for Customer’s
convenience only.
21.15 Survival. The provisions of the Agreement which require or contemplate performance
after the expiration or termination of the Agreement shall be enforceable notwithstanding
said expiration or termination.
SGI-092410b
Page 14 of 14

47. Exhibit A Security, Government and Infrastructure
San Angelo TX City Of PO#: TBD
Account Nbr: MDC-2222 Performance Period: 01/01/2013 Through 12/31/2013
Quote: 1-6W7B3F- City of San Angelo TX - SW 2013 Service Level: Premium
Bill To: Ship To:
San Angelo TX City Of San Angelo TX City Of
Attn: Accounts Payable Attn: Sgt. Victor Vasquez
401 East Beauregard Avenue 401 East Beauregard Avenue
San Angelo, TX 76903 San Angelo, TX 76903
USA USA
Ln Base Part Description Serial Begin End Coverage Mths Qty Mth Total
Cost Cost
Site Number: 00085719
2 IPS0001 I/Executive MME-1-ZBH7 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $689.00 $8,268.00
3 IPS0002 I/Dispatcher MME-1-1K3WS 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 9 $295.00 $31,860.00
4 IPS0004 I/Informer MME-1-ZBHR 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $394.00 $4,728.00
5 IPS0004A I/Informer to I/LEADS MME-1-ZBHT 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $0.00 $0.00
6 IPS0007 I/Executive 2 MME-1-ZBHV 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $491.00 $5,892.00
7 IPS0009 I/Mobile Data Terminal MME-1-ZBHX 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $788.00 $9,456.00
8 IPS0015 I/Tracker 1-233977243 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $446.00 $5,352.00
9 IPS0019 I/LEADS-Server MME-1-ZBIB 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $375.00 $4,500.00
10 IPS0020 I/LEADS-Records Management System - MME-1-1K585 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 60 $28.00 $20,160.00
11 IPS0022 I/LEADS-Incident Based Reporting MME-1-ZBLP 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $171.00 $2,052.00
12 IPS0030 I/LEADS-CAD Link MME-1-ZBLT 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $0.00 $0.00
13 IPS0038 I/Mobile MME-1-ZBN1 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 112 $20.00 $26,880.00
14 IPS0042A I/NetViewer - 15 users MME-1-ZBT9 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $446.00 $5,352.00
15 IPS0052 I/Fire Station Alerting 1-16070760 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $180.00 $2,160.00
16 IPS1163C I/MapEditor CC - Component 145Z2D700120184 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $75.00 $900.00
17 SFRMSCAD FireRMS CAD Interface 1-213629321 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $399.99 $4,799.88
18 SJBX690AA-C GeoMedia Pro - CC - English - 145Z2D700120184 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 1 $176.00 $2,112.00
19 SUNPRORMSENT SUNPRO Fire RMS Enterprise Edition 1-213826625 01/01/2013 12/31/2013 Ph Supp with Upg's 12 8 $60.00 $5,760.00
SubTotal for Site Number 00085719 $140,231.88
Report Generated for kmichels on 11/1/2012 Page 1 of 2

48. Exhibit A Security, Government and Infrastructure
San Angelo TX City Of PO#: TBD
Account Nbr: MDC-2222 Performance Period: 01/01/2013 Through 12/31/2013
Quote: 1-6W7B3F- City of San Angelo TX - SW 2013 Service Level: Premium
Ln Base Part Description Serial Begin End Coverage Mths Qty Mth Total
Cost Cost
Grand Total Excluding Tax $140,231.88
Report Generated for kmichels on 11/1/2012 Page 2 of 2

49. City of San Angelo
Memo
DATE: November 13, 2012
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Robert Salas, Director, Neighborhood Services
SUBJECT: Agenda Item for Dec 4, 2012 Council Meeting
CONTACT: Robert Salas 657-4274
CAPTION: Consent
Consideration of approving an amendment to the Neighborhood Stabilization Program
(NSP) contract between the City and the Texas Department of Housing and Community
Affairs (TDHCA) and authorizing the City Manager to execute related documents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary: Request approval of an amendment to the city’s NSP contract with TDHCA to extend the
expiration date from August 31, 2012 to Mar 1, 2013. This extension will allow the completion of the NSP
projects and allow for the city to receive reimbursement from the state.
History: On Dec 1, 2009 Council accepted the NSP grant funds in the amount of $525K to purchase,
rehabilitate, and resell foreclosed homes to low income citizens in Tom Green County and authorized the
City Manager to execute the contract. The current contract expired Aug 31, 2012. Galilee CDC and
Rebuilding Together, original partners with Galilee, contracted to build 3 units and Rebuilding Together
contracted to build 2 units. Rebuilding Together has since closed down leaving Galilee as the remaining
partner. Consequently, the extension modifies the NSP amount to $317,648.00.
Financial Impact: Contract reduces the total amount from $525,000.00 to $317,648.00.
Related Vision Item: Neighborhood Revitalization.
Other Information/Recommendations: Staff requests approval of contract amendment
Attachments: Contract Amendment
Presentation: None
Publication: None
Reviewed by Department Director: N/A

57. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: November 21, 2012
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Shawn Lewis, Director of Community & Economic Development
Subject: Agenda Item for December 4, 2012 Council Meeting
Contact: Shawn Lewis, or Bob Schneeman 657-4210
Caption: Regular Agenda Item
Consideration of adopting a revised resolution authorizing the filing of
applications with the Texas Department of Transportation for federal
transportation assistance in the amount of $1,300,354 million with a 20%
matching fund requirement of up to $260,071 over a five year period under the
Transportation Enhancement Grant program, authorized by Title 43, Part 1,
Chapter 11, Subchapter E of the Texas Administrative Code, and other state
and federal statutes administered by the Texas Department of Transportation
Summary: At its regular meeting of November 6, City Council approved a resolution
authorizing City staff to apply for a $1.1 million grant to the Texas Department of
Transportation for bicycle and pedestrian improvements, with a 20% match of
$235,000. Upon submitting the grant on November 16, staff learned that the local
community is required to provide the same 20% match for a 15% TxDOT
administrative fee that is on top of the construction costs submitted for the project.
As a result, the City is being asked to increase our local match by $25,071 in
order to match the $169,611 administrative fee TxDOT has added to the project.
History: San Angelo has benefitted from a number of Transportation Enhancement grants
from TxDOT through the years. Projects such as the restoration of the historic
Depot, the San Angelo Visitor Center, Paseo and Old Town Streetscape project,
and most recently the Red Arroyo Trails project are all projects made possible by
TxDOT Transportation Enhancement grants.
The TIRZ Board has endorsed funding to apply for a Transportation
Enhancement grant. Three of the seven eligible activities under this grant include
the following “enhancements” to existing transportation systems:
1. Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles
2. Provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrians and
bicyclists
3. Landscaping and other scenic beautification
City Staff has identified the following projects as priorities in order to enhance
existing transportation systems:
• Implementation of the 2005 Bicycle-Pedestrian Plan calling for bike lanes
and trails throughout the City, but not been funded with the exception of
two other TxDOT projects—Red Arroyo Trail and the Lone Wolf
Adopted: 5/30/03
Revised: 6/21/10

58. Pedestrian Bridge (funded by stimulus dollars)
• Implementation of the 2011 Streetscape Masterplan which calls for trees,
lighting, sidewalk construction/repair, ADA ramps, pedestrian amenities
(trashcans & benches) throughout the South TIRZ (downtown) and in the
North TIRZ along corridors leading to the Coliseum and Fair Grounds.
The proposed grant includes the following:
1. Bicycle lanes connecting schools and significant activity generators
(Walmart North, downtown, Angelo State University, several
elementary schools, etc.)
2. 15 large bicycle racks at significant sites along proposed bike lanes
3. Street trees and pedestrian amenities in the downtown area and
cultural district south of the river
4. Street trees along Chadbourne and MLK between Houston Harte and
th
29 Street as well as a new sidewalk along the west side of MLK
Boulevard.
City staff proposed the following cost sharing for the matching grant under the
original $235,000 funding resolution Council adopted November 6:
• North TIRZ--$60,000
• South TIRZ--$60,000
• Downtown San Angelo—$25,000 guaranteed (grant from a national
foundation already awarded, but not official until January), more funds
from other sources to be determined
• San Angelo Road Lizards—to be determined
• San Angelo Health Foundation—to be determined
City staff proposes the following cost sharing as a result of the $25,071
increase in required matching funds:
• $6,000 refund to the North and South TIRZ from The Goodman
Corporation (our grant writing consultant) as a result of problems with
this grant submission
• $7,500 refund of a façade grant from South TIRZ to COSADC for
façade renovations to the Business Resource Center
• An additional $7,500 from North TIRZ
• $4,071 to be determined
Financial Impact: Grant match: $260,071 over five years (20% local match on $1.3 million grant)
Related Vision Item
(if applicable):
Other Information/ Staff recommends approval as presented
Recommendation:
Attachments: Overview of proposed project: Cost Estimate & Map
Proposed revised resolution authorizing grant application and related matching
funds
Presentation: Shawn Lewis, Director of Community & Economic Development & Clinton Bailey,
City Engineer
Publication:
Reviewed by Shawn Lewis, ext 1541
Director:
Approved by Legal:

59. h St
Wal-Mart
E 29t
Grap d
e Cr
R
7
y6
ee k
wa
Bradford
Armstrong St
igh
Elementary
St
SH
School
th
29
NU
W Chicken Farm Arts Center
NC
N Bell St
had
Holiman
To State Park
Walgreens
p
Elementary
bo
67 m
N 6
ay Ra
urn
Br School
30
ya
nt op
e
Lo
St
Blv th St E 19th E 19th St N
19
d amp ghw
d N
Br E St
ya
6 7 R S Hi
nt
Blv
U
E 14th St
N
d
Athletic Courts & Pavilion
N Loop 306 Frontage R
Reagan
N US Highway
Safety City
Elementary
Lowes Grocery Store School
d
Blv
und
Edm
Skate Park MLK Park
Fannin
Elementary
School
306
N Lo amp
rte Expy
ston Ha
Hou E Houston Harte Expy
op 30 6
R
E
N Loo
St
Ramp
9th
p
W 1
N Loop 306
Wesley UMC Soup Kitchen
Guadalupe
FM 38
School 0
San Jacinto
Elementary St
Pulliam
N Loop N Loop 306
Cornerstone School
N Loo p 306
Christian St
th Carver
School 14
W Campus Central
306 Ramp
Freshman
t
Campus
S
Ramp
nna
N Bell St
Gle
NC
Multi-Modal
had
St
b
ius
our
Jun
n
e St
Sacred
Heart
Wa St
Central
School rd Ave
rega
High
shi
N ton
au
E Be
Alta Loma
ng
Clarion Hotel
School
NJ
Elementary
ack
School
son
Austin Convention Center
Elementary
St
School Ambleside
NW
School
xpy e
d Av
as h
te E egar
r aur
ing
Ha e
on WB
ton
ust
Ho
St
W
xpy
eE
art
NJ
onH
ack
ust
Ho
son
W Rio Concho Sports Complex
St
Rio
S Lo
Muni-Pool
Con
ch
op 3
SW
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts
oD
r
as h
06
ing
S Lo
Visitor Center Train Depot
ton
Fort Concho
op 3
Glenna St
Elementary
St
Mercedes Ave School
06
SJ
ack
W Washington Dr E Washington Dr
son
El Paseo
Lee Middle Santa Rita
St
School Elementary
School
McGill ve
dA
gar
Elementary Belaire
re Elementary
S Bell St
School au
S Jackson St
Be School
W
Ard y
Wa
S Lo S Loop p
en R
d d
oo
Lone Wolf Ped Bridge
op
306
rw
r
e
na D
Sh
306
Ram
Glen
Ram
eL W Avenue L E Avenue L
nu Sam
Ave
p
Houston
W Campus
W Avenue N FM
E Avenue N 388
Saint
Christova
e Marys
Av
rd School
ga Rd
306 R 306 R
re Paint Rock
S Loo p S Lo p
au
l Rd
Be
Glenmore
am
W Elementary
p
School
Crockett
Elementary
am
op
Goodfellow
School Air Force Base
S Bryant Blvd S Bryant Blvd
S Johnson St
S College
Glenn Junior
High School
SC
Hills
Rio Vista
Rd
ha
l Rd
Campus
er
PAYS
db
Foster St
ck
Blvd
ou
School
bo
ova
er
rne
ick
Christ
Kn
St
Bowie
SJ
ac
Elementary nS
ks
School t
o
Sunset
Ct
Suns
et D
r
WL
oop
30 6 W Lo
op 3
06
³
Proposed Areas for Irrigated Trees, Benches and Trash Receptacles Schools
Proposed areas for irrigated trees Major Properties
Proposed Bike Trails/Lanes City Owned Property Texas Transportation
Proposed Sidewalks Parks
Enhancement Grant Proposal
Existing Streetscape, Constructed 2011 Goodfellow A.F.B. GIS Division 1 inch = 900 feet
Streetscape to be Constructed January 2013 (funded) Central Business District Document Path: K:downtownstreetscapeworkarea2012 Transporation Enhancement Grant - Overall Section.mxd

60. Transportation Enhancement Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements
Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
City of San Angelo Community and Economic Development Department
October 26, 2012
Block Faces in downtown 44
Description Unit Price Total Amount
Unit Quantity Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
Downtown improvements including irrigated trees,
Block Side 125 $ 6,536.80 $ 817,100.00 Tree ea 500 300 150000
benches and trash receptacles
Concrete Sidewalk West Side Martin Luther King Drive
from West 29th St to West 11th Street (5 feet wide with SF 34,500 $ 8.50 $ 293,250.00
curb ramps) Tree well ea 500 1200
Bike Lane Striping (4" White Thermoplastic) LF 97,858 $ 0.60 $ 58,714.80 Irrigation system block face 125 3500 437500
Bike Lane Signage (Sign and Sign Pole) EA 60 $ 110.00 $ 6,600.00 Bench ea 88 1500 132000
Total $ 1,175,664.80 Trash Can ea 68 700 47600
Bike Racks ea 50 1000 50000
817100
6536.8

61. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF APPLICATIONS WITH
THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR FEDERAL
TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,300,354.00
WITH A 20% MATCHING FUND REQUIREMENT OF UP TO $260,071.00
OVER A FIVE YEAR PERIOD UNDER THE TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM, AUTHORIZED BY TITLE 43,
PART 1, CHAPTER 11, SUBCHAPTER E OF THE TEXAS
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, AND OTHER STATE AND FEDERAL
STATUTES ADMINISTERED BY THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION.
WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo, Texas, (City) is a Home- Rule Municipality
organized pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Section 5.004 of the
Texas Local Government Code;
WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of San Angelo hereby finds it is in the best
interest of the City, and a public health and welfare purpose is served, to pursue additional
federal funds for transportation projects in the City;
WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) has been delegated
authority to award federal financial assistance for transportation projects;
WHEREAS, TxDOT issued a call for nominations in September 2012, for communities
to apply for federal highway funding assistance made available through the Transportation
Enhancement Program;
WHEREAS, the San Angelo Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan (Project)
provides for the enhancement of pedestrian-transit infrastructure within the City of San Angelo,
including added bike lanes, sidewalks and downtown pedestrian amenities; and, the City
proposes to submit a nomination requesting federal funding for assistance in the amount of
$1,040,283.00; and
WHEREAS, the funding or cooperative agreement for federal financial assistance will
impose certain obligations upon the City, and may require the City to provide the minimum
match of 20% local share in form of cash for the Project costs in the following amounts:
San Angelo Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan = 20% matching
funds up to $260,071.00, plus 100% of any overruns above the total projected
Project cost of $1,300,354.00.
WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo supports funding these projects as shown in the
Nomination Budget and commits to the Project’s development, implementation, construction,
maintenance, management, and financing;

62. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SAN ANGELO CITY COUNCIL,
THAT:
Section 1: The City Manager is authorized to execute and file an application for federal
assistance on behalf of the City of San Angelo with the Texas Department of Transportation
under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, Title 23, United States Code, or other federal statutes authorizing
such projects administered by TxDOT.
Section 2. The City Manager is authorized to execute and file with the application for
federal assistance the annual certifications, assurances and other documents that TxDOT requires
before awarding a federal assistance grant or cooperative agreement.
Section 3. The City Manager is authorized to negotiate and execute a grant and
cooperative agreements with the Texas Department of Transportation on behalf of the City for
federal assistance to fund the Project, in which the City is to provide matching funds of twenty
percent (20%) up to $260,071.00, on a projected total Project cost of $1,300,354.00.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of December, 2012.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________ ________________________________
Shawn Lewis Lysia H. Bowling
Community & Economic Development City Attorney
Director

63. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: November 27, 2012
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Ricky Dickson, Interim Water Utilities Director
Subject: Consent Item for December 4, 2012 Council Meeting
Contact: Ricky Dickson, Interim Water Utilities Director, 657-4209
Caption: Consideration of approving a residential lease renewal with Wade and Wendy
Honaker, at Lot 37, Group Fishermans Road, 2610 Sleepy Hollow Road; and authorizing the Interim
Water Utilities Director to execute the same.
Summary: The leaseholder’s current lease expires in 2048 and they would like to execute a new 40
year lease for financing purposes.
History: Lease fees are current and there are no issues with the lease on this tract.
Financial Impact: Current lease fees: 2013-2018 $607.00
2019-2028 $728.00
2029-2034 $874.00
2035-2048 Market Value
New lease fees: 2013-2018 $643.00
2019-2028 $772.00
2029-2034 $926.00
2035-2051 Market Value
Related Vision Item (if applicable): None.
Other Information/Recommendation: It is recommended that the lease renewal be approved
and the Interim Water Utilities Director be authorized to execute the lease. Staff recommends
approval.
Attachments: Lease Renewal Agreement (Wade & Wendy Honaker)
Presentation: None.
Publication: None.
Reviewed by Interim Assistant Director: Kevin Krueger, November 27, 2012

64. LAKE NASWORTHY RESIDENTIAL LOT LEASE
This lease is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF SAN ANGELO, a
Texas municipal corporation, ("Lessor"), whose address is 72 W. College Avenue, San Angelo,
Tom Green County, Texas 76903, and Wade and Wendy Honaker whose address is 2610 Sleepy
Hollow Road, San Angelo, Texas 76904 ("Lessee").
I. DEMISE OF LEASED PREMISES
1.1 In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and agreements set forth in this
lease, Lessor hereby demises and leases to Lessee, and Lessee hereby accepts and leases from
Lessor, the following described real property (hereinafter called "leased premises") situated in
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas:
Lot 37, Group Fishermans Road, Lake Nasworthy Addition,
according to the map or plat of said Lake Nasworthy Campsites in
the custody of the Water Utilities Department of the City of San
Angelo (also commonly known as 2610 Sleepy Hollow Road.)
II. TERM, FEES AND RENT
FIXED COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION DATE
2.1 This lease is granted for a period of forty (40) years having an effective date beginning
December 1, 2012 and ending November 30, 2052, in consideration of the initial payment of
$150.00, which payment includes the granting fee, receipt of which payment is hereby
acknowledged, and the further consideration of Lessee's payment of future annual rent in
accordance with subsequent paragraphs hereof and Lessee's compliance with the stipulations and
conditions hereinafter set forth.
TIME AND MANNER OF PAYMENT
2.2 Lessee shall pay annual rent to Lessor at the San Angelo Water Utilities Department, 72
W. College, San Angelo, Texas, 76903, or at such other place as Lessor may from time to time
designate by written notice to Lessee. Such rent shall be paid annually on or before July 1 during
the term of this lease in accordance with the following schedule:
Dates Annual Rent
For the Years 2013 Through 2018 $643.00
For the Years 2019 Through 2028 $772.00
For the Years 2029 Through 2034 $926.00
For the Years 2035 Through 2051 *Market Value
1

65. * Annual rent shall be the appraised market value of the leased premises multiplied by a factor of
0.08. Such appraised market value shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with
applicable City ordinances in effect at the time of execution of this lease.
DELINQUENT PAYMENTS
2.3 Lessee shall pay to Lessor a late charge or interest for any rent received by Lessor after
the date that the rent is due in accordance with established ordinances, provided however, that
this provision for late charges or interest shall not be construed as a waiver of the right of Lessor
to terminate this lease at its option as authorized herein.
HOLD OVER
2.4 Any holding over by Lessee of the herein leased premises after the expiration of this
lease shall operate and be construed only as a tenancy from month to month, terminable at the
will of Lessor.
III. DEBTS RELATED TO LEASED PREMISES
UTILITIES
3.1 Any utility charges shall be paid in full by Lessee when due. Failure to pay such
charges may be deemed a default at the option of Lessor.
TAXES
3.2 It is further understood and agreed that Lessee shall pay and discharge all taxes, general
and special assessments, and other charges of every description which during the term of this
lease may be levied on or assessed against the leased premises and all interest therein and all
improvements and other property thereon, whether belonging to Lessor or Leaser to which either
of them may become liable. Lessee shall pay all such taxes, charges, and assessments to the
public officer charged with the collection thereof not less than fifteen (15) days before the same
shall become delinquent, and Lessee agrees to indemnify and save harmless Lessor from all such
taxes, charges and assessments. Failure to pay such taxes and special assessments as provided
herein may be deemed a default at the option of Lessor.
WATER, SEWAGE, PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
3.3 In the event the Lessor lays sewer and/or water lines on, adjacent to or in the vicinity of
the leased premises, Lessee agrees to pay the pro rata front-foot cost of laying said line or lines
as established by and in accordance with city policies then in existence.
2

66. 3.4 Lessee expressly agrees that if city water or sewer lines are ever located within 200 feet
of the leased premises, Lessee will tie on to such service at its own expense at the price
established for that specific Lake Nasworthy area.
3.5 In the event the Lessor institutes a paving program abutting the leased premises, Lessee
shall pay his pro rata share of paving, curb and gutter costs pursuant to prevailing city policies.
IV. RULES AND REGULATIONS
4.1 The rules and regulations provided in those certain ordinances of the City Council of the
City of San Angelo, ("Council"), adopted April 2, 1951, and now known as the Lake
Nasworthy-Twin Buttes Ordinances and any and all subsequent amendments adopted heretofore
or hereafter are expressly incorporated herein by reference as terms and conditions of this lease.
This lease is expressly made subject to any ordinances adopted in the future by the Council for
the regulation of Lake Nasworthy and surrounding property, including but not limited to, safety,
sanitation, and ecological requirements. This lease will be managed by the Water Utilities
Department of the City of San Angelo subject to the approval of the Council.
V. USE OF LEASED PREMISES
CONSTRUCTION BY LESSEE
5.1 The premises shall be used only for a single family residence and lawful uses incidental
thereto, and in this connection the following shall be applicable:
a. No structure shall be constructed in excess of two stories in height.
b. No dwelling or residence shall be located nearer than 75 feet to the 1,872.2 foot
elevation line.
c. No housetrailer, shack, tent, or temporary residence of any type shall be permitted on
the leased premises, and no garage or other accessory building shall be used as a
residence.
d. All structures shall have a foundation that complies with Lessor's building code.
e. No outside toilets shall be constructed or maintained on leased premises, and all
plumbing shall be connected with a sanitary sewer or with a septic tank which complies
in all respects to all state, county and city sanitation regulations and requirements. No
septic tank shall be placed, constructed, or maintained nearer than 75 feet to the 1,872.2
foot elevation line nor nearer than five (5) feet to any property line. All wastewater
facilities shall conform to all of the City's wastewater ordinances, where applicable. No
sewer or drain shall empty into the lake or be constructed so as to flow or wash into the
lake. No concrete storm drains may be constructed without the prior approval of the
Water Utilities Department, Zoning Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and/or
Council, as applicable.
3

67. f. No structure shall be constructed closer than five (5) feet to any property line.
g. No trees may be removed from the leased premises without the prior written consent of
the Water Utilities Director.
h. No improvements or construction work of any kind, including but not limited to,
houses, boathouses, piers, pump houses, water wells, storage buildings, fences,
excavations, fills, and other types of structures or improvements, shall be built or
performed on leased premises without prior approval of the Water Utilities Department,
Zoning Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and/or Council, as applicable.
i. Lessee agrees to comply with all provisions of the Official Code of the City of San
Angelo ("Code"), as such now exists or may hereafter be amended including, but not
limited to, those provisions regarding building permits and permit fees; inspections and
fees therefore; building, plumbing, electrical, and fire standards or requirements; and the
regulation of septic tanks.
j. After any permit is granted, Lessee expressly agrees that all improvements or
construction work shall be built or performed in strict compliance with the terms of the
permit and approval granted, that construction shall commence within six (6) months
following the date of the permit, and that all construction shall be completed within one
(1) year of the date of the permit.
k. Lessee may request from the Council a variance or deviation from any term or
condition contained herein.
l. The Council, prior to granting any extension of an existing lease or a new lease
covering the leased premises shall have the right to review the leased premises and
improvements thereon and submit in writing to the Lessee the requirements, if any, which
shall attach to and become a part of this lease, necessary for compliance with the
above-mentioned provisions of the Code. Failure of the Lessee to abide by and comply
with said requirements may be deemd a default at the option of Lessor.
RESERVATIONS AND EASEMENTS
5.2 Lessor, its agents or assigns, reserves the privilege and right at any time to execute and
deliver valid oil, gas and other mineral leases upon the leased premises, and valid right-of-way
easements for gas, oil, water, or wastewater pipelines, telephone, telegraph or electric pole
transmission lines on said premises, or any part thereof, and in such event this lease shall be
subject and subordinate to the rights, terms and privileges of any such oil, gas and other mineral
leases or such easements as may have been executed heretofore or hereafter by Lessor, its agents
or assigns. An easement across leased premises is hereby retained by Lessor for the purpose of
laying sewer and water lines and/or for necessary rights-of-way for roads, alleys or other
throughways.
4

68. VI. ENCUMBRANCE OF LEASEHOLD ESTATE
ENCUMBERING LEASEHOLD INTEREST ONLY
6.1 Lessee shall not have the right to encumber the fee simple, but Lessee may request
Lessor's written consent (pursuant to article XII of this lease) to encumber the leasehold estate,
personal property or improvements made by Lessee which may be removed from the realty
without injury to the realty; provided however, that no mortgagee nor anyone who claims by,
through or under such mortgage or deed of trust shall, by virtue of such mortgage or deed trust,
acquire any greater or more extended rights than Lessee has under this lease but such mortgage
or deed of trust shall be in every respect subject, subservient and subordinate to all of the
conditions, provisions, requirements, covenants and obligations of this lease. The mortgagee
under any such deed of trust or mortgage shall have the right to assume this lease and perform its
terms and conditions to protect itself.
NOTICES TO LENDER
6.2 Any lender or mortgagee may notify Lessor in writing that a mortgage or deed of trust
has been given and executed by Lessee and furnish Lessor with the address to which it desires
copies of notices to be mailed. Lessor agrees to mail to lender or mortgagee or its designated
agent or representative, at the address given, a copy of any notice which Lessor gives, mails, or
serves on Lessee under the terms of this lease after receipt of such a notice from the lender or
mortgagee.
VII. CONDITION OF PREMISES
NO WARRANTY
7.1 LESSOR GIVES NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE
CONDITION OF THE LEASED PREMISES OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS THEREON,
INCLUDING WARRANTY OF HABITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE.
AVAILABILITY AND USE OF LAKE WATER
7.2 Lessor in no way guarantees the accessibility of water to the leased premises nor the level
of water in Lake Nasworthy.
Lessee can use water from the lake, river, and/or wells on the premises for domestic
purposes and water of existing trees and shrubs; but no water will be removed from the premises.
Use of water for irrigation is expressly prohibited. Lessee shall use water in a conservative
manner, and any abusive use of water shall be grounds for denying the use of water to the
Lessee. Lessee shall pay the applicable water use charge as set by the Lessor, for water or raw
water usage, as the case may be.
VIII. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE
5

69. LESSEE'S DUTY TO REPAIR AND MAINTAIN
8.1 Lessee agrees to keep and maintain any and all structures erected or caused to be erected
or placed on the leased premises in good and tenantable condition, to maintain its appearance,
and to landscape and keep said premises cleared of all objectionable matter, things, and
vegetation. Leased premises shall not be used for the outside storage of usable materials for
unreasonable lengths of time. In the event Lessee shall fail to maintain leased premises in a
manner acceptable to Lessor, after notice to Lessee as prescribed by city ordinance, the Lessor
shall cause leased premises to be cleaned, cleared, and mowed. Lessee expressly authorizes the
cost of any such clearing, cleaning, and mowing to be billed to it or added to the next annual
rental payment, with interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum beginning thirty (30)
days from the date on which the work was completed, and continuing until such cost is paid in
full.
DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION
8.2 The parties hereto acknowledge that the leased premises are within an area subject to
overflow and flooding and it is expressly agreed between the parties that neither Lessor nor any
of its agents or employees shall be liable to Lessee for any damages caused in any manner,
negligent or otherwise, by high water or floods at Lake Nasworthy, nor by the rivers or creeks
which serve as its sources of supply or diversion channels, nor by reason of any work deemed
necessary in Lessor's sole judgment in the maintenance of said Lake and sources of supply or
diversion channels and all damages occasioned thereby are hereby waived, and when Lessor (or
any agent thereof) deems it necessary to enter on the leased premises for any of the above
purposes, its judgment shall be conclusive.
IX. SUSPENSION OF PRIVILEGES
HEALTH MATTERS
9.1 It is expressly understood and agreed that Lessor may at any time, without notice to
Lessee or any mortgagee, suspend or revoke any and all privileges granted herein for such length
of time as in its sole judgment is necessary for the purpose of suppressing or arresting an
epidemic of any contagious or infectious disease, or when, in its sole judgment, any suspension
of privileges is necessary to protect the health of the water consumers of San Angelo, Texas. In
the event privileges are suspended by Lessor, rent shall be prorated; and if the lease is revoked,
Lessor shall pay Lessee an amount equal to the market value of any structures or improvements
hereto made or erected on leased premises in compliance with the terms of this lease.
PUBLIC PURPOSES
9.2 If Lessor shall deem that leased premises are required for any public purpose or that
condemnation is necessary, Lessor shall have the right to terminate this lease by giving ninety
(90) days written notice of such termination to Lessee and any mortgagee who has notified the
Water Utilities Department of its lien and its address for notice purposes; and Lessee agrees to
promptly deliver possession of leased premises to Lessor; and this lease shall terminate upon the
6

70. expiration of ninety (90)days after the date of such notice; and in such event Lessor shall pay
Lessee an amount equal to the market value of any structures or improvements hereto made or
erected on leased premises in compliance with the terms of this lease.
X. RELEASE
10.1 Lessee expressly releases Lessor, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all
claims for damages of any kind by reason of the condition of the premises hereby leased, or any
improvements thereon or any damages incurred in the enjoyment or exercise of the privileges
granted hereunder, or for damage to its person or property caused by the opening of the gates at
Nasworthy Dam, the lowering of the normal water elevation in the lake, or due to flood or high
water, or any fluctuating water levels which may arise in the use and operation of Lake
Nasworthy, or in the joint use and operation of Lake Nasworthy, San Angelo Reservoir, and
Twin Buttes Reservoir for the purposes of recreation, irrigation, and water supply, or for any
other purpose.
XI. INDEMNIFICATION
11.1 LESSEE FURTHER AGREES FOR LESSEE AND LESSEE’SSUCCESORS IN
INTEREST TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD LESSOR, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND
EMPLOYEES, FREE AND HARMLESS FROM ANY CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OR
INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY, OR ANY LIABILITY
INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE EXERCISE OF THE PRIVILEGES CONFERRED BY
THIS LEASE, AND AGREES TO REIMBURSE LESSOR FOR ANY EXPENSES
INCURRED IN THE DEFENSE OF ANY SUCH CLAIM, INCLUDING REASONABLE
ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COURT COSTS ACTUALLY INCURRED. NOTHING HEREIN
SHALL REQUIRE THE INDEMNIFYING PARTY TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND OR
HOLDHARMLESS ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY FOR THE INDEMNIFIED PARTY’S
OWN GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT. THIS INDEMNIFICATION
SHALL SURVIVE THE TERM OF THIS LEASE AS LONG AS ANY LIABILITY COULD
BE ASSERTED.
XII. TRANSFER, ASSIGNMENT, AND SUBLETTING
12.1 Lessee may not transfer or assign the leased premises, in whole or in part, without the
prior written consent of the Lessor, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Lessee
may not sublet the leased premises, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the
Lessor. Any such transfer, assignment or sublease shall be evidenced in writing, properly
executed and acknowledged by both parties thereto; a copy shall be delivered to Lessor and the
original shall be recorded in the office of the County Clerk of Tom Green County, Texas. It is
agreed, however, that each such transfer, assignment or sublease shall bind the transferee,
assignee or sublessee to the obligations of Lessee to Lessor as set forth in this lease and shall not
release Lessee from Lessee's obligations under the lease.
XIII. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
7

71. DEFAULT
13.1 (a) Any breach of this lease by Lessee, other than the non-payment of rent, may result in
irreparable damage to Lessor for which Lessor will not have an adequate remedy at law. If
Lessee should default with respect to any of its obligations hereunder except with respect to the
non-payment of rent, and should fail within 60 days after written notice of such default from the
Lessor to cure such default, then Lessee agrees that that Lessor shall be entitled to immediately
seek relief by action or proceeding at law for damages, for specific performance and injunction,
without any requirement to post a bond or other security.
(b) In addition to, and independent of, the provisions of subsection (a), above, should
Lessee violate any provision of this Lease, other than the non-payment of rent, and fail or refuse
to cure such violation within 60 days after written notice of such default from Lessor, then
Lessor or Lessor’s agents may enter the premises as reasonably necessary to perform the work
required as determined by Lessor to cure the default and the costs thereof shall be deemed to be
additional rent, immediately due and payable upon written notice to Lessee of the sum of
expenses, costs, and fees so incurred by Lessor, including an assessment for the cost related to
Lessor’s employee time in curing the default, if any. LESSEE HEREBY WAIVES ANY
CLAIM FOR TRESSPASS OR DAMAGES RELATING TO LESSOR OR LESSOR’S
AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES ENTRY ONTO THE LEASEHOLD PREMISES PURSUANT TO
THE PROVSIONS OF THIS LEASE.
(c) A breach of this lease by Lessee for non-payment of rent shall result in termination of
this lease should Lessee within 60 days after written notice of default setting forth the amount
past due fail to cure such default by making payment of the full amount due Lessor.
POSSESSION
13.2 Lessee agrees at the termination of this lease to deliver possession peacefully to the
Lessor or its agents or employees; and if it fails to give peaceful possession, Lessor may take
forceful possession of said premises and eject all parties therefrom without being guilty of
trespass; and all damages occasioned thereby are hereby waived.
REMOVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS
13.3 All buildings and other improvements placed on the property by Lessee (except trees,
shrubs, flowers and plants) which may be removed without injury to the realty shall remain the
property of Lessee. It is understood and agreed, however, that buildings and improvements shall
be held by the Lessor until all rentals due Lessor by Lessee shall have been paid, and should any
amount remain unpaid for more than thirty (30) days after termination of this lease, the Lessor
shall have the right to sell such buildings and improvements and apply the proceeds to the
amount due Lessor, with interest at the annual rate of ten percent (10%), and to any costs
incident to the sale, and pay the balance remaining, if any, to Lessee. All property remaining on
the premises after the expiration of ninety (90) days following the termination of this lease,
however terminated, shall be deemed abandoned by Lessee and shall become the property of
Lessor.
8

72. OTHER REMEDIES
13.4 (a) Any termination of this lease shall not relieve Lessee from the payment of any sum or
sums that are due and payable to Lessor under the lease, or any claim for damages then or
previously accruing against Lessee under this lease, and any such termination shall not prevent
Lessor from enforcing the payment of any such sum or sums or claim for damages by any
remedy provided for by law, or from recovering damages from Lessee for any default under the
lease. All rights, options, and remedies of Lessor contained in this lease shall be construed and
held to be cumulative, and no one of them shall be exclusive of the other, and Lessor shall have
the right to pursue any one or all of such remedies or any other remedy or relief which may be
provided by law, whether or not stated in this lease. No waiver by Lessor of a breach of any of
the covenants, conditions, or restrictions of this lease shall be construed or held to be a waiver of
any succeeding or preceding breach of the same or any other covenant, condition, or restriction
contained in this lease.
(b) The remedies provided herein shall not be exclusive of other remedies. A failure by
the Lessor to take action on any past violation shall not constitute a waiver of the Lessor’s right
to take action on any subsequent violation.
XIV. MISCELLANEOUS
RELATIONSHIP OF LESSOR AND LESSEE
14.1 The relationship between Lessor and Lessee at all times shall remain solely that of
landlord and tenant and shall not be deemed a partnership or joint venture.
PARTIES BOUND
14.2 This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties of the lease
and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors and
assigns.
HEADINGS
14.3 The paragraph headings contained herein are for convenience and reference and are not
intended to define, extend or limit the scope of any provisions of this lease.
SUPERSEDES PRIOR AGREEMENTS
14.4 If this lease replaces another lease, all prior agreements are superseded by this lease.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT/AMENDMENTS
14.5 This lease constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and Lessor is not bound
by any agreement, condition or stipulation, understanding or representation made by any of
9

73. Lessor’s agents not contained herein. No amendment to this lease shall be effective unless such
is in writing and signed by both parties.
VIOLATIONS OF LEASE
14.6 IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT
THE VIOLATION OF ANY TERM, STIPULATION, CONDITION, OR COVENANT,
SHALL ENTITLE THE LESSOR, AT ITS OPTION, TO TERMINATE THIS LEASE.
FAILURE TO EXERCISE SUCH OPTION AT ANY TIME SHALL NEVER BE
CONSTRUED AS A WAIVER OF ANY CONDITION OF THIS LEASE.
TEXAS LAW TO APPLY
14.7 The parties hereby agree that Texas law will control the interpretation or enforcement of
this lease. This lease has been executed in Texas, and all obligations hereunder are performable
in Tom Green County, Texas.
INVALID OR ILLEGAL PROVISIONS
14.8 If any provision of this lease is held invalid as to any person or set of circumstances, such
holding shall not affect the validity of any remaining provision of this lease or any provision’s
application to other persons not similarly situated or to other circumstances.
REIMBURSEMENT OF LESSOR’S EXPENSES
14.9 Lessee shall pay on demand all of Lessor’s expenses including, but not limited to,
attorney’s fees and court costs incurred in enforcing any of Lessee’s obligations under this lease,
which include, but are not limited to, collection of rental fees and collection of utility payments,
taxes and other legitimate assessments.
NOTICES
14.9 All notices concerning this lease shall be in writing and delivered to the parties at the
addresses below:
LESSEE: Wade and Wendy Honaker
2610 Sleepy Hollow Road
San Angelo, Texas 76904
LESSOR: City of San Angelo
Attn: Water Utilities Director
72 W. College
San Angelo, Texas 76903
[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
10

74. EXECUTED in duplicate originals on the _____day of _____________________, 2012
by:
LESSEE(S)
Wade Honaker
Wendy Honaker
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____day of ________________,
2012 by ______________________________.
Notary Public, State of Texas
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, LESSOR
BY:
RICKY DICKSON
Interim Director
Water Utilities Department
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____day of ________________,
2012, by Ricky Dickson, Interim Director of Water Utilities of the City of San Angelo, a Texas
home rule municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public, State of Texas
11

75. Community and
Economic
Development
Department
Memo
Date: November 30, 2012
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Clinton Bailey, City Engineer
Subject: Agenda item for November 20, 2012 City Council Meeting
Contact: Clinton Bailey, Engineering Services, 657-4203
Caption: Regular
FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
CHAPTER 10, ARTICLE 10.200 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN
ANGELO, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPEED LIMIT OF 45
M.P.H. ON BOTH EAST AND WEST FRONTAGE ROADS OF US HIGHWAY 87
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF US HIGHWAY 87 AND FARM TO
MARKET ROAD 2105 EXTENDING SOUTH 2.553 MILES, PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE
Summary: The Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) performed a speed zoning study
along a section of US Highway 87 frontage road in northwest San Angelo. Based on
the results of the study, TXDOT is proposing to establish a speed limit of 45 mph on
both east and west frontage roads of US Highway 87 beginning at the intersection of
US Highway 87 and Farm to Market Road 2105 extending to a point 2.553 miles
south.
History: n/a
Financial Impact: n/a
Related Vision Item n/a
(if applicable):
Other Information/
Recommendation: Staff recommends amending the Code of Ordinances to allow for establishment of the
proposed speed limit.
Attachments: Ordinance and Request from TxDOT
Presentation: City staff
Publication: n/a
Reviewed by Shawn Lewis, Director of Community and Economic Development, November 8,
Director: 2012
Approved by Legal: Yes

82. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, ARTICLE
10.200 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN
ANGELO, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF A SPEED LIMIT OF 45 M.P.H. ON BOTH EAST AND
WEST FRONTAGE ROADS OF US HIGHWAY 87
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF US HIGHWAY 87N
AND FARM-TO-MARKET ROAD 2105, EXTENDING SOUTH
2.553 MILES, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY, PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE
WHEREAS, on _______________, 2012, the San Angelo City Council authorized
and approved a prima facie reasonable and prudent speed limit of forty-five (45) miles per
hour on portions of US Highway 87 frontage roads, pursuant to state law and based upon
an engineering and traffic study.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
1) THAT, no person shall operate or drive any motor vehicle on the streets
designated below and located within the Corporate City Limits at a speed greater than the
prima facie reasonable and prudent speed that is established thereon as set forth below:
US Highway 87 Frontage Roads 45 M.P.H. as follows:
(A) US Highway 87 east and west frontage roads beginning at the intersection of
US Highway 87 and Farm-to-Market Road 2105, extending south 2.553 miles.
2) THAT, the following severability clause is hereby adopted with this amendment:
SEVERABILITY:
That the terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in
that if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall
not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
3) THAT, the following penalty clause is hereby adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this Article shall be guilty of a
Misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be subject to a fine as provided for in
Section 1.106 of this Code. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate
offense.

83. 4) THAT, this Ordinance shall be effective on, from and after the _____ day of
___________, 2012.
INTRODUCED on the day of , 2012, and finally PASSED,
APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the day of , 2012.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO
ATTEST: BY:
Alvin New, Mayor
By: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form:
Clinton Bailey, City Engineer Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

84. City of San Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: December 4, 2012
To: Mayor and Council members
From: AJ Fawver, AICP
Planning Manager
Subject: consider petition for possible annexation (to San Angelo’s City
limits) of certain properties situated southwest of San Angelo
Location: area encompassing a 20.00 acre tract located at the southern
corner of the intersection of U.S. Highway 67 (Sherwood Way)
and a southward projection of Appaloosa Trail, as shown in
attached exhibit
Contacts: AJ Fawver, AICP
Planning Manager 657-4210
Caption: Discussion and consideration of petition seeking annexation (to
San Angelo’s City limits) of certain properties situated
immediately west/southwest of San Angelo and encompassing a
vacant 20.00 acre tract located at the southern corner of the
intersection of U.S. Highway 67 (Sherwood Way) and a
southward projection of Appaloosa Trail
Summary:
The City staff recommends that, if the City Council chooses to accept the petition for annexing
all 20.00 acres highlighted on the attached map, that the City Council also adopt the attached
draft timetable for completing such annexation.
City staff was presented with a petition for annexation of the property described above and
specifically shown in the attached exhibits. A copy of the petition is also included within the
exhibits. The property in question is entirely vacant and situated adjacent to an apartment

85. development currently undergoing construction, and located on a property under the same
ownership as that under discussion.
By accepting the petition and adopting a calendar of annexation proceedings as prescribed
under Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code, on January 8, 2013, City Council
will initiate a process that may be completed as early as February 15, 2013.
The subject area of proposed annexation is uninhabited and free of any structures.
The Local Government Code authorizes cities to annex sparsely occupied areas on petition
of the area's landowner(s). This section (43.028) only applies to the annexation of areas
that meet the following criteria:
(1) is one-half mile or less in width;
(2) is within the ETJ (Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction) of the city;
(3) is vacant and without residents, or on which fewer than three qualified voters reside;
(4) is contiguous to the annexing city.
Analysis of Proposed Annexation:
It is essential that the foundation statement of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan be considered
in context of considering annexations, specifically that:
"Rapid land use expansion and recent annexations have affected the identity
of the City and established a new development pattern that is fiscally
unsustainable."
This Plan provides guidance for annexation, many of which are relevant to this scenario.
First, the plan establishes a goal stating that the City should "annex areas before extensive
development of home sites and business properties occurs, guiding any such development
within a framework of municipal regulations on zoning, subdivision, signs, fire prevention
and building construction." This excerpt is relevant in this situation, because the area is
vacant, and thus, no such development is in place. However, this argument alone is not
compelling enough on its own - as vacant property is currently in place outside the city limits
all around San Angelo - and should not necessarily be annexed.
However, the Subdivision Ordinance requires that development that seeks to utilize San
Angelo's water service petition for annexation before such service can be extended. It
appears in this case that such a purposeful and specifically-situated tract - in the context
that the neighboring property under the same ownership which is developing currently - was
created specifically to pursue annexation in order to develop. As such, the second goal
outlined in this Plan advises to "balance short-term costs of making measured capital
improvements in possible annexation areas with the long-term costs of not annexing these
same areas." More specifically, "recognize that determining best areas for annexation
involves anticipating realistic potential for development around the urban fringe, annexing
the most promising such areas...".
Another important consideration of this specific location is the fact that the current
development, created when platting the property, now embraced within The Boulevard
subdivision, created in summer 2011. When this plat was drafted and approved, it

86. contained a particularly important piece for the southwest part of San Angelo: the dedication
of a piece of Appaloosa Trail, a minor collector street planned long-term in the Thoroughfare
Plan to eventually provide a connection from the developing areas just west of the
intersection of FM 2288 and Sherwood Way to the emerging neighborhood south of
Southland Boulevard and looping back northeast along Pinon Ridge and Oak Grove
Boulevard, eventually connecting to Houston Harte Expressway. For now, the only lateral
routes of significant carrying ability connecting these two segments of the city are FM
2288/Southland Boulevard and Sherwood Way/US Hwy 67. Development along this area
would result in future segments of Appaloosa Trail being pieced together, though this is
clearly a very long-term endeavor.
The Comprehensive Plan goes on to state that it is important to "identify specific areas
where...annexation may be useful for incorporating expected new development...within City
limits, especially where an infrastructure of water utilities already exists."
In this area, a network of water and sewer mains, available for extension, are in existence.
These were extended and tied into during the process of developing The Boulevard
subdivision.
Financial Impact: not applicable, yet
Recommendation: City staff recommends that City Council accept the proposed
schedule of hearings as outlined below. Even before those public hearings may begin, the
governing body must decide whether to “accept” or “reject” a petition for annexation. Accepting
such petition does not commit the governing body to approving any or all of the requested
annexation. Accepting such petition simply initiates a series of proceedings which may
eventually lead to annexation. These hearings allow the opportunity for input from the public,
interested parties, and the petitioner - for consideration by the City Council.
annexation calendar (no special meetings needed)
first public hearing December 18, 2012
second public hearing January 8, 2013
introduce annexation January 22, 2013
ordinance, on first
reading
second and final reading February 15, 2013
of annexation ordinance
Attachments: map as provided by the applicant, of the proposed area
draft survey map as provided by the applicant
petition as submitted to City staff

87. Presentation: AJ Fawver, AICP, Planning Manager
Publication: No legal notice required at this time. However, if City Council
agrees to accept this petition, legal notice of required public
hearings will need to be published (in the newspaper) and
posted on the City’s web site.

94. City of San Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: December 4, 2012
To: City Council members
From: Kevin Boyd, Planner
Subject: Z 12-13: Creed Partners, LLC., a request of a Zone change
from Light Manufacturing (ML) to General Commercial (CG)
to allow for "Retail Sales and Service" on the following
property:
Location: 1601 Knickerbocker Road, approximately 230 feet from the
intersection of Knickerbocker Road and South Jackson
Street, in southwestern San Angelo. This property occupies
4.086 acres of the MC Neese Survey 0176.25 abstract 1641.
Purpose: Approval or modification of this request by the Planning
Commission would forward the recommendation to City
Council for a final decision on the matter.
Contacts: Creed Partners, LLC. 210-621-3288
Kevin Boyd, Planner 325-657-4210
Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance
amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of
Ordinances, City of San Angelo
Z 12-13: Creed Partners, LLC.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH
SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING
REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING
THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1601 Knickerbocker Road, approximately
230 feet from the intersection of Knickerbocker Road and South
Jackson Street, in southwestern San Angelo. This property

95. occupies 4.086 acres of the MC Neese Survey 0176.25 abstract
1641, changing the zoning classification from Light
Manufacturing (ML) to General Commercial (CG) District;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
Summary: The City Council may:
(1) Recommend approving the proposed Zone change as requested; or
(2) Recommend modifying the application to some alternative zoning
classification believed to be more appropriate; or
(3) Deny the proposed Zone change.
Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed Zone
change.
On November 19, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended approving this
request by an unanimous vote of 6-0.
History and Background:
General Information
Existing Zoning: Light Manufacturing (ML)
Existing Land Use: Vacant Golden Corral restaurant,
commercial parking and partially open lot
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:
North: General Commercial (CG) Rosas Cafe (under
construction)
West: Light Manufacturing (ML) Citibank, Taco Bell, Advance
Eye Care, General Builders
Supply Inc., Alexander
Construction Co. and vacant
lot
South: Light Manufacturing (ML) A-1 Distribution Inc. /
Budweiser
East: Light Manufacturing (ML) Toyota Dealership and Angelo
Place student housing

96. Thoroughfares/Streets: Knickerbocker Road and S Jackson Street
are defined as an "arterial streets," which
are designed to connect collector streets to
freeways and carry large volumes of traffic
at high speeds. Access is secondary and
mobility is the prime function of these
streets.
Zoning History: In 1949, the property was annexed into the
city.
As far back as 1964, the property has
been zoned Light Manufacturing (M-1), an
equivalent to the current zoning.
On Tuesday, August 9, 1994, the City
Council voted to approve a sign variance
request to allow for two freestanding signs
for the Golden Corral restaurant, on the
property.
Applicable Regulations: Refer to off-street parking standards, per
Section 511.
Development Standards: General Commercial (CG) requires a 25
feet front setback for commercial
structures. No side or rear setback are
required in commercial districts unless the
lot abuts a residential district or use, where
a minimum of 10 feet is required, per
Section 502.
The maximum floor area or gross floor
area of all buildings on the lot divided by
the total area of the lot in an area zoned
CG is 2, twice the area of the lot, per
Section 502.
Vision Plan Map: Commercial
Related Comp Plan
Excerpts: "...incentivize new retail in infill locations
within a defined framework."
Create new physical connections to
neighborhoods lined with transitional and
intermediate uses."

97. Establish transition areas to better "scale-
down" intensity of use from commercial
centers to neighborhoods."
Special Information
Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning to commercial will
increase the volume of traffic than if the
property remained as-is.
Parking Requirements: Varies depending on the use or
occupancy category, per Section 511.
Parking Provided: More than 100 paved parking spaces exist
on the property.
Density: Surrounding uses are predominately
medium density commercial and
residential. The plan complies with the
Vision Plan, which calls for a continuation
of the future development of this area
as a “Commercial."
Notification Required: Yes
Notifications Sent: 6
Responses in Favor: 1
Responses in Opposition: 1
Analysis:
In order to approve this Zone change request, the Planning Commission
members are first required to consider the following criteria:
1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is
compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies
adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.
2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning
Ordinance.
3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses
surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.

98. 4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed
conditions that require an amendment.
5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the
natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise,
storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical
functioning of the natural environment.
6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.
7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban
development in the community.
The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.
In considering the nature of this request, staff believes that a Zone change to
General Commercial (CG) is compatible with the surrounding area and will be a
nice transition relative to the current zoning. The request is consistent with
aspects of the Vision Plan which calls for ‘Commercial’ in the area which seeks to
cluster single-use centers to include retail and similar uses. This zoning change
would encourage redevelopment and provide opportunities for commercial
development that would be compatible with surrounding uses, considering the
factors outlined below.
The nature of this request, a Zone change to General Commercial (CG) for “retail
sales and service”, would allow for a wide variety of uses – branch banks,
restaurants, cafes, health clubs, gyms, dance halls, theaters and hotels. While
the zoning to the west, east, and south is zoned for Light Manufacturing (ML),
many of the uses are commercial in nature. Staff has recommended a Zone
change given the inappropriateness of ML zoning for the intended use. In the
past, the area was zoned ML as the intended use since city leaders envisioned
the area to be a industrial hub, given its proximity of the rail lines and current
development patterns at that time. More recently, conditional uses have been
approved for nearby properties to allow for retail sales and services (CU03-04)
and multi-family residential buildings (CU06-03), in a ML zone, just to name a
few. Staff recommends a Zone change process over the Conditional Use process
to better support the known vision of this area, rather than repeated requests for
augmentation over time.
“Retail sales and service” is compatible with surrounding uses in the area.
Knickerbocker Road is an established commercial corridor as uses varies from
light-to-medium-density commercial and multi-family residential. Surrounding

99. uses include restaurants, a bank branch, construction and supply shop, a beer
distribution plant, a car dealership and student apartments. Angelo State
University's recreational facilities, including the Junell Center / Stephens Arena,
are located a block north of the subject property.
The property is zoned for Light Manufacturing (ML) located in a commercial
corridor. ML zoning does not allow for retail sales and service by right, nor does it
follow the directed vision for this area. A transition to commercial zoning is more
appropriate given that there are similar uses and the fact that this segment of
Knickerbocker Road is an established corridor. While Neighborhood Commercial
(CN) supports Retail Sales and Service, it is not a viable option with this request.
CN zoning is less intensive and places limitations in the Maximum Floor Area
Ratio, which is 60 percent, and maximum height of 35 feet.
Some aspects of the natural environment will be affected if the Zone change
results in future development of the property. Given the nature of allowed uses in
the proposed zoning, staff believes that the small scale of the site will have
limited affects on water and air quality. Much of the noise generated from the site
is likely to come from vehicular traffic. The open space portion of lot which is
overgrown with grass and wild shrubs, may be removed in the event
development does occur on the site - there are also a few sparsely placed trees
and bushes. Since the area around the site is mostly developed, there are no
major issues regarding wildlife, or any type of wetlands.
This plan serves a community need in that it seeks to provide development that
is consistent with the development patterns and aspects of the Vision Plan. The
zone change to CG supports the type and scale of uses that exist nearby. Creed
Partners, LLC., the proponent and owners of the property, initiated the Zone
change request and have plans to construct a new restaurant, some retail space,
and a hotel. It is located in an area in which infill development is desired and
needed, especially in this case, where the lot fell into disuse and has become a
blighted area of the corridor. The lot has stood vacant ever since the Golden
Corral closed its doors back 2009, and roughly a third of the property remains
open space. While the mere presence of a vacant lot is not on its own enough to
justify a zone change, the fact that the zone change has been upheld as
appropriate by the Vision Plan map, the infrastructure in place, the logical and
orderly development, and the transportation network - paired with this fact - can
justify the proposal.
Regarding parking: in order to receive a Certificate of Occupancy for a new
business, an applicant must provide adequate off-street parking, based on the
occupancy category or use, per Section 511. The off-street parking mentioned in
the section represents the minimum parking standards. While staff found that the
site has over a hundred parking spaces, given some uncertainties in the future
development, an assessment of the required parking cannot be fully determined -
this will become a function of the site plan review process.

100. The request is consistent with current developmental patterns and echoes the
Vision Plan which calls for the property to be designated as “Commercial”.
Ideally, given the nature of its location, this area is ideal for this type of
development as it serves as a node for two arterial streets. It is adjacent to a
corner lot at the intersection of Knickerbocker Road and S Jackson Street.
Current developmental trends, echoed by the Comprehensive Plan, denote that
the area be dedicated for commercial use. Staff feels that a Zone change to
General Commercial (CG) would be an appropriate zone type as commercial
activity becomes more established along the corridor.
Proposed Conditions
N/A
Attachments: Excerpt from zoning map, showing the general
location within the City of San Angelo;
Excerpt from the comprehensive plan vision map
highlighting the subject property;
Excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject
property; and
Aerial photo, highlighting subject property.
Draft minutes from November 19, 2012 Planning
Commission;
Citizen responses; and
Draft ordinance.
Presentation: Kevin Boyd, Planner
Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, AICP, Planning Manager (11/14/2012)

109. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A
ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT 1601 Knickerbocker Road, approximately 230 feet from
the intersection of Knickerbocker Road and South Jackson Street, in
southwestern San Angelo. This property occupies 4.086 acres of the MC Neese
Survey 0176.25 abstract 1641, changing the zoning classification from Light
Manufacturing (ML) to General Commercial (CG) District; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
RE: Z 12-13: Creed Partners, LLC.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing
body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with
reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication
and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and
in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out
herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted
by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is
hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally
and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 1601
Knickerbocker Road, approximately 230 feet from the intersection of Knickerbocker
Road and South Jackson Street, in southwestern San Angelo. This property occupies
4.086 acres of the MC Neese Survey 0176.25 abstract 1641 shall henceforth be
permanently zoned as follows: General Commercial (CG) District.
The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the
Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.
SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described
property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.
SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:

110. SEVERABILITY:
The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,
if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in
Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of
such violation shall constitute a separate offense.
INTRODUCED on the 4th day of December, 2012 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND
ADOPTED on this the 18th day of December, 2012.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form:
_________________________ ________________________
AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

111. City of San Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: December 4, 2012
To: City Council members
From: Kevin Boyd, Planner
Subject: Z 12-14: Basil El-Masri, a request of a zone change from a
combination of Ranch & Estate (R&E) and General
Commercial (CG), to single zoning of General Commercial
(CG), on the following property:
Location: 4028 South Bryant Boulevard, approximately 350 feet from
the intersection of South Bryant Boulevard and Ben Ficklin
Road. This property occupies 4.35 acres of the E Hermes
Survey 0174 abstract 0349, in southern San Angelo.
Purpose: Approval or modification of this request by the Planning
Commission would forward the recommendation to City
Council for a final decision on the matter.
Contacts: Basil El-Masri, Owner 325-895-2426
Kevin Boyd, Planner 325-657-4210
Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance
amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of
Ordinances, City of San Angelo
Z 12-14: Basil El-Masri
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH
SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING
REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING
THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: 4028 South Bryant Boulevard,
approximately 350 feet from the intersection of South Bryant
Boulevard and Ben Ficklin Road. This property occupies 4.35

112. acres of the E Hermes Survey 0174 abstract 0349, in southern
San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a
combination of Ranch & Estate (R&E) and General Commercial
(CG), to single zoning of General Commercial (CG); PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
Summary: The City Council may:
(1) Approve the proposed zone change as requested; or
(2) Modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to
be more appropriate; or
(3) Deny the proposed zone change.
Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed zone
change.
On November 19, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended approving this
request by an unanimous vote of 6-0.
History and Background:
The request for a zone change was initiated partly due to a pending code
violation relating to the use of the property. While mostly open, and free of any
permanent structures, a portion of the lot is occupied by recreational vehicles or
RVs, identified as ‘Wholesale Trade’ in Section 310 in the Ordinance. In order to
rectify the issue, the owner applied for a Conditional Use that would give an
exception for the existing use and also filed an application to rezone the lot to a
single district for greater flexibilities in expanding the use in the future.
To be clear, the amount of outdoor storage and display allowed presently for the
CG-zoned portion of the tract is .32 acres, or 10% of the size of that tract. The
R&E-zoned portion does not allow outside storage under any circumstances. If
the zone change request to zone the remainder of the lot as CG is approved, it
will allow for 10% of the size of the tract, or .435 acres, to be utilized for outdoor
storage. This results in a net increase in the allowed outdoor storage of .115
acres, or 5,009 square feet. However, Section 504.D states that "Vehicles
(including boats) shall not be considered merchandise, material or equipment
subject to the restrictions of this section." RVs are considered vehicles because
they are used in this way: "by which any person or property is or may be
transported or drawn upon a thoroughfare, except devices moved by human

113. power or used exclusively upon stationary tracks or rails" as explained in San
Angelo's traffic section of the Code of Ordinances. In the future, however,
merchandise and materials not counted as a vehicle, that is not garbage, and is
not enclosed would be required to fall within this 10% figure.
General Information
Existing Zoning: General Commercial (CG) and Ranch &
Estate (R&E)
Existing Land Use: Mostly vacant commercial lot
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:
North: Ranch & Estate (R&E) Vacant residential lot
West: General Commercial (CG) Stripes gas station, Ray's Transfer &
Storage, Cross Texas Supply
South: General Commercial (CG) Brannon Nursery & Landscape, Hurt
Ink Tattoo, Christian Church of San
Angelo
East: Ranch & Estate (R&E) Residential dwelling
Thoroughfares/Streets: S Bryant Blvd is defined as an "arterial
street," which is designed to connect
collector streets to freeways and carries
large volumes of traffic at high speeds.
Access is secondary and mobility is the
prime function of these streets.
Zoning History: In 1949, the property was annexed into the
city.
In 1964, the property was zoned Ranch &
Estate (R&E), in 1987, property was zoned
a combination of General Commercial
(CG) and Ranch & Estate (R&E), the same
zoning that is in place today.
Applicable Regulations: Construction or installation of any principal
building on a lot requires at least 2 off-
street parking spaces.
Development Standards: General Commercial (CG) requires a 25
feet front setback for commercial
structures. No side or rear setback are
required in commercial districts unless the
lot abuts a residential district or use, where

114. a minimum of 10 feet is required, per
Section 502.
The maximum floor area or gross floor
area of all buildings on the lot divided by
the total area of the lot in an area zoned
CG is 2, twice the area of the lot, per
Section 502.
Vision Plan Map: Commercial
Related Comp Plan
Excerpts: “Promote better transition between
nearby commercial and residential use of
land and buildings.”
"Require a buffer separating commercial,
industrial, or agricultural zoned lands from
neighborhoods."
“Establish transition areas between
commercial areas and nearby
neighborhoods.”
"Create new physical connections to
neighborhoods lined with transitional and
intermediate uses."
Special Information
Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning to commercial will
increase the volume of traffic than if the
property remained as-is. Since the much of
the lot is already commercially zoned,
traffic increases will be a minimum.
Parking Requirements: N/A
Parking Provided: Currently, the property does not have off-
street parking.
Density: Surrounding uses are predominately low-
to-medium density commercial and
residential. The plan complies with the
Vision Plan, which calls for a continuation
of the future development of this area
as a “Commercial."
Notification Required: Yes

115. Notifications Sent: 9
Responses in Favor: 0
Responses in Opposition: 1
Analysis:
In order to approve this zone change request, the Planning Commission
members are first required to consider the following criteria:
1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is
compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies
adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.
2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning
Ordinance.
3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses
surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.
4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed
conditions that require an amendment.
5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the
natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise,
storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical
functioning of the natural environment.
6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.
7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban
development in the community.
The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.
The subject property lies within two districts. While much of the lot is zoned
General Commercial (CG), less than a third is zoned Ranch & Estate (R&E), as
shown in the zoning map attached to this report. The Vision Plan identifies long-
range prospects for the subject property to be ‘Commercial’ in use, which

116. consists of single-use centers – large retail and office clusters, for example – that
seek visibility and convenient access to the street. Rezoning the portion of the lot
zoned R&E to CG is consistent with the overall intent of the vision and matches
the CG zoning that already exists. Both the Comprehensive Plan from 2003 and
general planning principles argue against maintaining a variety of different zoning
districts for a singular platted parcel. This practice works against the orderly
development called for in the Zoning Ordinance, and it creates difficulty in
development as each zoning district carries with it distinct requirements. The
property owner recognizes the advantage in this lot maintaining one zoning
district, especially for future development along such a major traffic carrier for the
city. As such, this request is compatible with existing plans and policies.
Planning staff believes that CG is the most appropriate zoning for the area.
Although there is more intensive commercial zoning in the area-CG/CH-it is a
zoning district which is planned for phasing out, and as such, is no longer
available for zone change requests. Roughly 500' to the south and 3500' to the
north are areas planned to function as nodes of "Neighborhood Center" activity.
The "Commercial" designation encompasses CO, CG, and CH zoning
classifications. While it is hopeful that this commercial corridor be diversified with
a mixture of zoning types - including CO - this is more likely to happen on much
smaller tracts. This 4.3 acre tract with direct access to South Bryant Boulevard
has functioned within a CG zoning district since 1987, and this request is a small
enlargement of that zoning within the very same tract that has been within this
district for 25 years. If this were the introduction of a new commercial zoning
district - staff's analysis would likely take a different approach. Based on the
specific characteristics of this request, it appears to support the Zoning
Ordinance principle of encouraging the tendency of commercial use within
defined areas. As such, this request appears compatible with the Zoning
Ordinance.
The Ordinance allows for three types of outdoor storage and display in non-
residential districts, per Section 504. Generally speaking, CG zoning falls under
Type 2: Limited Outdoor Storage - which limits storage to 10 percent or 1,000
square feet of the total lot, whichever is greater. Part of the reason for this
limitation is to allow the CG district to function in areas of transition, and to
minimize the amount of storage ultimately utilized to something moderate. Again
- this limitation on storage already applies to 3/4 or more of the tract in question.
The amount is not proposed to be increased in any way, nor would staff
recommend it be. The applicant’s accompanying request for a Conditional Use
for Wholesale Trade - also on this agenda - will also limit the applicant to Type 2
outdoor storage. The CG zoning is compatible with and matches both the uses
and zoning to the south and west of the property. Though the transition from CG
to R&E on the north and east of the property is not ideal - the situation exists
today and has since 1987. This request would still "hold the line" on the CG
zoning being entirely encompassed within a singular ownership tract and not
continuing onto neighboring properties. Also, the requirement of a Conditional

117. Use for Wholesale Trade - something not allowed by right in the CG zoning
district - allows the opportunity for the Commission to place conditions to help
better mitigate this transition. It is important to realize that the very nature of the
R&E zoning district has been treated as unique for decades - it's large minimum
lot sizes, large setback requirements, and the waiving of screening in the Zoning
Ordinance for nonresidential properties abutting it, recognizes the ability for it to
withstand transitions less ideal; on the other hand, stringent screening
requirements, small lot sizes, and small setback restrictions recognize that other
types of residential zoning are not as capable of managing these transitions. It is
also clear that some of the more noxious uses allowed in CH districts would not
be appropriate immediately adjacent to residential properties, nor does CH rely
on visibility the same way CG zoning districts do. Based upon the compliance
with the zoning called for on the Vision Plan map, and the discussion above of
existing and proposed uses, this request appears to be compatible with the
surrounding area.
Changed conditions in this area include the continued - and some would argue,
accelerated - momentum of this corridor emerging as a commercial corridor,
attracting traffic from both within the city as well as from the outlying communities
and an intense frequency of truck traffic. The Planning Commission discussed
the Vision Plan map in this general area back in 2010, and recognized these
changes in a Vision Plan map amendment for this area of the corridor to
"commercial" - realizing that this "commercial" development should be done in a
diversified matter, mixing types of commercial to avoid solid strip development.
As such, changed conditions play some part in this analysis.
The natural environment within proximity to this tract includes the river property
(called to remain as "Open Space") around 800' - 1000' to the west. This property is
separated from this area by a substantial 6.5 acre home site. Travelling across
South Bryant to the west, the natural environment remains in place along some
sizable vacant tracts, but is interspersed with more industrial types of development.
On the site itself, the property is relatively flat and it does not appear that water/air
quality would be negatively impacted, since the uses of the site are limited and
specifically exclude noxious uses. Wildlife and wetlands are not present, and the
practical functioning of the natural environment to the east will remain unaffected. In
the future, it is possible to imagine a variety of retail or related ventures on this
property - however, their only access point is South Bryant Boulevard, and it is
difficult to imagine any value in sending traffic elsewhere. Noise is always a
possibility along such a major arterial roadway, but the nature of the R&E district as
described above, paired with the small expansion of this CG as zone as proposed -
within the same tract - does not appear to make a substantial change in effects.
The sixth criterion outlined in the Zoning Ordinance for consideration is that of a
Community Need. As described earlier, the maintaining of tracts throughout the
city with a variety of zoning districts criss-crossing them is a lingering issue that
can create problems not only for the property owner, but for the community and

118. the long-term viability of an area. Staff continues to attempt to identify and rectify
these issues where possible, and in this case, one could argue this change
continues to serve a community need for those reasons.
Logical and orderly development is another tenet of the Zoning Ordinance's
Section 212. In this case, the zoning requested is consistent with the changes in
this area, the surroundings - for reasons already articulated - and it fits the plans
for this area. For all intents and purposes, this appears to result in a logical and
orderly pattern.
Proposed Conditions
N/A
Attachments: Excerpt from zoning map, showing the general
location within the City of San Angelo;
Excerpt from the comprehensive plan vision map
highlighting the subject property;
Excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject
property; and
Aerial photo, highlighting subject property.
Draft minutes from November 19, 2012 Planning
Commission;
Citizen responses; and
Draft ordinance.
Presentation: Kevin Boyd, Planner
Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, AICP, Planning Manager (11/14/12)

126. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A
ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT 4028 South Bryant Boulevard, approximately 350 feet
from the intersection of South Bryant Boulevard and Ben Ficklin Road. This
property occupies 4.35 acres of the E Hermes Survey 0174 abstract 0349, in
southern San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a combination of
Ranch & Estate (R&E) and General Commercial (CG), to single zoning of
General Commercial (CG); PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND
PROVIDING A PENALTY
RE: Z 12-14: Basil El-Masri
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing
body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with
reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication
and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and
in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out
herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted
by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is
hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally
and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 4028
South Bryant Boulevard, approximately 350 feet from the intersection of South
Bryant Boulevard and Ben Ficklin Road. This property occupies 4.35 acres of the E
Hermes Survey 0174 abstract 0349, in southern San Angelo shall henceforth be
permanently zoned as follows: General Commercial (CG) District.
The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the
Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.
SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described
property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.
SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:

127. SEVERABILITY:
The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,
if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in
Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of
such violation shall constitute a separate offense.
INTRODUCED on the 4th day of December, 2012 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND
ADOPTED on this the 18th day of December, 2012.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form:
_________________________ ________________________
AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

128. City of San
Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: December 4, 2012
To: City Council members
From: Roxanne Johnston, Planner
Subject: Z12-15: Julie Snider, requesting a zone change from Ranch
and Estate (R&E) to General Commercial (CG), to
specifically allow an Animal Crematorium, an “Industrial
Service” as defined by Section 316A of the Zoning
Ordinance, on the following property:
Location: 4126 Lake Drive, located approximately 100 feet from the
intersection of Lake Drive and North Bryant Boulevard; more
specifically occupying the Short George Addition, Blocks 9 and
10, 180’ x 484’ tract less the southwest 0.1020 acre, in western
San Angelo.
Purpose: This request would allow for the building of an animal
crematorium on the subject property upon final approval of
the Planning Commission for a Conditional Use Permit.
Contacts: Julie Snider (325) 655-0198
Roxanne Johnston, Planner (325) 657-4210
Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance
amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of
Ordinances, City of San Angelo
Z 12-15: Julie Snider
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH
SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING
REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING
THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING

129. PROPERTY, TO WIT: : 4126 Lake Drive, located approximately
100 feet from the intersection of Lake Drive and North Bryant
Boulevard; more specifically occupying the Short George
Addition, Blocks 9 and 10, 180’ x 484’ tract less the southwest
0.1020 acre, changing the zoning classification from Ranch &
Estate (R&E) to a General Commercial (CG) District; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
Summary: The City Council may:
(1) Approve this zone change request from R&E to CG which would allow
for the placement of an animal crematorium; or
(2) Modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to
be more appropriate; or
(3) Deny this zoning request from R&E to CG to allow for the placement of an
animal crematorium.
Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed zone
change.
On November 19, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended approval of
this request by a unanimous vote of 6-0.
History and Background:
General Information
Existing Zoning: Ranch & Estate (R&E)
Existing Land Use: Rural; a vacant lot with one empty storage
shed located in the middle northeast
section. A single strand wire fence
primarily surrounds the property on the
south and west borders.
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:
North: R&E Used for storage
West: R&E Used for storage
South: ML Lake Drive and vacant pasture
East: R&E Residential building

130. Thoroughfares/Streets: North Bryant Boulevard Frontage Road is
defined as an “arterial street” and is
designed to connect collector streets to
freeways and other arterials carrying large
volumes of traffic at high speeds. Access
is secondary and mobility is the primary
function of these streets.
Lake Drive is defined as a “collector street”
which provides direct access to residential,
commercial and other land uses.
Zoning History: The subject property has consistently
remained R&E since being zoned as such
in the 1970’s. In 1980, Special Permit 776
was approved by the Planning
Commission to locate a mobile home on a
parcel to the northeast, but it was
withdrawn. The property just east of the
subject property was given Special Permit
767 in 1980 to locate a mobile home and it
was approved by City Counsel with
conditions. Also in 1980, the subject
property and the property to the west were
given Special Permit 251 that allowed for a
mobile home and to have two residences
on one zoning lot, with conditions.
Applicable Regulations: Section 504. Type 3: General Outdoor
Storage
“Type 3 General Outdoor Storage shall be
allowed in unlimited quantity.”
Section 303. Residential Intent
Statements
"A. The Ranch and Estate District is
intended to provide opportunities for
development of low density, detached
single-family residences on lots of at least
one acre in a suburban or rural setting.
The District is also intended to serve as a
holding zone for vacant land areas
annexed to the City."
Section 304. Commercial District Intent
Statements

131. "C. CG (General Commercial) District. The
General Commercial District is intended to
provide opportunities for development of
commercial establishments of higher
intensity, with larger trade area, floor area
and traffic generation than Neighborhood
Commercial uses Limited outdoor storage,
screened from adjacent residential uses,
may be appropriate.
D. The Heavy Commercial District is
intended to provide opportunities for
development of wholesale trade, retail
sales, warehousing development, repair
and service establishments, heavy and
bulk equipment supply dealers or other
such establishments that typically are
characterized by outside storage of
materials or merchandise.”
Section 316. Industrial Use Categories
"A.3. Examples (of industrial use
categories) include mortuary and
crematory services, not on same site as
funeral home…"
Related Comp Plan
Excerpts: 2000 Zoning Ordinance, Vision Map, and
Thoroughfare Map; City of San Angelo,
Texas.
Vision Plan. Rural. Intent and Goal 1.
“Rural areas…will…come under the largest
pressure to develop more intensively…
Ensure suitability of development in Rural
areas, promoting overall compatibility and
avoiding overload of rural structure,
especially the street.”
"Establish transition areas to better
"scale-down" intensity of use from
commercial centers to neighborhoods."
"Require a buffer separating commercial,
industrial, or agricultural zoned lands from
neighborhoods."

132. "Rezone or remove any CG/CH zoning
from adjacent to existing neighborhoods."
"Ensure suitability of development in Rural
areas, promoting overall compatibility.."
Special Information
Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning to General Commercial
will increase the volume of traffic more than if
the property remained as-is. For the
proposed usage, volume would be low.
Future Heavy Commercial uses could yield
higher traffic that the area may not be able to
sustain in its current condition; although
should the requested zone change from
Ranch and Estate to General Commercial be
granted, it would be more in line with the
Vision Plan and the Thoroughfare Plan.
Access to and from the property off of North
Bryant Frontage Road falls under the
jurisdiction of TXDOT.
Access to and from the property from Lake
Drive is reasonable for low volume traffic
because the property fronts Lake drive
approximately 89.5’ and the standard 30’
driveway entrance would fit.
Parking Requirements: Varies depending on the use or occupancy,
per Section 511, which also states “In no
circumstance shall new construction or
installation of any principal building on a lot
require any less than 2 off-street parking
spaces...”
Parking Provided: Currently, there is no provision for parking
because the project has not been
constructed.
Density: Surrounding uses are predominately rural.
The intent for use as an “animal
crematorium” within this zone change
request complies with the Vision Plan;
however, not all future changes in use under
the same category comply.
Notification Required: Yes

133. Notifications Sent: 4
Responses in Favor: 1
Responses in Opposition: 0
Analysis:
In order to approve this request, the City Council members are first required to
consider the following criteria:
1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is
compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted
by the Planning Commission or City Council.
2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatible with the Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding
the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.
4. Changed Conditions. Whether or the extent to which there are changed
conditions that require an amendment.
5. Considers Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and to the extent of which
the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the
natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm
water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of
the natural environment.
6. Considers Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.
7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in
the community.
The staff recommendation is based upon the following.
The initial request from the proponent was to rezone the subject property to Heavy
Commercial because under this zoning, an animal crematorium would be allowed.
During the Planning Commission meeting held on November 19, 2012, Planning staff
argued against the initial request because it was not in line with the seven criteria
listed above. The Planning Commission therefore recommended approval of a
modification of a CG zoning to the City Council. They also issued Planning staff a

134. directive to submit to the Planning Commission an application for a Conditional Use
that would allow the proponent the opportunity to place an animal crematorium on the
subject property should they grant the request.
In this situation, where Heavy Commercial is the only district that allows for an animal
crematorium, Staff feels that General Commercial zoning, along with a Conditional
Use Permit, would be a more viable option for the proponent and the area than
simply placing a Heavy Commercial zone next to Ranch and Estate.
The allowance of unlimited storage was a key negative element when considering a
straight zone change from Ranch and Estate to Heavy Commercial. Also stressed
was the possibility that if zoned Heavy Commercial, a use other than the proposed
could locate there and have an extremely negative impact on the land; such as those
outlined in Section 304.D of the Zoning Ordinance (see above, “Applicable
Regulations”). Therefore, General Commercial would be more compatible next to
Ranch and Estate because it calls for limited storage along with screening, which
would mitigate the environmental impacts usually associated with outdoor storage
such as visual clutter, noise and heavy equipment that would place a large burden on
Lake Drive and a Conditional Use would guarantee that no other industrial use
business could locate there.
The Zoning Ordinance states that zoning decisions will take into accordance the
Vision Plan. The Vision Plan does call for specific areas of the city to be “Industrial.”
Staff interprets this to imply that Heavy Commercial could be more concentrated in
these areas since compatibility with other land uses have been carefully considered.
The nature of an “industrial” use with regard to land use is that it is more heavy and
intense than other classifications and again, Ranch and Estate is one of the least
intensive. Placing the two next to each other does not create a sensible border, so a
General Commercial zone would provide a gentler buffer between land uses as
opposed to Heavy Commercial.
The Vision Plan calls for the subject property and the properties to the north, south
and west, to be Commercial, so a zone change at this time to General Commercial
falls in line with that document, which , like the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning
Ordinance, was adopted by the City Council. The area to the east and southeast,
according to the Vision Plan, will remain rural in nature and is not projected to be
rezoned.
The Comprehensive Plan, too, recognizes the need for General Commercial next to
Ranch and Estate instead of Heavy Commercial, noting that even CG/CH zoning
adjacent to neighborhoods should be eliminated - CH zoning is even more intensive,
although, again, it is the only zoning district that allows for a crematorium.
In looking at the compatibility with the surrounding area, it is important to note that,
while there are some more industrial or heavy types of uses along North Bryant Blvd,
the proximity of this site to a rural neighborhood makes it a unique site. The

135. requirements to zone in accordance with the Vision Plan are also a very important
concept to remember.
With just one animal crematorium located in the City of San Angelo along
Knickerbocker Road, there is a demonstrated community need to add another. Such
a zone change and possible Conditional Use Permit on the subject property could
provide a community benefit as the trend in people seeking such services for their
pets is on the rise. Although the area has not experience a lot of growth and change
in land use since the 1970’s, such an establishment, again, would not cause the area
to drastically change.
The proposed zone change from Ranch and Estate to General Commercial, is a
better fit to the area than the original request put before the Planning
Commission where the proponent was seeking a zone change to Heavy
Commercial. General Commercial with a possible Conditional Use to allow for an
animal crematorium is even much more sensible and suitable. Roughly less than
one half of the immediate surrounding land will remain Ranch and Estate. As
such, this would be a more appropriate and responsible development approach.
Attachments: Excerpt from Zoning Map, showing the general
location within the City of San Angelo;
Excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision Map
highlighting the subject property;
Excerpt from Zoning Map, highlighting subject
property; and
Aerial photo, highlighting subject property.
Citizen response;
Draft minutes from November 19, 2012 Planning
Commission meeting; and
Draft ordinance.
Presentation: Roxanne Johnston, Planner
Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, AICP, Planning Manager (11/14/12)

141. Exhibit 1. Minute Excerpt from November 19, 2012 Planning Commission
Meeting.
B. Z 12-15: Julie Snider
A request for a zone change from Ranch and Estate (R&E) to Heavy
Commercial (CH) to specifically allow an “Animal Crematorium” included in
the category of "Industrial Services" as defined by Section 316.A of the
Zoning Ordinance on the following property:
4126 Lake Drive, located approximately 100 feet from the intersection of
Lake Drive and North Bryant Boulevard; more specifically occupying the
Short George Addition, Blocks 9 and 10, 180’ x 484’ tract less the southwest
0.1020 acre, in western San Angelo.
Roxanne Johnston, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent
with the staff recommendation of denial. There were four notifications sent as
required for this request, with one received in favor and zero received in
opposition. Ms. Johnston showed maps and photos of the area in question.
The notification in favor did not have any written comments, but was shared with
the Commission. Aerial photographs show some residential development to the
south/southeast, with some industrial types of usage along N Bryant Blvd. The
Vision Plan map calls for "commercial" usage at this location. The zoning is a
large R&E zoning classification, with ML zoning to the south/southwest. The
Vision Plan map calls for "rural" classification to the south/southeast,
immediately adjoining the site in question. The property is currently vacant. The
property has an empty storage shed, but is otherwise vacant. Residential
dwellings are located to the east, storage yards to the north, and pastureland
surrounds the subject property. The property was annexed in 1949 and has
remained relatively unchanged since the 1970s. The Vision Plan map shows
that the area is not projected to change from the current character of rural.
The applicable regulations were reviewed with the Commission - Ms. Johnston
explained that the requested zoning of CH allows for unlimited outdoor storage,
and explained that the intent of R&E is to remain relatively low in intensity. She
then reviewed the intent statement for the CH district and explained that the two
are incompatible. She also reviewed several excerpts from the Comprehensive
Plan that are relevant and provide guidance. CH districts can bring in heavier
traffic than roads that are in place can sustain or were intended for. The
surrounding uses are predominantly rural, and while this lot is labeled as
"commercial" in the Vision Plan, and this proposed use is commercial - the
proximity to the rural areas does not make it the best choice for a type of
commercial. The Zoning Ordinance classifies an animal crematorium as an
"industrial service". CH is one of the least compatible types of commercial for
something next to a rural area. For example, the Comprehensive Plan calls for
elimination of CG/CH next to neighborhoods - and this requested zone is
actually more intensive than CG/CH. The proposed change would not be an

142. appropriate development pattern. R&E allows for the least environmental
impact, whereas the CH zoning allows for high environmental impact.
The Chair summarized that a crematorium is allowed in CH zoning, but that CH
zoning is not appropriate where the property is located.
The proponent, Julie Snider, came forward to speak in favor of the request. She
also owns the property next door. She explained that there is some industrial
usage that has begun taking place just north of the property, and then she talked
about understanding what the use entails, and explaining that to the
Commission. Sebastian Guerrero asked if she had experience in this type of
usage, and she explained that she's learning about it as she goes, but can't
move forward until she understands if the zoning approval is in place. There
were some questions about the type of regulation that is in place for this type of
usage and the environmental conditions.
Jennifer Boggs spoke about the need for this type of usage for the community.
There was a great deal of discussion about the actual type of effects that are
produced by this type of endeavor, and Ms. Fawver explained that the Planning
Commission could also modify the request - for example, to a CG zoning district
- and pursue approval of a Conditional Use by the Planning Commission in
order to put together some conditions of approval that could help mitigate the
transition, helping to provide a more natural type of transition and minimize
effects.
There was no one else present to speak in favor or in opposition to this request.
Motion, to recommend approval of a modification to a CG zoning to the City
Council, (a lesser zoning category and thus allowed as a modification) and for
staff to bring back an application for Conditional Use for "Industrial Services" to
the Commission for consideration, was made by Jennifer Boggs and seconded
by Joe Grimes. The motion passed unanimously, 6-0.

143. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A
ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT : 4126 Lake Drive, located approximately 100 feet from
the intersection of Lake Drive and North Bryant Boulevard; more specifically
occupying the Short George Addition, Blocks 9 and 10, 180’ x 484’ tract less
the southwest 0.1020 acre, changing the zoning classification from Ranch &
Estate (R&E) to a General Commercial (CG) District; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
RE: Z 12-15: Julie Snider
WHEREAS, the applicant seeks to develop the property in accordance with the
city's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
WHEREAS the applicant seeks to market the property and bring business to San
Angelo through zoning the property in accordance with the plans and policies of the city for
the types of businesses that are allowed in an industrial area.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing
body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with
reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication
and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and
in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out
herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted
by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is
hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally
and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: : 4126
Lake Drive, located approximately 100 feet from the intersection of Lake Drive and North
Bryant Boulevard; more specifically occupying the Short George Addition, Blocks 9 and 10,
180’ x 484’ tract less the southwest 0.1020 acre shall henceforth be permanently zoned as
follows: General Commercial (CG) District.
The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the
Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.

144. SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described
property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.
SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:
SEVERABILITY:
The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any
portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity
of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and,
upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a
separate offense.
INTRODUCED on the 4th day of December, 2012 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND
ADOPTED on this the 18th day of December, 2012.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

145. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: November 26, 2012
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Shawn Lewis, Director of Community and Economic Development
Subject: Agenda Item for December 4, 2012 Council Meeting
Contact: Shawn Lewis, 657-4210
Caption: Regular Agenda Item
Consideration and possible action regarding a recommendation by the City of
San Angelo Development Corporation to approve and execute the lease
“substantially in the form of the attached draft” document between COSADC and
ASU Small Business Development Center in the Business Resource Center at
69 North Chadbourne.
Summary: ASU SBDC requires a lease to occupy space in the Business Resource
Center. ASU SBDC will move into the BRC once the lease is approved
and signed. The City Legal staff and Texas Tech Legal have drafted a
lease for space. See attached lease agreement.
History: ASU SBDC requires a lease for office space that it occupies. ASU/Texas Tech
Legal staff and City Legal staff drafted a lease agreement for the space.
Financial Impact: None
Related Vision Item N/A
(if applicable):
Other Information/ Staff recommends approval as presented
Recommendation:
Attachments: Lease agreement approved by COSADC
Presentation: Shawn Lewis, Director of Community and Economic Development
Publication: N/A
Reviewed by Shawn Lewis, ext 1541
Director:
Approved by Legal:
Dan Saluri
Adopted: 5/30/03
Revised: 6/21/10

146. LEASE AGREEMENT
LESSOR: City of San Angelo Development Corporation, a Texas non-profit development corporation.
LESSEE: Angelo State University, a member of the Texas Tech University System.
LEASED PREMISES: Business Resource Center 69 North Chadbourne Street, San Angelo, Texas
76903-5848. Suites 102.0 through 102.10
REFERENCE DATA
Commencement Date: December 10, 2012
Building Name: Business Resource Center
Leased Premises Address: 69 North Chadbourne Street, San Angelo, Texas 76903-5848 Suites 102.0
through 102.10
Lessor: City of San Angelo Development Corporation
Address: 72 West College, San Angelo, Texas 76903
Lessee: Angelo State University, member Texas Tech University System
Address: Facilities Planning and Construction ASU Station #11011, San Angelo, Texas 76909-1011
Total Leasable Area in Leased Premises: 2516 square feet (approx.)
Estimated Commencement Date: December 20, 2012
Estimated Termination Date: Terminates on August 31, 2013, but may renew annually until August
31,2016
Term of Lease: As long as Four (4) years (with yearly auto renewal & funding out clauses)
Annual Rent - 1st Year: $19,988.00, prorated by day for year 1
Security Deposit: N/A
Use of Leased Premises: Office space for operation of Small Business Development Center
Exhibits: The exhibits marked in this section are incorporated in this Lease by reference hereto and are to
be construed as part of this Lease Agreement.
X Exhibit "A" - Legal Description
X Exhibit "B" - MOU
X Exhibit "C" – Special Provisions
Page 1 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

147. TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. TERM OF LEASE .................................................................................................................... 3
2. RENT ........................................................................................................................................ 3
3. PAYMENT OF RENT .............................................................................................................. 3
4. SERVICES BY LESSOR.......................................................................................................... 4
5. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS .......................................................................................... 4
6. COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................... 4
7. TAXES ...................................................................................................................................... 4
8. INSURANCE ............................................................................................................................ 4
9. SECURITY ............................................................................................................................... 5
10. ALTERATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 5
11. ACCEPTANCE OF PREMISES ............................................................................................ 5
12. USE OF LEASED PREMISES ............................................................................................... 5
13. LESSOR'S RIGHT OF ENTRY ............................................................................................. 6
14. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING .................................................................................... 6
15. SURRENDER AND HOLDING OVER ................................................................................ 6
16. DESTRUCTION OF LEASED PREMISES........................................................................... 6
17. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY .............................................................................. 7
18. SALE OR ASSIGNMENT BY LESSOR ............................................................................... 7
19. DEFAULT BY LESSEE ......................................................................................................... 8
20. REMEDIES BY LESSOR ...................................................................................................... 8
21. EXAMINATION NOT OPTION............................................................................................ 9
22. DAMAGE ............................................................................................................................... 9
23. REMEDIES BY LESSEE ....................................................................................................... 9
24. WAIVER OF DEFAULT........................................................................................................ 9
25. BINDING EFFECT................................................................................................................. 9
26. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION ........................................................................................... 10
27. CONDEMNATION .............................................................................................................. 10
28. USE OF LANGUAGE .......................................................................................................... 10
29. NOTICES .............................................................................................................................. 10
30. CAPTIONS ........................................................................................................................... 11
31. REMOVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND FIXTURES ............................................................... 11
32. FORCE MAJEURE............................................................................................................... 11
33. SIGNS ................................................................................................................................... 11
34. ENTIRE AGREEMENT ....................................................................................................... 12
2|Page

148. LEASE AGREEMENT
This Lease Agreement is made by and between the City of San Angelo Development Corporation, a
Texas Nonprofit Development Corporation (Lessor) and Angelo State University a member of the Texas
Tech University System (Lessee) on the Execution Date stated in the REFERENCE DATA, which
REFERENCE DATA is attached to and made a part hereof for all purposes.
W I T N E S S E T H:
Lessor does hereby lease to Lessee and Lessee accepts from Lessor the Leased Premises, located at the
address specified in the REFERENCE DATA and hereinafter called the "Leased Premises", subject to the
covenants, terms, provisions, and conditions of this Lease Agreement. The legal description of the real
estate on which the building in which the Leased Premises is located (the “Building”) is attached hereto
as Exhibit "A".
1. TERM OF LEASE
This Lease Agreement shall begin on the Commencement Date, and shall end on August 31, 2013, except
that it shall automatically renew for three (3) additional one year terms if neither party objects at least
thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of a term. In any case, this Lease Agreement shall not extend
beyond August 31, 2016. This Lease Agreement may terminate on an earlier date pursuant to any of the
other conditions or provisions of this Lease Agreement.
2. RENT
Lessee agrees to pay to Lessor, without demand therefor and without any deduction or offset whatsoever,
an annual rent payment payable in advance during the full term of this Lease Agreement. First year rent
payment is prorated due and payable within 30 days of the Commencement Date. Thereafter annual rent
shall be due and payable on or before October 1st for each fiscal year of the term of this Lease or any
extensions thereof. The Lessee shall have the right to cancel this contract at the end of the then current
fiscal period (September 1 to August 31) if funds are not allotted for the next fiscal year to continue this
contract. The Lessee may enact such cancellation by giving the Lessor written notice of its intention to
cancel not less than thirty (30) days prior to the end of the then current fiscal period, stating its reasons
for cancellation. Upon cancellation of this contract as provided in this section, the Lessee shall not be
responsible for the payment of any services received which occur after the end of the current contract
period.
3. PAYMENT OF RENT
All rent hereunder shall be paid by check to the Landlord at the address shown at Paragraph 29,
NOTICES, of this Lease Agreement, or to such other place as Lessor may from time to time designate in
writing; provided, however, all rent must be actually received by Lessor on or before its due date.
Page 3 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

149. 4. SERVICES BY LESSOR
Lessor agrees to furnish to the Leased Premises during reasonable hours of generally recognized business
days, heating and cooling required for the normal office use and occupation of the Leased Premises.
Lessee requires 24/7 access to leased space and common areas. Lessor shall make water, gas, electric,
and sewer utilities available to the Leased Premises. Failure to any extent to furnish these services
resulting from causes beyond the control of Lessor shall not render Lessor to be in default hereof,
however occurring, nor relieve Lessee from any of Lessee's obligations under this Lease Agreement.
5. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS
Lessor shall keep and repair the interior and exterior of the Leased Premises, including all paving,
parking areas, exterior landscaping and exterior lighting associated with the Leased Premises, unless the
need for such repair shall have been caused by the negligence or misconduct of Lessee or Lessee's
employees, agents, or invitees. Lessor shall not be required to pay for any charges made for repair of the
Leased Premises authorized by Lessee without notice to and prior approval of Lessor in writing and
Lessor shall not have any liability for damage or injury arising out of any occurrence causing a need for
such repair. Lessee hereby agrees to exercise all reasonable care to prevent damage to the Leased
Premises. Lessor shall furnish janitorial services furnished by Lessor for the rest of the offices and
common areas of the building..
6. COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE
Lessor is responsible for all common area maintenance.
7. TAXES
Lessor shall pay and fully discharge all of the real estate ad valorem taxes on the Leased Premises. To
the extent that such taxes are applicable to Lessee as a tax-exempt entity, Lessee will pay all personal
property taxes and all real estate ad valorem taxes and assessments levied, assessed, or imposed upon all
improvements erected, installed or placed by Lessee on the Leased Premises.
8. INSURANCE
(a) Lessor shall at all times during the term of this Lease Agreement carry fire and extended
coverage insurance on the Building for not less than eighty percent (80%) of the replacement
cost of said improvements. Lessor shall not be required to insure and shall not be liable to
Lessee for any loss or damage to Lessee's property including, but not limited to, furniture,
fixtures, equipment and inventory and leasehold improvements added to the Leased Premises
by Lessee which may be caused by fire, wind, rain, flood, other unforeseen Acts of God, or
any other cause. Lessee is self-insured for liability purposes. Lessor shall not be responsible
or liable to Lessee for any loss or damage to person or property that Lessee may incur by or
through any act or failure to act of other tenants occupying any part of the building in which
the Leased Premises are located, or for any loss or damage to property that Lessee may incur
arising from bursting or leaking of water, gas, or sewer pipes, or for any damage or loss of
property within the premises from any other reason whatsoever, except if caused by the
negligence of the Lessor, or its agents or employees.
4|Page

150. (b) Lessee, during all times that this Lease Agreement is in effect, shall maintain self insurance
(or purchase insurance, at Lessee’s sole discretion) at Lessee’s expense as follows:
(i) For general liability in an amount not less than statutory limits; and,
(ii) For property damage arising from and related to Lessee’s business operations and
contents on the Leased Premises.
9. SECURITY
To the extent allowed by Texas law, Lessor hereby disclaims, and Lessee hereby waives, any obligations
on the part of Lessor to provide security for the Leased Premises at any time. To the extent allowed by
Texas law, Lessee agrees that Lessor shall not be liable to Lessee or Lessee's employees, agents or
invitees, or to any other person whomsoever for any injury to person or damage to property on or about
the Leased Premises by reason of the absence and/or failure of security, and Lessee further agrees that the
provisions of Paragraph 17, HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY, shall apply with respect to any
claim, damage, cost and/or expense asserted against or incurred by Lessor and arising from the absence
and/or failure of security for the Leased Premises insofar as Texas law allows.
10. ALTERATIONS
Lessee may not make any alteration to the Leased Premises. If Lessor, in Lessor's sole discretion,
approves any alteration to the Leased Premises, except as agreed otherwise in writing by Lessor, all
alterations shall at once become a part of the realty and belong to Lessor, except movable furniture and
trade fixtures. Lessee shall keep the Leased Premises in good condition, and shall, at the expiration or
termination of this Lease Agreement, deliver the Leased Premises to Lessor in as good a condition as of
the date of possession, except for ordinary wear and tear, casualty and Lessor repairs.
11. ACCEPTANCE OF PREMISES
LESSEE ACCEPTS THE LEASED PREMISES AS IS AND WITHOUT WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, AS TO THE CONDITION OF THE PREMISES OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS THEREON,
INCLUDING WARRANTY OF HABITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE. To the
extent that a reasonable person could have discovered any defects or conditions to indicate to the
contrary, Lessee's taking possession shall be conclusive evidence that the Leased Premises was in good
order and satisfactory condition when Lessee took possession. Further, there was nothing in or about the
Leased Premises obviously dangerous to life, limb, or health, and, to the extent allowed by Texas law,
Lessee waives any claim for damages that may arise from defects of that character. No promise of
Lessor to alter, remodel, repair, decorate or improve the Leased Premises, and no representation
respecting the condition of the Leased Premises has been made by Lessor to Lessee other than as may be
contained herein or on the exhibits attached hereto.
12. USE OF LEASED PREMISES
Lessee shall use the Leased Premises for general office and educational purposes and for no other
purpose without the prior written consent of Lessor. Lessee, its employees, agents, or invitees, shall not
Page 5 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

151. do or permit anything to be done in or about the Leased Premises which in any way will injure the
reputation or appearance of the Leased Premises. Lessee shall not cause, maintain or permit any nuisance
in, on, or about the Leased Premises. Lessee shall not conduct any business in the Leased Premises
except that essentially connected with the stated use of the Leased Premises in the REFERENCE DATA.
13. LESSOR'S RIGHT OF ENTRY
The parties hereto agree that Lessor, its agents or representatives, shall have the right, without abatement
of rent, to enter upon the Leased Premises to examine the Leased Premises, improve or repair the Leased
Premises, provide services required of Lessor, or to make such repairs or alterations to Leased Premises
as may be necessary for the safety and preservation of said Leased Premises. Such examinations, repairs,
and alterations, except those of an emergency nature, shall be made so as to cause a minimum of
interference with Lessee's business conducted in the Leased Premises, and, to the maximum extent
possible, reasonable prior notice shall be provided to Lessee. For each of the aforesaid purposes, Lessor
shall, at all times, have and retain a key to unlock all of the doors in and to the Leased Premises.
14. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING
Lessee may not assign this Lease Agreement or any interest herein, nor sublet the Leased Premises nor
any part thereof nor any right or privilege pertinent thereto. If Lessor, in Lessor's sole discretion,
approves a transfer, assignment or sublease, each transferee, assignee or sublessee must assume in
writing all of Lessee's obligations under this Lease Agreement, and Lessee shall remain liable for each
and every obligation hereunder. In the event Lessee assigns or sublets any portion of the Leased
Premises without the prior written approval of Lessor, Lessee shall be deemed to be in default of this
Lease Agreement and Lessor shall have all remedies provided in this Lease Agreement.
15. SURRENDER AND HOLDING OVER
Lessee, upon expiration or termination of this Lease Agreement, either by lapse of time or otherwise,
agrees to surrender peaceably the Leased Premises to Lessor. In the event that Lessee shall fail to
surrender the Leased Premises as provided above, such holding over shall be construed as tenancy from
month to month upon the other terms and conditions as set out herein, and Lessee shall pay Lessor as rent
twice the most recent monthly rental paid prior to the date of such termination.
16. DESTRUCTION OF LEASED PREMISES
In the event the Leased Premises is damaged by fire or other casualty, Lessor shall forthwith repair the
same provided such repairs to the Leased Premises can normally be made within sixty (60) days from the
date of the casualty. This Lease Agreement shall remain in full force and effect except that Lessee shall
be entitled to a proportionate abatement in rent, unless such damage or casualty resulted from the
negligence or other act of Lessee or its agents, licensees, invitees or employees, from the date of such
damage and while such repairs are being made, such reduction to be determined by Lessor based pro rata
on the extent to which the damage and the making of such repairs shall interfere with the use and
occupancy by Lessee of the Leased Premises. If such repairs cannot be made within sixty (60) days,
Lessor shall have the option by written notice given at any time within thirty (30) days after such
damage, of terminating this Lease Agreement as of the date specified in such notice, which date shall not
be less than thirty (30) days nor more than sixty (60) days after the giving of such notice. In the event of
6|Page

152. the giving of such termination notice, rent, proportionately abated as specified above, shall be paid by
Lessee only through the specific termination date provided for in the notice, Lessor agreeing to refund to
Lessee any rent theretofore paid in advance for any period of time subsequent to such date. In the event
Lessor does not exercise the above set forth option to terminate this Lease Agreement shall continue in
full force and effect, but the rent hereunder to be proportionately abated as provided above. Lessor shall
not be required to repair or replace any property or improvements installed in the Leased Premises by
Lessee. The foregoing notwithstanding, Lessor shall not be required to expend in repairing and restoring
the Leased Premises any amount in excess of the insurance proceeds received by Lessor for such damage
or casualty which are allocable to the Leased Premises.
17. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY
To the extent allowed by Texas laws and constitution of the State of Texas, Lessor shall not be liable to
Lessee or Lessee's employees, agents or invitees, or to any other person whomsoever for any injury to
person or damage to property on or about the Leased Premises caused by or arising out of the negligence,
misconduct, other acts or omissions of any person other than Lessor; the Leased Premises becoming out
of repair; the lack of supervision or security for the Leased Premises; the management of Lessee's
business in the Leased Premises; or the breach on the part of Lessee of any term or condition of this
Lease Agreement. Only insofar as Texas laws and constitution of the State of Texas allows, Lessee
agrees to indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from and against any and all liability and claims for any
and all such injury or damage, including reasonable attorney's fees for the defense thereof. Only insofar
as Texas law allows, in case of any action or proceeding brought against Lessor by reason of any such
claim, Lessee covenants and agrees to defend such action or proceeding by legal counsel appointed by
Lessee, and shall indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from any liability costs, expenses, judgment, or
other loss arising out of any such action or proceeding.
18. SALE OR ASSIGNMENT BY LESSOR
In the event of a sale or conveyance by Lessor of the Leased Premises, provided the successor owner
agrees in writing to assume all of Lessor's obligations under this Lease Agreement, the same shall operate
to release Lessor from any future liability under this Lease Agreement to Lessee, and Lessee agrees,
following such a sale or conveyance to look solely to the successor owner for performance of all the
covenants and obligations of Lessor under this Lease Agreement. This Lease Agreement shall not
otherwise be affected by any such sale or conveyance. Lessee agrees to attorn to the successor owner.
Lessee agrees that Lessor may assign all of its rights as Lessor under this Lease Agreement only if each
transferee or assignee assumes in writing all of Lessor’s obligations under this Lease Agreement, unless
otherwise agreed in writing by Lessor and Lessee prior to such assignment. Lessee further agrees to give
such further evidence of Lessee's consent to such assignment as may be reasonably requested by Lessor
or by Lessor's assignee.
Page 7 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

153. 19. DEFAULT BY LESSEE
Lessee shall be in default under this Lease Agreement if any of the following occur:
(a) Lessee shall fail to pay when due any rent or other sum of money required to be paid to Lessor
pursuant to the terms of this Lease Agreement.
(b) Lessee shall fail to comply with any material term or condition of this Lease Agreement other
than the payment of any rent or other sum as described in subparagraphs (a) hereinabove. Lessor
agrees to give Lessee notice of any such failure and a reasonable time to cure such failure,
generally no less than thirty (30) days, before declaring Lessee in default under this Lease
Agreement if such notice and reasonable time can be given without prejudice to the protection of
Lessor's rights hereunder.
20. REMEDIES BY LESSOR
(a) Should Lessee default under, or fail to perform, any provision of this Lease Agreement, Lessor
may at its option do any one or more of the following, insofar as Texas law allows:
i. Terminate this Lease Agreement and Lessee shall immediately surrender the Leased Premises
to Lessor. In the event Lessor elects to terminate this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall be liable
to Lessor for all rentals and sums due for the remaining term of this Lease Agreement, all of
which shall be immediately due and payable.
ii. Lessor may relet the Leased Premises or any part thereof for all or any part of the remainder
of said term of this Lease Agreement to a part satisfactory to Lessor, and at such monthly
rental as Lessor may with reasonable diligence secure. Lessee shall pay to Lessor upon
demand all expense of reletting, and shall pay to Lessor upon demand the amount of the total
projected deficiency for the remaining term of this Lease Agreement should the total rental
provided for under the relet lease be less than the total rental Lessee was obligated to pay
under this Lease Agreement.
iii. Lessor may enter the Leased Premises by any lawful means without being liable for
prosecution or any claim for damages therefor and perform the obligations of Lessee under
this Lease Agreement, and Lessee agrees to reimburse Lessor upon demand for any expenses
incurred by Lessor in effecting compliance with Lessee's obligations.
(b) To the extent allowed by Texas law, Lessee agrees that Lessor shall not be liable for any damages
resulting to Lessee from Lessor’s election of any of the foregoing remedies. All rights and
remedies of Lessor under this Lease Agreement shall be cumulative and none shall exclude any
other right or remedy at law. Such rights and remedies may be exercised and enforced
concurrently and whenever and as often as the occasion therefor may arise.
8|Page

154. 21. EXAMINATION NOT OPTION
Submission of this instrument for examination or signature by Lessee does not constitute a reservation of
or option for lease and it is not effective as a lease or otherwise until execution and delivery by both
Lessor and Lessee.
22. DAMAGE
Lessor shall not be responsible or liable to Lessee for any loss or damage which may be caused by or
arising out of the acts or omissions of persons occupying other premises in the building, or, to the extent
allowed by Texas law, for any loss or damage resulting to Lessee or Lessee's property from bursting,
stoppage or leakage of water, gas, sewer or steam pipes.
23. REMEDIES BY LESSEE
In the event of any default by Lessor of any term or condition of this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall give
written notice to Lessor of such default in reasonable detail and Lessor shall have thirty (30) days to
commence to cure such default after receipt of written notice. If Lessor has not with reasonably diligence
and good faith commenced to cure said default within said thirty (30) days, Lessee may at its option
terminate this Lease Agreement.
24. WAIVER OF DEFAULT
No waiver of default of Lessee shall be implied, and no express waiver shall affect any default other than
the default specified in such waiver and that only for the time and to the extent herein stated. The parties
hereby agree that no action by Lessor pursuant to Paragraph 23, REMEDIES BY LESSOR, or any other
paragraph of this Lease Agreement shall be deemed an acceptance by Lessor of Lessee's surrender of the
Leased Premises, thereby relieving Lessee of any liability hereunder.
25. BINDING EFFECT
This Lease Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the representatives, successors
and assigns, of the parties. Each person, corporation or other legal entity which is authorized by Lessee
to conduct any business or other operations on the Leased Premises, either as a transferee, assignee,
sublessee, licensee, invitee or otherwise, shall be liable for all of Lessee's obligations under this Lease
Agreement and shall have assumed all such obligations by virtue of having conducted any business or
other operations on the Leased Premises. Each of the persons executing this Lease Agreement on behalf
of Lessee hereinbelow is executing this Lease Agreement not only on behalf of the named Lessee but
also on behalf of and as an authorized agent of any other person, corporation or other legal entity
described in the preceding sentence.
Page 9 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

155. 26. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION
The parties hereto agree that with respect to damage from fire or other casualty or events, the risk of
which are insurable under standard insurance policies, no insurer of either party hereto against such risk
or damage covering the Leased Premises shall have a right of subrogation against the other party, their
officers, directors, employees or agents, and both parties hereto release and waive any right to recover
from said person for any damage covered by such insurance. Such waiver shall stand mutually
terminated as of the date either party notifies the other party in writing of the termination of each waiver.
Each party shall notify its respective insurer of such waiver of subrogation and this provision shall remain
in effect so long as such provision does not invalidate insurance coverage or prevent insurance coverage
provided for in this Lease Agreement.
27. CONDEMNATION
If all or any substantial part of the Leased Premises shall be taken or appropriated by any public or quasi-
public authority under the power of eminent domain, or conveyance in lieu thereof, Lessor shall give
Lessee notice thereof and thereafter have the right, at its option, to terminate this Lease Agreement as of
the date possession is taken hereunder. If the taking of a sufficient or a certain portion of the Leased
Premises renders the balance of the Leased Premises inadequate for the operation of Lessee's business at
the Leased Premises, Lessee shall have a right to terminate this Lease Agreement upon written notice to
Lessor not later than thirty (30) days from the date such possession is to be taken, said termination to be
effective as of the date possession is to be taken.
The entire compensation awarded to Lessor by reason of said eminent domain proceedings shall belong
to Lessor without any deduction therefrom for any present or future estate or interest of Lessee.
In the event of a partial taking of the Leased Premises, if this Lease Agreement is not terminated, Lessor
at its expense shall restore any damage to the Leased Premises as a result of the taking, and the rent and
any other sums payable by Lessee to Lessor shall be reduced by the percentage that the area of the
Leased Premises taken bears to the area of the entire Leased Premises prior to the taking.
28. USE OF LANGUAGE
Words of any gender used in this Lease Agreement shall be held and construed to include any other
gender, and words in the singular shall be held to include the plural unless the context otherwise requires.
29. NOTICES
All provisions for notice of any kind under this Lease Agreement shall be deemed sufficient notice if: (a)
such notice to Lessee is in writing addressed to Lessee's address indicated in the REFERENCE DATA, or
the last known post office address of Lessee and deposited in the United States mail by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and (b) such notice to Lessor is in writing
addressed to Lessor's address indicated in the REFERENCE DATA, or at such other address as Lessor
may notify Lessee in writing and deposited in the United States mail by registered or certified mail,
return receipt requested, with postage prepaid.
Notice shall be deemed given when mailed in accordance with the provisions of this Lease Agreement.
10 | P a g e

156. 30. CAPTIONS
The captions or headings of paragraphs in this Lease Agreement are inserted for convenience only, and
shall not be considered in construing the provisions hereof if any question of intent should arise.
31. REMOVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND FIXTURES
Lessee shall have the right to remove from the Leased Premises signs, shelving, and other fixtures and
equipment which have been installed upon the Leased Premises by Lessee, provided that Lessee is not in
default under any of the terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement, and that Lessee shall repair any
damage caused by removal of its property so as to restore the Leased Premises in the same or similar
condition as provided in Paragraph 11, ALTERATIONS, hereof. The foregoing notwithstanding, Lessee
shall not have the right to remove from the Leased Premises any item or items built and/or purchased by
Lessee in whole or in part with funds provided by Lessor whether such funds are provided as a finish-out
allowance under this agreement or otherwise; interior partitioning, wall coverings, floor and floor
coverings, ceilings, lighting fixtures, heating and air conditioning and ventilating equipment and any
other electrical, mechanical, plumbing or other similar items which would be used in the general
occupancy of the Leased Premises; or any item or items used in lieu of permanent wall coverings, ceiling
coverings and/or floor coverings, including, but not limited to, such items as wall cabinets or shelving
which do not have built-in wall coverings behind them and built-in units which do not have permanent
floor coverings below them.
32. FORCE MAJEURE
Neither party shall be required to perform any term, condition or covenant of this Lease Agreement so
long as such performance is delayed or prevented by force majeure which shall mean acts of God, strikes,
lockouts, shortage of material or labor restrictions by any governmental authority, civil riot, floods, and
any other cause not reasonably within the control of the party affected by the force majeure, and which,
by the exercise of due diligence, that party is unable wholly or in part to prevent or overcome.
33. SIGNS
Lessee will install sign on exterior of building near entrance per SBDC cooperative agreement. See
Special Provisions Exhibit “C”
Page 11 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

157. 34. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Lease Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes any
prior understandings or written or oral agreements between the parties respecting the Leased Premises.
No amendment, modification or alteration of the terms hereof shall be binding unless the same is in
writing dated subsequent to the date hereof and duly executed by the parties hereto. If Lessor is a
partnership (general or limited) or corporation, no partner, director, officer, stockholder or other
individual associated with said Lessor shall be personally liable for any of Lessor's obligations or
covenants hereunder to the extent allowed by Texas law. Each Lessee signing this Lease Agreement, if
more than one, is jointly and severally liable for all of Lessee's obligations under this Lease Agreement,
insofar as Texas law allows.
NEITHER THE EXECUTION OF THIS CONTRACT BY LESSEE NOR ANY OTHER CONDUCT
OF ITS REPRESENTATIVES RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A
WAIVER OF LESSEE’S SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY TO SUIT
EXECUTED on the Execution Date indicated in the REFERENCE DATA.
LESSOR: LESSEE:
City of San Angelo Development Angelo State University, member TEXAS
Corporation TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
By: By:
Printed Name: Printed Name:
Title: Title:
12 | P a g e

158. EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Being that certain tract of land described in Warranty Deed recorded in Instrument Number
699748 Official Public Records of Tom Green County, Texas, also being 0.3407 acres
(14,840 square feet) out of Acre Lots 15 and 16 of the Miles Addition to the City of San
Angelo, and being 0.3111 acres (13,553 square feet) also being all of Lots 8 through 10 and
the South 17.6 feet of Lot 11, W.C. Johnson’s Subdivision of a part of Acre Lots 5 and 6, of
the Miles Addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County Texas.
Suites 102.00 through 102.10.
Page 13 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

159. COPY
EXHIBIT "B"
MOU
MEMORANDUM O F UNDERSTANDING BY A N D B E T W E E N THE CITY OF SAN
ANGELO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (COSADC), OPERATOR OF THE BUSINESS
RESOURCE CENTER(BRC), AND THE ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY SMALL BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT CENTER (ASU SBDC) RELATING TO OCCUPANCY OF T H E B R C
F A C I L I T Y . THE AGREEMENT R ELATES TO THE B U D G E T CONTRIBUTIONS,
OPERATIONAL RESPNSIBILITIES, AND SPACE OCCUPIED DURING FISCAL YEAR
2012-2013.
(SEPTEMBER 1 TO AUGUST 31)
WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo Development Corporation is a Texas n on-­ profit
development corporation organized pursuant to the Texas Development Corporation Act
for purposes of promoting the development of new and expanding enterprises which create or
retain jobs; and,
WHEREAS, the Angelo State University Small Business Development Center (ASU
SBDC), a partnership with the Small Business Administration, provides small businesses in the
Concho Valley with business advising and training services; and,
WHEREAS, ASU SBDC, (A BRC Partner ) shares a common goal with the COSADC
and other BRC Partners (Concho Valley Center for Entrepreneurial Development,
Downtown San Angelo, Inc., San Angelo Chamber of Commerce and the Concho Valley Workforce
Development Board) to promote economic development in the /City and Concho Valley and has
determined that locating offices together in the BRC will facilitate the effective and efficient
delivery of the services offered by each to the community; and,
WHEREAS the ASU SBDC desires to enter into this MOU as a BRC Partner and to lease
space in the BRC;
NOW, THEREFORE, the COSADC and ASU SBDC enter into the following
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and agree as follows:
1. Incorporation of Recitals. The foregoing recitals are in all things approved and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth.
2. Operation of t h e B u s i n e s s Resource Center. COSADC owns and will be
responsible for the development, operation and maintenance of the Business Resource
Center office building located at 69 North Chadbourne Street, San Angelo, Texas.
14 | P a g e

160. 3. BRC Partner Office Space Leases. The ASU SBDC will negotiate and execute a lease
with the COSADC for office space within the BRC as designated by COSADC for
conduct of the various economic development related services and programs offered by the
BRC Partners.
4. BRC Partner Tenant Responsibilities. The ASU SBDC will be responsible for
furnishing, equipping and staffing their office space for purposes of offering small business
development related services and programs of the nature referred to herein.
5. COSADC Landlord Responsibilities. The COSADC responsibilities as landlord will
include the providing of utilities, HVAC, trash removal from onsite exterior collection
facility, telecommunications infrastructure not dedicated to a tenant BRC Partner, and
security system for the BRC office building.
6. BRC Not a Partnership or Joint Venture. ASU SBDC will comply with the
provisions of the "BRC Concept of Operations" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made
a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth. The BRC is an office facility and will be
publicly i d e n t i f i e d and marketed as such by the parties, as distinguished from a
partnership or joint venture.
7. Insurance. It is the stated policy of the State of Texas not to acquire commercial general
liability insurance for torts committed by employees of the state who are acting within the
scope of their employment. Rather, third parties must look to the Texas Tort Claims Act for
relief with respect to property damage, personal injury, and death proximately caused by the
wrongful act or omission or negligence of an employee acting within his scope of
employment.
8. BRC Guiding Principles. Attached hereto as Exhibit "B," for all purposes as if fully
set forth herein, are the BRC Guiding Principles. The BRC Partners accept the BRC
Guiding Principles as stated or as they may be amended in the future by mutual agreement
of the COSADC and the BRC Partners including ASU SBDC. ASU SBDC shall maintain
a copy of the BRC Guiding Principles in their office space within the BRC accessible to
management employees of the ASU SBDC for reference and guidance for cooperation
among the ASU SBDC, the other BRC Partners and the COSADC.
9. Allocated S p a c e i n the BRC and Budget Contributions. The COSADC has
adopted a Space Occupied and Budget Maintenance and Operations Budget, setting
forth estimates for maintenance and operation of the facility and an allocation of
costs based upon anticipated dedicated and shared facility space for ASU SBDC and the
COSADC. The estimated budget and cost allocations are attached hereto as Exhibit
"C", and incorporated herein by reference thereto for all purposes as if fully set forth.
The space a n d budget allocations w i l l be reflected in the leases to be negotiated by and
between the COSADC and the ASU SBDC.
Memorandum of Understanding between COSADC and ASU SBDC
10. Status of Employees. The COSADC and ASU SBDC shall each retain
supervision and control of their own regular employees at all times during the term of
Page 15 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

161. this MOU and during the term of any lease agreement entered into by and between the
COSADC and ASU SBDC. The employees, agents or representatives of ASU
SBDC shall not be entitled to benefits conferred on the employees, agents or
representatives of any other BRC Partner or of the COSADC.
11. Term and Termination. The original term of this MOU commences on September 1, 2012,
and ends August 31, 2013. Thereafter, this MOU shall automatically renew on an annual
basis unless earlier terminated by either Party hereto upon 60 days written notice of intent to
terminate given to the other Party.
12. Execution. If the governing body of a Party is required to approve this MOU, it shall not
become effective until approved by the governing body of that Party. In that event, this MOU
shall be executed by the duly authorized officers of the Party as expressed in the approving
resolution or order of the governing body of said Party.
13. Assignment. A Party may not assign this MOU or any rights hereunder without prior
written, authorized consent of the other Party, which consent may be withheld upon the
mutual agreement of the remaining BRC Partners, including ASU SBDC, and COSADC.
14. No Rights in Third Parties, Applicable Law. Venue. This MOU is not intended to create
any legal rights enforceable by any third party against any Party hereto, nor is it intended to
waive any rights or defenses available to any Party hereto. This MOU shall be governed by
the laws of the State of Texas. Venue for any proceeding brought pursuant to this MOU
shall be in Tom Green County, Texas.
15. Entire Agreement. This MOU is the entire agreement between the Parties and
supersedes any and all prior agreements or understandings, either oral or in writing,
between the Parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and no other prior
agreement, statement, or promise relating to the subject matter of this MOU, which is not
contained herein, shall be valid or binding.
16. Binding Agreement. This MOU shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
Parties hereto and their respective successors, legal representatives, and assigns.
3
Memorandum of Understanding between COSADC and ASU SBDC
16 | P a g e

162. 17. Amendment. This MOU may only be amended by the mutual agreement of the
Parties hereto in writing signed by a duly authorized representative of each Party.
18. Severability. In any event that one or more of the provisions contained in this MOU
shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity,
illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions herein, and this
MOU shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had
never been contained herein.
19. Survival and Cumulative Enforcement of Rights. Those provisions of this MOU
which by their very nature extend beyond termination or expiration of this MOU shall
survive such termination or expiration. All rights for enforcement of this MOU shall be
construed and held to be cumulative, and no one of them shall be exclusive of the other;
and, COSADC and ASU SBDC shall have the right to pursue any one or all of such
remedies or any other remedy or relief which may be provided by law, whether or not
stated in this MOU. No waiver by a Party hereto of a breach of any of the covenants,
conditions, or restrictions of this MOU shall be construed or held to be a waiver of any
succeeding or preceding breach of the same or any other covenant, condition or restriction
contained herein.
20. Force Majeure. In the event that any Party hereto shall be prevented from
performing its duties under this MOU by an act of nature, by acts of war, riot, act of
terrorism, or civil commotion, by an act of State, by strikes, fire, flood, or by the
occurrence of any other event beyond the control of the Party, such non­ performance
by that Party shall not be considered a breach of this MOU.
21. Notice. Any notice to be given hereunder by any Party(s) to the other Party shall be in
writing and sent by first class U.S. mail, registered or certified, return receipt requested as
follows:
CITY OF SAN ANGELO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Attention: Board President
P.O. Box 1751
San Angelo, Texas 76902
With a copy to:
City Attorney's Office
P.O. Box 1751
San Angelo, Texas 76902
ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
CENTER
Attention: Dave Erickson, Director
ASU Station #10910-0910
San Angelo, Texas 76909-0910
Memorandum of Understanding between COSADC and ASU SBDC
Page 17 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

163. EXECUTED by the Parties hereto, each respective entity acting by and through its
duly authorized officer as required by law, in multiple counterparts each of which shall be
deemed to be an original, on the date specified.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BY: Larry Teague
ITS: President
DATE: April 30, 2012
ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY SMALL
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER
BY: Dr. Nancy Allen, Vice Provost
April 26, 2012
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM
Shawn Lewis, Director Dan T. Saluri, Sr. Asst. City Atty.,
Community & Economic Development For: Lysia H. Bowling, City Atty.
Memorandum of Understanding between COSADC and ASU SBDC
18 | P a g e

164. MOU
Exhibit A
BRC Concept of Operations
1. The COSADC and ASU SBDC agree that the COSADC or designated subset will own,
operate, and maintain the BRC building and provide all routine and emergency maintenance to
include HVAC equipment, security system, and the primary telecommunications infrastructure
that is not dedicated to any one BRC tenant.
2. The BRC will be marketed and operated as a facility, not an organization. Each
partner organization ("tenant") within the BRC facility will assist with marketing the BRC, to
include standardized information on web sites, brochures, and forms of other media
presentations. Partners will collaborate to plan and develop these standardized marketing
materials.
3. A dedicated main telephone line/number and fax number for the BRC facility will be
identified, installed, and published.
4. A dedicated email address for the BRC facility will be identified, installed, and
published. An example of that might be brcinfo@sanangelotexas.us.
5. BRC partner offices of ASU SBDC, CVCED, & COSADC will have its own (existing)
unique telephone number(s), fax number(s). Each partner will maintain their own email
addresses. Part time or occasional use partners will be on an extension of the BRC phone
number.
6. The main phone reception desk for the BRC will be normally staffed by an employee
of COSADC, although the main telephone line(s) may be transferred to other partner offices
due to vacation, illness, lunch, etc.
7. Data services and Internet access for the ASU SBDC will separated from other BRC
partners via a direct connection to the Angelo State University network.
Memorandum of Understanding between COSADC and ASU SBDC
Page 19 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

165. 8. Data services and Internet access for all other BRC partners other than ASU SBDC will be
routed through the COSADC server; however, individual partners such as the CVCED may be set up
on a unique VLAN.
9. Each BRC partner will provide their own furniture, computers, telephones, fax, and
multimedia equipment for their dedicated rooms. Telephones for "occasional use­ part time" offices will
(if possible) be purchased with COSADC funds.
10. Funding for audio visual equipment and furniture for common use Meeting room (103.0)
and common use Conference room (100.3) is intended to be purchased from a grant.
11. Common area IT connectivity such as Meeting room (103.0) and Conference room (100.3)
will be through COSADC server. Wi-Fi connectivity can be available through ASU Guest Wi-Fi
installed throughout the facility unless other WI-Fi connectivity is installed.
12. Meeting room (103.0) will be available to facility partners at no cost on a reservation basis.
All others will be charged a fee based on a yet to be determined fee schedule. For now, scheduled
meetings should be geared towards business development, economic development or workforce training
purposes. ASU SBDC will schedule Meeting room (103.0) as it will be the primary user. COSADC will
schedule the Conference room (100.3). Small Conference room (102.9) is in ASU SBDC dedicated
space and can be scheduled through the ASU SBDC.
Memorandum of Understanding between COSADC and ASU SBDC
20 | P a g e

166. MOU
Exhibit B
BRC Guiding Principles
Overview
The founding partners of the One Stop Shop Concept met in September of 2009 to
discuss the development of Guiding Principles for the Business Resource Center (BRC) facility.
Guiding principles are important to ensure that each partner organization (Partner) shares the
same views with respect to the BRC concept and acknowledges the independence of the various
organizations (Partners) and their individual programs and services. These Guiding Principles
form the foundation of cooperation among the Partners and are important to ensure that as staff
in various Partner positions change; new Partner representatives will understand the basis for the
BRC concept and agree to abide by these Principles and to ensure all organizations work for the
successful continuation of the BRC.
Guiding Principles
1) Facility. BRC is a facility that houses various economic development and business assistance
organizations, each organization being a separate and individual entity, while also a Partner.
a. Each BRC Partner voluntarily pledges to work cooperatively and
collaboratively for the betterment of economic development in San Angelo and
the Concho Valley region.
b. Each Partner is a separate and independent organization, each of which has
unique missions, procedures, policies, clients, and oversight entities.
c. BRC shall have a designated facility manager for administrating the leasehold-
related operations of the facility; however, no organization or person shall direct the
day-to-day activities, programs, or services of the Partner organizations housed in
the BRC. This does not apply to any pre-existing contractual agreements between
Partner organizations to the contrary. BRC Partners require unrestricted access to
the BRC facility, common areas and their respective operational areas.
d. BRC partners will share facility space, infrastructure, and services where
appropriate to insure budgetary operational efficiency.
Memorandum of Understanding between COSADC and A S U SBDC
Page 21 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

167. 2. Single Source. BRC Partners believe in a shared vision of a single-source facility for
clients needing economic development and business assistance.
a. Each BRC Partner has its unique strengths, programs and expertise. Each Partner
believes in avoiding duplication of efforts of other Partners.
b. Each BRC Partner will continue to service its regular clients and will decide when it is
necessary to bring together the other Partners. Partners will have the flexibility to work with their
own clients as they see fit.
c. BRC Partners will come together when necessary to ''triage" a client to determine and
provide the business assistance services required. This will also be true of those clients who walk in
the front door and do not have an appointment to meet with any particular Partner.
d. BRC Partners believe in a vision of efficiencies and shared costs whenever possible.
e. BRC Partners believe the multi-source/single-site concept will provide all clients with
access to the increased knowledge base of economic development assistance resulting from the co-
location of BRC Partners.
3. Measurement and ROI. BRC partners agree that they will participate in a shared
tracking, measurement and reporting system acceptable to the Partners that will demonstrate
outcomes of BRC assistance.
a. Each BRC Partner may have their own, separate client management system and shall
share non-confidential data for the purpose of BRC aggregate reporting and facilitating client
assistance, as each Partner's confidentiality policies allow.
b. BRC Partners will establish agreed-upon outcome, output, and efficiency
measurements, all of which may be quantitative as well as qualitative in nature.
c. BRC Partners will cooperate to develop the shared tracking, measurement, and
reporting system to ensure mechanisms are in place to capture the required information.
4. Marketing. BRC Partners will continue to market their own unique services and
programs independently of the BRC, and will also market the advantages of the BRC as a One-
Stop Shop location as appropriate.
a. BRC Partners will work together to market the facility and concept to the community
and targeted audiences.
Memorandum of Understanding between COSADC and ASU SBDC
22 | P a g e

168. b. As appropriate and allowable under Partner rules, regulations, and policies; BRC Partners
will include a reference to the BRC on marketing collateral, websites, and other promotional
materials.
5. Communication. BRC Partners believe regular communication among the Partners is critical to
ensure delivery of superior client assistance and customer satisfaction. The various Directors or designated
staff of the BRC Partners will meet on a regular basis to address shared client and programs issues and any
unanticipated facility issues. These will be meetings of equals working towards the success of the BRC and
the One-Stop Shop Concept.
MOU
Exhibit C
BRC
Space Occupied and Budget Contribution Detail
FY 2012-2013
Estimated
Area Annual
Occupied M&O
Organization (ft2) Room description(s) and number(s) Budget
Dedicated (Per BRC layout) Contribution
space (Per Budget
Contribution
Worksheet)
City of San Angelo Open office 101
Development 1623 sq ft Vesibule 101.3 $12,894
Corporation Workspace 101.5
Offices 101.1, 101.2,101.4, 101.9, 101.10
ASU SBDC 2516 sq ft Open office 102.0 $19,988
Offices/rooms 102.1 through 102.10
Open office 202
CVCED 2,716 sq ft Hall 201.1 $21,577
Offices 201.2 through 201.7
Workforce Board 150 sq ft Office 101.8 (in COSADC area) $1,192
Downtown San 150 sq ft Office 101.7 (in COSADC area) $1,192
Angelo
Chamber of
Commerce- 150 sq ft Office 101.6 (in COSADC area) $1,192
Economic
Development
Total dedicated 7,305
space- partners
Included in
partners
Common areas to 7,151 amounts
be used by all All other space- see Attachment C based on %
tenants sq ft of
dedicated
space
Page 23 of 25
COSADC/ASU Lease Agreement

169. MOU Exhibit C (continued)
Common Area Space Designations
1st Floor
Description Room number
1. Sprinkler- 103.2
2. Exterior Vestibule- 100.7.2
3. Vestibule 100.7.1
4. Corridors- 100.4 through 100.7
5. Storage- 103.1
6. Meeting- 103
7. Storage- 103.3
8. Janitor- 100.13
9. Women’s restroom- 100.11
10. Men’s restroom- 100.12
11. Electrical- 103.4
12. Lounge- 100.10
13. Electrical- 100.14
14. Stair- 100.9
15. Stair- 100.8
16. Electrical- 102.11
17. Lobby- 100
18. Conference (large)- 100.3
19. Elevator- 100.1
2nd Floor
1. Stair 2- 200.8
2. Stair 3- 200.9
3. Stair 1- 200.2
4. Elevator- 200.1
5. Elevator Mechanical- 201.7
6. Lobby- 200
7. Break room- 200.6
8. Men’s Restroom 200.5
9. Women’s Restroom 200.4
Memorandum of Understanding between COSADC and A S U SBDC
24 | P a g e

170. EXHIBIT "C"
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
1. Lessee requires eight dedicated parking spaces for Lessee staff in lot owned by Lessor at corner of First
Street and Chadbourne Street.
2. Lessee requires signage on front of building near the entrance per its cooperative agreement with lead
SBDC center. Signage and installation of such will be paid by Lessee. Signage will not be more than ten
(10) sq. ft. in size.
25

171. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: November 26, 2012
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO
Subject: Agenda Item for December 4, 2012 Council Meeting
Contact: Michael Dane, 657-4241
Caption: Discussion and Presentation of City’s Water Conservation Credit Program
Summary: City Ordinance currently provides that if a residential customer uses 3,000 gallons or less of
water in a month, they are eligible for a credit on their bill. The credit is equal to 10% of the customer’s base
and usage fees for water. The customer receives a credit on the following month’s bill.
This program was established in 2006.
Financial Impact: During FY 2012, 116,530 conservation credits were issued to customers totaling
$263,955.
Attachments: City Ordinance
Presentation: Attached.
Publication: None.
Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane, ACM/CFO, November 26, 2012.

172. Sec. 11.301 Water Rates
(a) All persons supplied with water by the city shall be billed for water so supplied at the rates set out
in the fee schedule found in Appendix A, Article 8.000 of this code for water billed on or after April 1,
2001.
(b) For residential water customers who use 3,000 gallons or less water per month, a ten percent
(10%) discount shall be applied to the base rate and usage levels for those months where water usage is
3,000 gallons or less. This discount shall be effective with the July 2006 billing cycle.
(Ordinance adopted 5/16/06)

173. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: 19 November 2012
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Robert Salas, Director, Neighborhood & Family Services
Subject: Agenda Item for December 4, 2012 Council Meeting
Contact: Robert Salas 657-4274
Caption: Regular
Consideration of approval and public hearing of the 2011 Consolidated Annual
Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary: The 2011 CAPER is a document required of all entitlement cities receiving annual
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) funds from
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
History: The CAPER is the City’s performance evaluation for the 2011 Program Year covering 1 Oct
2011 thru 30 Sep 2012. The CAPER includes a summary of expended resources, objectives and goals
as they relate to affordable housing, outcome measures, geographic distribution, and barriers to
affordable housing.
This report is the product of public outreach consistent with the City of San Angelo’s 2010-2014 Five-Year
Consolidated Plan. Public notices were posted in a newspaper article in the Standard Times and draft
copies of the CAPER were posted at various locations throughout the city.
Approval the 2011 CAPER will authorize the City to forward the final CAPER to the HUD Regional Office
in Ft Worth.
Financial Impact: None
Related Vision Item: Neighborhood Revitalization.
Other Information/Recommendations: Approve content and allow staff to forward to HUD.
Attachments: 2011 CAPER

174. Presentation: Powerpoint slides.
Publication: Standard Times advertisement.
Approval By Service Area Director: N/A.

175. CITY OF SAN ANGELO
2011 Program Year
Consolidated Annual Performance
&
Evaluation Report (CAPER)
NEIGHBORHOOD & FAMILY SERVICES DEPT
COMMUNITY & HOUSING SUPPORT DIVISION

176. Plan Preparation by:
Robert Salas, Director, Neighborhood & Family Services Department
Special Thanks to:
Mauri LC Rodríguez, Sr. Program Coordinator
Steve Díaz, Housing Rehab Coordinator
Chris Deanda, Special Projects Coordinator
City Council
Alvin New, Mayor
Paul Alexander, Council Member
Single Member District 1 Fredd Adams, Council Member
Dwain Morrison, Council Member Single Member District 4
Single Member District 2 Kendall Hirschfield, Council Member
Johnny Silvas, Council Member Single Member District 5
Single Member District 3 Charlotte Farmer, Council Member
Single Member District 6
2

177. TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
FUNDS RECEIVED/EXPENDED 4
GOALS & OBJECTIVES 6
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION 9
MONITORING 17
HOUSING 20
BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING 23
HOMELESS NEEDS 25
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 26
SECTION 108 LOANS 32
ANTI POVERTY STRATEGY 34
PERFORMANCE TABLES 35
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT CERTIFICATIONS 41
CDBG FINANCIAL SUMMARY 42
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT (HOME) 44
HOME MATCH REPORT 46
PR03 REPORT 47
2

178. First Program Year CAPER
GENERAL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) describes the activities
undertaken during the program year starting October 1, 2011 and ending September 30, 2012
using Federal funds granted to the City of San Angelo by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home
Investment Partnership (HOME). Activities and accomplishments described in this report
primarily benefit low-to-moderate income residents of the City of San Angelo, neighborhoods
with high concentrations of low-to-moderate income residents, and the city as a whole.
A complete draft of this report has been made available for public review and comment for a 15-
day period beginning November 20, 2012. The availability of the report has been publicly
advertised consistent with the provisions of San Angelo’s Consolidated Plan with printed copies
available at strategic locations throughout the city as specified in the Citizen Participation Plan.
The City of San Angelo continued to support multiple housing projects and programs for the
2011 CDBG and HOME program year to include Emergency Repair program for elderly and/or
disabled, housing rehabilitation, homebuyers’ assistance, and new construction programs.
Moreover, the City leveraged local funds to support first-time homebuyers with gap financing for
the purchase of new homes. The city did not fund public service projects this program year.
Success Stories
Neighborhood Blitz: Using CDBG and local funding, nearly 400 city workers and 450
community volunteers took part in the annual Neighborhood Blitz, which repaired and painted
homes and cleaned up the neighborhoods targeted for revitalization. The blitz, a part of the
City's Neighborhood Revitalization Program, was the fourth the city has hosted since 2009. A
total of 48 homes were repaired and painted, 11 of those 48 were funded with $66K of CDBG
funds
Affordable Housing Assistance Program thru Local ½ Cents Sales Tax: The City expended
$400K to support affordable housing via the local ½ cent sales tax program for new home
construction. This provided gap financing for 6 first-time homebuyers and 38 minor housing
repairs as part of the annual neighborhood blitz.
Funds Received
The table below outlines the Consolidated Plan funding received by the City of San Angelo
between October 1, 2011 and September 30, 2012. This table only includes new funds received
during the program year and does not account for unspent prior year funds spent during the
2011 program year.
3

179. 2011 Program Funds Available
CDBG HOME TOTAL
Federal Entitlement $808,977 $402,019 $1,210,996
Program Income $54,173 $30,734 $84,907
Total Funds Available $863,150 $432,753 $1,295,903
Funds Expended
The activities and accomplishments outlined in this document are based on the expenditure of
Federal funds between October 1, 2011 and September 30, 2012 as outlined below. Funds
expended during the program year include reprogrammed prior year funds and funds awarded
to activities in prior program years that were not spent until the 2011 program year.
Funds Expended in 2011
CDBG HOME TOTAL
Total Funds Expended 1,383,781.17 691,554.64 2,075,335.81
Administration Cap
CDBG HOME
Federal Entitlement $808,977 $402,019
Program Income $54,173 $30,734
Total $863,150 $432,753
Administrative Cap $172,630 $43,275
Administration Expended $171,956 $40,744
CHDO Set-aside
HOME Federal Entitlement $402,019
Minimum Required CHDO Set-Aside (15%) $60,302
Actual Amount Set-Aside $75,000
Public Service Cap
CDBG
CDBG Federal Entitlement $808,977
Prior Year Program Income $48,350
Total Subject to PS Cap $857,327
PS Obligations $0
% PS Expended 0%
4

180. GENERAL QUESTIONS
1. Assessment of the one-year goals and objectives:
a. Describe the accomplishments in attaining the goals and objectives for the reporting
period.
b. Provide a breakdown of the CPD formula grant funds spent on grant activities for each
goal and objective.
c. If applicable, explain why progress was not made towards meeting the goals and
objectives.
2. Describe the manner in which the recipient would change its program as a result of its
experiences.
3. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing:
a. Provide a summary of impediments to fair housing choice.
b. Identify actions taken to overcome effects of impediments identified.
4. Describe Other Actions in Strategic Plan or Action Plan taken to address obstacles to
meeting underserved needs.
5. Leveraging Resources
a. Identify progress in obtaining “other” public and private resources to address needs.
b. How Federal resources from HUD leveraged other public and private resources.
c. How matching requirements were satisfied.
1. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Administration not included.
Accomplishments for 2011
Projects Service Annual Goal Completed Funds
Provider Expended
CHS Homeowner Rehab
(includes neighborhood COSA CHS 42 Households rehabbed 44 $266,492
blitz)
CHS Emergency Repairs COSA CHS 40 Households assisted 68 $145,944
CHS Demolition COSA CHS 3 substandard structures 1 $3,006
COSA Code 2900 Code enforcement
Code Enforcement 5,081 $38,754
Enforcement actions
Dangerous Buildings COSA Fire 24 Substandard structures 506 assessed,
$15,201
Inspector Prevention processed for demo 15 demos
COSA CHS,
New/Reconstruction Galilee CDC 5 housing units built 6 $432,375
(CHDO)
Homebuyers Assistance COSA CHS 12 clients assisted 24 $162,547
Rental Assistance MHMR 22 clients assisted 21 $55,887
5

181. Under-performing Projects
Demolition goal of three was not met due to lack of citizen’s requests.
2. CHANGES TO THE PROGRAM
There were no major changes to the program during PY 2011.
3. AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING
The City of San Angelo adopted an ordinance on August 20, 1996, to encourage the opportunity
for each citizen to obtain housing without regard to race, color, sex, religion, national origin,
disability , or familial status in accordance with the National Fair Housing Act of 1968. This
ordinance, FAIR HOUSING, is codified in the San Angelo Code of Ordinances as Article 5.1000.
Additional authority for adoption of this ordinance is derived from the Texas Local Government
Code.
As part of the 5-year Consolidated Plan development, San Angelo conducted an Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. The study confirmed that the primary impediments to
housing choices in San Angelo are a family’s annual income and housing costs. Substandard
property maintenance in the lower income neighborhoods of San Angelo was also identified as
an impediment.
Extremely low income persons will have a difficult time finding affordable housing, defined as
housing that costs 30% or more of their gross income. Education and job training may provide
a way to higher income and better living conditions for some low income families. However,
elderly and disabled individuals are often unable to increase their income or improve their living
conditions through these means. In addition to inadequate income and credit worthiness, there
are other issues that may indirectly affect fair housing choices. A growing elderly population,
racial and ethnic divergences, and slow economic growth are examples.
Activities to address the impediment of affordability:
• $412K was expended to repair/rehabilitate existing homes through CDBG Emergency
and Home Rehabilitation programs to include the annual Neighborhood Blitz
• $432K to construct/reconstruct new homes providing loans and deferred loans (number
includes CHDO activities)
• The City expended $162K in HOME funds on closing cost and down payment for 24
first-time homebuyers
Activities to address the impediment of substandard property maintenance:
• One full time dangerous building inspector was funded by CDBG to assist the city in
identifying and processing substandard, dangerous buildings in need of demolition. 506
buildings were assessed and processed for demolition.
• The City provided one full time Code Enforcer funded by CDBG funds to monitor home
maintenance. 5081 code actions were taken to help maintain neighborhood standards.
6

182. 4. OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDERSERVED NEEDS
The City of San Angelo continues to support non-profit agencies, the local housing authority,
homeless providers and special needs groups in an effort to meet the needs of underserved
citizens. Additionally, the City provides technical assistance to providers in the pursuit of
federal, state, and other funding sources.
The major obstacle to meeting priority needs continues to be a lack of available funding.
Reductions in funding at all levels of government as well as declining donations to the not-for-
profit sector in recent years have severely restricted the ability of the City and its Subrecipients
to aggressively respond to underserved needs.
5. LEVERAGING RESOURCES
Public and Private Resources
Community & Housing Support leveraged other City departments in order to obtain operating
support to include financial, legal, planning, human resources, and purchasing. In addition,
residents of the Forest Park Duplexes funded with HOME funds and managed by CHS received
rental assistance from the Public Housing Authority. Community & Housing Support also
leveraged over $400K of local sales tax revenue for gap financing for low/moderate income first-
time homebuyers.
Home Match Requirements
The City of San Angelo complies with federal matching requirements for HOME. As of Sept 30,
2011, San Angelo maintained $1,982,676.28 in excess matching funds from prior years. This
reserve was more than adequate to meet the required match liability for the 2011 program year.
HOME Match Report, Form 40107-A, is provided later in this report.
MANAGING THE PROCESS
1. Describe actions taken during the last year to ensure compliance with program and
comprehensive planning requirements.
CAPER Managing the Process response.
The City of San Angelo employs two staff members that assist with the oversight and
compliance of Consolidated Planning projects. The project selection process for FY 2011 was
consistent with the City’s Five-Year Plan. During the selection process, activities were
evaluated based on a number of criteria including consistency with the priority needs identified
in the Five-Year Plan, as well as compliance with CDBG national objectives. Throughout the
reporting period, City staff monitored projects supported with federal funds to ensure
compliance with the program and comprehensive planning requirements.
In addition to monitoring for compliance, the City continues to improve internal record keeping
and budget management. Forms and spreadsheets are reviewed for usability and revised as
needed. Moreover, the City has revamped the internal budgeting process from having multiple
7

183. open accounts to having two open accounts: one for prior year funds and one for current
program year accounts.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
1. Provide a summary of citizen comments.
2. In addition, the performance report provided to citizens must identify the Federal funds
made available for furthering the objectives of the Consolidated Plan. For each formula
grant program, the grantee shall identify the total amount of funds available (including
estimated program income), the total amount of funds committed during the reporting
period, the total amount expended during the reporting period, and the geographic
distribution and location of expenditures. Jurisdictions are encouraged to include maps in
describing the geographic distribution and location of investment (including areas of minority
concentration). The geographic distribution and expenditure requirement may also be
satisfied by specifying the census tracts where expenditures were concentrated.
CAPER Citizen Participation Response:
1. CITIZEN COMMENTS
Public outreach was consistent with the City of San Angelo’s 2010-2014 Five-Year Consolidated
Plan. Public participation efforts included annual public meetings and hearings, discussions
with agencies and groups that provide services, assist and/or advocate for low-to-moderate-
income citizens. The public hearing for the CAPER was held on December 4, 2012 at the
McNeese Convention Center. No public comments were provided.
2. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION
The table below identifies the Census Tract Block Groups that make up at least 51% low/mod
income areas in the city and eligible for area benefit. Code enforcement, assessments of
dangerous buildings, and neighborhood revitalization projects were carried out exclusively in the
low/mod income census tracts. Data is from the 2000 census. Whenever possible, 2010 census
data was used as a source to identify demographic trends.
8

184. 9

185. Code Enforcement Low/Mod CTBGs
2000 Census CTBG
Census Tract Block Group Low/Mod
Total Pop. % of BG
(CT) (BG) Population
2 4 26 31 83.9
2 1 755 1085 69.6
2 3 577 1121 51.5
3 4 232 448 51.8
3 1 587 971 60.5
3 3 508 928 54.7
4 1 554 866 64.0
4 2 430 732 58.7
4 3 613 969 63.3
4 5 512 611 83.8
4 6 384 611 62.8
4 8 563 764 73.7
5 1 516 620 83.2
5 2 710 918 77.3
6 1 327 601 54.4
7 2 153 284 53.9
7 2 447 694 64.4
7 3 907 1162 78.1
7 4 661 947 69.8
7 5 591 859 68.8
8 3 652 1158 56.3
9 1 294 458 64.2
9 2 748 1080 69.3
9 3 386 500 77.2
9 4 422 665 63.5
11.01 1 451 707 63.8
11.02 1 343 644 53.3
11.02 6 495 962 51.5
12.00 1 489 955 51.2
13.01 1 635 841 75.5
13.01 2 30 31 96.8
13.03 2 431 782 55.1
13.04 3 444 652 68.1
13.04 4 441 787 56.0
14 1 885 1260 70.2
14 2 492 776 63.4
14 3 410 707 58.0
14 5 644 1180 54.6
Totals 18745 29367
Total Percentage 63.83%
10

186. Target Area projects consist of those projects conducted in four City Council designated areas
targeted for neighborhood revitalization: Rio Vista, Blackshear, Reagan, and Fort Concho. All
four target areas are designated as low/mod income census tracts. $530,857 of CDBG, HOME
funds (includes CHDO proceeds), and local funds were expended specifically in the target
areas.
Community-wide projects were directed toward low-to-moderate income persons and were
carried out throughout the city for low-to-moderate income citizens.
These projects were offered on a community-wide basis because, while there are distinct areas
with high concentrations of low-to-moderate income populations within the City, over the years
the low-to-moderate income population has spread throughout the community. This is
especially true for elderly and special needs residents. Out of fairness to all eligible low-to-
moderate income residents, these programs were offered on a city-wide basis.
Community-wide projects:
• MHMR TBRA Program
• Emergency Repairs Program
• Demolition
• CDBG Rehab Program
• HOME Homebuyers Assistance Program
11

187. 12

188. 13

189. 14

190. INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE
1. Describe actions taken during the last year to overcome gaps in institutional structures and
enhance coordination.
CAPER Institutional Structure response:
The City of San Angelo Community & Housing Support (CHS) Division acts as the primary
administrative agency for the Consolidated Plan programs. As part of this responsibility, CHS
consistently reviews the performance of subrecipients and monitors the overall program delivery
structure to ensure coordination and compliance.
Through past one-on-one subrecipient training to review program regulations and reporting
requirements for each the new program year, the City’s current subrecipients have obtained
extensive knowledge on program monitoring requirements. As a result of this training and
regular monitoring, compliance with regulations and reporting information has significantly
improved.
MONITORING
1. Describe how and the frequency with which you monitored your activities.
2. Describe the results of your monitoring including any improvements.
3. Self Evaluation
a. Describe the effect programs have in solving neighborhood and community problems.
b. Describe progress in meeting priority needs and specific objectives and help make
community’s vision of the future a reality.
c. Describe how you provided decent housing and a suitable living environment and
expanded economic opportunity principally for low and moderate-income persons.
d. Indicate any activities falling behind schedule.
e. Describe how activities and strategies made an impact on identified needs.
f. Identify indicators that would best describe the results.
g. Identify barriers that had a negative impact on fulfilling the strategies and overall vision.
h. Identify whether major goals are on target and discuss reasons for those that are not on
target.
i. Identify any adjustments or improvements to strategies and activities that might meet
your needs more effectively.
CAPER Monitoring Response:
1. MONITORING METHODS
Monitoring was conducted on a monthly basis for each subrecipient not only to verify that
reimbursements submitted were for eligible expenses, but also to verify that each subrecipient
was complying with all the requirements in their agreement. Each Reimbursement request was
verified for eligibility. Also, each of the participants in each program was examined to verify
their individual eligibility for assistance.
15

191. 2. MONITORING RESULTS
During program year 2011, all subrecipients were monitored monthly by Community & Housing
Support (CHS) staff prior to reimbursement. We did not discover a subrecipient that needed
assistance providing necessary documents and reports accurately and on a timely manner.
3. SELF EVALUATION
Consolidated Plan program funding continues to play a vital role in ensuring the sustainability
and operation of numerous programs and activities that have had a beneficial impact on San
Angelo’s neighborhoods and social problems. CDBG funding has brought new parks and play
structures, street improvements, and other new infrastructure to low-income neighborhoods,
enhancing the overall quality of life in these areas. HOME and CDBG funds have been used to
improve substandard housing, create new affordable housing occupied by low and moderate
income residents. HUD Federal funds have been vital to providing services for San Angelo’s
most vulnerable populations including child and adult care, counseling services, reduced
prescription drugs, youth employment and youth leadership programs. Most of these programs
and projects would not be possible without the assistance of these Federal funds. The specific
activities undertaken during the 2011 program year that address the needs identified as “high”
priorities in the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan are outlined below. Many activities address
multiple high priority needs.
Creating a Suitable Living Environment
• CHS funds were used to continue the demolition and removal of dilapidated structures
constituting spot slum/blight which were not economically feasible to rehabilitate. In
addition, the salary for a full time dangerous building inspector was paid using CDBG
funds.
• Funds were provided for the salary and benefits for a City of San Angelo Code
Enforcement Officer. This officer was assigned to enforce codes, such as junk, junk
vehicles, tall grass and weeds, junk appliances, refuse, unsightly material and temporary
signs, and related state laws in low/moderate income areas.
Expanded Economic Opportunities
• Through the continued funding of the Downtown Façade program with prior year funds,
several downtown businesses were provided funds to improve their places of business
which helped stimulate economic growth.
Providing Decent Housing
• Emergency Repair Program permitted a 100% grant for low/moderate income
homeowners for up to $5,000.00 to handle emergency situations or conditions that were
deemed detrimental to life, health, or safety and required immediate action.
• Housing Rehabilitation Program provided loans/grants to assist eligible low/moderate
income homeowners within the city limits of San Angelo for rehabilitation of homes in
need.
16

192. • Homebuyers Assistance Program provided down payment and closing cost assistance
to low/moderate income eligible.
• Tenant-based Rental Assistance (TBRA) provided rental assistance to clients with
chronic mental illness and clients made homeless due to domestic violence residing
within the San Angelo city limits over a period of a year.
Projects Falling Behind
This program year, the demolition program did not meet its goal due to lack of requests for
assistance from eligible homeowners. We will continue to provide the opportunity for
homeowners to submit requests for demolition in order to address slum and blight.
Barriers
CDBG and HOME funds have been steadily decreasing each year. Particularly in a fiscal
climate of dwindling resources at all levels of government and in the not-for-profit sector, it is
nearly impossible to completely “solve” many of the problems that plague low and moderate
income populations and neighborhoods. While the lives of many individual assisted residents
have been improved, some dramatically, new immigrant populations and others frequently
replace them with similar economic and social challenges. As housing and infrastructure are
improved in one area, benefiting many area residents, particularly long-time low-income
homeowners, increasing property values and rents force others to move to other housing or
neighborhoods with similar challenges to solve. Without additional funds, City efforts to
ameliorate the affordable housing dilemma will be minimized, albeit beneficial to those assisted.
Potential Adjustments and Improvements
The City of San Angelo awards CDBG and HOME funds annually through an open proposal
process. Staff from Community & Housing Support provides technical assistance and
recommendations to the City Council for consideration and approval of activities that should
receive funding each year. The technical assistance includes information about
accomplishments, timeliness, compliance, and effectiveness of the applicant agencies in their
current and past activities. Those that are found to be most effective tend to be rewarded with
new funding and funding is reduced or eliminated for activities and agencies which prove least
effective.
LEAD-BASED PAINT
1. Describe actions taken during the last year to evaluate and reduce lead-based paint
hazards.
CAPER Lead-based Paint Response:
1. ACTIONS TAKEN TO REDUCE LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS
The Housing Rehabilitation Program will adhere to the HUD Regulation on Lead-Based Paint
Hazards in Federally Owned Housing and Housing Receiving Federal Assistance, 24 CFR Part
35, Subpart J, that went into effect on September 15, 2000. Community & Housing Support
staff prepared and incorporated a chapter on Lead-Based Paint Hazards in its rehabilitation
program guidelines in 2010, which is applicable to both CDBG and HOME funded activities.
17

193. The CHS Housing Program Coordinator received Lead-based Paint Inspector training in 2005
and was certified by the State in order to carry out the required lead-based paint inspections.
He subsequently, received and was certified as a Risk Assessor. Testing equipment was
purchased and LBP testing and evaluation is now a part of the CHS process.
Interim control methods are preferred over lead-based paint abatement and will be instituted
whenever possible. However, lead-based paint abatement may still be required in certain
circumstances. Currently, large abatement projects might require an out of town contractor
certified in lead abatement to assist.
HOUSING
HOUSING NEEDS
1. Describe Actions taken during the last year to foster and maintain affordable housing.
CAPER Housing Needs response:
1. FOSTERING AND MAINTAINING AFFORDABLE HOUSING
As discussed in previous sections, the City spent $1,399,180.24 on affordable housing activities
through both the City (HUD and local grants) and through non-profits in the 2011 program year.
The following activities helped to foster and maintain quality affordable housing in San Angelo:
• CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program ($266,491.22)
• CDBG Emergency Repair Program ($145,944.42)
• HOME Neighborhood Revitalization Program
o Homebuyers Assistance Program ($162,547.60)
o New Housing Construction including CHDO activities ($368,310.00)
• TBRA ($55,887.00)
• Local grants ($400,000.00)
Accomplishment Unit of Measure 2011 Program Year Accomplishments
Homes rehabilitated (Emergency Repair, Rehab) 112
New homes constructed (City and CHDO activities) 5
First-time Homebuyers assisted (HOME and local
24
grant funds)
Rental housing subsidies (TBRA) 21
SPECIFIC HOUSING NEEDS
1. Evaluate progress in meeting specific objective of providing affordable housing, including
the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income renter and owner
18

194. households comparing actual accomplishments with proposed goals during the reporting
period.
2. Evaluate progress in providing affordable housing that meets the Section 215 definition of
affordable housing for rental and owner households comparing actual accomplishments with
proposed goals during the reporting period.
3. Describe efforts to address “worst-case” housing needs and housing needs of persons with
disabilities.
CAPER Specific Housing Objectives response:
1. MEETING SPECIFIC AFFORDABLE HOUSING OBJECTIVES
Table below displays beneficiary information for both CDBG and HOME from housing programs
aimed at increasing the affordability of homes to low income citizens.
Income Level
60% of
Total
Extremely Very Median
Funding Housing Low Above
Activity Low Low -
Source Units (80%) 80%
(30%) (50%) (HOME
Served
Only)
COSA Emergency
CDBG 68 42 13 13 0
Repairs
COSA Housing
CDBG Rehabs (includes 41 22 13 6 0
neighborhood blitz)
New Construction -
HOME 3 0 2 1 0 0
COSA & GCDC
COSA
HOME 1 0 1 0 0 0
Reconstruction
COSA Homebuyers
HOME 24 0 9 4 11 0
Assistance
Rental Assistance
HOME 21 21 0 0 0 0
(TBRA) MHMR
19

195. 2. SECTION 215 AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The following housing projects resulted in new affordable units, completed in the 2011 program
year, that meet the Section 215 definition of affordable housing:
• City of San Angelo – First Time Homebuyer Program (24)
• City of San Angelo – Neighborhood Revitalization (3)
• MHMR Tenant-based Rental assistance (21)
3. WORST-CASE AND DISABLED HOUSING
Many of our projects assisted by the City of San Angelo during the 2011 program year
incorporated housing that is accessible for persons with disabilities or severe housing needs
including the following:
• City owned Elderly/Disabled rental housing units
• MHMR Rental Assistance for mentally challenged individuals
PUBLIC HOUSING STRATEGY
1. Describe actions taken during the last year to improve public housing and resident
initiatives.
CAPER Public Housing Strategy Response:
The City of San Angelo has a working relationship with the San Angelo Public Housing Authority
to meet the public housing needs within the community. However, PHA did not request a grant
for 2011 so no CDBG funds were utilized this last year for public housing.
BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
1. Describe actions taken during the last year to eliminate barriers to affordable housing.
CAPER Barriers to Affordable Housing response:
The major barrier to affordable housing is still a lack of funds. While education and/or job
training may provide a means to increasing income and improving living conditions for some low
income families, low income elderly and disabled will not likely be able to achieve these goals
through education or job training.
Slow economic development in San Angelo is another barrier to affordable housing for some
citizens. The City of San Angelo has undertaken aggressive measures to remedy the problem.
One of those measures was to extend the ½ cent sales tax to fund performance-based job
creation and business retention. The City of San Angelo Development Corporation provides
grants to businesses interested in setting up or expanding operations in San Angelo. Types of
businesses include manufacturing, warehousing/distribution, data processing,
telecommunications services, research and development, information services, correctional
institutions, mining, and agricultural services.
20

196. Other efforts to reduce barriers to economic development include:
Tax Abatements: The City of San Angelo and Tom Green County provided personal property
and real estate tax abatements for periods of 5 to 7 years. Abatement levels range from 20% to
75% and are determined by the number of new jobs created and/or the amount of new
investment in the community. All companies receiving the abatements must meet the minimum
job creation level of 5 new jobs and no less than $250,000 in new valuation in either real estate
and/or personal property.
Inventory Tax Exemptions : All three taxing districts within San Angelo (City, County, the San
Angelo Independent School District) may provide 100% tax exemptions for inventory and work-
in-process that will be shipped outside of the state of Texas and kept on site for less than 175
days. San Angelo is one of the few cities in Texas where all three taxing districts provide this
incentive.
Tom Green County/San Angelo Enterprise Zone: The Zone was created by the Texas
Department of Economic Development in 1996, and renewed in September of 2003. Unlike the
local tax abatement program, all businesses are eligible for designation as a “project.” However,
there are a limited number of projects selected state-wide, so job creation and job quality are
important considerations for each project.
Industrial District Designation: A company that wishes to locate outside of the city limits of San
Angelo and still avail themselves of city services, may apply to the City for designation as an
industrial district, with the expectation that they will be annexed at some future date. These
agreements typically last for 7 years, but may be extended. During this period of time they are
outside of the city limits, the company does not pay city personal property tax (inventory and
equipment), but they do pay a negotiated percentage of real estate tax they would normally pay.
Past agreements were 10% in year one, 20% in year two, etc.
Other Assistance: San Angelo’s public and private sectors work together to help create an
atmosphere for new job creation. The Chamber of Commerce can provide coordination of
services such as incentives, training, arrangement for financing, find available land and
buildings, and refer business owners to helpful services provided by our Angelo State
University, Small Business Development Center and the Concho Valley Center for
Entrepreneurial Development.
HOME/ ADDI
1. Assessment of Relationship of HOME Funds to Goals and Objectives
a. Evaluate progress made toward meeting goals for providing affordable housing using
HOME funds, including the number and types of households served.
2. HOME Match Report
a. Use HOME Match Report HUD-40107-A to report on match contributions for the period
covered by the Consolidated Plan program year.
3. HOME MBE and WBE Report
a. Use Part III of HUD Form 40107 to report contracts and subcontracts with Minority
Business Enterprises (MBEs) and Women’s Business Enterprises (WBEs).
21

197. 4. Assessments
a. Detail results of on-site inspections of rental housing.
b. Describe the HOME jurisdiction’s affirmative marketing actions.
c. Describe outreach to minority and women owned businesses.
CAPER HOME/ADDI Response:
HOME GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The table below summarizes projects completed and funds expended.
2011 HOME Funded Projects
Service Funds
Projects Annual Goal Accomplishments
Provider Expended
COSA New Construction COSA 2 3 $293,310.00
CHDO New Construction GCDC 1 2 $75,000.00
Homebuyers Assistance COSA 12 24 $162,547.60
Homeowner Rehab COSA 0 1 $64,065.14
Rental Assistance MHMR 20 21 $55,887.00
HOME ADMIN COSA $40,744.90
Total $691,554.64
RESULTS OF ON-SITE INSPECTIONS OF RENTAL HOUSING
HOME funds were used in carrying out the TBRA program and city staff insured that all units
occupied by the clients served were brought into compliance with the City of San Angelo’s local
code. If at the time of inspection a unit is not in compliance, it is up to the landlord/owner of the
rental unit to bring the unit into compliance before any HOME funds can be provided.
22

198. AFFIRMATIVE MARKETING and OUTREACH EFFORTS
In accordance with CDBG and HOME regulations and in furtherance of the City of San Angelo’s
commitment to non-discrimination and equal opportunity in housing, the City of San Angelo has
established procedures to affirmatively market units acquired, rehabilitated, constructed or
otherwise assisted under the CDBG and/or HOME Programs. The City of San Angelo is
committed to the goals of non-discrimination and equal access. In addition, the City is
committed to the goals of increasing the housing opportunities of those with limited English
proficiency, low-income residents and under-represented ethnic and racial groups. These goals
will be reached through the implementation of the City’s Affirmative Marketing Policy. The
implementation of this policy should result in a diverse tenant population in each of the
affordable housing developments, with a representation of ethnic and racial groups which is
consistent with their representation in the City.
The City Council of San Angelo actively promotes fair housing through:
• Ongoing funding of fair housing services
• Adoption and implementation of an “Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice”
• Adoption of “Consolidated Plan” for CDBG/HOME program, with an analysis and strategy for
fair housing every five years, and in the Annual Action Plan each year.
• Annual monitoring of fair housing activities through monitoring of fair housing services and
reporting on ongoing activities in its Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report
(CAPER)
The goal of the affirmative marketing procedures and outreach efforts are to ensure that all
persons – regardless of their race, color, national origin, age, religion, sex, disability, familial
status or English proficiency – are aware of the affordable housing opportunities generated by
federal HOME funds and City Housing Funds and program activities, in accordance with 24
CFR 108.1.
The City of San Angelo is responsible for the implementation of the Affirmative Marketing
Policies and Procedures and all owners, developers, Community Housing Development
Organizations and other nonprofits must comply with this policy for all CDBG, HOME, and City
funded housing developments.
The city took the following affirmative marketing actions:
o Informed the Public, Owners and Potential Tenants about Fair Housing
o Recipients of CDBG, HOME and/or City funds were informed of the City’s Affirmative
Marketing policies by having this policy referenced in the agreement as an attachment
with the City for the receipt of funds and by making compliance with this policy a
requirement for the duration of the agreement.
o Advertised in local newspapers, public service announcements, distribution of fair
housing brochures at relevant events, community presentations, and other outreach
activities to inform the community about fair housing rights and responsibilities.
o Posted flyers of upcoming housing opportunities in the City Hall Center lobby, Senior
Centers, Community Centers, Neighborhood Centers and Library and homeless shelter
organizations.
o Maintained and made available to interested parties a listing of the affordable housing
stock which includes information about who to contact regarding the availability of
housing.
23

199. o Utilized newspapers, churches and places of worship, and nonprofit organizations that
serve the underrepresented group to distribute information about housing openings.
o Provided all advertising in the language the group is most familiar with and provide a
contact person who can answer questions in the language primarily spoken by the target
group.
o Posted notice of availability of housing on the website.
The city took the following actions to recruit minority and women businesses
o Targeted outreach to businesses owned by ethnic and racial groups and women.
o Utilized newspapers, websites, churches and places of worship, and nonprofit
organizations that serve the underrepresented group to distribute information about
business opportunities.
o Sent bid packages on CDBG/HOME funded projects to minority/women owned
businesses affording those businesses an opportunity to participate in the city programs
o Presented information on business opportunities at professional events such as the
Home Builders Association meetings.
o Advertised business opportunities in both English and Spanish
HOMELESS
HOMELESS NEEDS
*Please also refer to the Homeless Needs Table in the Needs.xls workbook.
1. Identify actions taken to address needs of homeless persons.
2. Identify actions to help homeless persons make the transition to permanent housing and
independent living.
3. Identify new Federal resources obtained from Homeless SuperNOFA.
CAPER Homeless Needs Response:
The City of San Angelo deems homelessness a major concern that must be dealt with on a
strategic level. CHS staff routinely attends local homeless coalition meetings to discuss
homeless issues. In addition, the City of San Angelo is working with the Texas Homeless
Network, Balance of State Continuum of Care to create a West Texas Region Homeless
Consortium.
No new San Angelo projects were included in the Homeless SuperNOFA program for 2011.
SPECIFIC HOMELESS PREVENTION ELEMENTS
1. Identify actions taken to prevent homelessness.
CAPER Specific Housing Prevention Elements response:
The City of San Angelo is working to prevent homelessness through the allocation of CDBG
funds to MHMR Services of the Concho Valley which provides rental stipends to individuals with
24

200. mental health problems. Without the stipends, these individuals are at risk of becoming
homeless.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
*Please also refer to the Community Development Table in the Needs.xls workbook.
1. Assessment of Relationship of CDBG Funds to Goals and Objectives
a. Assess use of CDBG funds in relation to the priorities, needs, goals, and specific
objectives in the Consolidated Plan, particularly the highest priority activities.
b. Evaluate progress made toward meeting goals for providing affordable housing using
CDBG funds, including the number and types of households served.
c. Indicate the extent to which CDBG funds were used for activities that benefited
extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons.
2. Changes in Program Objectives
a. Identify the nature of and the reasons for any changes in program objectives and how
the jurisdiction would change its program as a result of its experiences.
3. Assessment of Efforts in Carrying Out Planned Actions
a. Indicate how grantee pursued all resources indicated in the Consolidated Plan.
b. Indicate how grantee provided certifications of consistency in a fair and impartial
manner.
c. Indicate how grantee did not hinder Consolidated Plan implementation by action or willful
inaction.
4. For Funds Not Used for National Objectives
a. Indicate how use of CDBG funds did not meet national objectives.
b. Indicate how did not comply with overall benefit certification.
5. Anti-displacement and Relocation – for activities that involve acquisition, rehabilitation or
demolition of occupied real property
a. Describe steps actually taken to minimize the amount of displacement resulting from the
CDBG-assisted activities.
b. Describe steps taken to identify households, businesses, farms or nonprofit
organizations who occupied properties subject to the Uniform Relocation Act or Section
104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and
whether or not they were displaced, and the nature of their needs and preferences.
c. Describe steps taken to ensure the timely issuance of information notices to displaced
households, businesses, farms, or nonprofit organizations.
6. Low/Mod Job Activities – for economic development activities undertaken where jobs were
made available but not taken by low- or moderate-income persons
a. Describe actions taken by grantee and businesses to ensure first consideration was or
will be given to low/mod persons.
b. List by job title of all the permanent jobs created/retained and those that were made
available to low/mod persons.
25

201. c. If any of jobs claimed as being available to low/mod persons require special skill, work
experience, or education, provide a description of steps being taken or that will be taken
to provide such skills, experience, or education.
7. Low/Mod Limited Clientele Activities – for activities not falling within one of the categories of
presumed limited clientele low and moderate income benefit
a. Describe how the nature, location, or other information demonstrates the activities
benefit a limited clientele at least 51% of whom are low- and moderate-income.
8. Program income received
a. Detail the amount of program income reported that was returned to each individual
revolving fund, e.g., housing rehabilitation, economic development, or other type of
revolving fund.
b. Detail the amount repaid on each float-funded activity.
c. Detail all other loan repayments broken down by the categories of housing rehabilitation,
economic development, or other.
d. Detail the amount of income received from the sale of property by parcel.
9. Prior period adjustments – where reimbursement was made this reporting period for
expenditures (made in previous reporting periods) that have been disallowed, provide the
following information:
a. The activity name and number as shown in IDIS;
b. The program year(s) in which the expenditure(s) for the disallowed activity(ies) was
reported;
c. The amount returned to line-of-credit or program account; and
d. Total amount to be reimbursed and the time period over which the reimbursement is to
be made, if the reimbursement is made with multi-year payments.
10. Loans and other receivables
a. List the principal balance for each float-funded activity outstanding as of the end of the
reporting period and the date(s) by which the funds are expected to be received.
b. List the total number of other loans outstanding and the principal balance owed as of the
end of the reporting period.
c. List separately the total number of outstanding loans that are deferred or forgivable, the
principal balance owed as of the end of the reporting period, and the terms of the
deferral or forgiveness.
d. Detail the total number and amount of loans made with CDBG funds that have gone into
default and for which the balance was forgiven or written off during the reporting period.
e. Provide a List of the parcels of property owned by the grantee or its subrecipients that
have been acquired or improved using CDBG funds and that are available for sale as of
the end of the reporting period.
11. Lump sum agreements
a. Provide the name of the financial institution.
b. Provide the date the funds were deposited.
c. Provide the date the use of funds commenced.
d. Provide the percentage of funds disbursed within 180 days of deposit in the institution.
12. Housing Rehabilitation – for each type of rehabilitation program for which projects/units were
reported as completed during the program year
a. Identify the type of program and number of projects/units completed for each program.
26

202. b. Provide the total CDBG funds involved in the program.
c. Detail other public and private funds involved in the project.
13. Neighborhood Revitalization Strategies – for grantees that have HUD-approved
neighborhood revitalization strategies
a. Describe progress against benchmarks for the program year. For grantees with
Federally-designated EZs or ECs that received HUD approval for a neighborhood
revitalization strategy, reports that are required as part of the EZ/EC process shall
suffice for purposes of reporting progress.
CAPER Community Development Response:
1. ASSESSMENT OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
During the 2011 program year, CDBG funds were distributed among the HUD priority-needs
identified in the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan. The table below provides a breakdown of
proposed and actual CDBG expenditures during 2011 which includes prior year funds.
2011 Distribution of CDBG Funds by Priority Need
% of
Priority Need Proposed Budget Funds Expended
Total
Affordable Housing $360,663.00 20% $412,435.64
Clearance $54,000.00 3% $53,956.18
.
In addition to those projects initiated during the reporting period, several projects begun in
previous years spent money during the 2011 program year. The table below outlines activities
funded with prior year funds, but expended in 2011.
Prior Year CDBG Funded Projects
Program Annual CDBG Funds
Projects Service Provider Accomplishments
Year Goal Expended
Health Department
2007 CDBG 1 1 $ 460,119.72
Relocation
Dangerous Buildings
2009 Fire Prevention 10 Structures 43 properties $ 3,585.21
Inspector
Dangerous Buildings
2010 Fire Prevention 10 Structures 478 properties $ 11,616.12
Inspector
2010 Code Compliance Code Compliance 725 480 $ 4,230.73
2008 Debt Service CDBG 0 0 $ 150,036.80
2009 Demolition CDBG 3 1 $ 65.00
2. CHANGES IN PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
No major changes to the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan Program were made during this
27

203. reporting period. The priorities identified in the Five-year Plan were the basis for allocating HUD
funds during 2011 program year.
3. ASSESSMENT OF EFFORTS IN CARRYING OUT PLANNED ACTIONS
Pursuing Resources Indicated in Consolidated Plan
In addition to the Federal funds discussed in this report, during the 2011 program year
subrecipients were able to secure resources from a variety of other public and private sources
to address priority needs identified in the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan. Sources of additional
funding included:
• Operating budgets of subrecipient organizations
• United Way of the Concho Valley
• Sterling Turner Foundation
• Department of Labor
• Department of Family Protection Services
• Texas Education Agency
• Various private foundations, corporations, and individuals
Certifications of Consistency
The City of San Angelo maintains a public request for proposals process to identify activities
that will be funded each program year. This process is open to all who wish to submit proposals
and project selections are made on the basis of lowest bid. CHS staff members provide
technical assistance to all applicants who request it. This technical assistance includes advice
on how to craft a proposed activity that will be eligible under the applicable program regulations
and consistent with San Angelo’s Consolidated Plan. As a result, nearly all projects that are
proposed are found to be consistent with the Consolidated Plan. Applicants seeking
certification that their activities are consistent with the Consolidated Plan are not discriminated
against on any basis and certification is provided in a fair and impartial manner.
Consolidated Plan Implementation
The City of San Angelo maintains an open and highly transparent process for the preparation
and implementation of Consolidated Plans. The City of San Angelo does not hinder the
implementation of the Plan through any action or willful inaction. As this report and those
submitted in prior program years illustrate, San Angelo has made consistent and significant
progress toward meeting and exceeding published accomplishment goals and objectives.
4. FUNDS NOT USED FOR NATIONAL OBJECTIVES
- Not Applicable -
5. ANTI-DISPLACEMENT AND RELOCATION
No households, businesses, farms, or nonprofit organizations were displaced as a result of
CDBG-assisted activities. Moreover, the homes demolished using CDBG funds were
unoccupied and did not result in displacement.
28

204. 6. LOW/MOD JOB ACTIVITIES
There were no job creation activities during the program year.
7. LOW/MOD LIMITED CLIENTELE ACTIVITIES
For the 2011 program year, the city did not fund public service activities, nor activities that met
the limited clientele national objective. Majority of the 2011 funds were earmarked for housing
activities.
8. PROGRAM INCOME RECEIVED
The City received $54,173 in CDBG program income for program year 2011 from loans.
9. PRIOR PERIOD ADJUSTMENTS
- Not Applicable -
10. LOANS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
Overall, there is a total of 108 CDBG loans outstanding totaling $342,330.92 with two (2) loans
in default and currently in the legal department for resolution.
11. LUMP SUM AGREEMENTS
- Not Applicable -
12. HOUSING REHABILITATION
Program Accomplishments
During the 2011 program year, two major programs received CDBG funding to operate housing
rehabilitation projects for low-income homeowners.
2011 CDBG Housing Rehab Activities
Income Level
Total Female
Extremely Very Income Non-White
Activity Housing Low Head of Hispanic
Low Low Total Households
Units Served Household
Emergency
68 42 13 13 68 35 8 26
Repairs
Homeowner
41 22 13 6 41 19 4 16
Rehabilitation
Total CDBG Funds Spent
For the 2011 program year a total of $1,383,781.17 of CDBG funds were expended. This
includes $629,653.58 from prior year funds, $547,646.64 used to complete rehabilitation
activities (includes Emergency Repairs, Housing Rehab programs and Rehab administration);
$53,956.18 for clearance, and $171,956.83 for administration.
29

205. Public and Private Funds
The City expended $400K to support affordable housing via the local ½ cent sales tax program.
This provided gap financing for 6 first-time homebuyers.
13. NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION STRATEGIES
The City of San Angelo has undertaken a Neighborhood Revitalization Program designed to
improve the quality and character of the housing stock in specific target area designated by the
City Council for owner-occupied housing rehabilitation, new construction of single family homes,
and down payment and closing cost assistance for low/moderate income home buyers. Maps
on pages 12-14 identify the areas of the city that have been targeted for revitalization and the
projects accomplished in those neighborhoods.
14. Section 108 Loan Activities
The City applied for and was approved for a Section 108 loan for the development of Producers’
Park and the renovation of Rio Vista Park. The City completed construction of Producers Park
and will begin work on Rio Vista Park. To date, the City paid $2,299.94 in interest on the debt.
No principle was paid in 2011.
Section 108 Financials
Grant #: B-07-MC-48-0025
rd
Activity Title 3 Party Loan Payments Rec’d from Balance Owed Status
(e.g., on-
Borrower, if Amount Borrower
time; late;
applicable
This Year Cumulative default)
B-07-MC-48-0025 $2,035,000 $150,036.80 $150,036.80 $1.928,000.00 On time
Sources of Payments to HUD Outstanding
CDBG Payments from Borrower Other Source (specify) Balance - HUD
This Year Cumulative This Year Cumulative This Year Cumulative
$150,036.80 $150,036.80 $150,036.80 $150,036.80 $0 $0 $1.928,000.00
ANITPOVERTY STRATEGY
1. Describe actions taken during the last year to reduce the number of persons living below the
poverty level.
CAPER Antipoverty Strategy Response:
Most activities undertaken by the City of San Angelo with CDBG and HOME funds are efforts to
reduce persons in poverty and improve the quality of life for San Angelo residents, either directly
or indirectly. Programs that directly influence the poverty level include: job enrichment,
30

206. development, and placement through education and economic development. Projects that
indirectly affect poverty include those that upgrade the community and provide affordable
housing. CDBG and HOME funds are often used as matching funds for other grants that also
reduce the number of poverty level families.
Specific projects supported during the 2011 Program Year that helped lift some participants out
of poverty include:
• Tenant-based Rental Assistance
• Home-buyers Assistance Program
• Elderly/disabled Duplex
NON-HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS
NON-HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS
*Please also refer to the Non-homeless Special Needs Table in the Needs.xls workbook.
1. Identify actions taken to address special needs of persons that are not homeless but require
supportive housing, (including persons with HIV/AIDS and their families).
CAPER Non-homeless Special Needs response:
Through CDBG program allocations, San Angelo was able to assist the following non-homeless
special needs:
• Elderly/disabled through the low-rent Forest Park Elderly Duplexes
• Clients with mental health/mental retardation through the Tenant-based Rental
Assistance administered through the MHMR
31

207. Priority Housing Needs/Investment Plan Table
(Table 2A)
Priority Need 5-Yr. Yr. 1 Yr. 2 Yr. 3 Yr. 4 Yr. 5
Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal
Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act
Plan/Act Plan/Act
Renters 135 27/31 27/25
0 - 30 of MFI 100 20/30 20/23
31 - 50% of MFI 25 5/1 5/2
51 - 80% of MFI 10 2/0 2/0
Owners 325 65/109 65/133
0 – 30% of MFI 150 30/41 30/62
31 – 50% of MFI 100 20/42 20/36
51 - 80% of MFI 75 15/26 15/35
Homeless*
Individuals
Families
Non-Homeless
Special Needs
Elderly 50 10/10 10/10
Frail Elderly
Severe Mental Illness 75 15/31 15/21
(Rental Assistance)
Physical Disability
Developmental Disability
Alcohol or Drug Abuse
HIV/AIDS
Victims of Domestic 25 5/0 5/0
Violence (Rental Asst)
Total (Sec. 215 and other)
Total Sec. 215
125 25/31 25/21
215 Renter
325 65/109 65/133
215 Owner
32

208. Priority Housing Activities/Investment Plan Table
(Table 2A)
Priority Need 5-Yr. Yr. 1 Yr. 2 Yr. 3 Yr. 4 Yr. 5
Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal
Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act
Plan/Act Plan/Act
CDBG
Acquisition of existing rental units
Production of new rental units
Rehabilitation of existing rental
units
Rental assistance
Acquisition of existing owner
units
Production of new owner units
Rehabilitation of existing owner 250 50/90 50/105
units
Homeownership assistance
HOME
Acquisition of existing rental units 25 5/0 5/2
Production of new rental units
Rehabilitation of existing rental
units
Rental assistance 100 25/31 25/21
Acquisition of existing owner
units
Production of new owner units 15 3/3 3/2
Rehabilitation of existing owner
units
Homeownership assistance 25 5/17 5/24
HOPWA NA
Rental assistance
Short term rent/mortgage utility
payments
Facility based housing
development
Facility based housing operations
Supportive services
Other NA
33

209. Annual Housing Completion Goals
Expected Actual Resources used during the period
Grantee Name: Annual # Annual
City of San Angelo of Units Number of
To Be Units CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA
Program Year: 2009
Completed Completed
BENEFICIARY GOALS
(Sec. 215 Only)
Homeless households
Non-homeless
91 138
households
Special needs
20 21
households
Total Sec. 215
111 159
Beneficiaries*
RENTAL GOALS
(Sec. 215 Only)
Acquisition of existing
1 2
units
Production of new
units
Rehabilitation of
existing units
Rental Assistance 20 21
Total Sec. 215
21 23
Affordable Rental
HOME OWNER
GOALS
(Sec. 215 Only)
Acquisition of existing
units
Production of new
2 3
units
Rehabilitation of
76 113
existing units
Homebuyer 12 24
34

210. Assistance
Total Sec. 215
90 140
Affordable Owner
COMBINED RENTAL
AND OWNER GOALS
(Sec. 215 Only)
Acquisition of existing
1 2
units
Production of new
2 3
units
Rehabilitation of
76 113
existing units
Rental Assistance 20 21
Homebuyer
12 24
Assistance
Combined Total Sec.
111 163
215 Goals*
OVERALL HOUSING
GOALS
(Sec. 215 + Other
Affordable Housing)
Annual Rental
21 23
Housing Goal
Annual Owner
90 140
Housing Goal
Total Overall Housing
111 163
Goal
35

211. Priority Community Development Activities
(Table 2B)
Priority Need 5-Yr. Yr. 1 Yr. 2 Yr. 3 Yr. 4 Yr. 5
Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal
Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act Plan/Act
Acquisition of Real Property 25 5/0 5/2
Disposition
Clearance and Demolition 50 10/33 10/15
Clearance of Contaminated
Sites
Code Enforcement 9000 1800/5679 1800/4601
Public Facility (General)
Senior Centers
Handicapped Centers
Homeless Facilities
Youth Centers
Neighborhood Facilities
Child Care Centers
Health Facilities
Mental Health Facilities
Parks and/or Recreation
Facilities
Parking Facilities
Tree Planting
Fire Stations/Equipment
Abused/Neglected Children
Facilities
Asbestos Removal
Non-Residential Historic
Preservation
Other Public Facility Needs
Infrastructure (General)
Water/Sewer Improvements
Street Improvements
Sidewalks
Solid Waste Disposal
Improvements
Flood Drainage Improvements
Other Infrastructure
Public Services (General)
Senior Services
Handicapped Services
Legal Services
Youth Services
Child Care Services
Transportation Services
Substance Abuse Services
36

212. Employment/Training Services
Health Services
Lead Hazard Screening
Crime Awareness
Fair Housing Activities
Tenant Landlord Counseling
Other Services (counseling) 25 5/11 5/0
Economic Development
(General)
C/I Land
Acquisition/Disposition
C/I Infrastructure Development
C/I Building Acq/Const/Rehab
Other C/I
ED Assistance to For-Profit
ED Technical Assistance
Micro-enterprise Assistance
Other
37

213. Performance Measurement System
2011 CAPER
Grantee: City of San Angelo, Texas
Please select one of the following:
The community is not using a local performance measurement system and does not
intend to develop such a system.
______The community is not using a local performance measurement system, but intends to
develop and implement such a system that includes some/all of the criteria listed below
by (date).
__X___The community is currently using a local performance measurement system. If yes,
please check off the following items that are included in your performance measurement
system and attach either a description of your system or a report from the system.
_X__ Long-term (multi-year) goals/objectives
_X__ Short-term (annual) goals/objectives
___ Expected units of accomplishment upon completion of project/activity
_X__ Actual units of accomplishment upon completion of project/activity
_X__ Expected units of accomplishment during each program year of the
project/activity
_X__ Actual units of accomplishment during each program year of the
project/activity
___ Aggregation of actual units of program year accomplishments to short-
term and long-term numeric goals/objectives
___ Outputs resulting from HUD funding are shown separately
___ One or more proposed outcome(s)
___ One or more actual outcome(s)
38

214. Neighborhood & Family Services
To secure Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships grant
funding from HUD for the City in order to enhance the facilities in the low income areas of
the community and the lives of low income residents and provide funds for safe, sanitary
and decent housing to qualified low income residents.
Budget Summary FY11 Actual FY11 Budget
Revenue
Grant Revenue $1,295,903 $1,026,126
Other $400,000 $335,000
Deficit/(Surplus) $(379,432) $ 0
Total Revenue $2,075,335 $1,361,126
Expenditure
Personnel $347,911 $376,759
Operations and $1,726,613 $1,338,953
maintenance
Capital $0 $0
Total Expenditure
Personnel Summary* FY11 Actual FY11 Budget
Full-time 6 6
Part-time 0 0
Total Personnel 6 6
Activity: Home Buyer Assistance Program
Serves City Council’s Vision: Neighborhood Vision, Community Appearance Vision
Goal: Secure grant funds to enhance the lives of low income residents and provide funds
for safe, sanitary and decent housing to qualified low income residents
Objectives: Provide a concise and fair application/allocation process open to all agencies
eligible for funding; Encourage citizen participation through newspaper advertising, public
service announcements, neighborhood meetings and public hearings
Performance Measures FY11 Actual FY11 Budget
Number of home buyers
24 12
assisted
Number of applications 35 17
Average cost per household
$6,772 $13,545
assisted
Percent of home buyers
assisted who earn less than 13 6
60% median family income
39

215. Activity: Tenant Based Rental Assistance
Serves City Council’s Vision: Neighborhood Vision, Community Appearance Vision
Goal: Secure grant funds to enhance the lives of low income residents and provide funds
for safe, sanitary and decent housing to qualified low income residents
Objectives: Provide a concise and fair application/allocation process open to all agencies
eligible for funding; Encourage citizen participation through newspaper advertising, public
service announcements, neighborhood meetings and public hearings
Performance Measures FY11 Actual FY11 Budget
Number of eligible
21 20
households/persons served
Average cost per renter
$325 $325
assisted (monthly)
Activity: Neighborhood Revitalization
Serves City Council’s Vision: Neighborhood Vision, Community Appearance Vision
Goal: Secure grant funds to enhance the lives of low income residents and provide funds
for safe, sanitary and decent housing to qualified low income residents
Objectives: Provide a concise and fair application/allocation process open to all agencies
eligible for funding; Encourage citizen participation through newspaper advertising, public
service announcements, neighborhood meetings and public hearings
Performance Measures FY11 Actual FY11 Budget
Cost per eligible
$72,062 $86,475
household/persons served
Number of projects
completed/Number of 6 5
eligible households served
Activity: Owner Occupied Services - Rehabilitation
Serves City Council’s Vision: Neighborhood Vision, Community Appearance Vision
Goal: Secure grant funds to enhance the lives of low income residents and provide funds
for safe, sanitary and decent housing to qualified low income residents
Objectives: Provide a concise and fair application/allocation process open to all agencies
eligible for funding; Encourage citizen participation through newspaper advertising, public
service announcements, neighborhood meetings and public hearings
Performance Measures FY11 Actual FY11 Budget
Number of households
44 42
assisted
Cost per unit assisted $6,056 $6,345
40

216. Activity: Owner Occupied Services – Emergency Rehabilitation
Serves City Council’s Vision: Neighborhood Vision, Community Appearance Vision
Goal: Secure grant funds to enhance the lives of low income residents and provide funds
for safe, sanitary and decent housing to qualified low income residents
Objectives: Provide a concise and fair application/allocation process open to all agencies
eligible for funding; Encourage citizen participation through newspaper advertising, public
service announcements, neighborhood meetings and public hearings
Performance Measures FY11 Actual FY11 Budget
Number of households
68 40
assisted
Cost per unit assisted $2,146 $3,648
Activity: Section 108 Debt Service
Serves City Council’s Vision: Neighborhood Vision, Community Appearance Vision
Goal: Secure grant funds to enhance the lives of low income residents and provide funds
for safe, sanitary and decent housing to qualified low income residents
Objectives: Provide a concise and fair application/allocation process open to all agencies
eligible for funding; Encourage citizen participation through newspaper advertising, public
service announcements, neighborhood meetings and public hearings
Performance Measures FY11 Actual FY11 Budget
Cost per project $150,036 $150,036
Activity: Compliance
Serves City Council’s Vision: Neighborhood Vision, Community Appearance Vision
Goal: Secure Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships
grant funding from HUD
Objectives: Coordinate and manage the CDBG and HOME programs in accordance with
Council allocations and HUD regulations in a professional manner for the benefit of the City
Performance Measures FY11 Actual FY11 Budget
Number of repayments of
federal dollars due to
0 0
findings related to
completeness
No more than 1.5 times the
annual CDBG allocation will 1 <1
be available July 31
Anticipated number of
1 1
compliance reviews
Percent of projects
reviewed that are in 100% 100%
compliance
41

217. Activity: Financial Monitoring/Budgeting
Serves City Council’s Vision: Neighborhood Vision, Community Appearance Vision
Goal: Secure Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships
grant funding from HUD
Objectives: Coordinate and manage the CDBG and HOME programs in accordance with
Council allocations and HUD regulations in a professional manner for the benefit of the City
Performance Measures FY11 Actual FY11 Budget
Amount of repayment of federal
0 0
dollars due to findings
Number of internal findings due
0 0
to program noncompliance
42

218. 43

219. 44

220. 45

221. 46

222. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date:
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Sandra J. Villarreal, Health Services Manager
Subject: Agenda Item for December 4, 2012 Council Meeting
Contact: Sandra J. Villarreal, Health Services Manager, 657-4493
Caption: Regular
Consideration of matters related to the San Angelo-Tom Green County Health
Department, and Department of State Health Services and any action thereto:
A. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or
his designee the filing of grant submission to the Texas Department of
State Health Services for Public Health Emergency Preparedness
Discretionary Funds in the amount of $117,024 with a 10% match
requirement of $11,702 for the establishment of a Public Health
Emergency Response Center and;
B. Consideration of authorizing the 10% matching funds as required within
the grant application and;
C. Consideration of accepting said PHEP Discretionary Funds if awarded to
the City of San Angelo, and;
D. Consideration of authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary
documents related to said funds.
Summary: The San Angelo-Tom Green County Health Department has the opportunity, with
a short window, to apply for funds from the Texas Department of State Health
Services. The Discretionary funds will be used to establish a Public Health
Emergency Response Center (PHERC) at the San Angelo City Hall complex. The
proposed PHERC system will allow for the establishment of a Public Information
Center, a Command and Control Center, and an Ancillary Response Center, each
capable of communicating with each other and with the EOC.
History: The Department of State Health Services has remaining funds available from the
FY12 Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP) program, and is offering
these funds as Discretionary dollars to entities currently receiving FY13 PHEP
funding. These onetime project dollars must align within the scope of at least one
of the 15 Public Health Preparedness Capabilities and have a strong link to PHEP
activities. Our project addresses the following four of 15 capabilities:
Capability 1: Community Preparedness
Capability 3: Emergency Operations Coordination
Capability 4: Emergency Public Information and Warning
Capability 6: Information Sharing
In prior years, the health department has been successful in receiving
discretionary funds for equipment and furnishings at the Emergency Operations
Center, and most recently to enhance security at the Animal Shelter through

223. instillation of security cameras and perimeter fencing. Due to the Shelter serving
as a location for displaced animals and pets in emergency situations, this project
qualified for funding.
If the proposed application is approved, discretionary funds will be used for the
establishment of a Public Health Emergency Response Center within City Hall.
During a recent Bioterrorism exercise, City Hall staff was contaminated by a white
power, and therefore, could not respond to the Emergency Operations Center
(EOC). City Hall needs a system whereby an Emergency Response, in this case,
a public health emergency, can be managed from the city hall complex with
adequate communication and linkage to both the EOC and the general public.
Financial Impact: A 10% match is required for this grant, and is intended to be covered in the
following manner:
* Public Information Server and ancillary equipment: $17,936.00
10% Match of $1,794.00 to come from current PIO Budget
* Conference Room Linkage & Technology: $99,088.32
10% Match of $9,908.00 to come from current FY12/13 General Fund Savings
and / or remaining City Hall Project Funds.
Total Matching Funds:
$1,794 (PIO)
$9,908 (City Hall)
$11,702 (Total)
Related Vision Item Industry Vision….Better coordination between all taxing agencies
(if applicable): Industry Vision….Technology
Financial Vision….Core Services come first
Infrastructure Vision….Maintain Disaster Plans in events of catastrophic failures of
service
Other Information/ Staff recommends . . . approval
Recommendation:
Attachments: Resolution
Presentation: Powerpoint
Publication:
Reviewed by Rick Weise, x-1072
Director:
Approved by Legal: Date of Approval (attach Legal Approval Form)

224. A RESOLUTION BY THE SAN ANGELO CITY COUNCIL RATIFYING
THE APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS DISCRETIONARY FUNDS GRANT IN THE AMOUNT
OF $117,024.00 FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH
SERVICES TO ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY
RESPONSE CENTER AT THE SAN ANGELO CITY HALL COMPLEX
WHICH REQUIRES THE CITY TO CONTRIBUTE A TEN PERCENT
(10%) MATCH IN FUNDS IN AN AMOUNT OF $11,702.00; AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ACCEPT SUCH GRANT FUNDS FOR FY
2013, IF AWARDED, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO PAY THE
MATCH IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,702.00; AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY AND RELATED
DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, on or about November 15, 2012, the City of San Angelo (“City”) applied for a
Texas Department of State Health Services Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP)
Discretionary Funds Grant (“Grant”) in the amount of $117,024.00, to be used to carry out objectives
addressing Public Health Emergency Preparedness Goals of prevention, detection/reporting,
investigation, control recovery, and improvement, and specifically to establish a Public Health
Emergency Response Center at the San Angelo City Hall Complex (“Project”); and,
WHEREAS, said Grant requires City to contribute a match of a ten percent (10%) in funds in
the amount of $11,702.00 (“Match”) to Project;
WHEREAS, said Grant will permit City to accomplish the public purpose of engaging in a
coordinated effort among public health divisions and entities entrusted to respond to public health
emergencies in San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas by establishing said Project.
WHEREAS, ratification of said Grant application, acceptance of said Grant funds in the
amount of $117,024.00, authorization for payment by City of said ten percent (10%) Match in the
amount of $11,702.00, and authorization for City Manager to execute any necessary and related
documents is required by City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN
ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:
That the application for a Texas Department of State Health Services Public Health
Emergency Preparedness (PHEP) Discretionary Funds Grant for $117,024.00, to establish a Public
Health Emergency Response Center is hereby ratified and the grant of funds in the amount of
$117,024.00, if awarded, is hereby accepted, with the City being authorized to pay a ten percent (10%)
match in the amount of $11,702.00. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any necessary
and related documents for implementing and carrying out such grant.

225. PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2012.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
ATTEST: _________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
_________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM
_____________________________ ______________________________
Sandra Villarreal, Lysia H. Bowling
Health Services Manager City Attorney

226. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date:
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Sandra J. Villarreal, Health Services Manager
Subject: Agenda Item for December 4, 2012 Council Meeting
Contact: Sandra J. Villarreal, Health Services Manager, 657-4493
Caption: Regular
Consideration of matters related to the San Angelo-Tom Green County Health
Department, and Department of Health and Human Services Waiver 1115 Funds
and any action thereto:
A. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or
his designee the filing of grant submission to the Department of Health
and Human Services for Waiver 1115 Funds in the amount of $960,000
with a 40% match requirement of $400,000 over a four (4) year period for
the establishment of a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic;
B. Consideration of authorizing the 40% match of funds from the Nursing
Division recurring General Fund Transfer Revenue in the amount of
$100,000 yearly over the next four (4) years;
C. Consideration of accepting said Waiver 1115 funds award by the City, if
approved; and;
D. Consideration of authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents
related to said funds.
Summary: The San Angelo-Tom Green County Health Department has the opportunity,
within a short window, to apply for funds from the Health and Human Services
Commission. The Health Department’s application for Waiver 1115 funds to the
Department of Health and Human Services is for the re-establishment of a
Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic.
History: In October 2012, staff met to discuss Waiver 1115 funds with Shannon Medical
and decided to pursue an application with the Regional Partnership.
Waiver 1115 funds are funds allocated, mostly to hospitals, for uncompensated
care associated with caring for persons without insurance or income. These
funds are associated with Medicaid and are to be used to improve care, increase
efficiency and reduce costs. The overarching goals of this waiver in Texas
are to:
• Expand risk‐based managed care statewide;
• Support the development and maintenance of a coordinated care delivery
system through the creation of Regional Healthcare Partnerships (RHPs)
and RHP five year care and quality improvement transformation plans;
• Improve outcomes while containing cost growth;
• Protect and leverage financing to improve and prepare the health care

227. infrastructure to serve a newly insured population;
• Transition to quality‐based payment systems across managed care and
hospitals; and
• Provide a mechanism for investments in delivery system reform including
improved coordination in the current indigent care system now providing
services to individuals likely to gain coverage in 2014.
Waiver 1115 funds are for the expansion or enhancement of projects, and thus
cannot be used to sustain existing projects. Due to the elimination of the STD
Clinic at the Health Department in the new fiscal year, staff saw this as an
opportunity to re-establish an STD Clinic at a more central location, immediately
east of City Hall, which would not only fund the program for the next four (4)
years, but assist in reducing overall expenses within the Department while
providing for a permanent home for the City’s Health Department within the City
Hall Plaza area.
In summary, through the use of proposed Waiver 1115 Funds, staff is proposing
to reestablish the City’s STD Clinic, and purchase an adjoining property to the
City Hall Complex which will serve as home to the San Angelo Health
Department.
Financial Impact: The Nursing Division currently receives $100,000 in general fund transfers yearly
as part of the Budget process. Assuming that this general fund transfer will not
decrease over the next 4 years, these dollars will serve as San Angelo’s
Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) Match needed for Waiver 1115 funds. Thus, for
a $400,000 investment over the next four years, we will receive $960,000 in
operational funding.
If awarded, the grant dollars do not commit the City to any programming or
reimbursement requirements past the 4 years of funding. Although maximizing
current dollars in this manner may possibly result in enough funding to operate the
Clinic for up to 5 years, thus giving additional time to assist in securing future
operational dollars.
Related Vision Item Industry Vision….Better coordination between all taxing agencies
(if applicable): Industry Vision….Technology
Financial Vision….Core Services come first
Infrastructure Vision….Maintain Disaster Plans in events of catastrophic failures of
service
Other Information/ Staff recommends . . . approval
Recommendation:
Attachments: Resolution
Presentation: Powerpoint
Publication:
Reviewed by Rick Weise, x-1072
Director:
Approved by Legal: Date of Approval (attach Legal Approval Form)

228. A RESOLUTION BY THE SAN ANGELO CITY COUNCIL RATIFYING
THE APPLICATION FOR 1115 WAIVER FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF
$960, 000.00.00 FROM THE TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
COMMISSION TO ESTABLISH A SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE
CLINIC AT THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO-TOM GREEN COUNTY
HEALTH DEPARTMENT WHICH REQUIRES THE CITY TO
CONTRIBUTE A FORTY PERCENT (40%) MATCH IN FUNDS IN AN
AMOUNT OF $400,000.00 OVER A FOUR (4) YEAR PERIOD BEGINNING
FY 2013; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ACCEPT SUCH 1115
WAIVER FUNDS BEGINNING FY 2013 AND CONTINUING THROUGH
FY 2016, IF AWARDED, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO PAY THE
MATCH IN THE AMOUNT OF $400, 000.00; AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY AND RELATED
DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, on or about November 12, 2012, the City of San Angelo (“City”) applied for
1115 Waiver Funds from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (“1115 Waiver”) in the
amount of $960, 000.00, to be used to carry establish a sexually transmitted disease clinic (“STD
Clinic Project”) at the San Angelo-Tom Green County Health Department; and,
WHEREAS, said 1115 Waiver requires City to contribute a match of a forty percent (40%) in
funds in the amount of $400, 000.00 over a four (4) year period beginning FY 2013 for said STD
Clinic Project;
WHEREAS, said 1115 Waiver will permit City to accomplish the public purpose of
controlling and treating sexually transmitted diseases in San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas by
establishing said STD Clinic Project.
WHEREAS, ratification of said 1115 Waiver application, acceptance of said 1115 Waiver
funds in the amount of $960, 000.00, authorization for payment by City of said forty percent (40%)
Match in the amount of $400,000.00 over a four (4) year period beginning FY 2013 for said STD
Clinic Project; and authorization for City Manager to execute any necessary and related documents is
required by City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN
ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:
That the application for Texas Health and Human Services Commission 1115 Waiver Funds
for $960, 000.00, to establish a sexually transmitted disease clinic (“STD Clinic Project”) at the San
Angelo-Tom Green County Health Department is hereby ratified and the 1115 Waiver Funds in the
amount of $960,000.00, if awarded, is hereby accepted, with the City being authorized to pay a forty
percent (40%) match in the amount of $400,000.00 over a four (4) year period beginning FY 2013 for
said STD Clinic Project. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any necessary and related
documents for implementing and carrying out such 1115 Waiver Funds project.

229. PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2012.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
ATTEST: ________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM
_____________________________ ______________________________
Sandra Villarreal Lysia H. Bowling
Health Services Manager City Attorney

230. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: November 30, 2012
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Morgan Trainer, Budget Manager
Subject: Agenda Item for 12-4-12 Council Meeting
Contact: Morgan Trainer, 653-6291
Caption: Regular Item
Discussion and consideration of the possibility of issuing rebates of Water
Fees and any action related thereto.
Summary: Staff will present the Water Operations Fund Balance at relevant dates in an effort
to provide Council with the information necessary to form an opinion.
The fund balance in this fund is not at a level where staff would recommend a
rebate. Details will be presented.
History: There have been two occasions when this fund balance exceeded ninety days
expenditures and Council decided to use that excess. On one occasion the base
fees were changed to zero for two months, and on the other the excess was
transferred to a capital projects fund to assist with capital improvements.
Financial Impact: Reduction in fund balance – depending on the amount
Related Vision Item Financial Vision
(if applicable):
Other Information/ Staff recommends no action at this time.
Recommendation:
Attachments: N/A
Presentation: Powerpoint
Publication: No
Reviewed by Michael Dane
Director:
Approved by Legal: N/A

231. `
City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: November 30, 2012
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Morgan Trainer, Budget Manager
Subject: Agenda Item for November 20, 2012, Council Meeting
Contact: Morgan Trainer, Budget Manager
Caption: Regular Item
First public hearing and introduction of an Ordinance amending the 2012-2013
Budget for encumbrances, restricted and dedicated moneys, incomplete projects,
and grants which necessitate budget amendments
Summary: This proposed amendment contains the following items (additional information
attached):
• Encumbrances, Grants, Citizen Contributions, Restricted Monies, and
Incomplete Projects
• Fire Training Facility
• Rent and Utilities for Nursing Offices
• Landfill Gas Collection System Debt
• Twin Buttes South Pool Pumping
• Neighborhood Rehabilitation Program, Roof Program, and Neighborhood Blitz
History: See attached Budget Amendment Request memorandums.
Financial Impact: $25,973,495 (see attached detail on Exhibit A of the ordinance).
Related Vision Item N/A
(if applicable):
Other Information/ Staff recommends approval.
Recommendation:
Attachments: Ordinance including Exhibit A; Department request memos
Presentation: N/A
Publication: N/A
Reviewed by Michael Dane
Director:

232. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE
BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2012, AND
ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2013, FOR ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTED
AND DEDICATED MONEYS, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS.
WHEREAS the City of San Angelo has determined that new projects not included in the current
budget should begin, and
WHEREAS the City of San Angelo has determined that certain budgeted amounts should be
amended due to project changes and unforeseen circumstances, and
WHEREAS the resources necessary for these changes are available;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:
The City’s budget for fiscal year 2012-2013 be amended by the amounts contained in Exhibit A.
INTRODUCED on the 20th day of November, 2012, and APPROVED and ADOPTED on this
the 4th day of December, 2012.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
__________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved as to Content and Form:
__________________________________
Michael Dane, ACM/CFO

233. City of San Angelo
Proposed Budget Amendment
Exhibit A
Fund Number Fund Name Total Amendment
101 General 852,559
103 Intergovernmental 1,578,622
106 TIRZ 303,779
220 Airport 274,972
230 Landfill Operating 516,252
260 Water 1,620,062
270 Wastewater 189,588
301 Vehicle Maintenance 29,290
310 Health Insurance 343,288
320 Property/Casualty 333,805
410 Civic Events 9,550
453 Community Development Block Grant 570,000
501 Equipment Replacement 36,650
502 General Capital Projects 215,228
504 2007 General Bond 44,311
512 Waterline Supply Projects 2,328,116
513 Water Capital Projects 42,431
520 Wastewater Capital Projects 6,708,023
525 2007 Wastewater Bond 9,604,584
531 Airport Capital 60,922
601 Designated Revenue 311,463
Totals 25,973,495

234. City of San Angelo
Proposed Budget Amendment
Amendment
Additional Information
Project/Need Source of Funding Expense Revenue Net Cost
Budget Carryovers
Grants Multiple Funds – 419,544 798,342 (378,798)
Fund Balance
Citizen Contributions Designated 311,463 0 311,463
Revenue Fund –
Fund Balance
Restricted Items Multiple Funds – 1,169,948 0 1,169,948
Fund Balance
Capital Projects Multiple Funds – 19,974,952 0 19,974,952
Fund Balance
Encumbrances Multiple Funds – 1,421,336 0 1,421,336
Fund Balance
Fire Training Facility Economic 1,200,000 1,200,000 0
Development
Administration Grant
Rent and Utilities for Nursing Office RLSS Grant 20,000 20,000 0
Landfill Gas Collection System Debt Increased Landfill 516,252 811,000 (294,748)
Rates
Twin Buttes South Pool Pumping Project Water Operating 370,000 0 370,000
Fund/Fund Balance
Neighborhood Revitalization, Roof, and Type B Sales Tax 570,000 570,000 0
Neighborhood Blitz Programs
Totals 25,973,495 3,399,342 22,574,153

244. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: November 9, 2012
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO
Subject: Agenda Item for November 20, 2012 Council Meeting
Contact: Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO
Matt Lewis, San Angelo Area Foundation
Caption: Discussion and consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to
negotiate and execute an Office Lease Agreement By and Between the City of San
Angelo and the San Angelo Performing Arts Coalition (SAPAC) providing for the lease
of office space by SAPAC on the west mezzanine of the City Hall building.
Summary: Today’s action will authorize SAPAC to occupy the West Mezzanine in order to
facilitate operations and maintenance of activities conducted at the City Auditorium.
The draft lease agreement proposes a 20 year term with two (2) extended terms of ten
(10) years each. The proposed draft lease agreement will also address the shared
expense of essential costs such as utilities.
History: At its regular meeting on October 18, 2011, the San Angelo City Council heard a
presentation by Susan Brooks, SAPAC President, and Matt Lewis, President of the
San Angelo Area Foundation. The discussion centered on the future development of
SAPAC in what is commonly referred to as the “old Coke Warehouse,” and the role of
the City Auditorium as the centerpiece for the performing arts campus. In addition, staff
presented Council with a number of unfunded improvements necessary in the City
Auditorium. Council directed staff to negotiate a contract with SAPAC for management
and operations of the City Auditorium. (The office space is offered as consideration to
the management and operations of the Auditorium. SAPAC will still be responsible for
all utilities, etc. associated with their office use.) The proposed Operational Agreement
provides an opportunity for SAPAC to create a maintenance/equipment fund for future
improvements to the Auditorium through a ticket fee placed on each ticket sold by
SAPAC for all performances held in the City Auditorium during the term of the
Agreement.
At its regular meeting on March 6, 2012,the San Angelo City Council adopted a
resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to negotiate and execute a
Development and Operating Agreement For Performing Arts Campus By and Between
the City of San Angelo and the San Angelo Performing Arts Coalition (SAPAC) relating
to creation of the Performing Arts Center and Campus which will include the City
Auditorium; providing for management services by SAPAC; providing for the use of
office space by SAPAC within the City Hall building.
Key terms of the Development and Operating Agreement include:
SAPAC has agreed to:
- contribute $2.5M to complete the Auditorium annex.
- reimburse the City for expenditures to occupancy the leased space at 100%
- 20 years with 3 ten year option renewals, contingent on performance, as required
- $2 ticket fee for maintenance of the facility by City Council
- Scheduled decreasing of base HOT allocation with availability of additional

245. funding based on performance
- Will build a performing arts center for at least $10M (former Coke warehouse)
- Will create a operating endowment for $1M
- Will manage renovated annex and performing arts center
- Will provide box office services
- Will demonstrate charitable mission by providing access to a broad range of the
public
- Will provide an annual report to the city
- Will provide event insurance
City has agree to:
- to auditorium renovation is a city project
- will cooperate on naming rights to the extent allowed by advertising contract
- will allow sub-granting of HOT revenues
- will provide property insurance on Auditorium
- will lease Mezzanine for a nominal fee to SAPAC
- Hotel and Motel Occupancy Tax Revenue (HOT) transferred from the San Angelo
Cultural Affairs Council (SACAC) would be transferred to SAPAC
Financial Impact: No direct impact to the General Fund as SAPAC will be responsible for all utilities
for its office space. In addition, ticketing fees levied by SAPAC will be directed by
contract to a future maintenance/equipment fund for the Auditorium.
Other Information/ Staff recommends approval of an office lease agreement between the City of San
Recommendation: Angelo and SAPAC.
Attachments: Written Resolution, Draft Office Lease, and Development & Operating Agreement
(effective 10/16/12)
Presentation: Presentation by Assistant City Manager/CFO Michael Dane
Publication: N/A
Reviewed by Daniel Valenzuela
Director:
Approved by Legal: Asst. City Attorney Dan Saluri

304. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
EXECUTE AN OFFICE LEASE AGREEMENT BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND THE SAN
ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION (SAPAC)
PROVIDING FOR THE LEASE OF OFFICE SPACE BY SAPAC
ON THE WEST MEZZANINE OF THE CITY HALL BUILDING
WHEREAS, on March 6, 2012, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing
the Interim City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a Development and
Operating Agreement For Performing Arts Campus By and Between the City of San
Angelo and the San Angelo Performing Arts Coalition (SAPAC) relating to creation of
the Performing Arts Center and Campus which will include the City Auditorium;
providing for management services by SAPAC; providing for the use of office space by
SAPAC within the City Hall building; and providing for funding responsibilities; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Development and Operating Agreement, and as part
of the consideration therefore, the City shall provide SAPAC with office space on the
West Mezzanine of the historic City Hall building; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Office Lease Agreement, SAPAC shall construct, at
its sole cost, improvements necessary for its office use of the leased premises, in
conformity with the current restoration of the historic City Hall building;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:
The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute the Office
Lease Agreement by and between the City of San Angelo and the San Angelo Performing
Arts Coalition (SAPAC) for lease of the West Mezzanine of the historic City Hall
Building and providing for SAPAC to construct at its sole cost, improvements necessary
for its office use of the leased premises, in conformity with the current restoration of the
historic City Hall building.
PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2012.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
ATTEST:
Alvin New, Mayor
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM
Michael Dane Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer

305. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: November 21, 2012
To: COSADC Board
From: Shawn Lewis, Director of Community and Economic Development
Subject: Agenda Item for December 4, 2012
Contact: Shawn Lewis, 657-4210
Caption: Consideration and possible action regarding a recommendation by the City of San
Angelo Development Corporation to approve the expenditure of up to $23,000 from
half cent sales tax funds for cabinets, shelving, guest waiting furniture,
décor/artwork, receptionist desk and landscaping for the new Business Resource
Center
Summary: Several items were not included in the original budget for the BRC that COSADC
considers essential for making the building a first-rate facility for business services.
COSADC staff had proposed no additional funding, but rather, allowing staff to utilize
the already budgeted BRC Maintenance and Operations line item to fund these one-
time expenditures. At the COSADC meeting of November 14, the board determined
that funds available in that budget line item were inadequate to properly fund the
proposed improvements. Consequently, the board authorized an additional $23,000
from unallocated COSADC funds to pay for these items.
 Décor—COSADC, having not owned a building other than the CVCED, does not
own enough artwork, office plants, table décor, brochure racks, etc. to fill the
common areas of the BRC including the main hallway, lobby, conference room
(although the Health Foundation grant has funded the table, chairs and TV screen
in this room), break/reception area and training room.
 Furniture—all furniture owned by COSADC is currently in use, no furniture has
been discarded and no furniture is slated for replacement. However, the
corporation does not own a reception desk where Nora will sit. The Health
Department has temporarily loaned COSADC a desk which is not suited for a
reception desk and contains no storage. As shown in the photo below, boxes will
need to be stored behind this desk due to a lack of storage.

306. Also, the executive director’s office has no guest chairs. This is due to the fact
that a conference table formerly located in the director’s office is now located in a
common area. That conference table had four chairs, two of which were used as
the director’s office guest chairs and two were at the conference table.
Finally, the reception room/break room outside the training room has no furniture.
A used refrigerator from the CVCED can be utilized unless MedHab requests that
the refrigerator stay in the current CVCED building. The partners envision
couches, coffee-type tables or possible tall 3-4 person tables and chairs.
 Landscaping—Staff would like to zeriscape the four tree wells in front of the BRC
st
as well as the large planter bed along the cinderblock fence across 1 Street
which screens the BRC parking lot.

307. None: costs covered by FY12-13 BRC Maintenance & Operations budget if
authorized by COSADC board
Reception/Break room furnishings $10,670
Two guest chairs for ED office $200
Blinds for COSADC suite $1,000
Reception desk for COSADC suite $3,752
COSADC lettering/logo for office suite window $200
Zeriscaping and irrigation system repair $20,000
Artwork & décor in common areas $11,500
Landscape maintenance service for 10 months $500
Copy machine lease for 11 months $2,178
Janitorial services for 10 months $8,000
Financial Impact:
Total from budgeted $58,000 M&O line item $58,000
Contingency as recommended by COSADC $23,000
COSADC recommends authorizing an additional $23,000 toward these and other
Other Information/
expenses to complete the BRC.
Recommendation:
Shawn Lewis
Presentations:
Publication: N/A
Attachments: N/A
Reviewed by
Shawn Lewis
Director
Reviewed by Legal N/A

308. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: November 13, 2012
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Lisa Marley, Director of Human Resources and Risk Management
Subject: Agenda Item for November 20, 2012 Council Meeting
Caption: Regular Item
Discussion and consideration of closing City of San Angelo offices on Monday,
December 31, 2012 and Tuesday, January 1, 2013 to coincide with Tom Green County
offices New Year’s holiday.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Summary: Seeking approval from Council to approve an additional holiday for calendar
year 2013, by closing offices on December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2013 to
coincide with the Tom Green County offices. In November each year, the
holidays are identified for the following calendar year, and sent out to
employees.
History: On two occasions in the last five years, the City has added a holiday to the New
Year’s holiday to coincide with the Tom Green County schedule. Council
approved closing Monday, December 31, 2007 and Tuesday, January 1, 2008;
and Thursday, January 1, 2009 and Friday, January 2, 2009.
Financial Impact: The financial cost to the City is the same whether December 31, 2012 is a work
day or a holiday. The loss to the City is in productivity for the day.
Attachments: COSA holiday history spreadsheet.
Presented By: Lisa Marley, Director of Human Resources and Risk Management
Reviewed by: Lisa Marley, Director of Human Resources and Risk Management,
November 13, 2012.

309. COSA Holiday History
Year Notes # of Holidays
1991 Furthest records researched. 9
Feb-07 MLK day added for CY 2008 10
Nov-07 Due to TGC closing on Monday 12/31/07 11
and Tuesday 1/1/08, Council unanimously
approved same for COSA, but 12/31
is not a permanent holiday.
2008 No changes to established holiday schedule. 10
Nov-08 Due to TGC closing on Thursday 1/1/09 11
and Friday 1/2/09, Council unanimously
approved same for COSA, but 1/2 is not
a permanent holiday.
2010 No changes to established holiday schedule. 10
Nov-10 Added Veteran's Day as an official 11
holiday, starting in 2011.
2012 No changes to established holiday schedule. 11
2013 TGC is closed on Monday 12/31/12
and Tuesday 1/1/13.
Cost to City is same whether 12/31 is a holiday
or a work day. Loss is in productivity.

317. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: November 14, 2012
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Subject: Agenda Item for December 4, 2011 Council Meeting
Contact: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk, 657-4405
Caption: Consent
Consideration of approving appointments to MHMR Service for the Concho Valley
Board of Trustees recommended by Liaison Representative Committee
Recommended Board of Trustees:
Darling, Trudy–November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2014 (re-appointment)
Houston, Cary–November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2014 (re-appointment)
Shannon, Jacqueline–November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2014 (re-appointment)
Smith, Wayne E.–November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2014 (re-appointment)
Stokes, John–November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2014 (re-appointment)
Spieker, Dianna M.– appointed as alternate in case of a vacancy
Summary/History: Councilmember Silvas serves as the Council Representative to the MHMR Liaison
Representative Committee which presented the nominations. Term appointments
are from November 2012 to October 2014.
Financial Impact: None
Related Vision Item N/A
(if applicable):
Other Information/ Staff recommends approval.
Recommendation:
Attachments: Letter from MHMR
Presentation: N/A
Publication: N/A
Reviewed by N/A
Director:
Approved by Legal: N/A

318. TO: Appointing Agencies
Angelo State University-Dr. Rallo, President
City of San Angelo-City Council
San Angelo Independent School District-Board of Trustees
Tom Green County-Commissioners Court
FROM: Appointing Agencies - Liaison Representatives
Mr. Nolen Mears, Angelo State University
Mr. Johnny Silvas, City of San Angelo
Mr. Aubrey DeCordova, Tom Green County
Mr. Gerard Gallegos, San Angelo Independent School District
SUBJECT: Appointments to the Board of Trustees of the MHMR Services for the Concho Valley
DATE: November 14, 2012
The Liaison Representatives nominates the following persons for re-appointment to the MHMR Services for the
Concho Valley Board of Trustees for an unexpired term ending October 31, 2014:
Darling, Trudy–November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2014 (re-appointment)
Houston, Cary–November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2014 (re-appointment)
Shannon, Jacqueline–November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2014 (re-appointment)
Smith, Wayne E.–November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2014 (re-appointment)
Stokes, John–November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2014 (re-appointment)
Spieker, Dianna M.– appointed as alternate in case of a vacancy
Official appointment of these nominees is requested by the Liaison Representatives to provide a duly constituted Board
of Trustees as required by the Texas Laws Relating Mental Health and Mental Retardation. Documentation (notarized
meeting minutes where applicable) of the appointments should be sent to the Executive Director’s Office, MHMR
Services for the Concho Valley, 1501 West Beauregard, San Angelo, Texas 76901.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Ms. Annette Hernandez at (325) 658-7750 ext. 346.