Sismologia
na era da comunicação digital
Susana Custódio
susana@fc.ul.pt ESB, 22/Fev/2018
Bogota, Colombia, M6.2, 2015 Virginia, USA, M5.8, 2011
A nossa Terra
ETHZ-HPCSED
Placas litosféricas que se movem
NASA
O que é um sismo
ISC, 1960 – present
O que é um sismo?
Geração de ondas sísmicas
L. Matias, FCUL
[Hayes, Wald, et al.]
Destruição causada por sismos
Sichuan, China, M7.9, 2008
Haiti, M7, 2010
Christchurch, New Zealand, M6.3, 2011 Lorca, Espanha, M5.1, 2011
Mega-sismos: Sumatra, 2004, M9.1
Mega-sismos: Sumatra, 2004, M9.1
Perdas humanas e económicas
[Roger Bilham, Univ Colorado]
Como reduzir as perdas causadas pelos sismos?
REAKT
(From an original figure of T. Jordan redrawn by S. Wiemer)
Long-term
Hazard Mapping
Long-term
Forecasting
Short-term
Forecasting
Early Warning ShakeMaps
&
Rapid Loss
Aftershock
Forecasting
Decades Years
Days to
Minutes Seconds Minutes to Hours
Minutes
to Days
Earthquake
Estimar os impactos dos sismos
Earthquake
ferent time scales of the
uake process
re of
by
REAL-
1. Fonte
2. Propagação
3. Sítio
4. Vulnerabilidade
& Inventário
REAKT
Sismologia em tempo real
Long-term
Hazard Mapping
Long-term
Forecasting
Short-term
Forecasting
Early Warning ShakeMaps
&
Rapid Loss
Aftershock
Forecasting
Decades Years
Days to
Minutes Seconds Minutes to Hours
Minutes
to Days
Earthquake
REAKT
(From an original figure of T. Jordan redrawn by S. Wiemer)
Sismologia em tempo real com dados sísmicos
Kanamori, Nature 1997
Qual a informação que temos disponível
em tempo real?
Localização do Hipocentro (< 1 min)
SeisComP3
Hanka et al, ORFEUS Newsletter 2008Guralp
Shakemaps (5-7 min)
shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the
focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have
propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the
amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San
Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity.
ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has
also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have
substantially better station control.
• ‘Ground Motion
Prediction Equations’
(propagação das
ondas sísmicas)
• Interpolação entre
estações
Antecipar o movimento do solo
Earthquake
ferent time scales of the
uake process
re of
by
REAL-
1. Fonte
2. Propagação
3. Sítio
4. Vulnerabilidade
& Inventário
REAKT
Estimativa de danos
PAGER
M 7.8, IRAN-PAKISTAN BORDER REGION
Origin Time: Tue 2013-04-16 10:44:20 UTC (15:14:20 local)
Location: 28.11
o
N 62.05
o
E Depth: 82 km
PAGER
Version 6
Estimated Fatalities Estimated Economic Losses
Created: 7 hours, 31 minutes after earthquake
Estimated Population Exposed to Earthquake Shaking
ESTIMATED POPULATION
EXPOSURE (k = x1000)
- -* - -* 135k* 2,600k* 1,682k 377k 2k 0 0
ESTIMATED MODIFIED
MERCALLI INTENSITY
PERCEIVED SHAKING Not felt Weak Light Moderate Strong Very Strong Severe Violent Extreme
POTENTIAL
DAMAGE
Resistant
Structures
Vulnerable
Structures
none
none
none
none
none
none
V. Light
Light
Light
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate/Heavy
Moderate/Heavy
Heavy
Heavy
V. Heavy
V. Heavy
V. Heavy
*Estimated exposure only includes population within the map area.
Population Exposure population per ~1 sq. km from Landscan
Orange alert level for shaking-related fatalities.
Significant casualties are likely and the disaster
is potentially widespread. Past events with this
alert level have required a regional or national
level response.
Yellow alert level for economic losses. Some
damage is possible. Estimated economic losses
are less than 1% of GDP of the Islamic Republic
of Iran.
Structures:
Overall, the population in this region resides
in structures that are highly vulnerable to
earthquake shaking, though some resistant
structures exist. The predominant vulnerable
building types are adobe block and
unreinforced brick with timber floor
construction.
Historical Earthquakes (with MMI levels):
Date
(UTC)
Dist.
(km)
Mag. Max
MMI(#)
Shaking
Deaths
1989-12-07 389 5.9 VIII(127) 0
1994-02-23 339 6.1 VII(508) 6
2003-12-26 386 6.6 IX(70k) 26k
Recent earthquakes in this area have caused
secondary hazards such as landslides that
might have contributed to losses.
Selected City Exposure
from GeoNames.org
MMI City Population
VII Khash 70k
VI Zahedan 552k
VI Iranshahr 131k
VI Rudbar 11k
Sismologia em tempo real
Long-term
Hazard Mapping
Long-term
Forecasting
Short-term
Forecasting
Early Warning ShakeMaps
&
Rapid Loss
Aftershock
Forecasting
Decades Years
Days to
Minutes Seconds Minutes to Hours
Minutes
to Days
Earthquake
REAKT
(From an original figure of T. Jordan redrawn by S. Wiemer)
Aviso Antecipado
Aviso Antecipado
1.
As primeiras ondas (P)
têm menor amplitude.
2.
As primeiras ondas (P)
contêm informação sobre
a magnitude dos sismos.
Allen et al, 2003
Aviso Antecipado
JMA
Aviso Antecipado
Allen et al, SRL 2009
REDES DE CIDADÃOS
“CITIZEN EMPOWERED SEISMOLOGY”
CROWDSOURCING
Did You Feel It?
IPMA
Did You Feel It?
Wald et al, AG 2012
M 4.2, VA M 4.4, CA
Detecção de sismos por acessos à página do EMSC
Detecção de sismos por acessos à página do EMSC
Bossu et al, AG 2012
Detecção de sismos por Tweets
Earle et al, AG 2012
“earthquake”, “gempa”, “temblor”, “terremoto”, “sismo”
Redes de MEMS (Micro Electro Mechanical Systems)
Quake Catcher Network
O que é que vamos ver com redes muito densas?
Clayton et al
O que é que vamos ver com redes muito densas?
Clayton et al
O que é que vamos ver com redes muito densas?
Clayton et al, AG 2012
E em Portugal?
As magnitudes dos sismos
Zoback and Gorelick, 2012
Fast Earthquake W arnings
Email
SMS
Radio
Fax
Telefone
Civil
Protection
W arnings [ operator validation]
Delay after Origin Time: 3m40s
Delay after 1º record: 3m31s
Delay after minimum set of records (10): 2m43s
SeiscomP 2.6, SEISAN 8.1 (modified) and in-house software
Portugal: Hipocentro e Magnitude
Imagem cedida por F. Carrilho, IPMA
Shakemap: Portugal
Sentiu um sismo?
Alguns links…
• IPMA:
– https://www.ipma.pt/pt/geofisica/sismologia/
• EMSC:
– http://www.emsc-csem.org
– http://www.citizenseismology.eu/index.html#materials
• USGS:
– http://earthquake.usgs.gov
Webpages
• PAGER: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/pager/
Aviso Antecipado
Aviso Antecipado
Ondas sísmicas
Um século de sismos
Ammon et al.,
SRL 2010
Detecção de sismos por Tweets
Earle et al, AG 2012
W phase: CMT (Centroid Moment Tensor)
Duputel et al, preliminary results for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake
W-phase
Lockwood and Kanamori, G3 2006
W-phase
W phase source inversion group
http://wphase.unistra.fr/
Onda de longo período (100 – 1000 s)
W-phase
Seth and Wyssession,
Blackwell Publishing 2003
Modelação de Fontes Sísmicas: Inversões
Source
Source
Modelação de Fontes Sísmicas: Inversões
Source
Propagação das ondas
Modelação de Fontes Sísmicas: Inversões
Source
Propagação das ondas
Modelado
Modelação de Fontes Sísmicas: Inversões
Source
Propagação das ondas
Modelado
Dados
Modelação de Fontes Sísmicas: Inversões
Source
Propagação das ondas
Modelado
Dados
Modelação de Fontes Sísmicas: Inversões
W phase: CMT (Centroid Moment Tensor)
Duputel et al, preliminary results for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake
W phase: CMT (Centroid Moment Tensor)
Duputel et al, preliminary results for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake
Redes de MEMS
QCN
Mwp
Tsuboi, GRL 2000
W phase: CMT (Centroid Moment Tensor)
Actualização dos Shakemaps e dos danos previstos
Mapas de velocidade de pico cumulativa
Terashake
Human and economic losses
[Roger Bilham, Univ Colorado]
This is how much
we borrowed
from Troika
Qual a informação que temos disponível
em tempo real?
Portugal: Factores de Amplificação
Teves-Costa et al, 2010
Determinação de Magnitudes
Bobby Motwani
Determinação de Magnitudes
SeisComp3
Hanka et al, ORFEUS Newsletter 2008
Mecanismo Focal:
Inversões do Tensor Momento
Source
Propagação das ondas
Sismo TO
Tempo
Redes Globais
Estimativa de danos
Sismo TO
Redes Regionais
Portugal
3 min 5 min
2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min
Hipocentro
5-15 min
< 1 min
Magnitude
5-20 min
2-3 min
30 min 1 hr15 min
W-phase
20-50 min
5-7 min
5-20 min
Shakemaps
ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06
shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the
focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have
propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the
amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San
Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity.
ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has
also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have
substantially better station control.
TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
Modelos de Fonte Finita
Hayes et al., SRL 2011
Sismo TO
Tempo
Redes Globais
Mecanismo Focal
Estimativa de danos
Sismo TO
Redes Regionais
Portugal
3 min 5 min
Falha finita
2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min
Hipocentro
5-15 min
< 1 min
Magnitude
5-20 min
2-3 min
30 min 1 hr15 min
>20 min
> 2 hr
5-10 min
20 min – 10 hr
W-phase
20-50 min
5-7 min
5-20 min
Shakemaps
ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06
shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the
focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have
propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the
amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San
Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity.
ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has
also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have
substantially better station control.
TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
Aviso Antecipado
Project REAKT, FP7
Aviso Antecipado
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33JI929aCS8
Courtesy of Aldo Zollo
T0
PRESTo PLUS Eqk
Epicenter
Vulnerable
Site
S-Waves
Station
Alert Level
Magnitude
Accelerograms P- and S-wavesWindows
Depth
Courtesy of Aldo Zollo
Aviso Antecipado
Aldo Zollo
Did You Feel It?
Wald et al, AG 2012
Did You Feel It
1999 – 2011
1.6 million responses
USA Hazard Map
10%, PGA, 50 yrs
Wald et al, AG 2012
Did You Feel It?
Wald et al, AG 2012
A Terra por dentro
Wiley
Energy Released in Earthquakes
IRIS
Tectónica de placas
USGS
J. Renner
How much energy
does a mega-earthquake release?
Porquê fazer sismologia em tempo real?
Did You Feel It?
Wald et al., AG 2012
3. Porque avança a ciência
Porquê fazer sismologia em tempo real?
4. Porque contribui para o avanço da ciência.
Global CMT
Localização do Hipocentro
Guralp
STA
LTA
• Ondas P
• Picks automáticos
Localização do Hipocentro
• Ondas P
• Picks automáticos
• Agregação de picks
• Actualização
automática
SeisComP3
Hanka et al, ORFEUS Newsletter 2008
Shakemaps
Input
Shakemaps
GMPE
(Groud Motion Prediction Earthquakes)
Shakemaps
Factores de Amplificação
Shakemaps
• Mapas de:
– PGA
– PGV
– PGD
– SA
– Intensidade
shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the
focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have
propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the
amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San
Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity.
ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has
also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have
substantially better station control.
Mecanismo Focal:
Inversões do Tensor Momento
Domingues et al., GJI 2012
Detecção de sismos por Tweets
Earle et al, AG 2012
Redes de MEMS
Micro Electro Mechanical Systems
Sismologia
na era da comunicação digital
Susana Custódio
susana@fc.ul.pt
Kanamori,Nature1997
ESB, 23/Fev/2017
Porquê fazer sismologia em tempo real?
1. Porque reduz os danos materiais e humanos.
es
ties receive the warnings
them with public address
Docomo, AU, Softbank)
receive them (47%)
iders serve
earthquake
location and
hazard
estimated
shaking in your
area
Aviso antecipado, Japão Tohoku 2011
Courtesy of Richard Allen, UC Berkeley
Shakemap, M4.3 LA
Worden et al., BSSA 2010
Shakemap Aviso Antecipado
Porquê fazer sismologia em tempo real?
Bogota, Colombia, M6.2, 2015 Virginia, USA, M5.8, 2011
2. Porque queremos (e esperamos) saber
rapidamente o que se está a passar.
Porquê fazer sismologia em tempo real?
Ellsworth and Beroza
Science, 1995
3. Porque contribui para o avanço da ciência.
Qual a informação que temos disponível
em tempo real?
Ammon et al., SRL 2010
Sismo TO
Tempo
Redes Globais
Sismo TO
Redes Regionais
Portugal
3 min 5 min
2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min
Hipocentro
5-15 min
< 1 min
30 min 1 hr15 min
Sismo TO
Tempo
Redes Globais
Sismo TO
Redes Regionais
Portugal
3 min 5 min
2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min
Hipocentro
5-15 min
< 1 min
Magnitude
5-20 min
2-3 min
30 min 1 hr15 min
Sismo TO
Tempo
Redes Globais
Sismo TO
Redes Regionais
Portugal
3 min 5 min
2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min
Hipocentro
5-15 min
< 1 min
Magnitude
5-20 min
2-3 min
30 min 1 hr15 min
5-7 min
5-20 min
Shakemaps
ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06
shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the
focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have
propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the
amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San
Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity.
ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has
also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have
substantially better station control.
TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
Sismo TO
Tempo
Redes Globais
Estimativa de danos
Sismo TO
Redes Regionais
Portugal
3 min 5 min
2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min
Hipocentro
5-15 min
< 1 min
Magnitude
5-20 min
2-3 min
30 min 1 hr15 min
5-7 min
5-20 min
Shakemaps
ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06
shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the
focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have
propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the
amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San
Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity.
ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has
also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have
substantially better station control.
TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
Sismo TO
Tempo
Redes Globais
Mecanismo Focal
Estimativa de danos
Sismo TO
Redes Regionais
Portugal
3 min 5 min
2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min
Hipocentro
5-15 min
< 1 min
Magnitude
5-20 min
2-3 min
30 min 1 hr15 min
5-10 min
20 min – 10 hr
W-phase
20-50 min
5-7 min
5-20 min
Shakemaps
ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06
shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the
focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have
propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the
amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San
Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity.
ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has
also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have
substantially better station control.
TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
Sismo TO
Tempo
Redes Globais
Mecanismo Focal
Estimativa de danos
Sismo TO
Redes Regionais
Portugal
3 min 5 min
Falha finita
2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min
Hipocentro
5-15 min
< 1 min
Magnitude
5-20 min
2-3 min
30 min 1 hr15 min
>20 min
> 2 hr
5-10 min
20 min – 10 hr
W-phase
20-50 min
5-7 min
5-20 min
Shakemaps
ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06
shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the
focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have
propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the
amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San
Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity.
ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has
also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have
substantially better station control.
TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
Mecanismo Focal:
Inversões do Tensor Momento
Domingues et al., GJI 2012
Sismo TO
Tempo
Redes Globais
Mecanismo Focal
Estimativa de danos
Sismo TO
Redes Regionais
Portugal
3 min 5 min
Falha finita
2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min
Hipocentro
5-15 min
< 1 min
Magnitude
5-20 min
2-3 min
30 min 1 hr15 min
5-7 min
5-20 min
Shakemaps
ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06
shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the
focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have
propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the
amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San
Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity.
ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has
also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have
substantially better station control.
TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
W-phase
20-50 min
>20 min
> 2 hr
5-10 min
20 min – 10 hr
Aviso Antecipado
1.
As primeiras ondas (P)
têm menor amplitude.
2.
As primeiras ondas (P)
contêm informação sobre
a magnitude dos sismos.
Allen et al, 2003
Qual a informação que temos disponível
em tempo real?

Sismologia na era da comunicação digital

  • 1.
    Sismologia na era dacomunicação digital Susana Custódio susana@fc.ul.pt ESB, 22/Fev/2018 Bogota, Colombia, M6.2, 2015 Virginia, USA, M5.8, 2011
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    O que éum sismo ISC, 1960 – present
  • 5.
    O que éum sismo?
  • 6.
    Geração de ondassísmicas L. Matias, FCUL
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Destruição causada porsismos Sichuan, China, M7.9, 2008 Haiti, M7, 2010 Christchurch, New Zealand, M6.3, 2011 Lorca, Espanha, M5.1, 2011
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Perdas humanas eeconómicas [Roger Bilham, Univ Colorado]
  • 12.
    Como reduzir asperdas causadas pelos sismos? REAKT (From an original figure of T. Jordan redrawn by S. Wiemer) Long-term Hazard Mapping Long-term Forecasting Short-term Forecasting Early Warning ShakeMaps & Rapid Loss Aftershock Forecasting Decades Years Days to Minutes Seconds Minutes to Hours Minutes to Days Earthquake
  • 13.
    Estimar os impactosdos sismos Earthquake ferent time scales of the uake process re of by REAL- 1. Fonte 2. Propagação 3. Sítio 4. Vulnerabilidade & Inventário REAKT
  • 14.
    Sismologia em temporeal Long-term Hazard Mapping Long-term Forecasting Short-term Forecasting Early Warning ShakeMaps & Rapid Loss Aftershock Forecasting Decades Years Days to Minutes Seconds Minutes to Hours Minutes to Days Earthquake REAKT (From an original figure of T. Jordan redrawn by S. Wiemer)
  • 15.
    Sismologia em temporeal com dados sísmicos Kanamori, Nature 1997
  • 16.
    Qual a informaçãoque temos disponível em tempo real?
  • 17.
    Localização do Hipocentro(< 1 min) SeisComP3 Hanka et al, ORFEUS Newsletter 2008Guralp
  • 18.
    Shakemaps (5-7 min) showsas a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity. ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have substantially better station control. • ‘Ground Motion Prediction Equations’ (propagação das ondas sísmicas) • Interpolação entre estações
  • 19.
    Antecipar o movimentodo solo Earthquake ferent time scales of the uake process re of by REAL- 1. Fonte 2. Propagação 3. Sítio 4. Vulnerabilidade & Inventário REAKT
  • 20.
    Estimativa de danos PAGER M7.8, IRAN-PAKISTAN BORDER REGION Origin Time: Tue 2013-04-16 10:44:20 UTC (15:14:20 local) Location: 28.11 o N 62.05 o E Depth: 82 km PAGER Version 6 Estimated Fatalities Estimated Economic Losses Created: 7 hours, 31 minutes after earthquake Estimated Population Exposed to Earthquake Shaking ESTIMATED POPULATION EXPOSURE (k = x1000) - -* - -* 135k* 2,600k* 1,682k 377k 2k 0 0 ESTIMATED MODIFIED MERCALLI INTENSITY PERCEIVED SHAKING Not felt Weak Light Moderate Strong Very Strong Severe Violent Extreme POTENTIAL DAMAGE Resistant Structures Vulnerable Structures none none none none none none V. Light Light Light Moderate Moderate Moderate/Heavy Moderate/Heavy Heavy Heavy V. Heavy V. Heavy V. Heavy *Estimated exposure only includes population within the map area. Population Exposure population per ~1 sq. km from Landscan Orange alert level for shaking-related fatalities. Significant casualties are likely and the disaster is potentially widespread. Past events with this alert level have required a regional or national level response. Yellow alert level for economic losses. Some damage is possible. Estimated economic losses are less than 1% of GDP of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Structures: Overall, the population in this region resides in structures that are highly vulnerable to earthquake shaking, though some resistant structures exist. The predominant vulnerable building types are adobe block and unreinforced brick with timber floor construction. Historical Earthquakes (with MMI levels): Date (UTC) Dist. (km) Mag. Max MMI(#) Shaking Deaths 1989-12-07 389 5.9 VIII(127) 0 1994-02-23 339 6.1 VII(508) 6 2003-12-26 386 6.6 IX(70k) 26k Recent earthquakes in this area have caused secondary hazards such as landslides that might have contributed to losses. Selected City Exposure from GeoNames.org MMI City Population VII Khash 70k VI Zahedan 552k VI Iranshahr 131k VI Rudbar 11k
  • 21.
    Sismologia em temporeal Long-term Hazard Mapping Long-term Forecasting Short-term Forecasting Early Warning ShakeMaps & Rapid Loss Aftershock Forecasting Decades Years Days to Minutes Seconds Minutes to Hours Minutes to Days Earthquake REAKT (From an original figure of T. Jordan redrawn by S. Wiemer)
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Aviso Antecipado 1. As primeirasondas (P) têm menor amplitude. 2. As primeiras ondas (P) contêm informação sobre a magnitude dos sismos. Allen et al, 2003
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
    REDES DE CIDADÃOS “CITIZENEMPOWERED SEISMOLOGY” CROWDSOURCING
  • 27.
    Did You FeelIt? IPMA
  • 28.
    Did You FeelIt? Wald et al, AG 2012 M 4.2, VA M 4.4, CA
  • 29.
    Detecção de sismospor acessos à página do EMSC
  • 30.
    Detecção de sismospor acessos à página do EMSC Bossu et al, AG 2012
  • 31.
    Detecção de sismospor Tweets Earle et al, AG 2012 “earthquake”, “gempa”, “temblor”, “terremoto”, “sismo”
  • 32.
    Redes de MEMS(Micro Electro Mechanical Systems) Quake Catcher Network
  • 33.
    O que éque vamos ver com redes muito densas? Clayton et al
  • 34.
    O que éque vamos ver com redes muito densas? Clayton et al
  • 35.
    O que éque vamos ver com redes muito densas? Clayton et al, AG 2012
  • 39.
  • 40.
    As magnitudes dossismos Zoback and Gorelick, 2012
  • 41.
    Fast Earthquake Warnings Email SMS Radio Fax Telefone Civil Protection W arnings [ operator validation] Delay after Origin Time: 3m40s Delay after 1º record: 3m31s Delay after minimum set of records (10): 2m43s SeiscomP 2.6, SEISAN 8.1 (modified) and in-house software Portugal: Hipocentro e Magnitude Imagem cedida por F. Carrilho, IPMA
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.
    Alguns links… • IPMA: –https://www.ipma.pt/pt/geofisica/sismologia/ • EMSC: – http://www.emsc-csem.org – http://www.citizenseismology.eu/index.html#materials • USGS: – http://earthquake.usgs.gov
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
  • 48.
  • 49.
    Um século desismos Ammon et al., SRL 2010
  • 50.
    Detecção de sismospor Tweets Earle et al, AG 2012
  • 51.
    W phase: CMT(Centroid Moment Tensor) Duputel et al, preliminary results for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake
  • 52.
  • 53.
    W-phase W phase sourceinversion group http://wphase.unistra.fr/ Onda de longo período (100 – 1000 s)
  • 54.
  • 55.
    Modelação de FontesSísmicas: Inversões Source
  • 56.
    Source Modelação de FontesSísmicas: Inversões
  • 57.
    Source Propagação das ondas Modelaçãode Fontes Sísmicas: Inversões
  • 58.
  • 59.
  • 60.
  • 61.
    W phase: CMT(Centroid Moment Tensor) Duputel et al, preliminary results for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake
  • 62.
    W phase: CMT(Centroid Moment Tensor) Duputel et al, preliminary results for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake
  • 63.
  • 64.
  • 65.
    W phase: CMT(Centroid Moment Tensor)
  • 66.
    Actualização dos Shakemapse dos danos previstos Mapas de velocidade de pico cumulativa Terashake
  • 67.
    Human and economiclosses [Roger Bilham, Univ Colorado] This is how much we borrowed from Troika
  • 68.
    Qual a informaçãoque temos disponível em tempo real?
  • 69.
    Portugal: Factores deAmplificação Teves-Costa et al, 2010
  • 70.
  • 71.
    Determinação de Magnitudes SeisComp3 Hankaet al, ORFEUS Newsletter 2008
  • 72.
    Mecanismo Focal: Inversões doTensor Momento Source Propagação das ondas
  • 73.
    Sismo TO Tempo Redes Globais Estimativade danos Sismo TO Redes Regionais Portugal 3 min 5 min 2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min Hipocentro 5-15 min < 1 min Magnitude 5-20 min 2-3 min 30 min 1 hr15 min W-phase 20-50 min 5-7 min 5-20 min Shakemaps ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06 shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity. ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have substantially better station control. TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
  • 74.
    Modelos de FonteFinita Hayes et al., SRL 2011
  • 75.
    Sismo TO Tempo Redes Globais MecanismoFocal Estimativa de danos Sismo TO Redes Regionais Portugal 3 min 5 min Falha finita 2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min Hipocentro 5-15 min < 1 min Magnitude 5-20 min 2-3 min 30 min 1 hr15 min >20 min > 2 hr 5-10 min 20 min – 10 hr W-phase 20-50 min 5-7 min 5-20 min Shakemaps ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06 shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity. ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have substantially better station control. TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
  • 76.
  • 77.
    Aviso Antecipado http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33JI929aCS8 Courtesy ofAldo Zollo T0 PRESTo PLUS Eqk Epicenter Vulnerable Site S-Waves Station Alert Level Magnitude Accelerograms P- and S-wavesWindows Depth Courtesy of Aldo Zollo
  • 78.
  • 79.
    Did You FeelIt? Wald et al, AG 2012 Did You Feel It 1999 – 2011 1.6 million responses USA Hazard Map 10%, PGA, 50 yrs
  • 80.
    Wald et al,AG 2012
  • 81.
    Did You FeelIt? Wald et al, AG 2012
  • 82.
    A Terra pordentro Wiley
  • 83.
    Energy Released inEarthquakes IRIS
  • 84.
  • 85.
    How much energy doesa mega-earthquake release?
  • 86.
    Porquê fazer sismologiaem tempo real? Did You Feel It? Wald et al., AG 2012 3. Porque avança a ciência
  • 87.
    Porquê fazer sismologiaem tempo real? 4. Porque contribui para o avanço da ciência. Global CMT
  • 88.
    Localização do Hipocentro Guralp STA LTA •Ondas P • Picks automáticos
  • 89.
    Localização do Hipocentro •Ondas P • Picks automáticos • Agregação de picks • Actualização automática SeisComP3 Hanka et al, ORFEUS Newsletter 2008
  • 90.
  • 91.
  • 92.
  • 93.
    Shakemaps • Mapas de: –PGA – PGV – PGD – SA – Intensidade shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity. ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have substantially better station control.
  • 94.
    Mecanismo Focal: Inversões doTensor Momento Domingues et al., GJI 2012
  • 95.
    Detecção de sismospor Tweets Earle et al, AG 2012
  • 96.
    Redes de MEMS MicroElectro Mechanical Systems
  • 97.
    Sismologia na era dacomunicação digital Susana Custódio susana@fc.ul.pt Kanamori,Nature1997 ESB, 23/Fev/2017
  • 98.
    Porquê fazer sismologiaem tempo real? 1. Porque reduz os danos materiais e humanos. es ties receive the warnings them with public address Docomo, AU, Softbank) receive them (47%) iders serve earthquake location and hazard estimated shaking in your area Aviso antecipado, Japão Tohoku 2011 Courtesy of Richard Allen, UC Berkeley Shakemap, M4.3 LA Worden et al., BSSA 2010 Shakemap Aviso Antecipado
  • 99.
    Porquê fazer sismologiaem tempo real? Bogota, Colombia, M6.2, 2015 Virginia, USA, M5.8, 2011 2. Porque queremos (e esperamos) saber rapidamente o que se está a passar.
  • 100.
    Porquê fazer sismologiaem tempo real? Ellsworth and Beroza Science, 1995 3. Porque contribui para o avanço da ciência.
  • 101.
    Qual a informaçãoque temos disponível em tempo real? Ammon et al., SRL 2010
  • 102.
    Sismo TO Tempo Redes Globais SismoTO Redes Regionais Portugal 3 min 5 min 2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min Hipocentro 5-15 min < 1 min 30 min 1 hr15 min
  • 103.
    Sismo TO Tempo Redes Globais SismoTO Redes Regionais Portugal 3 min 5 min 2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min Hipocentro 5-15 min < 1 min Magnitude 5-20 min 2-3 min 30 min 1 hr15 min
  • 104.
    Sismo TO Tempo Redes Globais SismoTO Redes Regionais Portugal 3 min 5 min 2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min Hipocentro 5-15 min < 1 min Magnitude 5-20 min 2-3 min 30 min 1 hr15 min 5-7 min 5-20 min Shakemaps ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06 shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity. ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have substantially better station control. TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
  • 105.
    Sismo TO Tempo Redes Globais Estimativade danos Sismo TO Redes Regionais Portugal 3 min 5 min 2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min Hipocentro 5-15 min < 1 min Magnitude 5-20 min 2-3 min 30 min 1 hr15 min 5-7 min 5-20 min Shakemaps ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06 shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity. ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have substantially better station control. TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
  • 106.
    Sismo TO Tempo Redes Globais MecanismoFocal Estimativa de danos Sismo TO Redes Regionais Portugal 3 min 5 min 2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min Hipocentro 5-15 min < 1 min Magnitude 5-20 min 2-3 min 30 min 1 hr15 min 5-10 min 20 min – 10 hr W-phase 20-50 min 5-7 min 5-20 min Shakemaps ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06 shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity. ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have substantially better station control. TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
  • 107.
    Sismo TO Tempo Redes Globais MecanismoFocal Estimativa de danos Sismo TO Redes Regionais Portugal 3 min 5 min Falha finita 2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min Hipocentro 5-15 min < 1 min Magnitude 5-20 min 2-3 min 30 min 1 hr15 min >20 min > 2 hr 5-10 min 20 min – 10 hr W-phase 20-50 min 5-7 min 5-20 min Shakemaps ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06 shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity. ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have substantially better station control. TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps
  • 108.
    Mecanismo Focal: Inversões doTensor Momento Domingues et al., GJI 2012
  • 109.
    Sismo TO Tempo Redes Globais MecanismoFocal Estimativa de danos Sismo TO Redes Regionais Portugal 3 min 5 min Falha finita 2 hr1 hr30 min15 min5 min Hipocentro 5-15 min < 1 min Magnitude 5-20 min 2-3 min 30 min 1 hr15 min 5-7 min 5-20 min Shakemaps ShakeMap Manual DRAFT: Version 1.0 6/19/06 shows as a topographic low on the ShakeMap intensity Map (Figure 2.8) and second, the focusing of strong motion to the southeast, the direction the earthquake rupture appears to have propagated. The offset of the strongest shaking to the southeast from the epicenter, and the amplification within the basin of sediments underlying Napa and along the northern shore of San Pablo Bay are also clear on the map of instrumental intensity. ShakeMap quality strong motion instrumentation coverage in the San Francisco Bay area has also substantially improved because the 2000 Napa earthquake, so future earthquakes will have substantially better station control. TECHNICAL MANUAL 64 Recent Example ShakeMaps W-phase 20-50 min >20 min > 2 hr 5-10 min 20 min – 10 hr
  • 110.
    Aviso Antecipado 1. As primeirasondas (P) têm menor amplitude. 2. As primeiras ondas (P) contêm informação sobre a magnitude dos sismos. Allen et al, 2003
  • 111.
    Qual a informaçãoque temos disponível em tempo real?