Ifad cambodia overview of the portfolio jan2017

1. Overview of Cambodia Portfolio and Partnership
IFAD-Kingdom of Cambodia Country Portfolio Review
Sihanoukville, 24 – 26 January 2017

2. Background
• Cambodia join IFAD in
1992, shortly after 1991
Paris Peace Agreement.
• It starts from when
agricultural fields were
mined and
reconstruction had yet
to begin. It has been a
long way since then.

4. • IFAD operations is guided by Country Strategic Opportunities
Programme (COSOP)
• The COSOP strategic objective has been shifted to meet the
challenges the country faces today.
1998 – 2007:
First COSOP
Agriculture and
rural development
within Seila
Decentralize
programme
ADESS, CBRDP,
RPRP
1995 – 98:
No COSOP
Livestock sector
APIP
2008 -2012:
Second COSOP
Agriculture and
Rural
Development
within D&D
Framework
TSSD, PADEE
2013-2018:
Third COSP
Market, CC, rural
extension
service, and
programme
support
ASPIRE, AIMS ,
SRET
Peace Reconciliation
Subnational
admin reform
Market-led
growth

5. Distribution of Household Poverty Rate

9. Introduction to the Programme
Closed Loans Active Loans
• Agriculture Productivity Improvement
Project (APIP): 1997-2005
• Agricultural Developmnet Support Project to
Sella (ADES): 2000-2006
• Community-based Rural Development
Project in Kampong Thom and Kampot
(CBRDP): 2001-2010
• Rural Poverty Reduction Project in Prey Veng
and Svay Rieng (RPRP): 2004-2011
• Rural Livelihoods Improvement Project in
Kratie, Preah Vihear and Ratanakiri (RuLIP):
2007-2015
• Tonle Sap Poverty Reduction and
Smallholder Development Project (TSSD):
2010-2018
• Project for Agricultural Development and
Economic Empowerment (PADEE): 2012-
2018
• Agriculture Services Programme for
Innovation, Resilience and Extension
(ASPIRE): 2015-2021
• Scaling up Renewable Technology (SRET):
2016-2020
• Accelerating Inclusive Market for Small
holder (AIMS): 2017-2022

11. Timeline overview –3 COSOPs
(1993-1997) (1998-2012) (2013-2017)
Projects 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
APIP
ADESS
CBRDP
RPRP
RULIP
TSSP
PADEE
ASPIRE
AIMS

12. Intervention Modality
• Provide Social Capital to
local farmers
• Provide Financial Capital to
poor farmers
• Link extension service for
farm profitability
• Productive and Market
infrastructure

13. – SO1 Poor smallholders enabled to take
advantage of market opportunities
– SO2 Poor rural households and
communities increase resilience to
climate and other shocks;
– SO3 Poor rural households improve
access to strengthened rural service
delivery by Government, civil society and
private sector agencies.
COSOP has 3 Strategic Objectives

14. PROJECT 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
TSSD
PADEE
ASPIRE
S-RET
AIMS
COSOP IMPLEMENTATION YEARS
Where will the current COSOP results come
from?

15. • 4.0 is “satisfactory”
• TSSD is approaching overall satisfactory
ratings after a weak start
• PADEE has rated satisfactory overall
throughout
Category TSSD PADEE TSSD PADEE TSSD PADEE
Quality ofProjectManagement 2.8 4.0 3.5 4.7 3.8 4.5 4.11
Quality ofFinancial Management 3.6 4.2 3.4 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.06
Targetting 3.0 4.0 3.5 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.30
Quality ofResults 2.7 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.3 4.5 4.15
Impactand Sustainability 2.3 4.0 2.6 4.0 3.0 4.6 4.12
Overall Average 2.9 4.0 3.3 4.3 3.7 4.5 4.14
Region
2013 2014 2015
Averages per category extracted from Cambodia Performance Dashboard
Region
4.0 4.2 4.3
Project Supervision Report Ratings of Active Projects
Dashboard data: Supervision Ratings

16. Strengths (above-average
performance)
• Targeting Effectiveness
• Counterpart funds
• Poverty Focus
• Empowerment
• Quality of Beneficiary
Participation
• Climate and Environment Focus
Weaknesses (below average
performance)
• Exit Strategy
• Compliance with Procurement
• Performance of M&E
• Innovation and Learning
• Coherence between AWPB and
implementation
• Overall implementation
progress
Findings of Country Portfolio Review

17. • Assumption: Full impact occurs when a household has
participated in project activities for 3 years
• Assumption: about 75% of participating households
will achieve the expected impact
Project Type
Outreach Impact Outreach Impact
PADEE / S-RET IGRF 49,200 36,900 49,200 36,900
TSSD LIG 27,314 20,486 27,314 20,486
ASPIRE Smallholders 9,000 6,750 100,000 75,000
AIMS Value Chain - 80,000 60,000
TOTAL 85,514 64,136 256,514 192,386
2018 2021
PROJECTION OF OUTREACHANDIMPACT
Effeciency
Total cost Impact Beneficiary
PADEE/SRET 43 000 000 36 900
TSSD 55 000 000 20 486
ASPIRE 52 000 000 75 000
AIMS 45 000 000 60 000
Total 195 000 000 192 386
Cost per beneficiary 1 013.59

18. Way forward
1. Focus on result: Adoption, income generation,
food security, and nutrition.
2. Focus on practicality, efficiency, less ambitious plan
and reach more beneficiary to great extent.
3. Focus on Quality Control mechanism
4. Focus on sustainability, exit strategy and scaling up
5. Improve MIS system and online reporting.
6. Improve feasibility of project operation
7. Generate more multi-media knowledge products
8. Cross project support and learning

19. • ADB
• FAO
• WB
• IRRI
• CIAT
• APRACA
• UNDP
• USAID
• iDE
• AVSF
• GIZ
• WFP
• IFPRI
• CIPA
• MTCP
• Procasur
• SNV
• UNOPS
Our Partners

20. Thank You
Meng Sakphouseth
Country Programme Officer
PMD/APR/IFAD
Email: m.sakphouseth@ifad.org
H/P: +855 15 904 504