Persuasive Essay On Human Cloning Debate

Persuasive Essay On Human Cloning
According to CNN news "On January 23, 2003 Clonaid claims to have cloned the first baby boy.
The baby was allegedly cloned from tissue taken from the Japanese couple's comatose 2–year–old
boy, who was killed in an accident in 2001. Clonaid has never provided physical evidence of the
cloning." Cloning technology is complicated and only a selected few are legally able to conduct
research in this field. All cloning research has to be passed by the federal government and be
approved before the research starts to be conducted. "Much of what researchers learn about human
disease comes from studying animal models such as mice. Often, animal models are genetically
engineered to carry disease causing mutations in their genes. Creating these transgenic animals is a
time–intensive process that requires trial–and–error and several generations of breeding. Cloning
could help reduce the time needed to make a transgenic animal model, and the result would be a
population of genetically identical animals for study." (Models of Disease) Cloning technology can
be used for medical purposes, but also for egotistical reasons. For example, to take over the world,
human organ farming, illegal human organ...show more content...
Because these are processes that stem cells do naturally, they can be manipulated to repair
damaged or diseased organs and tissue. But stem cells transferred from one person to another
(such as in a bone marrow transplant) are seen as foreign and they usually trigger an immune
response. Some researchers are looking at cloning as want to create stem cells that are genetically
identical to an individual. These cells could then be used for medical purposes, possibly even
growing whole organs. And stem cells cloned from someone with a disease could be grown in
culture and studies to help researchers understand the disease and develop treatments." (__Source__)
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

To clone or not to clone, a question under debate not only hundreds but also thousands of years.
Cloning is to genetically make an identical copy of an object, a cell or a whole organism. Identical
twins can be considered nature's own way of cloning. As per the publication in Basic Science
Partnership, although experiments on cloning of plants and bacteria have been carried on for
decades, the major breakthrough in science was the birth of Dolly the sheep, on July 05, 1996, after
which many other animals were cloned, including cows and even mice. In 1997 two Rhesus
monkeys were cloned from the 8–cell stage in a laboratory of Don Wolf at Oregon Regional Primate
Research Centre and in the same year President Clinton signed a five–year ban to use federal funds
for human cloning. (Web)...show more content...
They even supported a legal ban to implant a human cloned embryo for the purpose of
reproduction as documents revealed the health risks involved in reproductive cloning as was
observed in animal studies. Simultaneously, they further advised active involvement of the public
in discussions carried out by the scientific community to better understand the ethical side of
human cloning. The AAAS believed that cloning analysis and exploration should be carried
forward under close scrutiny by the federal government over public and private sectors. (Web) The
question arises here is, should we keep it till plants, animals and organisms for the benefit of
mankind, to discover and create new medicines, antibiotics which can in turn eradicate diseases that
have created havoc in certain parts of the world or go ahead with human cloning and as some say "
Play

Persuasive Essay On Cloning
The thought of cloning human beings can be exciting for some but scary for others. Some people
find cloning to be one the most spectacular invention while others think it is not a great idea to
clone themselves. Another issue here is that some people feel that we if we are cloning human
beings, we will be taking the role of God. What exactly does this means? Well, people who have a
religious background feel that this can be stepping out of religion boundaries because it's scientists
that will be involved in the process instead of God and this is not done naturally. People have viewed
cloning is just making another human being but what about artificial insemination? "Artificial
insemination have been used to create children who would not have existed without help or
interference of modern science"...show more content...
But without this method a lot of women and men will not be able to have a family because of
medical issues. Just like anything else that is unnatural such as antibiotics, vaccinations, surgery,
hair dye, people who are not against it feel that those who are should object to these things. Most
people think that we don't know how our child will turn out and what qualities they will have. But
this is not so true anymore. Those who are creating a child through sexual intercourse can actually
find out now certain qualities of their future children. And with the IVF technology, it makes it
possible which embryo to implant after the DNA analysis is performed. "It is even possible, with
preimplantation diagnosis (PID) to implant one identical twin and freeze the other future use"
(Anderson). We also are not able to predict everything that will happen with the person that is
created. Predictions can be made but it is not possible to know exactly what will happen. There was
a poll that was taken by CNN, about 7% Americans wanted to cloned. Therefore, there are people
still not agreeing with

This essay will focus on reproductive human cloning particularly whether or not cloning is
unethical as the clone would only be a means to the parent(s)' end. This is a difficult question to
answer as I believe there is a significant lack of critical discussion between this proposed Kantian
view and other moral theories. This Kantian moral view is known as the duty of 'human dignity' and
takes on the form of instrumentalism.
I believe the lack of ethical discussion is due to the difficult in stating or finding, concrete and
relative, counter–arguments against this theory which halts any further discussion. Critics of this
argument have stated that parents have kids for different instrumental reasons some examples are, to
improve the relationship...show more content...
Scientists will only have the upmost integrity, respect and control in their experiments. Only lawful
research and experiments can take place and only in therapeutic cloning techniques, the end result
would be to not clone humans but better understand disease and create cures. This rule in some way
has an underlying counter–argument against human cloning as it points towards the use and
acceptance of therapeutic cloning. I think there would be significant knowledge gained from the
observations of therapeutic research into nuclear programming, cellular aging and the human
genome. This view has a high utility score as the new and potential discoveries could greatly
improve human

The peaceful world today had faced countless numbers of conflicts and changes before it became
the world everyone knows. There are tens of thousands of wars created by humans in the history of
the world, not including the one that has yet to occur (Oakley, 2013). In order to win a war,
weapons are indeed a necessity. Numerous pieces of technology, which can be deadly, are being
made daily. Thecloning of animals is one of the most advanced technologies in history. This may
seem astonishing for sources of food, but humans will not stop here. The more challenging task is to
clone a human. As interesting as it may sound, there is always a downside to everything, which
people do not see as an issue. Humans tend to utilize the most out of everything. If the cloning of a
human is no longer a fantasy, it would be one of the most terrifying disasters in history. Therefore, a
study or research on human cloning should never exist because it will decrease the value of human
life and cause many problems to the world.
Human cloning may be a fun subject for people to think about, but it can cause problems to
everyday life. Unless it was during World War II, more people are born each day than they tend to
die. There are currently over seven billion people alive today, which will drastically increase in the
near future ("World Population," 2017). Numberless people today are already living in poverty. If
human cloning is no longer science fiction, it will only speed up the rate of

Human cloning was successfully tested twenty years ago but on a sheep. Surprisingly the
experiment was successful and from that point on human cloning became a widely debated topic.
Human cloning has developed many different debate topics within it. Some say it is an unethical
procedure and it conflicts with many beliefs; safety for women is one of the very important topics and
cloning some say that this related to abortion because it is a destruction of an embryo. The
government should ban human reproductive cloning because it violates ethical beliefs, women are
put at risk, and embryos are destroyed for the purpose of the procedure. Human cloning is an
unethical procedure that violated many personal beliefs. There are two main sides in the...show more
content...
Human cloning actually does not lead to the clone being an exact replica of the donor (Magney).
The clone will have some aspects that are the same of the donor but will not be exact replicas.
Another debated topic is whether or not the clone will make the same mistakes as the donor. The
clones have their own minds that help them to decide what is bad or not just like normal humans
(Magney). These clones may make some of the same mistakes as apart to their own free choice but
ultimately it would not make the same mistakes as the donor. It boils down to what the clone is
taught and grows up learning which leads them to make their own decisions. Along with the
unethical beliefs, the procedure is very dangerous for women and puts many at risk. The physical
concerns for women are numerous after going through this procedure. The procedure is painful in
itself along with the need for many egg donations. Egg donations can have significant impacts on
women (Cloning a Risk to Women). Women are given drugs during the process. Numerous
treatments are given to the women. The extraction is also very

Persuasive Essay Against Human Cloning
Against Human Cloning Human cloning is a highly controversial and divisive topic, so most people
either feel strongly for or against it. There are many common misconceptions about cloning, such as
the idea that when someone is cloned, the clone appears exactly like the subject. This is not the case;
cloning is done by replacing the nucleus of an unfertilized egg and then transferred to a woman's
uterus to be carried out like a normal pregnancy. The only thing that the originalhuman being and the
clone would share is DNA. The clone could grow up to be a completely different person as the
original human being, simply inside a body that looks the same. Therefore, it is not as if cloning
could be used to create an army of clones of a single person like Hitler. However, human cloning is
still morally wrong for many reasons. Many people who are in favor of human cloning will argue
that cloning would really benefit the clone, because the alternative for said clone is never existing
at all. However, cloning will actually be harmful for the clone. We do not have the cloning process
perfected, especially each time it is used on a species for the first time, and it would therefore do
more harm than good. For example, Scottish scientists have been able to clone sheep, but the...show
more content...
Because the cloning process is not perfected and in most cases leads to disabilities and deformities
in the animal clones, cloning is physically harmful to the clone. Consider the Non–Identity Problem
in this case: not existing at all is better than existing with a shortened lifespan and with disabilities.
Essentially, bringing something into existence that only suffers is worse than not bringing it into
existence at all. Living with a predisposition to fatal diseases such as cancer, a weaker immune
system, or an almost guaranteed shorter lifespan sounds much more miserable than not living a life at

Man is nearly the most advanced creature on earth with an impeccable mind capable of endless
creativity. However, there are two significant things that since the dawn of time, people always
desired to dominate: time and death. With the strong development of science, humanity found an
amazing solution to this puzzle: cloning, the "aggregate of genetically identical cells or organisms
asexually produced by or from a single progenitor cell or organism" ("Clone", n.d.). Whether or not
human beings should be cloned is a controversial problem around the world, and especially whether
or not cloning is worth any consequences. The research of human cloning should be a priority
because of its incredible benefits in advancing the process of human evolution,the foundation to
reach the life without death and disease, and encouraging reproductive technologies, such as organ
transplants. This innovation will turn human history to a new era without the limit of time,
furthering human abilities. The first aspect that needs mentioning is advancing the process of human
evolution through cloning. Humans have developed both physically and mentally since the
beginning of the species: humans have become stronger, smarter, more advanced to adapt and
improve their harsh life. In additon to the development of the whole race, there are individuals who
make essential revolution with their inventions, such as Thomas Edison's light bulb, Otto Hahn and
Fritz Stassmann's nuclear fission, and the modern internet by Tim Berners–Lee ( Ratner, 2016).
These are all people with a unique mind and amazing talents who have enormous contributions to
society, however, those genius cannot continue to create more invention with the limit of their
lifetime. Therefore, it would be a remarkable change if their genes can be preserved to strengthen the
process of new inventions. The elimination of time will be a significant turn for humans, since it
could boost the human evolution in the fastest way. The success of human cloning will contribute a
huge amount of not only intelligence to the process of human evolution, but also to human labor, as
people will not have to risk their life for a science test or special duties. Furthermore, human cloning
is the

In the past 30 years, humans have started putting more attention to cloning. Animals, and especially
cloning humans. The very first being cloned, was a sheep by the name of "Dolly" in 1997. The
scientists who created Dolly, however, agreed that they had no intentions of ever cloning a human
being. There are two types of cloning, one occurs naturally for some humans, for this version is how
twins, triplets, etc. are born. The one other form of cloning is more scientific, which is called nuclear
transplantation. As human technology advances, what will the world's perspective on human be?
Human cloning has been on the minds of humans for years, and now is even possible. What we
normally think of when it comes to cloning, is an exact replica of another person. Cloning has been
thought of to bring back extinct species, for example, the mammoth or the Tasmanian tiger (Which
was cloned once, but unfortunately died of lung failure 4 hours after birth.) Even while cloning is
possible, an interview with the creators of "Dolly" stated that " ... It took 277 attempt...show more
content...
One thing may be infertility, and many people may be infertile. They (Those who support it for this
reason) say that they can have children if they donate samples for cloning. This can make couples
feel much more human being able to have children. Another reason is something already argued on
dozens of times, Organ farming. The people who organ farm say they're not going to clone fetus' and
then kill them when the organ is "Ripe". Rather, they're cloning the organ itself, for people who have
injuries such as burns, organ failure, injuries, etc. One more reason, immortality. Humans – if cloned
– could be one more step closer to immortality (Never die/live longer than humanly possible). With
organ replacements widely available, people could continue lives and enjoy life. If human cloning
were legal, humanity may just be gods

Human Cloning Persuasive Essay
Human cloning has the potential to cure cancer, replace organs, eliminate infertility, and
significantly increase recovery time for patients who have experienced traumatic events. Despite all
these groundbreaking benefits, human cloning has not been applied to the medical world. Human
cloning has failed to be accepted, because of the ethical issues it presents. Human cloning brings up
the issue of religion and whether or not it is allowed throughout different practices. It asks questions
such as, do clones have souls, is cloning equivalent to immortality, will it be costly, is it guaranteed
to produce results. While the benefits of human cloning are revolutionary, the side–effects can be
damaging.
While human cloning can be a very broad topic, it is easy to separate it into two groups: therapeutic
human cloning, and reproductive human cloning. Reproductive human cloning is most common of
the two. Everyone's mind immediately goes to Dolly the sheep. In 1996, Dolly became the first
mammal to be cloned from an adult somatic cell (Pros). After the cloning of Dolly, cloning humans
was the next logical step. The basic process of reproductive cloning for animals and humans is
essentially the same. It begins with extracting the subjects DNA...show more content...
The positive effects of human cloning could change the world of medicine, but human cloning is not
yet guaranteed. One of the major issues with therapeutic cloning, and reproductive cloning for that
matter, is the cost. It could be too expensive for the average man to pay for cloning his heart or
curing his daughter's leukemia. While cost is extremely important, the quality of cloning must be
excellent. Scientists and researchers must perfect cloning before actually using it on patients. There
is a lot of room for

Argumentative Essay On Human Cloning
Human Cloning
While we have the state of the art technologies and the result of a successful cloning of the
infamous lamb known as Dolly, should we take the next step and begin human cloning? If I were to
carry the super DNA that scientists are wanting to explore in the lab, would I allow myself to be
duplicated? Absolutely not! Replicating a human is not only wrong on ethical grounds but also a
threat to our existence! The biggest concern is how far will humans attempt to control nature?
Therefore, I do not believe that cloning should be allowed based on my teleological outlook.
Diversity diminishes, and the human population decreases. It shifts the process of natural
evolution. For hundreds of generations, our ancestors developed through a gradual process of
changes from their ability to compete, survive, and reproduce. By hindering this process our specie
will suffer. The negative outcomes are far greater than the positives. Maybe cloning can and will
allow for possible answers for diseases and cures, however it still interferes with the natural order of
life; the human life–cycle. We must put into consideration the time and money spent on the
experiment with the cloned lamb. After years of several failed attempts prior to creating Dolly, can
we, as humans, walk with a clean conscious knowing the amount of safety and harm caused toward a
developing child–clone and those involved in the process (DNA holder, scientists, etc.)? This paints
a clear picture of how cloning a human will be far more difficult, dangerous, and unethical. As a
mother, I strongly oppose of this idea due to the consequences of how we, as a society will view
these cloners, and how these cloners will affect my children's lives. Will my children lead a
normal life if they are deemed having a weak and undesirable DNA? Undoubtedly, a loss of
individuality and diversity is created. Our genetic make–up is what makes us unique. It gives an
individual a sense of self and distinctiveness. Eventually, the population starts to lack uniqueness.
Two people wouldn't be sitting down having a conversation on their diverse backgrounds, rather
everyone else will have almost the same thoughts and ideas. How can a society grow and learn
about all the

Write A Persuasive Essay On Human Cloning
Human cloning has always been a highly controversial issue. To be able to clone a human or not be
able to? That is the question. Some believe human cloning is the next step in science and should be
something worthy of experimenting on; conversely, others think human cloning is unethical and
shouldn't be something scientists should be studying. Human cloning could have many problems and
shouldn't be experimented on.
To clone a human would be more difficult to do than any other mammals. In an egg, spindle proteins
are located near the egg's nucleus. The removal of the egg's nucleus, which is mandatory for cloning
to to work, would result in the loss of the spindle proteins. And unlike other mammals, our spindle
proteins don't spread around the cell. Consequently, this would interfere with cell division and the
cloning would not be successful. In order for us to clone a human, we must find a way to get rid of
the egg's nucleus without destroying the spindle proteins. Since the spindle proteins are so close to
the nucleus, it would practically be impossible. Good luck with that, scientists....show more content...
Usually only 1% to 10% of all cloned embryos end up maturing into a baby. "It's like sending your
baby up in a rocket knowing there's a 50–50 chance it's going to blow up," says Dr. Robert Lanza.
Why take the risk? For example, Dolly the sheep was the only successful clone out of 277 eggs.
Cc, a cloned cat, was the only successful one out of 87 cloned eggs. That isn't much better either. If
cloning a sheep had such a high failure rate, think about how likely a successful human clone would

The term "Cloning" has, over time, come to encompass a number of sciences and bio technologies
that have emerged from technology developed while aiming for the main and original goal of
cloning itself, IE "to propagate as a clone" or "to make an identical copy" of a living organism,
which is the actual definition of cloning per se. The main cloning technologies can be put into three
categories, Reproductive, Therapeutic and Genetic cloning.
The issues of whether or not cloning is ethical, safe or even actually possible are hotly debated in the
scientific, political and religious communities. The amount of debate that has taken place and
regulation placed on the scientific community around cloning is so great, it's a testimony to the level
of impact this biotechnology has on society, all in spite of the fact that it's still not known whether or
not the most feared type of cloning, Human Reproductive Cloning, is actually possible....show more
content...
The idea too, that a human created outside of the natural processes of reproduction would be
considered an "abomination" in God's eyes. Quoting from the Old Testament of the Holy Bible,
John 3:5, "Jesus answered, 'Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he
cannot enter the kingdom of God'" Terms like "against God's will" or "playing God" go some way
to describing the outcry from these groups who clearly see the scientific community engaged in
cloning activity as overstepping the boundaries of what's ethically acceptable when it comes to man
attempting to "emulate

ManThe man is the most advanced creature on earth with an impeccable mind capable of endless
creativity. However, there are two significant things that, since the dawn of time, people have always
desired to dominate: time and death. With the strong development of science, humanity has found an
amazing solution to this puzzle: cloning, the "aggregate of genetically identical cells or organisms
asexually produced by or from a single progenitor cell or organism." ("Clone," n.d.) Whether or not
human beings should be cloned is a controversial issue around the world. In my opinion, the research
on human cloning should be a priority because of its incredible benefits in advancing the process of
human evolution, an opportunity mankind to restart...show more content...
Furthermore, human cloning is an opportunity for people to choose the most desirable genes for
their generation; parents can decide the best traits for their children. The scientists can involve to
choose the strongest genes between the parent for their child, and exclude the defective genes,
hence, they are able to create a new healthy body without disease, and malformation. The second
benefit of human cloning is an opportunity for mankind to restart their incomplete life. The amount
of young people who die because of accident is increasing with the degradation of the environment,
"more than 3 million people die from vaccine–preventable diseases each year. Approximately 1.5
million of these deaths are in children less than 5 years old." (Philadelphia, 2014) It is the
sorrowful loss for the victim's family and the world for they are the future of the world and should
be protected by the government. Therefore, human cloning can be the best solution for the recreation
of the dead person. With this technology, scientists can take the cells from the deceased people to
clone him or her. For example,
A boy graduates from high school at age 18. He goes to a pool party to celebrate. He confuses the
deep end and shallow end and dives head first into the pool, breaking his neck and becoming a
quadriplegic. At age 19 he has his first urinary tract infection because of an indwelling urinary
catheter and continues

ABEER SHARMA
Paper–2
X E:– Persuasive Essay
Human Cloning Should Not Be Sanctioned Under Any Circumstances.
Albeit not everybody would concur, I optate to argue that "Human Cloning" is erroneous! The noetic
conception of someone playing god and engendering life from human DNA outrages me. No Matter
how many times scientists fail to engender a plenarily engendered human copy they still don't give
up to pursue this desired goal. The first human embryos were unsuccessful as the embryos cellular
division ceased after only 6 cells had divided making the experiment a failure for the scientists. I
feel vigorously about this issue and in my opinion I don't optically discern why "Human Cloning" is
subsidiary for us humans, and how it benefits...show more content...
The scientist that availed engender Dolly argued that she had astringent arthritis, which caused her
death. But after many investigations and a post mortem examination it was revealed that Dolly
suffered from Internal Lung Cancer, which was prevalent in many sheep breeds. Dolly's breed,
the Fin Dorset sheep, has a life expectancy of eleven to twelve years, so many notionally theorize
that she additionally died of a genetically age life expectancy of six years which designates that
Dolly's was only designated to live till she was six. So to bring my point forward, what would
transpire if humans were cloned? The most immensely colossal worry that many people have in
today's society is that if scientists are able to clone humans, the cloned human could have many
quandaries and suffer a short life, but even more people argue that it would have an effect on the
man and women offering their cells to be cloned.
One of the stranger reasons that I optate to bring forward is the conception of body supersessions
which in my opinion is outlandish and plenarily nonessential. In recent years there have been many
cases of scientists endeavoring to grow a body for someone who has recently been deceased,
denoting the transplantation of the encephalon from the deceased body into the cloned body. It is
now thought of only as science fiction, yet it may someday be a possibility in the distant future.
While it will always be unethical to kill another human to preserve another

Human cloning is the genetically identical copy of a human. Human cloning has a history of not
going as planned and ending up with a lot of death. However, They can also be a huge benefit to our
society. It depends on how much people know about human cloning, and how developed human
cloning is at the time.
Bioethics is the study of the ethical issues emerging from advances in biology and medicine. It is
also moral discernment as it relates to medical policies and practice. In bioethics, the ethics of
cloning refers to a variety of ethical positions regarding the practice and possibilities of cloning,
especially human cloning. While many of these views are religious in origin, the questions raised
by cloning are faced by secular perspectives as well....show more content...
Some opponents of reproductive of reproductive cloning have concerns that technology is not yet
developed enough to be safe, while others emphasize that reproductive cloning could be prone to
abuse and have concerns about how cloned individuals could integrate with families and with society
at large. Religious groups are divided, with some opposing the technology as usurping God's place
and, to the extent embryos are used to, destroying a human life, while others support therapeutic
clonings potential life saving benefits.
One type of Human Cloning is Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer(SCNT). In Somatic Cell Nuclear
Transfer, the nucleus of a somatic cell is taken from a donor and transplanted into a host egg cell,
which had its own genetic material removed previously, making it an enucleated egg. After the donor
somatic cell genetic material is transferred into the host oocyte with a micropipette, the somatic cell
genetic material is fused with the egg using an electric

Human Cloning
Kfir Orgad
Penn Foster College
The cloning of a sheep named Dolly in 1997 sparked a large–scale international debate about the
future of the process of creating genetically identical individuals known as clones. New questions
needed to be addressed now on a legislative level that were never an issue beforehand. Is it possible
to clone human beings? Is it ethical to produce human clones? Is it helpful for science or feasible?
Currently, there are two forms of cloning available for science. The first is therapeutic cloning which
involves the cloning of human embryos for the purpose of studying and advancing science with the
expressed goal of harvesting stem cells for research (Human Genome Project Information, 2008).
...show more content...
On February 27, 1997, the Senate of the United States congress introduced S. 386 to the floor of
the senate for a vote (S.368 1997) . It called for an immediate end to federal funding being used to
fund research regarding the cloning of a human individual. The definition of cloning given in this
bill was "the replication of a human individual by the taking of a cell with genetic material and the
cultivation of the cell through the egg, embryo, fetal, and newborn stages into a new human
individual." (S.368 1997). This bill was read twice on the floor of the senate and is currently being
held up in the Committee on Labor and Human Resources (S.368 1997) . The house also has a
similar bill that is being held in committee until further action will be taken. H.R. 922 was
introduced to the House on March 5, 1997 and was eventually sent to the Committee on Commerce
as well as

Cloning Persuasive Essay
What was once thought to be the content of fiction novels and comic books is now being fully
explored and realized in the cutting edge world of modern science. Scientists now possess the
necessary capabilities and technology to make the process of human cloning a reality. While this is a
controversial and rather sensitive topic, cloning is an innovative practice that has the potential to
vastly improve the lives of unlimited amounts of people. Although cloning may prove to be a
useful remedy for many of today's issues, there are those in the scientific and medical fields who
remain vehemently opposed to its practice. It is for this reason that lawmakers, scientists, and
doctors around the world are currently locked in a fierce standoff...show more content...
Individuals who are afflicted by these diseases die, often within their first four years of life. There
is no viable reason why children should not have the chance to lead full and happy lives, with the
help of cloning technology that reality could be achieved. Those opposed to the practice of human
cloning argue that it is unnatural to create a living being for the sole purpose of study and science.
This is really not the case at all; while some may be asked to participate in experiments for the
betterment of humanity they are not painful or impractical procedures and will only involve taking
DNA samples with little or no inconvenience inflicted upon the subject. Besides occasional testing,
cloned humans would certainly be able to live normal lives. The fact being that the only difference
between them and a regular human is the sequence of their genetic code. Another supplementary
argument can be made on the topic of medical advancements made possible through the cloning
process, mankind will be provided with organs and cells with which human's lives will be saved. If a
person needs an organ transplant the normal means of transplantation would involve the removal of
an organ from another person. This organ could be rejected and many complications could arise,
often with deadly repercussions. Human cloning would involve using the person's own cells that
could be cloned to produce a healthy, normal organ for use in the person. Through this process, there
would be no

Today, we live in a world where anything is possible, and I mean anything. Physicists and engineers
are closer than ever before to creating the world's first hoverboard... who would have thought that
we could all be cruising the streets, levitating! However, on a more serious note, scientists are in the
process of creating human clones – a much debated topic. Its ever spiraling theories continue to
hassle the scientists who are more than keen to find out what would happen if they were to undergo
proper tests. In my opinion, human cloning takes evolution in human science to the next level and
could lead to major breakthroughs in health science and could cure such diseases such as spinal
disease, bone marrow cancer, heart disease and many more....show more content...
Which leads me to my next point in human cloning. What benefits does the practice bring to human
race? Rudolf Jaenisch, a doctor of medicine, states that "...many believe that the practice of
somatic–cell nuclear transfer with the goal of generating an embryonic stem–cell line (sometimes
referred to as "therapeutic cloning") is justified, because it holds the promise of yielding new
ways of studying and treating a number of diseases"5. This particular finding tells us that there is
potentially, a lot of good from the cloning of humans and can be the cure for many serious
diseases. When researching the possible benefits of human cloning, I found very few tested
results and all are only theories, as we are yet to carry out proper testing due to ethical debates
and regulations brought upon scientists/engineers by those who are not in favour of the human
cloning controversy. The next evolutionary step in human cloning would be to test and improve
the practise as we are yet to find any real evidence of good that can come from human cloning.
Another view point/belief of Rudolf Jaenisch was that "In addition, because embryonic stem cells
can generate most, if not all, types of cells in vitro, a stem cell isolated from a patient with a
complex genetic disease could be used to study the pathogenesis of the disease in culture." This tells
us that with the research on cells of a person with a disease, could unlock multiple doors and be a
major breakthrough in health

Persuasive Essay On Cloning Humans
Most people have the intuitive sense that there is something immoral and wrong about the cloning of
humans. I believe that it is an inhumane violation of the natural order of nature to clone humans, and
our society will not benefit if research on this topic is continued. Scientists should be focusing their
research on more important issues, like curing cancer or mass purifying water in third world
countries. By cloning human beings, we would be viewing children, and people in general, as
objects that can be designed and manufactured to perform specific tasks, which would essentially
lead to creating slaves and/or weapons. I am going to prove to you that cloning humans would
violate the natural order of nature, and further research...show more content...
No argument could ever justify cloning humans and having them risk these health hazards.
People argue that reproductive cloning can provide genetically related children for people who
are infertile/ cannot have kids. This would give them a chance to have children of their own.
However, the number of people who cannot have kids is very small, and there are other ways of
having a child of your own without the dangers of human cloning. They can have surrogate
mothers produce a child for them, and even though it will not have their exact DNA, the child will
still be yours. If this small group of people had access to the information, it would be impossible to
keep it from spreading. There is pain for everyone involved, especially the subjects used for these
experiments.
Another reason why I feel cloning humans should be illegal is because it is very unsafe to attempt
cloning a human without risking physical safety of the clones and the women who bear them.
Trying to clone humans is not worth risking the safety of these women and the clones themselves.
The clone's surrogate mother faces potentially fatal risks from carrying clones that are usually
abnormally large at birth. More than 95 percent of cloning attempts fail, and the ones that do not fail,
as well as surrogate mothers who carry the clones, suffer painful diseases and deformities to produce
each 'successful' clone. In recent studies with animals, the surrogate mother is

Persuasive Essay On Human Cloning Debate

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from College Papers Writing Service

More from College Papers Writing Service (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Persuasive Essay On Human Cloning Debate