192020 Capella University Scoring Guide Toolhttpsscor.docx

1/9/2020 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 1/7
MHA-FP5064
u03a1 - Health Information System Implementation
Learner: Monna , Joseph
OVERALL COMMENTS
Mona
This paper is not very clear and specific. You have very
genialized explanations of data and are not discussing
data requirements from meaningful use and merit-based
incentives. Also you are not supporting the data needs
with CURRENT academic sources. You only have 2 references
both from well over 10 years ago. You need
research current trends and best practices from recent sources.
See the rubric below for more specifics.
RUBRICS

CRITERIA 1
Outline a plan for collecting and analyzing data.
COMPETENCY
Incorporate project management principles into health care
administration management and leadership.
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not outline a plan for collecting
and analyzing data.
BASIC:
Outlines a plan for collecting and analyzing data that is
impracticable or unlikely to yield limited data for
analysis.
PROFICIENT: Outlines a plan for collecting and analyzing
data.
DISTINGUISHED:
Outlines a plan for collecting and analyzing data. Provides a
concise and well-articulated outline that
identifies specific data needs and a clear approach to analysis.
Comments:
I am not see a plan that alignes with current trends in health
care. Plan needs to address specific data that
would common in an EHR and meet current legislative
requirments.

(20%)
CRITERIA 2
Propose criteria for evaluating organizational needs.
COMPETENCY
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not propose criteria for
evaluating organizational needs.
BASIC:
Proposes criteria for evaluating organizational needs that may
lead to erroneous conclusions.
PROFICIENT: Proposes criteria for evaluating organizational
needs.
DISTINGUISHED:
Proposes criteria for evaluating organizational needs, and
provides relevant, credible evidence that
clearly validates the proposed criteria.

Comments:
Very unclear and is not alinging with best practices from
AHIMA, HIMSS or Health IT,gov. Research
current oversight organizations
(16%)
CRITERIA 3
Outline a plan for generating reports.
COMPETENCY
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not outline a plan for generating
reports.
BASIC:
Outlines a plan for generating reports that is impracticable or
unlikely to provide all of the information
necessary to support sound decision making.
PROFICIENT: Outlines a plan for generating reports.

DISTINGUISHED:
Outlines a plan for generating reports. Provides a concise and
well-articulated outline that establishes
clear expectations for stakeholders regarding the information
they will receive.
Comments:
Also very unclear as to the specific data analysis needs -
address key stakeholders by describing the
stakeholders
(16%)
CRITERIA 4
Identify the personnel and logistics needed to carry out an
implementation plan.
COMPETENCY
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not identify the resources and logistics needed to carry out

an implementation plan.
BASIC: Overlooks key considerations or identifies resources
where the need is unclear.
PROFICIENT: Identifies the personnel and logistics needed to
carry out an implementation plan.
DISTINGUISHED:
Identifies the personnel and logistics needed to carry out an
implementation plan. Provides a
comprehensive, perceptive, and justifiable needs assessment
based on specific project requirements.
Comments:
This is not aligning with what is current today in health IT. You
should focus on meaningufl use guidelines
and merit-based incentives as guide as well as project
management best practices. Your analysis of
logistics was vague and unclear
(16%)
CRITERIA 5

Propose a project timeline.
COMPETENCY
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not propose a project timeline.
BASIC: Proposes a project timeline based on unrealistic time
estimates.
PROFICIENT: Proposes a project timeline.
DISTINGUISHED:
Proposes a project timeline that explicitly acknowledges
underlying assumptions and identifies the
factors that could significantly alter the proposed timeline.
Comments:
I am not seeing an actual project timeline. You only stated the
project will take place on July 2020. This is
not what we are looking for. We want to see timeframes such as
needs assessment completed by x
months/weeks, EHR selction completed by X months weeks etc.
Should have all the steps in the project
timed out.
(16%)

CRITERIA 6
Write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar, mechanics,
and APA formatting.
COMPETENCY
Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an
appropriate form and style, consistent with
applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar,
mechanics, and APA formatting.
BASIC:
Writing is unclear and disorganized, includes errors in grammar
and mechanics that inhibit effective
communication, or contains incorrect or improperly formatted
source citations and references.
PROFICIENT: Writes clearly and concisely, using correct
grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.
DISTINGUISHED:

Writes clearly and concisely. Grammar, mechanics, and APA
formatting are error-free.
Comments:
APA is not being followed
APA you must bold/center your headings, use hanging indent
for references. Fix grammar errors
(16%)
2
Running Head: Implementation Plan
2
Implementation Plan
Submitted By: Assignment
36th Jan, 2020
Introduction

The expectation is that the extremely generous monetary,
human, and hierarchical speculations being made in electronic
health records, electronic endorsing, entire framework
telehealth care, and related advances will streamline individual
and authoritative work forms and along these lines improve the
quality, security, and productivity of care. Actually, in any
case, that these innovations may demonstrate disappointing for
cutting edge clinicians and associations as the frameworks may
not accommodate their standard work processes, and the
foreseen individual and authoritative advantages set aside some
effort to appear.
Types of data to be analysed and how to implement it.
Different health related data are required to screen and better
comprehend the strength of the populace, including the
occurrence and predominance of malady, dreariness and
mortality related with intense and interminable disease, social
hazard elements, disability, and the personal satisfaction. Data
are likewise expected to plan, actualize, and assess health
arrangements, projects, and administrations. The data to address
these issues are delivered and utilized in both people in general
and private divisions and, progressively, by open private
organizations. The plan will be rolled out from the top
management all the way to patients receiving treatment in the
hospital. Memos with messages regarding the upgrade will be
put on all notice boards in the hospital hallways.
Criteria for evaluation of the organization
Evaluation is a significant device for improving administration.
Through hierarchical appraisal - usually known as Evaluation -
the adequacy of an association is estimated as far as its
working, issues and accomplishments from both the behavioural
and social framework perspectives. Hierarchical evaluation in
this way includes estimation of factors identified with examples
of authoritative conduct and viability. It can assume a
significant job in helping administrators improve the
productivity and viability of their tasks and can be an
instrument for making open help for the examination projects

and effort exercises.
Contingent on when Evaluation is directed, it might be ex bet,
current or ex post. Ex risk Evaluation is directed preceding
execution. It includes examination of inside and outer
consistency of plans, projects and tasks before their usage.
Current or progress Evaluation is led during usage. It gauges the
degree of utilization of assets and materials; the execution of
exercises and the fractional outcomes came to in connection to
the set plans. It is otherwise called checking or simultaneous
Evaluation, since it happens at numerous focuses during
execution. Ex post Evaluation is led after execution. It includes
Evaluation of the outcomes and effect in connection to the set
destinations
When planning a report, the following must be put into
consideration:
· Characterize the issue and the motivation behind the report
It is critical to examine the issue and characterize your
motivation. It is valuable at this phase to ask yourself inquiries,
for example, the accompanying:
What will the report examine?
What is the extent of your examination?
What are the restrictions of your examination?
What technique will you use to direct your examination?
What is the centrality of this examination?
Characterizing the motivation behind your report is generally
significant. When you have decided the motivation behind the
report, it will be simpler to characterize your crowd and the
data you have to gather.
· Characterize the crowd
· Decide the Ideas to Include
· Gather the Data
· Sort and Evaluate the Data
· Compose the Data
· Set up the Outline
The outlined criteria will be used when generating weekly
reports that will focus on the progress of the new upgrades. The

data will be sent directly to the top management of the
organization.
Numerous health data innovation acquirements depend on
expected advantages, which are regularly ineffectively
determined. This can bring about troubles conceding to a mutual
vision over the social insurance association. While terms like
'improved nature of care' and 'improved effectiveness' are
regularly utilized, nitty gritty results coming about because of
explicit usefulness are difficult to gauge and to envision as most
executions require crucial changes to operational procedures.
Consent from the top management
Proficient, administrative, and managerial agreement should be
worked around the key vision, notwithstanding making the way
to help the acknowledgment of this vision. This may include
thinking about whether to focus on radical changes over the
association (e.g., through executing electronic health record
usefulness), or whether to concentrate on streamlining explicit
procedures (e.g, electronic recommending) at first and afterward
extending usefulness over the long run.
Choices
When the requirement for a mechanical framework has been
built up, it is critical to submit sufficient time and assets to
completely consider various choices as far as which system(s)
to pick. We have discovered that this part of planning and the
related composition of business cases and acquisition
contemplations are some of the time under-assessed and
regularly hurried.
Reasonable systems to address clinical issues
When a choice on the essential kind of framework has been
made, it is critical to base the last decision on hierarchical, yet
additionally on clinical needs. A framework ought to be both fit
for authoritative reason and fit for clinical practice.
Planning and follow up
It takes both focused on and intelligent endeavours to get ready
for transformative hierarchical endeavours of any sort. In spite
of the fact that adaptability in procedure is required, there are

some broad pointers that will in general portray compelling
arrangement crosswise over associations and advancements.
These incorporate the previously mentioned need to connect
widely with potential providers and different associations who
have just actualized, yet in addition the choice to organize the
usage of usefulness that can carry advantages to the best
number of end-clients as ahead of schedule as could be expected
under the circumstances.
Building up the correct foundation is a basic piece of planning
action. On the off chance that this isn't managed adequate
consideration, at that point programming frameworks may
perform sub-ideally (e.g., if remote systems are inaccessible or
data transmission is excessively thin), or might be out of reach
to clients by and large. Once more, this builds the likelihood
that frameworks are not utilized at all or utilized in manners
other than proposed, conceivably bargaining advantages and
expanding dangers related with innovative frameworks
Training the staff to follow the plan
Prepared clients will in general be happier with new
advancements than the individuals who have not been enough
prepared. This might be because of an absence of
comprehension of framework abilities, which can thusly prompt
workarounds whereby the new frameworks are utilized in
unintended manners—or more terrible still—maintained a
strategic distance from totally.
The best preparing is what is customized to the individual jobs
of clients, without being excessively prohibitive as this can
undermine comprehension of how the entire framework
capacities. Preparing needs to enable clients to rehearse 'hands-
on' and as intently mimic the real workplace as could be
expected under the circumstances.
Assessment of the plan
In spite of the fact that it is currently broadly perceived that
Evaluation is significant when thinking about new advances,
actually it is still, as a rule, an untimely idea as quick execution
exercises take need. Constant, longitudinal data assortment

techniques giving developmental criticism are alluring as rising
outcomes can be joined in on-going usage action, yet this is
expensive and tedious.
Keep up the framework
Upkeep is from numerous points of view identified with the
entirety of the above focuses as these issues should be returned
to intermittently all through the innovation lifecycle. All things
considered, upkeep merits specific consideration as it is
regularly under-evaluated in connection to related exercises and
cost. This isn't just the situation in connection to on-going
expenses (e.g., relating to help, framework, and framework
updates), yet in addition costs identifying with potential
framework changes as the vital points of associations and thusly
the capacities of existing mechanical frameworks are probably
going to change after some time.
Careful planning and on-going, basic Evaluation of progress are
fundamental to the effective execution of significant health data
innovation. Taking a lifecycle point of view on the execution of
mechanical frameworks will, we trust, help associations to keep
away from a portion of the very regularly experienced
entanglements and improve the probability of fruitful usage and
reception. It is, nonetheless, imperative to remember that, in
spite of the fact that the stages and contemplations examined
here were portrayed in a straight way, they may somewhat
cover. This is predictable with the intricate idea of huge scale
health data innovation usage, where a scope of various between
related elements are having an effect on everything.
Implementation of the project will be undertaken on the 1st of
July 2020. This timeline will give everyone a chance to adjust
to the new strategies and working conditions.

References
Berg, M. (2001). Implementing information systems in health
care organizations: myths and challenges. International journal
of medical informatics, 64(2-3), 143-156.
Hash, J., Bowen, P., Johnson, A., Smith, C. D., & Steinberg, D.
I. (2005). An introductory resource guide for implementing the
health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA)
security rule. US Department of Commerce, Technology
Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

192020 Capella University Scoring Guide Toolhttpsscor.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to 192020 Capella University Scoring Guide Toolhttpsscor.docx

Similar to 192020 Capella University Scoring Guide Toolhttpsscor.docx (20)

More from aulasnilda

More from aulasnilda (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

192020 Capella University Scoring Guide Toolhttpsscor.docx