Required Resources The following resources are required to complete the assessment. · Vila Health: HIMS Cost Benefit Analysis | Transcript. . This multimedia simulation will enable you to practice analyzing the short- and long-term costs and the benefits of implementing Vila Health's existing health information system at one of the newly-acquired rural hospitals. SHOW LESS Suggested Resources The resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The MHA-FP5064 Health Care Information Systems Analysis and Design for Administrators Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you. Adoption of Health Information Systems The following articles examine issues surrounding the adoption of health information systems, which may be helpful when considering cost-benefit analyses. · Adler-Milstein, J., Everson, J., & Lee, S. D. (2015). EHR adoption and hospital performance: Time-related effects. Health Services Research, 50(6), 1751–1771. . This study looked for evidence of a relationship between the adoption of an EHR by hospital and hospital performance. · Ben-Assuli, O., Ziv, A., Sagi, D., Ironi, A., & Leshno, M. (2016). Cost-effectiveness evaluation of EHR: Simulation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm in the emergency department. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(6), 1–13. . This study examines whether health information technologies are cost-effective by current standards and whether they improve decision making and the quality of care. · Bergmo, T. S. (2015). How to measure costs and benefits of ehealth interventions: An overview of methods and frameworks. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(11), e254. . Examines how to best apply cost-benefit evaluation methods to health information technologies. · Price, M., & Lau, F. (2014). The clinical adoption meta-model: A temporal metamodel describing the clinical adoption of health information systems. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 14(1), 1–23. . Presents an accessible model to aid implementers, evaluators, and others in the planning and implementation of health information systems. Writing Resources You are encouraged to explore the following writing resources. You can use them to improve your writing skills and as source materials for seeking answers to specific questions. · APA Module. · Academic Honesty & APA Style and Formatting. · APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]. Library Resources · Journal and Book Locator. · Journal and Book Locator Library Guide. · Interlibrary Loan. 1/10/2020 Health Information System Cost-Benefit Analysis Scoring Guide https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/MHA-FP/MHA-FP5064/180700/Scoring_Guides/a04_scoring_guide.html 1/2 Health Information Sy ...

1. Required Resources
The following resources are required to complete the
assessment.
· Vila Health: HIMS Cost Benefit Analysis | Transcript.
. This multimedia simulation will enable you to practice
analyzing the short- and long-term costs and the benefits of
implementing Vila Health's existing health information system
at one of the newly-acquired rural hospitals.
SHOW LESS
Suggested Resources
The resources provided here are optional. You may use other
resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment;
however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate,
credible, and valid. The MHA-FP5064 Health Care Information
Systems Analysis and Design for Administrators Library
Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental
Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left
navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional
resources to help support you.
Adoption of Health Information Systems
The following articles examine issues surrounding the adoption
of health information systems, which may be helpful when
considering cost-benefit analyses.
· Adler-Milstein, J., Everson, J., & Lee, S. D. (2015). EHR
adoption and hospital performance: Time-related effects. Health
Services Research, 50(6), 1751–1771.
. This study looked for evidence of a relationship between the
adoption of an EHR by hospital and hospital performance.
· Ben-Assuli, O., Ziv, A., Sagi, D., Ironi, A., & Leshno, M.
(2016). Cost-effectiveness evaluation of EHR: Simulation of an
abdominal aortic aneurysm in the emergency
department. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(6), 1–13.
. This study examines whether health information technologies
are cost-effective by current standards and whether they

2. improve decision making and the quality of care.
· Bergmo, T. S. (2015). How to measure costs and benefits of
ehealth interventions: An overview of methods and
frameworks. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(11),
e254.
. Examines how to best apply cost-benefit evaluation methods to
health information technologies.
· Price, M., & Lau, F. (2014). The clinical adoption meta-
model: A temporal metamodel describing the clinical adoption
of health information systems. BMC Medical Informatics &
Decision Making, 14(1), 1–23.
. Presents an accessible model to aid implementers, evaluators,
and others in the planning and implementation of health
information systems.
Writing Resources
You are encouraged to explore the following writing resources.
You can use them to improve your writing skills and as source
materials for seeking answers to specific questions.
· APA Module.
· Academic Honesty & APA Style and Formatting.
· APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX].
Library Resources
· Journal and Book Locator.
· Journal and Book Locator Library Guide.
· Interlibrary Loan.
1/10/2020 Health Information System Cost-Benefit Analysis
Scoring Guide
https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/MHA-
FP/MHA-
FP5064/180700/Scoring_Guides/a04_scoring_guide.html 1/2

3. Health Information System Cost-Benefit Analysis Scoring
Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
Identify the
components of a
health information
system.
Does not identify
the components
of a health
information
system.
Overlooks
components of a
health information
system important to
an accurate cost-
benefit analysis.
Identifies the
components of a
health information
system.
Identifies the
components of a health
information system.
Provides a complete
and accurate inventory
of all key components.

4. Identify gaps
between current
health information
technology and
future needs.
Does not identify
gaps between
current health
information
technology and
future needs.
Identifies gaps
between current
health information
technology and
future needs that are
unclear or unlikely.
Identifies gaps
between current
health information
technology and
future needs.
Identifies gaps
between current health
information technology
and future needs.
Makes astute
inferences from a
rational assessment of
future needs.
Analyze the costs

5. of implementing
an upgraded
system.
Does not analyze
the costs of
implementing an
upgraded system.
Provides an
incomplete cost
analysis that
overlooks key
considerations.
Analyzes the
costs of
implementing an
upgraded system.
Analyzes the short-
and long-term costs of
implementing an
upgraded system.
Provides a detailed
and insightful analysis,
and articulates
uncertainties or
knowledge gaps that
could affect investment
decisions.
Analyze the
benefits of
implementing an
upgraded system.

6. Does not analyze
the benefits of
implementing an
upgraded system.
Provides an
incomplete benefit
analysis that
overlooks key
considerations.
Analyzes the
benefits of
implementing an
upgraded system.
Analyzes the short-
and long-term benefits
of implementing an
upgraded system.
Provides a detailed
and insightful analysis,
and articulates
uncertainties or
knowledge gaps that
could affect investment
decisions.
Analyze the costs
and benefits of
not implementing
an upgraded
system.
Does not analyze

7. the costs and
benefits of not
implementing an
upgraded system.
Analyzes some of
the costs and
benefits of not
implementing an
upgraded system,
but omits significant
items that should
have been
understood through
study activities.
Analyzes the
costs and
benefits of not
implementing an
upgraded system.
Analyzes the costs and
benefits of not
implementing an
upgraded system. Also
identifies knowledge
gaps, unknowns,
missing information,
unanswered questions,
or areas of uncertainty,
where further
information could
improve the analysis.

8. 1/10/2020 Health Information System Cost-Benefit Analysis
Scoring Guide
https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/MHA-
FP/MHA-
FP5064/180700/Scoring_Guides/a04_scoring_guide.html 2/2
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
Determine the
impact of evolving
business trends
on system
upgrade
decisions.
Does not
describe evolving
business trends.
Describes evolving
business trends.
Determines the
impact of
evolving business
trends on system
upgrade
decisions.
Determines the impact
of evolving business
trends on system
upgrade decisions.

9. Explicitly identifies
logical implications and
consequence based on
an insightful
interpretation and
synthesis of business
trends; draws well-
reasoned, logical
conclusions supported
by relevant and
credible evidence.
Make
implementation
recommendations
based on a cost-
benefit analysis.
Does not make
implementation
recommendations
based on a cost-
benefit analysis.
Makes
implementation
recommendations,
but the links to the
cost-benefit analysis
are unclear,
questionable, or not
well-documented.
Makes
implementation
recommendations

10. based on a cost-
benefit analysis.
Makes implementation
recommendations
based on a cost-benefit
analysis. Draws
rational, fully-justified
conclusions from an
insightful assessment
of long-and short-term
project costs, benefits,
and risks.
Write clearly and
concisely, using
correct grammar,
mechanics, and
APA formatting.
Does not write
clearly and
concisely, using
correct grammar,
mechanics, and
APA formatting.
Writing is unclear
and disorganized,
includes errors in
grammar and
mechanics that
inhibit effective
communication, or
contains incorrect or
improperly formatted

11. source citations and
references.
Writes clearly and
concisely, using
correct grammar,
mechanics, and
APA formatting.
Writes clearly and
concisely. Grammar,
mechanics, and APA
formatting are error-
free.
Running head: ABBREVIATED TITLE OF YOUR PAPER 1
ABBREVIATED TITLE OF YOUR PAPER 4Full Title of
Your PaperLearner’s Full Name (no credentials)Capella
UniversityCourse TitleAssignment TitleMonth, YearAbstract
[Add text here. Delete this page if not required.]
Keywords: [Add keywords here.]Title of Paper
[Add text here, using heading levels as appropriate.]References
[List references here.]
Cost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Benefit Analysis WorksheetThis cell
left blank intentionally.Enter Year
Natasha Smith: You can edit this column header to be the actual
year.CY +1CY +2CY +3CY +4CY +5Cost Benefit
AnalysisCosts
Natasha Smith: Enter cost amounts as future value (FV)
expectations. The FV will be automatically converted to present
value (PV).Total PV benefits$0.00Total PV costs$0.00Net
Benefit$0.00Total costs (future value)Total costs (present

12. value)Benefits
Natasha Smith: Enter benefit amounts as FV expectations. The
FV will automatically be converted to PV.Total benefits (future
value)Total benefits (present value)End of Worksheet