School Systems And The Feudal Society Of The Middle Ages

School Systems And The Feudal Society Of The Middle Ages
Contrary to popular belief, school systems and the feudal society of the Middle Ages have a lot in common. Although many people believe that
feudalism is extinct in today's society, it can be exemplified in small school districts. School systems relate to feudalism through correlations in
personnel titles, structure of grounds, and enemies.
One major factor in feudalism is one's personal ranking over another. One's title shows what privileges and advantages he or she has over another. For
instance, in the Middle Ages, the Pope reigns over all social classes in Western Europe. Just as the Pope has supreme authority in the feudal society, the
school board exercises its total authority over students and all faculty. Even though everyone naturally
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Tech Environment
Technological Environment
Gregory Hamlin
BUSN 310. Business Theory
Professor Rachel Nagel
American Military University
March 31st, 2012
TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT The company I am continuing to work with is US Airways Group. There is plenty of hard and soft technology
to list for the domestic environment. Some of the hard technology used in the domestic environment is aircraft, security system, and safety gear. Some
soft technology used in the domestic environment is management, government regulations that govern the procedures of the company, and training for
employees. The hard technology I listed above is the obvious technology the air line company utilizes yet there is more hard technology being used.
The soft ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I honest believe this is the only remedy for providing up to date technology, the company has to make it a priority to provide the same technology
to the global environment. The customs can be corrected by provided a print out of what is allowed and what is not allowed to be brought into or
out of a country a passenger is traveling through. The information is available online but some older passengers aren't as savvy with technology so
they may not receive the same information. With this tactic there is not any excuse for not knowing what is expected when going through customs.
The strategies I stated above will be successful, only if they are applied. Without application the strategy will be a failure. Within the domestic
environment the security system can be significantly improved and decrease the risk for terrorist attacks greatly. This technology needs to be
protected by requiring a security clearance for all employees who work for the company. This way you have a thorough back ground check on
everyone who works for US Airways Group and the risk for inside information getting out to enemies of the United States is low. Within the global
environment technology needs to be advanced. The company can protect this technology by only providing the technology to its global counterparts
and not the

Use Of Technology And Social Media
The use of technology and social media makes our life a lot easier. Social media and technology play a huge role in our everyday life and friendship.
In today's world, people, mostly teenagers use social media and technology every day to communicate and interact with others. Technology gives us
an opportunity to connect with anybody we want from anywhere we are, saving us time. According to "Daily News" 84 percent of people worldwide
say they couldn't go a single day without their mobile device in their hand. That means almost everybody uses their phone in order to communicate
and stay updated. I use my phone every single day and I cannot imagine living my life without a smartphone. I go on social media websites every day
to connect with friends and see what they are doing. It is the fastest way to interact with friends and I love technology for that. A couple decades ago
people didn't have good communication devices therefore it was much harder for them to connect with each other. Technology makes it much more
convenient and easy for us to use, saving us a lot of time. Having technology makes our life easier and at the same time virtual. It is very convenient
and just normal for our society to use it everyday. In my opinion modern technology provides more options and opportunities to connect with our
friends. I really don't think that technology and social media ruin our friendships like most people would say. It all depends on how you use it.
Technology and Social media

What Is Effective Altruism As A Philosophy And Social...
Peter Singer, author of The Most Good You Can Do, defines effective altruism as "a philosophy and social movement which applies evidence and
reason to working out the most effective ways to improve the world" (Singer, 2015, p. 4–5). Given this definition, who are effective altruists? They are
individuals who wish to make positive contributions to society by considering their course of action in an objective manner. To make this clearer,
Singer contrasts effective altruists from "warm glow givers" (Singer, 2015, p. 5). Warm glow givers donate to charities to feel good without truly
understanding how their donations are utilized to help people. Hence, these givers will offer their donations not to the most pressing causes, but to
causes that appeal to their heart. On the other hand, effective altruists do not immediately act based on their emotions. Instead, they take a moment
to step back and critically analyze if a certain action will help as much people as they hope it will. In short, they want to target the most urgent issues
by maximizing whatever resources they have for the benefit of a larger group of people. Since effective altruism is a movement aimed at helping the
most people, who are these people that altruists hope to help? It is clear to me from this chapter that so far, the goal of effective altruism is to uplift
the poor. In this chapter, Singer states that money will be utilized best if it is directed towards uplifting the needy in developing countries.

A Scientifically Literate Population Is The Essential...
Earlier this year, the Washington State Department of Health reported the first confirmed measles–related death in the United States since 2003.
Although the woman herself had been vaccinated for measles, she was infected by another patient with measles while she was taking immune system
suppressants. This event is a symbol of the foreboding issue currently facing our society––that of scientific illiteracy. We live in a highly interconnected
society, and each person is not only responsible for himself, he is also responsible for the lives of everyone else in his community. In our dynamic
world where new ideas are constantly being tested, new technologies are constantly being invented, and new developments are constantly being
discovered, we as a society must also adapt our level of scientific understanding, so that we are able to make informed decisions about our lives. A
scientifically literate population is the essential cornerstone of an innovative culture. To be scientifically literate means to be able to ask questions,
collect information, and apply what we learned to solve problems and communicate results to the public. And as a consumer, as a professional, and
as a citizen of this democracy, we must be empowered to form educated opinions so that we are less likely to make mistaken decisions, or misled by
others. Yet various polls and surveys have shown that scientific literacy in the United States is staggeringly low. Why is this? Part of the problem
arises from the

A Short History of Progress
The term, progress, is synonymous with phrases that denote moving forward, growth, and advancement. It seems unorthodox then that Ronald Wright
asserts the world has fallen into a progress trap, a paradox to how progress is typically portrayed as it contradicts the conventional way life is viewed:
as being a natural progression from the outdated and tried towards the new and improved. Wright posits that it is the world's relentless creation of
innovative methods that ironically contributes to the progress trap rather than to progress itself, the intended objective. Wright's coinage of the term
"progress trap" refers to the phenomenon of innovations that create new complications that are typically left without resolve which exacerbate... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The humans living in that period were unable to supplement their previous diet, which was rich in protein, and their culture was devastated as a result;
this then, is an example of progress (better hunting methods) that led to the failure of an entire culture as its problems were left unsolved. In his third
chapter, Wright examines two particular civilizations that thrived but eventually declined due to resource depletion. What is interesting is the
similarities that can be drawn from the examples of Easter Island and Sumer, like the widespread ignorance of the masses to actively prevent the
abrasion of their land, the perpetual idleness of people to not do anything even when there was enough time to stop the tragic collapse, to current–day
situations of people who even flat–out deny climate change and claim it to be part of the left–wing agenda. On Easter Island, it was over–logging that
led to their collapse, since as their ecosystem withered away, logging became scarce, and wars broke out for those sparse resources. In Sumer similar
environmental destruction occurred (i.e. overgrazing, land clearing), which should alarm the world population of today of what may become of the
high levels

Peasants Role In Feudal Society
The most populated group in feudal society were the peasants. They were not part of the feudal relationship between lord and vassal. However,
when the peasants did their jobs, which was working the land, they supported the kings, nobles, and knights. The work accomplished by these
peasants was insanely valuable as they allowed the lords and knights to spend time preparing for battles and wars. The peasants found new ways to
farm that greatly improved the amount of food produced. Instead of growing food by rotating crops on two fields, the peasants rotated crops on three
fields. As a result of their new findings, more crops could be grown resulting in a greater food production allowing the population to expand. In
addition to the peasants' roles in European feudal society, the climate of Europe forced the peasants to work year round. In August and September, they
harvested grain. And in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The first type was the free peasants who rented land to farm and owed only their rent to the lord. They had the ability to own small businesses and
small parts of land which greatly differed them from the serfs. The serfs were another type of peasant in feudal society. They were unfree peasants
who farmed the lord's fields and could not leave their lord's manor. Serfs received their own small plot of land to farm in return for their labor.
They were similar to slaves but could not be bought or sold and could not leave their lands without permission. Possible jobs that a serf could have
on a manor were carpenters, farmers, or tax collectors. Serfs had the ability to buy back their freedom with money which was very rare because they
were extremely poor causing their chances to be very rare. In conclusion, the peasants being the largest class in the feudal structure, helped protect and
sustain their kingdoms by playing pivotal roles which were mainly working the fields and making food for

Marcuses Account of the Features and Significance of True...
Modern capitalist society is the target of severe criticism in Herbert Marcuse's book, One–Dimensional Man. As one would hope, Marcuse's intent is
not merely to point out the shortcomings of the present system. He further hopes to encourage change in the most basic features of society, and with
the intent to effect change arises the question of what goals the proposed change is directed towards. Primary among his goals is the
"development and satisfaction of human needs and faculties" (xliii). Which of the wide range of human faculties are worthy of
development? This question obviously requires value judgments to be made; any answer will be highly subjective or very complex, and probably both
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because they are imposed on human mentality rather then inherent in the human condition, the needs which arise within an individual in this way are
not truly necessary. Marcuse's term for these unnecessary needs is "false needs." It seems a feature of his definition that "false
needs" are distinguished by their being imposed on the individual by social interests beyond her own control. To this definition Marcuse adds the
contention that such needs are invariably harmful, a point which requires empirical support. He writes that these conditioned needs are "the
needs which perpetuate toil, aggressiveness, misery, and injustice" (5). How does this happen?
One can view Marcuse's account of the harm arising from the creation of false needs as a direct reponse to an anticipated objection by an adherent of
liberal political theory. The liberal theorist might argue that providing certain basic freedoms, perhaps a right to self–determination, must be the
primary goal of society. This goal must take precedence over other aspects ofhuman life, and the liberal theorist might even argue that bodily
sustenance is worthless without basic freedoms. Marcuse's argument in opposition to this possible view is the idea that "freedom from
want" is "the concrete substance of all freedom" (1). This

The Battle Of The Final War
Polis. The name probably didn't have quite the impact as its parent word "metropolis", but the parent word was cumbersome and, as people are wont to
do, prone to shortening. The parent word may have better–conveyed the city's size and scope and industry...or maybe not. Perhaps that was why the
word was changed over time: as the city grew and grew, the word "metropolis" seemed to become more and more inadequate. And "Mega City One"
was just lame. In the aftermath of the Final War (as people called it, when referring to the conflict that gave rise to Polis), things changed. Gradually,
at first, as those leaders that were perceived to have failed were replaced – sometimes violently – by people who genuinely seemed to care about the
population's needs and concerns. The country was slowly transformed, town by ruined town, city by devastated city, state by crippled state. Those
who'd survived were often eager for a leadership that would give them the direction they wanted, that put the people first, that put the needs of
society ahead of the needs of self. It was not socialism, as that was one of the driving forces that had led to the Final War in the first place; nor was it
capitalism, as that had been another driving force of the War– instead, a curious blend of social–conservatism rose to fill the void, and it was embraced
by the survivors. As months became years, and years became decades, things gradually changed. Those who'd begun the revival were elevated to
positions of

The Economic Structure Of Feudal Society
Emerging, as Marx posits, "out of the economic structure of feudal society," Capitalism quickly became a pervasive, relentless and seemingly
inescapable structure. "The emancipation from serfdom and from the fetters of the guild" led, on one hand, to the unprecedented creation of various
economic and social opportunities. Conversely, Marx also acknowledges that "these new freedmen became sellers of themselves only after they had
been robbed of all their own means of production, and of all the guarantees of existence afforded by the old feudal system...Just as man is governed, in
religion, by the products of his own brain, so, in capitalist production, he is governed by the products of his own hand...within the capitalist system all
methods for raising the social productiveness of labor are brought about at the cost of the individual laborer; all means for the development of
production transform themselves into means of domination over, and exploitation of, the producers; they mutilate the laborer into a fragment of a man,
degrade him to the level of an appendage of a machine...they transform his lifetime into working–time, and drag his wife and child beneath the wheels
of the Juggernaut of capital... Accumulation of wealth is at one pole, therefore, at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil slaver,
ignorance, brutality, mental degradation, at the opposite pole, i.e., one the side of the class that produces its own product in the form of capital."
Throughout the first

How Did The Vikings Influence Western Civilization
For centuries, religion has formed the backbone of society, perhaps even prior to the coining of the term. In many ways, religion influences the actions
of its participants, however, it also forms their outlook on life and their worldview. Out of its several influences, the change principally affects their
moral sense. Nonetheless, while religion influences its pious members, these individuals simultaneously go on to impact their neighbors. From the
Christians' zeal which initiated the Crusades, to the Buddhists' radical introduction to peaceful protest, all have left their mark on history. Dating back
to the Early Middle Ages, a certain "barbarian" group, the Vikings, arrived and left their imprint on history. Moreover, their constant mingling with
others of different cultures led them to make a difference to their neighbors. Eventually, the Vikings contributed to the constant adjustments made to
Western Civilization, and many stemmed from religion, the basis of all their actions.
Similar to the Roman Mythology, the Vikings exercised their own, unique mythology.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this age, they had no form of security, with the exception of their own strengths; rendering their situation remarkably vulnerable. Consequently, they
adopted a system to combat this threat which would provide security after the fall of the Roman government.6 Many years after the system had
crumbled, historians labeled this system as the "feudal system" or simply, "feudalism."7 However, feudalism had deeply integrated itself into the
Medieval European's life and, naturally, they had not given it a name nor recognized its presence.8 This system had many working parts to it, yet three
groups, the lords, the vassals, and the serfs, focused on the military and sustaining aspects.9 These two traits formed the foundation of the system
through their ability to provide for the European

Ulrich Beck World Risk Society
Ulrich beck :world risk society
What is "risk society" and how did it emerge?
"Risk society" means that we live in a world out of control. There is nothing certain but uncertainty. But let's go into details. The term "risk" has two
radically different meanings. It applies in the first place to a world governed entirely by the laws of probability, in which everything is measurable
and calculable. But the word is also commonly used to refer to non–quantitative uncertainties, to "risks that cannot be known." When I speak about "risk
society," it is in this latter sense of manufactured uncertainties. These "true" uncertainties, enforced by rapid technological innovations and accelerated
societal responses, are creating a fundamentally new ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The other side of the admitted presence of danger is the failure of the institutions that derive their authority from their purported mastery of such
danger. In this way, the "social birth" of a global danger is as much unlikely as it is a dramatic, indeed traumatic, world–shattering one. In the
experience of shock radiated by the mass media, it becomes recognizable; to quote Goya: the slumber of reason creates monsters.
Fear of various dangers, hazards, and the unknown have constituted the most basic of human experiences, drives, emotions, etc. In your book Risk
Society, you argue that "the driving force in the class society can be summarized in the phrase: I am hungry! The movement set in motion by the
risk society, on the other hand, is expressed in the statement: I am afraid! The commonality of anxiety takes the place of the commonality of need."
Could you say more about fear as a driving force in risk society? How does fear in a risk society differ from its formulations in other kinds of
societies––for example, feudal–agrarian societies? Do you agree with Anthony Giddens statement that "Our age is not more dangerous––not more
risky––than those of earlier generations, but the balance of risks and dangers has shifted." (1)
We don't know if we live in a world any more risky than those of earlier generations. It is not the quantity of risk, but the quality of control or––to be
more precise––the known

Feudal Society In Medieval Europe
A feudal society is one in which the lords carry a significant measure of power by owning land. Workers known as Serfs are included on the land.
Serfs owe the lord a certain amount of labor as well as give the lord a portion of their goods. The lords then gives protection to the serfs from their
knights. To get knights, the lord offers a fief(land) to the knight in exchange for military service. A feudal society had the characteristic of being
decentralized. It also had major roles and responsibilities that everyone needed to follow in order to keep the society intact. During the early Middle
Ages, decentralized governments, attacks from the Vikings and other barbarians, and the strong power of the Church strongly abetted the formation of
the feudal society in Medieval Europe. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When a government system is decentralized, then it may lack a strong military and infrastructure. After the fall of Charlemagne's empire, his society
required a lot of strong lords with powerful armies to protect the people because there was no strong centralized government. This led to feudalism
because the people were in need of protection and had no strong centralized government to make a strong army. The feudal society consisted of a
decentralized government and had a strong army.
Another factor that led to the development of feudal societies, were the attacks from the Vikings and other barbarians. Because The Vikings were so
fierce and quick when they attacked, it made them almost indefensible and very difficult to fight. When Charlemagne's empire fell, it suffered many
attacks from The Vikings that gradually weakened their government. Feudalism allowed for protection of everyone and people did not need to rely on
a strong, centralized

What Impact Did Religion And The Church Have On The...
What impact did religion and the church have on the development of feudal society?
Feudalism, during medieval society, was parallel to the existence of the Catholic Church and its influence over the population. Religion permeated all
elements of society and the way in which they related to each other. The Church wasn't only a spiritual power, but a political and economic one and
the struggles between the political and religious leaders will be key factors in the development of the medieval world. The church will also be the
primary keeper of knowledge in the Middle Ages, and they will accomplish most cultural advancements.
At the beginning of the 11th century, the predominant faith in Western Europe is the Catholic one, and the Church in those territories follows, in
theory, the same Canon Law and has the Pope at its head as the deciding voice in religious disputes. The Church was the main unifying factor between
territories that had evolved in very different ways, had different power structures in place and spoke different languages.
The Church owned significant amounts of land since it became the official religion of the Roman Empire, mainly in the form of bishoprics and
monasteries, but even at a smaller level in the shape of the lots assigned to the different parishes. The control of this resources had capital importance
for the different rulers who fought for the Control of the rights to appoint clergy at all levels, but mainly abbots and bishops, excluding the Pope

Major Feudal Societies In Japan Culture
Major feudal societies in Japan, Europe, and Africa share many aspects such as rulers, religion, and social structure. For example, all three societies
had a figure or king of which ruled their society, a place and way of worshipping a higher being through a religion, and a hierarchy, or social
structure. First, all feudal societies had a ruler, lord, or king in charge of the land. For instance, in Africa, the king was ghana, meaning war chief. The
ghana was ruler of all activities, served as commander in chief of an organized army, and was the head administrator of justice. The king was always in
charge and ordered ministers, mayors, civil servants, and counselors to accommodate with administrative duties the ghana had. Next in Japan, they...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Africa, Sundiata, or the "Lion King" created a system for the people, much like the caste system. To clarify, if you were born into a family of
warriors, then you have to become a warrior yourself. Also, if you were born into a family of djeli, meaning storytellers, then you had to become
part of the djeli religion. In this system, the ghana was on top and ruled over everything, ministers, mayors, civil servants, and counselors were in
the middle, and slaves were on bottom. Next in Japan, Tokugawa Ieyasu, a unifier of Japan created a feudal system called the Tokugawa system.
This system, much like the social structure in Africa, the emperors, or, leaders, were on the top, next were the farmers, then the artisans, followed
by the merchants, and slaves were on the bottom. At last, in Europe, much like Japan, they also had a feudal system. At the top was the Monarch,
which was the most powerful Lord and was in control of everything, even owning Vassals. Then came the Lords, who were in charge of protecting
their Vassal, and also gave Vassals plantations including peasants of which were working on the land. Next, Lesser Lords, also known as Vassals were
people that served to their greater lord and provided their lord with money, 40 days of military service every year, and advice. After, were the knights.
Boys at the age of 7 were forced to train to

Essay on The Civilizing Process by Norbert Elias
DP Summary: The Civilizing Process by Norbert Elias Social scientist, Norbert Elias, examines in part two of his book, The Civilizing Process, the
development of manners and the subsequent В‘civilizing' of Western Europe since the middle ages. This journey in time is an attempt to understand
what actually happened to humanity during several transitional periods. Elias perceives the development of western civilization in three historical
stages. (From the middle ages with a progression to the renaissance (extended to 1750) and finally to modern day society) Each society of the three
stages had it's own standards of behavior, which influenced the individual to act in a certain "accepted" way. A correlation was also found between the
...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This treatise was a "symptom of change, an embodiment of social processes," which left enormous amounts of information on socially acceptable
behavior of that time to be studied (Elias 48). The book, never equaled by another in precision, clarity, or frankness was used as a valuable resource
to Elias. Meant as instruction, Erasmus, (a guiding light of society at that time) coaches his audience (mainly the upper class) on dress, table manners,
spitting, vomiting, bed room behavior, clothing and a host of many different things involved ones' appearance in society. Certain modes of behavior
would be consider barbaric to modern times, while other aspects in the treaties, due in fact draw a parallel to current social norms. During the Middle
Ages the table setting consisted of drinking vessels, salt–cellar, and a "well–cleaned knife" on the right, with bread on the left (spoons used commonly,
folks rare in standard home of the time). Meat would be brought in, cut and taken in hand or on bread for consumption. Plates were uncommon. The
social elite, the kings and Queens alike all followed suit and ate with their hands. There was a catch, however. For the elite to be the "elite", they
needed some form of mannerism to distinguish them from the commoners (marks of distinction between classes). The elite usually possessed gold
utensils and had table decorations to make clear their social status and level of wealth. "It is most refined to use only three fingers"

How Did Christopher Columbus Contribute To Western...
Major Contributors to Western Civilization Western civilization did not start yesterday, however, started way back in the time of Noah and Moses who
are well–known figures in the history of the Hebrews. Even so, while there are many contributors to western civilization, the contributions happened in
different eras and in different magnitudes. The following is a discussion of the contributions made by different personalities in different eras. The
contributors are ranked from 1 to 5 with '1' being the most significant and '5' being the least significant.
1 – Galileo Galilee: 1564 – 1642
There is a common belief that most of the people who made substantial contributions to western civilization were all politicians or conquerors of some
sort. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Petersen–Boring mentions that Columbus discovery of Atlantic trade winds transformed how Americans conducted business (Petersen–Boring, 2010).
As a matter of fact, Columbus was on the first ship that traveled across the Atlantic Ocean with the help of Atlantic winds. This discovery came as a
blessing to most sea captains who were having a hard time steering ships that were transporting commercial goods across the Atlantic. Prior to
Columbus discovery, the different continents were independent of each other. Hence, trade activities were taking place within these continents. Even
so, with Columbus discovery, new avenues of trade were opened. As such, it was possible for the Americas to engageEurope and Asia in trade
activities. Petersen–Boring notes that the discovery of the Atlantic trade winds also led to the transportation of different cultures from one continent to
the other. However, the discovery also had some downsides that are worth mentioning. In particular, it led to the increase in slave trade. Western
countries would easily access Africa and take trades with them. what is more, the Atlantic winds would be used to steer ships into wars and to defeat
foreign nations in

Society During The Feudal Age
During the Feudal Age, societies began to change from having a rich class and everyone else was below them to having a hierarchy of classes. The
kings and emperors had the most power and the peasants had the least amount of power with other classes between kings and peasants. One of these
groups in between were the knights. Knights of this era were horsemen and rode horseback during war. This particular warfare was very difficult and
took multitudes of practice. The knights' equipment helped them stay on top of the horse because of the high saddle. The high saddle however still
allowed the knights to stand up during combat. Another piece of equipment was a conical helmet and a lance, which was their choice of weapon (p.
192). The

Semiotic Analysis of True Detective
Semiotic Analysis of True Detective In 1951, the first television crime drama series, Dragnet significantly influenced our American culture. According
to the New Oxford American Dictionary, the term "dragnet" is a symbol, for, a system of coordinated measures used to apprehend criminals or
suspects. Most crime drama series solve a different case each episode. Although, in current pop–culture crime dramas focus on one particular crime,
throughout an entire season. Similar, to the show "Homeland," the HBO crime drama TrueDetective adds a twist on the conventional series. The show
depicts a subject matter that has affected modern society as a whole. Southern Louisiana police detectives Rust Cohle and Marty Hart, in 2012, are
asked to revisit their solving of a ritualistic murder case from 1995. The murder of a former student of the Light of the Way Christian Academy lays the
foundation, for detective Cohle's doubts about the true design of religion. The True Detective storyline portrays the utilization of religion, education,
and politics, by men in power who manipulate and control young innocent children. Questioning the validity of religion within a crime drama series is
relative to modern society. The conspiracy within the Catholic Church to suppress hundreds of child molestations committed, by Catholic priests is a
pertinent sign represented in True Detective . Southern Louisiana is located in the heart of the American Bible belt, where religion is not a choice, but a

The Hundred Years ' War And Feudal Society
The Hundred Years' War and Feudal Society Why did the feudal order of Medieval society fall apart? The feudal order of the Middle Ages was a
system of local rule, where powerful lords gave land and protection in exchange for loyalty and military service from lesser lords. Tradition dictated
that this exchange would be held in place by the feudal contract, consisting of multiple pledges. This resulted in small communities consisting of one
powerful lord, peasants, and serfs who worked for the lord. These people gave their loyalty locally, and had no sense of nationalism at all. This type of
society was predominant in the Early Middle Ages, but soon started to fall apart during the Late Middle Ages. One major event that contributed to the
fall of the feudal society was the Hundred Years' War. This war was fought between England and France, lasting for a total of 116 years. During the
war, peasant uprisings became frequent, as the inordinate cost of military campaigns resulted in heavier taxes. Events such as these were caused by the
Hundred Years' War and further contributed to the decline of feudalistic society. The Hundred Years' War was a turning point in Medieval feudal
society, by marking the transition from feudal armies to the masses of mercenary soldiers, changing the balance of power within Medieval social
hierarchies, and strengthening nationalism while creating a more modern militaristic society. The greatest cause of the fall offeudalism in the late
Middle Ages

The Changes In Religion In The Communist Manifesto By Karl...
For Karl Marx, the changes in religion ultimately reflect the changes happening in society, because the religious world is just a reflection of the real
world. If this is the case here, the use of technology in a religious setting would make sense, as our technological world is ever expanding and will
further benefit the people at the top of religious hierarchies. In terms of online for–profit churches, Marx might argue that the market is driving the
religious realm to cater to technological advances. Marx states in The Communist Manifesto, "The feudal system of industry...now no longer sufficed
for the growing wants of the new markets", meaning that longstanding religious traditions, such as confession and synagogue teachings before Bar/Bat
Therefore, Durkheim would also argue that religion is mirrored after society, meaning that as society evolves – specifically in the technological realm –
religious practices will follow suit. This will occur because "religious representations are collective representations which express collective realities",
meaning Durkheim would probably think that online churches are meant to appeal to modern ideals (McIntosh, 1997). As Durkheim states in Religion
and Society, "the rites are a manner of acting, which take rise in the midst of the assembled groups which are destined to excite, maintain or recreate
certain mental states...", he further establishes that religious groups will do what is necessary to conform to what is happening in society in order to
stay relevant (McIntosh, 1997). Durkheim would probably argue in favor of these online for–profit church practices because it brings a sense of unity
to modern society, and acts as a way to revitalize the conscience collective, and churches provide "a society whose members are united by the fact that
they think in the same way in regard to the sacred world (McIntosh, 1997). Online churches might provide a new ritual that serves to remind us of our
social solidarity. In opposition, Durkheim might argue that online for–profit churches bring with them a lack of anomie. As stated by

Feudal Society Structure
6. Q: What were the basic underlining structures what are found in each feudal society and what purpose did these structures serve?
A: The fiefs under feudalism all contained basic structures that were essential in maintaining a fully sustainable community. Some basic structures
include water mills, houses, barns, and workshops, all self explanatory. The three most important structures were the church, the manor, and a three
field crop rotation complex. The manor was considered the brain of the fief, which provided shelter to the vassals and his staff, as well as a place for
royal celebrations such as feasts. The church as a part of daily life for everyone working of the fief, including the vassal, and was seen as the most
important structure ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was called "Feudal Justice", and gave nobles the ability to create court cases to settle disputes between the defendants and the accused. These
courts usually ended with the accused having to pay a fine, which brought considerable income to the nobles throne, however, ordeal by God and trial
by combat were considered equally as effective in proving innocence. This system of justice brought the same political power of the feudal system
itself, knights could not accuse the king, but peasants could call other peasants to be accused. Under this system, the daily lives of peasants could be
brought into question, however, both the accused and the accuser would receive the same treatment, and if the accused was not found guilty, the
accuser would receive the punishment. This created a system that discouraged the use of judicial courts for personal gain, and disallowed the ability to
move higher in terms of social status("Feudal

The Annihilation Of Space By Law
Q4. Don Mitchell, in his article 'The Annihilation of Space by Law,' argues that ordinances passed against the poor in the 1990s point to a highly
exclusionary type of modern citizenship. What does he mean by this? In what ways are the poor excluded from modern citizenship? How is this
exclusion justified socio–politically?
Space is never innocent. Regardless of whether a specific area is deemed public or private, space is never innocent because of the bodies who govern
those areas. Today, there are approximately 3.2 million Canadians who are either homeless or "transitionally" homeless, but regardless of their
citizenship, they are not considered as "modern citizens" by the society. Mitchell puts forth the argument that the ordinances passed in the 1990s has
stripped vagrants of their rights as actual Canadian citizens and has created an elite class of citizenship that only the privilege can enjoy.
According to the Canadian government, an individual is deemed as a citizen of Canada if they fulfill certain requirements such as being born in the
country, applying for a citizenship, or being born to at least one Canadian parent. With this citizenship, these individuals can now experience a wide
variety of privileges such as having the ability to vote, to either enter or leave the country, and to enjoy all the rights and freedoms that are associated
with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Some of these rights include the right to public assembly and

Causes And Differences Of Medieval Society In Modern Society
Modern society is inarguably different from medieval communities, quite frankly it would be terrifying if they were exactly the same. Contemporary
culture, in general, is not wholeheartedly focused on the journey to salvation/ religious causes as was more common in medieval communities.
Communication, technology and education have broadened the scope of human activity and opportunities. As far as declining religion and social
hierarchy, it remains debatable whether it is a cause or effect of modern technology. Though because humans are creatures of habit and conservative as
far as change, religious tradition and teachings remain embedded in many communities. Despite similarities based on tradition and inherited values,
modern society differs in driving forces and religious prevalence due to a developed and educated environment.
One of the most obvious differences between the two time periods is the presence of a social hierarchy. Though it would be naive to say that modern
society flourishes with equality and opportunity for all, equality is at least somewhat attempted by many societies. Medieval communities justified
opportunity difference with what they called the feudal system. This dictated education and position in regard to other people. Most medieval people
believed that God dictated a person position in society and that is where they were meant to stay, as opposed to the modern idea of moving up based
on merit (or connections). As far as modern people, there is

Why Are Cities An Essential Part Of Civilization Questions...
QUESTION 2.
Why are cities an essential part of civilization? Has urban life been the same in different civilizations over time? Why or why not? What accounts for
the similarities and differences in various places and eras? To write a successful essay on these questions, you need to integrate material from each of
the following chapters in our textbook: Chapters 3, 6, and 11.
WHY CITIES ARE AN ESSENTIAL PART OFCIVILIZATION.
Civilization refers to a complex human society with its own social organization and culture; where the entire society is educated and their way of life
improved. It is characterized by people practicing agriculture and settling in cities. Before a human community grows to this level of sophistication and
a highly organized social order, various entities ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Over–exploitation of the environment. vii. Cultural Diffusion – Due to trading activities, Cultures, religions, and diseases spread easily particularly in
areas around the trade routes
Civilizations were highly dependent on the environment. The following act as the main factors that have contributed to contrasts in different eras and
locations during civilization:
Rate of urban development.
In all civilizations, Egypt and Mesopotamia were the most developed of all, therefore they had more complex administrative features as well as more
development in the entire population. Agricultural surplus alongside trade is what led to growth of these cities as it also contributed to increase in
population.
Activities and culture of the civilization.
Agriculture was common in all civilizations since only cultures that were based on crop growing became complex civilizations. Others that were
involved in fishing and nomadic pastoralism did not become civilizations. Since techniques of food production, storage and preservation were adapted,
it restricted those who did not practice farming and hence they did not grow in complexity and size.
Structure and way of ruling of government and

How Did The Serfs Affect Feudal Society
Serfs had a place in the feudal system as a low class peasant. Serfs made up the majority of the medieval population, doing grueling work. Serfs
made up most of the population, with a whopping 90%! The population was a larger amount of serfs than knights. Serfs were also known as
farmers, meaning they gave food and crops to villagers. The crops would help sustain them for a long time, and only a few serfs were strong enough
to work in the fields and harvest them, for most serfs caught the Black Plague. The serfs caught Black Plague from fleas in the fields (King 4). Serfs
were bound to land that the lord owned. The serfs provided their own food and clothing from his work. Along with feeding himself, he had to give a
portion to the lord ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Salisbury Oath was an example of how the feudal society worked. The oath wasn't a massive change in the feudal society, but it did have some
effect on services. The feudal oath changed slightly. In feudal law, the members of society still had the same social classes. The oaths kept the feudal
systems in tact. The oaths were helpful to members of society because they had said that each worker had to do his job in the medieval village and
they usually used a sacred oath to God (Birney 85). Feudalism already existed in England at the time, but became stronger and stronger under each
oath made. Changes in law were to be expected, like changes in taxing, military service and even a shift of power was made sometimes. The idea
of feudalism had begun long before members of society realized (Birney 84). The Salisbury Oath was not necessarily a feudal oath. England
practiced feudalism, so all tenants acknowledge a supreme member as their monarch. The members strived for a strong, feudal government, so
William created an oath that was an expansion on feudalism (Birney 85). In feudal times, Oaths were the only source of agreement. Even the
relationship between the feudal lord and the vassal was based on oaths. The Lord made an oath to protect the vassal's family if anything should
happen, and the vassal made an oath to the lord that he would fight with all the effort possible (Conference Page 2). The many, oaths and agreements
between kings and vassals was considered a reciprocal relationship. Oaths also kept the Military in tact, causing knights and vassals to dedicate their
full service to the feudal lord. Without the oaths, the military would crumble, leading to a downfall of feudalism (Conference Page 2). The oaths and
agreements were a severe part of feudalism, causing a stronger

Changes In Feudal Society Between 1625-1789
During the year between 1625–1789, there was a profound change which was witnessed in Britain regarding the position which individuals held in the
society and also in the exercise of authority. As per the constitution, during this period saw a transition from the ideas which were based on the
monarchy and thus these ideas were divine to the parliamentary system whereby all the situations and ideas were based on accountable government.
Regarding the political issues, there was the emergence of the popular press and also the right to the opinion which was within the public, and
therefore the citizens enjoyed this freedom. And in the side of the social issues, the period was marked by the act of clearing the remaining feudal
society which was

Early Western Civilization: Molded by Conflict or Consensus
The question has been posed whether early Western Civilization was molded by conflict between civilizations or by consensus between divergent
civilizations. Although it can be argued that both conflict and consensus have affected the development of Western Civilization, one of these has had
more of an influence than the other. As early as Ca 3000, at the dawn of civilization, there has been conflict. When the city–states of Sumer were
established, warfare and competition broke out due to disagreements on land and water rights. This tradition of conflict has continued throughout
history all the way up to modern times. Based on the outcomes of the many conflicts throughout history, it appears that civilization has been molded
more by these conflicts than consensus between divergent civilizations. Looking at political, cultural, and religious aspects of the history of Western
Civilization, one can see the influence that conflict had on shaping said civilization. The ways that conflict has shaped the political characteristics of
Western Civilization are evident when looking at historic expansions of civilizations and the imperialism that accompanies such expansions. As
leaders expanded their reign and land holdings by conquering other peoples, a need to govern those holdings and citizens arose. As Hammurabi
conducted campaigns to expand his empire, he developed what has become known as Hammurabi's Code to help govern his people. Many of the laws
in the Code still currently

Educational Philosophy of John Dewey Essay
The Educational Philosophy of John Dewey John Dewey is known as leader of the progressive movement in the history of the American education
system and his book, Democracy and Education: an introduction to the philosophy of education, could be used as a textbook to teach the foundations
of the movement. Discrediting all previous educational and philosophic approaches as intellectually incomplete or inaccurate, Dewey first presents a
new perspective on the nature of knowledge, education, society and philosophy. One fundamental theme of Dewey's progressive movement is that
education is growth and that growth is, in and of itself, the objective. Rejecting any notion of innate knowledge or of an ideal goal to strive for, the
progressive ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Societies can be, by definition, small associations of like minded individuals with narrow aims or large nations with broad, diverse aims. Dewey
offers two standards which can be applied to assess the value of a society: How numerous and varied are the interests which are consciously
shared? How full and free is the interplay with other forms of association? By applying these two questions, the natural conclusion of the ideal
society is democratic, that is to say one that offers its citizens the freedom of expression and communication. If a democracy represents an ideal
society that presents the maximum number of common interests and the maximum opportunities for association with other societies, then it also
represents the ideal society in its potential for growth. Any society with a near limitless potential for growth must redefine the concept of
knowledge in order to gain efficiencies in its education system. Previous attempts at defining knowledge were flawed, in the mind of the
Progressivist, by directly stating or implying a division or duality that presents a barrier to free intercourse of ideas. Examples of these dualities are
that of different classes within a society such as rich vs poor, noble vs lower class, ruler vs ruled or that of the physical vs metaphysical worlds. Any
duality serves to separate knowledge from action, a continuity which is proclaimed as ideal. Any piece of

Feudal Society Dbq
While living in a feudal society life was much different than modern day. Many people were considered peasants just for the family they were born
in. A feudal society could be divided into three parts, the social, political, and economic parts. Feudalism was well known during the Middle Ages,
which lasted from 476 CE to the 14th century (OI). Part of the feudal society included social, political, and economic. During the Middle Ages social
class much different than modern day. In a feudal society "nobles were granted the use of land that legally belonged to the king," (Doc. 1). The
nobles, in return, would give the lord loyalty and military services (Doc. 1). As peasants or serfs worked for nobles and knights they received
protection and a portion of the harvest to feed their families (Doc. 1). The role of the Roman Catholic Church also had a big influence on the social
life of people during the Middle Ages. The Roman Catholic Church "touched everyone's life, no matter their rank or class or where they lived," (Doc.
3). The church gave people a sense of belonging. As well, the Code of Chivalry states that "thou shalt respect all weaknesses, and shalt constitute
thyself the defender of them," (Doc. 5). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
5), which can be considered a political part in the feudal society. The church had a great deal of political power. However, leaders only had local
political power (Doc. 3). "Every person was required to live by the Church's laws and to pay heavy taxes to support the Church," (Doc. 3). The
people of the church would be shown in return "the way to everlasting life and happiness after lives that were often short and hard," (Doc. 3). The
church became very powerful and used this this power to "influence kings to do as wanted," (Doc. 3). Many Kings and Queens were protected by the
Church (OI). As the king gave land and protection to people of lower class, the feudal society

Lust, Caution Chapter Summary
In the early twentieth century, New Culture Movement, which aimed at battling against the old, outworn feudal mentality and the Chinese ethic of
self–submission, brought tremendous changes and aroused the collision between tradition and modernity. Guided by "Democracy" and "Science",
more and more people were nurtured by the western modern culture and influenced by the western ideal of freedom, equality and fraternity, including
the long–oppressed Chinese women. Chinese women, who used to be fettered by the feudal ethics and codes, began to enter the public domain and
fight for rights and equality. With the development of female right activities in cities and the prevalence of western culture and thoughts, there emerged
the concept of "New... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Sophie's passion for Lin Jishi was driven by her desire and primitive impulse. When they encountered each other, Sophie was attracted by Lin
Jishi's appearance. "How can I describe the beauty of this strange man? His stature, pale delicate features, fine lips, and soft hair are quite dazzling
enough...How could I admit to anyone that I gazed at those provocative lips like a small hungry eyeing sweets?"16 Sexual desire and pleasure play
a leading role in Sophie's love and passion, which can be seen from Sophie's ambivalent attitude towards Lin Jishi. There is no doubt that Sophie
didn't have spiritual resonance with Lin Jishi and despise Lin Jishi's "really stupid ideas": " What does love mean to him? Nothing more than
spending money in a brothel, squandering it on a moment of carnal pleasure..."17Though realizing Lin Jishi's worldliness and vulgarity, Sophie still
steeped herself in the irresistible temptation from Lin Jishi and expressed her desire for him without any disguise. "When he's here alone with me, I
suffer scouring torment as I stare into his face and listen to the musical sound of his voice. Why don't I crush his mouth kisses, ... his whole
body?"18In the novel Lust, Caution, Eileen Chang implicitly points out that Chia Chih acquired pleasure from sexuality. "In truth, every time she was
with Yee she felt cleansed, as if by a hot bath; for now

Compare And Contrast European And Japanese Feudal Society
The European and Japanese feudal society were both different and similar in many ways. They had different names for their classes, but their
basic structure were the same, from the King/Emperor to the lower class peasants. They all found it hard to move up a class and life was was
especially hard for the lower classes. Warfare and religion played major roles in people's lives and they had priest/monks and Knights/samurai to
fulfill those roles. The European and Japanese feudal systems ended up coinciding with each other at about the same time periods ever though these
societies were separated by thousands of miles. Both societies had either an Emperor or King as their leader and different levels of ruling classes. In
Europe they had the lords, then the vassals, and then the lower class ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Europe had Christianity and Japan had Buddhism. Though they were vastly different, they both held great influence with all the classes. Farming also
had a role in both cultures. In Europe they developed new system called the three–field system. They would plant one field with grain, a second with
peas or beans, and the third they left unplanted. This new method left only one third of the field unplanted instead of half. This way the peasants diet
had more protein and the land had added fertility due to the rotation of crops. With this new production of food, it caused Europe's population to grow
and this enabled the roads and cities to grow along with it. In Japan, they formed a system of government called centralized feudalism. This ended
feudal warfare which enabled the economy to grow and with new seeds, tools and the use of fertilizer they had a greater output of crops. The
population in Japan grew much faster along with the development of cities and roads due to these advances in farming. With the surplus of food,
artisans and merchants emerged as a new wealthy growing class of

Children Living Apart from Families in Totalitarian Societies
In many real life and fictionalized totalitarian societies, children live apart from their families. Why would dictatorial leaders enforce this living
arrangement? In the book Anthem, the children are living in a totalitarian society. This society is usually run by a dictator and there is very little or no
freedom. In totalitarianism, the government or in this case the councils control almost every aspect of life. There is no free speech or freedom of the
press; certain religions or ideas may be banned. "We are one in all and all in one. There are no men but only the great WE, One, indivisible and
forever." This plays a great part in the book because" we" is what the people refer to as themselves. Everyone is equal to each other and there is no "I".
The councils in Anthem believe that no brother should ever rise above one another. No brother should outsmart the other.
Knowledge is a powerful thing. In totalitarian societies children are taken away from their parents at very young ages, so they learn all the same
things. All of the student's knowledge is kept at the same level. All the children know is only what the government teaches them. "It was not that the
learning was too hard for us. It was that the learning was too easy. It is not good to be different from our brothers, but is evil to be superior to them."
This evidence from the book Anthem shows us that it is not a good thing to be smarter than the other student's. It is a sin. Dictators who want to restrain

Was Japan Truly A Feudal Society Essay
An argument that has been fought for hundreds of years is the idea that Japan used to be a feudal society. Along with this, historians still debate over
whether comparative history is good and beneficial for human knowledge and the use of history. Both sides of each idea have facts that both support
and disprove the other. Considering each side of the argument, was Japan truly a feudal society, and does comparative history matter?Feudalism was
meant to sum up the historical experience of the residents of Western Europe during the Middle Ages (Farris). Japan was a feudal society because of
its use of officials and their land, the lack of use of money in the economy, and the samurai, and this supports the idea of comparative history. The fall
of the Carolingian Empire set up the beginning of feudal societies in Europe which would then lead into Japan. After the Carolingian Empire fell, the
land was divided to three heirs who fought each other for more power. Other people, like the Muslims, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Everybody at that time used farming, but they still used a tiny bit of money. The aristocrats were the ones with the power and wanted to avoid
paying taxes. Because of this, the common people did not want to pay taxes either. So, the commoners would join their land with the lord for
protection and avoid taxes in return for military and a rent. (Duiker 306). Money was now only going to a select group of people and not getting
spread around. Like Europe, trading hit rock bottom. More money with only the aristocrats made more commoners join them, so they got more
money while less money was put out to the people. Government officials only got a little portion of money from these lords if they protected the
lord's' land. It was a vicious cycle to the government as they could only get a little amount of money while the lords amassed tons of

Essay Human Nature and Proper Order
Proper Order in Confucianism and as taught primarily by Mencius, the Chinese philosopher, is the conceptual theory that instructs how people can
reach their highest potential of moral and material well being embodied in Mencius' conception of human nature. The theory of proper order is the
primary and philosophical means to that end. Although proper order may seem in many ways philosophically abstract, Mencius' teachings of proper
order in history have had lasting and tangible effects on modern East Asian politics and its relationship between the state and society, and even on a
narrower level of the individual and community. In fact, the theory of proper order starts first at the individual level and from there flourishes to create a
The conception of human nature is one of the most fundamental concepts that has come to characterize much of East Asian thought and behavior and
which its effects can still be found today. The Chinese philosopher who can be credited with establishing the definition of human nature whichEast Asia
recognizes with today is Mencius. Mencius lived during a period of seemingly perpetual warfare and great upheaval within China called the Warring
States Period (Lecture). During this violet period in China's history a change was taking place in the development of warfare, which was becoming
increasingly brutal and prevalent throughout the region, taking a terrible toll on lives lost. "During these uncertain times Mencius travelled from one
feudal state to another, speaking to the rulers about government, deploring the effects of warfare on the people, and pleading the case for the
practicality of humaneness" (De Bary 114). Mencius helped change the perspective of leaders which precipitated "changes in values in the time of
Confucius in the subsequent Warring States period" (De Barry 114). Because of this effort, Mencius is regarded as one of the greatest founding thinkers
on Confucius thought, and his commitment and belief in the value of the common citizen is a significant influence that helped steer China to a more
peaceful state of affairs. In interpreting what the value of the common citizen is to the governing

Feudal Society In The Middle Ages
Medieval Times – Feudal Society And Knights Essay
The basic government and society in Europe during the middle ages was based around the feudal system. Small communities were formed around
the local lord and he owned everything in it. After the fall of the Roman Empire, a lot of the Roman culture and knowledge was the lost. This
included items such as art to technology. The Medieval period went from 500AD to 1500AD, it was a long period in history which lasted for 1000
years. This time in history was a time of castles and peasants and the main leader was Joan of Arc. It was seperated into social hierachy which was
called feudalism. Most of the people living were peasants and they had a very hard life. Although the feudal system was believed to help the lives of
those living in the time. They were the Pope, the King, the Barons, the Knights, the Farmers and the Craftsmen and then last were the Landless
Peasents. The feudal system links back to the modern era as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The king is the leader, the king was the leader of the land. The king could not control the land all by himself so he had to divide it up amongst the
Barons. The Barons would then pledge their loyalty to the king. When one king had stayed in power for a long time he was then granted a dynasty
and when a king died his son would then take on the role of a king. The bishop in the feudal system was the top church leader. The Catholic Church
made the bishop very powerful in most parts of Medieval Europe. The peasents were the lowest of the feudal system and they had a very rough life
as they were always working for others. Although some peasents were free and they could own their small businesses such as bakers. Although most
of them were like slaves. They had no ownership of anything and they had pledged to their lord. They worked 6 days a week and often barely had
enough food to survive. The peasents had a very hard

The Fall Of The Gupta Empire
Numerous empires and civilizations have risen and fallen in many nations since time began like the Romans, Aztecs, and the Mongols. These empires
were powerful with their control over many riches, people and land masses; however they all experienced a decline in power. Throughout history
scholars regarded India as a great and accomplished nation. Notable civilizations emerged from Indian culture specifically during the classical period.
For example civilizations like the Mauryan Empire and the Gupta Empire are well known zeniths of Indian culture. Between the early fourth and the
mid sixth century, India experienced the rise and fall of one of its zeniths of civilization . Although the Gupta Empire is known as one of India's major
zeniths, it experienced a decline due to leadership, invasions, and rebellions. The fall of the Gupta Empire could have been prevented by improving
leadership and overall environment.
The Gupta Empire experienced great cultural accomplishments and achievements while it was in power. There were specific things valued in ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Great civilization and empires can collapse as a result of rebellions. New nations are born out of the groups that secede from larger ones. As the new
civilizations arise the old ones continue to decline and lose the power they held before. The internal structure of an empire must remain strong or the
empire will not stand. Internal rebellions break empires down and strip them of their leadership. The Gupta Empire was victim to numerous internal
rebellions. Groups around places like Magadh fought for independence. As one civilization broke away others followed suit. The central authority over
the empire weakened as these fight broke out. . With the Gupta Empire breaking apart and full of numerous fragmented shambles the civilization
continued to decrease until it eventually did not

What Makes A Society Feudal?
What makes a society feudal? To answer this I am going to look at two important ideas which Duus brings up. The first important idea that he presents
is that feudalism has no definition that everyone agrees on, which has created controversy surrounding the question of Japan 's Feudalism. Duus
addresses this controversy and then shows that he believes Japan did indeed have feudalism due to having many similarities with European feudalism.
The second important point is that the vassal system, particularly that of military men, is a defining feature in Japan 's feudalism. He shows that the
rise, and later decline, of the vassal system is crucial in holding together Japan 's feudalism. When vassals began to shift from a military focus to a
more aristocratic one, the feudal system declined and eventually faded entirely. The first important idea is that there is disagreement on what
feudalism is, and that despite the different interpretations of the word, Duus shows that due to Japan 's similar traits with Western Europe, he believes
Japan to have gone through a Feudal period. He explains that there are two extremes for the definition of feudalism. The first extreme is that
feudalism is exclusive to Western Europe, particularly northern France. The second extreme is the Marxist view that all societies go through a feudal
stage as they pass from ancient society to a modern society. The middle ground opinion is that a feudal system is not exclusive to Western Europe, and
is a

The Hundred Years ' War And Feudal Society
The Hundred Years' War and Feudal Society Why did the feudal order of Medieval society fall apart? The feudal order of the Middle Ages was a
system of local rule, where powerful lords gave land and protection in exchange for loyalty and military service from lesser lords. Tradition
dictated that this exchange would be held in place by the feudal contract, consisting of multiple pledges. This resulted in small communities
consisting of one powerful lord, peasants, and serfs who worked for the lord. These people gave their loyalty locally, and had no sense of
nationalism. This type of society was predominant in the Early Middle Ages, but soon started to fall apart during the Late Middle Ages. One major
event that contributed to the fall of the feudal society was the Hundred Years' War. This war was fought between England and France, lasting for a
total of 116 years. During the war, peasant uprisings became frequent, as the inordinate cost of military campaigns resulted in heavier taxes. Events
such as these were caused by the Hundred Years' War and further contributed to the decline of feudalistic society. The Hundred Years' War was the most
important cause of the fall of the feudal order, acting as a turning point in Medieval society by marking the transition from feudal knights to the masses
of common foot soldiers, changing the balance of power within Medieval social hierarchies, and strengthening nationalism while creating a more
modern militaristic society. First,

School Systems And The Feudal Society Of The Middle Ages

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from April Ford

More from April Ford (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

School Systems And The Feudal Society Of The Middle Ages