2. ī° Introduction
ī° Definitions
ī° Pathology Information System
ī° Basic design criteria
ī° Additional features
ī° Laboratory Information System
ī° Role of Informatics
3. Introduction
ī° 20th
century - histologic evaluation of tissue by
pathologist - single most information rich and
decisive, diagnostic assessment tool available
4. Introduction
ī° 21st
century
ī° Information & communication technologies - changes in
health services
ī° Parallel methodologies - gene analysis, molecular basis
of disorder & drug susceptibilities
ī° Provide information rich data streams to aid diagnoses
& treatment
5. Challenge to historic role of pathologist
ī° To meet these challenges - need to merge these
methods & other data stream with traditional approaches
of tissue assessment
ī° Requires development of a pathology information system
ī° Data integration from diverse modalities , data
presentation & decision support
ī° These activities fall under the emerging field of
Pathology Informatics
6. Definition
ī° Informatics:
īŽ Study of application of
Information Technology
ī° Acquiring, storing,
processing & retrieving
analysed data
ī° Convert data into
information
ī° Medical Informatics: Study
of application of information
technology to medical
science & health care
delivery
7. 7
Components of Medical Informatics
ī° Information Technology
īŽ Health care
īŽ Research
īŽ Education
ī° Fundamentals
īŽ Clinical Information
Management
īŽ Knowledge Management
īŽ Decision support
īŽ Communication
9. Current vs. Integrated Approach
Current Method: Integrated Approach:
Medical records written on
paper forms by doctors,
some information stored in
private database
Data typed into electronic
forms which are
connected to a central
database or network of
databases
Ptâs original records stored at
care facility where treatment
took place
Records must be manually
faxed if needed by a different
care facility.
Data stored in a protected
database which can be
accessed remotely with
correct authorization
10. Pathology Informatics
ī° Discipline & practice of
using electronic
information systems
ī° To facilitate, promote &
advance practice of
pathology
īŽ patient care
īŽ understanding of
disease
īŽ education
11. Pathology Informatics
ī° Laboratories & Anatomic pathology - digitized /
automated
Information derived from various sources
Standardized & coded "machine consumable" data
Integrated reports communicate with multiple hospital
systems
12. Pathology Informatics
ī° Data need to be exchanged between multiple,
heterogeneous systems
ī° For representing & communicating information â well
defined standards needed
ī° Standards needed for :
īŽ Transferring patient data across different systems
īŽ Representing medical knowledge that can be reused
14. SNOMED
ī° Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine
ī° Coded medical nomenclature, which allows recording of
all disease entities regardless of prevalence
ī° Developed & supported by College of American
Pathologists
ī° Comprehensive clinical terminology that is used to:
īŽ Code
īŽ Retrieve &
īŽ Analyze clinical data
15. ICD-10
īŽ International standard classification for all
general epidemiological, many health
management purposes and clinical use
īŽ 3-digit codes
īŽ Used in ~110 countries for cause of death
reporting & statistics
17. Logical Observations, Identifiers,
Names and Codes (LOINC)
ī° Database & universal standard for identifying medical
laboratory observations
ī° Created in response to demand for an electronic
database for clinical care & management
ī° Database has expanded to include medical & laboratory
code names
ī° Purpose - assist in electronic exchange & gathering of
clinical results (such as laboratory tests, clinical
observations, outcomes management and research)
18. Information systems in pathology
ī° Rapid pace of workflow - efficient methods to collect,
store, display & distribute data generated
ī° At one end of information system - specimen received
& accessioned & at other end analyzed into
âpathology reportâ
ī° Report must be accessible to all those who need it,
ensuring confidentiality
ī° Pathology Information System â Foundation for critical
information handling
19. Information systems in pathology
ī° Pathology laboratory information system â
Comprehensive software that manages laboratory
workflow & reporting
ī° Properly implemented enhance
īŽ Ability to store, organize & retrieve prodigious
amounts of information
īŽ Efficiency of surgical pathology laboratory
īŽ Improve quality of services
īŽ Monitor quality assurance parameters
īŽ Aid in research
20. Information systems in pathology
ī° First such software
developed at
īŽ Tufts University
(SURGPATH)
īŽ Massachusettsâs
General Hospital
(CAPER)
īŽ Yale University
(CoPATH)
21.
22.
23. Basic design criteria
ī° To allow pathologist
to work independently
of the computer
ī° Elimination of
redundant data entry
ī° Real time integration
of data from all
aspects of diagnostic
pathology
24. Basic design criteria
ī° On-line permanent and
safe storage of all
primary data
ī° Rapid response time
ī° Flexible & easily
modified design
25. Automated Anatomical Pathology System
ī° Operates on computer dedicated to anatomic pathology
ī° Terminals linked to system installed at foll places:
īŽ Staff offices
īŽ Sign out areas
īŽ Secretarial areas & Administration
īŽ Cytology
īŽ Histology
īŽ Surgical pathology gross room
īŽ Autopsy room
ī° Similar terminals placed throughout hospital
29. Surgical pathology
ī° Accomplishes all tasks performed in surgical pathology
laboratory
ī° On accessioning a new specimen
â information on the patient, specimen, submitting
physician etc. collected
ī° Information on âtype of specimenâ captured - allows
computer to obtain preliminary information
30. Surgical pathology
ī° Specimen of breast resection
ī° Entering âBREâ â computer responds by asking the user
to select from:
1. Breast: Biopsy
2. Breast: Resection for Cancer
3. Breast: Reduction Mammoplasty( Not Cancer)
ī° To anticipate
īŽ proper procedure for grossing specimen
īŽ Generate customized data labels
īŽ Provide specific instructions to technicians & pathologist
31. Surgical pathology
ī° All information & protocols generated by selection of
âspecimen typeâ
- derived from user defined âdictionariesâ
ī° All text entries ( e.g gross description, final diagnosis)
- made directly in appropriate data field
- simple text editor/word processor
ī° All aspects of the case - edited simultaneously by
different users
32. Surgical pathology
ī° All text fields allow
īŽ free text entry or
īŽ choices of user defined âcannedâ text
īŽ forms & check lists for standardized reporting
diagnoses for major tumor types
ī° Diagnoses entered may be
īŽ âPreliminaryâ report â cases requiring special studies;
reads as â âpoorly differentiated carcinoma, specific
type pending IHCâ
īŽ âFinalâ report
33. Surgical pathology
ī° Many standard reports generated by system â 2 most
common being:
īŽ Working Draft
ī° Printed on completion of gross dictation
- contains synopsis of all previous/current related clinical
history
- cytology & other data
- full text of gross description
ī° Pathologist may record diagnosis on this sheet or
enter it directly into terminal
īŽ Finished format report
ī° Signed electronically & made immediately
available
34. Surgical pathology
ī° Standard Inquiry âdisplays full text of
īŽ Gross description
īŽ Diagnosis, amendments to diagnosis
īŽ Information on special procedures
īŽ Date each task completed
īŽ Other data - gross photograph taken
- tissue saved
- special fixatives used
- status of slides preparation
35. Surgical pathology
ī° For use outside department - separate inquiry options
īŽ simplified presentation of diagnostic information
īŽ other options provide detailed information on status of
microscopic slides & special stains for each case
36. Cytology
ī° Similar to functioning of surgical pathology section
ī° Major difference
īŽ makes extensive use of case/type- specific
questionnaires
īŽ only relevant questions asked at time of accessioning
ī° On accessioning slides - labels automatically generated
contg:
īŽ Patient name
īŽ Slide designation
īŽ Cytology number
37. Cytology
ī° Reporting cytology specimens facilitated by using
âchecklistâ
ī° Cytotechnologist selects predefined features recognized
in smear
ī° From these checklists computer automatically SNOMED
codes specimen
ī° Decides which specimens reqd to be reviewed by
pathologist( based on predefined criteria)
ī° Generate a completed full text report
ī° Quality control review - captures a percentage of cases
38.
39. Autopsy
ī° Complete morgue registration system
ī° Handles all aspects of autopsy report preparation
ī° Unlike surgical/cytology section - unlimited text &
âcannedâ text entries
ī° âSpecimen typeâ concept also used in autopsy section
- To generate case specific autopsy worksheets
ī° Provide a measure of increased quality control in
autopsy room
40. Department - wide options
ī° General search capabilities of system in this section
ī° Two search options provided â
īŽ Disease Search option
īŽ Report Generator
41. Department - wide options
Disease Search option
ī° Involves finding of cases with certain diagnoses or
combination of diagnoses
ī° Done using SNOMED search option
42. Department - wide options
Report generator
ī° Software package - arbitrary search over any of data
items captured in system
ī° Output format â user defined
ī° Any type of report can be compiled with this option
43. Systems manager
ī° Allows editing of all dictionaries used in system
ī° Provides a number of other maintenance &
administrative features
ī° All transactions in systems manager leave an audit trail
ī° Access to this section strictly limited to staff members
44. Histology & IHC laboratory
ī° Handles all functions related to preparation of slides from
handling of specimens
ī° Begins in grossing room
īŽ Pathologist enters directly into the terminal
īŽ Information on - number of blocks & tissue
pieces submitted
- any special request for
stains, recuts etc
ī° For routine specimens â information needed is already
anticipated by computer based on âspecimen typeâ, only
needed to be verified
45. Histology & IHC laboratory
ī° All worksheets in histology lab
īŽ Generated automatically from entries in grossing
room
īŽ Contain all information necessary for slide preparation
ī° All requests for special stain, recuts etc - entered directly
into system & appear on âSPECIAL STAINâ log
ī° All slide labels printed automatically
ī° For special stains - labels contain type of stain & date of
procedure
46. Molecular genetic laboratory
ī° Provides a separate registration system
ī° Fully integrated with surgical pathology & cytology
sections
Miscellaneous
ī° Contains items such as grading & staging manual for
major tumor types
48. Digital Pathology
ī° Whole slide imaging
(WSI), digital imaging,
virtual slides, virtual
microscopy
ī° Use of computer
technology to convert
microscopic images
into digital images
50. Digital Pathology
ī° Scan - Digital slides
created using scanning
device
ī° View - Digital slides
viewed via viewing
software on computer
monitor
51. Digital Pathology
ī° Manage - Digital slides
maintained in information
management system that
allows for archival &
retrieval
ī° Analyze - Image analysis
tools for objective
quantification measures
52. Digital Pathology
ī° Integrate â Workflow
integrated into institution's
operational environment
ī° Sharing - internet
information sharing for
education, diagnostics,
publication & research
53. Utility of Digital Pathology
ī° View images even over large distances via the Internet
ī° Share exactly same image with colleagues at same time
ī° Clinico-pathological conferences without glass slides
ī° Automate & optimize pathology workflow
54. Digital Pathology Applications
1. Education and Training
- allows viewing of
virtual slides by large
numbers of students
simultaneously
- advantage- all
students view exactly
the same slide at the
same time
55. Digital Pathology Applications
2. Diagnosis
- easy consultation
(without any need to
physically transport the
slides)
- rare diseases
- Instant frozen section
diagnosis over the
Internet
56. Digital Pathology Applications
3. Tissue Micro Array (TMA)
- scanner & TMA software
- segment TMA slides into
cores
- Assist in manual, semi-
automatic / automatic
scoring
- Link individual scores with
patient ID in database
- Perform data mining and
statistics in huge databases
57. Digital Pathology Applications
4. Image Analysis
- Quantify nuclear, cellular or membrane markers
- Count cells, nuclei or more complex structures
- Use powerful morphometry tools
5. Archiving
- Virtual slides - stored locally on computer systems
- Allows easy retrieval for retrospective studies
58. Virtual Microscopy ideal method for
following applications
ī° Remote diagnostic viewing
ī° Clinical remote consultation
ī° Group presentations and discussion
ī° Student education
ī° Case libraries and tissue databanks
ī° Large-volume software-aided image analysis
59. Telepathology
ī° Practice of pathology at a
distance
ī° Uses telecommunications
technology
ī° To facilitate transfer of
image-rich pathology data
b/w distant locations
ī° For the purposes of
diagnosis, education &
research
60. Telepathology
Divided into three major
types:
ī° Static image-based
systems
- benefit - most
reasonably priced &
usable systems
- drawback - capture a
only a selected subset
of microscopic fields
for off-site evaluation
61. Telepathology
ī° Real-time systems
- robotic microscopy systems & virtual slides
- allow consultant pathologist to evaluate HPE slides in
entirety, from a distance
- consultant actively operates robotically controlled
motorized microscope
- located at a distant siteâchanging focus, illumination,
magnification, & field of viewâat will
- perform best on local area networks (LANs)
63. Telepathology
ī° Virtual slide system
- utilize automated digital slide scanners to create digital
image
- stored on computer server & can be navigated at a
distance, over the Internet using a browser
- emerging as the technology of choice for telepathology
services
65. Uses & Benefits of Telepathology
ī° Wide spectrum clinical applications
īŽ diagnosing of frozen section specimens
īŽ primary histopathology diagnoses
īŽ second opinion diagnoses
īŽ subspecialty pathology expert diagnoses
īŽ education, compentency assessment & research
66. Digital speech recognition
ī° Converts spoken words
to text
ī° âVoice recognition" -
recognition systems
trained to a particular
speakerâ voice
ī° Front-end or back-end of
medical documentation
process
67. Digital speech recognition
ī° Front-End SR
- provider dictates into
speech-recognition
engine
- recognized words
displayed right after they
are spoken
- dictator responsible for
editing & signing off on
document
68. Digital speech recognition
ī° Back-End SR / Deferred SR
- provider dictates into digital dictation system
- voice routed through speech-recognition machine
- recognized draft document routed to the MT/editor
- MT edits draft & finalizes report
69. Digital speech recognition
ī° Electronic Medical Records (EMR) - more effective &
performed easily when in conjunction with speech-
recognition engine
ī° Searches, queries, & form filling - all may be faster to
perform by voice than by using a keyboard
71. Lab Information System - Key Steps
ī° Register patient - Patient record created in LIS
ī° LIS automatically receives data from hospital registration
system (when pt admitted)
ī° Order tests - Physician orders tests to be drawn as part
of laboratory's morning bld collection
ī° Order entered into the HIS & electronically sent to the
LIS
72. Lab Information System - Key Steps
ī° Collect sample - Before collection, LIS prints list of all
pts & appropriate number of sample bar code labels for
each patient printed
ī° Each bar code has - patient ID, sample container type
and laboratory workstation
ī° Another approach - patient caregivers/nurses to collect
sample
ī° Prior to collection, bar code labels printed (on demand)
at nursing station on LIS printer
73. Lab Information System - Key Steps
ī° Receive sample - on arrival in laboratory, status to be
updated in LIS from âcollectedâ to âreceivedâ
īŽ Can be done by scanning each sample container's
bar code ID into LIS
ī° Once sample âreceivedâ - LIS transmits test order to
analyzer
ī° Run sample - sample loaded onto analyzer & bar code
is read
īŽ analyzer knows which tests to perform on patient â as
test order from LIS already been received
ī° No worklist needed
74. Lab Information System - Key Steps
ī° For manually performed tests - technologist prints
worklist from LIS - contains list of patients & tests
ordered on each
ī° Next to each test is a space to record result
ī° Review results - analyzer produces results & send to
LIS
ī° Results viewable only to technologists as they have not
been released for general viewing
ī° LIS can be programmed to flag critical values
75. Lab Information System - Key Steps
ī° Release results - technologist releases results
īŽ Unflagged results usually reviewed & released at
same time
ī° LIS can be programmed to automatically review &
release normal results or results that fall within a certain
range
ī° Latter approach reduces number of tests that
technologist has to review
ī° On release
- Results automatically transmitted to HIS
- Physician can view results on HIS screen
76. Pathology Informatics - Specific tasks
1. Modification of existing information systems â
ī° Integrating data with clinical laboratory , radiology,
pharmacy, medical records & all systems collecting
information of medical relevance
ī° Pathology systems - properly formatted, organized &
highest stds of security
77. Pathology Informatics - Specific tasks
2. Adoption of methodologies & techniques â
ī° Quantitative & rationalized indexing of primary data
ī° Data collection, organization, interpretation,
presentation, & decision-making algorithms
3. Expanded recognition & support for Path Informatics as
legitimate subdiscipline of pathology
80. Conclusion
ī° Pathology Informatics â moving rapidly to keep
up with advances in pathology diagnostics
ī° Facilitate in quality assurance, internal
workflow, clinical services & academic
endeavors
ī° Rapid advances occurring in the fields of digital
imaging & telepathology
ī° An integrated pathology workstation with
capability of photographing, scanning &
sharing images is the future of pathology
81. References
ī° Rosai and Ackermanâs Surgical pathology 9th
volume. Chapter 1-
Introduction:14-22
ī° Modern Surgical Pathology 2nd
edition. Chapter 4- Anatomic
Pathology Information Systems:36-47
ī° Henry's Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory
Methods, 21st
edition.Chapter11:214-230
ī° Sinard JH, Morrow Jon S.Informatics and Anatomic
Pathology:Meeting Challenges and Charting the Future. Hum
Pathology 2001,32:143-148
ī° Reinhold Haux. Health information systems- past, present, future.
International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006,75: 268â281
ī° Elizabeth A. Krupinsnki. Optimising the pathology workstation
âcockpitâ:Challenges and solutions International Journal of Medical
Informatics 2010,1: 14 -19
Editor's Notes
Major challenge facing pathologists - how to best optimize pathology workstation
Ensure efficient & accurate processing of information
Informatics is more than information technology, it is the development and application of IT systems to problems in health care, research, and education. (Masys et al., 2000) The fundamentals of informatics include: communication, knowledge management, decision support and the management of clinical information (Scherger, personal communication), without which clinicians cannot be truly effective. As practitioners attempt to keep abreast of the burgeoning information base â there are nearly 10,000 randomized controlled trials annually â it has become clear, as David Eddy has said, that the complexity of health care âexceeds the inherent limitations of the unaided human mind.â (Millenson, 1997)
Here is a diagram that shows these four areas of Medical Informatics. I will revisit this from time to time to illustrate a point. Currently there are largely stand alone products that fall in one of these areas.
Increase in volume of data - led to development of new processes & tools for information mgmt
Non electronic storage of that information is impractical, hence computer becomes indispensable tool for informatics
1. Few pathologists would welcome a system that asked them to alter their way of phrasing a report, however some would resist a system that forces them to change their way of reporting
Therefore the first and foremost desgn requirement of any system must be to allow the pathologists to work independently of the computer without sacrificing the advantages of system
With increasing familiarity to computers this criteria is becoming less important
2. Second desirable feature for effective automation is avoidance of redundant data entry. Each data item relating to case (pt name, No of blocks, special stains) should ideally involve a single human intervention
All derivative information should be autmatically assigned by computer eg diagnoses codes
This principla should apply even to enquiry of patient data to make it possible to retrieve information by just identifying only a portion of name or diagnoses
3. Eg specimen of a patient may be simultaneously received cytology, surgoical pathology, flow cytometry etc.
The sytem should automatically bring to attention of each user on all previous & current specimens details
Must be able to simultaneously correlate input from multiple users whether they are working on different aspects of same case or different specimens of same patient
Also it should automatically inform each user pertinent information regardless of when it was entered
4. Must be able to permantly store âon-lineâ all information about case (gross & microscopic)
On-line storage cost effective & practical, Eliminates the need to store hard copies of patients record if adequate precaution taken to safe guard the data
Safeguard- all entries must be simulataneously stored on 2 separate devices, copies of all data must be backed up daily
Complete machine readable copies of data must be stored off-site & archival copies of data on magnetic tapes must be stored permanently at regular intervals
5 An acceptable automated computer system must provide rapid response times for all routine tasks. Any system that takes >than a second for routine patient related enquiries or > tha few seconds for simple diagnosis based searches on patients files is frustating in daily use
 picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) have been developed in an attempt to provide economical storage, rapid retrieval of images, access to images acquired with multiple modalities, and simultaneous access at multiple sites".[1] Electronic images and reports are transmitted digitally via PACS; this eliminates the need to manually file, retrieve, or transport film jackets. The universal format for PACS image storage and transfer is DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine)
So, what does all of that âregulatory languageâ mean? Here is a graphic of each of the components in WSI systems. As you can see the optical microscope is only one component of the system. We consider other components such as, image acquisition, processing and the display new technology for this intended use. In addition the use of WSI for primary diagnosis of surgical pathology specimens encompasses not only neoplastic disease but the entire spectrum of human pathologic diagnoses and carries the risk of serious public health consequences if erroneous results are rendered using these systems. Therefore, WSI can not be considered exempt from premarket submission requirements.
and that they can focus their attention on the slide contents itself instead of fiddling around with glass slides and old microscopes
interpretation and quantification of disease state by examining a tissue section depends on the knowledge and skill of an individual pathologist and is therefore inherently affected by a certain level of subjectivity.
In the medical field, efficiency and sharing of information are proportional. To illustrate this, think about rare case diagnoses. Some diseases are so rare and come with very variable morphology that even highly skilled experts will submit opinions that show variation. This indicates that really a collection of experts is needed to reliably diagnose such cases. This is one aspect where virtual microscopy may become indispensable to improve diagnoses, both in quality and time, under the circumstance that availability of experts is scarce. In fact, where several days or weeks would be needed to send the physical slides to each expert, every expert of the network can access simultaneously and remotely a virtual slide simply over the Internet, making diagnoses possible much quicker. In addition, there's no risk of losing or damaging a valuable physical slide during transport.
The physical bulk of large physical slide collections have created massive storage and accessibility problems.
immediate access to off-site pathologists for rapid frozen section diagnoses. Another benefit can be gaining direct access to subspecialty pathologists such as a kidney pathologist (renal pathologist), nervous system pathologist ([neuropathologist]), and skin pathologist ([dermatopathologist]), for immediate consultations.
so that a technologist can easily identify what needs to be repeated or further evaluated
present role: The âSteady as she Goesâ model.The proliferation of alternative information- rich data streams provided by reference labs, electronic medical records, pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, etc., compete with the diagnostic evaluation provided by pathologists.Pathology information systems manage the flow of this information to the clinician decision-maker, who depends increasingly on computer-aided, decision- support systems (inner dark circle) to accurately and most effectively interpret this information for the benefit of the patient
.(C) Alternate Future of AP Informatics: The âPathologist as Diagnostic Specialist.â The proliferation of alternative information-rich data streams are used effectively by the pathologist to improve patient management decisions.Pathology information systems are critical to this task, because they manage the flow of this information to the pathologist and provide computeraided, decision support (inner dark circle) to assist the pathologist in the interpretation of this information for the benefit of the patient.