Analysis Of Alexander IIi The Great King Of Macedonia And...

Analysis Of Alexander IIi The Great King Of Macedonia And...
"Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won 't taste good."
~Joe Paterno. Alexander III the Great, King of Macedonia and conqueror of the Persian Empire is
considered to be one of the best military geniuses of all times. He was inspiration for conquerors to
come such as Hannibal, Napoleon, and Pompey along side Caesar. Alexander was born in 356 BC in
Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia.1 Alexander's childhood had a major impact on his later life
and his military strive. At a young age Alexander watched his father turn Macedonia into a mass
military power. His father won many great battles all throughout the Balkans. When he was just
twelve years old, he showed off his horse riding skills to his father and many others. He tamed a
Bucephalus, a rowdy steed. Bucephalus was supposedly unable to be ridden, and all who had tried
to tame it had their flesh "devoured". When he was 13, his father Philip hired philosopher Aristotle
to be his teacher. For three years Alexander learned about science, medicine, and philosophy. In 340
BC, when Alexander was only 16 years old, Phillip invaded Trace and left Alexander in charge of
Macedonia. While he was in power a Thracian tribe posed a threat, and Alexander constructed an
army and lead them against the rebels. Not only were the Thracian rebels defeated, but also
Alexander captured their stronghold and named it Alexandropolis after himself.1 Once Alexander
turned 18 his father made him one
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Alexander III Research Paper
Following his father's assassination, Alexander III was advised that it would be difficult for him to
be kept safe at the Winter Palace. As a result, Alexander relocated his family to the Gatchina Palace,
located twenty miles south of St. Petersburg, making it his primary residence. Under heavy guard he
would make occasional visits into St. Petersburg, but even then he would stay in the Anichkov
Palace, as opposed to the Winter Palace. In the 1860s Alexander fell madly in love with his mother's
lady–in–waiting, Princess Maria Elimovna Meshcherskaya. Dismayed to learn that Prince
Wittgenstein had proposed to her in spring 1866, he told his parents that he was prepared to give up
his rights of succession in order to marry his beloved "Dusenka". On 19 May 1866, Alexander II
informed his son that Russia had come to an agreement with the parents of Princess Dagmar of
Denmark, his fourth cousin. Before then, she had been the fiancée of his late elder brother Nicholas.
At first Alexander refused to travel to Copenhagen, declaring that he did not love Dagmar and his
desire to marry Maria. In response the enraged emperor ordered Alexander to go straight to
Denmark and propose to Princess Dagmar. The Tsesarevich then ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This tension was reflected in the rivalry between Maria Feodorovna and Vladimir's wife, Grand
Duchess Marie Pavlovna.[9] Alexander had better relationships with his other brothers: Alexei
(whom he made rear admiral and then a grand admiral of the Russian Navy), Sergei (whom he made
governor of Moscow) and Paul. Despite the antipathy that Alexander had towards his stepmother,
Princess Catherine Dolgorukov, he nevertheless allowed her to remain in the Winter Palace for some
time after his father's assassination and to retain various keepsakes of him. These included
Alexander II's blood–soaked uniform that he died wearing, and his reading

Romanov Dynasty Research Paper
The Romanov Dynasty held control of power in the Russian Empire for over three centuries, from
1613 to 1917. The Romanov family accelerated Russia into becoming a major European power that
would last until present times. Russia's last dynasty began with Mikhail Romanov being crowned as
Tsar in 1613 after the Time of Troubles ("Who Were the Romanovs?"). The Time of Troubles in
Russia's history refers to the time from 1598 and 1613. This period marks the years between the fall
of the Rurik Dynasty, and the creation of the Romanov Dynasty (The Editors of Encyclopædia
Britannica). The Russian Assembly of the Land ultimately handed the title over to Mikhail after a
number of other Russian nobles declined the crown. The descendants of Mikhail held the crown
captive, despite ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With the war ending disastrously for Russia, there were many repercussions that were felt across the
vast Empire, mainly dealing with the economy. This backlash led a group of dissidents to peacefully
protest against the autocratic government (McCallen). To halt the protests, Nicholas II approved the
construction of an assembly based on representation, which would later be called the Duma. With
this newly found assembly, Nicholas promised to initiate reforms to progress the nation further,
which ended quickly. Due to the rising levels of dissent against the government, revolutionary
groups began to form. Out of these groups, the most notable is the Bolsheviks ("Romanov Family
Executed"). The devastating defeats that Russia faced when the nation joined in the fight of World
War I brought about even higher levels disunity across the state. These defeats led to a widespread
shortage of food and created widespread fear of war throughout the commoners (McCallen). The
Tsar ever–increasing number of tribulations faced by the government showed the inadequacy
Nicholas II had as a

Alexander The Great Of Alexander IIi Of Macedon
Alexander The Great Alexander III of Macedon Riding Bucephalus Into Battle Alexander III of
Macedon or Alexander The Great was born on 20/21 July 356 BC in Pella, Macedon. He was the
son of the king of Macedon. Alexander was many things, he was a prince, a king, a general, and
much more. Alexander's father was the King of Macedon, Philip II and his mother was his father's
fourth wife, Olympias, she was the daughter of Neoptolemus I, the king of Epirus. When Alexander
was very young he was raised by a nurse, Lanike. Years later Alexander Aristotle And Alexander
was tutored by Leonidas, a relative of his mother, and by Lysimachus of Acarnania. Alexander was
raised in the manner of noble Macedonian youths, learning to read, play the lyre, ride, fight, and
hunt. One of the days Alexander was 12, he tamed a horse wilder than the others, named
Bucephalus, who he rode until the day the horse died. When Alexander was 13 he started learning
from the philosopher Aristotle. As payment for becoming Alexander,'s personal tutor. King Philip
promised Aristotle that he would rebuild his hometown Stageira, which Philip had destroyed. As
well as freeing previous citizens from slavery and reinstating exiled people. Aristotle taught
Alexander and other nobel's children medicine, philosophy, morals, religion, logic, and art. In 340
Alexander had to end his schooling from Aristotle, when Marble Statue Of Alexander his father left
to battle Thrace. His father left the Macedonian kingdom under

Compare and contrast Alexander II and Alexander III Essay
Compare and contrast Alexander II and Alexander III
Although they were father and son, the reigns of Alexander II and Alexander III took off in
completely different directions. Alexander II was committed to his empire by vowing to reform
Russia, making it more in line with nineteenth–century western society. His son, on the other hand,
was the unprepared tsar, whose actions were literally reactions to his father's unexpected
assassination. Consequently, Alexander II went down in history as much more productive in the
field of domestic policy; in dealing with revolutionaries; and in his foreign policy than his son Alex
III would ever be.
1855 was a tough time for Alexander II to take the throne. Russia was in the middle of a costly war
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Alexander III's stance on domestic issues came as no surprise. As a youngster, he was tutored by
Konstantin Pobodonestev, a conservative, forceful man who strongly opposed Western ideology.
Pobodonestev's ideas and beliefs rubbed off on the young boy, and he blamed his father's liberal–
minded reforms as the cause for his murder. Seeking to strengthen the autocracy, he gave officials
the power to declare a state of emergency, and to arrest or fine anyone unreliable. He also cleverly
cut off schools by setting up discriminatory admission rules, against women, poor families, and the
Jews. He then forced the expansion of Russian culture and language by forcing everyone in the
nation to speak, write, and think in Russian; otherwise known as Russification. Alexander III
preferred having as much control as possible over his people, something he did not have in common
with his father.
Despite all the work Alexander II did toward reforming Russia, the "Era of Great Reforms" left one
crucial aspect unaltered: the power of the emperor. The intentional neglect of this was what kept the
reforms from realizing their true potential. This led to dissatisfaction, which encouraged repression,
terror, and most importantly: revolution. The first was the Polish Rebellion, caused by the failure of
Russian authorities to suppress Polish nationalism. Although the Poles failed, other minorities
sprung up for their voice

Why Is Czar Nicholas The Great Emancipator In Animal Farm
The Czar family has been dead for almost 100 years. Nicholas and his whole family were
assassinated due to him not being well admired per say. Also, the Czar didn't have any previous
experience or training before he received his throne. Much like Czar Nicholas II, Mr. Jones was also
the leader of some things and had many similar battles and problems. Mr. Jones is the farmer in the
book Animal Farm, which was a representation of Czar Nicholas II.
Nicholas II was born on May 6, 1868 in Pashikin, Russia. His father is Alexander III, whom he
inherited his throne from, but Nicholas II was not ready. He was crowned on May 26,1894, after his
father's death, without having any experience or training to help him rule. "There was discontent in
Russia as food became scarce, soldiers became war–weary, and devastating defects demonstrated
the Czar's ineffectual leadership" (Czar Nicholas II abdicates). In addition, Nicholas' faulty actions
during the Bloody Sunday and WW1 all of Russia indicted him for their squander. Furthermore, the
citizens began to rampage and cause commotion that Nicholas had no alternative but to relinquish
his spot on the monarchy. " March 1917, the army Garrison at Petrograd joined striking workers in
demanding socialist ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Jones and Czar Nicholas II were portrayed by George Orwell very well in my opinion. Orwell used
Nicholas II to base his character Mr. Jones in an understandable, simple, modernized way. It was
very easy to connect the dots and draw comparisons. The two of them, Nicholas II and Mr. Jones,
had many similar problems and actions that were in each other's life. Some differences were there,
but not many. Mr. Jones in the book Animal Farm did not die like Nicholas. They Both lived in a
bed of roses, but surprisingly, they still had work needed to be done. Be that as it may, they failed in
doing their necessary duties which cause an uprising in their responsibilities. Consequently, both the
men were over the throne and put to

How Successfully Did Alexander Iii Suppress Opposition? Essay
sHow successfully did Alexander III suppress opposition?
Alexander III was the Tsar of Russia from 1881 to 1894 and during his reign, Russia became
somewhat stable, and Alexander himself opposed his father's reforms and stamped out any
opposition to his rule.
His father, Alexander II had allowed reformers to be present in the government. This allowed
instability and opposition at times when Russia was not in its better stages. Revolts and rebellions
has plagued Russian History and opposed the Tsars in the past. From this, Alexander III wanted to
keep reformers out of the Government in an attempt to reduce opposition and keep stability. He was
somewhat successful, there were fewer rebellions against the Tsar and stability was in order ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This meant that he had full power of Russia, and any ideas or reforms that were to be made had to
be put to him to decide upon. This meant that the opposition to his rule were ignored, and he had
full control of his country and the people in it. He hated Alexander II's idea of westernising Russia,
as he believed that this was not what the peasants would want, and believed that he held a bond with
the peasants. By this, the peasants felt like for once, someone was prepared to listen to their views
and do what was best for them, and seen as a huge percentage of Russians were peasants; this was
extremely popular and reduced the chances of a peasant revolt. Instead, Alexander wanted to
modernise Russia and turn it into a great power.
By 1881, Alexander destroyed the proposals of reform that his father had created. He forced the
reforming ministers to resign and made it very clear that his rule was one of autocracy. Met by many
with dislike, however, Alexander did crush any hope of a peaceful reform by the Russian people and
by doing so made it less likely that there would be opposition to him, as the people were unwilling
to use violence for their cause.
Alexander used a secret police force known as the Okhrama, to help him to govern Russia and give
terror to those who opposed him. Over 5000 people were exiled or sentenced to hard labour by
1894, and by this, opposition was reduced. This

What were the problems facing Alexander the III in 1881
The Problems facing Alexander III in 1881 When Alexander became Tsar, Russia was in crisis
following the assassination of Alexander II. Supreme political authority was still in the hands of the
Tsar, but there were immense challenges facing Alexander III as he suddenly became Tsar of the
world's largest country, covering a quarter of the world's land surface. Although known as the
'Russian' Empire, it compromised a large number of ethnic groups, with the Russians making up
only half the population. It was the Russians, however, who completely dominated the political and
economic system. Alexander III faced the problem of keeping this large multi ethnic empire
together. At the same time, he needed to maintain his own supreme ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Manifesto declared that absolute political power resided in the Tsar. An unbending
conservative; Pobedonostsev believed the basis of political and social stability lay in support for
autocracy, the Russian Orthodox Church and Russian nationalism. However the immediate task of
Alexander III's new government was to destroy the terror organisation, the People's Will. In the
wake of the assassination, the government introduced the Statute of State security, which set up
government–controlled courts to try governmental opponents, without the need for a jury. Those
convicted faced possible execution, and thousands were exiled to Siberia. Although these courts,
which helped maintain political stability, were only meant as a temporary measure, they stayed in
existence until the end of the Tsarist rule in 1917. The government also took action to prevent the
spread of radical, and even liberal, ideas. Press freedom was severely restricted, with fourteen major
newspapers being banned between 1882 and 1889 for displaying 'liberal' tendencies. Foreign books
and newspapers were also rigorously censored by the Okhrana (the secret police) in order to prevent
dangerous foreign ideas, such as democracy and parliamentary government, reaching the Russian
people. The universities were a particular area singled out for strict government supervision.
University fees were increased to exclude all but the

Tsar Nicholas II: The Failure Of The Romanov Regime
In Tsar Nicholas II's early rule, his main objective was to uphold the European status quo. In the
1890s they began to expand their industries and the following year the Trans–Siberian railways were
under construction. The strength of the Romanov rule was the church, army, political parties, and
the secret police. Although they supported Tsar Nicholas II, soldiers joined riots against him and
church's supported him, but did not approve of his ways. The weakness of Tsar Nicholas II
outweighs his strengths, being his incompetence of problems, economic and social, in Russia at the
time. Opposition to the Tsar because of his failure to address problems kept increasing and
inevitably led to him being overthrown.
The Tsar and Tsarina's only son,

Alexander II vs Alexander III
Compare and contrast the domestic policies of Alexander II and Alexander III Alexander II and his
successor and son, Alexander III, inherited Russia in different states and degrees of turmoil. Due to
these pressures, both were required to make alterations to the systems in place, such as that of
politics and economics. However the natures of their crisis were different and therefore the
subsequent modifications varied and were, in many cases, controversial.
Alexander II came to power in 1855 and had to deal with the humiliation Russia suffered from her
loss in the Crimean War. Due to the lacking standards within all categories, the Czar made a series
of reforms in order to better inner stability and international position. However ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This saw the emergence of the working class, which was a great push towards progress. Alexander
III employed Witte as Minister of Finance. Witte's substantial impact was that of the progression of
infrastructure. Previous to his employment, the only railway lines within Russia were that which
connected its two capital cities: Moscow and St Petersburg. However Witte recognized the
importance of having a vast and interconnecting infrastructure and pushed the building of tracks
within Russia. He multiplied the amount of track laid by twenty. This provided many opportunities
for Russia; she was able to transport people from the desolate countryside towards the city as well
as transporting goods to other nations. The increase in trade allowed for the accumulation of foreign
currency and thus granted Russia access to purchasing foreign equipment for industrialization. Both
Czars made incredible progressions for the modernization of Russia.
It is important to notice that whilst their intentions remained the same for both Alexander II and
Alexander III, that of economics and politics, their intentions festered

Alexander The Great: Alexandros III Macedonon
Alexander, commonly known as "Alexandros III Philippou Makedonon" and "Alexander the Great"
lived from 356–323 B.C. was the son of Phillip II of Macedon and Olympias. The combination of
his bravery and negotiation skills paved the way for his success and numerous victories. His
conquests and interactions with people throughout his life left a mark on the everyday world we live
in today. Alexander's first conquest was in Persia in 334 B.C. He invaded Persia with a large army
filled with dedicated men in hopes of obtaining money and restoring Greek cities that had been
dominated by the Persians. He knew his chance of victory was higher since the Persian empire was
starting to grow weak. He also wanted victory in honor of his late father who ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Surprisingly, he did not have to fight for Marathus and Aradus because the cities willing gave
themselves to be ruled under his power. While trying to conquer Tyre, he endured many barriers
which frustrated Alexander. They did not allow him on the island and the people of the islands hid
themselves from him in an act of rebellion. Alexander then built a land bridge to have access to the
island. The people revolted and tried to fight his army with fail. Alexander was victorious again in
July of 332. He raided the island violently and punished the people for not being obedient by selling
them into slavery. Alexander conquered Eygpt and was welcomed as their ruler by the Persian satrap
and people of Eygpt in November 332. He was viewed in a pharaoh–like way, and he was presented
a crown to illustrate the power he now had in the region. He spent the winter of 332–331 in Eygpt.
During that time, he discovered the city Alexandria and his supposed origins. Alexandria was
located by the Nile and grew to be a successful and well respected city. Alexander also claimed to
be the son of Zeus. He told his followers that a well–known oracle told

More Than Mere Trifles
During the Middle Ages, the English church's suggestions were spoken by God's own voice. The
Church encouraged pilgrimages to various holy places, or shrines, to search for spiritual
enlightenment and penitence from sin. This ideology says that if one were to pray at a shrine, one
could be forgiven of one's sins, thus increasing the chance of going to Heaven after an earthly death.
Those suffering from a plethora of aliments and other illnesses might also make a pilgrimage in the
hope of being healed of it. For whatever their reason, pilgrims made their way to the various
shrines; they were influenced, in part, by furthering their faith through religious relics. Pilgrims
sought out relics and saw these pieces of material as much more than ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"His wallet lay before him on his lap, / Brimful of pardons come from Rome, all hot," says Chaucer
in The Canterbury Tales. "The Pardoner's Tale" goes on to say that he even demonstrates the
audacity to sell mock relics to "poor up–country parsons," who happen to be clergymen. The
Pardoner prays on people's need for a belief in God, a heaven, atonement, forgiveness––a belief in
something, anything. The Pardoner feeds off others' insecurities and grows stronger in his
businesses practice through the mockery of religious pilgrimages. Because of the popularity of
pilgrimages, King Henry VIII made an inquiry about the nature of pilgrimages in 1535. Once Henry
read the dispositions made by his research team, the king made the decision to close over 300
monasteries across the land. Among the results of this decision was the selling of the land formerly
held by the monasteries to smaller farmers. This effect of King Henry VIII's choice made the
decision a popular one among his constituency. Shortly after Henry's curiosity about the pilgrimages
began, he focused particularly on religious shrines throughout England. Until that point, many
flocked to religious shrines for the reason of religious fulfillment. Pilgrims who were financially
well off more often than not gave expensive jewels and ornaments as recompense to the

Alexander III: The King Of Ancient Greece
Alexander III was born in Macedonia, 356 B.C. His father was King Philip and mother was Queen
Olympias. His father was the king of Ancient Greek and the king of Macedonia. Some people also
think he is son of Zeus because he was a great leader. Alexander was one of the greatest military
leader and rule the biggest empire in ancient world. When Alexander was 12, he show his courage
by tamed the wild horse Bucephalus and it became his horse. King Philip hire a philosopher Aristae
to teach him. Aristotle had taught him public speaking, science, and philosophy. He was also train as
a soldier. King Philip went to war and left him in charge of Macedonia when he was 16. Also, when
Alexander was 18 he lead a group of army that was made with male–lovers

Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper
Nicholas II, the last of the Romanov Tsars, was a man with good intentions for his country, however,
he lacked many of the crucial attributes necessary in being a proficient ruler. He was a weak and
indecisive leader; too gentle and too uneducated to take on the role of an autocrat. Moreover,
Nicholas was heavily influenced by his wife, Tsarina Alexandra, to follow in his father's footsteps
and preserve autocracy, leading to the downfall of the 304–year reign of the Romanov family. The
Tsar refused to move on with the times and his inability to rule effectively was compounded by the
burdensome events that occurred during his reign.
The initial and fundamental mistake of the Tsar was his failure to comprehend that Russia had
undergone major changes over the period of Tsarist rule.The Empire had expanded vastly, with
populations rising over 160 million, and thus, the nation's aspirations grew alongside it.
Furthermore, as quoted by Sir George Buchanan in his memoir, My mission to Russia and Other
Diplomatic Memories, Russia "...had witnessed the birth of industries, the consequent increase in ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A large crowd of unarmed demonstrators led by a priest, Father Georgy Gapon, was fired upon by
soldiers of the Imperial Guard as they marched towards the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg to
present a petition to the Tsar, regarding the exploitation of the working class and their demands for
compensation and improved conditions. Although the Tsar did not order the troops to act in this
way, as he was not in the Winter Palace at the time, this action lost the affection of the Russian
people on their Emperor and called into question the Tsarist system for the first time. The 1905
Massacre eventually provoked public outrage, and strikes soon spread throughout the industrial
centres of Russia, crippling the

Tsarina Alexandra Romanokov's Failure Of Russia
Tsarina Alexandra Romanov is accused of having a serious helping hand in the ultimate demise of
Russia and eventual revolution that occurred. While many of the Tsarina's actions did contribute to
the eventual failures in Russia, Tsarina Alexandra was dealing with much more than just the
political nature of Russia during the time of World War I. The Tsarina found herself struggling with
finding a balance between the Russian distrust due to her lineage, her struggle to produce an heir,
and finding her place with Tsar Nicholas II away at the front. In a time when the Romanov family
was the center of distrust, the German princess found herself conflicted between her strong religious
beliefs, Russian patriotism, and her desire to protect Russian aristocracy in order to provide her son
a future as Tsar. With all these conflicting allegiances in her life, Tsarina Alexandra found herself
trying to establish her role as a leader of the Russian people, a mother, and a wife while also trying
to balance her duty as a Tsarina in the scope of family and war. Tsarina Alexandra Romonov was
born in Darmstadt, Germany as Alix of Hesse and by Rhine to the second daughter of Queen
Victoria. This connection to both the Queen of England and Germany was problematic for the
Tsarina because she found herself trying to be Russian, German, and English which ultimately
produced distrust between her and the Russian people. Though the Tzar Nicholas II showed her love
and interest, the Russian society

The Abdication of Tsar Nicholas II was a Turning Point for...
To what extent was the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II the key turning point in Russia's political
development 1856–1964?
From 1856 onwards the aim of turning Russia from a once agrarian, illiterate and backwards
country and into a political superpower was set. A multitude of developments began with Nicholas
II being a catalyst of change for the Russian people. Writers of Marxist Russia such as Joan Hasler1
however believe that the Tsars abdication merely prevented revolution happening for a few years.
The significance of his abdication caused demands for a new and improved governmental structure
to be in place in order to get Russia back on its feet after the devastating defeat in world war one.
New political developments took place after the abdication of the Tsar including a new improved
Duma who quickly realised they had little trust and loyalty to the tsar and decided to take it upon
themselves to improves Russia on their own. Nearing the end of the Romanov dynasty there were 3
new political groups aiming to rule Russia, the duma, the Bolsheviks and the soviets which alone
gives us significant evidence that the Tsars reign and abdication created a significant turning point in
the political development 1856–1964.
Nicholas' abdication on March 2nd 1917 sparked the point of political change for Russia. The
majority of these changes began as a result of opposition towards his inability to reign as an
effective ruler. After his abdication his brother refused the throne

How Did Alexander III Respond To The Czars In Russia
Since 1881 the czars all over, especially Russia, were resisting change. Along with change
resistance, they kept autocratic rule. From this the czars Alexander III and Nicholas II both lead
their propel to social unrest. Alexander III came into power in 1881 from his father Alexander II. He
used very harsh measures. He did this to try and wipe out revolutionaries. For example, Alexander
III used strict private codes on public published documents even private letters, sort of like spying.
He also had secret police carefully keep an eye on both secondary schools and universities. This
made the people when they found out very confused. Teachers had to send detailed reports to the
czar about every student they taught. Then political prisoners ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
But, unfortunately there was another czar who took throne named Nicholas II. He became czar in
1894 and continued the autocratic ruling. Not only did he lead the people to social unrest but he
caused unrest in all areas. The czar was in some ways the main cause of the two revolutions. His
leadership was already weak but that didn't stop him. The people were so angry with him and his
autocratic policies that they marched to his Winter Palace in St. Petersburg. There they carried a
petition asking for better rates. Nicholas didn't care, instead he ordered his generals to fire at them.
This became known as the Bloody Sunday and the revolution of 1905. Little by little he kept falling.
But, all these bad decisions were no match to his most fatal mistake... keeping Russia in the war. He
went to the front to take person command of his army during war and to get them happier, while his
wife was leading the government. While she was in command she had no idea what she was doing
and only followed the idea of Rasputin. This was a self–described holy man that supposedly had
magical healing powers. Everything was falling apart and the people were now at total social

Alexander IIi Of King Of Ancient Greece
Alexander III of Macedon or commonly known as Alexander the Great was a King of Ancient
Greek kingdom Macedon and a member of the Argead dynasty. He spent most of his ruling years on
an extraordinary military campaign through Asia and northeast Africa and by the time he was 30 he
had created one of the largest empires of the Ancient world, stretching from Greece to Egypt and
into northwest India. Alexander is thought to be by most people as the greatest military command
that ever lived however this wasn't always the case. Many historians argue that Alexander was in
fact the opposite to what he perceived to be. This essay will essentially focus on the good and bad
side of Alexander's campaigns and through the study of various sources we will be able to
determined the real truth behind his leadership. The Persians and the Greeks had been at conflict for
hundreds of years before the time of Alexander. Ancient accounts say that Alexander was at war
with both Persia and their King Darius III and used the Persian Invasion of Greece in 5th century
BC as an excuse for his actions. Many of Alexanders greatest battles were fought against the
Persians and is where the ambitious young king began to conquer the known world. The first major
battle that he won was the Battle of the Granicus in 334 BC where he defeated a said "20,000
Persian horsemen and an equal number of foot soldiers" by Arrian. This was soon followed by
another victory at the Battle of Isus in 333 BC led by their King

Nicholas II was the Last Tsar in a long line of Russian rulers. Nicholas II's grandfather, Alexander
II, was a very liberal Tsar. During his reign, Alexander II's most notable achievements were that he
liberated the serfs, and his Emancipation Edict, which gave twenty million peasants freedom and
one third of their landlords' land. However, when Nicholas was a young boy, Alexander II was
assassinated. This made Nicholas's father, Alexander III, furious. Alexander III figured that since
Alexander II had been a liberal Tsar and was assassinated, the only way to keep control was to rule
with an iron fist. And so he did. However, Nicholas II was very meek. Would Russia fare well with
such a meek Tsar after Alexander III's harsh rule? Inept leadership ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Nicholas was pushed into invading Manchuria because people underestimated Japan's power. The
indecisive Tsar "was pushed into seizing lands in Manchuria, having been assured that little Japan
would not dare attack Russia.... He was assured that the Japanese did not know how to fight. His
ministers argued over how many Japanese soldiers it took to equal one Russian soldier–two or one
and a half." Nicholas and his government's overconfidence in their ability to defeat Japan showed
their lack of understanding of the world. Nicholas blindly followed whatever people told him
without thinking for himself. Nicholas was told that Japan was incapable of defeating Russia, but
that turned out to be false. After seizing lands in Manchuria, "Japanese forces in Manchuria defeated
the Russians in the largest land battle of the war, a bitter 12–day struggle that cost Russia 60,000
dead and wounded, 8,000 missing, and 21,000 prisoners." These tremendous losses in such a short
period of time showed Nicholas's inability to lead. The Russian people followed Nicholas into a war
that they were led to believe would be short and easy. This war cost Russia its pride, Nicholas his
people's faith, and many people their lives. The Minister of Internal Affairs pushed Nicholas into
invading Manchuria in order to keep the Russian people from revolting.

Nicholas II And Rasputin's Role In Imperial Russia During...
During World War I Nicholas II assumed supreme command of the Russian Army in September
1915. Nicholas II's personal expectation of command grew out of one of the critical weaknesses of
his reign: his own incompetence as a ruler and as an individual. In addition to his naive belief that
he shared a personal communion with the Russian people, he ruled over a political system that could
not function without his immediate presence. This fact was not merely perceived in hindsight. When
the Emperor announced his decision to his cabinet, ten of the twelve ministers of state objected and
tried to convince him to reconsider. Tellingly, ministers in Imperial Russia served only at the
pleasure of the tsar and had no responsibility to the Duma, which ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
But it was the desperate inability of Russia to mobilize its industry to a war footing, at a cost of
hundreds of thousands of casualties, that gutted the morale and ability of the army and ultimately
broke its loyalty to the throne.
Russian soldiers marched into combat in 1914–1915 blind, dismounted, and, incredibly, often
unarmed. Aerial reconnaissance, so vital given the vast distances and rapid pace of operations on the
Eastern Front, was nearly impossible. Cavalry could no longer perform this traditional function
rapidly enough. Even though Russia had 250 airplanes at the start of the war, lack of spare parts
(and frequent shootdowns by Russian troops, who believed that only Germans could use such
infernal contraptions) kept most aircraft grounded and Russian commanders

Czar Nicholas II Research Paper
Czar Nicholas II was the last tsar to rule Russia, before ending the 450 year span of the monarchy.
During the tsar's ruling they had always been disliked by Russia's citizens, however "Tsar Nicholas
II faced a situation no other tsar had faced. Tsars had ruled during unpopular wars, but never a war
as bloody as World War I." (Waldron). When czar Nicholas II decided to lead their country into war
one of the biggest issues was transporting supplies to the troops and the rest of the country.
Therefore, Russia was suffering extreme famine and began to face several defeats under the
leadership of czar Nicholas II.
When Joseph Stalin was a young adult he decided to become an active member in the Bolsheviks.
An organization started by Vladimir

Comparison Between Alexander Ii and Iii Essay
COMPARATIVE ESSAY BETWEEN ALEXANDER II AND III
Tsar Alexander II and III while father and son had very different ambitions as Tsar and different
view for the future of the empire. Alexander III succeeded to his father's throne in 1894. His reign is
looked upon by most historians as a time of repression that saw the undoing of many of the reforms
carried out by his father. Certainly that was a time of great economic and social change but these
had led, in the West of the nation, great pressure on political system. However Alexander was
deeply suspicious of the direction in which his father had taken Russia and the internal reforms that
he instituted were designed to correct what he saw as the too–liberal tendencies of his father's reign.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In fact in 1859 there were in Russia 23 millions of serfs. Alexander made up his mind to abolish it
from above before that it would be done from below, through revolution. In 1861 serfdom was
emancipated and this was the most important event in 19th century of Russian history. On the other
way Alexander III after his father's dead regarding the serfdom's reforms decided to reduce the
peasant representation in zemstva and the peasant representatives were appointed and no longer
elected. Also the "Peasant Land Bank" was created to buy land from the lords and all the children
from the lower–class were banned from secondary education. The Tsar, by a new statute in 1890,
gave to the provincial governors 'supervision over the correctness and legality of zemstvo
institutions'. The reforms of the government are connected to the abolition of the serfdom. Russia
was an under governed society, having many fewer civil servants than Britain. It was essential that
local people, therefore, filled administrative roles. In 1864 Tsar Alexander II introduced new bodies
in Russia, called zemstva. Zemstva were local governments located in outside city areas and the
people who ran them were elected by the people from the village. The Tsar gave them power for
make small reforms because he wanted to maintain his autocratic rule everywhere. The members
were chosen by three electoral colleges,

Alexander The Great : Alexander III Of Macedon
Alexander III of Macedon better known as Alexander the Great was perhaps one of the best war
generals in history. With his great decision making while managing an empire over three thousand
miles long. By defecting the Persians and Greeks he conquered Egypt and Asia Minor, and also
secured the Mediterranean Sea which we all know to be the Persian Empire. And while this empire
was under his control he remained undefeated making his empire not only grow but thrive. Over his
years of conquering his empire that covered over 3,000 miles of land he did so without the modern
technology that we have today and all at the age of 20. Alexander was a very skillful leader in battle
and showed no fear which lead his troops to follow in his footsteps. Alexander the great also known
as Alexander III of Macedon was born in Macedonia in 356 B.C.E. He was the son of Philip II, the
king of Macedon and Olympias, the daughter of King Neoptolemus. Alexander was tutored by
Aristotle at the age of 13 and was also trained with other children where he met his future best
friend Hephastion. Which lead Alexander to having a perfect Hellenic upbringing; this also
explained why he wanted to spread Hellenic culture throughout his empire and more. Alexander was
also mature at this age where he took his studies of rhetoric and literature, science, medicine, and
philosophy and all became important to him later in life. By nature Alexander was gifted in the art
of military tactics and soon gained great

Essay on comparing alexander II and alexander III
Compare and contrast the social and economic policies of Alexander II (1855–81) and Alexander III
(1881–94) of Russia.
Alexander II and Alexander III were both Tsars of Russia and they both believed in the divine will
to rule the people. However Alexander II is said to be more liberal than Alexander III though they
were both conservative in one way or the other in their social and economic policies because they
both wanted to remain with the power over the people. Alexander II was more relaxed in his polices
''Great Reformer'' and Alexander III was more strict ''great reactionary''. After the defeat in the
Crimean defeat Alexander II introduced very many reforms in Russia because he had seen how
backward Russia was and how all the other ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Alexander II gave poor ignored people more freedom while Alexander III took away their freedom.
Alexander II was more of a forgiving Tsar which made him very social when he forgave a
revolutionary group when he came to power and did not execute them while Alexander III was more
of a less forgiving Tsar as when he immediately got into power he executed Sofia and the other
revolution lists that had assassinated his father. Therefore Alexander II was a more lenient and
tolerant Tsar while Alexander III was more of a harsh and action taking Tsar.
During Alexander II reign he concentrated on exposing Russia to the outside world therefore he
built a railway line. During this period too there was some though very little reform in the
government's taxation policies which still was a heavy burden for the peasants because they still had
to pay poll tax which was increased by 80% during his reign while Alexander III abolished the poll
tax and also created the

Animal Farm: Czar Nicolas II and Farmer Jones Essay
Animal Farm: Czar Nicholas II/Farmer Jones Czar Nicholas II was the last tsar of Russia and ruled
the country during the 19th and 20th century. He was overthrown by his own people because he
lacked the leadership abilities needed to run Russia. Nicholas was the eldest son of Czar Alexander
III and Princess Dagmar of Denmark. Nicholas became Czar in 1894, after his father's sudden death,
and ruled the largest country in the world which at the time had a population of 130 million people.
From the start of his reign, people were starting to get angry at the royal family and wanted a better
government ("Nicholas"). Farmer Jones, a character from George Orwell's Animal Farm, is the
owner of Manor Farm who treats his animals very harshly. He ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
After the two dictators took over things went back to the way they were when the Czar/Jones ruled.
Napoleon/Stalin took control of Russia and famine swept the land again. They were no better rulers
than Czar Nicholas and Jones were. After he abdicated, the Czar was allowed to return to Tsarskoe
Selo to live with his wife and children in Alexander Palace (Vogt 104). As the civil war in Russia
got worse, the royal family were moved to a safer location, the Ural Mountains in Ekatrinburg
("Nicholas"). The royal family and their servants were shot on July 16, 1918 in Ekatrinburg and
their remains were burned in a forest nearby ("Czar of Russia Nicholas II"). Other members of the
royal family soon fled Russia and went to England, France, Denmark, and other parts of Europe.
Jones was not killed by the animals like Nicholas but he eventually died at the Red Lion because of
his excessive drinking, the same thing that caused him to lose control of the farm. Czar Nicholas
was a king who could not lead his people and eventually lost power because he could not lead his
country to prosperity. He cared a lot about his family but did not care as much for his country and
his people. Mr. Jones was a neglectful owner who did not take care of his animals or his farm and
was eventually forced to leave and give up his power because of his choices. Both of them could
have prevented the

Compare And Contrast Alexander III And Alexander II
In this essay I will be comparing and contrasting the different reforms implemented by both
Alexander II and Alexander III. Also looking at how it effected Russia in general
After the Crimean war Russia had suffered a devastating defeat, Alexander II decided that there had
to be change in his country in order to make Russia successful again. Alexander II was also known
as "the Liberator", this was mainly due towards his reform on emancipation towards the serfs. 40
million serfs were freed in 1861. The reason for this reform is questionable but Alexander II was
probably trying to prevent the lower classes from having a revolution.
Serfs now had the right to marry without interference and could also own land. However they did
have to pay ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However the economy surprisingly did still grow under him. The reasons for this might have been
because of the stocks and banks opened up by Alexander II.
Alexander II's reforms were great developments but was unfortunately not that effective. On the
other hand Alexander III reformed quite a lot of them. He was not a bad person for doing this but it
may be because he lacked confidence. To be a successful ruler, it is important to receive a good
education and Alexander III did not receive this. He loved his family very much and had to assure
his family and himself even though many saw him as incompetent as a tsar.
Alexander III in the end decided to reverse everything his father Alexander III brought to Russia.
Alexander II was probably not the most liberal man to ever live however he did bring some hope
which had never been present before he ruled. Alexander II had many successful reforms that helped
the nation grow politically and economically. After Alexander II's extremely brutal death his son,
possibly feared he would have a similar death and as a result changed everything to the previous
state before Alexander II came to

Nicholas II Bloody Sunday Massacre Analysis
This is a page from the diary of Nicholas II after he had been placed under house arrest by the
Bolsheviks in 1917. Nicholas II was not always hated by his people, and in fact, many Russian
citizens once saw him as a father figure in Russia. In truth, he never intended any malice toward his
people, and in his own journal he regards the "Bloody Sunday" massacre as a tragedy when he
writes, "A painful day. There have been serious disorders in St. Petersburg because workmen wanted
to come up to the Winter Palace. Troops had to open fire in several places in the city; there were
many killed and wounded. God, how painful and sad." His indifference to politics, however, is
something that is almost worse, and ultimately proved to be fatal to the

Biography Of Alexander III Of Macedon
In July 356 B. C. Alexander III of Macedon was born to Philip, King of Macedonia and wife
Olympias princess of Epirus. In his early physical education, the art of warfare. Alexander was
taught to handle the sharp, 15–foot Macedonian pike, ride a horse, and the use of a bow and javelin.
Around the age of 11 Alexander was with his father Philip when a horse breeder showed Philip a tall
stallion named Bucephalus. The trainer was unable to tame him, Philip ordered the horse to be taken
away. Alexander asked to try, where he took lead of the horse and lead him in a different direction
so that he couldn't see his shadow and spoke to the horse, keeping him quiet and calm. Then
Alexander mounted the horse and kept control of him. His father Philip ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They both taught him how to be a strong man and ruler. They sent him to the best teachers they
could find. Alexander learned to be a planner and to execute his plans, he also was taught how to be
look at the whole rather than the immediate view. He knew how to step back, so he could see the
complete picture. He could be cruel and generous. He proved his intelligence and superiority over
large and small cities. He was gifted with well–trained soldiers from his father. Which in truth,
helped his win many battles. He wasn't a King that stayed and ruled his empire. He went out to
conquer, and left trusted, loyal followers in power to maintain his empire. He changed the way we
look at government

Why Is Tsar Nicholas II A Bad Government
Bad Government – Tsar Nicholas II
The ruler of Russia in 1905 was Tsar Nicholas II. He wanted to rule his country as an absolute
Monarch. He did not want to share his power with the parliament. Russian Kings called themselves
Tsar, which means 'Emperor'. The Tsar would run on his own, assisted by a few ministers that he
chooses on his own. There was no parliament and the other people did not have any right to vote in
elections. Tsars ruled in harsh manner, ruining everyone who dared to complain.
Nicholas II was born on May 18, 1868 in Pushkin, Russia. He 'inherited' the throne from his father,
Alexander III who died in 1894 due to kidney disease at the age of 49 He was his parent's firstborn
child. Nicholas II was 19 years old when he joined

Alexander III Of Macedon's Legacy
Alexander III of Macedon, also known as Alexander the Great, was the son of King Philip And
After the death of his his father (336 BCE) he became king of Macedonia. He later went out to
conquer most of the known world of his day. He was Great because he was kind and respectful of
his followers, and left a legacy that lasted more than 9 centuries after his death, and because of the
many regions he conquered in short life time. In the Legend of the Helmet, Alexander receives a
small amount of water from his army, he dumps it on the ground because there isn't enough to go
around. As mentioned in the story of the Helmet: "Alexander, with a word of thanks for the gift,
took the helmet and in full view of his troops, poured the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
However Alexander left a great legacy that lasted Many years after his death. According to
document E: 900 years after Alexander's death, Greek literature and theater remained strong cultural
influences in the eastern Mediterranean Middle East. Centuries after Alexander had died this whole
culture remained a big influence on those societies. If he wasn't great, why would he have left a
legacy that lasted 900 years after his death? Only someone who was truly great could have left such
an impact on so many people. According to the background essay: "Flash forward three centuries. A
Roman military commander named Julius Caesar is on campaign in Spain. There he encounters a
statue of Alexander and is said to have wept. Caesar was reportedly overcome by the thought that
Alexander had achieved so much at such a young age." If Alexander didn't have an impact on all
these people, he probably wouldn't have been remembered many years after his death by people like
Caesar and the Roman emperor who 540 years after Alexander's death had him sewn into his
clothing (Document E). He probably wouldn't have statues of him still standing after his

Alexander The Great: Alexander III Of Macedonia
What makes a great leader? Throughout history, leaders around the world have been given the title
of "great." Alexander III of Macedonia was one who was called the "great". He lived from 356–323
BCE and ruled from the age of twenty until his death at the age of thirty–three. During his time as
king, he united Greece, reestablished the Corinthian League and conquered the Persian Empire. In
the wake of his father's murder, who was the king at the time, Alexander was determined to take role
of his father's throne. After his father's sudden murder, Alexander, who was 19 at the time, was
focused on ruling and taking his father's past role. He quickly got the support of the Macedonian
army, including the general and troops. The army proclaimed Alexander the feudal king and
proceeded to help him murder other potential heirs to the throne. Alexander understood what was at
stake and took action immediately. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In fact, the southern states of Greece were celebrating his father's death and showed divided
interests. Athens had it's own plan in hoping to take charge of the league. As the states started
independent movements, Alexander sent his army south and persuade the region of Thessaly into
accepting him as the leader of the Corinthian League. Then during a meeting of league members at
Thermopylae, Alexander drew out their acceptance of his leadership. He soon received treaties with
the Greek city–states that belonged to the Corinthian League, except Athens. This led to the war of
Sparta and

Alexander III Of Macedon
lexander III of Macedon, more commonly known as Alexander the Great, was the leader of the
Kingdom of Macedonia from when he was eighteen to the time of his death. He was known as a
military and political leader, and was so effective in these roles that after his death he acquired a
reputation as a legendary being. In this essay I will be briefly summarizing and discussing his early
years before taking the throne, his first military actions as king, some military exploits in Persia, and
his advances into India. Alexander was born in 356BCE to king Phillip II and Olympias, a princess
from Epirus, in Pella, the capitol of Macedonia. His earliest feat was the taming of the stallion
Bucephalus when he was twelve years old. He went on to study ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In spring of 326BCE, he crossed the Indus and entered the city of Taxila, whose ruler exchanged
military forces for help against his rival Porus (Walbank). In June of the same year Alexander fought
his last great battle, the Battle of the Hydaspes, which he won. After this victory he founded two
cities, Alexandria Nicaea and Bucephala, and made Porus his ally (Walbank). After this victory
Alexander wished to press on into India, but his army mutinied, and Alexander agreed to turn back
(Walbank). Alexander succumbed to illness on June thirteenth, 323BCE (Walbank). Alexander the
great was born to be a conqueror. Not only well educated, he was leading military forces
successfully from as early as sixteen. After his ascension to the throne, he continued on his fathers
plans for invasions, and conquered almost the whole known world. Alexander the Great surely
deserves to be called such, as his exploits will be remembered and his legend will continue to grow,
for many more years to

The Romsnovs: The Final Chapter
In the biography,The Romanovs: The Final Chapter, Robert K. Massie delves on what might have
truly happened to the Romanov family. A large portion of the book goes into extensive detail on the
uncovering of the grave and authentication of bones belonging to the Romanovs. Another large
section is dedicated to discrediting many impostors that arose in the time after their deaths such as
solving the mystery of Anna Anderson, a woman who claimed to be the missing Grand Duchess
Anastasia Nicholaevna. In the biography, Massie would recount all of this and how the death of the
Romanovs would baffle countries across the globe into trying to uncover the secrets of their deaths
and how it would forever change Russia's view on government. From what Massie describes in The
Final Chapter it only really gives a small glimpse of what happened before the Romanovs were
executed. Russia was suffering under Nicholas's rule. When Nicholas was crowned in 1896 he
wanted to preserve the absolute monarchy but the Russian people wanted change. Over the course
of his rule he would go back on his word numerous times which would favor his rivals, The
Bolsheviks. Russia would fight unprepared in WW1. The military and resources would suffer great
losses. All of this would lead the Russian people to lose faith in their Tsar. In 1914, the February
Revolution would begin and after much rebellion Nicholas abdicated the throne in 1917. The
November Revolution commanded by leader of the Bolsheviks, Vladimir

The Downfall Of The Romanov Dynasty
In a burgeoning climate of autocracy, the Romanov dynasty was firmly established in the societal
framework of early 20th–century Russia. Having been in varying degrees of absolute political
control over an approximate time period of four hundred years, their eventual undoing marked a
power shift polarising the imperial regime laid out by countless Tsars beforehand. Nicholas II, the
last Emperor of Russia, is recognised to have a degree of personal responsibility for the downfall of
the Romanovs, yet the extent to which his decision–making skills can be held accountable is
questioned by some historians. Despite this, multiple political, social, and military facets of
Nicholas II's reign were handled with instability, and his perceived lack of legitimacy due to this
poor decision–making ultimately was a major causative factor to the downfall of his family's vast
dynasty.
Various aspects of Nicholas II's political decisions reflected his clear unsuitability for the role of
Tsar, and these decisions form a preliminary basis for both his own legacy of incompetency & the
eventual undoing of the Romanovs. In comparison to rulers preceding, Nicholas was ill–prepared
for the role: his father, Alexander III, failed to adequately develop his son's understanding of civil &
state responsibilities before his death in 1894, under the guise that he would live long enough to
teach Nicholas of these affairs. Upon his consecration as Tsar, Nicholas spoke in his diary of his
apprehensiveness

How Did Alexander Iii Reverse the Reforms of Alexander Ii?
Improvements in green
To what extent did Alexander III reverse the reforms of his predecessor Alexander II?
In many respects, there is no doubt that Alexander III was the most effective Tsar in such the short
reign that he had. He was referred to as a reactionary, unlike his father Alexander II who was known
as a reformer. He managed to please the people with his Russian figure and attitude, he changed
their attitude and he made tsarism look all the better, all in a short period of time. Despite their
different policies, they had the same goals/ambitions inside their head in the long run, and that was
to strengthen Autocracy in the Russian empire but Alexander III did this by reversing what his father
had done as he felt he knew ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When he came into power (Probably also with the help and guidance of Pobedonostev) he got rid of
and restricted a lot of power that the zemstva had. He kept them so it made the people think that
they had some form of power and influence but they didn't really have that influence they thought
they had. He knew that this was kind of working because the people didn't coplain as much, they
knew that they had the opportunity to do something about it and so decided that they were happy
with what they had as it was a giant leap up from nothing anyway. He made Land Captains (as they
were known) the most important members of each zemstva area and these people had the most
power and say as they reported directly to the minister of the interior. They made sure that nothing
went over the top or in any way threatened the Tsar. This is proof that the Zemstva lost power to
what Alexander II had gave them so that the Tsar was stronger all due to Alexander III reversing the
reform, to a reasonable extent.
In 1870, Alexander made the reform of having trials that weren't that bias and allowed Trail by Jury.
This made the system fairer and meant that the people wouldn't complain as much because the jurys
consisted or your 'ordinary'' Russians. This meant that every trial was fair and easier to make a
judgment on because you didn't have conservative people making the judgment or people that were
bias towards the tsar. This was to please the people however Alexander II

Tsar Nicholas II was one of the central figures to the Russian February Revolution of 1917 and
secured the downfall of the Romanov dynasty. Nicholas II continued the regressive reforms of his
father Tsar Alexander III, ultimately disenchanting the constituents from the neglect of longstanding
grievances; he epitomised the fundamental problem of absolute rule, as years of suffering would
eventually lead to revolution. His mismanagement and direct involvement in World War I
undermined the already unstable government, causing his subjects to join radical movements to
overthrow the tsarist regime. The accumulation of the repressive and ineffective government
policies throughout the reign of autocratic Tsar Nicholas II sparked public discontent,

Alexander IIi Of Macedonia Truly Worthy Of The Title Essay
Was Alexander III of Macedonia really worthy of the title ""Great" or was he just a megalomaniac
conditioned into this belief by his followers? Well, if you consider his military legacy which is
almost as large as the swath of territory he conquered spanning from modern day Greece to northern
India, or the fact that his over 2,000 year old combat tactics are still being taught at military
academies the world over, I don't believe the word "great" would be too far from imagination. When
Alexander rose to power following the death of his father, Phillip II, his kingdom of Macedonia
encompassed all of the land that we know as modern Greece. For Alexander this was not enough.
Phillip II is believed to have prophesized s his son's ambitions with the words, "My son you must
find a kingdom big enough for your ambition. Macedon is too small for you." after Alexander tamed
his wild buck Bucephalas at age 10. Born around July 20th, 356 BC to King Phillip II and one of his
favorite wives, Olympias, Alexander was believed to be destined for greatness from the start. Many
tall tales about his birth origin circulated throughout and after his life including his personal claim of
descent from Achilles and Zeus. After enjoying a leisurely life as the child of a noble family, he
began his tutelage under Aristotle at the age of 13. His father, Phillip II was frequently absent from
Macedonia on long conquest campaigns that eventually unified most of the Greek cities under his
rule. In his

Alexander IIi : The Great
Macedonian king Alexander III known as Alexander "the Great", reigned during the years 336 to
323 b.c.e. In the course of his reign, he and his forces skillfully acquired a number of city–states for
his empire through both siege and of their own surrender. Prior to Alexander taking the throne, his
father Philip II was king of Macedonia, which as the time was possible predominantly pastoral and
rural. In addition, the Macedonians experienced numerous invasions from surrounding neighbors
including Epirotes, Illyrians and Thracians and the poleis (southern Greek city–states). Both King
Philip II and his son Alexander the Great attributed to define civilization by growing their empire
and expanding culture for Macedonians.
Philip II defined civilization by bringing pastoral workers into the city and creating a mightier
Macedonian force. Alexander's father Philip II was made king after the killing of his brother,
Perdiccas III, which was a direct result of an invasion by the Illyrians in the year 359 b.c.e. In a
speech he gave to his own troop's years after the death of Philip II, Alexander spoke of his father
accomplishments as a ruler. At the time of this speech he had returned home with his troops after
they insisted on returning to Macedonia from an expedition to India. Frustrated, with turning back
from India, he reminded his troops where they came from. Namely he reminded them of his father's
aid in bringing them up from pastoral plains where they lived in fear of

Alexander The King's Impact Of Alexander III The Macedon
Alexander III the Macedon, known as Alexander the Great ruler (21 July 356 BCE – 10 or 11 June
323 BCE),he was the child of King Philip II of Macedon. He end up being lord upon after his dad's
demise in 336 BCE and went ahead to vanquish the vast majority of the known universe of his day.
He is known as 'the immense' both for his military brightness and his discretionary abilities in
dealing with the different overall public of the areas he prevailed At the point when Alexander was
youthful, he was prepared to battle and ride by Leonidas of Epirus, a relative of his mom Olympias,
and to manage hardships, for example, constrained walks. His dad, Philip, was keen on developing a
refined future lord so employed Lysimachus of Acarnania to educate ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He called himself the child of Zeus, thus guaranteed the status of a demi–god, connecting his blood–
line to his two most loved legends of classical times, Achilles and Herakles, and displaying his
conduct after theirs. This faith in his heavenliness was imparted in him by Olympias who
additionally disclosed to him that his was a virgin birth as she had been inexplicably soaked by Zeus
himself. His introduction to the world was related with awesome signs and ponders, for example, a
brilliant star cleaned over Macedonia that night and the pulverization of the Temple of Artemis at

Analysis Of Alexander IIi The Great King Of Macedonia And...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Analysis Of Alexander IIi The Great King Of Macedonia And...