Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101 - Basics on Growth Marketing
LG Marketing Case Study
1. LG ELECTRONICS INC: NORTH
AMERICAN WASHING MACHINE
MARKET
GROUP D7
AISHWARYA USGAONKAR
ALANKRITA MISHRA
ANKIT SEN
JOSHUA DESOUZA
SHUBHAM GHOSH
SHOBHINI RAI
2. • Entered the
North American
market with a
front-load
model TROMM
(carried ENERGY
STAR label)
(2002)
• Launched LG
Brand (renamed
in 1995 from
Goldstar) in
North America
in 2002
• Business Strategy as
described by
LGE:“fast innovation,
fast growth”
• Four values
underlying LG brand
identity: Trust,
Innovation, People &
Passion
• Immediate challenges
faced:
• American
consumer
perception of
foreign brands
• Meeting
expectations of
American
consumers of fit,
feel and finish
• Building a brand
4. MAJOR ISSUES
• Finalizing Washing Machine’s Design (Front load/Top load,
Transparent door/Opaque Door, Front/Top/Rear Control Panel
etc.)
• Introducing a single model (catering to single segment) or more
than one model (catering to different segments)
• Introducing one of the two new technological concepts:
Washer-Dryer Combination or Steam Technology
• Pricing and Marketing of the new model
• Budget allocation to marketing communication
5. Based on the product, we aim to Segment, Target and Position the product,
• Environment Conscious (22%)
• Fashion Conscious (29%)
• Homemakers (20%)
• Convenience & Budget Conscious (24%)
SEGMENTATION
•Environment Conscious – ensured increased energy and water efficiency
•Fashion Conscious – premium, front-loading, transparent door design, stainless steel
body providing high aesthetic value.
•Homemaker- preferred cleanliness, large capacity & ease of loading and unloading
TARGETING
• Highly efficient product from a premium brand incorporating a
patented and sophisticated steam technology.
• High aesthetic value along with high performance
POSITIONING
6. MARKETING MIX
Product Design (One
Model):
• Capacity: 3.8 cu ft.
• Speed: 1200 rpm
• Stainless Steel
• Top Control Panel (LED)
• Noise: Around 60 dB
• Technology: Steam &
Washer Dryer
Combination
Retail Channels:
• Best Buy
• Home Depot
• Sears
• Regional retailers like
P.C. Richards, hhgregg
etc.
Pricing of the Model:
• Willingness to Pay ~$1421.
With the patented steam
technology price would be
around $1400.
• Added advantages for
consumers (due to ENERGY
STAR label)
• Rebate of around $100
would add to the margins
of the manufacturer
• Training sales force (to
change consumer
perception & build brand
value)
• In retail outlets with no
salesmen, display the
product where it is clearly
visible.
• Providing discounts and
specific advertising,
especially, in festive
seasons.
• Sponsorships and
promotional events.
7. BEST
PRACTICES
• Understanding Consumer behaviour by conducting Market Research
• Aligning with the goals of the company (Strategic Fit)
• Consistent and continuous developments in R&D and launching new
products every two years keeping in line with the company’s business
strategy, “Fast Innovation, Fast Growth.”
• Through market research, LG could effectively segment the
consumers and position their brand as a ‘premium’ category thereby
gaining a 10.8% market share within 3 years.
• Product adaptation suiting the needs of the American consumers
(especially with TROMM in 2002).
• Forward Invention through the launch of innovative products with
new technology.
8. REFERENCE
S
• LG Electronics Inc.: Making waves in the North American washing machine
market; INSEAD Case Study, Lajos J., Chattopadhyay A., 2007.
• http://www.lg.com/ae/images/washing-
machines/f1252rd7/gallery/medium01.jpg
• http://www.lg.com/nz/images/washing-machines/wd14070sd6/gallery/copy-
medium01.jpg
• http://www.clipartkid.com/images/613/how-to-ensure-your-washing-
machine-smells-as-fresh-as-the-day-it-was-XQ1LNv-clipart.jpg
• http://www.conversationalmarketinglabs.com/wp-
content/uploads/2012/09/cartoon-lifting.jpg
• http://www.daniellopezdo.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Cartoon-Man-
Trying-To-Lift-Weights.jpg
• https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/29/North_America_satelli
9.
10. ANNEXURE -1
Projected Market Share Growth in Washing Machine (in 000’s)
Machine 2002 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Market Share in 2010
Front
Loading
Machines
1379 2438 2948 3565 4310 5212 6302
49%CAGR 21%
Top
Loading
Machines
6386 6494 6530 6567 6604 6641 6678
51%CAGR 1%
Total 7765 8932 9478 10132 10914 11853 12980
Editor's Notes
Based at Seoul, South Korea, LG was a part of Lucky Goldstar conglomerate. Founded in 1958, Goldstar Corporation Ltd. Always prided themselves as “Korea’s first”. By 1982, they decided to venture into American electronics market and by 1982, they had set up manufacturing plant and US’s headquarters by 1989.
LGE business strategy was “fast innovation, fast growth” and core values included Trust, Innovation, People & Passion. LGE also focussed on faster innovation and had heavily invested in RnD. This enabled them to have faster cycle times and introduce a new and innovative product every 2 years.
By 2002, LGE decided to enter the North American washing machine market. North American washing machine market was already filled with major players like Kenmore, Maytag, Whirlpool and various minor players. Although the existing market volume was majorly dominated by the cheaper, top loading machines; this trend was gradually changing. There was a growth of around 21.3% annually in the demand for front-load machines in 2005.
LGE, driven by its goals of introducing innovative product and gain market share in the premium category, launched a front-load model named TROMM in 2002. There were several advantages of the product like low power consumption, low water consumption and less noisy (due to incorporation of a patented direct-drive technology).
TROMM was a European style, controls on the front face model which basically tried to position LG Brand as sophisticated and premium. This was because, consumers in US perceived Asian brands as low in quality and efficiency. LGE aimed at changing the consumer perception through this move. They also launched different models of the brand at different prices to offer a variety in fit, feel and finish of the product.
As a new entrant in the market, faced several challenges:
Demands of American consumers in terms of aesthetics and build of the product
Building a brand as a premium category brand
Entry of European competition in 2003
By 2005, however, LGE’s market share LGE had increased to 10.8%.
Strengths
Innovation and Design
The R&D team comprised of a cross function team that contributed to the design
Additionally increased focus of R&D through the development of R&D centers in the USA
Forward Invention
The development of the steam technology which was new to the market and patenting the same
Product Adaptation
While entering into the USA markets, LGE adapted the product to ensure consumer satisfaction. Through the introduction of a front loading machine called ‘Tromm’ and aligning it to the consumer perception of European technology being superior.
Consistently successful in introducing a new washing machine every two years
LGE consistently introduced a new machine once every two years and successfully captured increased market share in the front loading machine industry.
Weakness
Lack of trained salesmen
The agreement with Best Buy for the retail of the LGE machines. Best Buy as an organization possessed sales personnel with low skills and training.
In addition with the agreement with Home Depot did not have any sales personnel to provide any product information to the prospective customers
Absence of product in Sears
Sears largely catered to the targeted consumers (premium segment) of LGE. LGE, trying to shift to a premium brand should have aimed to have presence in Sears. However its inability to have presence in Sears was a source of concern.
Opportunities
Targeting high growth segment
LGE, present in the front loading machine category is growing at a CAGR of 21% from 2002 to 2005 while the top loading category had grown at 1% in the same period. LGE’s presence in this high growth category would enable it to receive higher market share.
New technology
With the introduction of the Steam technology which LGE had patented could revolutionize the washing machine industry. This in turn would result in LGE increasing sales as well as improving the brand image.
Threats
High level of competition in the front loading machine category
Presence of large number of competitors including American companies (GE), European companies (Bosch) and Asian companies (Samsung) in the space.
Acceptance of Steam Technology
Based on the consumer perception, steam technology had quite a few negative aspects such as potential safety hazards and acceptance by older generation consumers.
Major Issues that the North American Product Planning (NAPP) faced:
Finalizing the design of the washing machine:
Front load/Top Load machine: Decision has to be taken whether to design a front loading model, keeping in mind the company’s primary goal of maintaining a premium brand image, or cater to the low priced segment of top loading. (low priced segment, i.e. top loading models were priced only at $299 compared to front loading model were priced around $999 and above)
Transparent/Opaque doors: If going along with front load machines, decision has to be taken on whether to go ahead with transparent/opaque doors based on the consumer preferences (referring to the results of the qualitative and quantitative studies conducted on the study group)
Front/Top/Rear Control Panel: This decision has to be made after weighing the advantages and disadvantages of the position of the control panel like ease of accessibility, reach of children, complexity of the panel etc.
Other factors such as Capacity, RPM, LCD/LED panel must be decided to suit and satisfy consumers’ needs.
Based on the consumer feedback, they have to decide whether to go ahead with a single model catering to one specific segment or multiple models for different segments.
LGE had perfected and patented the Steam technology by 2005. However, consumer knowledge about the technology was limited and many consumers doubted its safety and efficiency. The other technology that LGE wanted to introduce was a washer-dryer combination in a single machine. There were certain disadvantages cited by the consumers such as decreased capacity of the combination compared to a single unit of the washing machine.
LGE’s two primary goals were: Introduce innovative products & become one of the world’s top three electronic firms in the next three years. Keeping in mind the positioning of the brand as a premium category, pricing of the models is important and decision has to be taken how to price the model to be introduced to match the market standards and prices of the competitors. Additionally, since the technology introduced by LGE is going to be a new one, marketing of the product would be imperative to position themselves as the premium category.
Another decision was to effectively allocate $40 million for marketing communication
Segmentation:
Based on the market research conducted by LGE, four different segments were identified:
The environment conscious whose major preferences were conserving water and energy.
The fashion conscious who were young, educated and well-to-do. They valued style and aesthetics of the product (fit, feel and finish) and considered themselves as trend setters.
The homemaker segment who were more inclined towards the well-being of the family and were ambitious. Although slightly price-sensitive, they were ready to spend on quality product. Moreover, they were more concerned about the cleaning ability of the machine, safety, ease of operation and capacity.
The convenience and budget conscious were the group which were more tech-savvy but were highly price-sensitive.
Targeting
Environment conscious – Through the introduction a patented steam technology which is more energy efficient and lower water consumption, LG should target this segment with the benefits of the same.
Fashion Conscious – LGE’s aesthetic design of the machine would cater to their requirements of a premium product with a good fit feel finish. This would be achieved with the design structure and the features of the washing machine.
Homemaker – LG should target this segment as it has incorporated features such as high capacity and good performance that would cater to the requirements of this segment.
Positioning
LGE always focussed on building a premium brand value among the consumers. In the American market, Asian brands did not appeal well to the consumers, being often perceived as having low quality and efficiency. Through marketing innovative and premium products, LGE aimed at changing the consumer perception about the brand and build brand value.
The Marketing Mix criteria for the model to be introduced would be:
Product: Since LGE strongly believes in maintaining its reputation of introducing a new and innovative product every two years, product design of the new Washing Machine (One flagship model to be introduced) could be as follows:
Capacity: 3.8 cu ft. would be within the existing market range
Speed: 1200 rpm (at par with market range). Additional benefits would be energy efficiency of the machine and higher rpm than the mean rpm speed of the competitors.
Body: Stainless steel to maintain a premium image
Control panel: A top panel could be preferred, as LGE Market research had revealed that consumers liked the top panel better than a front one. Also it would appeal to the consumers concerned about children tampering with the panel when placed in the front.
Noise: LG had incorporated a patented direct drive technology which was 20% less noisy, due to lesser vibration. This were added advantages as noise levels was around 60 dB, which was lesser compared to most competitors (Except Bosch, which was same as that of LG) who used belt-drive technology. Also the technology was less power consuming.
Technology: With a patented technology, we feel LG should go ahead with a model which incorporates the Steam Technology. This is also in line with the primary goals of the company as being innovative in its new products.
Price: According to our calculations (Refer to Exhibit 17), for the model having a superior and efficient technology as the steam technology, price of the model should be kept around $1400. This is in line with the ‘willingness to pay’ of the consumers (~$1421, inferred from adding the cost of steam generator and including costs of other features such as 3.8 cu ft., 1200 rpm and stainless steel body). Additionally, LGE products come with a ENERGY STAR label on it, which would enable consumers of certain geographic areas to avail discounts on their utility bills. From a seller’s perspective $100 rebate can be obtained from the government per unit sold. Also since, LGE had manufacturing unit located in Mexico, cost of transportation would be significantly reduced.
Place: Having already partnered with Best Buy, Home Depot and regional retailers like P.C. Richards and hhgregg etc, LGE should now plan to partner with Sears. The reason for this move is that Sears is the largest appliance retailer in North America and caters to our target customers (i.e. mid to high). The reason for not choosing to partner with Lowe’s was a slow growth rate and not catering to LGE’s target customers.
Promotion: Keeping in mind LGE’s strong goals in achieving a premium brand value, the promotional strategies should be:
Training the sales force in the retail outlets about the benefits, efficiency and safety of steam technology. Consumers had misconceptions about the safety of the same and training the salesmen who would be in direct contact with the customers is the first step to bring about that change.
In outlets such as Home Depot, where were no salesmen, proper display of the product so that it appeals to the customers should be done in order to promote the new product.
Another promotional move would be to provide an additional discounts to the customers, especially in the festive seasons. Also, advertisements could be aimed at specific festive occasions such as Christmas, Halloween, New Year etc. (Incorporating their core values into their advertisements).
LG could also promote their brand through sponsorships of soaps and primetime TV shows. It could also conduct promotional events for its products and aim to establish a better brand value through these events.
With regards to the budget allocation of $40 million, we will not be able to comment on its allocation due to insufficient information relating to the costs of various promotion related activities, e.g. advertisements, brochures, training of sales staff etc.