Page 1 of 3 Compensation and Benefits ©2009 Argosy University Online Programs MicroPharm BioSciences Introduction MicroPharm BioSciences (MPBS) is a small organization that grew rapidly. Not much attention was paid to administrative and management aspects, and human resource management was not a priority. As a result, haphazard and inconsistent practices developed. The organization has now concluded they need to implement a compensation plan to support continued growth and business strategy. Your consultancy firm, ABC consulting, has been called in to help do that. You are leading the ABC project team working on the MPBS account and are responsible for analysis of MPBS HR matters leading to a centralized set of policies relating to total compensation and benefits programs. Your team will consider relevant benchmarking research as it works to overhaul and provide a more centralized set of policies relating to total compensation and benefits programs in key areas, including job evaluation, external competiveness, individual pay guidelines, pay-for-performance programs, and communication guidelines. Dr. Rodriquez has suggested you work with the general manager as a point of contact. In preparation for your meeting, you and your team have reviewed information available at the company’s Web site. Your team has completed the preliminary review of the organization, including discussions with management, and compiled initial information about MPBS. Preliminary Team Report Senior management recognizes that HR policies have evolved somewhat inconsistently within each of the four separate divisions and aims to centralize policies. The organization is seeking to focus on developing a more formalized approach to compensation and benefits policies. Historically, the organization has always recognized the accomplishments of its scientific staff, while perhaps understating the integral role that administrative, business, and technical support staff have played in the organization’s growth and revenue generation. The company’s Web page and internal documents highlight and profile the “deep scientific expertise” in the organization, but internal or external communications do not place equal emphasis on the contributions of nonscientific personnel. Five years ago, the company employed only a third of the current staff. Even at that time, signs of HR problems were surfacing, including ethical issues, potential inconsistencies in supervisory and management treatment of employees, and problems with internal and external alignment of the pay system. In 2003, an external consultant suggested a comprehensive job evaluation and an extensive salary analysis with likely adjustments across the board including implementation of additional incentives beyond scientific staff. Top management dismissed the recommendation openly stating that nonscientific staff did not contribute to the bottom line. The company did not attem.

1. Page 1 of 3
Compensation and Benefits
©2009 Argosy University Online Programs
MicroPharm BioSciences
Introduction
MicroPharm BioSciences (MPBS) is a small organization that
grew rapidly. Not much attention was paid to
administrative and management aspects, and human resource
management was not a priority. As a result,
haphazard and inconsistent practices developed. The
organization has now concluded they need to
implement a compensation plan to support continued growth and
business strategy. Your consultancy firm,
ABC consulting, has been called in to help do that.
You are leading the ABC project team working on the MPBS
account and are responsible for analysis of
MPBS HR matters leading to a centralized set of policies
relating to total compensation and benefits
programs. Your team will consider relevant benchmarking
research as it works to overhaul and provide a
more centralized set of policies relating to total compensation
and benefits programs in key areas, including

2. job evaluation, external competiveness, individual pay
guidelines, pay-for-performance programs, and
communication guidelines.
Dr. Rodriquez has suggested you work with the general manager
as a point of contact. In preparation for
your meeting, you and your team have reviewed information
available at the company’s Web site. Your
team has completed the preliminary review of the organization,
including discussions with management,
and compiled initial information about MPBS.
Preliminary Team Report
Senior management recognizes that HR policies have evolved
somewhat inconsistently within each of the
four separate divisions and aims to centralize policies. The
organization is seeking to focus on developing a
more formalized approach to compensation and benefits
policies. Historically, the organization has always
recognized the accomplishments of its scientific staff, while
perhaps understating the integral role that
administrative, business, and technical support staff have played
in the organization’s growth and revenue
generation.
The company’s Web page and internal documents highlight and
profile the “deep scientific expertise” in the
organization, but internal or external communications do not
place equal emphasis on the contributions of
nonscientific personnel.
Five years ago, the company employed only a third of the
current staff. Even at that time, signs of HR
problems were surfacing, including ethical issues, potential
inconsistencies in supervisory and management

3. treatment of employees, and problems with internal and external
alignment of the pay system.
In 2003, an external consultant suggested a comprehensive job
evaluation and an extensive salary analysis
with likely adjustments across the board including
implementation of additional incentives beyond scientific
staff. Top management dismissed the recommendation openly
stating that nonscientific staff did not
contribute to the bottom line. The company did not attempt to
extend any incentives to nonscientific staff.
The consultant had also suggested a routine equal employment
opportunity (EEO) audit to proactively
explore potential concerns before any further growth in
headcount. Top management dismissed all
recommendations out of hand suggesting that supervisors did
not have time for HR issues which would
take from the time spent in revenue generating activities.
Over the past five years, employees have openly expressed
concerns about their benefits being inadequate
and a desire to have a benefit package reflecting more up-to-
date policies as covered in the popular press
and in top organizations that focus on the quality of work/life
initiatives. The organization does not have a
flexible benefits program and offers only one medical plan with
two options, single or family coverage. Over
half of the staff are under the age of 35 and do not require
family medical coverage. Ten percent of the
scientific staff hold H1-B visas and would like to apply for U.S.
citizenship. A significant percentage of staff
in support functions have been with the organization since its
inception. This staff has an average age of
42.

4. Page 2 of 3
Compensation and Benefits
©2009 Argosy University Online Programs
2
Module 1
MicroPharm BioSciences
Salaries are often inconsistent across divisions and even within
project teams in a single division.
Inconsistencies resulted from supervisors having discretion for
hiring and pay increases for their direct
reports, without consultation or approval from HR. Eventually
these inconsistencies became clear to the HR
team and even to the payroll staff. The HR manager
recommended that management focus on consistency
and ensure that performance evaluations were timely and tied to
the annual pay adjustment cycle. The
general manager ignored HR recommendations. Half of the staff
had not had a performance evaluation in
over two years. During the same time, the headcount had
increased by 50 percent.
Last year, the HR department was overhauled and a new, more
highly placed, and more experienced
senior HR manager was hired. Senior management had
recognized that, with growth, it was time to give
attention to “business and management” issues, and so this
aspect of the organization received as much
recognition as the scientific accomplishments.
Here is the information found at the MPBS Web site:

5. Our History
MicroPharm BioSciences (MPBS) was founded in 1991 by Dr.
Maria Rodriquez, a world-renowned
biochemist in the field of liquid chromatography/mass
spectrometry. Dr. Rodriquez was affiliated with
Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois.
Dr. Rodriquez’s early vision was to build an organization that
would provide cutting-edge research services
to the pharmaceutical industry. The organization has become
well-known for its deep scientific expertise.
As the pioneer in this evolving and fast-changing industry,
MPBS grew quickly and currently employs nearly
200 professionals in three separate business divisions serving
related but diverse clients beyond the
biosciences. MPBS has a mix of clients across four continents,
including many of the major pharmaceutical
organizations, government and privately funded organizations,
and academic research groups.
Location
MPBS operates in three locations within the United States:
Northern Illinois, Southeastern Pennsylvania,
and North Carolina. We have 200 employees and almost all of
them are located in the U.S.
Sales and support staff are located in all three U.S. locations
and in England, Germany, Israel, and Japan.
Our company has grown rapidly through diversification and
acquisition to have four divisions:
administrative, scientific, business, and technical.

6. We trace our roots to the two divisions—scientific and
business—that reflect Dr. Rodriquez’s early vision to
serve the pharmaceutical industry.
News
MicroPharm BioSciences (MPBS) recently acquired
NanoPharm, producer of nanotechnologies in the field
of bioscience. The new division, located in Virginia, has
brought in an additional 75 employees and is
expected to raise annual revenues by 15 percent of current
levels. After the acquisition of NanoPharm,
MPBS opened satellite offices in Seattle serving clients in Asia.
Products
MPBS continues to expand its diverse product lines and is fast
becoming a recognized leader in cutting-
edge microfluidic and nanochemical products across many
industries.
Mission and Values
Our Mission
We are the recognized pioneers in bioanalytical services for the
life-science industry and continue to
innovate and excel in the field.
Our Values
To lead the way in research and innovation, driving the quest
for new technologies

7. Page 3 of 3
Compensation and Benefits
©2009 Argosy University Online Programs
3
Module 1
MicroPharm BioSciences
To anticipate and satisfy customers’ changing needs while
achieving goals and adhering to core
values
To have a structure devoid of hierarchy
To have a managerial style that is adaptive and anticipatory of
changes while supporting ethical
choices
To invest in employees’ continual development, empowerment,
and growth
Careers
MPBS aims to be at the forefront of bioanalytical innovation.
Our employees are our key asset and we aim
to recruit individuals with experience, a body of knowledge, and
the ability to propel growth and new ideas.
We believe in a learning culture that fosters development and
growth.
If you are interested in joining us, please review our current
openings and submit a resume and cover letter

8. through our careers page.
MPBS is an equal opportunity employer.
Bugusa, Inc. Worksheet
LAW/421 Version 2
1
University of Phoenix Material
BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet
Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the
student website to answer the following questions.
Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement
Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain.
Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet)
Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain.
Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter)
Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s
actions.
Scenario: BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot
What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your
answer.
Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. (Randy and Brian)

9. What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your
answer.
Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. (Sally)
Sally may have a successful case against BUGusa, Inc., for what
torts? Explain your answer.
Case Scenarios: BUGusa, Inc.
Use the BUGusa, Inc., scenarios and your research to support
your answers to the questions listed in the worksheet,
classifying the types of torts in each scenario.
Submit the completed worksheet
Please fill the work sheet
https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/secure/aapd/SB/LAW421/Case%20
Scenarios_%20BUGusa,%20Inc.%20-
%20Engage%20output/engage.html
Article Review Format Guide
LAW/421 Version 2
1
University of Phoenix Material
Article Review Format Guide
MEMORANDUM
UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX
DATE:

10. TO: (Facilitator Name)
FROM: (Student Name)
RE: (Article Name and Citation)
ARTICLE SYNOPSIS
In your own words, summarize the article.
LEGAL ISSUE
In 1 to 3 sentences, identify the legal business issues raised in
the article.
MANAGERIAL PERSPECTIVE
Discuss how the legal issues affect business. For example, could
the problems have been avoided? Explain. Discuss realistic
solutions supported by sound legal and business principles.
weekly reflection please assist
Discuss the, “Legal Issues in Cyberspace” excerpt in Section
24-5 of Ch. 24, and Section 24-6, “Copyright Infringement,” of
the text. Discuss the topics you are comfortable with, the topics
you struggled with, and how these issues relate to application in
your field.
Write a 350- to 700-word paper detailing the findings of your
discussio