SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
Download to read offline
Mercuri Urval
    How our Company can help yours




“   It’s all about people™
Our Company
Wherever you need us, we are there




• Founded in 1967                            • More than 3.000 clients in all sectors

• Independent. Organically grown             • Small, medium and large organisations

• Operating in over 50 countries worldwide   • Local, national and global partnerships

• 800 professionals in 75 offices            • Over 10.000 assignments every year
Our approach
       The right people will deliver the right results




“   Achieving tomorrows results is about aligning people with new strategies
How can we help?
        Securing the right talent, in the right place at the right time




“   We are pioneers in predicting the impact people will have on results
What we do
       Strengthening you people performance




“   We are a result focused international people consultancy
What we do
Service in detail
Optional supporting slides
Who we do it for
Helping the best be even better

                                  T-Systems
ROI Basic Method

Level                  Measurement Focus

1. Reaction,           Measures participant satisfaction and captures planned
   Satisfaction, and   actions.
   Planned Action
2. Learning            Measures changes in knowledge, skills, and attitudes.



3. Application         Measures changes in the performance setting.


4. Business Impact     Measures changes in business impact variables.



5. Return on           Compares benefits to the costs.
   Investment
Corporate Social Responsibility
A mindset as much as a policy
Predictive Validity
 Method                                  Validity (r)*)        Multiple R**)

   GMA Tests
   (General Mental Ability Tests)                .51
   Job knowledge tests                           .48                   .58
   Interview, structured                         .51                   .63
   Interview, unstructured                       .38                   .55
   PMI Tests (Integrity tests)                   .41                   .65                  Quality of
   Assessment centres                            .37                   .53                  Mercuri Urval’s
                                                                                            PMI-procedure
   Biographical data                             .35                   .52
   Job experience                                .18                   .54
   Reference check                               .26                   .57
   Years of education                            .10                   .52
   Interests                                     .10                   .52
   Graphology                                    .02                   .51

Predictive validity for job performance of different measures
(Different Parts of Mercuri Urval Individual Assessments are bold).
Definition:
*) Validity (r) refers to predictive validity of the personnel measure
**) Multiple R refers to the combined predictive validity of GMA tests and the specific personell measure



Source: Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology:
Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
Predictive Validity
Leading Global Client (2008-10)
From 2008 to 2010, we performed 946 selections of people in managerial positions in over
30 countries for our client. In 2008, 509 people were assessed and of the 352 subsequently
recommended by Mercuri Urval, 91% were meeting or exceeding expectations in the yearly
performance appraisal, where both performance and behaviour was evaluated. In 2009-10,
Mercuri Urval assessed 437 and recommended 300 of which 95% met or exceeded the
expectations of their immediate manager.

The research was independently conducted by our client

Empirical Validity Study (2004-2008)
The performance of employed individuals was evaluated after 6-12 months by the employer
on a three-step scale:

1= Not meeting the demands
2= Meeting the demands
3= Exceeding the demands

                    Not Meeting        Meeting            Exceeding

 Performance        15                 227                162
 Outcome


Result: from 1350 assessments = 94% meet or exceed expectations
800 people – 75 offices – 50 countries – 3000 clients – 10 000 assignments – 1 million candidates

More Related Content

What's hot (11)

Job Evaluation Point Method
Job Evaluation Point MethodJob Evaluation Point Method
Job Evaluation Point Method
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Case study of job evaluation
Case study of job evaluationCase study of job evaluation
Case study of job evaluation
 
The effects of supervisory behavior on it employees’ job satisfaction an expl...
The effects of supervisory behavior on it employees’ job satisfaction an expl...The effects of supervisory behavior on it employees’ job satisfaction an expl...
The effects of supervisory behavior on it employees’ job satisfaction an expl...
 
Point method in job evaluation ppt
Point method in job evaluation pptPoint method in job evaluation ppt
Point method in job evaluation ppt
 
Hrm job evaluation
Hrm job evaluationHrm job evaluation
Hrm job evaluation
 
Job Evaluation
Job EvaluationJob Evaluation
Job Evaluation
 
Job evaluation b
Job evaluation bJob evaluation b
Job evaluation b
 
job evaluation
job evaluation job evaluation
job evaluation
 
The cinderella predictor
The cinderella predictor The cinderella predictor
The cinderella predictor
 
Human and administrative behavior in education, ganas
Human and administrative behavior in education, ganasHuman and administrative behavior in education, ganas
Human and administrative behavior in education, ganas
 

Viewers also liked (7)

Ten statements on leadership
Ten statements on leadershipTen statements on leadership
Ten statements on leadership
 
Reclutamiento y selección Mercuri Urval
Reclutamiento y selección Mercuri UrvalReclutamiento y selección Mercuri Urval
Reclutamiento y selección Mercuri Urval
 
Your career in logistics at Kuehne + Nagel - Move the world
Your career in logistics at Kuehne + Nagel - Move the worldYour career in logistics at Kuehne + Nagel - Move the world
Your career in logistics at Kuehne + Nagel - Move the world
 
Personality Assessment
Personality AssessmentPersonality Assessment
Personality Assessment
 
Mercuri Urval Assessment Overview
Mercuri Urval Assessment OverviewMercuri Urval Assessment Overview
Mercuri Urval Assessment Overview
 
Personality assessment
Personality assessmentPersonality assessment
Personality assessment
 
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your NicheHow to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
 

Similar to Presenting Mercuri Urval

Introduction : Employee testing and selection
Introduction : Employee testing and selectionIntroduction : Employee testing and selection
Introduction : Employee testing and selection
Micha Paramitha
 
Course module hrm
Course module hrmCourse module hrm
Course module hrm
hmahajan235
 
Course module hrm
Course module hrmCourse module hrm
Course module hrm
hmahajan235
 
principlesofhrm by muchipalli
principlesofhrm by muchipalliprinciplesofhrm by muchipalli
principlesofhrm by muchipalli
Suresh Muchipalli
 
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling Pratik Negi
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling   Pratik NegiOb Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling   Pratik Negi
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling Pratik Negi
pratik negi
 
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling Pratik Negi
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling   Pratik NegiOb Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling   Pratik Negi
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling Pratik Negi
pratik negi
 
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]Vi perfm-appraisal[1]
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]
komporg4s
 
AONE Prophecy Healthcare Presentation 2012
AONE Prophecy Healthcare Presentation 2012AONE Prophecy Healthcare Presentation 2012
AONE Prophecy Healthcare Presentation 2012
Prophecy Healthcare
 
DNA HR Consulting - Assessments and Related Services
DNA HR Consulting - Assessments and Related ServicesDNA HR Consulting - Assessments and Related Services
DNA HR Consulting - Assessments and Related Services
Jane McCarthy
 

Similar to Presenting Mercuri Urval (20)

Recruitment Management-Ch 7 Selection Tests.
Recruitment Management-Ch 7 Selection Tests.Recruitment Management-Ch 7 Selection Tests.
Recruitment Management-Ch 7 Selection Tests.
 
University project performance appraisal(4)
University project performance appraisal(4)University project performance appraisal(4)
University project performance appraisal(4)
 
Capacity Trust - Psychometric Assessment Proposal
Capacity Trust - Psychometric Assessment ProposalCapacity Trust - Psychometric Assessment Proposal
Capacity Trust - Psychometric Assessment Proposal
 
Introduction : Employee testing and selection
Introduction : Employee testing and selectionIntroduction : Employee testing and selection
Introduction : Employee testing and selection
 
Course module hrm
Course module hrmCourse module hrm
Course module hrm
 
Course module hrm
Course module hrmCourse module hrm
Course module hrm
 
Selection process final
Selection process finalSelection process final
Selection process final
 
principlesofhrm by muchipalli
principlesofhrm by muchipalliprinciplesofhrm by muchipalli
principlesofhrm by muchipalli
 
Myths and Realities of Psychometric Testing
Myths and Realities of Psychometric TestingMyths and Realities of Psychometric Testing
Myths and Realities of Psychometric Testing
 
Science-Based Hiring: An Actionable Guide
Science-Based Hiring: An Actionable GuideScience-Based Hiring: An Actionable Guide
Science-Based Hiring: An Actionable Guide
 
Impact of Recruitment & Selection Processes on Employee Performance: A Study ...
Impact of Recruitment & Selection Processes on Employee Performance: A Study ...Impact of Recruitment & Selection Processes on Employee Performance: A Study ...
Impact of Recruitment & Selection Processes on Employee Performance: A Study ...
 
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling Pratik Negi
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling   Pratik NegiOb Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling   Pratik Negi
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling Pratik Negi
 
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling Pratik Negi
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling   Pratik NegiOb Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling   Pratik Negi
Ob Hrd Performance Mgment And Councling Pratik Negi
 
Motivation
MotivationMotivation
Motivation
 
Selection and on boarding process
Selection and on boarding processSelection and on boarding process
Selection and on boarding process
 
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]Vi perfm-appraisal[1]
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]
 
AONE Prophecy Healthcare Presentation 2012
AONE Prophecy Healthcare Presentation 2012AONE Prophecy Healthcare Presentation 2012
AONE Prophecy Healthcare Presentation 2012
 
DNA HR Consulting - Assessments and Related Services
DNA HR Consulting - Assessments and Related ServicesDNA HR Consulting - Assessments and Related Services
DNA HR Consulting - Assessments and Related Services
 
Verification of Coaching Results (ROI)
Verification of Coaching Results (ROI)Verification of Coaching Results (ROI)
Verification of Coaching Results (ROI)
 
Testing selection
Testing selectionTesting selection
Testing selection
 

Presenting Mercuri Urval

  • 1. Mercuri Urval How our Company can help yours “ It’s all about people™
  • 2. Our Company Wherever you need us, we are there • Founded in 1967 • More than 3.000 clients in all sectors • Independent. Organically grown • Small, medium and large organisations • Operating in over 50 countries worldwide • Local, national and global partnerships • 800 professionals in 75 offices • Over 10.000 assignments every year
  • 3. Our approach The right people will deliver the right results “ Achieving tomorrows results is about aligning people with new strategies
  • 4. How can we help? Securing the right talent, in the right place at the right time “ We are pioneers in predicting the impact people will have on results
  • 5. What we do Strengthening you people performance “ We are a result focused international people consultancy
  • 6. What we do Service in detail
  • 8. Who we do it for Helping the best be even better T-Systems
  • 9. ROI Basic Method Level Measurement Focus 1. Reaction, Measures participant satisfaction and captures planned Satisfaction, and actions. Planned Action 2. Learning Measures changes in knowledge, skills, and attitudes. 3. Application Measures changes in the performance setting. 4. Business Impact Measures changes in business impact variables. 5. Return on Compares benefits to the costs. Investment
  • 10. Corporate Social Responsibility A mindset as much as a policy
  • 11. Predictive Validity Method Validity (r)*) Multiple R**) GMA Tests (General Mental Ability Tests) .51 Job knowledge tests .48 .58 Interview, structured .51 .63 Interview, unstructured .38 .55 PMI Tests (Integrity tests) .41 .65 Quality of Assessment centres .37 .53 Mercuri Urval’s PMI-procedure Biographical data .35 .52 Job experience .18 .54 Reference check .26 .57 Years of education .10 .52 Interests .10 .52 Graphology .02 .51 Predictive validity for job performance of different measures (Different Parts of Mercuri Urval Individual Assessments are bold). Definition: *) Validity (r) refers to predictive validity of the personnel measure **) Multiple R refers to the combined predictive validity of GMA tests and the specific personell measure Source: Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
  • 12. Predictive Validity Leading Global Client (2008-10) From 2008 to 2010, we performed 946 selections of people in managerial positions in over 30 countries for our client. In 2008, 509 people were assessed and of the 352 subsequently recommended by Mercuri Urval, 91% were meeting or exceeding expectations in the yearly performance appraisal, where both performance and behaviour was evaluated. In 2009-10, Mercuri Urval assessed 437 and recommended 300 of which 95% met or exceeded the expectations of their immediate manager. The research was independently conducted by our client Empirical Validity Study (2004-2008) The performance of employed individuals was evaluated after 6-12 months by the employer on a three-step scale: 1= Not meeting the demands 2= Meeting the demands 3= Exceeding the demands Not Meeting Meeting Exceeding Performance 15 227 162 Outcome Result: from 1350 assessments = 94% meet or exceed expectations
  • 13. 800 people – 75 offices – 50 countries – 3000 clients – 10 000 assignments – 1 million candidates