SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Abigail Toomer
Legal Research Class
1/10/2011

   1. a. RAYTHEON CO. v. HERNANDEZ
      b. Carter G. Phillips, Alan Charles Raul, Paul Grossman, Paul W. Cane, Jr., Neal D. Mollen, Jay B.
      Stephens, and Ronald Stolkin.


   2.   a. COOPER v. OKLAHOMA
        b. Justice Stevens

   3.   a. MURPHY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Inc.
        b. Justice Stevens and Justice Breyer

   4.    a. TENNARD v. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL
        INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
        b. March 22, 2004
        c. June 24, 2004
        d. Jury sentenced Tennard to death. Tennard argues that his low IQ deemed him mentally
        retarded which led him to commit the crime and that his sentence violated 8th Amendment
        rights.
        e. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE v. SUDERS
        f. 542 U.S. 129 (2004)
        g. Justice Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion, he did not believe that Suders proved
        constructive discharge based on sexual harassment.

More Related Content

What's hot

Twelve Angry Men Updated
Twelve Angry Men UpdatedTwelve Angry Men Updated
Twelve Angry Men Updatedjpinnuck
 
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal gene
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal geneE2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal gene
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal geneAarono1979
 
Juvenile Justice RP
Juvenile Justice RPJuvenile Justice RP
Juvenile Justice RPJD Mac
 
Hall Elizabeth Unit Nine Ethic's Project
Hall Elizabeth Unit Nine Ethic's ProjectHall Elizabeth Unit Nine Ethic's Project
Hall Elizabeth Unit Nine Ethic's ProjectElizabeth Hall
 
Racial Bias in Criminal Sentencing
Racial Bias in Criminal SentencingRacial Bias in Criminal Sentencing
Racial Bias in Criminal Sentencingtkhartman
 
Mock trial instructions, spring 2021 (1)
Mock trial instructions, spring 2021 (1)Mock trial instructions, spring 2021 (1)
Mock trial instructions, spring 2021 (1)ShakespeareanStudent
 
Review on documentary 13th
Review on documentary 13thReview on documentary 13th
Review on documentary 13thjojo6774
 
Gender based social reactions powerpoint
Gender based social reactions powerpointGender based social reactions powerpoint
Gender based social reactions powerpointBethannie216
 

What's hot (14)

Twelve Angry Men Updated
Twelve Angry Men UpdatedTwelve Angry Men Updated
Twelve Angry Men Updated
 
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal gene
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal geneE2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal gene
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal gene
 
Juvenile Justice RP
Juvenile Justice RPJuvenile Justice RP
Juvenile Justice RP
 
12 Angry Men
12 Angry Men12 Angry Men
12 Angry Men
 
Hall Elizabeth Unit Nine Ethic's Project
Hall Elizabeth Unit Nine Ethic's ProjectHall Elizabeth Unit Nine Ethic's Project
Hall Elizabeth Unit Nine Ethic's Project
 
Racial Bias in Criminal Sentencing
Racial Bias in Criminal SentencingRacial Bias in Criminal Sentencing
Racial Bias in Criminal Sentencing
 
Mock trial instructions, spring 2021 (1)
Mock trial instructions, spring 2021 (1)Mock trial instructions, spring 2021 (1)
Mock trial instructions, spring 2021 (1)
 
Juror 9
Juror 9Juror 9
Juror 9
 
Review on documentary 13th
Review on documentary 13thReview on documentary 13th
Review on documentary 13th
 
12 angry men
12 angry men12 angry men
12 angry men
 
Juror 8
Juror 8Juror 8
Juror 8
 
Gender based social reactions powerpoint
Gender based social reactions powerpointGender based social reactions powerpoint
Gender based social reactions powerpoint
 
Juror 4
Juror 4Juror 4
Juror 4
 
Juror 3
Juror 3Juror 3
Juror 3
 

Abigail toomer

  • 1. Abigail Toomer Legal Research Class 1/10/2011 1. a. RAYTHEON CO. v. HERNANDEZ b. Carter G. Phillips, Alan Charles Raul, Paul Grossman, Paul W. Cane, Jr., Neal D. Mollen, Jay B. Stephens, and Ronald Stolkin. 2. a. COOPER v. OKLAHOMA b. Justice Stevens 3. a. MURPHY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Inc. b. Justice Stevens and Justice Breyer 4. a. TENNARD v. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION b. March 22, 2004 c. June 24, 2004 d. Jury sentenced Tennard to death. Tennard argues that his low IQ deemed him mentally retarded which led him to commit the crime and that his sentence violated 8th Amendment rights. e. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE v. SUDERS f. 542 U.S. 129 (2004) g. Justice Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion, he did not believe that Suders proved constructive discharge based on sexual harassment.