IIDom <- c(18, 14, 14, 12, 10, 8, 10, 15, 12, 18) IINon <- c(21, 20, 20, 18, 15, 20, 19, 20, 15, 18)
IINon <- c(21, 20, 20, 18, 15, 20, 19, 20, 15, 18)
significance level of 0.10
Are the samples determined by Method II considered Independent or Dependent Samples
Can you assume normality? Yes or No and explain your answer using the p-value.
-I got a p-value for the dominant hand to be 0.6136 and the p value for non-dominat hand to be
0.03647. Is this correct?
Do you need to test for equal variances? Yes or No. Explain your reasoning
State your decision and interpretation (ie. Decision: Reject Ho/Fail to Reject Ho. Interpretation:
There is enough evidence to support Ha/there is not enough evidence to support Ha) Remember
to make the statements relative to the context of the experiment..
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
IIDom lt c18 14 14 12 10 8 10 15 12 18 IINon .pdf
1. IIDom <- c(18, 14, 14, 12, 10, 8, 10, 15, 12, 18) IINon <- c(21, 20, 20, 18, 15, 20, 19, 20, 15, 18)
IINon <- c(21, 20, 20, 18, 15, 20, 19, 20, 15, 18)
significance level of 0.10
Are the samples determined by Method II considered Independent or Dependent Samples
Can you assume normality? Yes or No and explain your answer using the p-value.
-I got a p-value for the dominant hand to be 0.6136 and the p value for non-dominat hand to be
0.03647. Is this correct?
Do you need to test for equal variances? Yes or No. Explain your reasoning
State your decision and interpretation (ie. Decision: Reject Ho/Fail to Reject Ho. Interpretation:
There is enough evidence to support Ha/there is not enough evidence to support Ha) Remember
to make the statements relative to the context of the experiment.
