Notes on Central Asian History during 200 BC and its effects on later history, Role of Yuezhi migration in Ancient History of Central Asia, settlement of Yuezhi after migration and various theories about current form of Ancient Yuezhi tribe: (Gurjar/Gujjar/Gujar/Gusar/Gusur/Khazar/Ughar/Gazar/Gusarova)

1. Great Yuezhi Migration
from
Tarim Besin
Notes on Central Asian History during 200 BC and its effects on later
history, Role of Yuezhi migration in Ancient History of Central Asia,
settlement of Yuezhi after migration and various theories about
current form of Ancient Yuezhi tribe:
(Gurjar/Gujjar/Gujar/Gusar/Gusur/Khazar/Ughar/Gazar/Gusarova)
By: Adesh Katariya

2. ImportantNote
Till now many researches published on the history of Great Yuezhi/Gurjar tribe but scholars
are not in position to clarify all happenings in a series. In this article, wearetryingtocompileall
happenings as per their timings. We also would like to clarify thatthematerialunderthisarticle
is not a copyright matter and main motive of this article is, to attract good scholars to discuss
andresearch onthegreat Yuezhi/Gurjar Tribe.
- Adesh Katariya
( plast.adesh@gmail.com)

3. Great Yuezhi Migration (Westward Path):
The Yuzhi migration was one of mass proportions. Some scholars believe that their migration of
people comprised of hundreds of bowmen and the group of millions people of all ages and
genders (Smith 1999:248).
In their westward search for adequate agricultural land the Yuzhi encountered numerous
hostile groups. The first of these groups, the Wu-san, were located along the basins of the Ili
River (Smith 1999: 248).
First Yuezhi– Wusun War
174 BCE Modun, the shanyu of the Xiongnu, died; his son Lao Shang,(Laoshan,proper name:
Jizhu) succeeded him as shanyu. The Xiongnu s' attack against the Yuezhi to the west triggered
a chain reaction, In 173 BCE the Yuezhi attacked and overran the Wusun. Wu-san, were located
along the basins of the Ili River (Smith 1999: 248).Nandoumi, the kunmo (supreme chieftain) of
the Wusun, was killed. After that defeat, the Wusun people and the heir to their throne, still an
infant, moved to Xiongnu and sought protection. They become vassals to the Xiongnu Some
time later, his infant son Liejiaomi was left in the wild. Liejiaomi was eventually found by the
Xiongnu. According to a legend recorded in the Hanshu (an ancient Chinese history text that is
sequel to Sima Quien's Shiji), Liejiaomi was suckled by a she-wolf and fed meat by ravens while
he was in the wild. Liejiaomi was eventually found by the Xiongnu. The Xiongnu's shanyu Jizhu
(a.k.a. Lao Shang) adopted Liejiaomi and raised him. When Liejiaomi came of age, Jizhu saw to it
that he was made the kunmo of the Xiongnu like his father had been. Jizhu also made Liejiaomi
the commander of the far western region of the Xiongnu Empire as a vassal of the Xiongnu.
Later, he was sent by the shanyu, together with his people, to protect the western borders of
the state.
First Scythian-Yuezhi War
.
Under the attack of the Wusun, the Yueh-chih (Yuezhi) migrated southwest to the Oxus Valley,
pushing out the Scythians again, who had a larger number of individuals then the Wu-san, and
also tried to defend themselves but fell to the mass fighting force of Yuzhi. The Yuzhi then
settled in the prosperous agricultural region occupied by the Sakas (Smith 1999: 249).
According to the ancient Book of Han: "The Yuezhi attacked the king of the Sai who moved a
considerable distance to the south and the Yuezhi then occupied his lands." This forced the
Scythians to undertake their own migration, south to the Iran Plateau, Afghanistan and
northern India, where for a time they established a loosely defined Indo-Scythian Rule. The
Yuezhi's high percentage of men under arms relative to their total size (ancient sources

4. estimate the Yuezhi could deploy 200,000 horse archers out of a total tribal population of
400,000) made them a formidable opponent. The new country in Central Asia would be called
Yueh-chih (Yuezhi) Major the Greater Yüeh-chih. This touched off a wave of 'chain reactions'.
The Scythians went to take over the Greco-Bactria kingdom. They then settled west of the
Yaksarat river (Syr Darya) in Sogdiana. The event is briefly hinted at by Strabo, who simply calls
them “Sakas”(Sakai) and places them there in his “Geography”. At that time, Sogdiana was
probably still Greco-Bactrian territory.
Yuezhi’s Further Migration to South West
Second Yuezhi– Wusun War
In 173 B.C., Han Emperor Wendi replied to Mote (Modu) (Modok, wrongly pronounced as
Maodun) Chanyu emphasizing the wish for peace. With Mote dead, his son, Jiyu, got enthroned
as Laoshang Chanyu. Wendi ordered that an eunuch by the name of Zhongxing Shuo
accompany a Han princess to the Xiongnu s. Zhongxing Shuo tricked Laoshang Chanyu in saying
that Han Dynasty intended the Xiongnu s to wear the silk clothes instead of the cavalry clothes.
Zhongxing Shuo would instigate the Xiongnu s in attacking Han, and he also taught the Xiongnu
s how to count cattle and horses.
In about 161 B.C.E., when Laoshang Chanyu was still alive, the Wusun Prince, Liejiaomi became
a strong young man and a ruler, he requested that the shanyu (Laoshan) allow him to take
revenge on the Yuezhi. He received permission and attacked the Yuezhi who were then living
west of him, defeated the Yuezhi and took over today's Ili area. The Yuzhi remained in this
agricultural region for fifteen to twenty years (Smith: 249). At the time of Junchen Chanyu,
under the attack of Wusun- Xiongnu alliance ,the Yuezhi, continued their march westward and
settled in the valley,Oxus where they conquered the Ta-hai who had lived there (Smith: 250).
However, shortly afterwards the shanyu died and “kunmo” remained in his new country and
declared himself independent. In other words, the war with and the conquest of the Yuezhi
occurred during the last years of Laoshan’s reign, therefore in 160/161, when he died, the
Wusuns were already masters of the Area of the Seven Rivers, which tells us the Yuezhi only
inhabited the region for a few years.The Yueh-chih (Yuezhi) people were driven away from the
Scythian land by the Wusun Statelet. Yueh-chih (Yuezhi) moved on to occupy Bactria .
It is clear that the two events, the migration the “Royal Sakas” and the conquest of the Area of
the Seven rivers, and the Yuezhi by the Wusuni, with their subsequent migration to the
southwest,around Dayuan in the land of Kangju (The lands between the rivers Amu Darya and
Syr Darya) (1) and the conquest of Eastern Bactria, or Daxia (Tachara / Tochara) (2) occurred
within a few years of each other, almost similtaneously. TheChinese historian Xu Sung, who
lived in the XVIII - XIX century (1781-1848) drew attention to this fact in his commentary to
“Han-shu”. He was subsequently quoted by Stan Konov. If we look at the sentence Pompeiy

5. Trogus uses in his “Prologues”: “How the Asians became kings of the Tocharians and destroyed
the Sakaraulians”, we see a full match. The Asians / Wusun conquered the Tocharians who are,
technically, Yuezhi / Arsians, and drove the “Royal Sakas” from their land. (HSh), (CD-ZhQ, p. 39)
Yuezhi Occupy Bectria:
The Yuezhi 月氏 then conquered the land of Kangju 康居 and settled westward along the valley
of the Syr Darya (Yaxarat) river .There, they encountered the Sakaraukas / Sai-wang 塞王once
again and drove them south from Sogdiana. The “Sai-wang” had no other choice but to cross
the Hissar ridge and invade the land, which Chang Jiang called “Daxia (Tachara / Tochara)”,
located along the upper stream of the Ox river (Amu Darya). They conquered the territory and
kept for half a generation. They are the elusive nomads, who stormed and burned the ancient
Hellenistic city of Ai Hanuman (called Eucratideia at the time) to the ground. With the fall of this
great Greek fortress, the road is open for them to take over Tochara in its entirety or the
eastern part of Bactria. Bactria was a key centre on the extensive trade routes developed to
transport lapis lazuli, spinel rubies and, quite possibly, emeralds – see Giuliani et al (2000), pp.
631-633 – from the mines in the mountains. Lapis lazuli from Badhakshan was being traded to
Mesopotamia, and Egypt as early as the second half of the fourth millennium BCE and to the
Indus River cultures by the third millennium. These routes were later to form the basis of the
so-called ‘Silk Routes.’
Following the settlement of the Yuezhi (referred to by the Greeks as Tókharoi), the general area
of Bactria came to be called Tokharistan. The territory of Tokharistan was identical with Kushan
Bactria, including the areas of Surkhandarya, Southern Tajikistan and Northern Afghanistan.
Around 145 BC, the Yuezhi sacked the Greek city of Alexandria on the Oxus, present-day Ai
Khanoum. Archaeological evidence about this event was found during the excavations of the
Old Town of Alexandria / Eucratideia (Ai Hanum). Archaeological analysis shows that the
fortress was conquered and burned about 145 B.C.E.
Political Structure of Yuezhi States:
."The Yuezhi were organized into five major tribes, each led by a yabgu, or tribal chief, and
known to the Chinese as Xiūmì (休密) in Western Wakhān and Zibak, Kushan (貴霜) in
Badakhshan and the adjoining territories north of the Oxus, Shuangmi (雙靡) in the region of
Shughnan, Xidun (肸頓) in the region of Balkh, and Dūmì (都密) in the region of Termez.".
The claim that Da Yuezhi 大月氏 established the five Xihou 翖侯 after they had destroyed the
state of Daxia 大夏 in the Hou Hanshu 後漢書, ch. 88, is based on the Hanshu 漢書, ch. 96A. In
the latter it is recorded:
Originally Daxia 大夏 had no major overlord or chief, and minor chiefs were frequently
established in the towns. The inhabitants are weak and afraid of fighting, with the result that
when the Yuezhi 月氏 migrated there, they made them all into their subjects. They provide

6. supplies for Han 漢 envoys. There are five Xihou 翖侯. The first is entitled the Xihou 翖侯 of
Xiumi 休密, and the seat of government is at the town of Hemo 和墨; it is distant by 2,841 li 里
from [the seat of] the Protector General and 7,802 li 里 from the Yang 陽 Barrier. The second is
entitled the Xihou 翖侯 of Shuangmi 雙靡, and the seat of government is at the town of
Shuangmi 雙靡; it is distant by 3,741 li 里 from [the seat of] the Protector General and 7,782 li
里 from the Yang 陽 Barrier. The third is entitled the Xihou 翖侯 of Kushan 貴霜, and the seat
of government is at the town of Huzao 護澡; it is distant by 5,940 li 里 from [the seat of] the
Protector General and 7,982 li 里 from the Yang 陽 Barrier. The fourth is entitled the Xihou
翖侯 of Bidun 肸頓, and the seat of government is at the town of Bomao 薄茅; it is distant by
5,962 li 里 from [the seat of] the Protector General and 8,202 li 里 from the Yang 陽 Barrier.
The fifth is entitled the Xihou 翖侯 of Gaofu 高附, and the seat of government is at the town of
Gaofu 高附; it is distant by 6,041 li 里 from [the seat of the] Protector General and 9,238 li 里
from the Yang 陽 Barrier. All the five Xihou 翖侯 are subject to the Da Yuezhi 大月氏. According
to this, the five Xihou 翖侯 were in fact not the Yuezhi 月氏 people, but were the people in the
state of Daxia 大夏. This is because there was no sovereign who could order the whole country
in the state of Daxia 大夏, where each town carried out its affairs in its own way and was ruled
by a so-called “minor chief.” The Yuezhi 月氏 did not wipe out these “minor chiefs,” but “made
them all into their subjects” after they had conquered the state of Daxia 大夏.
References:
 Beckwith, Christopher I. (2009). Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the
Bronze Age to the Present. Princeton University Press. ISBN 1400829941.
 Falk, Harry. 1995–1996. Silk Road Art and Archaeology IV.
 Falk, Harry. 2001. "The yuga of Sphujiddhvaja and the era of the Kuṣāṇas." Silk Road Art and Archaeology VII,
pp. 121–136.
 Falk, Harry. 2004. "The Kaniṣka era in Gupta records." Harry Falk. Silk Road Art and Archaeology X, pp. 167–176.
 Goyal, S. R. "Ancient Indian Inscriptions" Kusumanjali Book World, Jodhpur (India), 2005.
 Hill, John E. (2009). Through the Jade Gate to Rome: A Study of the Silk Routes during the Later Han Dynasty,
First to Second Centuries CE. BookSurge. ISBN 978-1-4392-2134-1.
 Lebedynsky, Iaroslav (2006). Les Saces. Paris: Editions Errance. ISBN 2-87772-337-2.
 Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. (1999). The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of
Civilization to 221 BC. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-5214-7030-7. Retrieved 2013-11-01.
 Mallory, J. P. (1989). In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology, and Myth. Thames and
Hudson. ISBN 050005052X. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
 Mallory, J. P. (1997). Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 1884964982. Retrieved 29
May 2015.
 Mallory, J. P.; Mair, Victor H. (2000). "The Tarim Mummies: Ancient China and the Mystery of the Earliest Peoples
from the West". London: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 0-500-05101-1..
 Pulleyblank, Edwin G. (1966). Chinese and Indo-Europeans. University of British Columbia, Department of Asian
Studies. Retrieved February 14, 2015.
 Rosenfield, John M. (1993). The Dynastic Art of the Kushans. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal. ISBN 81-215-
0579-8.
 Sivaramamurti, C. (1976). Śatarudrīya: Vibhūti of Śiva's Iconography. Delhi: Abhinav Publications.
 Roux, Jean-Paul, L'Asie Centrale, Histoire et Civilization (French), Fayard, 1997, ISBN 978-2-213-59894-9

7.  Benjamin, Craig (2007). The Yuezhi: Origin, Migration and the Conquest of Northern Bactria.
ISD. ISBN 250352429X. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
 Avari, Burjor (2007). India: The Ancient Past. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-35616-9.
 Bopearachchi, Osmund (2003). De l'Indus à l'Oxus, Archéologie de l'Asie Centrale (in French). Lattes: Association
imago-musée de Lattes. ISBN 2-9516679-2-2.
 Chavannes, Édouard (1906). Trois Généraux Chinois de la dynastie des Han Orientaux. Pan Tch’ao (32–102
p.C.); – son fils Pan Yong; – Leang K’in (112 p.C.). Chapitre LXXVII du Heou Han chou''. T’oung pao 7.
 Faccenna, Domenico (1980). Butkara I (Sw āt, Pakistan) 1956–1962, Volume III 1 (in English). Rome: IsMEO
(Istituto Italiano Per Il Medio Ed Estremo Oriente).
 Chavannes, Édouard (1907). Les pays d'occident d'après le Heou Han chou. T’oung pao 8. pp. 149–244.
 Enoki, K.; Koshelenko, G. A.; Haidary, Z. (1 January 1994). "The Yu'eh-chih and their migrations". In Harmatta,
János. History of Civilizations of Central Asia: The Development of Sedentary and Nomadic Civilizations, 700 B. C. to A. D.
250. UNESCO. pp. 171–191. ISBN 9231028464. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
 West, Barbara A. (January 1, 2009). Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania. Infobase
Publishing. ISBN 1438119135. Retrieved 2015-05-29
 Bernard, P. (1994). "The Greek Kingdoms of Central Asia". In Harmatta, János. History of civilizations
of Central Asia, Volume II. The development of sedentary and nomadic civilizations: 700 B.C. to A.D. 250(PDF).
Paris: UNESCO. pp. 96–126. ISBN 92-3-102846-4.
 Enoki, K.; Koshelenko, G. A.; Haidary, Z. (1 January 1994). "The Yu'eh-chih and their migrations".
In Harmatta, János. History of Civilizations of Central Asia: The Development of Sedentary and Nomadic
Civilizations, 700 B. C. to A. D. 250. UNESCO. pp. 171–191. ISBN 9231028464. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
 Hanks, Brian K.; Linduff, Katheryn M. (2009). Social Complexity in Prehistoric Eurasia: Monuments,
Metals and Mobility. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521517125.
 "The Silk Road: Overland Trade and Cultural Interactions in Eurasia". In Adas, Michael. Agricultural
and pastoral societies in ancient and classical history. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. pp. 151–
179. ISBN 978-1-56639-832-9.
 Ricket, W.A. (1998). Guanzi: Political, Economic, and Philosophic Essays from Early China. Vol.II.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
 Roux, Jean-Paul (1997). L'Asie Centrale, Histoire et Civilization (French), Fayard, ISBN 978-2-213-
59894-9.
 Watson, Burton (1993). Records of the Grand Historian of China: Han Dynasty II (revised
ed.). ISBN 0-231-08166-9. ISBN 0-231-08167-7 (pbk.) Translated from the Shiji of Sima Qian.
 The Silk Road in World History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-516174-8.
 Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. (1999). The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the
Origins of Civilization to 221 BC. Cambridge University Press. pp. 87–88. ISBN 0-5214-7030-7.
 Mallory, J. P. (1997). Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 1884964982.
Retrieved 29 May 2015.
 Haw, Stephen G. (2006). Beijing – A Concise History. Routledge. ISBN 1134150334.
 Hill, John E. (2009). Through the Jade Gate to Rome: A Study of the Silk Routes during the Later Han
Dynasty, 1st to 2nd Centuries CE. Charleston, South Carolina: BookSurge. ISBN 978-1-4392-2134-1.
 Liu, Xinru (2001a). "Migration and Settlement of the Yuezhi-Kushan. Interaction and Interdependence
of Nomadic and Sedentary Societies". Journal of World History 12 (2): 261–
292.doi:10.1353/jwh.2001.0034. JSTOR 20078910.
 Mallory, J. P.; Mair, Victor H. (2000). The Tarim Mummies: Ancient China and the Mystery of the
Earliest Peoples from the West. London: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 0-500-05101-1.
 Mallory, James (2006). The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indoeuropean and the Proto-Indoeuropean
world. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-929668-5.