could you please write reading review about *Dewey, The Quest for Certainty, Ch. 1 Veblen, \"Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science\" consisting 500 words, my homework due is today at 10:00 p.m. Solution \"Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science\" was written in1898. According to veblin the only rational approach is to assume economies evolve because he argued that we can describe the economy and have not any effective theory of change and development. Veblen classes the assumption that that economies ‘normally’ tend towards equilibrium—as no more rational that the spiritually-based notion that there is a final cause or teleological pull towards some natural outcome due to natural law; that is, “a preconception regarding the ends to which, in the nature of things, all things tend (P.392) .Veblen is insistent, however, that we cannot understand economics without paying attention to human learning.Veblen does not see evolution as something that happens primarily to individuals but as a collective change to societies, and collections of institutions.According to him evolution is a dispassionate cumulative causation..Most of the people including me likes this paper because it reminds us that most of what we think has been thought before, just not acted upon; because it seems to sow the seeds for much of what followed in terms of complexity and evolutionary economics.Veblen in his paper has sheer command of language and he touches on most of the challenges that economist ever since have raised about.

1. could you please write reading review about
*Dewey, The Quest for Certainty, Ch. 1
Veblen, "Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science"
consisting 500 words, my homework due is today at 10:00 p.m.
Solution
"Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science" was written in1898. According to veblin the
only rational approach is to assume economies evolve because he argued that we can describe
the economy and have not any effective theory of change and development. Veblen classes the
assumption that that economies ‘normally’ tend towards equilibrium—as no more rational that
the spiritually-based notion that there is a final cause or teleological pull towards some natural
outcome due to natural law; that is, “a preconception regarding the ends to which, in the nature
of things, all things tend (P.392) .Veblen is insistent, however, that we cannot understand
economics without paying attention to human learning.Veblen does not see evolution as
something that happens primarily to individuals but as a collective change to societies, and
collections of institutions.According to him evolution is a dispassionate cumulative
causation..Most of the people including me likes this paper because it reminds us that most of
what we think has been thought before, just not acted upon; because it seems to sow the seeds for
much of what followed in terms of complexity and evolutionary economics.Veblen in his paper
has sheer command of language and he touches on most of the challenges that economist ever
since have raised about