2. HYBRID AGGRESSION –
HYBRID WARFARE
Hybrid aggression - one state desires to impose its will on another,
without formally violating the international law, using mechanisms of
influence, not just elements of hostilities
Hybrid aggression may be displayed in economic, energy, information,
cultural and other spheres
Ukraine faces the hybrid WAR, as far as the military component is
undoubtful (due to UNO data, at least 13000 died), the Crimea is
annexed, the war in the Donbas region is continuing
3. THE FOOTHOLDS OF
HYBRID AGGRESSION
Crimea and Donbas were on the periphery of Ukraine's state policy
Crimea and Donbass were constantly in the Russian information field
The presence of the Russian Black Sea Navy Fleet in Crimea
The negative perception of Crimean Tatars in Kyiv, distrust to them
Russian was free to lead propaganda in Crimea and the Donbass
The official geopolitical position of Ukraine was blurred
4. MANIFESTATIONS OF
HYBRID AGGRESSION
• Disinformation on the state level
• Discreditation of Ukraine in the eyes of the West partners (Russia Today, Olgino)
• Massive information attacks and numerous fakes in social media
• Economic pressure and sanctions
• Energy leverages (i.e., gas transit)
• Aggression in humanitarian sphere
7. MOTIVATION OF
RUSSIA
Intensive use of the new type of hybrid weapon
Effective destabilization in the country with the possibility to broadcast the
results of the influence to another countries, EU, in particular
A showcase of undermining the trust to the democratic values
The interference is multi-pronged and cross-border
Sanctions as an answer are doubtful
There is no legislation for countering the hybrid interference neither in Ukraine,
nor in civilized world
8. BELIEVE IT OR NOT
IS LOVE ALL
AROUND???
NO!
EVERYTHING MAY
BECOME AN
INSTRUMENT OF
HYBRID WARFARE
9. NEW RUSSIAN HISTORY POLICY
75TH anniversary of the victory in World War II pushes Russia to revise the history
of the war in general
Intent to use anti-Semitism as a factor of discrediting Poland, Ukraine, Baltic
countries
Hyperbolising Russia’s role in defending Nazism through the manipulations with
archival materials
Deepening the contradictions between the different parts of Europe
Manipulations with the problem of collaborations with the Nazi during World
War II
10. UKRAINE:
SPECIFICITY OF DEFENSE
The construction of the Army and security services against which Russia used the
thermite tactics in 2010 – 2013
Restoration of the military history of Ukraine, traditions of the army
Decommunisation and overcoming the postcolonial syndrome
Developing and further support the independent Orthodox Church of Ukraine
To work on the growing part of Ukraine’s language in informational space
Limitation of Russian TV channels broadcasting, using Russian social media and search
engines
Struggle for energy independence
European and Euro-Atlantic integration as components of the victory in the hybrid war
11. UKRAINIAN CONCLUSIONS
Disruption and conquering of Ukraine is not the final goal of Russia
The main objective is the disruption of the European Union
Kremlin uses the democratic procedures in its interests very skillfully
Disputes with EU countries do not pose a military threat to Ukraine
The victory in hybrid warfare is possible only due to internal changes in
Ukraine
The fundamental purpose of Ukraine is to continue the Euro-Atlantic
integration
12. GENERAL INFERENCES
Hybrid warfare can be finished only with hybrid peace
Russia bets on the standard methods, which strengthens due to the speed
of information spread
Despair is the primary weapon of hybrid warfare
Civilised world does not have the instruments of the effective answer to this
Russian hybrid challenge.
Russian hybrid warfare threw Ukraine into a dilemma – to change or to
disappear