Reflection On The Bill Of Rights

Reflection On The Bill Of Rights
Journal entry #45: December 16, 1791 Yesterday the Bill of Rights was ratified and it is the talk of the country. I know many citizens, like myself,
and political figures are satisfied with this addition to the Constitution. Our president, George Washington, initially expressed in his inaugural
address his desire for a Bill of Rights that would display "a reverence for the characteristic rights of freemen and a regard for the public harmony..."
("Washington's Inaugural Address of 1789"). In my opinion, I feel the Bill of Rights successfully expresses the characteristics George Washington
described. This morning I was discussing the Bill of Rights with some fellow journalists, and we all agreed that we felt a sense of security knowing
our rights cannot be stripped by our government. Even though we agreed on this, I realized that we had extremely different views on which ones were
most important to us. All the amendments affect my life in a way, but some are more important to me than others. The First Amendment has provided
protection for my individual rights of speech, religion, assembly, press, and petition of government. In my opinion, the First Amendment is the most
important. As a journalist and successful newspaper writer, freedom of press and petition of government are rights that I cherish. I have many opinions
that include my view on our government and the Bill of Rights has allowed me to speak freely without any concerns. As a religious family man, the
right to
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Bill of Rights
Bill of Rights & Amendments Paper
Intro
The United States is a country that was founded on the principle of freedom; it took the Bill of Rights to be added to the Constitution to guarantee
citizens freedom. The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments in the constitution; a document that outlines how the new American
government would be created and operated. The Constitution was ratified in 1788 which was the start of protecting the interests of each citizen, two
years later the Bill of Rights was proposed by congress and went into effect in 1791. It was designed to prevent the government from taking total
power over citizens and to provide them with legal defenses. This essay will discuss the understanding of how...show more content...
However, it was not until "the Voting Rights of 1965 that aimed to overcome legal barriers at the state and local levels that denied blacks their right to
vote under the 15th amendment" (The 15th Amendment: Ratification, 2012). This had to happen because despite the amendment people were still
using discriminatory practices against the blacks. There is a difference between the earlier amendments and the later ones because many of the earlier
ones like the Bill of Rights were about civil liberties. The 19th through the 27th amendments dealt with political rights and technical issues. For
example one of these amendments granted women the right to vote and some clarified the succession to the presidency and vice presidency. The later
amendments work to increase political rights and to conform the details of our system of government. Conclusion
Our individual rights are the most traditional and valued accomplishment of the United States, there are other states that are not entitled to have such
rights. Each of the amendments are very important to how we live in today's society; the first ten which is the Bill of Rights grants Americans their
freedom. Our founding fathers had a vision on what they wanted America to become they laid the foundation for the constitution and allowed
modification if necessary they knew that America would grow and the constitution would need adjustments; that is exactly what

Essay about Bill of Rights
In 1791, the Bill of Rights, consisting of 10 amendments, was ratified into the constitution. The document's purpose was to spell out the liberties of the
people that the government could not infringe upon. Considered necessary by many at the time of its development, the Bill of Rights became the cause
for a huge debate between two different factions: The Federalists and the Anti–Federalists. The Federalists were those who thought that there should be
a new Union created with a strong centralized government and individual regional governments. They felt that it was not necessary for there to be a bill
of rights because it was implied that those rights the Constitution did not specifically state would be handed down to the states. On the...show more
content...
To provide a few examples, one must take a closer look at some of these amendments. The First Amendment to the Constitution dictates that
"Congress shall make no law," which establishes a national religion, prohibits free speech or press, or which prevents the right to assemble or
petition the government. In the language used, it expressly prohibits the legislative branch from making laws which would impose on the rights that
were given to the people. According to Hugo Black, "The Framers were well aware that the individual rights they sought to protect might be easily
nullified if subordinated to the general powers granted to Congress. One of the reasons for adoption of the Bill of Rights was to prevent just that
(Black 1960)." The Third Amendment states that the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure "shall not be infringed." Again, this
amendment is laying down restrictions on what government has power to do. Amendment Six provides the right to a "speedy and public trial, by an
impartial jury," to be "informed of the nature and cause of the accusation," and "to have compulsory process for obtaining Witnesses in his favor, and
to have Assistance of Counsel for his defense." This amendment states that if you are accused of a crime, you must have certain rights reserved which

Why Is The Bill Of Rights Necessary
In my opinion the Bill of Rights was necessary in order to protect American people's rights in general and also for political reasons. Therefore, thanks
to the Bill of Rights, people have the liberty to express themselves in a freely manner; and the government cannot take that privilege away since there
is a guarantee of such freedom written in the Bill of Rights. However, the Bill of Rights is also beneficial in terms for political reasons since after the
constitution was proposed there were many people who opposed to it. For example, the Federalist that felt that the constitution abundantly empowered
the federal government; thus, wanted the constitution ratified. Nevertheless, when the constitution was ratified the Federalist promised to

The Bill of Rights Essay
Bill of Rights
We live in the 21st century, where most Americans mind their own business but take for granted our God given rights. Not only God given rights but
also those established by our founding forefathers. This paper will illustrate and depict the importance of the original problems faced when adopting
the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It will discuss the importance of the first amendment, the due process of the 4th, 5th, 6th, and the 8th
amendments. Last but not least the importance of what is known as the "second Bill of Rights" (14th amendment). What problems with the original
document motivated the adoption of the Bill of Rights?
Many felt the Constitution was strongly focused on the power and authority the central...show more content...
Thus Congress included the Bill of Rights and Federalist and Anti–Federalist came to a compromise and the Constitution came to be. Give one example
of each of the five rights in the First Amendment. Freedom of religion: A great example of freedom of religion is that fact that central government
or the state that someone might live in, cannot impose a said religion or prosecute for worshiping the religion of choice of an individual. Freedom
of speech: The freedom to speak freely and without censorship and limitation. A great example of this would be a talk radio, where people call in to
voice opinion on real time political controversy. Right to assembly: The right to form groups, to organize and to assemble together to address issues
of a common goal. The ability to organize is an important means by which citizens can influence their governments and leaders ("Freedom of
assembly and association", N.D.). Right to petition: The right to present request to the government without punishment or reprisal. A great example is
picketing and peaceful protest. Keep in mind a violent protest is against the law and you will be arrested and prosecuted for such actions. Right to
press: "Our liberty cannot be guarded but by the freedom of the press, nor that be limited without danger of losing it." Thomas Jefferson to John Jay,
1786. (Coates, 1995–99). Go to the "First Amendment Center" web site and pick a related court case for one or two

Bill Of Rights Essay
The Bill of Rights is, perhaps, the most important, meaningful, and controversial part of the United States Constitution. The document is one of most
influential of its kind in the history of the country. A disagreement between the Federalists and Anti
–federalists brought the first ten amendments to the
forefront all at once, making the constitution, as a whole, able to be agreed upon. As an American, each of the ten amendments is of varying
importance to the individual citizen. Subjective as it is to rank the Bill of Rights from most important to least important, ranking can shed some light on
the importance of the document to Americans from then, now and even into the future. For a long time in the history of the United States of America the
Bill of Rights was in the background and provided little controversy for the young country. Starting in the 20th century, though, the political document
has come under intense scrutiny on how to be interpreted correctly by scholars, politicians, and even normal citizens (Schwartz 13). The clarity...show
more content...
There are five main parts to this amendment that make it the most important. It prohibits the making of any laws that might confine religion, freedom
of speech, freedom of the press, right to peaceably assemble, or the right to petition government (Levy 40). There is a lot to take apart in this bill,
granting it much of its gravity. Furthermore, there is much ambiguity here for what exactly the definition of "religion" might be in the wording or
"speech" or "press" (Bodehhamer 23). The ambiguity has led to many supreme court cases having to define the reach of this amendment and how it
should be interpreted (24). This amendment has all the basics of what the forefathers were aiming for in a free society, despite the ambiguity. The root
of the rest of the Bill of Rights stems from this one, which makes it the most important of the

Bill of Rights Essay
The "Bill of rights" had been proposed as a follow up to Parliament's original Habeas Corpus bill, which safeguarded personal freedom and liberty.
Now just about every colony had a bill of rights, so James Madison suggested that if the United States was to survived as a a country it would need
to have a set of rules versus thirtheen and every state would have the same rules. In 1789, James Madison proposed a series of legislative articles to
the first United States congress, but the processes took a while; Madison proposed twelve but only ten became known as the "Bill of Rights" in
December 15, 1791. Brant gives a summary of how these amendments proposed by James Madison, would be added quickly to the Constitution: The
first ten...show more content...
Bill of Rights with its earlier analogue, noting that even in the colonial period Americans had progressed far beyond the English in securing their
rights....The English "Bill of Rights," its exalted name notwithstanding, had a narrow range of protections, including the freedom of petition, free
speech for members of Parliament, and, in language closely followed by the American Eighth Amendment, bans on excessive bail, excessive fines,
and cruel and unusual punishments. As an antecedent of the American Bill of Rights, the English one was a skimpy affair, though important as a
symbol of the rule of law and of fundamental law. (Levy 5). But it is important to realize the the English "Bill of Rights" had been proposed as a sort
of follow–up to Parliament's original Habeas Corpus bill, which safeguarded personal freedom and liberty. Although Habeas Corpus still serves as the
legal bedrock of the freedom but left to one's judgment or choice in the lives of individuals by the state, it falls far short of the extraordinary number of
counts of liberties that would comprise the Constitution's first ten amendments. Madison's proposals would compensate for the "skimpy" character that
Levy attributes to these existing provisions, from which the American authors of the Constitution derived little more than the name and the

English Bill Of Rights
The Bill of Rights is a formal declaration of the legal and civil rights of the citizens. Also known as the first ten amendments of the constitution,
ratified in 1791 and offering freedoms like speech, assembly, and worship. Originally, the Bill of Rights were proposed by James Madison and they
then became the law of the land. The purpose of the Bill of Rights was a statement of basic individual freedoms that refrain from the English Bill of
Rights passed in 1689. A century later, 7 out of the 13 of the newly independentUnited States of America adopted a bill of rights as an addition to their
state constitutions, the other 6 states continued using the English bill of rights in the bodies of their constitutions. Virginia is historically known

Essay On English Bill Of Rights
Did you know the U.S constitution and the English Bill of Rights are over 200 years old! The U.S Constitution is a document that states how the
government works and its fundamental laws. The English Bill of Rights is the British law, that declared the rights and liberties of the people. Both
documents protect the rights of its citizens. In the U.S constitution there are 27 amendments and in the English Bill of Rights there are 13 articles.
Both documents have similar laws but is worded differently. Article six of the English Bill of Rights states, "That the raising or keeping a standing
army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law." In other words, keeping or raising an army in the
kingdom without the approval of the Parliament is against the Law. This article can also be found in the U.S Bill of Rights, amendment three. Which
states that...show more content...
Which can also be found in the U.S Bill of rights amendment eight. Which states, "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." Both Amendment eight and Article 10 have the same meanings, but the words are switched up. The
English Bill of Rights and the US Bill of Rights are very important because both documents protect the rights of its citizens! Both documents, English
Bill of Rights and the U.S Constitution have similar laws, but is worded differently. The laws of both documents can relate with how they give legal
protection for individual rights and its citizens. Although the U.S Constitution has 27 amendments, the first 10 amendments are known as the U.S Bill
of Rights. It's amazing how both the US Bill of Rights and the English Bill of Rights share similar laws and have similar

Bill Of Rights
The pursuit for liberty marked the birth of an acute conflict that developed and intensified in the 18th Century. War cries and the blood of brave men
were a continuous epidemic that plagued the hopeful prayers of confined men and women. Nearly a decade has passed since the outbreak of the
American Revolution, terminating this awful chapter of human history and revealing the commencement of a new nation–America. This time,
democracy, not an oppressive dictatorship, will fuel the national government. The Bill ofRights was ratified in 1791, granting American citizens the
opportunity to exercise their fundamental rights. Of these, freedom of press, religion, and petition are of the greatest importance, as they form the basis
of a strong...show more content...
Great Britain's refusal to answer the people's continuous petitions gave way to a developing tension between the colonists and the British monarch. For
example, the Declaration of Independence also states that "our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury..." The public aroused in
rage at the thought, occasionally rioting against the British military while demanding for unalienable rights. The king of the Great Britain, however,
responded by persecuting those who rebelled against the national government and taking away more rights from the people. The England's Bill of
Rights was an early testimony written in the 1600s that exemplified the importance of the freedom to petition. The document states that "...it is the
right of the subjects to petition the king, and all... prosecutions for such petitioning is illegal." This statement reflects the public's opinion on petitioning
and opposes Britain's cruel punishments in response to such

Introduction
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution: an amendment that guarantees three rights, one of which is the right to freedom of
expression. Under this, there resides the freedom of press. It assures that people are free to communicate through the means of media and dissemination
without governmental restraints. However, if the government desires to interfere in one's expression, the government can do so, but only with proper
justification. In such cases, a court case is necessary ("First Amendment"). One such case is New York Times Co. v.United States. In favor of the
publications made by the Times that had caused concern for the U.S. government, the final verdict was right in heeding the First Amendment, for the
...show more content...
v. United States would ensue.
The main question that probably arose was whether the president's executive order surpassed the First Amendment. First, the District Court for the
Southern District of New York judged the Times case and decided the government had not "show[ed] justification for the enforcement of such a [prior]
restraint," for it simply deemed the publication of the Pentagon Papers detrimental to the nation. Likewise, the District Court for the D.C. and the Court
of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the courts that judged the Washington Post case, came to the same verdict (New York Times Co. v. United States).
The Case: The Result* The Supreme Court case was argued on June 26, 1971 and decided on June 30, 1971. It affirmed the verdicts of the District
Court for the Southern District of New York & the District Court for D.C. and the Court of Appeals for the D.C. (New York Times Co. v. United States).
The Supreme Court's decision was supported by three main reasons. In addition to the fact that President Nixon made the restraint order without proper
justification, Justices Black, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, and Marshall, the ones who concurred with the official judgement, hesitated to take
action without the Congress's tutelage. They thought that the issues were strictly legislative, so they did not refute the First Amendment (New York
Times Co. v. United States; "The Espionage Statutes and Publication of Defense Information"). Also, per US Code–

Argumentative Essay: The Bill Of Rights
The freedoms outlined in the Bill of Rights are sill significant today, and thanks to them the American citizens have a right to speak out freely,
assemble in a peaceful manner, or to get a speedy and more importantly fair trial. In my opinion, this document and its heritage has been incorporated
into the United States in a way to ensure the strength of its character. Undeniably, the ideals represented in the Bill of Rights were introduced to serve
as the country's foundation. I believe that people all over the world, putting aside their abode, race, gender, sexuality, or ethnicity should be entitled to
the exact same rights. Nobody can argue with the fact that we are born equal, only our living circumstances differ. However, this does not

Essay on The Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights is a list of limitations on the power of the government. Firstly, the Bill of Rights is successful in assuring the adoption of the
Constitution. Secondly, the Bill of Rights did not address every foreseeable situation. Thirdly, the Bill of Rights has assured the safety of the people of
the nation. Successes, failures, and consequences are what made the Bill of Rights what they are today. Firstly, the Bill of Rights has guaranteed the
adoption of the Constitution. James Madison proposed the Bill of Rights to the First Federal Congress on June 8, 1789 (Primary Documents 1). The
First Federal Congress then proposed the twelve amendments to the constitution to the state legislatures (Constitutional Politics in Ohio 1). The...show
more content...
An agreement was finally made to create the Bill of Rights to help secure ratification of the Constitution itself. Secondly, the Bill of Rights did not
address every foreseeable situation. One failure of the Bill of Rights was the first amendment of the original Bill of Rights. The amendment concerned
the number of constituents for each Representative and was never ratified. It said that once the House has one hundred members, it should not go
below one hundred, and once it reached two hundred, it should not go below two hundred (Mount 1). Another failure was The Anti–Title Amendment.
This amendment said that any citizen who accepted or received any title of nobility from a foreign power, or who accepted without the consent of
Congress any gift from a foreign power, by would no longer be a citizen (Mount 1). Basically, this said that if someone received or accepted something
from a foreign power, that person would no longer be a citizen. The Anti–Title Amendment was submitted to the States in 1810 and was ratified by only
twelve states, the last being in 1812 (Mount 1). Thirty–eight states are required to ratify to add an amendment. The Slavery Amendment was another
failure of the Bill of Rights. This amendment was not ratified because the House did not want any amendment to be made to the Constitution which
would authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any state, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of

What Is The Bill Of Rights Essay
Civil Disobedience was a term coined by Henry David Thoreau meaning that a certain person disobeys certain laws, demands, and commands of a
government. Not necessarily all the government laws, but certain ones that may affiliate with their beliefs or world view. Some people in the world
abuse the right and just make the world a more complicated place. Then there's some people who use it for the right purpose and get accused for
doing wrong. Yet I am not the one to judge what the world does right and does wrong. ButCivil Disobedience is a right that should be used wisely. For
example, Rosa Parks refused to move from her seat on the bus because she believed that all people should have the same right. We each have the...show
more content...
Not everyone understands it. Some people do understand what the meaning and purpose of it is. And I believe that there should be more people
like that today. Because knowledge like that shouldn't be abused. Yes. Everyone has rights. Everyone has a choice. Everyone has the free will to
make decisions of what's right and what is wrong. Of course peaceful resistance has a positive and negative impact on society. But people should
keep in mind of what they do. Their choices to act on what they believe is up to them. If you want to prove a point, prove it. It seems like everyone
just adds more fuel to the flame than you need to. Real word problems are big enough. There is no need to make it bigger. I really wish people
knew when to resist and when to speak. Sometimes people get those two mixed up. There is a lot of false accusations and false motivation for
some peoples actions. For example, when someone feels like they should kill someone because they feel like they have the right is completely
wrong. Unless it is in defense. Which in some cases, can be mistaken. I feel like the question if peaceful resistance is has a positive or negative
impact is not the best. Of course it does. You just have to know when the right time to speak is and when the right time to act

Bill Of Rights Essay
A democratic country is the country governed directly or indirectly by people who have their sovereignty, so it has the laws to protect citizens' rights.
Most countries in the world adopt democracy, and so do the United States and South Korea. However, it doesn't mean that both countries' laws are
same. This essay will cover Bill of Rights and Korean Constitution because they are the fundamental laws of each country. Also, theUnited States has
federal system unlike Korea, which means each state has their own autonomies under their laws. The Bill of Rights indicates the first edition of ten
amendments for protecting the citizens' rights from the government. There are some similar and different points between the United States and South
Korea...show more content...
Firstly, the Second Amendment is about right for having arms and army. However, there is no Article in Korean Constitution about it and it is
illegal. Secondly, the Third Amendment is about protection from quartering of armies, but this also doesn't exist in Korean Constitution. Thirdly,
the Seventh Amendment is about civil trial by jury, and laws related to this point don't exist in Korea. However, there is a noticeable point in
Korea, which is called Civil Participation in Criminal Trials. It has been enforced since 2008 and is same with the United States in terms of having
juries, but there are two crucial differences. In Korea, jury can only participate in severe criminal cases and their verdicts have no legal binding
forces, just advisory effects. Fourthly, the Ninth Amendment is about protection of rights not specified in the Bill of Rights, and Korea does not
have laws involving this aspect naturally because the Korean Government does not adopt the Bill of Rights. Lastly, the Tenth Amendment is about
the powers of states and people, but this point is vague. The concept of powers of people can be applied to both United States and Korea, but the
concept of powers of state can't because the Korean Government does not have a federal system. Therefore, in this essay, it is categorized as
difference, but some people can regard it as same

English Bill Of Rights Essay
Not to be confused with the American Bill of Rights, the English Bill of Rights was written in 1689. What they really were was an act declaring the
rights and liberties of the subject and settling the succession of the crown. Like the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights is a basic and fundamental
document of the constitution law in England. The reason for the bill of rights was to ensure and guarantee the safety of the human rights that the citizens
were ought to have. The bill of rights reduced the power the monarch had on the civilians, and gave the civilians more power towards the monarchs.
The English Bill of Rights came after the defeat of King James II and the crowning of William III and Mary as the new joint rulers of England. Some
of these rights included the rights to bear arms, the rights to...show more content...
The citizens have full control of who is appointed to any position regarding the government. And if so it happens that the people don't like the way
they are being governed, then by law, they can petition the people in power off power.
The Bill of Rights hasn't only had a positive effect on England, but they also influenced other countries to create Bill of Rights of their own. The
Kingdom of Scotland also had a similar document written in 1689, United States of America also has a similar concept of the Bill of Rights. Its
influence can also be seen in the United Nations Declaration of Human rights and the European Convention on Human rights. All of these countries
had a similar problem, too much power belonging to one person without the system of checks and balances.
The Bill of rights were intended not only to ensure basic human rights to the Englishmen, but to also limit the power that the monarch had on the
people. The Englishmen had already learned a lot from the previous kings, and they knew a constitutional document was needed to save the people
from an absolute

Bill Of Rights Essay Outline
What is the Bill of Rights? The Bill of Rights is how we primarily know and call the first ten amendments of the constitution. They were mainly written
by James Madison, a Virginian man and antifederalist who later became president of the United States. They are the core rights and privileges, that we,
Americans possess and sometimes take for granted. Why does the U.S. Constitution have it? The Constitution was written by our founding fathers'; it
addressed the structure of the government but provided limited rights to individual liberties. The anti–federalists were not happy with the outcome so
they ratified the constitution and asked for amendments to be included. Furthermore, the Bill of Rights was created and is predominantly the

The Bill of Rights Essay
In the development process of America, its sound that legislative system has a very solid foundation for the construction of American society. The Bill
of Rights as one of the successful act in America, its importance position has never been ignored. The Bill of Rights was introduced by James Madison
and came into effect on December 15, 1791. It has given the powerful support for the improvements of American society. The Bill of Rights has become
an essential part in guaranteeing the further development of culture. The influence of The Bill of Rights can be easily found in its cultural
revolutionizing. It can not only guarantee the harmonious relationship among all the walk of society, but can also promote the construction of
harmonious...show more content...
The Bill of Rights not only enhanced the timely and validity of news communication, but also played a unique role in the reporting of the
important news events and fully satisfying people's need for information. It has become a common practice for the online media to make live
broadcasts of the Stakeholders Congresses. The role of The Bill of Rights in supervision is giving full play. The Bill of Rights has actively created
conditions for civilian to supervise the government, and attaches great importance to the role of the poor group in supervision. Civilians at all
levels are required to investigate and resolve in a timely manner all problems reported to the government by civilian via the The Bill of Rights, and
to inform civilian of the results. On the great majority of government websites, relevant email addresses and telephone numbers are made public, so
that civilians can be informed of problems by the hardworking of The Bill of Rights. In order to strength civilian's reporting of corrupt and
degenerate officials, the central discipline inspection and supervision authorities and other relevant bodies have set up informant websites. "Over 60
percent of civilians have a positive opinion to the role of The Bill of Rights in supervision, and consider it an expression of government's socialist
democracy and progress"(The Constitution and the Bill of Rights, p153). The Bill of

Essay On Bill Of Rights
Ever since man walked on this Earth they have had rights and responsibilities. Over thousands of years the principles of life have not changed.
Everyone still has their rights and their responsibilities for the Earth and their country. While individual beliefs in what a responsibility for the nation is
there are commonly shared thoughts. In America immigrants and lifelong citizens have numerous rights and responsibilities toward this country. The
United States of America has had basic standards for civilians since the Bill of Rights was adopted in 1791. After the Bill of Rights was adopted
citizens had something to fight for and defend. The Bill of Rights consisted of ten amendments that listed off guidelines for each citizen to use and
follow. With the ratification of the Bill of Rights the debate of responsibilities of citizens sparked. The main responsibility shared by an American
citizen is to defend the Constitution. Over the years many cases have come up where we have needed to defend the Constitution. When people are
defending the Constitution, they look to one or more of the twenty–seven amendments and what laws may or may not be violated. The first ten
amendments of the Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights pertain to the personal rights of how people should be treated in
most situations. These amendments...show more content...
In the past there have been numerous cases where the government has required land for different reasons. In Amendment V this legal matter is
discussed, ... "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." This states that as long as the government pays you what
the property value is worth or more than what it is worth and there is a just reason it can be classified as constitutional. In many cases as well as land
there have been debates on the taxes that are paid by the

Reflection On The Bill Of Rights

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Reflection On The Bill Of Rights