Argumentative Essay On Cloning

Argumentative Essay On Cloning
The concept or idea behind cloning has been a controversial topic since it was introduced in the late 19th century. Although this concept did not come to
life until 1996 when the first animal was cloned ethical debates where already in the works. These debates highlighted issues like public policy, human
rights, and loss of uniqueness. Scientist, Religious organization and International Governments ethically the argued both the consequences and the
benefits that derive from this situation. Part of the science community as well as Religious organizations argues against cloning as it is ethically wrong
as this discovery was not God's intent when creating life. Whereas the other part of the science community, as well as international government
institutions, argue that cloning is beneficial to the advancement of humanity. In retrospect, religious organizations argument could be supported by
both Natural Law ethics and Divine Law of Command. Where Government institution claim for a progression in society is supported by Cultural
relativism and evolutionary ethics.
To further develop these arguments, it is essential to define not only what cloning is as well as the cloning process itself. Cloning is defined as
making an exact copy of an organism whether it be human or animals. The cloning process itself first starts off by harvesting an egg from a donor
which will have its DNA removed. Another egg cell's DNA is then removed from the second donor, after the empty egg cell and
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Persuasive Essay On Cloning
The thought of cloning human beings can be exciting for some but scary for others. Some people find cloning to be one the most spectacular
invention while others think it is not a great idea to clone themselves. Another issue here is that some people feel that we if we are cloning human
beings, we will be taking the role of God. What exactly does this means? Well, people who have a religious background feel that this can be stepping
out of religion boundaries because it's scientists that will be involved in the process instead of God and this is not done naturally. People have viewed
cloning is just making another human being but what about artificial insemination? "Artificial insemination have been used to create children who
would not have existed without help or interference of modern science"...show more content...
But without this method a lot of women and men will not be able to have a family because of medical issues. Just like anything else that is unnatural
such as antibiotics, vaccinations, surgery, hair dye, people who are not against it feel that those who are should object to these things. Most people
think that we don't know how our child will turn out and what qualities they will have. But this is not so true anymore. Those who are creating a
child through sexual intercourse can actually find out now certain qualities of their future children. And with the IVF technology, it makes it possible
which embryo to implant after the DNA analysis is performed. "It is even possible, with preimplantation diagnosis (PID) to implant one identical
twin and freeze the other future use" (Anderson). We also are not able to predict everything that will happen with the person that is created.
Predictions can be made but it is not possible to know exactly what will happen. There was a poll that was taken by CNN, about 7% Americans
wanted to cloned. Therefore, there are people still not agreeing with

Essay on Cloning
It all started back in the fifties when James Watson and Francis Crick discovered the structure of DNA (D'Souza NA). Ever since there has been talk
of human and animal cloning. It all seemed out of reach and basically impossible, but in 1997 that all changed when a sheep, named Dolly, was the first
ever mammal to be cloned. She was cloned for the purpose of curing disease and research on animal organs for human transplantation (Schaeffer 3).
Now that scientists know that it is possible to clone literally anything with DNA, the world has become a rather scary place.
This raises the...show more content...
"The subject of animal cloning has provoked debate about the ethics of interfering with nature as well as about the danger of using laboratory means to
accomplish what habitat preservation and other conservation measures cannot" (Gugliotta A3). Now there is talk that they are going to start cloning
animals that have been extinct from ten to thousands of years ago. Scientists are contemplating the possibility of cloning a 20,000–year–old woolly
mammoth from a block of ice in northern Siberia and are planning to use an elephant for it is surrogate mother (Gugliotta A3). This is just crazy, I
don't think that I need to remind every one of the movie Jurassic Park. Do we want to move into a world of genetically engineered animals? I
definitely do not; these animals became extinct for a reason and who are we to say that it is time for them to roam to earth again?
Another type of cloning that is now being investigated is the use of biotechnology to help infertile couples have children. Even "Ian Wilmut, the
scientist who cloned Dolly and has come out publicly against human cloning, was not trying to help sheep have genetically related children"(Thomas
47). This technique to impregnate infertile couples is basically the same that they are using on the animals. First an egg is removed from a woman and
all of its genetics are then stripped. Then the cells from the donor are

Cloning Essay example
Cloning
Abstract
The question to clone or not to clone is currently center stage of scientific debate. Since the birth of Dolly, the sheep, in 1997 the controversial question
of cloning has been paramount throughout the entire globe. The question is no longer whether it can be done, but whether is should be done and to
what extent. We have already cloned goats, mice, monkeys, cattle, and pigs (Cloning fact sheet). Scientists are now trying to get approval to clone
humans or at least parts of them (Eccleston, CNN). All of these clonings have led to much criticism and controversy, but the latest attempt at cloning is
that of endangered and possibly already extinct species in hopes of preserving them. This short paper...show more content...
In the case of this next example, 692 embryos were cloned, of those only 81 grew sufficiently to implant, of those 42 were implanted into 32 cows,
but only eight cows actually became pregnant (Lanza, R., Dresser, B., Damiani, P. 2000). Most of the cows had spontaneous abortions and one had a
very late–term abortion. These low statistics led to only one cow making it to full term so far (Lanza, R., Dresser, B., Damiani, P. 2000).
What does this have to do with endangered species?
Next month, November 2000, the first cloned, endangered species is scheduled to be born. Noah, as he has already been named, is a gaur: a large
ox–like animal from India with a current population of only about 36,000 left in the wild (Lanza, R., Dresser, B., Damiani, P. 2000). The reasoning
behind cloning endangered species according to scientists at Advanced Cell Technology (ACT), is ultimately the preservation of their gene pool and
propagation of these animals until their natural habitats can be restored, at which point they could be reintroduced back into the wild (Lanza, R.,
Dresser, B., Damiani, P. 2000). The interesting thing about what scientists at ACT are doing, is that they are not cloning the genes of one species and
introducing them into the same species, they are transferring the gene carrying eggs into another species entirely. Noah, the gaur, will be brought into
this world

Cloning Speech : Cloning And Cloning
Prisila Monrroy
Mr Bonnet
Communications Arts
24 April 2015
Cloning speech
Suppose that every prospective parent in the world stopped having children naturally, and instead produced clones of themselves. What would the
world be like in another 20 or 30 years? The answer is: much like today.Cloning would only copy the genetic aspects of people who are already here
said by Nathan Myhrvold.
Cloning is an issue now and will be in the in the future,animals are cloned all the time.Does the human race want to have a copy of itself. We need to
understand what is happening to the cloned animals and what could possibly happen to us if we were to be cloned.
Cloning has been around for years from 1938 by Hans Spemann to 1997 when Dolly the cloned sheep was made. Why should we care that cloning is
bad? Cloning can have many complications before in the womb, during, and after. Why should we take those risks? The cost of cloning is obviously
not a what an average Joe makes.
There are three types of ways to produce a clone first one is gene cloning and that creates a copy of the genes or parts of DNA. Reproductive cloning
makes a copy of whole animals. Then Therapeutic makes embryonic stem cells. The most used is therapeutic cloning.
Some countries like Brazil are discussing if cloning can save endangered species.In 2009 the Brazilian Agricultural Research. Is freezing blood, sperm
and umbilical cord cells from animals of roadkill and some other type of

Human Cloning Essay
Imagine a future where humans are manufactured, a future where humans are created by science, a future where humans are the new lab specimen.
Human cloning is like opening Pandora's Box, unleashing a torrent of potential evils but at the same time bringing a small seed of hope. No matter
how many potential medical and scientific benefits could be made possible by human cloning, it is unethical to clone humans. Before the ethics of
human cloning can be discussed, the mechanics of cloning must be understood first. Cloning is the process of making an exact genetic copy of an
organism by a method called nuclear transplantation which is a process of removing a nucleus (the center of a cell which contains all of the biological
information)...show more content...
Human cloning is not always copying and creating a full organism; that is reproductive cloning. Cloning just an organ or tissue is called therapeutic
cloning, and is a technology that is not possible yet but scientists feel that it is only a matter of time (Tierney). With that technology, many patients
could be cured of previously life–long conditions such as paralysis, chronic heart attacks, and leukemia. A long–term "disease" such as infertility could
be cured as well by creating a clone of the female and then transplanting that clone's eggs into the female and then the children the couple has will be
their biological children! Even amputees could have limbs regenerated in a lab and reattached (Smith). These medical advances seem like a cure–all,
but they are not possible at the moment because we do not know enough about the human genome to see which genes code for certain proteins which
shape the function of the cell. With our current technology, we cannot direct a cell to specialize into a kidney cell to transplant into a patient needing
a new kidney. Current technology doesn't allow for the creation of "spare parts" but it is possible to create fully functional humans (after many
attempts), and then the human that was "created" could then be grown and disemboweled for "spare parts" (Dudley 30). The idea of creating a
"Caliban" or a human specifically to act

Essay about The Pros and Cons of Cloning
A clone is a cell, group of cells, or an organism that has descended from an ancestor without sexual reproduction. Humans have found cloning to be
valuable and productive. For example, Agricultural scientists use embryo cloning to boost the number of offspring from farm animals. They hope to
use cloning as to increase the number of offspring from animals with desired traits, such as lean meat or above–average milk production. Research
biologists also use the technique of cloning to study how animals develop during the early stages of life. Humans find interest in cloning because it can
be used as medical treatment, such as for couples who have difficulty conceiving a child. This problem may pardon from several conditions,...show
more content...
Researchers have only been successful in cloning using whole nuclei. Therefore, in order to clone dinosaurs, you need its nucleus, not just DNA. As
well, to find success in cloning you need an egg cell that is very closely related to the donor nucleus. But another problem is that the dinosaur eggs of
millions of years ago may have changed greatly with the eggs of modern birds and reptiles. Therefore these ancient genes might not be able to even
function properly. Another problem is that the eggs of modern reptiles and birds usually tend to be large so they cannot always be easily enucleated.
Researchers have found success in cloning amphibians but find it much more difficult when it comes to cloning mammals. One of the problems is the
fact that amphibian eggs are larger than mammal eggs. Eggs that come from mammals are also enclosed in a tough membrane, called the zona
pellucida. This tough membrane holds the cells of the young embryo together. In order to remove the nucleus, it is done through a process called
surgical aspiration, and the nucleus is sucked through a micropipette with a sharpened tip. Another problem with cloning mammals is that in order for
the fertilized eggs to develop, they need to be implanted in an adult female's uterus. As a result, a cloned embryo requires a foster mother. By 1933,
scientists had cloned five different species of mammals, which include cows, mice, pigs, rabbits, and

Cloning Essay examples
Cloning
Scientific experimentation has led us to many great discoveries such as: Chemotherapy, heart surgery, and bone marrow transplants. Recently scientists
have discovered a new way to heal humans. This is known as cloning. Although they have yet to clone a human they have cloned sheep.Cloning has
brought up a huge controversy among the American people. There are two sides to the story. Either you agree with cloning or you don't. The only
way to help make that decision is to look at the good and bad points of cloning. There are many positive aspects of human and non–human cloning.
Human cloning technology could be used to reverse the number one killer in the United States, heart attacks. Scientists believe that they...show more
content...
By combining this technology with human cloning technology it may be possible to produce needed tissue for suffering people that will be free
of rejection by their immune systems. Conditions such as Alzheimer's disease Parkinson's disease, diabetes, heart failure, and other problems may
be made curable by human cloning. ("Cloning to Save Lives") Now there are also some ways that we are playing god through cloning. For
example, infertile parents could easily have a baby cloned using their DNA and women that are at high risk for Down's syndrome can avoid that
risk by cloning. Even though this sounds great we are basically changing reproduction, as we have always known it to be. There are also many
negative aspects of cloning. To create different organs or limbs in order to help a person to live longer or more comfortably seems to go against
nature. The way human life should be created is through sexual intercourse. Harmond Varmus, a schoolteacher, said it best; "Human cloning
represents a grave attack on the dignity of conception and on the right an unrepeatable, unpredetermined set of genes." To clone an animal is almost
the same thing. We are playing with the way humans and animals have reproduced for years. Is it fair that we clone and then kill an animal just for its
organs in order to save a person's life? Scientists are not even sure that the animal's organs will be compatible with the human body. According to the
Medical Research

Cloning Essay
Cloning
For hundreds of years man has wondered what it would be like to clone human beings. With the idea of cloning comes many different opinions and
positions. The idea of creating an army of "super humans" has long been a dream of many people. Others have feared what would happen to the world if
cloning were possible and if cloning is morally correct. Overall, religion and ethics play a vital role in the both of these viewpoints and greatly effect
many positions on the topic of cloning. In February of 1997 Dr. Ian Wilmut, a 52–year–old embryologist at the Roslin Institute in dinburgh announced
the cloning of a lamb named Dolly 1. He had replaced the genetic material of sheep's egg with the DNA...show more content...
Many individuals also stated that now that the technology is available, its use is inevitable. Randolfe Wicker, a New York businessperson, founded
the Clone Rights United Front after reports of the successful cloning. His goals are to continue to push for more research and to defend people's
rights.3 These examples show the rights of the individual, but ironically many people who fight for the rights of individuals, form groups to do so. In
his Tuesday, February 25, 1997 article 'Should We Fear Dolly?' James K. Glassman, a writer for the Washington post discusses his favorable views on
cloning. He points out that cloning is something that could someday be used for treatment to cure human diseases, and the ability to produce organs for
transplanting as benefits for all of society. Also, he points out that while cloning people is against the law in other countries, it is not in the United
States. He said, "I don't think it should be –– certainly not at this stage . . . Trying to stop intellectual progress, in any form, is a terrible mistake.
Furthermore, the technology is not, in principle, policeable. In other words, you couldn't really stop research on human cloning if you wanted to." 4
Most of the scientific community favors the cloning of animals. Many, including Dr. Wilmut, argue that the potential for medical and

Cloning Essay
Cloning
In recent years, the issue of cloning has been up for debate worldwide. Cloning is the production of one or more individual plants or animals that are
genetically identical to another plant or animal. There are two different types of cloning procedures, embryo cloning and adult DNAcloning. Embryo
cloning occurs when sperm and egg cells are mixed in a glass dish. After conception, the zygote (fertilized egg) is allowed to divide and nutrients are
added to promote cell division. The cells then fuse with an ovum which has the nucleus removed. Adult DNA cloning is taking cells from mammary
tissue from an adult. Cloning can have many good results to help humans, but others argue that it is wrong because it is immoral....show more content...
Scientists are researching by splitting embryos to execute experiments to find data relating to cell differentiation, the use of stem cells, and genetic
screening. Fertility clinics use this service to help couples when a mother or father has a genetic disorder. A fertility clinic will clone an embryo, then
test it for genetic disorders. If the embryo is tested negative for genetic disorders, then the fertility clinic implants a clone of that embryo. This should
guarantee that the child would not have any genetic disorders.
I view cloning with mixed feelings, but I agree strongly with cloning being right. I do not believe that cloning humans to make more humans is
right, but I do think cloning human organs to replace a defective gene is right. In England, scientists are heavily researching the embryo for stem
cells. Right now the British scientists can use early embryos to study specific problems such as infertility, congenital diseases, contraception and
prenatal diagnostics. Cloning good stem cells and using them for babies with these problems would prevent the diseases from ever happening. The
reason for using the stem cell is because the cell is so versatile. Stem cells are taken from human embryos and fetal tissue. The cell, when never used,
like in embryos, can be turned into nearly any cell type of the whole body. Scientists also expect that when using cloned embryos a person would
easily overcome the problem of

Benefits of Cloning Essay examples
Cloning is the process of making a genetically identical organism through the use of a DNA sample. After the first cloned sheep dolly was created,
many people were keen in knowing more about cloning and its benefit to society. Additionally, many of us want to know the pros and con the
disadvantages and possible risks it may have on society and mankind. Most importantly, there are three types of cloning, therapeutic, reproductive, and
embryonic cloning. These types of cloning are all ways of scientists trying to find ways to produce a living organism or organs.
Undoubtedly, cloning is a topic that raises many question when brought up within society. However we can't dismiss the fact that the process could
benefit the lives of human...show more content...
This is a form of therapeutic cloning in which scientists use embryo to grow human organs. Most importantly, it could be used to improve the quantity
and quality of our foods products. However, this form of cloning is actually destroying our human embryos, which initially causes many to wonder
whether this idea of cloning id worth it in the end.
Recently, there has been the idea of scientists trying to clone animals for food. Although products from cloned animals are more likely to be safe,
we still have to do a more comprehensive study to examine the safety of the foods. Mellon (2006) argued that "If consumers aren't going to be told if
their meat is from a clone, FDA has to be certain that meat is safe (para.2)". It's important that consumers know what is entering their body because if
the cloned products causes the consumer to get sick, then the consumer have the right to take any legal action against the FDA. In addition, just
because a cloned organism may appear normal, doesn't mean that it may not have any genetic defect; cause most of the time many cloned organisms
always seem to have a genetic defect that causes them to die at an early age.
Unquestionably, cloning is a good way for scientists to find new developing cells or genetically transform an organism. However, it could have an
enormous impact within our society. Many scientists are now starting to realize that cloning could lead to psychological harm upon

Argumentative Essay On Human Cloning
Human cloning is threatening our society. Yes it has benefits but with these benefits there's a risk. First and foremost i disagree with cloning because,
it hasn't developed yet and it can take a lot of tries before getting a human being to this earth. On the other hand, animals have been cloned since the
beginning of this technology. They have a 70% chance of being born safely but that is not the same for humans the percentage to clone a human is
20% to 40% which is not even past birth. There has been a lot of failure on cloning but maybe one day it will be perfected. But over the years "cloning
has increased at a more stable rate. This new "cloning technology can really wrong because, you're basically make a robot just in a human form
factor. One good thing about cloning is that they can clone certain organ cells and damaged tissue. But to do something like that it's 50,000 dollars
which only certain people can afford. That's why is not extremely common to hear someone say that they have cloned a tissue or an organ.
However cloning is not cheap it's expensive but is it worth it? Favorably, it all depends on what you would like to clone and does it have a value to
your day to day life. Supposing that you want to clone your dog or cat the estimated price is from 25,000 thousand dollars and it can reach higher
pricing. People who have the money to do these sort of things must have been with that pet for a long time and that pet means a lot to them.
However when you're cloning a pet yes they are going to have the same characteristics as the one who passed away. Although it won't feel the same
as having your original pet. In my opinion people are doing this because it's an outlet for them to forget how their pet and pretend like it's still there
with them. Part of these people don't even think on what they are doing because they are so inlove with their animals. They should really think about
cloning pets and them make a decision. But if it means a lot to them then they should do it at there own risk. Know in an article named "What happened
to cloning?" They are stating that back in the 2000's they thought of banning cloning but "politicians could not agree at what stage of development
cloning should be

Human Cloning
While we have the state of the art technologies and the result of a successful cloning of the infamous lamb known as Dolly, should we take the next
step and begin human cloning? If I were to carry the super DNA that scientists are wanting to explore in the lab, would I allow myself to be
duplicated? Absolutely not! Replicating a human is not only wrong on ethical grounds but also a threat to our existence! The biggest concern is how far
will humans attempt to control nature? Therefore, I do not believe that cloning should be allowed based on my teleological outlook.
Diversity diminishes, and the human population decreases. It shifts the process of natural evolution. For hundreds of generations, our ancestors
developed through a gradual process of changes from their ability to compete, survive, and reproduce. By hindering this process our specie will
suffer. The negative outcomes are far greater than the positives. Maybe cloning can and will allow for possible answers for diseases and cures,
however it still interferes with the natural order of life; the human life–cycle. We must put into consideration the time and money spent on the
experiment with the cloned lamb. After years of several failed attempts prior to creating Dolly, can we, as humans, walk with a clean conscious
knowing the amount of safety and harm caused toward a developing child–clone and those involved in the process (DNA holder, scientists, etc.)? This
paints a clear picture of how cloning a human will be far more difficult, dangerous, and unethical. As a mother, I strongly oppose of this idea due to
the consequences of how we, as a society will view these cloners, and how these cloners will affect my children's lives. Will my children lead a normal
life if they are deemed having a weak and undesirable DNA? Undoubtedly, a loss of individuality and diversity is created. Our genetic make–up is
what makes us unique. It gives an individual a sense of self and distinctiveness. Eventually, the population starts to lack uniqueness. Two people
wouldn't be sitting down having a conversation on their diverse backgrounds, rather everyone else will have almost the same thoughts and ideas. How
can a society grow and learn about all the

Cloning Persuasive Essay
What was once thought to be the content of fiction novels and comic books is now being fully explored and realized in the cutting edge world of
modern science. Scientists now possess the necessary capabilities and technology to make the process of human cloning a reality. While this is a
controversial and rather sensitive topic, cloning is an innovative practice that has the potential to vastly improve the lives of unlimited amounts of
people. Although cloning may prove to be a useful remedy for many of today's issues, there are those in the scientific and medical fields who remain
vehemently opposed to its practice. It is for this reason that lawmakers, scientists, and doctors around the world are currently locked in a fierce standoff
...show more content...
Individuals who are afflicted by these diseases die, often within their first four years of life. There is no viable reason why children should not have
the chance to lead full and happy lives, with the help of cloning technology that reality could be achieved. Those opposed to the practice of human
cloning argue that it is unnatural to create a living being for the sole purpose of study and science. This is really not the case at all; while some may
be asked to participate in experiments for the betterment of humanity they are not painful or impractical procedures and will only involve taking DNA
samples with little or no inconvenience inflicted upon the subject. Besides occasional testing, cloned humans would certainly be able to live normal
lives. The fact being that the only difference between them and a regular human is the sequence of their genetic code. Another supplementary
argument can be made on the topic of medical advancements made possible through the cloning process, mankind will be provided with organs and
cells with which human's lives will be saved. If a person needs an organ transplant the normal means of transplantation would involve the removal of
an organ from another person. This organ could be rejected and many complications could arise, often with deadly repercussions. Human cloning
would involve using the person's own cells that could be cloned to produce a healthy, normal organ for use in the person. Through this process, there
would be no

The first animal ever cloned was a sea urchin in the 1880's by German biologist, Hans Driesch. Today, 22 various animals have been clones. As the
years passed new discoveries were made and improved through extensive research improving the life expectancy of organisms. In fact, a main
controversial aspect of medicine that has blown minds is said to be cloning. Cloning is the process of creating a genetic duplicate of an organism. It is
divided into two branches: reproductive and therapeutic. Reproductive cloning creates an animal genetically identical to its donor, where it is then
placed back into the uterine environment for further development. Therapeutic cloning on the other hand is quite similar in the sense of formation.
However, the resulting cloned cells remain in a lab and are not to be inserted into a female uterus to be nurtured into a fetus. These cells are instead
used to treat and prevent diseases and conditions. Over time, scientists have put forth all their knowledge and research into creating their very first
fully cloned animal. But, until this day, "observers say that no reputable scientist is actively attempting to produce a human clone through reproductive
cloning." ("The Science of Cloning",1) This procedure remains to be an issue worldwide due to the harm it carries along to reach its beneficial goal.
Reproductive cloning is the suggested and most used technique by researchers, since it is the only method that is able to possibly fully clone an

Cloning has been a mystery that has puzzled the majority of scientists through many decades on how they could be able to achieve the impossible,
many have given up and thought of this action as an impossible accomplishment that may never become a reality of the world. Over the past recents
decade this impossible accomplishment is now becoming a reality to the world. "A clone is a genetically identical copy of an organism, and it may
be created asexually oe created in a lab. The three types of cloning consist of reproductive, gene, and therapeutic cloning" ("Cloning"). There have
been many attempts throughout the years of trying to produce a cloning until finally in 1979 the first reproductive animal clone was developed a
sheep named polly who was the clone of her surrogate mother dolly the sheep. Therapeutic, reproductive, and animal cloning should be implemented
more in the United States of America; because it will increase medical advancements in organ transplants, will give infertile parents a chance to
procreate, and will give scientists the chance to further cloning and acknowledgments of diseases. Therapeutic cloning is the use of cloning embryonic
stem cells to repair or replace damaged tissues and organs. This type of cloning can be used for many different types of diseases and organ transplants
through various options allowed by therapeutic cloning. First off, therapeutic cloning has the ability to duplicate same, healthy cells in damaged organs
and tissues

Is Cloning Good Or Harmful? Essay
They Have Been Here All Along
Cloning is not solely a big science–fiction thing like most people think it is. Cloning is real and is currently in use to this day and in various ways.
Cloning has made a big difference in the world but has not received its right to fame due to the well–known rumors about it or overstated few odd facts
about it. However, cloning is used in more ways than most people think or imagine. There are many small things that are being made in the world by
cloning and the world is better due to its use. Cloning is extremely helpful and it is used to make medicine, it has a positive economic impact and can
improve the lives of all living things.
Cloning has always been thought of as something futuristic like something right out of a mad scientists mind, as in movie or book. It has been used
in countless media forms such as Star Wars, Jurassic Park and many other iconic films. The media betrayal has put cloning to fame. Most of the world
has heard of cloning and many ideas come to mind, however most of the thoughts that come to mind are misconstrued and outdated due to media
misconceptions and conclusions drawn upon by the public. That being said, cloning's overall myths or rumors get built into what people believe to
become common knowledge or facts about cloning. Cloning is much more than just making a copy of a person or some kind of object.
Dolly the sheep was the first mammal to be cloned from an adult cell. Other living things had been cloned before

Essay on Human Cloning
Would clones understand themselves as creations or copies? Would cloning undermine the conception of a human being's individuality? (Medicines'
Brave New World) Those are two of the most questioned aspects of human cloning. Everyone always wants to be their own person and have their
own thought, basically, be as original as they can be. How original can you get when there's someone out there thinking, doing, and looking exactly
like you? Not very original, if you ask me. Human cloning, cloning of any kind, has been looked at as being creepy, scary, immoral, and in the most
dismal way, exciting. Cloning of humans should be prohibited because it is offensive to the human life and religion.
In July 2000, Dr. Ian Wilmut, a geneticist of...show more content...
In the past, animal cloning experiments has dealt scientists with grotesque and disastrous outcomes. The cloned animals had either been born with
serious defects and/or deformities. The main task that needs to be taken care of before the thought human cloning even steps into the picture is that
of dealing with this major setback. It took 277 attempts to produce Dolly, and apparently Dolly is normal. It's easy to just brush off the fact that a
baby lamb was born with malformations or genetic defects. It's easy to just dump the failed experiment and not worry about the consequences. How
are we to do this if it were done to the human population? What would happen to the 277 other failed experiments produced before that one success?
More than 277 embryos, the start of 277 human beings, would die for the sake of just one embryo that would have the same DNA as some one else.
Human cloning would be means of degrading the character of the human race. It tests the boundaries of a humans way of being valuable and unique.
Cloning a human would take away a person's identity. All humans are guaranteed their own personality without barriers. The right to be yourself will be
breached by the fact that everything you thought was yours will be given to back someone else's genetic identity. It's important to know that
personality is not bounded in someone's genes, but that the

Recently there has been a bill that would allow the use of taxpayers money to fund both therapeutic and reproductive cloning research of all
humans and animals. Many people have suffered accidental medical tragedies during their lifetime. Read about a girl who needs a kidney, a burn
victim, a man who lost his leg due to cancer. All of these victims favor cloning and want science to proceed. This is why I want you, Andy Vidak to
vote yes on the bill for cloning. Cloning really does help those people who suffered from medical tragedies. Cloning can change many lives, if we do
proceed, cloning may be able to cure cancer if cloning if cloning leads to a better understanding of cell differentiation. Rumors say cloning may also
lead to a cure for heart attacks, a revolution in cosmetic surgery, organs for organ transplantation, and predictions abound about how cloning
technology will save thousands of lives. Many can benefit from this bill and will save many lives. In result people are willing to let cloning
continue for those who really need it. There are many reasons on why you should vote yes on cloning. For example, there is a couple who have
been married for over four years and decide they really want to have a baby together. After one whole year this couple simply cannot have a baby on
their own. This is where cloning comes in to help this couple in need. Human cloning provides genetically related children for those who cannot be
helped by other fertility treatments. Couples who can not produce eggs or sperm favor human cloning or even parents of a child who has died
seek redress for their loss look at human cloning for help. Cloning is able to help parents who cannot have a baby, have one.cloning is not just used
for curing diseases but can also cure someone who has has been depressed because they cannot have a child of their own or they have lost a loved
one to soon. Cloning can help people in many different ways. Another good reason why you should vote yes on the bill for cloning. Cloning can also
make a person's lifetime much longer than usual. Humans cloning essentially means taking a human beings DNA and reserving its age back to zero.
This means with the power of cloning people have the ability to

Argumentative Essay On Cloning

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Argumentative Essay On Cloning