Human Cloning Essay

Human Cloning Essay
Human Cloning For the last few decades, cloning was a fictitious idea that lay deep within the pages
of sci–fi novels and movies. The very idea that cloning could one day become reality was thought
to be a scientific impossibility by many experts. But on February 22, 1997, what was thought to
be purely science fiction became reality. That day, a team from the Roslin Institute, led by Dr. Ian
Wilmut, changed the history forever by revealing what looked like an average sheep. And its
name was Dolly. Dolly became one of the most famous if not the most famous sheep in modern
day. She was the first ever clone of a mammal. She was an exact biological carbon copy, a
laboratory counterfeit of her mother. This news shocked the world for...show more content...
Soon after in the mid 1990's, a team from the Roslin Institute, the creators of Dolly, discovered a
new and more efficient method of cloning. A method that was so simple, any in–veto lab could have
done it fifty years ago. This method of cloning was one of great similarity to the procedure
created in the 1950's. An egg cell was taken from the udder of a Finn Dorset ewe and placed in
low concentrate to allow the cell to stop dividing. Then the nucleus of a Black face ewe along
with its DNA was sucked out leaving an empty cell with all the necessary cellular machinery to
successfully produce an embryo. Using the two cells, the cell from the Finn Dorset and the cell
from the Black face, an electric pulse was created by placing them next to one another. Then
another electric pulse was created which mimicked that of the one before it. This summoned the
cells to begin divide. As the cells grew in number, an embryo slowly began to be made and soon
it was ready to be injected back into the body of another sheep (DeMuth 8). Using this same or a
similar procedure, a human clone may one day be born. When Dolly came to existence, people
realized that this breakthrough could be a door to unimaginable technology, not all necessarily
positive. The notion that this discovery could change the world and peoples lives was beginning to
threaten the minds of activists and others. Many of the fears that come with these theories are within
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay on Human Cloning
Would clones understand themselves as creations or copies? Would cloning undermine the
conception of a human being's individuality? (Medicines' Brave New World) Those are two of the
most questioned aspects of human cloning. Everyone always wants to be their own person and
have their own thought, basically, be as original as they can be. How original can you get when
there's someone out there thinking, doing, and looking exactly like you? Not very original, if you
ask me. Human cloning, cloning of any kind, has been looked at as being creepy, scary, immoral,
and in the most dismal way, exciting. Cloning of humans should be prohibited because it is offensive
to the human life and religion.
In July 2000, Dr. Ian Wilmut, a geneticist of...show more content...
In the past, animal cloning experiments has dealt scientists with grotesque and disastrous
outcomes. The cloned animals had either been born with serious defects and/or deformities. The
main task that needs to be taken care of before the thought human cloning even steps into the
picture is that of dealing with this major setback. It took 277 attempts to produce Dolly, and
apparently Dolly is normal. It's easy to just brush off the fact that a baby lamb was born with
malformations or genetic defects. It's easy to just dump the failed experiment and not worry about
the consequences. How are we to do this if it were done to the human population? What would
happen to the 277 other failed experiments produced before that one success? More than 277
embryos, the start of 277 human beings, would die for the sake of just one embryo that would have
the same DNA as some one else.
Human cloning would be means of degrading the character of the human race. It tests the boundaries
of a humans way of being valuable and unique. Cloning a human would take away a person's identity.
All humans are guaranteed their own personality without barriers. The right to be yourself will be
breached by the fact that everything you thought was yours will be given to back someone else's
genetic identity. It's important to know that personality is not bounded in someone's genes, but that
the

Essay about Human Cloning
Cloning humans has recently become a possibility. It is achieved by the production of a group of
identical cells or organisms that all derive from a single individual (Grolier 220). It is not known
when cloning humans really became a possibility, but it is known that there are two possible ways
that we can clone humans. The first way involves splitting an embryo into several halves and
creating many new individuals from that embryo. The second method of cloning a human involves
taking cells from an already existing human being and cloning them, in turn creating other
individuals that are identical to that particular person. With these two methods almost at our
fingertips, we must ask ourselves two very important questions: Can we do this,...show more
content...
There it was concluded that cloning is not something that can be done as of now, but it is quite a
possibility for the future. These scientists experimented eagerly in aims of learning how to clone
human. Shannon Brownlee of U.S. News & World Report writes, "Hall and other scientists split
single humans embryos into identical copies, a technology that opens a Pandora's box of ethical
questions and has sparked a storm of controversy around the world" (24). They attempted to create
seventeen human embryos in a laboratory dish and when it had grown enough, separated them into
forty–eight individual cells. Two of the separated cells survived for a few days in the lab developed
into new human embryos smaller than the head of a pin and consisting of thirty–two cells each
(Brownlee 24).
Although we cannot clone a human yet, this experiment occurred almost two years ago and
triggered almost an ethical emergency. Evidence from these experiments got strange reactions from
the public. Shannon Brownlee claims, "The Vatican condemned the technology of this experiment as
being perverse; one German magazine called the research `unscrupulous'" (24). This experiment
opened the possibilities of cloning to society and, even though it was unsuccessful, led people to ask
themselves what they would do if cloning were to happen. Common answers to the puzzling
questions about humans and cloning are still trying to be

Cloning Humans Essay
Cloning Humans
Ian Wilmut's foray into cloning Dolly has proved to be an appetizing entrГ©e to mankind, with the
next step being the cloning of endangered species, and eventually, humans. Although his team of
researchers had qualified to the public that it is unethical to clone humans1, the very prospect of
being able to replicate creatures of our own kind is nevertheless enticing.
Think of all the possible benefits that make many scientists prepared to cross those ethical
boundaries: Firstly, couples who have tried a long time for identical twins, triplets (or even
quintuplets!) may now be able to have them by producing clones from a single embryonic cell.
Secondly, the cloning of genetically altered cells or...show more content...
Secondly, cloning undermines the need for a reproductive system in some ways, and it will
eventually become redundant. Might we then evolve to become creatures with no reproductive
organs, such as Ape–man had evolved from his crouched body to today's human form? It is hard to
imagine what we will look like in the future. The pleasures of sex and natural birth will also be
greatly compromised! Thirdly, the previously unconceivable notion of not being able to locate the
real criminals with DNA fingerprinting toolkits might one day come true, as there could exist an
increasing number of people with identical genetic fingerprints. Even the introduction of new iris
recognition technology will also be useless since clones have similar irises! Typically, geneticists
have also tried to trace ancestral roots and hence the path of evolution via methods such as
mitochondrial DNA and Y chromosome analysis.3 A possible proliferation of clones in the future
will greatly complicate the work of these geneticists, as there might be cases of multiple possible
mothers and fathers.
A dilemma will also emerge: What type of cells should we clone–mature adult cells or embryonic
cells? Whereas embryonic cells can divide almost indefinitely in cell culture, mature cells can only
divide about 50 times4 in cell culture, which gives a pessimistic amount of nuclei to work with,

Human Cloning Essay
Human Cloning
Ever since the cloning of the first mammal, the sheep Dolly, in 1996 by Ian Wilmut of the Roslin
Institute, people have been begun to consider how they feel about human cloning. Is it possible?
Should we do it? The overwhelming answer seems to be "yes" to the first question, and "no" to the
second.
"Yes," because cloning a human is not much different from cloning a sheep. The cloning procedure
is actually so surprisingly non–technical that laboratories could easily begin conducting their own
research on human embryos today. In fact, one physicist who researched fertility sciences in the
1980's, Dr. Richard Seed, says he can already do it, and is setting up a clinic.
His clinic probably won't succeed, however,...show more content...
Many senators and bioethicists are also against it, saying things like "This is something we can and
should not tolerate. This type of research on humans is morally reprehensible" Sen. Christopher
Bond R–Mo., and "The human species doesn't need cloning" Daniel Callahan of the Hastings Center
(Bailey 1).
Because the American community is currently so largely against cloning, President Clinton has
passed a ban on federal funding of human cloning research, and asked privately funded researchers
to stop their work for the time being. In three to five years, however, Congress is going to review
the issue to see if the ban is still needed. "Whether upon such further deliberation our nation will
conclude that the use of cloning techniques to create children should be allowed or permanently
banned is, for the moment, an open question," says the National Bioethics Advisory Committee
(Executive Summary 2). Since there is going to be a re–discussion of the issue in a few years, I
think every person needs to think about where they stand on human cloning. But before we can do
this, we need to understand just what cloning is, and how it works.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
The simple definition of a clone is a plant or animal that is genetically identical to another plant or
animal. There are many examples of clones in nature. All species that reproduce asexually, such as
corals, are

Cloning Humans Essay example
Cloning Humans
Cloning is the process of duplicating a genetically identical organism through non–sexual means.
Cloning can be done with plants animals including human, but it had been success with only plants
and animals not human, since there are some argument going on about is it right or wrong to clone
human (which is actually what this essay is all about). The first cloned mammal is a sheep named
'Dolly' in 1997.The scientists had cloned other animals, such as cows and mice. There are some
discussions about cloning; some people say cloning is dangerous. In my opinion, I think cloning is
'ok' because it will make the huge leap of biological science knowledge and technology, it also
probably...show more content...
(This kind of cloning is called, Therapeutic cloning, and it is legal to do that in UK.) For example,
we can clone our Liver or Kidney for transplants.
Second reason is that we can improve the human race by cloning people those who are intelligent
or athletic in an attempt to produce a "super race" even if it's not the main aiming of the scientific
mainstream though. This kind of cloning will actually produces the genetically identical organism
from its "parent"; this kind of cloning is called 'Reproductive Cloning'. I think this is good because
we might be able to improve our immunity system in the future, so that our clones are immune to
the dangerous diseases and probably all the sickness you can find and we can also avoid defective
genes.
The idea of why I'm actually agreeing with this is because I think in the future we can have our
brain transferred to another body which is our clone – exact copy (or close edited version of our
clone) so that we can live as long as we want, and we can even have a rest (die) for long time (e.g.
100 years) and put our brain back into a clone and continue living. Or using this idea for someone
who is dead with his brain kept safe and 100% perfect and their relative wants that person back for
some reason, doctor can clone the body of the dead person using the genes from the corpse, so

Is Human Cloning Legal? Essay
Human cloning has not been legally used in humans because many people and experts are still
discussing its effectiveness, worthiness and effect on humanity. Human cloning, also known as
human genetic engineering, can be divided into two main types, which are therapeutic cloning,
growing cloned tissue from individual, and reproductive cloning, genetically identical copy of an
individual. Human cloning have drawn people's attention because people are become more
concerned about health problems and tried to find a methodology that can help them live longer and
better; human cloning seems to be one of the possible choices. However, it is still being discussed
its trade–off between benefits and risks. Despite medical benefits and advancement of...show more
content...
In addition, human cloning in the form of reproductive cloning may provide an alternative way of
having a genetically related offspring for infertile and same sex couples. Chambers (2002) & Staicu
(2012) state that reproductive cloning may be a good solution for homosexual couples to have a
child, and it can help infertile couples to overcome their health problems. As a result, a number of
health–related benefits seem to be found in both types of human cloning and these benefits could
provide a better life for people.
Human cloning not only has several medical benefits but can also contribute to the advanced
knowledge of humanity. The theory of human cloning can be learned, adapted and extended to other
fields in many ways. This biotechnology has destroyed the limit of people's knowledge about the
human body in depth, which will provide many further benefits. Learning more about disease
therapy and extend it to the pharmaceutical field is one of these benefits. Embryonic stem cell and
cloning research could be used as cellular models to understand the cause of the diseases and could
be used to test new drugs (Devolder & Savulesca, 2006). Furthermore, therapeutic cloning has a
successful tendency of curing several genetic disorders such as diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and
Parkinson's disease. For instance, in January 2005, the Japanese team

Human Cloning Essay
Human Cloning
Human Cloning comes with two dangerous processes, reproductive cloning (the creating of a new
organism) and the therapeutic cloning (the creation of a new tissues or "other biological products")
which affects the ethics of human society. Scientists perceive cloning benefits all men and women,
while religious leaders stress the idea of cloning to be an unethical process. Although human cloning
serves as an aid to the children and parents with conflicts, cloning is completely unacceptable to
convey human life as a product.
Humans reproductively and therapeutically give the idea of people becoming a product rather than a
living being. Siedler emphasizes that...show more content...
People are born to live individually, free to express their uniqueness, but cloning shatters the
varieties of all human kind and cause the people to serve with purpose; purpose to be the same
(Siedler 91–92). The differences of every person with their talents or outer appearance "will be
changed, giving them absolutely no individuality or specialness," (Goodnough 45–47).
Scientists guarantee the "good" causes cloning may give to the world, but cloning advocates the
unacceptable idea to the people of this generation. God produced his own place in His own eyes
and the way He wanted His children to become, but cloning destroys everything; destroys the
creation of His own beloved and creates "the danger of playing God," (Goodnough 47). Cloning
illustrates a sign of human going against God and changes the life God provided, which Goodnough
stresses that "humans were given the privilege of finding themselves through what God have given
them, but all will [be erased] with cloning that could go against the gift of God" (47). With such a
simple human cloning process, it can "raise deep concerns [about people's]...most cherished concepts
of faith," (Goodnough 109). A human carry a great amount of power within but is it to the point that
humans could call themselves their own creator? Lisa Yount declares "there is a strong and real
understanding that [humans] are not [their]

Human Cloning
Ethical Concerns on Human Cloning Human cloning, one of the most fascinating chapters in
scientific history. Cloning goes back to the first mammal that was successfully cloned, Dolly the
sheep. Dolly was duplicated on July 5, 1996 and since then the world has had many scientific
advancements. Abby Norman, author of "How Close Are We to SuccessfullyCloning our First
Human" said that other types of mammals such as goats, rats, pigs, mice, and rabbits have been
cloned successfully but cloning other mammals and primates may not be so easy. Scientists are
not yet able to successfully clone a human, but believe they will be able to do so by the 2020s.
(Norman) Along with such a controversial topic there comes many who would agree that copying a
human would be beneficial while on the opposing side some would argue that replicating someone's
genes is ethically wrong. Cloning is a very important topic and according to the President's Council
on Bioethics, "The prospect of cloning–to–produce–children, which would be a radically new form
of procreation, raises deep concerns about identity and individuality, the meaning of having children,
the difference between procreation and manufacture, and the relationship between the generations"
("Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry", 2017). Although useful for studying
genetic diseases, human cloning produces issues as to whether it should be allowed or not because
some believe the copy will have the same personality and

Human Cloning Essay
Human Cloning There are many opinions on the topic of cloning, particularly on the controversy of
human cloning. Lots of people have many fears over if we should continue this form of study,
whereas others think that this technology should be pushed forward with high hopes. However, no
side should rule out the other, but instead, should compliment one another. Both arguments should
be heard and acknowledged before any decision is made towards this new area of study. For
example, many people think that their fears are unanswerable and should cause the absolute ban on
cloning.
Although many scientists are in the field of cloning, many other people have scientific reasons why
this shouldn't happen. One reason is that if a human clone...show more content...
Another concern with Dolly was that the clone was not entirely from one origin. It is now known
that Dolly doesn't carry the entire DNA structure of her 'mother'. The clone could have received
fetal cells, resulting in mixed DNA from a female and male, which means that Dolly was just the
product of an artificial insemination. At this point, many scientists agree that it could have been a
mistake, but other clones have been produced that are true clones, such as: October 3, 1997,
Honolulu, created a mouse clone from cumulus cells surrounding an embryo named Cumulina,
resulting in 50 clones with a success rate of 50:1 by July 1998; cloned monkeys at Oregon, March
1997, with possible success chances with humans; and others that you can find in the news
nowadays. Along with these scientific arguments, many people also have moral issues.
Moral issues play a big part in the ongoing battle over cloning. Under some main religions,
arguments rise that the creation of life is against the will of 'God', and that humans shouldn't have
this power because it's unnatural, and it shouldn't be abused. However, some cloning scientists
counter that in some religious texts, human is portrayed as a sort of co–creator with the 'Supreme'. A
certain group, led by Rael (formerly known as Claude Vorilhorn and president of "Clonaid"), claim
that he was visited by aliens in 1973 who said they created life by cloning their own DNA and
genetically changing

Human Cloning Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Custom Paper Writing Service

More from Custom Paper Writing Service (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Human Cloning Essay