Food Inc. Analysis

Food Inc. Analysis
I was sitting in my AP Environmental Science class during my sophomore year. The lights were dimmed, the projector beeped on, and the documentary
began. Then the title flashed across the screen reading "Food, Inc." Though beforehand I thought little of what the film would be about, it would have
me thinking to this day.
I learned of the deception that occurred inside the corporate food world. When I learned all that was being covered up, I was outraged. If these are
products that we voluntarily consume, we should have every right to know what is in those products. The mistreatment of animals of that occurs is
baffling to me. To have such little respect for something that keeps us alive is completely inappropriate. I couldn't help but tear up over the images of
animals being mistreated; unable to walk because their internal organs could not keep up with their unnatural growth; being kicked around and...show
more content...
In March of 2016, I became a vegetarian in order to help solve the problems the food conglomerates caused. This was a decision met with various
reactions. My family was supportive of my decision, always making sure there was something I could eat at family gatherings. Others seemed
dumbfounded by the very thought of someone converting to vegetarianism. The conversation between myself and a person who finds out about my
decision runs like clockwork. "Why?" They always ask – and I mean always. I explain that it is for ethical reasons, for the animals. Once I mention the
animal mistreatment the conversation usually ends. The phase "ignorance is bliss" best describes how people want to tackle the subject of animal
mistreatment. People will usually end by saying, "I could never do that." I find it funny though, because I once felt the same way. I was someone who
ate chicken with almost every meal but managed to live without it. My feelings about the food system was strong enough to change my entire
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay about Food Inc
FOOD INC.: An unflattering look inside America's corporate controlled food industry.
Movie Review by Markovist Wells
Professor Patrick Elliott
POLS 1101–511
Essay Question: In what ways does this movie demonstrate the "Iron Triangle" and its powerful influence in the manner that our government functions?
In the documentary Food Inc. The message is that the food industry does not want us to know about what we are eating. . This problem may be true
however it is driven by the consumer's continual interest in buying cheaper and cheaper products. The farmers way of life has been revolutionized.
Modern farmers think faster, cheaper, bigger. It's really not until when consumers demand...show more content...
This results in certain agricultural products being subsidized by taxpayers.
These powerful alliances requires the consumer to navigate through the confusing food environment and to pay close attention to nutritional facts,
labels, and to carefully and consciously be mindful of advertisement of all sorts of media. For farmers, its a crippling business system that destroys
their profession. For consumers, who do not make a conscious effort where they shop and what they eat subjects themselves to a lifestyle that can
progressively lead to obesity and many other life threatening diseases. The politics of obesity and disease within the food industry is a public health
concern. I do not in any way underestimate the power and influence within the federal government and the three sides of various congressional
committees. We've never had food industries so powerful in our history These various congressional committees which fund government programs and
operations and then provide oversight of them, and the federal agencies, often Independent agencies, which are responsible for the regulation of those
affected industries and lastly, the industries themselves, as well as their trade associations and lobbying groups, which benefit, or seek benefit, from
these operations and programs all play a vital role

Rhetorical Analysis Of Food Inc
Food Inc. : A Rhetorical Analysis Food Inc., a documentary film produced by Robert Kenner and based on Eric Schlosser's book Fast Food
Nation, is designed to inform the American people of the food industry's sinister side. The film paints the food industry in a more realistic light
than the advertised and perceived image of an "Agrarian America." Food Inc. not only uses compelling images, such as hundreds of baby chickens
being raised in spaces no larger than a desk drawer, but also includes the voices and stories of farmers, businessmen and women, government
officials, and victims of the food industry. As the film is being played, the audience sees the horrors and immorality of the food industry, feels disgust
towards the unethical greed for wealth over safety of customers, shares in the helplessness of oppressed farmers, workers, and animals, finally feeling
a sense of hope at the end where the film tells the audience they can vote for safer, better foods with what they decide to buy. Food Inc. effectively
intertwines visual elements along with commentary, forging an ominous and foreboding image of the food industry that is furthered by its audio track
and expert testimonies, creating a potent warning to the American consumer of the darker side within the food industry. In the opening moments of the
film, images of corn and wheat fields spanning acres of land, along with a cattle rancher riding his horse among a magnificent grassy landscape
surrounded by trees, are

Essay About Food Inc
Food Inc. Reaction
The role that our U.S government plays in the food industry is an extremely impactful and important one. However, our government's hand in the food
industry may not be benefiting us in the way that we believe. The origin of our food products, the overall well–being of our food products, the financial
status of our food products, and the regulations of our food products are all operated by our government, and as consumers of we are encouraged to
place our trust in the system that is responsible for providing us with honest products, and in doing so we are often unknowingly let down. вЂЁIt
seems to be that the majority of consumers have not the slightest clue where their food is originated, while even individuals who think...show more
content...
We place our confidence in our government to provide is with conscientious facts and actions. The film, Food Inc., highlights the idea that if
individuals were aware of the exact provenance of their menu they would more than likely stray away from such misconstrued products. The process
by which our foods are constructed can be unsettling to most people and I believe that's a large reason as to why our government guides our attention
in another direction. вЂЁOur prominent trust in our government goes further than just the origin of our food; it continues with the misconception that a
large number of people have with the idea that our government is feeding us healthy products. Families across the nation believe that the hierarchies
are going above and beyond to provide us with adequate and equitable food, however often times I assume that they're hardly doing the bare minimum.
People assume that if our government is distributing a product than it is safe and properly maintained. While not all food companies may be practicing
the same methods as others, our government has a role in the operation regardless.вЂЁAs consumers we are also led to purchase products that are
manufactured by these large companies because they are provided to us at an

Food Inc : Rhetorical Analysis Of Food, Inc.
Food, Inc. : Rhetorical Analysis
In the prestigious documentary film, Food Inc., produced by Robert Kenner and founded upon an Eric Schlosser's book, Fast Food Nation, Mr. Kenner
has an intriguing impact on the American consumers of many food products and industries. Throughout the film, viewers and everyday consumers of
these various products, visualize what takes place behind the scenes in food factories, contrary to what they may see through forms of advertisement.
The documentary generates an image of an "Agrarian America" in a naturalistic way to convey the message of what food production truly consists of.
The film uses ethos, pathos, and logos as rhetorical devices to enhance the horrendousness of food production to its audience in multiple ways. Food
Inc. provides not only a visual effect on the audience's emotion to portray its message, but uses a variety of commentary scenes from several experts
and members within the food industry.
The film begins with an introduction scenery of acres and large amounts of crops (corn and wheat), along with cattle and other forms of animals used
in the production of the meat industry. During the agricultural featured scene, Mr. Schlosser elucidated how food preferences and the way we eat is
evolving at a rapid speed, while others still perceive the food industry as an agrarian corporation. The film then makes its emotional appeal towards
the audience by providing images and videos of chickens in multiple repulsive situations. The chickens were thrown onto conveyor belts by primarily
African American workers, which now accounts for a fine percentage of employees in the food industry. Schlosser elaborates on the unseen dilemma
of animal and worker abuse in these corporations. He then exemplifies his realization of how the abuse is enacted in numerous ways, one of which is
implementing restrictions as to what workers are allowed to do and say. They use these restrictions as a way of controlling their workers and providers
in such industries, because the workers/providers can't risk losing the income they receive from these multi–billionaire companies. The above said
scenes justifies how Schlosser uses emotional appeals to the viewers in order to enhance the initial

Persuasive Essay On Food Inc
Food: You buy and eat it everyday. However do you ever stop and think about what's in the food you're eating? The average american spends
anywhere from 6,604 dollars in a year all the way up to 8,886 dollars on food. That's a lot of money. If consumers are paying that much money, they
should know whats in it. It is an ongoing issue that most people are not informed about what they are eating. Everyone should have the right to know
what is in their food.
Robert Keener was the director of the 2008 film Food, Inc.This film was made to more or less expose the dark side of the food industry and it went
into extensive detail in how Major corporations have taken over all aspects of the food chain in the United States, from the farms where our food
is grown to the chain restaurants and supermarkets where it's sold. In the film, one of the topics they went over was how the food industry does not
want us as the people to know what's in the food we eat. Multiple companies even denied their farmers to let the world see what it is like in their
farms and how they treat the animals. There is an unknown problem in the world and it is that most people do not know what is in the food they are
eating. Some companies try to hide it and say that you do not need to know what is in it. Fast food and meat packaging companies force farmers into a
uncivilized approach in how they feed and raise their animals. Many farmers are forced to give antibiotics to their animals. Andrew Gunther gives

Food Inc Essay
The Unveiling of the Food Industry Food is an essential part of our lives. We consume it every day and absolutely need it to live and thrive
successfully. With something so significant to us, why should we risk the source of where our food comes from? Robert Kenner created a powerhouse
documentary film called Food Inc. that gives an accurate description of the horrible realities of corporate farming by providing evidence of the harm
affecting both humans and animals. Robert Kenner is a film director and producer. Kenner claims that today; food can be potentially harmful to the
health of any consumer and the process of creating certain foods is detrimental to the lives of the animals and humans involved in the procedure. Kenner
...show more content...
Pathos is persuasion by, in this case, clips in a video, to appeal to the emotions of the viewer. Robert Kenner displays multiple scenes representing
pathos; some that are graphic, sad, or cruel. In the start of the first chapter, "Fast Food to All Food", pathos already played a role when it came to the
living conditions of the chickens in the first chapter. Since the demand for food is so high, chicken companies such as Tyson are mass–producing their
chickens at such a fast rate and are being grown as food rather than animals. According to Fast Food Nation's author, Eric Schlosser, the chickens
are now being "raised and slaughtered in half the time they were fifty years ago but now they're twice as big". Kenner showcases this fact by
providing a memorable visual of the size comparison of the chickens. Carole Morison, a Perdue grower describes the anatomy of chickens being
grown in seven weeks by stating that "their bones and internal organs can't keep up with the rapid growth". According to Carole, the chickens could
barely stand, as they would "take a few steps and just plop down because they can't keep up with all the weight they're carrying." It was sad witnessing
the struggle of the chickens with such a simple task as just walking.
However, the size of the chickens weren't the only issue, the living conditions also created problems. For example, the Tyson farms were raising their
chickens in horrible farmhouses. Vince Edwards, a

Food, Inc. Discussion Questions
Food, Inc.–Thinking about the Movie
(Discussion Questions)
I.Write a short paragraph or so about what you know about where your food comes from. I want you to think about where it comes from before it gets
to the supermarket or the restaurant. If you feel you're not really sure where it comes from, write about that. Why aren't you sure?
Wow! That's a huge question, since there are many types offood. I believe fresh fruits and vegetables are harvested in bulk from farms, orchards,
vineyards, etc., and then go through facilities that handle the cleaning, sorting, packaging (for fresh), and canning. Milk originates at dairy farms and
either gets bottled there, or shipped in bulk to facilities that process it into many...show more content...
Write about your impressions of these two segments, especially when considered alongside one another.
The chickens in the major operation tumble through chutes and conveyor belts while they are still alive, like they are some non–biological material.
Salatin's chickens are processed by hand and are slaughtered by bleeding them out, which I've heard before is the least traumatic way to die from an
external physical force.
15.Gary Hisrhberg of Stoneyfield farms describes Walmart as one of the most vilified corporations in America. He goes on to say that "a sale of a
million dollars to Walmart [of organic products] helps to save the world." First, what does vilified mean and why do you think Walmart is vilified?
Second, why is a huge sale of organic products to Walmart one way to help save the world?
Vilify means to portray as "the bad guy" or villain. Many people think Walmart is harmful to communities by taking sales away from local small
business. But a healthy, organically produced product on Walmart's shelves can reach a lot more consumers due to their large customer base.
16.What do you understand from the movie about why Monsanto is able to sue farmers for something as basic as saving their own seeds? What is
your response to this kind of corporate prosecution of farmers?
Because Monsanto patented the their gene modification, they legally own all rights to any seed

Persuasive Essay On Food Inc
Would you like to have no decisions on the healthiness of your food, and being able to only eat fast food, fried foods, etc. Most people would say
no and rightfully so, people should be able to have choices on the foods they want to eat whether it's healthy, unhealthy, fast food, farm grown, we
shouldn't have only unhealthy foods for our choices of what we eat. In the film Food Inc. directed by Robert Kenner there is a part in the movie
that talks about the food choices of consumers. A point that was talked about for a decent amount of time in this part was how healthier foods are
more expensive than fast food. This stood out to me because it's true it cost more to eat healthy than it does to just go through a drive through.
This is outrageous it should be the opposite, we should have to spend more for fast food than healthy foods. While at most fast food places there
are ways you can eat healthy food but it is still more expensive than just buying a cheeseburger or chicken nuggets. During this part of the film a
family was talking and saying that they have to choose whether to eat healthier food or get there father/husbands medicine so he could work. A
family has to choose between those to things and that is not fair to anyone that has to make that decision. The family wanted to have better food and
to not always be eating fast food meals but they don't really have a choice and that is heartbreaking to see. The cost of healthy food compared to fast
food or

Food Inc : Rhetorical Analysis Of Food, Inc.
Food, Inc. : Rhetorical Analysis
In the prestigious documentary film, Food Inc., produced by Robert Kenner and founded upon an Eric Schlosser's book, Fast Food Nation, Mr. Kenner
has an intriguing impact on the American consumers of many food products and industries. Throughout the film, viewers and everyday consumers of
these various products, visualize what takes place behind the scenes in food factories, contrary to what they may see through forms of advertisement.
The documentary generates an image of an "Agrarian America" in a naturalistic way to convey the message of what food production truly consists of.
The film uses ethos, pathos, and logos as rhetorical devices to enhance the horrendousness of food production to its audience in multiple ways. Food
Inc. provides not only a visual effect on the audience's emotion to portray its message, but uses a variety of commentary scenes from several experts
and members within the food industry.
The film begins with an introduction scenery of acres and large amounts of crops (corn and wheat), along with cattle and other forms of animals used
in the production of the meat industry. During the agricultural featured scene, Mr. Schlosser elucidated how food preferences and the way we eat is
evolving at a rapid speed, while others still perceive the food industry as an agrarian corporation. The film then makes its emotional appeal towards the
audience by providing images and videos of chickens in multiple repulsive situations.

Food Inc Essay
The documentary Food Inc. is a great example of commercial farming. The purpose of commercial farming is to mass produce food and animals, to
feed the community. The concept of commercial farming could also go along food security. The community needs to make sure that there is enough
food to feed the growing population at all times. The problem right now isn't that there isn't enough food, but rather that there is too much food. The
Tyson company produces all kinds of meat to feed people around the country, and when doing so they tend to overproduce. With this overproduction,
we are left with expired animals that cannot be produced into food for consumption, and in turn, provide extra parts that aren't useful or helpful. Some
other concepts the documentary went over briefly were crops and GMOs. Cereal grains are the most common grains eaten and used all over the world.
Cereal grains include wheat, rice, maize, and some others. These cereal grains take up a massive amount of space to grow and harvest and drain the
nutrients from the ground. New technologies have developed to increase the speed of growth, and the amount of plant that is produced. Some of these
new technologies include pesticides and chemicals that cause the plants to artificially grow to have the outcome most helpful for human consumption.
GMOs are another topic...show more content...
There are other contributions to wages being low for commercial farmers as well. An example could be the fact that big companies, like Tyson,
require all of the feedlots to fit specific criteria. This means that farmers have to have their farms upgraded constantly, and are in an eternal debt that
continues to grow. Since the debts are so big, it's almost impossible for farmers to get out of their contracts and not be

Food Inc.
Food Inc. The documentary Food inc. by Robert Kenner is a documentary about the food industry and some of the issues that have emerged with the
modernization of said food industry. Robert Kenner presents his arguments in sorts of subtitle such as "The dollar menu", and "The cornucopia" to
help identify his main points. Robert Kenner also brings in some experts such as Michael Pollen and Barbara Kowalcyk, into his documentary to bring
some credibility to his argument, as well as adding specific music at particular times to tug at the emotions of the viewers. In this documentary Robert
Kenner not only shows what happens to those who eat the products produced by the corporate food industry but also those who help in the production.
Kowalcyk feels everyday over the loss of her son. Robert Kenner continues to speak about the issues associated to E–coli and how it relates to the meat
packing industry. Michael Pollen tells us "If you take a food lot cow and take it off its corn diet and feed it grass for five days the cow will shed eighty
percent of the E–coli in its system". He then goes on to say that this doesn't happen but rather the companies come up with radical ways to solve the
E–coli problem. One such example is the Beef Products Incorporated located in South Sioux City, Nebraska what this company does is it takes all
of the meat taken from the cows and put them in these containers and cleans the meat with ammonia. This company's meat is in seventy percent of
the countries fast food. Also the company believes that within the next five years they will supply one hundred percent of the countries fast food
hamburger meat. We are then given information about the meat packing industry its self, and how after 1906 after Upton Sinclair wrote "The
Jungle" the meat industry was getting better, and by the 1950's being in the meat packing industry was considered a good job. However now the
way workers are being dehumanized and having to repeat one job over and over similar to a machine a job in the meat packing industry is becoming
more and more dangerous. Lastly Kenner addresses a recent strain put on corn farmers by

Essay about Analysis of Food Inc.
Food Inc. and the Media use the tools of social psychology to persuade and make its point. Documentary films are influential media tools that can be
used to inform, persuade, and convict the public on many social topics on a continuous spectrum of troubles and struggle of the world. Some
well–made documentaries have made impacts on people who watch them, and this is what the movies are they meant to do. The filmmakers have
done their job if the movie has given a voice to a problem and a face to the issue that needs to be known. Eric Schlosser one of the film's co–producer
said it best in Food Inc., "The industry doesn't want you to know the truth about what you're eating, because if you knew, you might not want to eat
I learn so much about a subject that I may have heard about from the television or radio news, a newspaper, in a conversation or even in the
classroom. I have spent hours on a subject matter that I may have never heard about. This is a part of my self–concept of finding me. The factor that
influences my self–concept is, the social identity I am forming (Myers, 2010). I am searching for a more educated identity that cares about where
my food comes from, who grew it, and what was used to help it grow. Food Inc. was made I trust to inform the public about a social dilemma in our
country, which the government and "a small group of multinational corporations who control our entire food system from seed to the supermarket;
they're gaining the control of food" (Roush, 2008). Farmers who are contracted with these corporations are raising chickens in coops with no
windows, no room to move they are being raised in half the time due to growth hormones. Scientists have changed the chicken's bodies to have
bigger breasts. These animals barely exist to produce food for disengaged and uninformed people. This film was a hard film to watch, because I can
no longer claim to live in my ignorant bliss. The person that I am, the self I have been looking for has to make a change, for me, and my family. I
need to respond to

Food, Inc.
I was immediately intrigued from the beginning of Food, Inc. There was interesting and valuable information brought up during the film. Many
people do not think about where their food comes from. I believe that if people were to know where their food comes from, they would not want to
eat it. There are 47,000 products at a grocery store. But, Food, Inc. implies that this is in fact an illusion because all of them are made with the same
crops. The fact that there are only a few multi–national corporations that control all of the crops and meat production is a huge surprise. I believe that
each person in society would be absolutely shocked if they were to watch this documentary. McDonald's is the largest purchaser of meat, potatoes,
pork, apples,...show more content...
I am so ashamed that I had not known most of the information that was shared in Food, Inc. I definitely agree that we need to have a policy
change regarding our food, it should be cheaper to buy carrots than chips at the grocery store. I, like many college students, want to eat healthy but
it is expensive and most of us are on a "ramen budget". There also needs to be tighter laws regarding the illnesses that can come from improper
handling of the meat and crops. I believe that there needs to be a huge change in the agricultural world, the farmers should not have to be scared of
losing money or being sued because of big companies, such as Monsanto. The huge companies are going to be making money no matter what without
much work. Whereas a farmer puts in work day in and day out and sadly they do not make much money. I also believe that the film had an extremely
negative outlook on how modern farming practices in agriculture are. I believe that Food, Inc. focused on the negative outlook of modern farming but
did not mention about the different practices or how they have also positively impacted our

Essay on Food Inc
Rhetorical Analysis – Food Inc.
'Food Inc', is an informative, albeit slightly biased, documentary that attempts to expose the commercialisation and monopolisation of the greater food
industry. The film attempts to show the unintended consequences resulting from this, and for the most part this technique is very effective; however
there is an overreliance on pathos in lieu of facts and statistics at times.
'Food Inc' starts off with a camera moving slowly through supermarket shelves with menacing background music and a bass voiceover informing the
audience that, 'in the American supermarket, there are no such things as seasons.' Tomatoes and fruits, we are told, are grown overseas while in season
but still green, then gassed to...show more content...
Farmers are paid to overproduce corn, which is sold for less than the cost of production. Much of the excess is used as a cheap sugar substitute in
various products, and much of it used to feed cattle; to produce bigger, meatier cows. It is at this point we learn of the unintended consequences of
constantly putting quantity before quality, in the chapter aptly titled 'unintended consequences.' Cows fed a corn diet produce deadly strains of e–coli,
leading to numerous safety recalls of beef in recent years. Pollan at one point tells us that simply feeding cows grass for a period of five days would
virtually eliminate any strains of the contaminate, but that this is seen as a fiscally excessive exercise by the corporations. He is presented as
somewhat of an authority on the matter, but all we are really told is that he is an author with interest in mass produced foods, an attempt at ethos that
falls somewhat flat. Instead of doing this however, a new industry has emerged: one that combines ammonia with hamburger filler for the companies,
killing any strains of e–coli before they can reach the consumer. The film attempts to portray a deadly cycle, where untested solutions often produce
deadly side–effects; which are in turn fixed with even more untested solutions, a technique that seems quite effective.
The film utilises emotional appeals, or pathos, to convince its audience more so than probably any other technique. Perhaps the

Documentary: Food Inc Essay
Everyone has the right to know what's in the food that they are eating. It's upsetting how these massive corporations dominate American citizens. If
everyone knew how much brutality was required to meet the demands of the fast food industry, I like to think the public would simply not tolerate it
and demand that animals stop being designated property in law. I find it impossible to believe that if people knew the reality that they would not want
animals to have recourse to legal protections from enduring lifetimes of nothing but abuse. Food Assignment 1. Earthlings The film features a quote
from Jeremy Bentham, the philosophical godfather of animal rights, so to speak, which says, 'The question is not, "Can they reason?" nor, "Can they
The reality is that meat consumption is at epidemic levels, and the corporations who control the food chain know it. 3. Loving Animals to Death
In the cover story, "Loving Animals to Death" by James McWilliams, it discusses how important it is to know where you get your meats from. For
example, Bob Comis of Stony Brook Farm is a different type of a professional pig farmer, in fact, the good kind. He believes it's important that the
animals he has should be raised with dignity and not unfairly and crudely. Although Comis' believes what he does for a living is wrong, he does it
because it's what we all enjoy eating regardless of how much we truly know about it. What's most important when it comes to food is where it's
coming from and how it will be prepared. If a person loves pork, that's fine, as long as the pork comes from a local humane farm. The food movement
is basically more constructural rather than nutritional. Eating anything you want is fine as long as it comes from a place that is nonindustrial. 4. How
The Food Industry Manipulates Taste Buds With 'Salt Sugar Fat' In the article, "How The Food Industry Manipulates Taste Buds With 'Salt Sugar Fat'"
it talks about the frightening truth that has been going on in the past few years with obesity and diabetes. Americans tend to have a huge addiction
when it comes to food made with sugar, fat, salt, and as well as

Food Inc. Summary Essay
Food Inc. opens in an American supermarket and draws attention to the unnatural nature of year–round tomatoes and boneless meat. It pulls aside the
curtain that is concealing the truth about food from the consumer. After the brief intro, the movie shifts its focus to the topic of fast food and its impact
on the meat industries. Fast food virtually started with McDonald's. When they decided to simplify their menu and hire employees that repeated one
task over and over for minimum wage, the result was the fast food phenomenon that swept the United States, and then the world. Today, McDonald's is
the largest purchaser of beef and potatoes in the United States, and is one of the largest purchasers of pork, chicken, tomatoes, and apples. Though
Corn is the number one grain used to feed animals for slaughter. Feeding cows corn instead of their natural diet lead to the unintentional creation of
157H7 E. coli, a deadly bacteria that can kill. The film reveals how food standards have dropped, with only 9,164 safety inspections from the FDA
each year as compared to over 50,000 in 1972. The food industry has become consolidated to the point of a few companies having a great deal of
power and influence via the government. The USDA is no longer able to shutdown plants with contaminated meat. A bill titled "Kevin's Law" had the
intent of changing that, but, after 6 years, the bill still has not been passed. Food companies have made some attempts to reduce E. coli by cleaning
their meats in an ammonia solution. However, unhealthy food is being subsidized and contributing to American obesity and the rise of type 2 diabetes
in adolescents. The film then travels to a hog processing plant that kills 32,000 hogs a day. They expose the strategy of the company to hire extremely
poor and illegal immigrants who can't afford to quit their jobs, despite problems with frequent infections of the hands and fingernails, a side effect of
poor sanitation standards. We then discover that it has been legal to patent life since the 1980s, and learn about the company Monsanto's round up
resistant soybean that now makes up 90% of the soybean market. Monsanto

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Food, Inc.
The basic survival needs of human beings include a small list of four things: food, water, clothing, and shelter. After watching an interview with Robert
Kenner, the director of Food, Inc., I began to realize that the food humans are eating is actually decreasing are survivability. Within the excerpts from
the movie and the dialogue amongst the interviewers, it was made apparent that the food industry has been able to completely deceive the consumers.
Instead of choosing food for quality, individuals choose food by lowest price. As Kenner said in the video, "we have skewed our food system to the
bad calories" (2:38). Instead of healthy home cooked meals, families are purchasing fast food for its convenience and low cost. However, the video
made a very interesting stance in regards to this mentality. Although individuals are paying the lowest price for food in history, the cost of treating
diseases caused by unhealthy eating has grown to be higher than ever before (8:04). The consumers have definitely done their part in terms of the
obesity epidemic; however, they are not the only ones to blame. This video sheds light on how misinformed consumers are with the food choices they
are making. "There is...show more content...
Kenner reported that companies found it more beneficial to keep diseased food on the shelves and pay out the law suits (25:15). It is crazy to me that
companies would not want to spend the money to conserve the reputation and respect of their company, but would rather pay off the individuals who
actually report a recall. The scariest thing is that, as consumers, we are not given any information and are not able to avoid chemically treated or
processed foods (18:10). The antibiotic–treated chicken is sold without warning and E. coli exists within meats. As humans, we eat food for
nourishment. What happens when the food we are eating acts as a poison to our

Essay On Food Inc
The human body is a complex machine and it requires fuel to run. This "fuel" is known as food and for the body to be efficient, it needs to ingest the
good fuel. At a glance, I thought that Food, Inc., would not make such an impact on me since it is an American documentary film. But, since our world
is getting smaller, our resources are being transported and exchanged around the globe. So the food consumed in another continent can be found on the
dinner tables of a different country.
In general, the film focuses on the economically, environmentally unsustainable, and dangerous industrial production of food. It exposes the hushed
industry that is controlled by powerful food companies. Now, I saw some gruesome scenes. It was horrible. It made me feel as if I was one of those
workers that brutally handled the animals because I eat those meats. My act as a consumer supports and sustains those real and inhumane methods.
Then I...show more content...
First, there was a lack of experts. They did show knowledgeable people but none of which talked about the complicated science of food and legal
concerns. You see when a mother without legal education and a farmer discusses food economics, their words seem less than believable. Perhaps
some people were afraid of the limelight and would rather stay silent or maybe food economists or lawyers were at the back of the mind of the
directors. Second, is the shortage of solutions. The film is indeed informative, but as it progressed, its just one complaint after the other without
concrete proposals. At the end of the film it left the viewers with the common notion of just buy the organic and local products. And I am aware that the
purpose of the documentary is to share the information but its 2017 already and nothing has changed. Without collective action and alternatives, there
will be miniscule progress. It is quite brave to directly unravel the truth but when you fight with the giants, you need a stronger

Food Inc. Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Food Inc. Analysis