1. Breakfast Seminar Series
Environmental, Health & Safety
Regulatory Updates
Introductions
September 26, 2017 Middletown CT
Wayne E. Bates, PhD, PE, Principal Engineer
2. Firm Overview
■ Multi-disciplinary Consulting Firm Founded in 1911
■ Full Service Capabilities: 330 Person Staff
■ Employee Owned
■ 8 Offices in MA, CT, NH and NY
4. Tighe & Bond Full Service Capabilities
Civil Engineering
•Dams & Levees
•Geotechnical
Engineering
•Infrastructure
•Land Use Planning
•Low Impact Design
•Parking & Circulation
•Site Planning &
Design
•Transportation
Environmental
Consulting
•Brownfields
•Demolition &
Asbestos/ Hazardous
Materials
•Environmental
Permitting & Planning
•Fuel Storage
•Health & Safety
•Regulatory
Compliance
•Site Assessment &
Remediation
•Wetlands and
Ecological Services
Building Services
•Geotechnical
Engineering
•Electrical &
Mechanical
Engineering
•LEED Green Design
•Owner’s Project
Manager
•Structural Engineering
Technology
•3D Modeling
•GIS
Sustainability
•Energy & Resource
Conservation
•LEED Green Design
•Low Impact Design
•Renewable Energy
Environmental
Engineering
•Drinking Water
•Solid Waste
•Stormwater
•Wastewater
5. About our Speakers?
■ Regulatory Experts
■ Actively engaged in professional societies
■ Track regulations
■ Good reputation among regulators
■ History of helping clients with regulatory
challenges
■ Ability to assist in determining applicability
6. Let’s Get Started
■ 8:00-8:30am Introductions Wayne Bates
■ 8:30-9:00am Soil Management – What to do with all that soil Amy Vaillancourt
■ 9:00-9:30am HBMA – Planning Saves Time and Money Kevin McCarthy
■ 9:30-10:00am Environmental Compliance Updates Tim Kucab
■ 10:00-10:30am Break
■ 10:30-11:00am Safety and Health Updates Dave Horowitz
■ 11:00-11:30am Property Transactions – Reducing Risk Jim Olsen
■ 11:30-Noon Panel Discussion/Q&A All
7. Breakfast Seminar Series
Soil Management
September 26, 2017 Middletown, CT
Amy Vaillancourt, Project Manager, LEP
What to do with all that soil?
8. Agenda
■ What is considered
“clean”
■ Requirements for
sampling
■ Current regulations
– Management, Storage,
Disposal
■ Beneficial reuse and off-
site disposal
■ Questions
9. Generation of Excess Soils
■ Projects
- Infrastructure improvements
- Developments and facility expansions or upgrades
- Underground storage tank installation or removal
■ Pre-planning
- Important to know history of area – is contamination likely?
- Is sampling required or just prudent?
o In-situ characterization
o Waste characterization
• Disposal or reuse
• Offsite vs onsite
10. What is “Clean”
■ Definitions:
– Clean = natural soil with no detected pollutants
– Polluted = pollutants detected at concentrations below CTDEEP
Remediation Standard Regulations (RSRs)
– Contaminated = pollutants detected above RSRs
– Hazardous = ignitable, flammable, corrosive toxic (RCRA Regs);
potential hazard to human health or environment (CT State Regs)
– Is there a requirement to test ?
» If contamination observed = YES
» reuse on site = NO
» off-site disposal or off-site reuse = In most cases
Clean Fill
– RSRs vs CTDOT
11. Current Regulations
■ Stockpiling of Contaminated Soils
– Requires permittee to sample
■ Remediation Standard Regulations
– Any property in a formal CTDEEP Program
– But…… CTDEEP recommends everyone
■ Solid Waste
– For anyone generating, storing, treating, or disposing of solid waste
(includes soils, asphalt, brick, concrete)
■ Hazardous Waste
– For anyone generating, storing, treating, or disposing of hazardous
waste (defined by RCRA)
12. General Permit for Stockpiling
Contaminated Soils
■ “Contaminated soil and/or sediment” means treated or untreated soil
and/or sediment affected by a known or suspected release and
determined, or reasonably expected to contain substances
exceeding Residential Direct Exposure Criteria or GA Pollutant
Mobility Criteria, as these terms are defined in section 22a-133k-1 of
the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies.
- Stage and/or temporarily store ≥1,000 cy and ≤ 10,000 cy at
any one time of contaminated soil and/or sediment at the site
of excavation for a period exceeding 45 days in duration.
- Transfer, stage, and/or temporarily store >10 cy and ≤ 10,000
cy at any one time of contaminated soil and/or sediment at a
site other than the site of excavation from which the soil
and/or sediment originated.
13. General Permit for Stockpiling
Contaminated Soils
■ If >10 cy but <1,000 cy on-site – no registration
needed, but need to comply with General Permit
protocols (including CTDEEP E&S controls)
■ All other qualifying activities require registration
■ Approval of registration needed if:
– Storing greater than 10,000 cy at excavation site or off-site
– Must provide Operations and Maintenance Plan
■ If in an Aquifer Protection Area the local municipal
Aquifer Protection Agency must be notified in writing
■ Permit expires after two years
14. General Permit for Stockpiling
Contaminated Soils
■ The maximum amount of incidental excavation waste
(asphalt, brick, concrete, etc) stored at the Staging,
Transfer, and/or Temporary Storage Area shall be as
follows:
- (i) <10,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil and/or
sediment
No more than 100 cubic yards of incidental
excavation waste shall be stored at any one time.
- (ii) >10,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil
and/or sediment
No more than 1,000 cubic yards of incidental
excavation waste shall be stored at any one time.
15. Issues Encountered
■ Pesticides
– Can’t tell they are there
■ Asphalt
– Source of petroleum compounds
■ Concrete / Brick
– Can contain contaminants from paints, petroleum,
manufacturing, ect.
■ Off-site disposal or reuse requires sampling
– Soil is found to be polluted, contaminated, or hazardous (lead in
soils from roadway projects or contaminants in concrete)
■ Unrestricted use – later determined to be
contaminated
– Could be worse case scenario for cost and liability
16. Soil Reuse / Disposal
■ Current Regulations
– If soil is “clean” no restrictions on reuse
– RSRs have regulation for reuse of polluted soils
– Contaminated soils need proper disposal at a licensed facility or
possibly landfill (depending upon contaminant concentrations)
■ Proposed Regulations (DRAFT 2008 and 2013)
– Revising Solid Waste Management Regulations to clarify “clean fill”
definition and establish “regulated / recyclable fill”
– Establish permits for reuse facilities (soil, brick, asphalt, concrete)
– Create General Permit for Beneficial Use (to allow reuse as road
sub-base, reuse in asphalt, as land cover, etc)
17. Avoid Complications
Know your project area
Decide if pre-characterization is necessary
If contamination is observed – call a professional
Stockpile responsibly – do not mix concrete, asphalt, or
contaminated soils
Have proper stockpile bins and E&S controls
If you encounter contaminated soils and need to
stockpile more than 45 days you will need the permit
Identify disposal / reuse options
Determine what waste characterization sampling may be
necessary
Consider indemnification agreement for off-site reuse
19. Breakfast Seminar Series
EH&S Regulatory Updates
September 26, 2017 Middletown, Connecticut
Kevin McCarthy, Project Manager
Hazardous Building Materials
20. Agenda – Regulatory Updates
■ Soil Management
■ Hazardous Building Materials
■ Environment Compliance Updates
■ Safety and Health Updates
■ Property Transactions
22. Hazardous Building Materials
– Regulatory Compliance Required for Public and
Private Sectors
– Two Areas of Compliance
» Operations and Management (O&M) of Existing In-
Place Materials
» Management (Abatement) during
Renovation/Demolition
– Regulators
» EPA (Enforced by CTDEEP) – For Now
» CTDPH
» OSHA
23. Asbestos Containing Materials
– Renovation and Demolition
» EPA NESHAP Regulations
» EPA ASHARA Regulations
» CTDPH Standards for Asbestos Abatement
» CTDPH Licensing and Training Requirements for
Persons Engaged in Asbestos Abatement and
Consultation Services
» OSHA Asbestos in Construction
– Operations and Maintenance
» OSHA Asbestos in General Industry
24. Asbestos Containing Materials
■ Is your Building Subject to an Inspection Prior to
Renovation or Demolition?
– Yes - Any structure (regardless of building age) requires a
survey
– Used to confirm or deny the presence of asbestos containing
materials
– All building materials are suspected asbestos containing
materials (Exemption – wood, glass, fiberglass, metal, and
plastic)
■ Is your Building Subject to an Operations and
Management Plan?
– Maybe – Any structure constructed prior to 1980
25. Lead Based Paint
– Mainly regulated in child-occupied building or target
housing by EPA RRP Rule, HUD Lead-Safe Housing
Rule, and CTDPH Lead Poisoning Prevention and
Control regulations
– EPA RCRA regulations
» Disposal limit for hazardous lead waste vs.
general construction and demolition waste
– OSHA Lead in Construction
» Worker Protection
» Hazard Communication
27. PCB Containing Building Materials
■ Regulated by EPA and CTDEEP
– EPA regulates source materials at ≥50 ppm and adjacent materials
contaminated by source materials at >1 ppm
– CTDEEP regulates ALL materials at > 1 ppm
■ Never authorized by EPA or CTDEEP for use
– Highly unlikely to be authorized
– Only continued use of PCBs is within closed containers
(transformers)
■ Testing
– Test if there is a planned renovation or demolition project which will
disturb suspect PCBs containing building materials and result in
disposal of suspect materials
– Air testing to determine if a potential problem exists
28. Top Three Things Regulators Look For
■ #1 O&M Plan
– OSHA Facility Audits
– Written Plan
– Employee Training Documentation
■ #2 Waste Disposal
– Properly Characterized
– Properly Containerized and Stored On-Site
– Disposed of In-Time
– Signed Disposal Records
■ #3 Inappropriate Removal
– Disturbance of Asbestos-Containing Materials
– CTDPH Site Visit
– Clean-Up Requirements
39. Air Emissions
■ Maximum Allowable Stack Concentrations
– Property line distance
– Chemical Constituents
■ Take advantage of Permits-By-Rule
– Boilers
– Generators
– Spray Booths
– Coating Operations
40. Clean Water Act – Section 505
■ …authorizes citizens to bring suit in the federal
district courts against "any person who is alleged
to be in violation of (A) an effluent standard or
limitation … or (B) an order issued by the [EPA]
Administrator or a State with respect to such a
standard or limitation…."
■ This provision allows citizens to sue for violations
of the terms and conditions set forth in wastewater
discharge permits issued under the national
pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES)
program.
41. ■ Protect Yourself
– Google Maps Must Be Your Friend!
– Street Appeal
What is this discharge??
Clean Water Act – Section 505
42. Top Five Things Regulators Look For
■ #1 Accurate Inventory
– Inaccurate amounts can lead to issues with other programs
■ #2 All Air Emission Sources
– Facility Wide Inventories and MASC Compliance
■ #3 Up-to-date SDS
– Purchased and manufactured substances
■ #4 Testing Data
– For chemical concentrations
■ #5 NET DMR
– Activist Groups Copied
44. Breakfast Seminar Series
EH&S Regulatory Updates
September 26, 2017 Middletown, CT
David Horowitz, P.E., CSP - Project Manager
Safety & Health
45. Regulatory Updates – Safety & Health
■ Respirable Crystalline Silica
■ Walking & Working Surfaces
■ OSHA Top Ten Most Cited
46. Regulatory Updates – Safety & Health
■ Respirable Crystalline Silica
– Issue Date: March 25, 2016 / Effective Date: June 23, 2016
– Compliance Dates:
» Construction: Sept. 23, 2017 / General Industry: June 23, 2018
– Highlights:
» New P.E.L. of 50 µg/m3 / 8 hour shift
(1/2 Prior Limit in General Industry / 5 times lower in Construction)
» New Action Level of 25 µg/m3 / 8 hour shift
» Requires initial, in some cases follow-up, exposure monitoring
» Requires engineering controls and work practices
» Requires development of an Exposure Control Plan
» Must consider designated list of controls
47. Regulatory Updates – Safety & Health
■ Respirable Crystalline Silica – Case Studies
– Abrasive Products Manufacturer
» Exposure concerns
– Visual observations appeared to warrant concern
» Personal and area sampling
» Average 0.15 µg/m3
– Paper Processing Facility
» Exposure concerns
– Again, visual observations appeared to warrant concern
» Personal and area sampling
» Average 0.02 µg/m3
48. Regulatory Updates – Safety & Health
■ Walking & Working Surfaces & Fall Protection
– Effective January 17, 2017
» Exposed workers trained on fall hazards (May 17, 2017)
» Inspection/certification permanent anchorages for rope descent systems
(November 20, 2017)
» Installing personal fall arrest or ladder safety systems on new fixed
ladders over 24 feet and on replacement ladders/ladder sections
(November 19, 2018)
» Existing fixed ladders over 24 feet are equipped with a cage, well,
personal fall arrest system, or ladder safety system (November 19,
2018)
» Replacing cages and wells with ladder safety or personal fall arrest
systems on all fixed ladders over 24 feet (November 18, 2036)
49. Planning for 2018 – Safety & Health
■ Annual Safety & Health Requirements
– Post OSHA 300A Log: Post from Feb 1 → through April 30
– Initial Training:
» LoTo, Emergency Action Plan, HazCom, PPE, Hearing Protection…
– Refresher Training:
» Annual: Hearing Protection, Respirators, Access to Medical Records…
» 3-Year: Powered Industrial Trucks
– Mandatory Program Reviews:
» Exposure Control Plan (BB Pathogens), Confined Space, LoTo….
– Annual Evaluations:
» Audiograms, Respirator Fit Tests
– Process Changes:
» Training, Program Updates, Hazard Reviews, PPE Assessments…
62. Top Things Regulators Look For
1. Federal OSHA Exempt Facilities?
State and Municipal Employees?
» Subject to: Connecticut Department of Labor's
Division of Occupational Safety and Health (CONN-OSHA)
2. Federal / Local Emphasis Programs
» Fall Protection
» Fork Trucks
» Amputations
» Process Safety...
3. Employee Complaints & Injuries
4. High Risk & High Injury Rate Facilities / Operations
64. Breakfast Seminar Series
Property Transactions
September 26, 2017 Middletown, CT
James T. Olsen, LEP Vice President
Reducing Risk from Past Activities
65. Agenda
■ Regulatory Programs
■ Environmental Due Diligence
■ Common types of contaminants
■ Common sources of contaminants
■ LEP Program
■ Examples
66. Regulatory Programs
■ CT Property Transfer Program
– Dry Cleaner (after 1967)
– Autobody Shop (after 1967)
– Furniture Stripper (after 1967)
– Hazardous Waste Generator (>100 kg/Kg per month) since 1980
■ Voluntary Remediation Program
– “Voluntary Basis”
– -133x
– -133y
■ Underground Storage Tank Program
■ Significant Environmental Hazard Notification
■ CT Property Transfer Program
– Dry Cleaner (after 1967)
– Autobody Shop (after 1967)
– Furniture Stripper (after 1967)
– Hazardous Waste Generator (>100 kg/Kg per month) since 1980
■ Voluntary Remediation Program
– “Voluntary Basis”
– -133x
– -133y
■ Underground Storage Tank Program
■ Significant Environmental Hazard Notification
67. Regulatory Programs
■ RCRA Correction Action Program
– Large Quantity Generators
– TSDFs
■ Brownfields Programs
– BRRP
– ABC
– Municipal Liability Relief
■ Environmental Construction Project
69. Environmental Due Diligence
■ Phase I ESA
■ All Appropriate Inquiry
■ Phase II ESA
■ Phase III ESA
■ Remedial Action Plan
■ Ecological Risk Assessment
■ Remediation
■ Remedial Action Report
■ LEP Verification
70. Environmental Due Diligence
■ Environmental Due Diligence protects buyer and
seller
■ Environmental cleanups are costly and time
consuming
■ CTDEEP generally holds current owner
responsible for site contamination unless defined
otherwise under the PTP
■ Conducting investigations early in process allows
for better planning resulting in reduced costs and
schedule impacts
74. LEP Program
■ LEPs have ability to “Verify” sites have been
investigated and remediated according to CTDEEP
requirements
■ Site Characterization Guidance Document
■ Remediation Standard Regulations
■ CTDEEP can audit LEP Verifications
Intro – most of you know me through my Brownfield work. For the most part my work deals with heavily contaminated soils – but today my talk will focus around soil stockpiling for general excavation projects.
Here are the topics I will cover
Every municipality, institution, or expanding facility has generated excess soils as a result of development or infrastructure improvements. For the most part – these are stockpiled somewhere sometimes temporarily or in some cases maintained over many years in a particular location like a DPW or facilities yard.
Pre-planning can be important to avoid delays or cost over-runs. Decisions need to made on whether to pre-characterize soils slated for excavation based on history of site or if you can reasonably assume no contamination will be present. Even if soils appear clean upon excavation – there may still be a requirement to sample for waste characterization if the soil will be sent off-site such as to a disposal facility, landfill, or private property. Sometimes it is ultimately based on the generator’s risk / liability tolerance. How sure are you that it is clean before you allow unrestricted use or should there be some indemnification requirements on the part of the generator.
So first let’s define what’s considered “clean” soil. CTDEEP’s definition of soil says natural soil.
Polluted soils
Contaminated soils (this one I made up – not official definition)
Hazardous is defined by RCRA – but I won’t be talking about this one much as regulations governing generation of hazardous soils are pretty clear and typically if your on a site where you might encounter hazardous soils hopefully you have retained an LEP for guidance.
But if doing your typical projects where your not working on or near a hazardous waste site and you excavate soils assumed to be clean – is there a requirement to sample? Well in Connecticut the regulations are not very clear. According to DEEP if you are excavating and come across obvious contamination there is a requirement to segregate and sample that material under RSRs however, RSRs do not apply to every property. If you do not identify contamination and will be re-using excavated soil on-site there is not a requirement to sample. In cases where excavated soils will be sent off-site for disposal or reuse – there may be a requirement to sample. This is typically driven by the receiving facility or sometimes the generators risk / liability tolerance. Remember that soil can be taken by the contractor and placed at a school. This happened recently on one of my projects recently where a contractor brought in clean fill on a school project.
The fill met CTDOT spec for clean fill, but contained asphalt, brick, and concrete. Under CTDEEP clean fill can have brick, asphalt, and concrete, but it has to be inert (no leachable contaminants) We tested the material and it came back contaminated with petroleum components exceeding RSR criteria. It was a large amount of material that caused delays and cost over runs.
In Connecticut here are the major regulations that pertain to soils and wastes such as asphalt, concrete, brick generated from excavations. There is overlap and plenty of gray area on the first three with regard to requirements for sampling. In general, the remainder of my talk will be focused on regulations for stockpiling contaminated soils and how to properly dispose or reuse these soils.
The RSRs govern soil remediation requirements for contaminated properties – legally they only apply to sites in formal DEEP programs, however, DEEP does encourage everyone to follow the RSRs.
I will also cover incidental excavation wastes such as concrete, asphalt, and brick which by definition along with soil is also “solid waste” under state regulations.
Again I threw in hazardous waste regulations but as mentioned before I won’t be going into much detail on this.
Under CT General permit – here is the definition of contaminated soil – determined or reasonably expected… Still no requirement to sample and defers to RSRs.
Permit applies to these scenarios:
Here are some of the conditions. If less than 1K cy on-site no registration needed to be submitted but need to comply with permit protocols
All the qualifying conditions require the permit be registered with CTDEEP.
Approval of the registration is require if over 10K cy (on site or off site). Also need O&M Plan.
If area in APA then need notification to local agency
These permits expire after 2 years but can be renewed.
The general permit also has requirements for the amount of incidental excavation waste that can be stored. Again incidental wastes include asphalt, brick, concrete, but could include wood or other items. Keep in mind if these incidental waste quantities or timeframes for general permit (two years) are exceeded – you could qualify as a solid waste facility – overlap in regulations.
The most common contaminant issues we encounter with regard to excavation stockpiles from areas that area assumed to be “clean” are things like pesticides which you can’t see, and having asphalt, brick or concrete mixed in. Asphalt contains petroleum compounds and the RSR standards for many of these are as low as 1 part per million. Concrete and brick can sometimes contain contamination from lead or PCB containing paints or absorb chemicals or petroleum from industrial operations.
Mixed with soils – these can turn clean soils into polluted, contaminated, or even hazardous soils.
You sometimes don’t find out until you are trying to get rid of the stuff. This can then snow ball into a bigger problem with project delays, cost over runs, or worse – liability. If it turns out that your soil contaminated someone else’s property or now threatens public health – you could have CTDEEP involvement.
So how do you get rid of this stuff. Well that’s pretty cut and dry. If it’s “clean” there are no restrictions on reuse.
If it is polluted then RSRs should be followed
If soil is contaminated (above RSRs) then need to dispose at a licensed disposal facility or landfill permitted to accept.
DEEP does realize the burden imposed by current regulations as they do not readily allow for beneficial reuse of polluted soils, asphalt, brick and concrete. They have attempted two times to draft revisions to current regulations. These revisions include:
I had lengthy conversations with many DEEP division directors last week about this topic and it doesn’t look like these revisions will occur anytime soon. There has been push back suggesting that DEEP would be promoting the use of know impacted material with little oversight.
So for each of you in this room who are involved with excavation projects here is my checklist. Know your project area. If your doing utility or roadwork near a former industrial site, gas station, or dry cleaner then maybe you want to pre-characterize. I have had luck getting responsible parties to fund the soil disposal.
If you have no reason to believe soils will be impacted then you may not need to pre-characterize, but if you do encounter contamination when digging you should call in a consultant to provide support.
Always have your contractor stockpile responsibly – don’t mix the waste streams and have proper stockpiling protocols.
If you are dealing with contaminated soils then you will need the General Permit
Identify your disposal reuse options so you can determine what if any waste characterization sampling may be needed. For petroleum impacted soils – if you know came from heating oil can sometimes be accepted to a facility based on knowledge – no sampling required.
If the soil is going to be reused off-site, whether it is tested or not, clean or not, consider getting an indemnification agreement from end user.