SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
Download to read offline
Natureview Farm – A Case Study
Background:
What is Natureview Farm?
 Founded in 1989, Natureview Farm Inc. was a small yoghurt manufacturer.
 It manufactured and marketed refrigerated cup yogurt under the Natureview Farm brand name.
 The yoghurt was manufactured at the Natureview Farm production facility in Cabot, Vermont.
Authorities to Consider:
Vice President, Marketing - Christine Walker (Protagonist)
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) - Barry Landers
Chief Financial Officer (CFO) - Jim Wagner
Vice President, Sales - Walter Bellini
Vice President, Operations - Jack Gottlieb
Assistant Marketing Director - Kelly Riley
Status of Natureview Farm’s Market:
Products (By 2000) - 12 flavours of refrigerated yogurt - 8-oz. cups (86% revenue)
- 4 flavours of refrigerated yogurt - 32-oz. cups (14% revenue)
Revenue (1999) - $13 million
Net Income - $260,000 (2% of revenue)
Market Share in natural foods channel - 24%
Key Strengths and Differentiating Factors:
* Emphasis on ingredients and a strong reputation for producing yogurts of high quality and great taste.
* The yogurt recipe used natural ingredients and a special process that gave the yogurt its unique smooth, creamy texture
without the artificial thickeners.
* The company used milk from cows untreated with rGBH, an artificial growth hormone that increases milk production.
* The yogurt’s average shelf life was 50 days, which was 20 days more than most of its large competitors’ products.
* Applies low cost “guerrilla marketing” tactics.
* Developed strong relationships with leading natural food retailers.
Challenge – Adopting a marketing strategy to grow revenues by over 50% and reach $20 million, before the end of 2001.
Current Trends:
 Natureview Farm has started exploring multipack yogurt products (children’s 4-oz. cups and yogurt packed in tubes).
 The organic food market, worth $6.5 billion in 1999, was predicted to grow to $13.3 billion in 2003.
 In 1999, the total U.S. retail sales of refrigerated yogurt reached $1.8 billion and sales volume was just over 2. billion units.
 Yogurt sales through supermarkets had grown an average of 3% per year, while sales through natural food stores had grown 20% per
year.
 46% of organic food consumers bought organic products at supermarket, 25% at a small health foods store, and 29% at a natural
foods supermarket.
 Yogurt was consumed by approx. 40% of the U.S. population, with women comprising the majority (over 70%) of the yogurt
purchases.
 Regarding consumer product preferences, 6 and 8- oz. yogurt cups were the most popular product sizes, representing 74% of total
category supermarket sales in U.S. dollars.
 The next largest segment- multipacks- represented 9% of category sales and was growing by more than 12.5% per year.
 The 32-oz. size products represented 8% of the sales and was growing at a modest 2%.
Costs:
For Supermarket Channel:
Broker fee – 4% of manufacturer’s sales
Distributor mark-up margin – 15%
Retailer mark-up margin – 27%
Slotting fee - $ 10,000 per SKU per retail chain
Advertisement costs – Northeast, Midwest and Southeast U.S. - $7,500
Western U.S. - $15,000
Price:
Manufacturer
Distributor
Retailer
Customer
Supermarket Channel Average Retail Price
8-oz. cup $ 0.74
32-oz. cup $ 2.70
4-oz. cup multipack $ 2.85
For Natural Foods Channel: Manufacturer
Natural Foods Wholesaler
Natural Foods Distributor
Retailer
Customer
Wholesaler mark-up margin – 7%
Distributor mark-up margin – 9%
Retailer mark-up margin – 35%
No slotting fees
Natural Foods Channel Average Retail price
8-oz. cup $ 0.88
32-oz. cup $ 3.19
4-oz. cup multipack $ 3.35
Option 1:
Expand six SKUs of the 8-oz. product line into one or two selected supermarket regions.
Analysis:
Retailer’s Selling Price = $ 0.74
Retailer’s mark-up margin = 27%
Retailer’s cost price = Distributor’s selling price = $ 0.74 x (1-0.27) = $ 0.54
Distributor’s mark-up margin = 15%
Distributor’s cost price = $ 0.54 x (1-0.15) = $ 0.46
Yogurt manufacturing cost = $ 0.31
Manufacturer’s mark-up margin = ($ 0.46- $ 0.31)/$ 0.46 x 100 = 33%
 Sales = 35,000,000 units
 Revenue = 35,000,000 x $ 0.46 = $ 16,100,000
 Manufacturing cost = 35,000,000 x $ 0.31 = $ 10,850,000
 Number of regions = 2 (north-eastern and western regions)
 Advertising cost = $1.2 million per region per year
 Total advertising cost = $ 1,200,000 x 2 = $ 2,400,000
 SG & A costs = $ 320,000
 Broker’s fee = $ 16,100,000 x 4% = $644,000
 Slotting fee = $ 10,000 per SKU per retail chain
 Number of supermarket retails = 20 (11 in North-east and 9 in the West)
 Total slotting fee = $ 10,000 x 6 x 20 = $ 1,200,000
2000 2001
 Sales = 35,000,000 x 1.2 = 42,000,000 units
 Revenue = 42,000,000 x $ 0.46 = $ 19,320,000
 Manufacturing cost = 42,000,000 x $ 0.31 = $ 13,020,000
 Number of regions = 2 (north-eastern and western regions)
 Advertising cost = $1.2 million per region per year
 Total advertising cost = $ 1,200,000 x 2 = $ 2,400,000
 SG & A costs = $ 640,000
 Broker’s fee = $ 19,320,000 x 4% = $772,800
2000: 2001:
Total expenses = $ 15,414,000 Total expenses = $ 16,832,800
Net profit = $ 686,000 Net profit = $ 2,487,200
PROS:
 Significant potential for revenue growth as 8-oz. cup has the largest unit share among refrigerated yogurts.
 Unique position of market to capitalize on the growing trend in natural and organic foods in supermarkets.
 Due to heavy competition, the first organic foods brand to enter the supermarket could have a significant advantage.
 Offering more organic products at supermarkets could attract higher-income, less price sensitive customers, there by the
company has the leverage to increase profits.
CONS:
 Entering into supermarket segment could adversely affect the strong relationships with natural foods retailers.
 Natureview may not have the necessary skill set or resources to expand effectively into supermarkets.
 Expenditure on marketing and promotions would be high.
Option 2:
Expand four SKUs of the 32-oz. size product line nationally.
Analysis:
Retailer’s Selling Price = $ 2.70
Retailer’s mark-up margin = 27%
Retailer’s cost price = Distributor’s selling price = $ 2.70 x (1-0.27) = $ 1.97
Distributor’s mark-up margin = 15%
Distributor’s cost price = $ 1.97 x (1-0.15) = $ 1.67
Yogurt manufacturing cost = $ 0.99
Manufacturer’s mark-up margin = ($ 1.67- $ 0.99)/$ 1.67 x 100 = 41%
2000 2001
 Sales = 5,500,000 units
 Revenue = 5,500,000 x $ 1.67 = $ 9,185,000
 Manufacturing cost = 5,500,000 x $ 0.99 = $ 5,445,000
 Number of regions = 4(nationally)
 Advertising cost = $ 120,000 per region per year
 Total advertising cost = $ 120,000 x 4 = $ 480,000
 SG & A costs = $ 320,000
 Broker’s fee = $ 16,100,000 x 4% = $ 367,400
 Sales = 5,500,000 units
 Revenue = 5,500,000 x $ 1.67 = $ 9,185,000
 Manufacturing cost = 5,500,000 x $ 0.99 = $ 5,445,000
 Number of regions = 4 (nationally)
 Marketing expenses = $120,000 per region per year
 Total marketing expenses = $ 120,000 x 4 = $ 480,000
 SG & A costs = $ 160,000
 Broker’s fee = $ 9,185,000 x 4% = $ 367,400
 Slotting fee = $ 10,000 per SKU per retail chain
 Number of supermarket retails = 64
 Total slotting fee = $ 10,000 x 4 x 64 = $ 2,560,000
2000: 2001:
Net Expenses = $ 9,012,400 Net Expenses = $ 6,612,400
Net profit = $ 172,600 Net profit = $ 2,572,600
PROS:
 32-oz. cups generate an above-average gross profit margin for Natureview (43.6%).
 Fewer competition in this segment, and Natureview products have advantage of longer shelf life.
 Promotional expenses and marketing expenses will be lower.
CONS:
 Entering into supermarket segment could adversely affect the strong relationships with natural foods retailers.
 Natureview may not have the necessary skill set or resources to expand effectively into supermarkets.
 New users may not readily buy the product because of its multi-use size.
 Full national distribution in 12 months is doubtful.
 Need salesman who have the experience selling to sophisticated supermarket channels.
Option 3:
Introduce two SKUs of a children’s multi-pack into natural foods channel.
Analysis:
Retailer’s Selling Price = $ 3.35
Retailer’s mark-up margin = 35%
Retailer’s cost price = Distributor’s selling price = $ 3.35 x (1-0.65) = $ 2.18
Distributor’s mark-up margin = 9%
Distributor’s cost price = Natural food wholesalers’ = $ 2.18 x (1-0.09) = $ 1.98
selling price
Natural food wholesalers’ mark-up margin = 7%
Natural food wholesalers’ cost price = 1.98 x (1-0.07) = $ 1.84
Yogurt manufacturing cost = $ 1.15
Manufacturer’s mark-up margin = ($ 1.84- $ 1.15)/$ 1.84 x 100 = 41%
2000 2001
 Sales = 1,800,000 x 1.15 = 2,070,000 units
 Revenue = 2,070,000 x $ 1.84 = $ 3,808,000
 Manufacturing cost = 2,070,000 x $ 1.15 = $ 2,380,500
 Total marketing expenses = $ 250,000
 Complimentary cases = $ 3,808,000 x 2.5% = $ 95,220
 Sales = 1,800,000 units
 Revenue = 1,800,000 x $ 1.84 = $ 3,312,000
 Manufacturing cost = 1,800,000 x $ 1.15 = $ 2,070,000
 Total marketing expenses = $ 250,000
 Complimentary cases = $ 3,312,000 x 2.5% = $ 82,800
2000: 2001:
Net Expenses = $ 2,402,800 Net Expenses = $ 2,725,720
Net profit = $ 909,200 Net profit = $ 1,083,080
PROS:
 Natureview Farm’s all-natural ingredients would provide the perfect positioning from which to launch its own
children’s multi-pack product offering into their core sales channel.
 The financial potential was very attractive. Gross profitability of the line would be 37.6%
 Lower sales and marketing expenses, and no slotting or broker expenses.
 Natural food channel was growing almost 7 times faster than the supermarket channel.
CONS:
 Natural foods channel would soon make demands much like those expected from supermarkets.
 The opportunities for expansion would be lesser when compared to those in supermarkets.
RECOMMENDATION:
Combine Options 1 and 3 and implement them together.
 Introduction of 8-oz. yogurt into the supermarket channel will lead to high revenues.
 As major natural food competitors would soon try to enter supermarkets, entering the segment first would enhance authenticity and brand
equity.
 Combining both the options would require more SG & A employees.
Calculated combined Net Profit (2000) = $ 686,000 (Option 1) + $ 909,200 (Option 3)
= $ 1,595,200
A part of the revenue ( ~ $ 500,000) can be used to employ more number of staffs to handle increased responsibilities.
Expected Net Profit (2000) = $ 1,005,200
Expected Net Profit (2001) = $ 2,487,200 (Option 1) + $ 1,083,080 (Option 3) - $ 500,000 = $ 3,430,280
 The company should realise the importance of sustaining its strong relationship with natural foods retailers by introducing children’s multi-
pack products. It also increases the revenue of the company.
 As the natural food channel was growing at a rate 7 times faster than supermarket channel, the potential future benefits of having a position
in the natural foods segment could be significant.
 Besides, if the supermarket product fails due to over expenditure, inefficient employees, etc. the company can shift its focus to the natural
foods retail products. Vice versa, if the natural foods segment faces hindrances such a increased demands from retailers, it can always shift its
attention to the supermarket segment.
 Option 2 is not preferred as there is not guarantee that the company would be able to expand nationally in a span of 12 months, and have
sufficient marketing and sales expertise to advertise the products effectively in such a short interval. It is also expensive and the potential
losses the company would incur if the segment fails could be large.

More Related Content

What's hot

Natureview case analysis
Natureview case analysisNatureview case analysis
Natureview case analysisAbhay Upadhyay
 
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farm
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farmHarvard business school case study -Nature view farm
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farmManu Tyagi
 
Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case
Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School CaseNatureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case
Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School CaseAnmol Agrawal
 
Natureview Farm Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm Harvard Case StudyNatureview Farm Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm Harvard Case StudyKUNAL GUPTA
 
The Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
The Fashion Channel - A case AnalysisThe Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
The Fashion Channel - A case AnalysisDevanand Hariperumal
 
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case StudyNatureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case StudySanthosh Kumar
 
Natureview Farm Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Case AnalysisNatureview Farm Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Case AnalysisSarthak Anand
 
Natureview Farm Harvard Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Harvard Case AnalysisNatureview Farm Harvard Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Harvard Case AnalysisRaghav Maheshwari
 
Natureview farm-A Hbr Case Study
Natureview farm-A Hbr Case StudyNatureview farm-A Hbr Case Study
Natureview farm-A Hbr Case StudyPrashant Ojha
 

What's hot (20)

Natureview case analysis
Natureview case analysisNatureview case analysis
Natureview case analysis
 
NATUREVIEW FARM
NATUREVIEW FARMNATUREVIEW FARM
NATUREVIEW FARM
 
Natureview Farm
Natureview FarmNatureview Farm
Natureview Farm
 
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farm
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farmHarvard business school case study -Nature view farm
Harvard business school case study -Nature view farm
 
Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case
Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School CaseNatureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case
Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case
 
Natureview Farm Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm Harvard Case StudyNatureview Farm Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm Harvard Case Study
 
The Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
The Fashion Channel - A case AnalysisThe Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
The Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
 
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case StudyNatureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
 
Truearth
TruearthTruearth
Truearth
 
Tru earth
Tru earthTru earth
Tru earth
 
Natureview Farm Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Case AnalysisNatureview Farm Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Case Analysis
 
Tru earth
Tru earthTru earth
Tru earth
 
Metabical
MetabicalMetabical
Metabical
 
Truearth Healthy Foods
Truearth Healthy FoodsTruearth Healthy Foods
Truearth Healthy Foods
 
Natureview farm case analysis
Natureview farm case analysis Natureview farm case analysis
Natureview farm case analysis
 
Signode case study
Signode case studySignode case study
Signode case study
 
Natureview Farm Harvard Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Harvard Case AnalysisNatureview Farm Harvard Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Harvard Case Analysis
 
Natureview farm-A Hbr Case Study
Natureview farm-A Hbr Case StudyNatureview farm-A Hbr Case Study
Natureview farm-A Hbr Case Study
 
Nature view farm
Nature view farmNature view farm
Nature view farm
 
TruEarth Healthy Food
TruEarth Healthy FoodTruEarth Healthy Food
TruEarth Healthy Food
 

Similar to Natureview farm – A case study

Natureview Farm Case Study
Natureview Farm Case StudyNatureview Farm Case Study
Natureview Farm Case StudyAnuj Prajapati
 
Nature view farm
Nature view farmNature view farm
Nature view farmsatishroy93
 
Natureview HBR Case Study
Natureview HBR Case StudyNatureview HBR Case Study
Natureview HBR Case StudyNeel Kapoor
 
The NatureView Farm Case Study
The NatureView Farm Case StudyThe NatureView Farm Case Study
The NatureView Farm Case StudyAyush Gupta
 
NatureView Farm Case Study
NatureView Farm Case StudyNatureView Farm Case Study
NatureView Farm Case StudyRohan Roy
 
Natureview farm Harvard Business Case study
Natureview farm Harvard Business Case studyNatureview farm Harvard Business Case study
Natureview farm Harvard Business Case studyanshu bhatia
 
Hbr case study_nature_view
Hbr case study_nature_viewHbr case study_nature_view
Hbr case study_nature_viewPooja Preeti
 
Natureview Harvard Business case
Natureview Harvard Business caseNatureview Harvard Business case
Natureview Harvard Business caseYashwanth Adidala
 
Nature view farm case study
Nature view farm case studyNature view farm case study
Nature view farm case studyRishi Bansal
 
Natureview Farm Harward Business Case Study
Natureview Farm Harward Business Case StudyNatureview Farm Harward Business Case Study
Natureview Farm Harward Business Case StudyMayankUpadhyay32
 
Natureview farm inc.
Natureview farm inc.Natureview farm inc.
Natureview farm inc.Tanumoy Ghosh
 
Natureview case study
Natureview case studyNatureview case study
Natureview case studyManvi Singh
 

Similar to Natureview farm – A case study (20)

Natureview Farm Case Study
Natureview Farm Case StudyNatureview Farm Case Study
Natureview Farm Case Study
 
Natureview
NatureviewNatureview
Natureview
 
Nature view farm
Nature view farmNature view farm
Nature view farm
 
Natureview HBR Case Study
Natureview HBR Case StudyNatureview HBR Case Study
Natureview HBR Case Study
 
The NatureView Farm Case Study
The NatureView Farm Case StudyThe NatureView Farm Case Study
The NatureView Farm Case Study
 
NatureView Farm Case Study
NatureView Farm Case StudyNatureView Farm Case Study
NatureView Farm Case Study
 
Natureview farm
Natureview farmNatureview farm
Natureview farm
 
Natureview farm Harvard Business Case study
Natureview farm Harvard Business Case studyNatureview farm Harvard Business Case study
Natureview farm Harvard Business Case study
 
Hbr case study_nature_view
Hbr case study_nature_viewHbr case study_nature_view
Hbr case study_nature_view
 
Natureview Farm
Natureview FarmNatureview Farm
Natureview Farm
 
Natureview case study
Natureview case studyNatureview case study
Natureview case study
 
Natureview case study
Natureview case studyNatureview case study
Natureview case study
 
Natureview Harvard Business case
Natureview Harvard Business caseNatureview Harvard Business case
Natureview Harvard Business case
 
Natureview farm
Natureview farmNatureview farm
Natureview farm
 
Nature view farm case study
Nature view farm case studyNature view farm case study
Nature view farm case study
 
Natureview farm
Natureview farmNatureview farm
Natureview farm
 
Natureview Farm Harward Business Case Study
Natureview Farm Harward Business Case StudyNatureview Farm Harward Business Case Study
Natureview Farm Harward Business Case Study
 
Natureview farm inc.
Natureview farm inc.Natureview farm inc.
Natureview farm inc.
 
Natureview case study
Natureview case studyNatureview case study
Natureview case study
 
Natureview farm case study
Natureview farm case studyNatureview farm case study
Natureview farm case study
 

Recently uploaded

Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayQuarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayMakMakNepo
 
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptxJudging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptxSherlyMaeNeri
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatYousafMalik24
 
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementHierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementmkooblal
 
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxGrade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxChelloAnnAsuncion2
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxEyham Joco
 
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Celine George
 
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomnelietumpap1
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxRaymartEstabillo3
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for BeginnersSabitha Banu
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfphamnguyenenglishnb
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfUjwalaBharambe
 
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPHow to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayQuarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
 
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
 
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptxJudging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
 
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementHierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
 
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxGrade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptxRaw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
 
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
 
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
 
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
 
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
 
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPHow to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
 

Natureview farm – A case study

  • 1. Natureview Farm – A Case Study
  • 2. Background: What is Natureview Farm?  Founded in 1989, Natureview Farm Inc. was a small yoghurt manufacturer.  It manufactured and marketed refrigerated cup yogurt under the Natureview Farm brand name.  The yoghurt was manufactured at the Natureview Farm production facility in Cabot, Vermont. Authorities to Consider: Vice President, Marketing - Christine Walker (Protagonist) Chief Executive Officer (CEO) - Barry Landers Chief Financial Officer (CFO) - Jim Wagner Vice President, Sales - Walter Bellini Vice President, Operations - Jack Gottlieb Assistant Marketing Director - Kelly Riley
  • 3. Status of Natureview Farm’s Market: Products (By 2000) - 12 flavours of refrigerated yogurt - 8-oz. cups (86% revenue) - 4 flavours of refrigerated yogurt - 32-oz. cups (14% revenue) Revenue (1999) - $13 million Net Income - $260,000 (2% of revenue) Market Share in natural foods channel - 24% Key Strengths and Differentiating Factors: * Emphasis on ingredients and a strong reputation for producing yogurts of high quality and great taste. * The yogurt recipe used natural ingredients and a special process that gave the yogurt its unique smooth, creamy texture without the artificial thickeners. * The company used milk from cows untreated with rGBH, an artificial growth hormone that increases milk production. * The yogurt’s average shelf life was 50 days, which was 20 days more than most of its large competitors’ products. * Applies low cost “guerrilla marketing” tactics. * Developed strong relationships with leading natural food retailers.
  • 4. Challenge – Adopting a marketing strategy to grow revenues by over 50% and reach $20 million, before the end of 2001. Current Trends:  Natureview Farm has started exploring multipack yogurt products (children’s 4-oz. cups and yogurt packed in tubes).  The organic food market, worth $6.5 billion in 1999, was predicted to grow to $13.3 billion in 2003.  In 1999, the total U.S. retail sales of refrigerated yogurt reached $1.8 billion and sales volume was just over 2. billion units.  Yogurt sales through supermarkets had grown an average of 3% per year, while sales through natural food stores had grown 20% per year.  46% of organic food consumers bought organic products at supermarket, 25% at a small health foods store, and 29% at a natural foods supermarket.  Yogurt was consumed by approx. 40% of the U.S. population, with women comprising the majority (over 70%) of the yogurt purchases.  Regarding consumer product preferences, 6 and 8- oz. yogurt cups were the most popular product sizes, representing 74% of total category supermarket sales in U.S. dollars.  The next largest segment- multipacks- represented 9% of category sales and was growing by more than 12.5% per year.  The 32-oz. size products represented 8% of the sales and was growing at a modest 2%.
  • 5. Costs: For Supermarket Channel: Broker fee – 4% of manufacturer’s sales Distributor mark-up margin – 15% Retailer mark-up margin – 27% Slotting fee - $ 10,000 per SKU per retail chain Advertisement costs – Northeast, Midwest and Southeast U.S. - $7,500 Western U.S. - $15,000 Price: Manufacturer Distributor Retailer Customer Supermarket Channel Average Retail Price 8-oz. cup $ 0.74 32-oz. cup $ 2.70 4-oz. cup multipack $ 2.85
  • 6. For Natural Foods Channel: Manufacturer Natural Foods Wholesaler Natural Foods Distributor Retailer Customer Wholesaler mark-up margin – 7% Distributor mark-up margin – 9% Retailer mark-up margin – 35% No slotting fees Natural Foods Channel Average Retail price 8-oz. cup $ 0.88 32-oz. cup $ 3.19 4-oz. cup multipack $ 3.35
  • 7. Option 1: Expand six SKUs of the 8-oz. product line into one or two selected supermarket regions. Analysis: Retailer’s Selling Price = $ 0.74 Retailer’s mark-up margin = 27% Retailer’s cost price = Distributor’s selling price = $ 0.74 x (1-0.27) = $ 0.54 Distributor’s mark-up margin = 15% Distributor’s cost price = $ 0.54 x (1-0.15) = $ 0.46 Yogurt manufacturing cost = $ 0.31 Manufacturer’s mark-up margin = ($ 0.46- $ 0.31)/$ 0.46 x 100 = 33%  Sales = 35,000,000 units  Revenue = 35,000,000 x $ 0.46 = $ 16,100,000  Manufacturing cost = 35,000,000 x $ 0.31 = $ 10,850,000  Number of regions = 2 (north-eastern and western regions)  Advertising cost = $1.2 million per region per year  Total advertising cost = $ 1,200,000 x 2 = $ 2,400,000  SG & A costs = $ 320,000  Broker’s fee = $ 16,100,000 x 4% = $644,000  Slotting fee = $ 10,000 per SKU per retail chain  Number of supermarket retails = 20 (11 in North-east and 9 in the West)  Total slotting fee = $ 10,000 x 6 x 20 = $ 1,200,000 2000 2001  Sales = 35,000,000 x 1.2 = 42,000,000 units  Revenue = 42,000,000 x $ 0.46 = $ 19,320,000  Manufacturing cost = 42,000,000 x $ 0.31 = $ 13,020,000  Number of regions = 2 (north-eastern and western regions)  Advertising cost = $1.2 million per region per year  Total advertising cost = $ 1,200,000 x 2 = $ 2,400,000  SG & A costs = $ 640,000  Broker’s fee = $ 19,320,000 x 4% = $772,800
  • 8. 2000: 2001: Total expenses = $ 15,414,000 Total expenses = $ 16,832,800 Net profit = $ 686,000 Net profit = $ 2,487,200 PROS:  Significant potential for revenue growth as 8-oz. cup has the largest unit share among refrigerated yogurts.  Unique position of market to capitalize on the growing trend in natural and organic foods in supermarkets.  Due to heavy competition, the first organic foods brand to enter the supermarket could have a significant advantage.  Offering more organic products at supermarkets could attract higher-income, less price sensitive customers, there by the company has the leverage to increase profits. CONS:  Entering into supermarket segment could adversely affect the strong relationships with natural foods retailers.  Natureview may not have the necessary skill set or resources to expand effectively into supermarkets.  Expenditure on marketing and promotions would be high.
  • 9. Option 2: Expand four SKUs of the 32-oz. size product line nationally. Analysis: Retailer’s Selling Price = $ 2.70 Retailer’s mark-up margin = 27% Retailer’s cost price = Distributor’s selling price = $ 2.70 x (1-0.27) = $ 1.97 Distributor’s mark-up margin = 15% Distributor’s cost price = $ 1.97 x (1-0.15) = $ 1.67 Yogurt manufacturing cost = $ 0.99 Manufacturer’s mark-up margin = ($ 1.67- $ 0.99)/$ 1.67 x 100 = 41% 2000 2001  Sales = 5,500,000 units  Revenue = 5,500,000 x $ 1.67 = $ 9,185,000  Manufacturing cost = 5,500,000 x $ 0.99 = $ 5,445,000  Number of regions = 4(nationally)  Advertising cost = $ 120,000 per region per year  Total advertising cost = $ 120,000 x 4 = $ 480,000  SG & A costs = $ 320,000  Broker’s fee = $ 16,100,000 x 4% = $ 367,400  Sales = 5,500,000 units  Revenue = 5,500,000 x $ 1.67 = $ 9,185,000  Manufacturing cost = 5,500,000 x $ 0.99 = $ 5,445,000  Number of regions = 4 (nationally)  Marketing expenses = $120,000 per region per year  Total marketing expenses = $ 120,000 x 4 = $ 480,000  SG & A costs = $ 160,000  Broker’s fee = $ 9,185,000 x 4% = $ 367,400  Slotting fee = $ 10,000 per SKU per retail chain  Number of supermarket retails = 64  Total slotting fee = $ 10,000 x 4 x 64 = $ 2,560,000
  • 10. 2000: 2001: Net Expenses = $ 9,012,400 Net Expenses = $ 6,612,400 Net profit = $ 172,600 Net profit = $ 2,572,600 PROS:  32-oz. cups generate an above-average gross profit margin for Natureview (43.6%).  Fewer competition in this segment, and Natureview products have advantage of longer shelf life.  Promotional expenses and marketing expenses will be lower. CONS:  Entering into supermarket segment could adversely affect the strong relationships with natural foods retailers.  Natureview may not have the necessary skill set or resources to expand effectively into supermarkets.  New users may not readily buy the product because of its multi-use size.  Full national distribution in 12 months is doubtful.  Need salesman who have the experience selling to sophisticated supermarket channels.
  • 11. Option 3: Introduce two SKUs of a children’s multi-pack into natural foods channel. Analysis: Retailer’s Selling Price = $ 3.35 Retailer’s mark-up margin = 35% Retailer’s cost price = Distributor’s selling price = $ 3.35 x (1-0.65) = $ 2.18 Distributor’s mark-up margin = 9% Distributor’s cost price = Natural food wholesalers’ = $ 2.18 x (1-0.09) = $ 1.98 selling price Natural food wholesalers’ mark-up margin = 7% Natural food wholesalers’ cost price = 1.98 x (1-0.07) = $ 1.84 Yogurt manufacturing cost = $ 1.15 Manufacturer’s mark-up margin = ($ 1.84- $ 1.15)/$ 1.84 x 100 = 41% 2000 2001  Sales = 1,800,000 x 1.15 = 2,070,000 units  Revenue = 2,070,000 x $ 1.84 = $ 3,808,000  Manufacturing cost = 2,070,000 x $ 1.15 = $ 2,380,500  Total marketing expenses = $ 250,000  Complimentary cases = $ 3,808,000 x 2.5% = $ 95,220  Sales = 1,800,000 units  Revenue = 1,800,000 x $ 1.84 = $ 3,312,000  Manufacturing cost = 1,800,000 x $ 1.15 = $ 2,070,000  Total marketing expenses = $ 250,000  Complimentary cases = $ 3,312,000 x 2.5% = $ 82,800
  • 12. 2000: 2001: Net Expenses = $ 2,402,800 Net Expenses = $ 2,725,720 Net profit = $ 909,200 Net profit = $ 1,083,080 PROS:  Natureview Farm’s all-natural ingredients would provide the perfect positioning from which to launch its own children’s multi-pack product offering into their core sales channel.  The financial potential was very attractive. Gross profitability of the line would be 37.6%  Lower sales and marketing expenses, and no slotting or broker expenses.  Natural food channel was growing almost 7 times faster than the supermarket channel. CONS:  Natural foods channel would soon make demands much like those expected from supermarkets.  The opportunities for expansion would be lesser when compared to those in supermarkets.
  • 13. RECOMMENDATION: Combine Options 1 and 3 and implement them together.  Introduction of 8-oz. yogurt into the supermarket channel will lead to high revenues.  As major natural food competitors would soon try to enter supermarkets, entering the segment first would enhance authenticity and brand equity.  Combining both the options would require more SG & A employees. Calculated combined Net Profit (2000) = $ 686,000 (Option 1) + $ 909,200 (Option 3) = $ 1,595,200 A part of the revenue ( ~ $ 500,000) can be used to employ more number of staffs to handle increased responsibilities. Expected Net Profit (2000) = $ 1,005,200 Expected Net Profit (2001) = $ 2,487,200 (Option 1) + $ 1,083,080 (Option 3) - $ 500,000 = $ 3,430,280  The company should realise the importance of sustaining its strong relationship with natural foods retailers by introducing children’s multi- pack products. It also increases the revenue of the company.  As the natural food channel was growing at a rate 7 times faster than supermarket channel, the potential future benefits of having a position in the natural foods segment could be significant.  Besides, if the supermarket product fails due to over expenditure, inefficient employees, etc. the company can shift its focus to the natural foods retail products. Vice versa, if the natural foods segment faces hindrances such a increased demands from retailers, it can always shift its attention to the supermarket segment.  Option 2 is not preferred as there is not guarantee that the company would be able to expand nationally in a span of 12 months, and have sufficient marketing and sales expertise to advertise the products effectively in such a short interval. It is also expensive and the potential losses the company would incur if the segment fails could be large.