Dr. Sinn talks in detail about how climate policies might have paradoxical results. This presentation helps in understanding Dr. Sinn's concept in a much easy way.
2. 1. What is a Paradox?
2. What is Global Warming?
3. What are Green Policies?
4. What is Green Paradox
5. How to Fight Green Paradox?
2
The Green Paradox
Agenda
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Agenda
3. The Green Paradox
1. What is a „Paradox“?
3TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
What is a „Paradox“?
4. A paradox is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true premises, leads to an apparently-
self-contradictory or logically unacceptable conclusion
4
The Green Paradox
1. Definition
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : Wikipedia
What is a „Paradox“?
5. The Green Paradox
2. What is Global Warming?
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019 5
What is Global Warming?
6. Global warming is the unusually rapid increase in Earth’s average
surface temperature over the past century primarily due to the
greenhouse gases released by people burning fossil fuels
6
The Green Paradox
2.1 Definition
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : NASA
What is Global Warming?
7. • Green House Gases trap infra-red radiation emitted by the earth’s surface
• This causes an increase in the earth‘s surface temperature
• As a result
- Rising Sea Levels
- More Droughts & Heat Waves
- Strong Hurricanes
7
The Green Paradox
2.2 Why do we have to worry?
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
What is Global Warming?
8. Green House Gases(GHG)
- Water vapor (H2O)
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Methane (CH4)
- Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
- Ozone (O3)
- Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
- Hydrofluorocarbons (incl. HCFCs and HFCs)
8
The Green Paradox
2.3 What is causing Global Warming?
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : NASA
What is Global Warming?
9. • CO2 is the most commonly produced GHG by
human activities
• Responsible for 64% of man-made global
warming
• Once emitted, it stays in the atmosphere for
30,000 – 35,000 years
9
The Green Paradox
2.4 CO2
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : European Commission
What is Global Warming?
% of green house effect
Nitrous Oxide Ozone CFC Methane Carbon Dioxide
10. • Fossil Fuels majorly consist of Carbon-Hydrogen
bonds
• Energy is released when these bonds are broken
through oxidation
• CO2 is a by-product of this process
10
The Green Paradox
2.5 Fossil Fuels – Major Culprit
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : Datahub(Graph Data)
What is Global Warming?
300
320
340
360
380
400
420
1959 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015
CO2 Concentration (PPM)
11. The Green Paradox
3. What are Green Policies?
11TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
What are Green Policies?
12. Policies aimed at avoiding, reducing or mitigating the damage caused to environment by human activities
12
The Green Paradox
3.1Definition
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
What are Green Policies?
13. • Direct reduction of fossil fuel demand
• More efficient use of energy
• Green electricity
• Nuclear Energy
13
The Green Paradox
3.2 Ideologies behind Green Policies(concerned with fossil fuels)
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source :The Green Paradox
What are Green Policies?
14. The Green Paradox
4. What is a Green Paradox?
14TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
What is Green Paradox?
15. An environmental policy that becomes greener with the passage of time acts like an announced
expropriation for the owners of fossil fuel resources, inducing them to accelerate resource extraction and
hence to accelerate global warming.
15
The Green Paradox
4.1 Definition
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : Wikipedia
What is Green Paradox?
16. • When the supply of a certain product is elastic, a
shifting demand curve can impact the quantity
demanded
16
The Green Paradox
4.2 Supply of Carbon – Elastic or Inelastic
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : The Green Paradox
What is Green Paradox?
Fixed Supply Price
Fossil Carbon Stocks
WorldMarketPrice
Reduced Demand
Δc
17. • When the supply of a certain product is inelastic,
a shifting demand curve can not impact the
quantity demanded
• The only change that can be seen is a
increase/decrease in the price
17
The Green Paradox
4.3 Supply of Carbon – Elastic or Inelastic
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : The Green Paradox
What is Green Paradox?
Fixed Supply Quantity
Fossil Carbon Stocks
WorldMarketPrice
Reduced Demand
Δp
18. • Demand drop in Kyoto Countries due to Green
Policies
• This drop in demand creates a new equilibrium
for the Non-Kyoto Countries
• Results in a price drop for Non-Kyoto countries,
driving up the consumption
18
The Green Paradox
4.4 Carbon Leakage
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : The Green Paradox
What is Green Paradox?
WorldwideCarbon Supply
WorldMarketPrice
Reduced demand due to Green Policies
Δp
Kyoto Countries’ Demand
Non-Kyoto Countries’ Demand
Δc
19. • Mechanisms of yore, with less efficiency, left a lot of Carbon un-burnt in the form of soot
• With more efficient engines, every bit of Carbon is burnt and converted to CO2
19
The Green Paradox
4.5 Efficient, not Effective
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : The Green Paradox
What is Green Paradox?
20. • Fossil fuel extraction rates are calculated by
resource owners, so as to maximize current and
future profits
• Green policies that hint at appropriation drives the
resource owners to maximize the extraction now
20
The Green Paradox
4.6 Laws Hinting Appropriation
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : The Green Paradox
What is Green Paradox?
ProbabilityofAppropriation
ExtractionRate
Extraction Rate
Probability (Fear) of Appropriation
21. • India rolled out BS4 pollution norms in April‘17,
making it illegal to sell BS3 certified vehicles after
May‘17
• This resulted in a stark price drop of vehicles in
the month of April‘17
• Vehicle prices dropped around 50%, which drove
up the sales
21
The Green Paradox
4.7 Example from India – BS Norms
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : team-bhp(Graph Data)
What is Green Paradox?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Deo Dream CB Unicorn CB Hornet
Sales Figures – Honda
Mar-17 May-17
22. The Green Paradox
5. How to fight Green Paradox?
22TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
How to fight Green Paradox?
23. • A to B
- Increase in present consumption
- High man-made capital
- Global Warming
• A to C
- Constant present consumption
- High Natural Capital
23
The Green Paradox
5.1 Pareto Improvement
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : The Green Paradox
What is Green Paradox?
FutureConsumption
Present Consumption
A
C
B
24. • We have already observed, policies that focus on shifting the demand curve can only being about
change in price and not the consumption
• A solution to this
- Subsidy on the stock of carbon underground
- Tax on capital income earned from the extracted carbon
24
The Green Paradox
5.2 Supply Side Policies
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : The Green Paradox
How to fight Green Paradox?
25. • Green policies that only encompass few countries cause carbon leakage and are thus ineffective
• This can be avoided if all the countries accept a cap on consumption
• An extended Global Certificate Trading System can help achieve this
25
The Green Paradox
5.3 Super Kyoto
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : The Green Paradox
How to fight Green Paradox?
26. • Process involved in carbon capture and the long-term storage of atmospheric carbon dioxide or other
forms of carbon to mitigate or defer global warming
• Examples
- Reforestation
- Biochar Burial
- Ocean Storage
26
The Green Paradox
5.4 Carbon sequestration
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
Source : The Green Paradox
How to fight Green Paradox?
28. The Green Paradox
Thank You
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019 28
29. • Optimal Resource Taxation, HW Sinn (https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-06980-4_12)
• Carbon Leakage : An Overview by Andrei Marcu, Christian Egenhofer, Susanna Roth, Wijnand Stoef
(https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/Special%20Report%20No%2079%20Carbon%20Leakage_0.pdf)
• The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives?
(http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.163.910&rep=rep1&type=pdf)
• Analyzing the Kyoto Protocol under the Marrakesh Accords: economic efficiency and environmental effectiveness by Michel G.J den Elzen, André P.Gde
Moor
• Comparing the social costs of biofuels and fossil fuels: A case study of Vietnam by Loan T. Le, Ekko C. van Ierland, Xueqin Zhu, Justus Wesseler, Giang Ngo
• http://mudancasclimaticas.cptec.inpe.br/~rmclima/pdfs/destaques/sternreview_report_complete.pdf
• https://ec.europa.eu/clima/change/
• https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/motorbikes/188204-may-2017-two-wheeler-sales-figures-analysis.html
29
The Green Paradox
References
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Climate Change Economics | SS 2019
References
Editor's Notes
Good Morning every one.Now, we are going to discuss about "Green Paradox"
This is the agenda for today.
We are going to talk briefly about:
What is global warming?What is causing global warming?
Then we are going to have a look at Green Paradox and how to fight Green Paradox
The amount of CO2 produced by a fossil fuel is proportional to the amount of carbon present in the fuel. Hence, going forward, we are going to refer the "fossil fuel" as "Carbon"
Green policies spread over a wide range, however, as of today, we are going to discuss about the policies that are concerned with reducing the CO2 emissions
As you can see, the major ideologies behind green policies are:*read from slide*
Most of the "green policies" are designed based on the ideology that the supply of carbon is Elastic.
These policies target on shifting the demand curve to the left and assume that a new demand curve would reduce the consumption.
But in fact, the story is otherwise.
If we observe this illustration, it talks about a situation where the supply of carbon is inelastic, we can see that a shifting demand curve only reduces the price of the carbon. But in fact, while the consumption of carbon stays the same, the only change that can be perceived is a price drop.
As in any market, a price drop can only mean more consumption.
Imagine a church donation box.
Kyoto countries are the ones who are filling the donation box.
Lets say they put 10 Euros in the box.
If Non Kyoto countries don't put any donation, even then the net benefit is 10 Euros
But Non Kyoto countries are actually taking away the 10 Euros thus negating the benefit.
"Talk about the graph"
Soot is unburnt carbon. The old mechanisms were inefficient in converting the entire Carbon in the fuel to co2.
Modern mechanisms which have higher efficiencies, are not leaving any carbon molecule unburnt, which mean more CO2 is emitted per unit volume of the fuel when compared to older times.
Thus, though efficiency points towards "going green", it is not so effective overall.
With rising fear of appropriation and insecurity, the resources owners have high incentive in converting the underground carbon into capital by extracting it now, rather than saving it for future.
Hence, any law or policy with the slightest hint of appropriation actually increase the carbon extraction, thus increasing the consumption.
“Bharat Stage”(BS) norms aim at regulation of air pollutant output from internal combustion engines
Let us look at the efficiency frontier. Moving from point "A" to any point on the efficiency frontier is a Pareto Improvement.
Moving from point A to B implies increased consumption rate. That means, we leave little natural capital for the future generations but we create more man-made capital. But that also mean we are leaving a damaged planet.
Moving from A to C implies a constant consumption rate. We need to understand that we are not actually sacrificing anything when moving from A to C, yet we end up in a much higher efficiency point.
Thus, an efficient way to fight the green paradox is to "reduce carbon extraction"
Subsidy on the stock of carbon underground means everyone losing money and the resource owner getting rich. This might not be the best of solutions.
Another solution is to tax on the financial capital earned on the extracted carbon can prompt the resource owners to leave a larger part of their wealth underground
As we have already observed and understood, a green policy such as Kyoto Protocall in which only few countries take part, can cause carbon leakage.
However, a policy under which all the countries act together can actually work.
A very good example would be extending the carbon trading certificate system followed in EU countries to all the countries.
Thus, capping the carbon consumption.
Biochar is charcoal created by thermal decomposition of biomass waste in inert environment
CO2 is injected into the ocean where the high pressure makes sure CO2 is in liquid form
Biochar is charcoal created by thermal decomposition of biomass waste in inert environment
CO2 is injected into the ocean where the high pressure makes sure CO2 is in liquid form