3. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA [ECI]
ī Background
ī Legal framework
ī Organizational Structure/Capacity
ī Regulatory expansion
ī Electoral reforms
ī Changing role
ī Challenges
4. BACKGROUND
ī Elections:
ī Since ancient timesâĻ"Kudavolai" system of
imperial Cholas [They were basic grassâ root
democratic bodies]âĻ
ī British times alsoâĻbut no provision for
independent election commission
5. LEGAL FRAMEWORK
ī Art: 324 to 329 & others like Art .103
[whether a member of either House of
Parliament has become subject to any of
the disqualifications]
ī Representation of the People Act, 1950
ī Delimitation Commission [This is by parliament
and independent body from ECI] etc
ī Representation of the People Act, 1951
6. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE/CAPACITY
ī PermanentâĻindependent bodyâĻCentralised-to insulate from local
influence
ī Elections to Parliament, State legislatures, President & Vice-President
ī ECIâs writ not below state level bâcoz SECâĻ(Art. 243K and Art. 243ZA)
ī Sukumar Sen 1st âĻ
ī Election Commission acquired credibility during Mr Seshan's time
ī Up to 1993 single member body
ī CEC + 2 EC [Authority to President to appoint additional
commissioners]
ī CEC primus inter pares
ī CEC & other ECs â 65 years/6 years
ī Decision making on consensus
ī Regional commissioners by president after consulting ECI-not in use
now
ī Chief Electoral Officer â Statutory-RPA-1956, Appointed by ECI in
consultation with State Government
ī ECI Expenditure â Voted
ī No full time staff in the field
ī When elections are ongoing the ECI enjoys primacy over judiciary and
other branches of government
7. âĸ ECI
âĸ 36 CEO
âĸ 684 DEO-DM/DCâĻapart from that Election time
Observers-General & Financial
âĸ BLO
9. CHALLENGES OF PARTICIPATORY ELECTIONS
ī Diversities-geographicalâĻethnicâĻcaste
ī Poverty & Illiteracy
ī Inequality
ī Money & Muscle power
10. VOTERSâĻPOLITICAL
PARTIESâĻCANDIDATESâĻCONDUCTION OF
ELECTIONS
ī Nehru time better
ī 1967-Congress split- whom to recognizeâĻparties increasedâĻabuse of
power
ī Candidates increased
ī Electorate increased
ī Deepening of democracyâĻOBCs into electoral politics[a silent revolution by
C. Jaffrelot]âĻsub-optimal outcome
ī After emergency growth of money and muscle powerâĻCriminalization of
politics..Role of money
ī Ruling party tried to influence ECI like increasing ECsâĻhowever ruling part
not undermining ECIâs authority
ī 1990s Assertiveness of ECI
ī Structure:
ī Strong opposition in the States 1st. âĻthen in Centre
ī Mobilization of public and media
ī Agency
ī T.N. Seshan
11. VotersâĻPolitical PartiesâĻCandidatesâĻConduction of Elections
ECIâs decision to place the burden of registration on itself (voters
list) created practical challenges---urbanisationâĻ to verify
citizenship?
Registering political parties to the ECI- a copy of partyâs constitution
âĻ internal democracy of party also
Nomination of Candidates: Less deposit amount- non-serious
candidatesâĻamount increasedâĻdramatic fall in the candidates
[if no 1/6th of valid votes forfeit of deposit]âĻagain increased
SCâs backing ECI guidelines about candidates standing for election
to file affidavit about criminal, educational and financial
recordsâĻBarring serious criminal also in discussion
Conduct of elections: Model Code of Conduct- applicable to
candidates, parties and government-voluntary but ECI
implementing from time of announcement alsoâĻ constraints on
ruling government
Transfer of officials who are more years in a particular place
12. ECIâS INNOVATION TO HAVE FREE & FAIR
ELECTIONS
ī ECIâs organizational culture âĻEsprit de corps [a feeling of pride
and mutual loyalty shared by the members of a group]âĻ(N.
Gopalaswamy as CEC asked the President to remove EC Navin
Chawla)
ī EVMsâĻ1982âĻSC noâĻ2003âĻto stop electoral malpractice
ī Vulnerability mapping to identify booths prone to violence unrest
ī WebcamsâĻEPIC
ī Booth level officialsâĻcustodian of a booth, updated electoral rolls
ī Not more than 2km a polling station
ī The installation of the âNOTAâ (None of the Above) button in the
EVMs
ī Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs)/verifiable
paper record (VPR)
ī IIDEM- India International Institute of Democracy and Election
Management (IIIDEM)- https://eci.nic.in/eci_main1/iidm.aspx
13. MONEY POWER
ī It constraints meritorious candidate
ī Candidates expenditure larger than reported
to authorities
ī Black moneyâĻSanthanam & Wanchoo
committee reported
ī License-Quota-Permit Raj created nexus
between business groups and ruling parties
14. ī Political donations to be public by companies
ī Company and individual contribution to party
able to get tax exemption to certain limit
ī Political parties to submit audited accounts
ī NGOs ADR, National Election Watch
ī Media assistanceâĻpartial state funding
ī State fundingâĻ?
15. LINGERING ISSUES
ī CIC divided over bringing political parties under RTIRead more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/cic-divided-over-bringing-political-parties-under-
rti/articleshow/65479368.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
ī A political party will have to declare all donations it has received
above Rs 2,000 to the Income Tax Department to avail of tax
exemptions.
ī It is not bound to declare the names of donors for the same to the
EC in its contribution report, as the Representation of Peopleâs
Act still maintains the Rs 20,000 limit.
ī This means that the public cannot access the names of entities
who have donated more than Rs 2,000 to a political party,
defeating the objective of the move initiated in 2017. The EC is
also unable to do anything on the matter as rule books do not
allow it.
//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/66036321.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign
=cppst
16. MUSCLE POWER â CRIMINALIZATION OF
POLITICS
ī Congress time politicians employed criminals for voter suppression etc
ī 1970s Criminals directly to contest elections
ī Vohra committee reported
ī Criminal gangs-Police-Bureaucracy-Politicians
ī Why?
ī Breakdown & decay of Congress party dominance
ī Deterioration in law & order
ī Politicization of state/government
ī Political competitions including social divisions
ī Money â ability to transact liquid cash by criminals says [and also a statistics
says poorest category 1% chance of winning ]
ī However,
ī Lily Thomas vs. Union of IndiaâĻlegislators have lost their protection from immediate
disqualificationâĻconviction by the trial court will automatically result in removal from
the House
17. Challenges
Governance to improveâĻoutside the remit of ECI
Criticism
Breached its constitutional remit by political actors
Achievements of ECI
Higher turnoutâĻLess gender gap
However,
ECI requires more power through RPA amendment
Additional members to ECIâĻby PresidentâĻwill make
ECI weak?
Two ECs tenureâĻconflict between ECs & CEC
18. PROPOSED ELECTORAL REFORMS = LAW COMMISSION'S
RECOMMENDATION + THE GOSWAMI COMMITTEE REPORT IN 1990
AND OTHERS
ī Amendment to the Constitution of India
ī§ Constitutional protection for all members of the Commission
ī§ Budget of the Commission to be 'chargedâ
ī§ Independent Secretariat for the Commission
īElection Management Issues
ī§Use of common electoral rolls by election commission of India & States Election Commission
ī§To enhance the punishment for filing false affidavit
īDe- Criminalization of politics
ī§Bribery during elections (both cash and kind) a cognisable offence, enabling police to arrest the
violators without a warrant and to enhance the punishment up to two years.
īDE- REGISTRATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES [There is no constitutional or
īstatutory provision that gives power to the Election Commission to de-register political parties]
ī§Many political parties get registered, but never contest election. Such parties exist only on paper. The
possibility of forming political parties with an eye on availing the benefit of income tax exemption
also cannot be ruled out. It would only be logical that the Commission which has the power to
register political parties is also empowered to de-register in appropriate cases
ī§AN ON EXIT POLLS AND OPINION POLLS
ī§The Commission has been of the view that there should be some restriction or regulation on the
publishing / dissemination of the results of opinion polls also.
ī§For further reforms:
ī§https://www.eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/HandBooks/PROPOSED_ELECTORAL_REFORMS_0105201
7.pdf
19. ī Impact of Electronic Voting Machines on electoral frauds, democracy,
and development
ī Change in voting technology led to strengthening of the democracy by making
elections more competitive, which in turn had an impact on promoting
development by increased provision of electricity.
http://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/governance/impact-of-electronic-voting-machines-on-electoral-frauds-democracy-and-development.html
ī Do Indian voters mind their representatives getting rich in office?
Citizensâ low awarenessâĻvoters are largely unfamiliar with the content of the
disclosures
No evidence that a politicianâs wealth matteredâĻa politician's record in office
noticeably more heavily than information about wealth accumulation
About wealth accumulation, with some subgroups being relatively tolerant of
wealth accumulation in office, especially among politicians from their
preferred party or own caste group
In order for information to reach its full potential and have a real impact at the
polls, voters need to not only be aware but also understand the information.
High illiteracy rates and low citizen engagement in Indian political and civic
life are probably important challenges in this regard
Information dissemination initiatives are not a panacea to larger problems of the
Indian political system
http://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/governance/do-indian-voters-mind-their-representatives-getting-rich-in-office.html