Call Girl Service Bidadi - For 7001305949 Cheap & Best with original Photos
Β
Measurements and Calculations in Epidemiology
1. Unit 3: Measurements and
Calculations in Epidemiology
(10 Hours)
Draft Version 1.3
Upendra Raj Dhakal
Lecturer: Valley College of Technical Sciences
9849110689
urdhakal@gmail.com
2. Counts
β’ Counts are the total number of events that occurs in a defined period
of time.
β’ It is also known as frequencies.
β’ In epidemiology, only frequency have less meaning.
β’ Eg. Total number of Salmonellosis reported in Houston during 2000
would be an example of a count or frequency: - In 2000, 227 cases of
Salmonellosis were reported.
β’ In this example, 227 cases are the frequencies.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
3. Rate
β’ Rates are the basic tool of epidemiological practice.
β’ Ideally, the numerator and denominator must have different units in
rate. eg. Price of 1 piece of shirt = NRs. 1000/piece; kilometers per
liter.
β’ A rate is a measure of the frequency with which an event occurs in a
defined population in a defined time (e.g. Number of deaths per
hundred thousand Nepalese in one year).
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
4. Contd β¦
β’ In epidemiology, RATE is many times deviated from its ideal
definition. Many times rate, ratio and proportions are used
interchangeably which should not have happened.
β’ In Epidemiology, numerator contains the frequency of cases and
denominator is a risk population. All cases and risk population should
be within a same time and geographic frame. It can be expressed per
100, 1000 or even 1,00,000.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
5. Rate in epidemiology
Must contain:
β’ Health issue in numerator
β’ Unit size of population
β’ Turing period during which an event occurs
β’ Time is always a part of denominator
Rate =
ππ’ππππ ππ πππππ
π»ππππ π·πππππππππ π€ππ‘βππ π‘βπ πππ£ππ ππππ ππ
π‘βπ π πππππππ ππππππ ππ π‘πππ
π₯ 10 π
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
6. Types of Rate (CR, AR and SR)
β’ Crude Rate: Calculated without paying regard to specific sections of
the population.
CR =
π»ππππ ππ’ππππ ππ ππππππ π‘βππ‘ ππππ’πππ ππ π
πππ£ππ πππππππβππππ ππππ ππ’ππππ π πππ£ππ π¦πππ
π΄ππ β ππππ π·πππππππππ ππ π‘βπ πππππππβππππ
πππππ πππ π‘βπ π πππ ππππππ ππ π‘πππ
π₯ 1,000
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
7. Types of Rate (CR, AR and SR)
β’ Adjusted Rate: it is done to remove the effect of variable, such as age
or sex, to permit unbiased comparison in crude rate. Generally,
standard population distribution is used to adjust CR.
AR =
ππ’ππππ ππ ππππππππ ππ£πππ‘π
πππ‘ππ πΊππππ πππ ππππ’πππ‘πππ
π₯ 1,00,000
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
8. Types of Rate (CR, AR and SR)
β’ Specific Rate: It is calculated for the specific group of population such as
for a particular age, sex, marital status, occupation, etc..
SR =
ππ’ππππ ππ ππππππ ππππ’πππ πππππ π ππππππππ
πππππ ππ ππππ’πππ‘πππ ππ π πππ£ππ πππππππβππ
ππππ ππ’ππππ π πππ£ππ π¦πππ
π΄ππ β ππππ ππππππππππ ππ πππ ππππππππ πππππ ππ
π‘βπ ππππ’πππ‘πππ ππ π‘βπ π πππ πππππππβππ
ππππ ππ’ππππ π‘βπ π πππ ππππππ
π₯ 1,000
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
9. Ratio
β’ Ratio is a fractional relationship between two variables indicating how
many times the numerator contains to denominator.
β’ In ratio there is no specific relationship between numerator and
denominator like in rate, with same units.
β’ Unlike rate, it is not necessary Time to be a part of denominator.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
10. Contd β¦
β’ Since numerator and denominator have same units or even unitless,
ratio is dimensionless.
β’ Numerator is not a part of denominator in ratio.
β’ Eg. Among 100 population, 58 are female and 42 are male. When it is
expressed in terms of ratio, we can write it as F:M = 58:42 or 1.4:1
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
11. Difference MM Rate and MM Ratio
MM Rate =
π΅πππππ ππ ππππππππ π πππππ ππππ’ππππ ππ
πππππππππ ππππππ (π’π π’ππππ¦ 1 π¦πππ)
ππ’ππππ ππ πΎπΆπΉπ¨ ππ ππππ’πππ‘πππ
ππ πππππππππ ππππππ
π₯ π, πππ
MM Ratio =
π΅πππππ ππ ππππππππ π πππππ ππππ’ππππ ππ
πππππππππ ππππππ (π’π π’ππππ¦ 1 π¦πππ)
ππ’ππππ ππ ππππ ππππππ ππππ’ππππ
π€ππ‘βππ π‘βπ πππππππππ ππππππ
π₯ π, ππ, πππ
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
12. Proportion
β’ Proportion is nothing more than a ratio in which, numerator is always
a part of a denominator.
β’ When proportion is expressed in total number of population
(population at risk), it becomes rate.
β’ Eg. In a population of 100 women, 58 had premarital sex. The
proportion is 58/100 = 0.58 = 58%.
β’ Fetal Death Ratio, though is written ratio, it is a proportion.
Fetal Death Ratio =
π΅πππππ ππ πππ‘ππ ππππ‘βπ
π»ππππ ππππππ ππ πππ£π ππππ‘βπ
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
13. Incidence
β’ It is also known as Measure of Morbidity for new cases.
β’ It is the rate of the development of new cases of a disease that occur
during a specified period of time in previously disease free or
condition free individuals
β’ It is not influenced by the duration of the disease
β’ Many times, the denominator in formula uses mid β interval/year
population at risk, instead of Estimated number of people in
population (risk population)
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
14. Contd β¦
β’ Statistically,
πΌππππππππ π ππ‘π =
ππ’ππππ ππ πππ€ πππ ππ
ππ π π πππππππ ππππππ ππ π‘πππ
πΈπ π‘ππππ‘ππ ππππππ ππ π‘βπ ππππ’πππ‘πππ
ππ‘ π‘βπ π πππ ππππππ ππ π‘πππ
π₯ 100
β’ There are two fundamental approaches to measure incidence rate:
β’ Cumulative Incidence Rate, and
β’ Incidence Density Rate
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
15. Cumulative incidence rate (Incidence Proportion)
β’ Number of new cases of disease occurring over a specified period of
time in a population at risk at the beginning of the interval.
CIR=
ππ’ππππ ππ πππ€ πππ ππ ππ’ππππ π‘βπ ππππππππ ππππππ ππ π‘πππ
ππ’ππππ ππ ππππ’πππ‘πππ ππ‘ π‘βπ πππππππππ ππ π‘πππ
π₯ 1,000
β’ CIR is generally expressed in decimal per thousand per specific time.
β’ If it is measured for entire life, it is known as Lifetime risk.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
16. Incidence density rate (Person Time Incidence)
β’ Number of new cases of disease occurring over a specified period of time
in a population at risk throughout the interval.
β’ We need to add up period of time each individual was present in the
population, and was at risk of becoming a new case of disease.
β’ Denominator uses person β time at risk.
πΌπ· =
π΅πππππ ππ πππ πππππ ππ’ππππ π‘βπ
π πππππππ ππππππ ππ π‘πππ
πππ‘ππ ππππ ππ β π‘πππ ππ‘ πππ π ππ’ππππ π‘βπ πππ‘πππ£ππ
π₯ 1,000
β’ It is calculated in an open population (with migration), and every person
contributes different duration of βat riskβ interval
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
17. Relation between CI and ID
β’ The numerator does not differ between the two types of incidence.
β’ However, the denominator can differ in incidence density from
cumulative incidence because it takes account of:
β’ Cases who left during the defined year
β’ Cases who died
β’ Cases who had disease once and will not have it again in the same season
β’ Cases who entered in between in the defined year.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
18. Prevalence
β’ Prevalence is a measurement of all individuals affected by the disease at a
particular time. It is also known as Measure of Morbidity for new and old
cases.
β’ All current cases (New + old) existing in a given point in time or over a
period of time in a given population.
β’ It is of three types:
β’ Point prevalence
β’ Period prevalence, and
β’ Lifetime prevalence
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
19. Point - Prevalence
β’ Point prevalence is a measure of the proportion of people in a population who have
disease or condition at a particular time (generally a month or less or even a day)
β’ It is like a snapshot of the disease in time and is expressed in percentage.
β’ It is used to study chronic diseases
β’ It can be used to calculate specifically for age, gender, etc.
β’ When type of prevalence is not specified, we should consider it is point prevalence
ππ‘. π =
ππ’ππππ ππ ππ₯ππ π‘πππ πππ ππ π΅ππ + πΆππ ππ π
π ππππππππ πππ πππ π ππ π π πππππππ πππ‘π
π¬ππππππππ ππππππ ππ π‘βπ ππππ’πππ‘πππ
ππ‘ π‘βπ π πππ πππππ‘ ππ π‘πππ
π₯ 100
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
20. Period Prevalence
β’ It is the proportion of the population with a given disease or
condition over a specific period of time.
β’ Simply, it answers like: How many people in a population suffered
from common cold in 2018.
β’ It is expressed in percentage.
ππ. π =
ππ’ππππ ππ ππ₯ππ π‘πππ πππ ππ π΅ππ + πΆππ ππ π
π ππππππππ πππ πππ π ππ π π πππππππ π‘πππ πππ‘πππ£ππ
π¬ππππππππ ππππππ ππ π‘βπ ππππ’πππ‘πππ
ππ‘ π‘βπ π πππ ππππππ ππ π‘πππ
π₯ 100
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
21. Relationship between Prevalence and Incidence
β’ Prevalence = Incidence x Mean duration of illness
P = I X D
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
22. Lifetime Prevalence β Not in syllabus
β’ It is the proportion of individuals in population that at some point in
their life during the time of assessment, has experienced a case.
β’ The cases might have experienced a diseased condition, accident,
crime, harassment, β¦
β’ It is also known as cumulative prevalence
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
23. Risk
β’ Probability of developing an effect of certain risk factors.
Types of risk measurement
β’ Relative risk
β’ Odds Ratio (Case Control and Cross sectional/Prevalancestudies), and
β’ Risk ratio (Cohort/Incidence Studies)
β’ Attributable risk
β’ Comparative risk (Not in syllabus)
β’ Absolute risk (Not in syllabus)
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
24. Relative Risk
β’ It is the ratio of incidence in exposed persons to incidence in non
exposed person.
β’ It is the most commonly reported result in studies of risk, partially
because of conceptual convenience but also because of a common
metric in studies of similar risk factors but with different baseline
incident rates.
β’ Because it indicates the strength of association between exposure
and disease, it is useful measure of effect for studies of disease
etiology.
β’ Generally, Risk Ratio is calculated when Relative Risk is stated.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
25. Odds Ratio
β’ Odds = Chance or likelihood of something to happen or not to happen
β’ OR is a statistics that quantifies the strength of the association between two
events (disease and exposure). It is the ratio of two odds
β’ OR is the ratio of odds that disease will occur among individuals who have been
exposed to the risk factors to odds that the disease will occur among individuals
who has not been exposed to risk factors. (ratio between event and non event of
disease, and exposure)
β’ If the events are A (Lung Cancer) and B (Smoking), OR can be defined as a ratio of
the chance of A in the presence of B, and the chance of A in the absence of B.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
26. Contd β¦
β’ Interpretation:
OR > 1 : Strong association between disease and exposure to risk factors
OR = 1: No association between disease and exposure to risk factors
OR < 1 : Negative association between disease and exposure to the risk factors
β’ We cannot conclude our result (of any statistical calculation) only
depending on OR, and without knowing Confidence Interval (CI β range of
values we are fairly sure our true values lies in) and Significance value (p β
probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true).
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
28. Contd β¦
β’ Above formula can be understood from the table as:
β’ OR = (a/b)/(c/d) = ad/bc [ Statistically, we can write (a/c)/(b/d), but during
interpretation, it may be defined wrongly]
β’ Interpretation: The odds of having cancer is β¦. times higher (no chance or lower)
for smokers than the odd of having cancer to non smokers.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
Disease (lung cancer)
+ (Cases) - (Non Cases)
Exposure (Smoking)
+
Diseased and
exposed (a)
Healthy and
exposed (b)
-
Diseased and non β
exposed (c)
Healthy and non β
exposed (d)
29. Risk Ratio
β’ RR is the ratio of incidence of the outcome among exposed
individuals to the incidence among non exposed individuals.
β’ It compares the probability of an outcome among exposed to a risk
factor to the probability of that outcome among individuals who are
not exposed to the risk.
β’ Interpretation:
RR > 1 : Strong association between disease and exposure to the risk factor
RR = 1 : No association between disease and exposure to the risk factor
RR < 1 : Negative association between disease and exposure to the risk factor
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
30. Contd β¦
β’ Statistically,
π π =
πβπ πβππππ ππ πππππππππ π‘π βπππππ
πβπ πβππππ ππ πππ ππππππ ππ βπππππ
β’ Above formula can be understood from the table as:
β’ RR = (a/a+b)/(c/c+d) = a(c+d)/b(a+b)
β’ Interpretation: The risk of having cancer is β¦. times higher (no chance or lower) for
smokers than the risk of happening cancer to non smokers.
Disease (lung cancer)
+ -
Exposure (Smoking)
+
Diseased and
exposed (a)
Healthy and
exposed (b)
-
Diseased and non β
exposed (c)
Healthy and non β
exposed (d)
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
31. RRR, ARR and No. needed to treat (not in syllabus)
β’ RR = (a/a+b)/(c/c+d) = a(c+d)/b(a+b) (already done in previous slide)
β’ Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) = 1 β Relative Risk
β’ Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) =
π
π+π
β
π
π+π
β’ Number needed to treat = 1/ARR
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
32. Concluding OR and RR (just for reference, will understand later)
β’ OR and RR are interpreted in similar way, the only difference is the use of
word odds Ratio and Risk Ratio/Relative scale.
β’ Both OR, and RR gives the same information, but in different scale. Thus,
they are not equivalent, though the result interpreted are similar.
β’ OR and RR are used for rare diseases.
β’ If diseases are more common, like hypertension OR overestimates RR. i.e.
OR > RR. Thus, RR should be preferred in such case instead of OR
β’ RR is preferred when there is absolute incidence and prevalence. Incidence
is used in cohort study, whereas prevalence is used in cross β sectional
studies.
β’ If meaningful incidence or prevalence is absent, we use OR instead of RR
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
33. Concluding OR and RR (revision of definition)
β’ OR is the ratio of odds that disease will occur among individuals who
have been exposed to the risk factors to odds that the disease will
occur among individuals who has not been exposed to risk factors.
(ratio between event and non event of disease, and exposure)
β’ RR is the ratio of incidence of the outcome among exposed
individuals to the incidence among non exposed individuals.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
34. Attributable Risk
β’ Attribute = Quality of a characteristics
β’ It can be understood as excess risk or risk difference
β’ In Statistics, Attribute is a Qualitative type of characteristics calculated
using quantative measurements. It is done in cohort study design.
β’ It is just a difference of incidence of disease among exposed and
incidence of disease among unexposed. If expressed in percent, we
multiply the difference by 100 and so on.
AR = Incidence of disease among exposed β Incidence of disease among unexposed
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
35. Population Attributable Risk (not in syllabus)
β’ AR and PAR are different
β’ PAR is the amount of proportion of disease incidence that can be
attributed to a specific exposure
β’ It indicates to what extent the disease under study can be attributed to
the exposure.
β’ It is expressed in per 10 π
population when calculated in proportion
PAR =
πΌππππππππ ππ πππ πππ π πππππ ππ₯πππ ππ β πΌππππππππ ππ πππ πππ π πππππ πππ ππ₯πππ ππ
πΌππππππππ ππ πππ πππ π πππππ ππ₯πππ ππ
π₯ 10 π
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
36. Attack Rate
β’ For acute cases or during epidemic situation, Incidence rate is also
known as Attack rate
β’ Attack rate is used when the occurrence of disease among population
increases dramatically over a short period of time
β’ There are two types of attack rate:
β’ Primary attack rate, and
β’ Secondary attack rate
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
37. Primary Attack Rate
β’ Primary attack rate is based on the number of person who
contracted the disease directly from the source.
β’ Instead of primary attack rate, we are more focused in calculating
secondary attack rate
ππ΄π =
ππ.ππ πππππππ¦ πππ ππ ππ’ππππ π‘βπ π πππππππ ππππππ ππ π‘πππ
πππ‘ππ ππππ’πππ‘πππ ππ‘ πππ π
π₯ 100
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
38. Secondary attack
β’ It is defined as the probability that infection occurs among susceptible
persons within a reasonable incubation period following known
contact with an infectious person or an infectious source.
β’ Primary cases are excluded from both numerator and denominator.
Sπ΄π =
ππ.ππ ππππ‘πππ‘ ππππ ππ π€βπ πππ£ππππππ π‘βπ
πππ πππ π π€ππ‘βππ π‘βπ ππππ’πππ‘πππ ππππππ
ππ’ππππ ππ π π’π ππππ‘ππππ ππππ πππ π€βπ
ππππ‘ππππ‘ππ π€ππ‘β πππππππ¦ πππ ππ
π₯ 100
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
39. What do you understand?
Disease
(lung cancer)
+ -
Exposure(Smoking)
+
Diseased
and
exposed
(a)
Healthy
and
exposed
(b)
-
Diseased
and non β
exposed
(c)
Healthy
and non β
exposed
(d)
Compare
When test says you have and
actually you have it (a)
When the test says you donβt have it
but you actually have it (d)
When the test says you donβt have it
and you actually donβt have it (c)
When the test says you have it
but you actually donβt have it (b)
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
40. Validity and reliability testing
β’ Validity measures the accuracy i.e. measuring what was aimed to
measure. We can measure internal validity and external validity.
β’ Validity is tested using the formula:
β’ Accuracy testing [Accuracy = {(a + d)/(a + b + c + d)} x 100] (from 2 X 2 table)
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
41. Contd β¦
β’ Reliability measures the precision of test by considering confidence
interval (CI) for the measure of accuracy. It sees consistency of data.
β’ Reliability/Repeatability is tested using
β’ Positive predictable values
β’ Negative predictable values
β’ Eg. 1 Kg Mass is same regardless of altitude whereas 1 Newton weight
differs with altitude taking into account the use of beam balance or
spring balance.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
42. Sensitivity (Not in syllabus)
β’ It refers to the proportion of subjects with the disease condition giving
positive test result.
β’ It is also known as true positive rate/recall/probability of detection and
indicates the probability a person has a positive test result
β’ It generally measures the ability of a test to detect the disease condition.
Sensitivity =
ππ’ππππ ππ π‘ππ’π πππ ππ‘ππ£ππ
ππ. ππ π‘ππ’π πππ ππ‘ππ£π+ππ.ππ ππππ π πππππ‘ππ£π
π₯ 100
=
ππ’ππππ ππ π‘ππ’π πππ ππ‘ππ£ππ
πππ‘ππ ππ.ππ π πππ πππππ£πππ’πππ ππ ππππ’πππ‘πππ
= Probability of positive test given that the patient has a
disease
= {a/(a+c)}x 100 (from 2 X 2 table)
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
43. Specificity (Not is syllabus)
β’ It refers to the proportion of subjects without the disease condition giving
negative test result.
β’ It is also known as true negative and indicates the probability a person has
a negative test result
β’ It generally measures the ability of a test to detect the non disease
condition.
Specificity =
ππ’ππππ ππ π‘ππ’π πππππ‘ππ£ππ
ππ. ππ π‘ππ’π πππππ‘ππ£ππ +ππ.ππ ππππ π πππ ππ‘ππ£ππ
π₯ 100
=
ππ’ππππ ππ π‘ππ’π πππππ‘ππ£ππ
πππ‘ππ ππ.ππ π€πππ πππππ£πππ’πππ ππ ππππ’πππ‘πππ
= Probability of negative test given that the patient well
= {d/(b+d)} x 100 (from 2 X 2 table)
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
44. Interpretation (Not in syllabus)
β’ Sensitivity: The probability that a patient with the disease will have a
positive test result is β¦.
β’ Specificity: The probability that a patient without the disease will
have a negative test result is β¦.
β’ Accuracy/Validity: The probability that the results of a test will
accurately predict presence (or absence) of disease is β¦
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
45. Predictable value
β’ There are two versions of Predictable
value
β’ Positive Predictable value, and
β’ Negative Predictable value
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
46. Positive Predictable Value
β’ Positive predictable value (PPV) gives the proportion of positive result in
statistics and diagnosis tests that are true positive.
πππ =
ππ’ππππ ππ π‘ππ’π πππ ππ‘ππ£ππ (π)
ππ’ππππ ππ π‘ππ’π πππ ππ‘ππ£ππ π + ππ’ππππ ππ ππππ π πππ ππ‘ππ£ππ (π)
π₯ 100
β’ It can also be calculated from sensitivity, specificity and prevalence.
πππ =
π πππ ππ‘ππ£ππ‘π¦ π₯ ππππ£ππππππ
π πππ ππ‘ππ£ππ‘π¦ π₯ ππππ£ππππππ+ 1 βπ πππππππππ‘π¦ π₯ (1 βππππ£ππππππ)
β’ Also from 2 X 2 table as: PPV = {a(a + b)} x 100
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
47. Negative Predictable Value
β’ Negative predictable value (NPV) gives the proportion of negative result in
statistics and diagnosis tests that are true negative.
πππ =
ππ’ππππ ππ π‘ππ’π πππππ‘ππ£ππ (π)
ππ’ππππ ππ π‘ππ’π πππππ‘ππ£π π + ππ’ππππ ππ ππππ π πππππ‘ππ£π (π)
π₯ 100
β’ It can also be calculated from sensitivity, specificity and prevalence.
πππ =
π πππππππππ‘π¦ π₯ (1 β ππππ£ππππππ)
(1 β π πππ ππ‘ππ£ππ‘π¦) π₯ ππππ£ππππππ+ 1 βπ πππππππππ‘π¦ π₯ (1 βππππ£ππππππ)
β’ Also from 2 X 2 table as: NPV = {d(c + d)} x 100
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
48. Likelihood Ratio
β’ Sensitivity, Specificity and Predictable values are influenced by prevalence
of the disease.
β’ Instead, likelihood ratio are not influenced by the prevalence of the
disease.
β’ Thus, we prefer Likelihood ratio many times instead of sensitivity,
specificity and predictable values
β’ Likelihood ratio is the ratio of any two specified likelihoods
β’ The Likelihood Ratio (LR) is the likelihood that a given test result would be
expected in a patient with the target disorder compared to
the likelihood that that same result would be expected in a patient without
the target disorder.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
49. Contd β¦
β’ Like Predictable value, Likelihood Ratio are of two types
β’ Positive Likelihood Ratio
LR (+ve) =
ππππ ππ‘ππ£ππ‘π¦
1 β π πππππππππ‘π¦
= {a/(a+c)}/{b/(b+d)} ( 2 X 2 table)
and
β’ Negative Likelihood Ratio
LR(βπ£π) =
1 β ππππ ππ‘ππ£ππ‘π¦
π πππππππππ‘π¦
= {c/(a+c)}/{d/(b+d)} ( 2 X 2 table)
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
50. Interpretation of likelihood ratio
Scale
Qualitative Strength LR (+ ve) LR ( - ve)
Excellent >10 <0.1
Very Good 6 0.2
Fair 2 0.5
Useless 1 1
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
In real world
β’ The increase in the odds of having the disease after a positive test result is β¦..
β’ The decrease in the odds of having the disease after a negative test result is β¦.
51. Use of Incidence and Prevalence in disease control
β’ Prevalence measures the burden of disease in a population in specified time.
β’ Prevalence is used to compare disease burden across locations over time period.
β’ Prevalence helps to control endemic disease, and help in plans and policies.
β’ Incidence measures the number of new cases of disease among the number of
susceptable person in a given location in a specified time
β’ Incidence measures the load of disease etiology and pathogenesis.
β’ Incidence measures the rate variation among different subgroups or different
exposures.
β’ Incidence helps to take action to control disease, esp during epidemics and
emergency.
β’ Incidence helps in making plans for mobilizing RRT, β¦
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
52. Measurement of Burden of disease (DALY,
HALE, QALY)
β’ DALY: Disability Adjusted Life Year.
β’ HALE: Health Adjusted Life Expectancy.
β’ QALY: Quality Adjusted Life Year.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
53. Disability Adjusted Life Year (DALY)
β’ DALY is a measure of overall disease burden, expressed as the number
of years lost due to ill β health, disability or early death.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
54. Life Expectancy (LE)
β’ Life Expectancy (LE): Life expectancy at birth is the average
number of years that would be lived by babies born in a
given time period if mortality levels at each age remain
constant.
β’ Similarly, life expectancy at age 65 is the average number of
remaining years of life that a man or woman aged 65 will
have if mortality levels at each age over 65 remain constant.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
55. Health Adjusted Life Expectancy (HALE)
β’ Health Adjusted Life Expectancy (HALE)/Healthy Life Expectancy
(HLE) at birth is an estimate of the average number of years
babies born this year would live in a state of βgoodβ general
health if mortality levels at each age, and the level of good
health at each age, remain constant in the future. Similarly,
healthy life expectancy at age 65 is the average number of
remaining years a man or woman aged 65 will live in βgood
general healthβ if mortality levels and the level of good health at
each age beyond 65 remain constant in the future.
β’ It measures the quality of living
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
56. Contd β¦
β’ It can be calculated simply, as
HALE = Life Expectancy β Number of years living in unhealthy status
HALE = A - fB, where
β’ A = Years lived healthily
β’ B = Years lived with disability or illness
β’ A + B = Life Expectancy
β’ A β fB = Healthy life expectancy, where f is a weighing to reflect
disability/illness level.
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
57. Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE) in Graph
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
Male LE =
79.7 years
- 7.3 yrs in an
unhealthy state
HALE
72.4
HALE
Female LE = 84.2
years
-9.2 yrs in an
unhealthy state
HALE75
HALE
58. Contd β¦ (not needed)
β’ HALE at age x is the sum of YWDi from i = x to w (the last open β ended age
interval in the life table) divided by lx (survivors at age x):
π»π΄πΏπΈ π₯ = π΄ =
(Ο π=π₯
π€
πππ· π)
πΏπ₯
, where
β’ YWDx = Lx(1 β Dx) = Years of healthy life lived between ages i (x and x + 5)
β’ Ydx = Lx X Dx = Lost years of healthy life between ages i (x and x + 5)
β’ Lx = Total years lived by the life table population between age i (x and x + 5)
β’ Dx = Severly weighed prevalence of helth states or disability ages i (x and x + 5)
β’ Also,
HALE = LHEx -
(Ο π=π₯
π€
ππ· π)
πΏπ₯
, where
β’ LHEx = Healthy Years of Lost Life
β’ YDi = Years of healthy life lived between age i (x and x + 5)
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)
59. Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY)
β’ QALY is a generic measure of disease
burden including both the quality
and quantity of life lived.
β’ It is used in economic evaluation to
access the value of money of medical
interventions, like cost utility
analysis, cost effective analysis,
increment cost calculation, and for
allocating health care resources.
β’ Its measurement unit us QALY, and
graph is necessary to explain
Draft Version 1.3 (Feedback Welcomed)