Research Communication Today – A Paradigm Shift in Impact Business Models
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
2 likes•306 views
A quick glance at the changing impact business models of scholarly communication that I see from Stockholm University. Researchers are increasingly considering usage of scholarly output as important impact and a decreasing value in traditional citations. This is a bottom-up researcher-driven change that aims at result-oriented dialogue and collaboratino rather than being affiliated with a publisher and journal. What is the strategy of communication research at ABB Corporate Research in this perspective?
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Research Communication Today – A Paradigm Shift in Impact Business Models
Similar to Research Communication Today – A Paradigm Shift in Impact Business Models (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Research Communication Today – A Paradigm Shift in Impact Business Models
- 1. Research Communication Today A Paradigm Shift in Impact Business Models Thomas Neidenmark, PhD Head of Quality, Stockholm University
- 2. 31/08/2015 Thomas Neidenmark, Stockholm University Paradigm Shift in Impact Business Models Citations Recognition by publishers/editors All metrics Recognition by anyone Counted in any channel on the Internet Counted in exclusive databases Attribution to journals (JiF) Attribution to authors and the results
- 3. 31/08/2015 Thomas Neidenmark, Stockholm University Usage is important to researchers Money is important to publishers Value Proposition 1. Journal 2. Article 3. Author 1. Results presented in any manifestation are applicable 2. Author attribution
- 4. 31/08/2015 Thomas Neidenmark, Stockholm University Source: https://www.routledge.com/products/9781857434200
- 5. 31/08/2015 Thomas Neidenmark, Stockholm University Global Researcher- driven Change
- 6. 31/08/2015 Thomas Neidenmark, Stockholm University What is in it for ABB? ?
- 7. Most Cited Article in Scopus, filterered affiliation: ”ABB Corporate Research” and territory: ”Sweden” Source: http://goo.gl/L0rqme 31/08/2015 Thomas Neidenmark, Stockholm University
- 8. ”VSC-based HVDC power transmission systems: An overview” Source: http://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.url?eid=2-s2.0-67349216678&origin=recordpage#tabs=1 31/08/2015 Thomas Neidenmark, Stockholm University
- 9. Source: http://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.url?eid=2-s2.0-67349216678&origin=recordpage#tabs=2 31/08/2015 Thomas Neidenmark, Stockholm University
- 10. Stockholm University Research Tracking 31/08/2015 Thomas Neidenmark, Stockholm University
- 11. Source: http://info.swepub.kb.se/utsokningar-av-data/aktuell-statistik/ 31/08/2015 Thomas Neidenmark, Stockholm University All Swedish Publications per Subject
- 12. 31/08/2015 Thomas Neidenmark, Stockholm University ● Help researchers retain copyright ● Demand Open Access Publishing ● Follow the data (proposal by European Commission to the parliament to decide on TDM Spring 2016) ● Distinguish authors and results – ORCID http://www.orcid.org – DOI http://www.doi.org/ ● Open Archives Trends to Support the New Impact Business Models
Editor's Notes
- Left: a top down perspective where traditional actors in Scholarly Communication wants to preserve status quo. Swedish Research Council - demands that funded research is applicable and Open Access – but still only counts citations. Quality Controlled Data – however weak data – most channnels researchers use are excluded from databases WoS and Scopus Nervous status quo keepers – sit tight. Small adjustments Right: a bottom-up perspective where researchers want to see real-time re-use and ”talk” about their research. Citation were long the only mechanism to measure impact. Not anymore. Angry researchers refusing to work for the traditional publishers Researchers want prestige and recognition, but not to any cost. More and mor focus on research being applied on something that matters to someone. Not only traditional quality control, but making sure research is used for something.
- Preserving a system of circulating articles 2. Researcher need to understand what people are saying about us and that their research has value for something concrete. Therefor we cannot rely only on exclusive company-ruled information. Follow the talk! Spread the word.
- I do not know what ABB wants. ABB is funding research, collaborates with universities, and publishing research (most conference papers). What is ABB aiming at? What does ABB want with its research? I assume attract best researchers/coworkers, making the brand known? I know what researchers want: to be recognized and getting prestige for high quality research. With that in mind I must assume ABB wants that too for it’s researchers. I know Ericsson wants that, but also find out to what extent their projects really was well invested money. Are reports re-used or not within the company? Do ABB want others to talk about their research and top notch results? What is the strategy?
- Evaluating a BI solution for tracking usage – not plagiarism etc. There are many ways to study the life of research results. Not to feed our department heads with information. But to put the information to those who really should have it: the individual researcher. Researchers well informed decision making is what is important to scholarly communication. Where are your readers? If choosing between two conferences, perhaps you should pick the one where your audience is? Or where it is not? We will track Mentions, facebook twitter, downloads, views, use in presentations, As long as the publications are online – we can follow them.
- Green open access 3304 Golden OA 262
- Does not mean working against traditional publishers, but to speed up their focus on making research count in any way it is performed or published.