Reply to both posts using approx. 100-150 words for each, Please use a scholarly sources as reference. Reply to Thalia The process of engaged decision-making connected to activities performed in the event of challenging, uncertain, or hazardous conditions is termed as leadership. Management is the purposeful activity of directing individuals through a set of formulated policies and procedures that are scientifically approved to attain the set healthcare outcomes. For example, pain therapy needs an awareness of the fundamental etiology of pain and a collection of therapeutic alternatives that may be deployed to the circumstance at present and may vary from basic to complex activities (Bleich, 2016). By participating to issue detection, accomplishing tasks, and offering input for assessment, followers engage with individuals who are leading or managing. Several structured roles, like a nurse manager or a charge nurse, necessitate an enhanced collection of leadership and management skills to define institutional aims and goals, supervise human resources, facilitate staff with productivity responses, implement change, and solve conflicts in order to achieve client care and institutional specifications. Nursing, unlike other professions, requires nurses to alternate from managing, leading, and following on a regular basis. Reply to Selena Nursing is a well-rounded profession. In dealing with roles in nursing they are important for the flow of the flow and hierarchy. The three jobs of leadership, managing, and following all make up different roles. Leadership and management are often viewed as one and the same but that is not the case. Where they differ is leadership is looking forward and thinking of new ways to improve and management makes sure these new policies are being followed. Leadership focuses on “maximizing” effectiveness meaning increasing productivity of the floor (Marquis & Huston, 2017). Management handles in controlling the environment like; salaries, overtime, supplies, etc. (Marquis & Huston, 2017). Those that are followed are the ones carrying out the policies. For example, a leader creates the policy of after exiting a patient’s room to sanitize their hands to decrease the spread of disease. Management’s role is to ensure that this policy is being carried out by those working on the floor and explaining the purpose of the policy. Lastly, those that follow are the ones putting the policy in action and are applying it. They each play a role in creating a cohesive flow. There should always be an open line of communication between all parties so alterations can be made to improve effectiveness even more. In the case of a nurse moving through the positions, it is entirely possible. To better explain picture this; a nurse begins at the follower level (following the policy) and gets promoted to a management position this nurse has a better understanding of how the floor works and what alterations may be necessary to promote a bet ...

1. Reply to both posts using approx. 100-150 words for each,
Please use a scholarly sources as reference.
Reply to Thalia
The process of engaged decision-making connected to activities
performed in the event of challenging, uncertain, or hazardous
conditions is termed as leadership. Management is the
purposeful activity of directing individuals through a set of
formulated policies and procedures that are scientifically
approved to attain the set healthcare outcomes. For example,
pain therapy needs an awareness of the fundamental etiology of
pain and a collection of therapeutic alternatives that may be
deployed to the circumstance at present and may vary from
basic to complex activities (Bleich, 2016). By participating to
issue detection, accomplishing tasks, and offering input for
assessment, followers engage with individuals who are leading
or managing. Several structured roles, like a nurse manager or a
charge nurse, necessitate an enhanced collection of leadership
and management skills to define institutional aims and goals,
supervise human resources, facilitate staff with productivity
responses, implement change, and solve conflicts in order to
achieve client care and institutional specifications. Nursing,
unlike other professions, requires nurses to alternate from
managing, leading, and following on a regular basis.
Reply to Selena
Nursing is a well-rounded profession. In dealing with roles in
nursing they are important for the flow of the flow and
hierarchy. The three jobs of leadership, managi ng, and
following all make up different roles. Leadership and

2. management are often viewed as one and the same but that is
not the case. Where they differ is leadership is looking forward
and thinking of new ways to improve and management makes
sure these new policies are being followed. Leadership focuses
on “maximizing” effectiveness meaning increasing productivity
of the floor (Marquis & Huston, 2017). Management handles in
controlling the environment like; salaries, overtime, supplies,
etc. (Marquis & Huston, 2017). Those that are followed are the
ones carrying out the policies. For example, a leader creates the
policy of after exiting a patient’s room to sanitize their hands to
decrease the spread of disease. Management’s role is to ensure
that this policy is being carried out by those working on the
floor and explaining the purpose of the policy. Lastly, those that
follow are the ones putting the policy in action and are applying
it. They each play a role in creating a cohesive flow. There
should always be an open line of communication between all
parties so alterations can be made to improve effectiveness even
more. In the case of a nurse moving through the positions, it is
entirely possible. To better explain picture this; a nurse begins
at the follower level (following the policy) and gets promoted to
a management position this nurse has a better understanding of
how the floor works and what alterations may be necessary to
promote a better flow on the floor. If a nurse were to obtain a
leadership position, they would be able to be more creative in
new policies with an understanding of how a floor works,
nursing education, and the thought process when handling
patients so that it is both efficient but does not add too much to
the already present workload.
1/27/22, 6:52 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical
Applications in Cybe…y Management and Policy (2222) -
UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of

3. 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_ass
ess…5244&groupId=0&d2l_body_type =5&closeButton=1&sho
wRubricHeadings=0
Close
Print Rubric50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and
Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 485 6380 Prac!cal Applica!ons in Cybersecurity
Management and Policy (2222)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No
Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.

4. 3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
Use of Authorita!ve

5. Sources
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short

6. paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some

7. required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.

8. 17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate

9. examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis

10. lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
6.5 points
Men!oned the required
topic but the analysis
was very disorganized or
off topic. OR, the analysis
did not appropriately use
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources (too
many quota!ons or
improper paraphrasing).
0 points
Analysis was missing or
no work was submi"ed.

11. 10 points
Included an excellent
summary sec!on for the
short paper which was
on topic, well organized,
and covered at least 3
key points. The summary
contained at least one
full paragraph.
9 points
Included an outstanding
summary paragraph for
the short paper which
was on topic and covered
at least 3 key points.
8 points
Included a summary
paragraph for the short

12. paper which was on topic
and provided an
appropriate closing.
5 points
Included a summary
paragraph but, this
sec!on lacked content or
was disorganized.
1 point
Included a few summary
sentences for the short
paper.
0 points
Did not include a
summary for the short
paper.
5 points
Included and properly

13. cited three or more
authorita!ve sources
with complete
publica!on or retrieval
informa!on. No
forma$ng errors.
4 points
Included and properly
cited three or more
authorita!ve sources
(minor errors allowable).
Reference list entries
contain sufficient
informa!on to enable the
reader to find and
retrieve the cited
sources.
3 points

14. Included and cited two or
more authorita!ve
sources (minor errors in
cita!ons or reference
entries). Reference list
entries contain sufficient
informa!on to enable the
reader to find and
retrieve the cited
sources.
2 points
Included and cited at
least one authorita!ve
source (minor errors in
cita!ons or reference
entries). Reference list
entries contain sufficient
informa!on to enable the

15. reader to find and
retrieve the cited
sources.
1 point
Men!oned at least one
authorita!ve source but,
the cita!ons and/or
reference list entries
lacked required
informa!on (not
sufficient to retrieve the
correct resource).
0 points
References and cita!ons
were missing. Or, no
work submi"ed.
1/27/22, 6:52 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical

16. Applications in Cybe…y Management and Policy (2222) -
UMGC Learning Management System
Page 2 of
3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_ass
ess…5244&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&sho
wRubricHeadings=0
Professionalism
5 points
No forma$ng, grammar,
spelling, or punctua!on
errors. Submi"ed work
shows outstanding
organiza!on and the use
of color, fonts, !tles,
headings and sub-
headings, etc. is
appropriate to the
assignment type.
4 points
Work contains minor
errors in forma$ng,

17. grammar, spelling or
punctua!on which do
not significantly impact
professional appearance.
Work needs some
polishing to improve
professional appearance.
3 points
Errors in forma$ng,
spelling, grammar, or
punctua!on which need
a"en!on / edi!ng to
improve professional
appearance of the work.
2 points
Submi"ed work has
numerous errors in
forma$ng, spelling,

18. grammar, or punctua!on.
Substan!al polishing /
edi!ng is required.
1 point
Submi"ed work is
difficult to read and/or
understand. OR, work
has significant errors in
forma$ng, spelling,
grammar, punctua!on, or
word usage which
detract from the overall
professional appearance
of the work.
0 points
No submission.
First Cri!que Excellent Acceptable Needs Significant
Improvement Missing or No Work Submi!ed

19. Analysis
Professionalism
10 points
The cri!que pos!ng provided
three or more sugges!ons for
improvement in content which
were based upon an analysis of
the short paper (how well it met
the content requirements).
Provided examples which could
be incorporated into the short
paper to improve or refine it.
Authorita!ve sources were cited
as appropriate. The pos!ng
addressed the peer author by
name.
8.5 points
The cri!que pos!ng provided at

20. least three sugges!ons for
improvement in content which
were based upon an analysis of
the short paper (how well it met
the content requirements).
Authorita!ve sources were cited
as appropriate. The pos!ng
addressed the peer author by
name.
6 points
The pos!ng did not provide a
cri!que of the short paper. The
pos!ng may have included
compliments or "good job" type
comments.
0 points
The analysis was missing (or not
submi"ed before 11:59 PM ET

21. Tuesday night). OR the submi"ed
cri!que was copied (not the
student's own original work).
5 points
The cri!que was wri"en in an
appropriate tone of voice for a
peer-to-peer communica!on. No
forma$ng, grammar, spelling, or
punctua!on errors. Authorita!ve
sources were appropriately cited.
Submi"ed work shows
outstanding organiza!on and the
use of color, fonts, !tles, headings
and sub-headings, etc. is
appropriate to the assignment
type.
4 points
The cri!que was wri"en in an

22. appropriate tone of voice for a
peer-to-peer communica!on.
Authorita!ve sources were
appropriately cited. Work
contains minor errors in
forma$ng, grammar, spelling or
punctua!on which do not
significantly impact professional
appearance. Work needs some
polishing to improve professional
appearance.
3 points
The tone of voice used in the
cri!que was not appropriate for a
peer-to-peer communica!on in
the workplace. OR, there were
errors in forma$ng, spelling,
grammar, or punctua!on which

23. need a"en!on / edi!ng to
improve professional appearance
of the work.
0 points
No submission (or not submi"ed
before 11:59 PM ET Tuesday
night). Or, the cri!que was
copied (not the student's own
original work).
Second Cri!que Excellent Acceptable Needs Significant
Improvement Missing or No Work Submi!ed
Analysis
Professionalism
10 points
The cri!que pos!ng provided
three or more sugges!ons for
improvement in content which
were based upon an analysis of
the short paper (how well it met

24. the content requirements).
Provided examples which could
be incorporated into the short
paper to improve or refine it.
Authorita!ve sources were cited
as appropriate. The pos!ng
addressed the peer author by
name.
8.5 points
The cri!que pos!ng provided at
least three sugges!ons for
improvement in content which
were based upon an analysis of
the short paper (how well it met
the content requirements).
Authorita!ve sources were cited
as appropriate. The pos!ng
addressed the peer author by

25. name.
6 points
The pos!ng did not provide a
cri!que of the short paper. The
pos!ng may have included
compliments or "good job" type
comments.
0 points
The analysis was missing (or not
submi"ed before 11:59 PM ET
Tuesday night). OR the submi"ed
cri!que was copied (not the
student's own original work).
5 points 4 points 3 points 0 points
1/27/22, 6:52 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical
Applications in Cybe…y Management and Policy (2222) -
UMGC Learning Management System
Page 3 of

26. 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_ass
ess…5244&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&sho
wRubricHeadings=0
Total
Overall Score
The cri!que was wri"en in an
appropriate tone of voice for a
peer-to-peer communica!on. No
forma$ng, grammar, spelling, or
punctua!on errors. Authorita!ve
sources were appropriately cited.
Submi"ed work shows
outstanding organiza!on and the
use of color, fonts, !tles, headings
and sub-headings, etc. is
appropriate to the assignment
type.
The cri!que was wri"en in an
appropriate tone of voice for a

27. peer-to-peer communica!on.
Authorita!ve sources were
appropriately cited. Work
contains minor errors in
forma$ng, grammar, spelling or
punctua!on which do not
significantly impact professional
appearance. Work needs some
polishing to improve professional
appearance.
The tone of voice used in the
cri!que was not appropriate for a
peer-to-peer communica!on in
the workplace. OR, there were
errors in forma$ng, spelling,
grammar, or punctua!on which
need a"en!on / edi!ng to
improve professional appearance

28. of the work.
No submission (or not submi"ed
before 11:59 PM ET Tuesday
night). Or, the cri!que was
copied (not the student's own
original work).
Contribu!ons to Discussion Excellent Acceptable Needs
Improvement Missing or No Work Submi!ed
Follow-up Reply or
Comment #1
Follow-up Reply or
Comment #2
10 points
Posted a follow-up reply or
comment which demonstrated
cri!cal thinking and added value
to the discussion.
8.5 points
Posted an acceptable follow-up

29. reply or comment which added
some value to the discussion.
6 points
Posted a follow-up reply or
comment but added li"le value to
the discussion.
0 points
Pos!ng was missing (or not
submi"ed before 11:59 PM ET
Tuesday night). Or the pos!ng did
not add value to the discussion.
10 points
Posted a follow-up reply or
comment which demonstrated
cri!cal thinking and added value
to the discussion.
8.5 points
Posted an acceptable follow-up

30. reply or comment which added
some value to the discussion.
6 points
Posted a follow-up reply or
comment but added li"le value to
the discussion.
0 points
Pos!ng was missing (or not
submi"ed before 11:59 PM ET
Tuesday night). Or the pos!ng did
not add value to the discussion.
Do Not Use This Box
0 points minimum
WEEK3 Discussion
As part of its due diligence efforts, the M&A team has
determined that the following events contributed substantially
to the bankruptcy of Island Banking services.
1. Company officers and managers were able to conduct
criminal activities using company IT assets without detection.
2. The company did not have a disaster recovery / business
continuity plan in place. It could not restart operations due to
the loss of servers and workstations (seized by law enforcement

31. agents).
3. Storage media for servers and workstations had not been
backed up to an off premises location leaving the company with
no way to recover from the law enforcement seizure of storage
media as evidence.
The root cause for each event listed above was determined to
be: ineffective and/or missing IT security controls.
You have been asked to perform a gap analysis to assist in the
identification and selection of IT security controls which could
be implemented to remediate the situation ("close the gaps").
The CCISO has requested that you use the NIST Cybersecurity
Framework and the NIST Security and Privacy Controls Catalog
(NIST SP 800-53) as your source for IT security controls.
Choose 3 to 5 families or categories of controls ("framework
functions") which should be implemented to remediate the
above deficiencies (at least one family, e.g. AU Audit and
Accountability, or category, e.g. Recovery Planning, for each
event). Describe how the selected controls will prevent or deter
such events in the future ("close the gaps").
Format your response as a business memorandum. For each
control family or category, you should provide the following
information (see Domain 2 Section 1.1.2 in CCISO):
· What it is
· What it does
· How the control performs its objective
You should have at least 5 strong paragraphs in your memo.
Include citations and references (3 or more) to support your
written work.