Question 2: The following information, extracted from a survey of a Microfinance institution (MFI) represents the amount of loan request of 50 potential borrowers from any particular branch of that MFI. For the given data construct a suitable frequency distribution table featuring the following components i. Class mid value ii. Tally Bars iii. Frequency iv. Relative Frequency v. Cumulative frequency \& vi. Cumulativerelative frequency Using the aforementioned information also answer the following a. Determine the number of loan request between tk 4000- 6000 b. Determine the proportion of loan request between 4000 6000 . c. Determine the number of loan request below tk. 7000 . d. Determine the proportion of loan request below tk. 7000 ..

1. Question: Does Orbur's invention meet the utility requirement? 11. Inventor patents a new type
of satellite. When Inventor sues Competitor for building an identical satellite, Competitor argues
the patent is invalid for obviousness. The claimed invention is a combination of elements that
already appear in various references in the relevant prior art. Nothing in the prior art suggests
combining the references. But there is a very high level of skill in the relevant art of satellite
engineering. Competitor argues that such a high skill level means that one skilled in the art
would find any combination of references to be obvious. Question: Should the court accept that
argument? 12. Nick and Tony, plumbing engineers, have both signed agreements assigning
patent rights in their work to their employer, Super Plumbing. Nick spends considerable effort
trying to develop a soaperator. Although Nick makes great progress, he does not quite develop
the desired invention. Tony, however, continues the quest, relying in part on Nick's work. Tony
finally develops a soaperator, "A Device for Aerating Water and Providing Soap for Hand
Washing." Question: In deciding whether Tony's invention was non-obvious, does Nick's work
count as prior art?