SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Business School & Economics
Professional & Management Development Centre
MSc in STRATEGIC AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP
MANAGEMENT`
PROJECT
©DEALERSHIP GROWTH
PRE SALES MAXIMIZE PROFITABILITY
(Field Experiment)
by
STYLIANOS LAPATHIOTIS
Student ID: A912902
June 2012
n the competitive environment of the later 20th century, innovations in competitive
strategy have life cycles of 10 to 15 years. Each innovation is followed by major changes
in competitive positions and in corporate fortunes as these changes occur, concerned
managements struggle to understand the nature of their competitor’s advantage, such as the
live example of Toyota Hellas and VW Greece, in the last fifteen years.
However like in the military secret, the new source of advantage becomes understood by all
and is no longer an exploitable innovation.
Therefore a new innovation must be found!
Today’s innovation, within the Greek 2010 crisis crunch, is time and quality based
competition. Demanding executives at aggressive dealerships are altering their measures of
performance from competitive costs and quality, to competitive costs, quality and
responsiveness.
Give customers what they want, when they want it. Just – in – time.
"I was first introduced to the concepts of just-in-time (JIT) and the Toyota Production System
in 1980. Subsequently I had the opportunity to witness its actual application on one of our
numerous Japanese study missions. There I met Mr Taiichi Ohno, the system's creator. When
bombarded with questions from our group on what inspired his thinking, he just laughed and
said he learned it all from Henry Ford's book.
I discovered that many of the ideas we call ''just-in-time'' came from the way Henry Ford
organized his production process. In 1926 it took his workers only 81 hours to go from iron
ore to finish an automobile…
…He believed strongly in allowing the workers to benefit from what they were actually
producing. He reduced the price of a car in half and doubled worker wages from $2.50 to
$5.00 daily". [3] (N. Bodek,2003).
Time based competitors are offering greater varieties of products and services at lower costs
and in less time.
The main aim of this project is to attempt to estimate the population density and distribution
of the Productivity knowledge of Ford dealer management and personnel in the Hellenic
Automobile Market.
To determine their ability and capability to record, measure, and analyze their actual
effectiveness level in each Ford dealership by implementing new "tools" or using the existing,
for forecasting and achieving the ultimate for the dealership goal – profit.
To achieve this, the primary goal of this project is to define and establish within the Ford
dealer management and personnel, the attitude that the dealership is a "production line" and
its two (2) kind of products are Sales Labour Hours in the showroom, and After Sales
Labour Hours in the Service Parts, and B/P departments.
The objective is therefore, to change the mentality and the way of thinking of all Ford dealer
management and personnel, in the proper use of existing dealership IT ‘tools’ given by Ford
of Europe (LMS) or own, in order to achieve measurable presales of Sales Labour Hours
which will generate new and used vehicles sales, and Workshop Labour Hours, which in turn
will generate sales of spare parts and material during a given period of time.
Cost reduction and productivity improvement are attained through the elimination of various
‘wastes’ such as excessive inventory, excessive workforce and excessive lost and idle times.
I
The main purpose of the project is to eliminate through improvement activities, after
recording, measuring, analyzing, and correcting various kinds of ‘waste’ lying concealed
within a dealership operation.
Even during periods of slow or even zero growth, the dealership can make profit by
decreasing costs through a ‘production system’ that eliminates excessive inventory,
workforce, and non productive times.
It would probably not be said that this is another revolutionary production management
system, of new and used car sales, and service labor hours sales.
It follows the Henry Ford ‘continuous improvement’ System and Toyota’s Production
System (TPS).
It is based on the fundamentals of scientific analysis in which the Manager analyzes the input
DMS data by the front line personnel to understand how walk in customers in the showroom
and the service shop, want-need-act, so that they can learn how to influence them and service
them better. The small gradual changes of continuous improvement, applied over a period,
result on the ability in forecasting sales and after sales achievements, adding up on major
impacts on dealership financial results.
 Within March 1999 – January 2003, started and completed the ‘HR Management for
maximum competitive benefit in the After Sales’ field experiment project, with the
participation of five (5) Toyota Hellas Dealer service shops.
 The Service shop manager by recording, measuring and improving workforce
efficiency and utilization, can calculate and predefine productivity and therefore can
estimate departmental revenue and profitability. Hence being able to determine from
the beginning of a given period of time, the labor hours pre-sold.
This project in the workshop proves that ‘tomorrow can be predicted, estimated and
achieved’, within the human capabilities.
 The Ford Motor Hellas ‘Dealership Growth, Presales maximize Profitability’
project, commenced in September 2009 with the participation of three (3) pilot
Showrooms and seven (7) sales persons. From January – December 2011 the project
extended to six (6) showrooms and nineteen (19) sales persons, representing the 53%
of FMH Total Sales and 22% of the FMH Sales force in 2011.
Its purpose is to maximize sales efficiency of the existing showroom traffic in order to
achieve personal or showroom set sales objectives.
The Program ‘Maximizing Sales Person’s Effectiveness’
The program’s aim is to secure from the beginning of the time period that the individual or
department sales objectives (registrations) will be accomplished.
The application is based on the recovery of the recorded average showroom visits of the
showroom during past months.
The sales person is knowing from the beginning of the period the individual or departmental
sales objectives.
How to start?
Apply simple thinking, and start from the end!
The actual results of the showrooms and the sales persons objectives achievement, for the Full
Year 2011 indicate also that ‘Tomorrow can be Managed in the Dealership’, achieving
presales for the Business Financial Benefit even into a deep economic recession and the
Hellenic crisis crunch been in full extend since 2008 and still continues…
MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011
Dealer A (Argyroupoli Branch)
YEAR 2011 SALESMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SALESMAN D SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL
MONTH OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL
WALK-
IN
JANUARY 8 10 8 9 8 7 8 8 32 34 106
FEBRUARY 10 10 10 12 10 11 10 11 40 44 135
MARCH 11 12 11 12 11 13 11 13 44 50 135
APRIL 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 40 41 116
AUGUST 7 8 7 7 7 7 7 10 28 32 108
JUNE 7 10 7 10 7 6 7 7 28 33 107
JULY 7 7 7 6 7 10 7 10 28 33 99
AUGUST 6 5 6 6 6 3 6 5 24 19 87
SEPTEMBER 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 40 40 124
OCTOBER 10 11 10 12 10 12 10 10 40 46 126
NOVEMBER 10 13 10 11 10 12 10 11 40 47 135
DECEMBER 11 16 11 15 11 18 11 17 44 66 112
TOTAL 107 123 107 120 107 119 107 122 428 485 1390
SHOWROOM ACTUAL ACHIEVEMENT: 113%
MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011
Dealer B (Mesogeion Branch)
YEAR 2011 SALEMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL
Month OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL
WALK-
IN
JANUARY 4 4 5 7 5 7 14 16 70
FEBRUARY 6 5 6 3 6 6 18 14 147
MARCH 8 8 5 11 6 4 19 25 149
APRIL 5 5 5 11 5 5 15 21 125
AUGUST 4 4 5 5 6 7 15 15 85
JUNE 4 5 5 8 5 6 14 18 100
JULY 5 5 4 6 5 5 14 16 70
AUGUST 4 5 4 3 4 6 12 12 61
SEPTEMBER 4 4 2 6 4 2 10 14 85
OCTOBER 2 2 9 2 5 5 16 9 71
NOVEMBER 4 3 4 8 4 4 12 15 76
DECEMBER 5 5 3 3 4 4 12 12 66
TOTAL 55 55 57 73 59 61 171 187 1105
SHOWROOMACHIEVEMENT: 109,4%
MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011
Dealer A (Rossignol Branch)
YEAR 2011 SALEMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL
Month OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL WALK-IN
JANUARY 9 11 9 9 9 9 27 29 92
FEBRUARY 9 9 9 11 9 8 27 29 86
MARCH 9 11 9 15 9 11 27 35 129
APRIL 10 12 10 11 10 10 30 33 119
AUGUST 9 13 9 10 9 9 27 32 104
JUNE 10 10 10 12 10 10 30 32 95
JULY 11 9 11 8 11 12 33 28 90
AUGUST 10 5 10 8 10 8 30 23 71
SEPTEMBER 10 12 10 9 10 11 30 31 114
OCTOBER 10 12 10 13 10 10 30 35 91
NOVEMBER 11 13 11 11 11 12 33 35 117
DECEMBER 8 10 8 9 8 7 24 27 82
TOTAL 116 127 116 126 116 117 348 370 1190
SHOWROOMACHIEVEMENT: 106.3%
MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011
Dealer A (Patra Branch)
YEAR 2011 SALEMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL
Month OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL WALK-IN
JANUARY 3 1 3 2 3 1 9 4 39
FEBRUARY 5 5 5 5 5 7 15 17 49
MARCH 6 7 6 7 6 8 18 22 55
APRIL 5 5 5 5 5 5 15 15 38
AUGUST 4 5 4 4 4 4 12 13 41
JUNE 3 2 3 1 3 3 9 6 37
JULY 4 4 4 5 4 4 12 14 46
AUGUST 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 23
SEPTEMBER 4 5 4 4 4 4 12 13 32
OCTOBER 4 5 4 5 4 4 12 14 35
NOVEMBER 7 7 7 7 7 7 21 21 38
DECEMBER 7 6 7 7 7 7 21 20 31
TOTAL 55 55 55 55 55 57 165 168 464
SHOWROOMACHIEVEMENT: 101,8%
MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011
Dealer A (Pireos Branch)
YEAR 2011 SALEMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL
Month OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL WALK-IN
JANUARY 7 9 7 7 7 8 21 24 88
FEBRUARY 7 7 7 7 7 7 21 21 79
MARCH 7 10 7 8 7 8 21 26 82
APRIL 6 7 6 7 6 8 18 22 75
MAY 7 6 7 8 7 6 21 20 74
JUNE 7 7 7 7 7 8 21 22 71
JULY 6 5 6 7 6 7 18 19 65
AUGUST 7 7 7 6 7 7 21 20 71
SEPTEMBER 7 8 7 6 7 7 21 21 80
OCTOBER 7 7 7 8 7 7 21 22 86
NOVEMBER 9 10 9 10 9 11 27 31 81
DECEMBER 6 6 6 5 6 4 18 15 59
TOTAL 83 89 83 86 83 88 249 263 911
SHOWROOMACHIEVEMENT: 105,6%
MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011
Dealer B (Glyka Nera Branch)
YEAR SALEMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL
Month OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL WALK-IN
JANUARY 7 7 3 1 7 9 17 17 79
FEBRUARY 7 7 5 7 7 7 19 21 82
MARCH 7 8 6 8 7 10 20 26 88
APRIL 6 7 5 5 6 7 17 19 75
AUGUST 7 8 4 4 7 6 18 18 74
JUNE 7 7 3 3 7 7 17 17 71
JULY 6 7 4 4 6 5 16 16 86
AUGUST 7 6 3 3 7 7 17 16 71
SEPTEMBER 7 6 4 4 7 8 18 18 78
OCTOBER 7 8 4 4 7 7 18 19 67
NOVEMBER 9 10 7 7 9 10 25 27 81
DECEMBER 6 5 7 7 6 6 19 18 64
TOTAL 83 86 55 57 83 89 221 232 916
SHOWROOM ACHIEVEMENT: 105,0%
CONCLUSIONS
The reported annual actual sales achievement reached from 101% to113% of the total sales
objectives.
As it is seen, sales persons do not achieve every month the set objective, but the
showroom achieves its objective every month.
The reason is, as mention all participants of the involved to the project showrooms, that
according to the continuous improvement procedures they set in their daily operation and
function, with reporting and investigating continuously records in order to make minor
changes, their personal and showroom results have improved considerably.
They can now operate even within the economic crisis with less stress and the pressure assists
them to perform more efficiently and productively.
The information and data collected, have to do with enriching the dealership area of influence
customer profile (CRM).
Special attention is given by starting measuring Customer Abandonment index.

More Related Content

Similar to Business School

Magui Mohamed Gadallah cv up
Magui Mohamed Gadallah cv upMagui Mohamed Gadallah cv up
Magui Mohamed Gadallah cv up
Magui Gadallah
 
Pushing Past the Status Quo: in Your Wholesale & Retail Operations How Effici...
Pushing Past the Status Quo: in Your Wholesale & Retail Operations How Effici...Pushing Past the Status Quo: in Your Wholesale & Retail Operations How Effici...
Pushing Past the Status Quo: in Your Wholesale & Retail Operations How Effici...
karinabradley
 
SLP1 Example Excellent Ford, Inc.NOTE This is an example of id.docx
SLP1 Example Excellent Ford, Inc.NOTE This is an example of id.docxSLP1 Example Excellent Ford, Inc.NOTE This is an example of id.docx
SLP1 Example Excellent Ford, Inc.NOTE This is an example of id.docx
budabrooks46239
 
Curriculum vitae riaan greyling 29 nov 2015
Curriculum vitae riaan greyling   29 nov 2015Curriculum vitae riaan greyling   29 nov 2015
Curriculum vitae riaan greyling 29 nov 2015
Riaan Greyling
 
Ahmed Allam RESUME 2014
Ahmed Allam RESUME 2014Ahmed Allam RESUME 2014
Ahmed Allam RESUME 2014
Ahmed Allam
 
Mid term exam1
Mid term exam1Mid term exam1
Mid term exam1
Bakryk
 

Similar to Business School (20)

carwow insights workshop 2018
carwow insights workshop 2018carwow insights workshop 2018
carwow insights workshop 2018
 
HITESH REUME
HITESH REUMEHITESH REUME
HITESH REUME
 
mobile mechanic business plan
mobile mechanic business planmobile mechanic business plan
mobile mechanic business plan
 
GM sales Team Leader 08042014
GM sales Team Leader 08042014GM sales Team Leader 08042014
GM sales Team Leader 08042014
 
Mandeep
MandeepMandeep
Mandeep
 
10 Steps To Business Optimisation
10 Steps To Business Optimisation10 Steps To Business Optimisation
10 Steps To Business Optimisation
 
Magui Mohamed Gadallah cv up
Magui Mohamed Gadallah cv upMagui Mohamed Gadallah cv up
Magui Mohamed Gadallah cv up
 
Pushing Past the Status Quo: in Your Wholesale & Retail Operations How Effici...
Pushing Past the Status Quo: in Your Wholesale & Retail Operations How Effici...Pushing Past the Status Quo: in Your Wholesale & Retail Operations How Effici...
Pushing Past the Status Quo: in Your Wholesale & Retail Operations How Effici...
 
SLP1 Example Excellent Ford, Inc.NOTE This is an example of id.docx
SLP1 Example Excellent Ford, Inc.NOTE This is an example of id.docxSLP1 Example Excellent Ford, Inc.NOTE This is an example of id.docx
SLP1 Example Excellent Ford, Inc.NOTE This is an example of id.docx
 
Curriculum vitae riaan greyling 29 nov 2015
Curriculum vitae riaan greyling   29 nov 2015Curriculum vitae riaan greyling   29 nov 2015
Curriculum vitae riaan greyling 29 nov 2015
 
CV
CVCV
CV
 
Gama seliem portfolio
Gama seliem portfolioGama seliem portfolio
Gama seliem portfolio
 
ibrahim refaat cv
ibrahim refaat cvibrahim refaat cv
ibrahim refaat cv
 
Ahmed Allam RESUME 2014
Ahmed Allam RESUME 2014Ahmed Allam RESUME 2014
Ahmed Allam RESUME 2014
 
Annual Operating Plan PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Annual Operating Plan PowerPoint Presentation Slides Annual Operating Plan PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Annual Operating Plan PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 
hot shot trucking business plan
hot shot trucking business planhot shot trucking business plan
hot shot trucking business plan
 
Mid term exam1
Mid term exam1Mid term exam1
Mid term exam1
 
Annual Operating Plan Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Annual Operating Plan Powerpoint Presentation SlidesAnnual Operating Plan Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Annual Operating Plan Powerpoint Presentation Slides
 
Eng Abdul Razek CV
Eng Abdul Razek CVEng Abdul Razek CV
Eng Abdul Razek CV
 
Yearly Business Plan Report PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Yearly Business Plan Report PowerPoint Presentation SlidesYearly Business Plan Report PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Yearly Business Plan Report PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 

Business School

  • 1. Business School & Economics Professional & Management Development Centre MSc in STRATEGIC AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP MANAGEMENT` PROJECT ©DEALERSHIP GROWTH PRE SALES MAXIMIZE PROFITABILITY (Field Experiment) by STYLIANOS LAPATHIOTIS Student ID: A912902 June 2012
  • 2. n the competitive environment of the later 20th century, innovations in competitive strategy have life cycles of 10 to 15 years. Each innovation is followed by major changes in competitive positions and in corporate fortunes as these changes occur, concerned managements struggle to understand the nature of their competitor’s advantage, such as the live example of Toyota Hellas and VW Greece, in the last fifteen years. However like in the military secret, the new source of advantage becomes understood by all and is no longer an exploitable innovation. Therefore a new innovation must be found! Today’s innovation, within the Greek 2010 crisis crunch, is time and quality based competition. Demanding executives at aggressive dealerships are altering their measures of performance from competitive costs and quality, to competitive costs, quality and responsiveness. Give customers what they want, when they want it. Just – in – time. "I was first introduced to the concepts of just-in-time (JIT) and the Toyota Production System in 1980. Subsequently I had the opportunity to witness its actual application on one of our numerous Japanese study missions. There I met Mr Taiichi Ohno, the system's creator. When bombarded with questions from our group on what inspired his thinking, he just laughed and said he learned it all from Henry Ford's book. I discovered that many of the ideas we call ''just-in-time'' came from the way Henry Ford organized his production process. In 1926 it took his workers only 81 hours to go from iron ore to finish an automobile… …He believed strongly in allowing the workers to benefit from what they were actually producing. He reduced the price of a car in half and doubled worker wages from $2.50 to $5.00 daily". [3] (N. Bodek,2003). Time based competitors are offering greater varieties of products and services at lower costs and in less time. The main aim of this project is to attempt to estimate the population density and distribution of the Productivity knowledge of Ford dealer management and personnel in the Hellenic Automobile Market. To determine their ability and capability to record, measure, and analyze their actual effectiveness level in each Ford dealership by implementing new "tools" or using the existing, for forecasting and achieving the ultimate for the dealership goal – profit. To achieve this, the primary goal of this project is to define and establish within the Ford dealer management and personnel, the attitude that the dealership is a "production line" and its two (2) kind of products are Sales Labour Hours in the showroom, and After Sales Labour Hours in the Service Parts, and B/P departments. The objective is therefore, to change the mentality and the way of thinking of all Ford dealer management and personnel, in the proper use of existing dealership IT ‘tools’ given by Ford of Europe (LMS) or own, in order to achieve measurable presales of Sales Labour Hours which will generate new and used vehicles sales, and Workshop Labour Hours, which in turn will generate sales of spare parts and material during a given period of time. Cost reduction and productivity improvement are attained through the elimination of various ‘wastes’ such as excessive inventory, excessive workforce and excessive lost and idle times. I
  • 3. The main purpose of the project is to eliminate through improvement activities, after recording, measuring, analyzing, and correcting various kinds of ‘waste’ lying concealed within a dealership operation. Even during periods of slow or even zero growth, the dealership can make profit by decreasing costs through a ‘production system’ that eliminates excessive inventory, workforce, and non productive times. It would probably not be said that this is another revolutionary production management system, of new and used car sales, and service labor hours sales. It follows the Henry Ford ‘continuous improvement’ System and Toyota’s Production System (TPS). It is based on the fundamentals of scientific analysis in which the Manager analyzes the input DMS data by the front line personnel to understand how walk in customers in the showroom and the service shop, want-need-act, so that they can learn how to influence them and service them better. The small gradual changes of continuous improvement, applied over a period, result on the ability in forecasting sales and after sales achievements, adding up on major impacts on dealership financial results.  Within March 1999 – January 2003, started and completed the ‘HR Management for maximum competitive benefit in the After Sales’ field experiment project, with the participation of five (5) Toyota Hellas Dealer service shops.  The Service shop manager by recording, measuring and improving workforce efficiency and utilization, can calculate and predefine productivity and therefore can estimate departmental revenue and profitability. Hence being able to determine from the beginning of a given period of time, the labor hours pre-sold. This project in the workshop proves that ‘tomorrow can be predicted, estimated and achieved’, within the human capabilities.  The Ford Motor Hellas ‘Dealership Growth, Presales maximize Profitability’ project, commenced in September 2009 with the participation of three (3) pilot Showrooms and seven (7) sales persons. From January – December 2011 the project extended to six (6) showrooms and nineteen (19) sales persons, representing the 53% of FMH Total Sales and 22% of the FMH Sales force in 2011. Its purpose is to maximize sales efficiency of the existing showroom traffic in order to achieve personal or showroom set sales objectives. The Program ‘Maximizing Sales Person’s Effectiveness’ The program’s aim is to secure from the beginning of the time period that the individual or department sales objectives (registrations) will be accomplished. The application is based on the recovery of the recorded average showroom visits of the showroom during past months. The sales person is knowing from the beginning of the period the individual or departmental sales objectives. How to start? Apply simple thinking, and start from the end!
  • 4. The actual results of the showrooms and the sales persons objectives achievement, for the Full Year 2011 indicate also that ‘Tomorrow can be Managed in the Dealership’, achieving presales for the Business Financial Benefit even into a deep economic recession and the Hellenic crisis crunch been in full extend since 2008 and still continues… MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011 Dealer A (Argyroupoli Branch) YEAR 2011 SALESMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SALESMAN D SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL MONTH OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL WALK- IN JANUARY 8 10 8 9 8 7 8 8 32 34 106 FEBRUARY 10 10 10 12 10 11 10 11 40 44 135 MARCH 11 12 11 12 11 13 11 13 44 50 135 APRIL 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 40 41 116 AUGUST 7 8 7 7 7 7 7 10 28 32 108 JUNE 7 10 7 10 7 6 7 7 28 33 107 JULY 7 7 7 6 7 10 7 10 28 33 99 AUGUST 6 5 6 6 6 3 6 5 24 19 87 SEPTEMBER 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 40 40 124 OCTOBER 10 11 10 12 10 12 10 10 40 46 126 NOVEMBER 10 13 10 11 10 12 10 11 40 47 135 DECEMBER 11 16 11 15 11 18 11 17 44 66 112 TOTAL 107 123 107 120 107 119 107 122 428 485 1390 SHOWROOM ACTUAL ACHIEVEMENT: 113% MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011 Dealer B (Mesogeion Branch) YEAR 2011 SALEMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL Month OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL WALK- IN JANUARY 4 4 5 7 5 7 14 16 70 FEBRUARY 6 5 6 3 6 6 18 14 147 MARCH 8 8 5 11 6 4 19 25 149 APRIL 5 5 5 11 5 5 15 21 125 AUGUST 4 4 5 5 6 7 15 15 85 JUNE 4 5 5 8 5 6 14 18 100 JULY 5 5 4 6 5 5 14 16 70 AUGUST 4 5 4 3 4 6 12 12 61 SEPTEMBER 4 4 2 6 4 2 10 14 85 OCTOBER 2 2 9 2 5 5 16 9 71 NOVEMBER 4 3 4 8 4 4 12 15 76 DECEMBER 5 5 3 3 4 4 12 12 66 TOTAL 55 55 57 73 59 61 171 187 1105 SHOWROOMACHIEVEMENT: 109,4%
  • 5. MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011 Dealer A (Rossignol Branch) YEAR 2011 SALEMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL Month OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL WALK-IN JANUARY 9 11 9 9 9 9 27 29 92 FEBRUARY 9 9 9 11 9 8 27 29 86 MARCH 9 11 9 15 9 11 27 35 129 APRIL 10 12 10 11 10 10 30 33 119 AUGUST 9 13 9 10 9 9 27 32 104 JUNE 10 10 10 12 10 10 30 32 95 JULY 11 9 11 8 11 12 33 28 90 AUGUST 10 5 10 8 10 8 30 23 71 SEPTEMBER 10 12 10 9 10 11 30 31 114 OCTOBER 10 12 10 13 10 10 30 35 91 NOVEMBER 11 13 11 11 11 12 33 35 117 DECEMBER 8 10 8 9 8 7 24 27 82 TOTAL 116 127 116 126 116 117 348 370 1190 SHOWROOMACHIEVEMENT: 106.3% MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011 Dealer A (Patra Branch) YEAR 2011 SALEMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL Month OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL WALK-IN JANUARY 3 1 3 2 3 1 9 4 39 FEBRUARY 5 5 5 5 5 7 15 17 49 MARCH 6 7 6 7 6 8 18 22 55 APRIL 5 5 5 5 5 5 15 15 38 AUGUST 4 5 4 4 4 4 12 13 41 JUNE 3 2 3 1 3 3 9 6 37 JULY 4 4 4 5 4 4 12 14 46 AUGUST 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 23 SEPTEMBER 4 5 4 4 4 4 12 13 32 OCTOBER 4 5 4 5 4 4 12 14 35 NOVEMBER 7 7 7 7 7 7 21 21 38 DECEMBER 7 6 7 7 7 7 21 20 31 TOTAL 55 55 55 55 55 57 165 168 464 SHOWROOMACHIEVEMENT: 101,8%
  • 6. MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011 Dealer A (Pireos Branch) YEAR 2011 SALEMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL Month OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL WALK-IN JANUARY 7 9 7 7 7 8 21 24 88 FEBRUARY 7 7 7 7 7 7 21 21 79 MARCH 7 10 7 8 7 8 21 26 82 APRIL 6 7 6 7 6 8 18 22 75 MAY 7 6 7 8 7 6 21 20 74 JUNE 7 7 7 7 7 8 21 22 71 JULY 6 5 6 7 6 7 18 19 65 AUGUST 7 7 7 6 7 7 21 20 71 SEPTEMBER 7 8 7 6 7 7 21 21 80 OCTOBER 7 7 7 8 7 7 21 22 86 NOVEMBER 9 10 9 10 9 11 27 31 81 DECEMBER 6 6 6 5 6 4 18 15 59 TOTAL 83 89 83 86 83 88 249 263 911 SHOWROOMACHIEVEMENT: 105,6% MAXIMIZING SALES EFFECTIVENESS JAN - DEC 2011 Dealer B (Glyka Nera Branch) YEAR SALEMAN A SALESMAN B SALESMAN C SHOWROOM SHOWROOM TOTAL Month OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL OBJECTIVE ACTUAL WALK-IN JANUARY 7 7 3 1 7 9 17 17 79 FEBRUARY 7 7 5 7 7 7 19 21 82 MARCH 7 8 6 8 7 10 20 26 88 APRIL 6 7 5 5 6 7 17 19 75 AUGUST 7 8 4 4 7 6 18 18 74 JUNE 7 7 3 3 7 7 17 17 71 JULY 6 7 4 4 6 5 16 16 86 AUGUST 7 6 3 3 7 7 17 16 71 SEPTEMBER 7 6 4 4 7 8 18 18 78 OCTOBER 7 8 4 4 7 7 18 19 67 NOVEMBER 9 10 7 7 9 10 25 27 81 DECEMBER 6 5 7 7 6 6 19 18 64 TOTAL 83 86 55 57 83 89 221 232 916 SHOWROOM ACHIEVEMENT: 105,0%
  • 7. CONCLUSIONS The reported annual actual sales achievement reached from 101% to113% of the total sales objectives. As it is seen, sales persons do not achieve every month the set objective, but the showroom achieves its objective every month. The reason is, as mention all participants of the involved to the project showrooms, that according to the continuous improvement procedures they set in their daily operation and function, with reporting and investigating continuously records in order to make minor changes, their personal and showroom results have improved considerably. They can now operate even within the economic crisis with less stress and the pressure assists them to perform more efficiently and productively. The information and data collected, have to do with enriching the dealership area of influence customer profile (CRM). Special attention is given by starting measuring Customer Abandonment index.