All credit goes to www.RealHistorywww.com

1. The reasons for Black Slavery

2. • There is no question that the Albino people of Europe,
by way of Central Asia, (the least populous humans):
have killed more of the Earths creatures - some to
extinction, human and nonhuman - than any other
Homo-sapien. Their partial tally - the Tasmanian people
are now Extinct: 90 million Black and Mongol - mostly
Black - original Americans were killed during the
conquest of the Americas. Untold millions of Africans
were killed in Africa, fighting to be free, and as a result
of the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade. And untold millions of
Blacks were killed in the "Race Wars" falsely reported
as "Catholic/Protestant Religious Wars", for sovereignty
over Europe.

3. • Background: In the beginning, as Humans started to leave
Africa, included with the second (OOA) group were the
Albinos of Caucasian phenotype Africans (Horn Africans,
Dravidians (Indians) who were probably motivated by a
quest for relief from the heat and burning Sunshine of
southern Africa - and relief from the torment heaped
upon them by normal Africans. Even today, superstitious
Blacks of southern Africa; maim and mutilate Albinos in
the ignorant belief that their body parts process magical
properties, which they use in rituals. After they crossed
the Arabian Peninsula and entered what is now India, the
decided to head north and eventually ended up in Central
Asia.

4. • There they found a low sunlight intensity
environment to their liking, and there they
stayed, and flourished!

5. • Then, at about 1,500 B.C. the Central Asian
Albinos decided to start leaving their low
sunlight intensity environment, and return to
India as invading Aryans. Soon after, they
headed WEST toward Europe. It can only be
guessed at, but perhaps after Millennia in
Central Asia, the Albinos forgot that they
were Albinos, and what devastating effect
strong Sunlight could have on them.

6. • For after their conquest of Europe in the late medieval "Race Wars": Historically
camouflaged as Civil Wars in Britain, and the supposedly Religious "Thirty Years
Wars" on the continent. Note there really was a religious component to the
"Thirty Years Wars": That being the original Black Europeans (Catholics) verses
insurgent original Central Asian Albinos (Germanics & Slav's) under the banner of
their newly created "PROTEST" or "Protestant" Religions. i.e. Anglican,
Episcopalian, Presbyterian, Methodist, Lutheran, Baptist, Amish, Evangelicalism,
Pentecostalism, Quakers, Seventh-Day Adventism, et al. After the conquest, the
Catholic Church was also usurped, but the Slav's in the East (like the Rus
(Russians), chose not to completely overhaul the Eastern Orthodox branch that
they took from the Byzantines. As a result, their Holy icons still have "Dark" Skin.
The later arriving Turks took over the Black Arabs newly created religion of Islam.
After their conquest of Europe, the Albinos went on to conquer the entire
WORLD, and each place they settled brought them the SAME problems:
SUNBURN and SKIN CANCER. Because they don't belong in those places, their
one and ONLY home is Central Asia!

7. The Albino Enslavers
• European Albinos who chose to settle in areas of
the Earth between 40 degrees North and 40
degrees South; knew fully well that they would
NOT be able to do the FARMWORK necessary to
support themselves with FOOD in those areas
due to the Damaging/Killing strength of the
Sun’s UV radiation at those latitudes. So they
resolved to use the Slave Labor of pigmented
people as a means to supply themselves with
enough Food to live in those Latitudes.

8. • After Slavery was outlawed, they had to PAY
pigmented workers to do that same work: so
were they still Parasites? Actually yes, because
by that time they had used the wealth and
position created by slavery to structure societies
to where the pigmented workers of Food
production were the lowest class and the lowest
paid, and thus eternally trapped in the Parasitic
relationship. Even the advent of Mechanized
agriculture has not done away with the need for
Pigmented Workers in those areas, because
many Crops cannot be harvested by machines.

9. • It is well understood that the Albinos so low
as to use the Slavery of others as a means to
support themselves were the most
degenerate and Murderous of all Albinos. But
seeing the actual manifestation of this
degeneracy is still shocking.

10. • The Island of Tasmania sits South-east of
Australia just outside of the Albino "Death
Zone" for the Suns Ultra Violet Rays. In this
place it was "SAFE" for Albinos to "Work
Their Own Fields". So having no need to
Enslave the Native Black people for their
labors, what did they do with them?

11. • As is typical with Albinos as the worlds historians,
when the truth hurts Albinos image, they change the
story. After many years of accepting William Lanne or
Laney, who died in 1869 as the last Tasmanian. The
Albinos, having seen the Worlds attitude toward
them change, they can no longer revel in their power
to kill by whim. So not surprisingly, we now see the
Albino boys at Wiki, hard at work producing articles
which confuse Tasmanian’s with mainland Australian
Aborigines, and then declare that MORE Tasmanians
(proportionally) are still alive than Aborigines.

12. • Sick people that they are, their best lie is that
they have killed more Blacks on the Mainland
(proportionally), than they have in Tasmania.
The simple concept that Civilized Humans
think it wrong to murder, or to settle lands
where you cannot survive naturally, never
occurs to them.

13. • For hundreds of years now, beginning just
after the usurpation of Black rule in Europe
during the 1600s. Albinos have made it their
business to scour the world for every last bit
of historical artifact and information they can
find. They do this not because of a love of
history, but rather to “CONTROL HISTORY” so
as to shape it’s telling to support their self-
serving lies.

14. • As an example of how Albinos “Manage” and
“Censor” History to suit their needs: the
following was a part of the Wikipedia
historical article on the Tasmanians until
sometime in 2017, when it was decided by
person or persons unknown, that it should be
changed – no doubt because it showed
Albinos in too “True” a light.

15. • "OLD"-Wiki: Quote: The last of the Tasmanians,
William Lanne or Laney, died in 1869. Dr.
Lodewyk Crowther removed his head in the
name of science at the Colonial Hospital, and
made a tobacco pouch out of his scrotum.
• Now the only place where that little detail can
still be found is in a Wiki article titled “Human
Trophy Collecting”. No doubt that will soon be
“Sanitized” too.

16. ARGENTINA
• European immigration in the 19th century (mainly Italian, Spanish
,French , Welsh, Jewish, and to a lesser extent, Russian) focused on
colonization and was sponsored by the government (on lands
conquered from the native inhabitants). This immigration wave
made Argentina the country with the second-largest number of
White immigrants, with 6.6 million, second only to the United
States. Most Argentines are descended from colonial-era settlers
and of the 19th and 20th century immigrants from Europe, and
86.4% of Argentina’s population self-identify as (White) European
descent. An estimated 8% of the population is mestizo, and a
further 4% of Argentines were of Arab or East Asian heritage. In the
last national census, based on self-identification, 600,000
Argentines (1.6%) declared to be Amerindians.

17. • In 2001, Maria Lamadrid an Afro-Argentine advocate of
black rights in Argentina was detained for six hours at
the Buenos Aires Ezeiza International Airport for
presenting a “fake Passport”. The authorities of her
country airport claimed that she could not be
Argentine because she is black. For these custom
officers like many other Argentines, today there are no
more black Argentines. They are believed to have been
wiped out by some combinations of wars and epidemic
diseases. Actually, something quite different happened
that makes Argentina to be considered today the
whitest country in Latin America.

18. • During the 19 th. Century, scientific racism appeared. It was
a philosophy based on an interpretation of Charles Darwin’s
Theory of Evolution. It shaped the sociopolitical vision of
the whole Latin America. Interestingly, not only the whites,
but also the blacks to some extent, espoused the idea of
whitening the society. Gradually, the outcome would be a
merging of black Argentines into the society by cultural and
also biological whitening. Though, this process occurred
throughout the entire Latin America in the 19 th. Century
yet, nowhere else but in Argentina it was so successful, to
the point that today, even Argentines for the most part,
barely know that they have a black history and more even
Afro-Argentine minority that still exists.

19. • At the dawn of the 19 th. Century, Latin America was experiencing a
period of economic prosperity called the “export boom”. “The
Second Industrial Revolution” (Andrews P. 117) in the North
Hemisphere countries was in huge need of raw material from Latin
America. The export boom years progressively created a social
system in which those who had prestige and power where those
having access to Europe and the US. Power then shifted from the
caudillo sand country landlords to cities like Buenos Aires. And with
such shifting, also shifted the way Argentines viewed themselves
comparatively to the northern societies. Argentines elites started
aping Europe and the US in the hope of bringing development and
raising their country to the northern standards. It was “the years of
scientific racism and social Darwinism” (Andrews P.118). It
essentially states that because the white nations have succeeded
subjugating the world through military conquests, economic and
industrial prowess, therefore the white race is superior to all others.

20. • After centuries of colonization, slavery and interracial mingling, it meant
for Latin America to radically turn the page on its past: “in order to be
civilized, Latin America had to become white” (Andrews P. 118). Basically,
Social Darwinism was a scientific and rational way to justify racism. It was
used by the Latin American elites at that time to put forth the whitening
of their societies because as pointed by R. Blanco a Venezuelan
intellectual, “there was no salvation unless they solved how to become a
Caucasian country” (Andrews P. 118). And F. Ortiz a Cuban intellectual to
pursue: “The black race has proven itself to be more delinquent than the
white situated in the identical social position” therefore, “not only the
society had to be whitened racially and demographically but, it has to
whiten culturally and esthetically as well” (Andrews P. 119). It was the
time where the developing industry of Argentina needed a huge labor
force. And, “the Argentines, swore allegiance to the same racial concepts
held by the Europeans, holding white skin and European ancestry to be
the most valuable asset a person could have” (Andrews, Georges Reid P.
79). So instead of naturally using the black local labor force, they turned to
European immigration.

21. • It was thought to be the best to do, to get an educated and conscientious labor
force that would raise the national level of education and culture up to western
standards. Also, it was believed that “the white Europeans were industrious
reliable and responsible while the blacks, lazy recalcitrant and irresponsible.”
(Andrews P. 143). The effectiveness of the whitening policy in Argentina has greatly
to do with how Afro-Argentines themselves responded to scientific racism and
whitening. They were in a logic of survival so, a great majority simply chose no
longer to be black. It is essential to contextualize to understand. In Latin America
far back in the colonial system, “the royal government established a procedure
whereby nonwhites could legally purchase the racial labels and prerogatives of
white people. Gracias al sacar, as this system was known, was Spain's attempt to
generate revenue from a practice that had proceeded quietly and informally for
centuries in the new World” (Andrews, G. Reid P. 82). Acculturation and
miscegenation were the options most often pursued” (L. Marvin, Cry for Afro-
Argentines P. 133), and when light enough added to the fact of being wealthy; it
was natural to pass for white. Which explains why “a number of important
individuals in nineteenth-century Argentina seem to have been men of mixed Afro-
Indo-European descent who were accepted by the society of the time as white”
(Andrews, Georges Reid P. 83).

22. • Whitening took place among the black middle class, simply because they could
afford to live and act like whites. They attended theaters and private literary salons
like it was done in Paris or had afternoon tea like in England. They dressed like
Europeans, purchased the most up to date European fashion outfits, and enjoyed
European music and ballet. They according to an approving white elite “danced in
modern clothes in the manner of Louis XV instead of the grotesque candombe or
samba,” (Andrews P. 127). It was possible because in Latin America, “there were
other social and personal factors, such as wealth and education,which determined
a man's worth and social position. It was then not proper to call persons of respect
Negro” (Andrews, G. Reid P. 84). Accordingly, the Latin American society made up
new terms to designate such people of African heritage, not of white phenotype
but nevertheless belonging to the white category because of their wealth.
“Trigueño was such term. It literally means wheat color and helped as a social
device for black people to avoid the stigma of their African ancestry ” (Andrews, G.
Reid P. 85). However it is worth noticing that, “Although trigueño could be applied
to whites, especially the Mediterranean type, it was more closely associated with
African descent than was generally admitted ” (Andrews, G. Reid P. 85). On the
other hand, the detachment the black middle class had from its Afro-roots could
not be afforded by the black working class.

23. • The later reminded the former that contrarily to what they might think; both were
on the same boat. Because, like wrote a poet: “For a mulatto of stained caste - For
a vile nigger of a different makeup - Give me a chain and a noose!” (L.Marvin, The
Romantic Mode in Afro-Argentines Letters P. 47). Also, considering the socio and
historical heritage of their country, the working class questioned the middle one:
“How does one not tremble before the insult and the wicked humiliation - that the
white race casts on our soil upon the colored race?” (L. Marvin, The Romantic
Mode in Afro-Argentines Letters P. 41). They were appealing to the authorities and
also the well off Afro-Argentines because the massive white immigration virtually
put the black working class out of work. As some pointed, “the greater was the
number of immigrants, the more devastating were the impacts on local black
populations” (Andrews P. 142). Consequently with virtually no means of
subsistence in Buenos Aires, the majority of the black working class ended up
living in crowded city slums. Ultimately, “Black fertility though slightly higher than
white, was not enough to overcome the differential between the two races' infant
mortality” (Andrews, G. Reid P. 73). And because “the rural areas of the province
formed a more healthy environment for black people than the capital, it resulted
in a shift of Afro-Argentine population from the city to the hinterland” (Andrews,
G. Reid P. 75).

24. • Indubitably, such dichotomy of conceiving things among the black community deeply weakened
them as a whole. “They were unable to forge a collective identity as a people and advocate for the
common good” instead they cultivated “a strife within organizations, rivalry among competing
newspapers, and frustration of individual leaders” (L. Marvin, Cry for Afro-Argentines P. 127 & 133).
Conclusively, if today Argentina seems to be the whitest country in Latin it has more to do with the
social and not biological understanding of race in Latin America. Because of the stigma associated
of having African background, “both the blacks and the whites politely decided to ignore the extent
of African ancestry in the population” (Andrews, Georges Reid P. 85). This is why it is highly
probable that “the most important determinant behind the absolute decline of the population in
the 1838-87 period was not low birth rates or high death rates (though these unquestionably
contributed to the decline), but rather the statistical transference of a large segment of the Afro-
Argentine population from the black racial category to the white” (Andrews, Georges Reid P. 89)
also coupled with the massive European immigration of the 19 th. Century. Finally, when looking
closer to the situation, “As the races became more intermingled, racial barriers became increasingly
ill-defined” (Andrews, Georges Reid P. 88). To some extent, the whitening process has not fully been
a success because still up today, a major fringe of the Argentine population refers itself as being
“moracho” which is basically everything but white and the black culture survived in the culture and
music like the Tango, which is world widely known as an Argentine trademark.

25. Chile
• Chile is home to people of many different
ethnic backgrounds. Studies on the ethnic
structure of Chile "vary" significantly from one
another. An autosomal DNA study from 2014
found out Chile to be 44.34% (± 3.9%) native
American, 51.85% (± 5.44%) European and
3.81% (± 0.45%) African. A 2015 study
analyzing hundreds of thousands of SNPs
yielded similar results — around 55%
European, 43% Native, and 2% African.

26. • A public health book from the University of
Chile states that 30% of the population is of
Caucasian origin; Mestizos with an average
60% Caucasian ancestry and 40% Native
American ancestry are estimated to amount a
total of 65%, while Native Americans
(Amerindians) comprise the remaining 5%. A
genetic study by the same university showed
that the average Chilean's genes are 64%
Caucasian and 35% Amerindian.

27. • UNAM professor of Latin American studies, Francisco
Lizcano, in his social research estimates that a
predominant 52.7% of the Chilean population can be
classified as culturally European, with an estimated
44% as Mestizo. Other social studies put the total
amount of Whites at over 60 percent. Some
publications, such as the CIA World Factbook, state
that the entire population consist of a combined 95.4%
of "Whites and White-Amerindians", and 4.6% of
Amerindians. These figures are based on a national
census held in 2002, which classified the population as
indigenous and non-indigenous, rather than as White
or Mestizo.

28. • Despite the genetic considerations, many
Chileans, if asked, would self-identify as white.
The 2011 Latinobarómetro survey asked
respondents in Chile what race they considered
themselves to belong to. Most answered "white"
(59%), while 25% said "mestizo" and 8% self-
classified as "indigenous". A 2002 national poll
revealed that a majority of Chileans believed they
possessed some (43.4%) or much (8.3%)
"indigenous blood", while 40.3% responded that
they had none.

29. • Chile's 2002 census reported a population of
15,116,435 people. Its rate of population
growth has been decreasing since 1990, due
to a "declining birth rate."

30. • Spain conquered and colonised Chile in the mid-16th century, replacing
Inca rule in northern and central Chile, but failing to conquer the
independent Mapuche that inhabited south-central Chile. After declaring
its independence from Spain in 1818, Chile emerged in the 1830s as a
relatively stable authoritarian republic. In the 19th century, Chile saw
significant economic and territorial growth, by conquering the Mapuche in
the 1880s, and gaining its current northern territory in the War of the
Pacific (1879–83) after defeating Peru and Bolivia. In the late 1960s and
early 1970s, the country experienced severe left-right political polarization
and turmoil. This development culminated with the 1973 Chilean coup
d'état that overthrew Salvador Allende's left-wing government and
instituted a 16-year-long right-wing military dictatorship that left more
than 3,000 people dead or missing. The regime headed by Augusto
Pinochet ended in 1990 after it lost a referendum in 1988 and was
succeeded by a centre-left coalition which ruled through four presidencies
until 2010.

31. • Like Canada, because it was able to "early-on"
successfully "subdue/eradicate" it's native populations,
Chile is today one of South America's most stable and
prosperous nations. It leads Latin American nations in
rankings of human development, competitiveness,
income per capita, globalization, state of peace,
economic freedom, and low perception of corruption.
It also ranks high regionally in sustainability of the
state, and democratic development. Chile is a founding
member of the United Nations, the Union of South
American Nations and the Community of Latin
American and Caribbean States.

32. Why are Jews nonwhite?
• Eugenics (from Greek "well-born") is the belief and practice which
aims at improving the genetic quality of the human population
through the promotion of higher reproduction of people with
desired traits (positive eugenics), and reduced reproduction and or
sterilization of people with less-desired or undesired traits (negative
eugenics). The modern history of eugenics began in the early 20th
century when a popular eugenics movement emerged in Britain
and spread to many countries, including the US and most European
countries. In this period eugenic ideas were espoused across the
political spectrum. Consequently, many countries adopted eugenic
policies meant to improve the genetic stock of their countries. Such
programs often included both "positive" measures, such as
encouraging individuals deemed particularly "fit" to reproduce, and
"negative" measures such as marriage prohibitions and forced
sterilization of people deemed unfit for reproduction.

33. • People deemed unfit to reproduce often included
people with mental or physical disabilities, people who
scored in the low ranges of different IQ tests, criminals
and deviants, and members of disfavored minority
groups. The eugenics movement reached a climax in
Nazi Germany where a state policy of racial hygiene
based on eugenic principles led to the Holocaust and
the murder by the German state of at least 10 million
people. In the decades following World War II, with the
institution of human rights, many countries gradually
abandoned eugenics policies, although some Western
countries, among them Sweden and the US, continued
to carry out forced sterilizations for several decades.