2. 2
INTRODUCTION
CYBERNETICS DEFINITION
BLACK BOX CONCEPT
CLASSIFICATION OF CONTROL SYSTEMS
ELEMENTS OF SERVOSYSTEM THEORY
TYPES OF CARTILAGE
ROLE OF LPM & RDP ON CONDYLAR GROWTH
EXPLANATION OF SERVOSYSTEM THEORY
GROWTH OF MAXILLA
Growth in width
Growth in length
3. 3
GRAPH – INTERACTION BETWEEN LPM ACTIVITY &
HORMONES
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
MODE OF ACTION OF FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCES (based
on servosystem theory)
EVIDENCES AGAINST THE THEORY
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
4. Over many years various theories of growth have been proposed for the
craniofacial complex.
SERVOSYSTEM THEORY – BY ALEXANDRE PETROVIC (1977) ,
relies on the components of cybernetics to describe the growth of the
craniofacial complex.
4
5. CYBERNETICS
Weiner defines cybernetics as the science
of control and communication in the
animal and machine.
Ashby defines it as the study of systems
that are open to energy but closed to
information and control.
5
8. Open Loop
• Output has no affect on the input.
• Has no feedback loop or comparator.
8
9. Closed Loop
• Characterized by presence of feedback loop & comparator
• Has 2 variations- regulator & servosystem
INPUT COMPARATOR TRANSFER FUNCTION
OUTPUT
Feedback loop
9
10. Closed Loop
REGULATOR TYPE-
Input is constant.
E.g.- temperature regulation system of the body
REGULATION OF INPUT
SERVOSYSTEM TYPE-
Input is not constant, varies with time.
10
(change in temp) (Hypothalamus) (Piloerection or shivering)
11. COMMAND
• E.g.- The secretion rate of growth hormone
somatomedin, testosterone and estrogen.
REFRENCE
INPUT
ELEMENTS
• E.g.- The septal cartilage, the septopremaxillary
frenum, the labionarinary muscles & the
premaxillary & maxillary bones
ELEMENTS OF SERVOSYSTEM THEORY -
• E.g. – sagittal position of maxilla.
REFRENCE
INPUT
11
13. 13
COMPARATOR
PERIPHERAL CENTRAL
The input is fed into the
comparator, which is the
component that analyses
the reference input &
judges the performance
of the system through
performance judging
elements.
The performance
judging elements then
transmit a deviation
signal to the central
comparator which
sends signal to various
components.
14. GAIN
• OUTPUT/INPUT
• Gain > 1= Amplification (GH-somatomedin,
small amt. of testosterone)
• Gain < 1 = Attenuation
(large amt. of testosterone, large amt. of
estrogen)
DISTURBANCE
• E.g. – The supplementary lengthening
caused by growth hormone- somatomedin (
mandible > maxilla)
• Full interdigitation of occlusal
relationship(class I)
REPELLER • E.g.- cusp to cusp
ATTRACTOR
14
15. 15
A- primary cartilages ( nasal septum, cartilage between greater wings &
body of sphenoid)
B- secondary cartilages ( condyle , coronoid )
18. 18
The CNS serves as the central comparator for the servosystem
It is collection of feedback loops, that records the activity of masticatory
muscles corresponding to a particular, habitual mandibular position. It
acts as a blueprint.
Any particular muscle action or mandibular position that gives the
minimum deviation signal is recorded in the sensory engram.
Sensory engram-
Lavergne J, Petrovic A. Discontinuities in occlusal relationship and the regulation of facial growth. A cybernetic view. Eur J
Orthod. 1983 Nov;5(4):269-78.
19. Explanation of servosystem theory-
Somatomedin - primary &
secondary cartilage – maxilla growth
Maxillary dental arch carried into a
slight more anterior position – 1st
event
Causes minute discrepancies- U/L
arch- referred as comparator
Comparator senses – chance in
performance (the efficiency of
mastication)
Improper mastication - force on
periodontium, teeth, muscles, TMJ
(performance analyzing elements)
19
Position of maxillary dental
arch forms the reference
input.
Release of somatomedin
represents the command.
Cartilages acts as reference
input elements.
20. 20
Performance analyzing elements – CNS –
coupling system of lateral pterygoid
muscle n RDP.
Protruding muscles – acts on condylar
cartilage – results in mandible growth.
OUTPUT- forward growth of mandible.
22. 22
GROWTH OF MAXILLA
GROWTH IN LENGTH-
Release of
STH
Growth of
nasal septum
Increased size
of tongue
Septo-
premaxillary
ligament
Labio
narinary
muscles
Protrusion of
upper incisors
Protrusion of
lower incisors
Anterior shift
of
premaxillary
bones
Growth of
premaxillary
extremity
Growth of
premaxillo-
maxillary
suture
Growth of
maxilla
palatine
suture
Thrust
Traction
Direct action
23. 23
GROWTH OF MAXILLA
GROWTH IN WIDTH-
Release of
STH
Growth of lateral
cartilaginous masses
of ethmoid
Increased size
of tongue
Outwards
growth of
maxillary
bones
Growth of
cartilage b/w
greater wings &
body of sphenoid
Transverse
separation of
horizontal
maxilla &
palatine bones
Outwards
shift of
alveolus &
molars
Transverse
separation of
premaxilla
Growth of
inter
premaxillary
suture
Growth of
mid
palatine
suture
Outward
appositional
bone
Growth
24. 24
Diagram showing interaction between STH or testosterone secretion rates and LPM
activity on condylar cartilage growth.
g.m. – lengthening of the maxilla
g.c+ - growth of condylar cartilage after LPM is removed
g.c.++ - growth of condylar cartilage for mini. contractile activity of LPM.
g.c.+++ - growth of condylar cartilage for mean contractile activity of LPM.
g.c.++++ - growth of condylar cartilage for max. contractile activity of LPM.
25. 25
For every unit of STH or testosterone that is released , amt. of growth
( man > max )
At normal hormonal level N – good max-man relation is maintained
At T2 hormonal level – (man > max) – LPM is reduced
Beyond T2 hormonal level – LPM activity can no longer be reduced
– prognathism
The opposite happens when hormonal level is below T1 , below T1
hormonal level – LPM activity can no longer be increased –
retrognathism
Within levels T1- T2 , good max-man relation is maintained ,
outside these levels – malocclusion occurs.
26. 26
Clinical Significance-
It is used to explain the growth of mandible following functional
appliance therapy.
Useful as a research tool.
28. 28
Two types of functional appliances have been recognized to their
mode of action-
1. Appliances like the activator, frankel appliances, Twin block,
Bionator etc.
2. Appliances like the Herren & LSU activator , Extra oral
traction on the mandible, which position the mandible forward
and open it beyond the physiologic rest position.
Thomas M. Graber, Thomas Rakosi , Alexandre G. Petrovic. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances, second
edition, 1917
29. 29 FIRST GROUP-
When appliance is in place - activity of LPM & RPD – due to forward
positioning of the mandible.
Oudet et al & Carlson et al studies – non fatigable fibers in the LPM-
mandible grows in forward direction by deposition of bone at condyle.
LPM is helped to contract more by Functional appliances.
SECOND GROUP-
Position mandible forward , open beyond the rest position
no increase in activity of LPM, yet there is increase in growth
30. 30
Evidences against the theory-
Goret – Nicaise, Awn (1983) – resection of LPM - fails to diminish
condylar growth.
Whetten & Johnston (1985) – bilaterally condylectomy & unilateral
LPM in rats – same growth both sides
Das, Myer & Sicher (1980) – occlusion remained unaffected in
condylectomy studies.
Sridhar Premkumar . Textbook of Craniofacial Growth, first edition,2011
32. 32
Thomas M. Graber, Thomas Rakosi , Alexandre G. Petrovic. Dentofacial
orthopedics with functional appliances, second edition, 1917
Sridhar Premkumar . Textbook of Craniofacial Growth, first edition,2011
Lavergne J, Petrovic A. Discontinuities in occlusal relationship and the
regulation of facial growth. A cybernetic view. Eur J Orthod. 1983 Nov;5(4):269-
78.
Stutzmann JJ, Petrovic AG. Role of the lateral pterygoid muscle and
meniscotemporomandibular frenum in spontaneous growth of the mandible.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1990 May
1;97(5):381-92.
