Form & Content Julie Mehretus MuralDue Sunday by 1159p

Form & Content: Julie Mehretu's Mural
Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 30
Submitting a text entry box, a media recording, or a file upload
Start Assignment
Julie Mehretu
b. 1970 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Lives and works in New York
Education:
Bachelor of Arts degree – Kalamazoo College, Michigan 1992
Master of Fine Arts degree – Rhode Island School of Design,
Rhode Island 1997
“Mehretu’s paintings and drawings refer to elements of mapping
and architecture, achieving a
calligraphic complexity that resembles turbulent atmospheres
and dense social networks. Architectural
renderings and aerial views of urban grids enter the work as
fragments, losing their real-world specificity
and challenging narrow geographic and cultural readings. The
paintings’ wax-like surfaces—built up
over weeks and months in thin translucent layers—have a
luminous warmth and spatial depth. Their
formal qualities of light and space are made all the more
complex by Mehretu’s delicate depictions of
fire, explosions, and perspectives in both two and three
dimensions. Her works engage the history of
nonobjective art—from Constructivism to Futurism—posing
contemporary questions about the

relationship between utopian impulses and abstraction ”
relationship between utopian impulses and abstraction.
Source (https://art21.org/artist/julie-mehretu/)
(https://art21.org/artist/julie-mehretu/)
Julie Mehretu, Mural. 2009
https://art21.org/artist/julie-mehretu/
Julie Mehretu, Mural. 2009 (Detail showing architecture)
Julie Mehretu, Mural. 2009 Installation View
Watch the segment on Julie Mehretu (the first 15 minutes)
Systems: Art 21—Art in the Twenty-First Century (Se...
© Infobase. All Rights Reserved. Length: 56:13

Julie Mehretu: "Mural" | Art21 "Extended Play"Julie Mehretu:
"Mural" | Art21 "Extended Play"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4F9scZ3idM
Form & Content: Julie Mehretu's Mural
Discuss what you think the form and content are of Julie
Mehretu’s
painting Mural.
Below is an excerpt from Chapter 1 describing what is meant by
both form and content.
"Two basic considerations we need to be acquainted with are
form: the physical and
visible characteristics inherent in works of art, and content: the
meaning we derive from them.
Formal distinctions include a work's size, medium (painting,
drawing, sculpture or other kind of work)
and descriptions of compositional elements, such as the lines,
shapes, and colors involved. Issues of
content include any visual clues that provide an understanding
of what the art tells us. Sometimes an
artwork's content is vague or hidden and needs more
information than is present in the work itself.
Ultimately these two terms are roped together in the climb to
understand what art has to offer us."
In a paragraph respond to the following three questions.
1. In Julie Mehretu's painting Mural, is the subject
representational or abstract? Explain.

2. How does Mehretu arrange the visual elements (i.e. form) in
this composition? What elements (line,
shape, value, light, color, space, texture) are most prominent
and how are they used?
3. In your opinion, what is the underlying meaning of the
painting (i.e. content)? What message does
the artist convey?
Total Points: 30
Criteria Ratings Pts
10 pts
15 pts
5 pts
Define the painting as it relates to representational and abstract
subjects.
Analyze the painting based on its formal properties.
visual elements and principles of
design
threshold: 3.0 pts

9/27/21, 10:27 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-
BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16874433_1&rubric_i
d=_2559590_1 1/5
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Name: NURS_6512_Week_5_Assignment_1_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
d=_2559590_1 2/5
Using the
Episodic/Focused
SOAP Template:
· Create
documentation
or an
episodic/focused
note in SOAP

format about the
patient in the
case study to
which you were
assigned.
· Provide
evidence from
the literature to
support
diagnostic tests
that would be
appropriate for
your case.
45 (45%) - 50
(50%)
The response
clearly,
accurately, and
thoroughly
follows the
SOAP format
to document
the patient in
the assigned
case study. The
response
thoroughly and
accurately
provides
detailed
evidence from
the literature
to support

diagnostic
tests that
would be
appropriate for
the patient in
the assigned
case study.
39 (39%) - 44
(44%)
The
response
accurately
follows the
SOAP format
to document
the patient
in the
assigned
case study.
The
response
accurately
provides
detailed
evidence
from the
literature to
support
diagnostic
tests that
would be
appropriate
for the
patient in

the assigned
case study.
33 (33%) - 38
(38%)
The
response
follows the
SOAP format
to document
the patient
in the
assigned
case study,
with some
vagueness
and
inaccuracy.
The
response
provides
evidence
from the
literature to
support
diagnostic
tests that
would be
appropriate
for the
patient in
the assigned
case study,
with some
vagueness

or
inaccuracy in
the evidence
selected.
0 (0%) - 32
(32%)
The response
incompletely
and
inaccurately
follows the
SOAP format
to document
the patient in
the assigned
case study.
The response
provides
incomplete,
inaccurate,
and/or missing
evidence from
the literature
to support
diagnostic
tests that
would be
appropriate
for the patient
in the assigned
case study.

d=_2559590_1 3/5
· List �ve
di�erent
possible
conditions for
the patient's
di�erential
diagnosis, and
justify why you
selected each.
30 (30%) - 35
(35%)
The response
lists �ve
distinctly
di�erent and
detailed
possible
conditions for
a di�erential
diagnosis of
the patient in
the assigned
case study, and
provides a
thorough,
accurate, and

detailed
justi�cation for
each of the �ve
conditions
selected.
24 (24%) - 29
(29%)
The
response
lists four or
�ve di�erent
possible
conditions
for a
di�erential
diagnosis of
the patient
in the
assigned
case study
and
provides an
accurate
justi�cation
for each of
the �ve
conditions
selected.
18 (18%) - 23
(23%)
The
response

lists three to
�ve possible
conditions
for a
di�erential
diagnosis of
the patient
in the
assigned
case study,
with some
vagueness
and/or
inaccuracy in
the
conditions
and/or
justi�cation
for each.
0 (0%) - 17
(17%)
The response
lists two or
fewer, or is
missing,
possible
conditions for
a di�erential
diagnosis of
the patient in
the assigned
case study,
with inaccurate
or missing

justi�cation for
each condition
selected.
d=_2559590_1 4/5
Written
Expression and
Formatting -
Paragraph
Development
and
Organization:
Paragraphs
make clear
points that
support well-
developed ideas,
�ow logically,
and demonstrate
continuity of
ideas. Sentences
are carefully
focused--neither
long and
rambling nor
short and lacking
substance. A

clear and
comprehensive
purpose
statement and
introduction are
provided that
delineate all
required criteria.
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
�ow,
continuity, and
clarity. A clear
and
comprehensive
purpose
statement,
introduction,
and conclusion
are provided
that delineate
all required
criteria.
4 (4%) - 4
(4%)
Paragraphs
and
sentences
follow
writing

standards
for �ow,
continuity,
and clarity
80% of the
time.
Purpose,
introduction,
and
conclusion
of the
assignment
are stated,
yet are brief
and not
descriptive.
3 (3%) - 3
(3%)
Paragraphs
and
sentences
follow
writing
standards
for �ow,
continuity,
and clarity
60%–79% of
the time.
Purpose,
introduction,
and
conclusion
of the

assignment
are vague or
o� topic.
0 (0%) - 2 (2%)
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
�ow,
continuity, and
clarity < 60% of
the time. No
purpose
statement,
introduction,
or conclusion
were provided.
Written
Expression and
Formatting -
English writing
standards:
Correct
grammar,
mechanics, and
proper
punctuation
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4
(4%)
Contains a
few (1 or 2)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
3 (3%) - 3
(3%)
Contains
several (3 or
4) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
0 (0%) - 2 (2%)
Contains many
(≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors that
interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.

d=_2559590_1 5/5
Written
Expression and
Formatting - The
paper follows
correct APA
format for title
page, headings,
font,
spacing, margins,
indentations,
page numbers,
running heads,
parenthetical/in-
text citations,
and reference
list.
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct
APA format
with no errors.
4 (4%) - 4
(4%)
Contains a
few (1 or 2)
APA format
errors.
3 (3%) - 3

(3%)
Contains
several (3 or
4) APA
format
errors.
0 (0%) - 2 (2%)
Contains many
(≥ 5) APA
format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6512_Week_5_Assignment_1_Rubric
EXIT
Episodic/Focused SOAP Note Template
Patient Information:
Initials, Age, Sex, Race
S.
CC (chief complaint) a BRIEF statement identifying why the
patient is here - in the patient’s own words - for instance
"headache", NOT "bad headache for 3 days”.
HPI: This is the symptom analysis section of your note.
Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient
care, coding, and billing analysis. Paint a picture of what is
wrong with the patient. Use LOCATES Mnemonic to complete
your HPI. You need to start EVERY HPI with age, race, and
gender (e.g., 34-year-old AA male). You must include the seven
attributes of each principal symptom in paragraph form not a
list. If the CC was “headache”, the LOCATES for the HPI might

look like the following example:
Location: head
Onset: 3 days ago
Character: pounding, pressure around the eyes and temples
Associated signs and symptoms: nausea, vomiting, photophobia,
phonophobia
Timing: after being on the computer all day at work
Exacerbating/ relieving factors: light bothers eyes, Aleve makes
it tolerable but not completely better
Severity: 7/10 pain scale
Current Medications: include dosage, frequency, length of time
used and reason for use; also include OTC or homeopathic
products.
Allergies: include medication, food, and environmental allergies
separately (a description of what the allergy is ie angioedema,
anaphylaxis, etc. This will help determine a true reaction vs
intolerance).
PMHx: include immunization status (note date of last tetanus
for all adults), past major illnesses and surgeries. Depending on
the CC, more info is sometimes needed
Soc Hx: include occupation and major hobbies, family status,
tobacco & alcohol use (previous and current use), any other
pertinent data. Always add some health promo question here -
such as whether they use seat belts all the time or whether they
have working smoke detectors in the house, living environment,
text/cell phone use while driving, and support system.
Fam Hx: illnesses with possible genetic predisposition,
contagious or chronic illnesses. Reason for death of any
deceased first degree relatives should be included. Include
parents, grandparents, siblings, and children. Include
grandchildren if pertinent.
ROS: cover all body systems that may help you include or rule
out a differential diagnosis You should list each system as
follows: General:Head: EENT: etc. You should list these in
bullet format and document the systems in order from head to

toe.
Example of Complete ROS:
GENERAL: Denies weight loss, fever, chills, weakness or
fatigue.
HEENT: Eyes: Denies visual loss, blurred vision, double vision
or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat: Denies hearing loss,
sneezing, congestion, runny nose or sore throat.
SKIN: Denies rash or itching.
CARDIOVASCULAR: Denies chest pain, chest pressure or
chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.
RESPIRATORY: Denies shortness of breath, cough or sputum.
GASTROINTESTINAL: Denies anorexia, nausea, vomiting or
diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.
GENITOURINARY: Burning on urination. Pregnancy. Last
menstrual period, MM/DD/YYYY.
NEUROLOGICAL: Denies headache, dizziness, syncope,
paralysis, ataxia, numbness or tingling in the extremities. No
change in bowel or bladder control.
MUSCULOSKELETAL: Denies muscle, back pain, joint pain
or stiffness.
HEMATOLOGIC: Denies anemia, bleeding or bruising.
LYMPHATICS: Denies enlarged nodes. No history of
splenectomy.
PSYCHIATRIC: Denies history of depression or anxiety.
ENDOCRINOLOGIC: Denies reports of sweating, cold or heat
intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.
ALLERGIES: Denies history of asthma, hives, eczema or
rhinitis.
O.
Physical exam: From head-to-toe, include what you see, hear,
and feel when doing your physical exam. You only need to
examine the systems that are pertinent to the CC, HPI, and
History. Do not use “WNL” or “normal.” You must describe
what you see. Always document in head to toe format i.e.
General: Head: EENT: etc.
Diagnostic results: Include any labs, x-rays, or other diagnostics

that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses (support
with evidenced and guidelines)
A.
Differential Diagnoses (list a minimum of 5 differential
diagnoses).Your primary or presumptive diagnosis should be at
the top of the list. For each diagnosis, provide supportive
documentation with evidence based guidelines.
P.
This section is not required for the assignments in this course
(NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses.
References
You are required to include at least five evidence based peer -
reviewed journal articles or evidenced based guidelines which
relates to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials
diagnoses. Be sure to use correct APA 7th edition formatting.
© 2021 Walden University, LLC
Page 1 of 3
Assignment 1: Case Study Assignment: Assessing the Head,
Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat
Most ear, nose, and throat conditions that arise in non-critical
care settings are minor in nature. However, subtle symptoms
can sometimes escalate into life-threatening conditions that
require prompt assessment and treatment.
Nurses conducting assessments of the ears, nose, and throat
must be able to identify the small differences between life-
threatening conditions and benign ones. For instance, if a
patient with a sore throat and a runny nose also has inflamed

lymph nodes, the inflammation is probably due to the pathogen
causing the sore throat rather than a case of throat cancer. With
this knowledge and a sufficient patient health history, a nurse
would not need to escalate the assessment to a biopsy or an MRI
of the lymph nodes but would probably perform a simple strep
test.
In this Case Study Assignment, you consider case studies of
abnormal findings from patients in a clinical setting. You
determine what history should be collected from the patients,
what physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted,
and formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible
conditions.
To Prepare
· You will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case
Study Assignment. (See below the case study)
· Also, your Case Study Assignment should be in the
Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional
narrative style format. (see exemplar as a guide and the
template to use)
· Regarding the case study, you were assigned:
· Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the
patient.
· Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be
appropriate to gather more information about the patient's
condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
· Identify at least five possible conditions that may be
considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
CASE STUDY 2: Focused Throat Exam
Lily is a 20-year-old student at the local community college.
When some of her friends and classmates told her about an
outbreak of flu-like symptoms sweeping her campus during the
past 2 weeks, Lily figured she shouldn't take her 3-day sore

throat lightly. Your clinic has treated a few cases similar to
Lily's. All the patients reported decreased appetite, headaches,
and pain with swallowing. As Lily recounts these symptoms to
you, you notice that she has a runny nose and a slight
hoarseness in her voice but doesn't sound congested.
The Assignment
1. Use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an
episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study.
2. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic
tests that would be appropriate for each case.
3. List five different possible conditions for the patient's
differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.
4. You are required to include at least five evidence-based peer-
reviewed journal articles or evidenced based guidelines which
relates to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials
diagnoses.
5. Be sure to use correct APA 7th edition formatting.
Eyes,
Ears, Nose, and Throat
Most ear, nose, and throat conditions that arise in non
-
critical care settings are minor in nature.
However, subtle symptoms can sometimes escalate into life
-
threatening conditions
that require
prompt assessment and treatment.

must be able to identify the small
differences between life
-
threatening conditions and benign ones. For instance, if a
patient with a sore
throat an
d a runny nose also has inflamed lymph nodes, the inflammation
is probably due to the
pathogen causing the sore throat rather than a case of throat
cancer. With this knowledge and a
sufficient patient health history, a nurse would not need to
escalate the
assessment to a biopsy or an
MRI of the lymph nodes but would probably perform a simple
strep test.
abnormal findings from patients in a
clinical setting. You determine what history should be coll
ected from the patients, what physical
exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted, and formulate a
differential diagnosis with several
possible conditions.
To Prepare
·
Y
ou will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case
Study Assignment.

(See below the
case study)
·
Also, your Case Study Assignment should be in the
Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format
rather than the traditional narrative style forma
t.
(see
exemplar
as a guide and t
he
template
to
use
)
·
Regarding
the case
study,
you were assigned:
·
Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the
patient.
·

Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be
appropriate to gather more
information about the patient's condition. How would the results
be used to make a
diagnosis?
·
Identify at least five
possible conditions that may be considered in a diffe
rential diagnosis
for the patient.
CASE STUDY 2: Focused Thro
at Exam
Lily is a 20
-
year
-
old student at the local community college. When some of her
friends and
classmates told her about an outbreak of flu
-
like symptoms sweeping her campus during the past 2
weeks, Lily figured she shouldn't take her 3
-
day sore throat
lightly. Your clinic has treated a few cases
similar to Lily's. All the patients reported decreased appetite,
headaches, and pain with swallowing.

As Lily recounts these symptoms to you, you notice that she has
a runny nose and a slight
hoarseness in her
voice but doesn't sound congested.
The Assignment
1.
Use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an
episodic/focused note about the
patient in the case study
.
2.
Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests
that would be appropriate for
each case.
3.
List five different possible conditions for the patient's
differential diagnosis and justify why you
selected each.
Eyes,
Ears, Nose, and Throat
Most ear, nose, and throat conditions that arise in non-critical
care settings are minor in nature.
However, subtle symptoms can sometimes escalate into life-

threatening conditions that require
prompt assessment and treatment.
must be able to identify the small
differences between life-threatening conditions and benign
ones. For instance, if a patient with a sore
throat and a runny nose also has inflamed lymph nodes, the
inflammation is probably due to the
pathogen causing the sore throat rather than a case of throat
cancer. With this knowledge and a
sufficient patient health history, a nurse would not need to
escalate the assessment to a biopsy or an
MRI of the lymph nodes but would probably perform a simple
strep test.
abnormal findings from patients in a
clinical setting. You determine what history should be collected
from the patients, what physical
exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted, and formulate a
differential diagnosis with several
possible conditions.
To Prepare
Study Assignment. (See below the
case study)
Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format
rather than the traditional narrative style format. (see exemplar
as a guide and the template to
use)
patient.
diagnostic tests would be

appropriate to gather more
information about the patient's condition. How would the results
be used to make a
diagnosis?
considered in a differential diagnosis
for the patient.
CASE STUDY 2: Focused Throat Exam
Lily is a 20-year-old student at the local community college.
When some of her friends and
classmates told her about an outbreak of flu-like symptoms
sweeping her campus during the past 2
weeks, Lily figured she shouldn't take her 3-day sore throat
lightly. Your clinic has treated a few cases
similar to Lily's. All the patients reported decreased appetite,
headaches, and pain with swallowing.
As Lily recounts these symptoms to you, you notice that she has
a runny nose and a slight
hoarseness in her voice but doesn't sound congested.
The Assignment
1. Use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an
episodic/focused note about the
patient in the case study.
2. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic
tests that would be appropriate for
each case.
3. List five different possible conditions for the patient's
differential diagnosis and justify why you
selected each.

Form & Content Julie Mehretus MuralDue Sunday by 1159p

Form & Content Julie Mehretus MuralDue Sunday by 1159p

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Form & Content Julie Mehretus MuralDue Sunday by 1159p

Similar to Form & Content Julie Mehretus MuralDue Sunday by 1159p (20)

More from ShainaBoling829

More from ShainaBoling829 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Form & Content Julie Mehretus MuralDue Sunday by 1159p