Join the founder and president of TalentMap, as he looks to answer your questions related to the challenges associated with employee engagement in Nonprofit organizations. We explore topics such as: What engagement is and how it differs for Nonprofits; the drivers of employee engagement in Nonprofits, and finally, best case practices and recommendations to improve engagement drivers. To register for a live Webinar,please visit us at TalentMap.com
Study at Brigham Young University on employee engagement best practices.
Conclusions, a significant portion reported that senior executives would clearly buy into employee engagement initiatives if provided with an executive summary of the findings — including potential action items that would directly impact the bottom line.
The keys here?
Clear findings with clear recommendations for action.
We better define it:
One thing I want to point out is the difference between job satisfaction and engagement.
They are not the same. Let me repeat that “they are not the same” in fact they are not even close.
Satisfied employee are content, gratified even satiated but engage employee are focused, have a sense of urgency and intensity, are measurably more enthusitic, persistent and adaptable, this is where we want our employee to be
Satisfied employee focus on what they get while engaged employees focus what they can give.
Furthermore how we measure engagement is different.
For the next Portion of my presentation I going talk about how to measure engagement concisely and more important how to ensure action is taken from your engagement survey & and give you some tips tactics to take away.
Links - Chapter 4
Cost of keeping us employed – every year at risk - 2011 study completed by team of social sciences completed at University of Canberra in Australia having a job that we hate is as bad for our health sometime worse than not having a job at all – depression of those at work same or greater than those who are unemployed. People at work that care for us then our stress levels decrease.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2237371/Hating-job-bad-health-unemployed-researchers-warn.html
Another study at University College of London 2011 people who not recognized at work have more heart disease – lack of control. Darrel O’Connor –professor of health phycology at University of Leeds Employees who put in a lot of effort in and are not recognized. Increases stress
Saved in marketing/collateral dev/articles/stress
Gallup Poll 2013 state of the American work place when boss ignored us we disengage 40% , if boss criticise us 22% disengage, recognize one of our strengths 1% disengage.
http://www.gallup.com/strategicconsulting/163007/state-american-workplace.aspx
Whitehall study – higher we climb ladder more stress we feel, executive stress syndrome , Place in corporate ladder and stress , degree of control employees have throughout the day. Less control more stress.
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/whitehallII/history
2012 study at Harvard and Stanford stress level at Harvard MBA program, hormone levels at different levels, leaders had lower levels, the more Sr. you might expect to live longer than lower level employees, not a small discrepancy. Sense of control of our work, those empowered have less stress.
http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=42987
Human Resources consultant Mercer LLC 4th quarter 2010 and first quarter 2011 1 in 3 employees considered leaving their job up 23% from 5 years prior. Less than 1.5 employees voluntarily left. People feel stuck.
http://www.mercer.com/press-releases/1418665
A study by 2 researchers at graduate school of social work Boston College child’s sense of well being effected by parents that enjoy their work
http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/centers/cwf/research/publications/pdf/Culture_%26_WorkLife_Balance_Scan.pdf
http://workplaceflexibility.bc.edu/need/need_employees
Recent Study of non profit leaders and manager identified HR and people management and one of the most depleted part of their job
They get the Vision – to attract but they don’t have the work environment to sustain and build
No. of organizations/projects: 46
No. of respondents: 10362
Average Size 100 employees
Min Engagement Score: 45%
Max Engagement Score: 95%
Average Engagement Score: 74 %
Top Quartile:80%
Top Decile: 91%
Response Rate: 83%
Engagement % Change from previous BM: +3%
Audacious: Your vision represents a dream that’s beyond what you think is possible. It represents the mountaintop your company is striving to reach. Visioning takes you out beyond your present reality.
Capitalizes on core competencies: Your vision builds on your company’s core competencies. It builds on what you’ve already established: company history, customer base, strengths, and unique capabilities, resources, and assets.
Futurecasting: Your vision provides a picture of what your business looks like in the future.
Inspiring: Your vision engages language that inspires. It creates a vivid image in people’s heads that provokes emotion and excitement. It creates enthusiasm and poses a challenge.
Motivating: Your vision clarifies the direction in which your organization needs to move and keeps everyone pushing forward to reach it.
Purpose-driven: Your vision gives employees a larger sense of purpose, so they see themselves as building a cathedral instead of laying stones.