Further explanation on 'Communication Process' with examples.

1. S A M I A H A S S A N
Communication
Part 2

2. Continue
The clarity of the message that had been communicated
depends on many things among them:
1. The medium
2. The surroundings (Can be noise, political aspects,
emotional, religion, etc.)
3. The Sender
4. & also the receiver

3. Examples
The examples I’ll be using shouldn’t be interpreted in
any political manner, but am using them merely for
educational purposes.
I’ll be using 2 examples to explain the communication
process, the first example is the ‘Turkish Coup’, &
second is ‘Execution of Former Iraqi President
Saddam Hussein’.
Remember our model(Sender, message, medium,
channel/medium & the feedback)

4. ‘Turkish Coup’
The ‘Turkish Coup’ occurred in July 15, 2016.
1. Sender: ‘Army Officers’ along others
2. Message: That they took over the country
3. Medium: TRT Channel
4. Receiver: Turkish Citizens
5. Feedback: Counter message from Turkish
president ‘Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’ to the citizens to
fight the military attempt and stand up for their
country, citizens revolted against the coup.

5. ‘Execution of Former Iraqi President
Saddam Hussein’.
Occurred on December 30, 2006.
1. Sender: Iraqi Government/Guards
2. Message: ‘Hanging of former Iraqi President’
accused of many crimes
3. Medium: Iraqi TV/Internet via ‘Mobile Phone’
4. Receiver: Global/Worldwide Audience
5. Feedback: Varied

6. Expected Outcomes of Communication Messages
When communication messages are transmitted there’s an
expected outcome, failure and success depends on many
aspects (Sender, channel, surroundings, etc.)
If we take the last example of ‘Saddam Hussein’ execution,
if what was intended with the airing of video; was to
document the fate that awaits those who oppress their
people or an end of an era, one will realize that didn’t
happen, many people sympathized with the death, &
‘Saddam Hussein’ had become a ‘Martyrdom’ symbol for
many.