The Financial Strategic Review of a Public Company project was a quarter long assignment in which my group members and I were responsible to value a US-based mid-cap public company. Along with performing the valuation my team was responsible for:
1) Evaluating the risk profile
2) Describing investor returns
3) Analyzing the capital structure
4) Examining the dividend policyThe Financial Strategic Review of a Public Company project was a quarter long assignment in which my group members and I were responsible to value a US-based mid-cap public company. Along with performing the valuation my team was responsible for:
1) Evaluating the risk profile
2) Describing investor returns
3) Analyzing the capital structure
4) Examining the dividend policy
3. Domino’s Separates Ownership
and Management
❖ According to the employee agreement between Domino's and the Executives
the Executive will NOT directly or indirectly, own, manage, operate, control or
participate in any manner in the ownership, management, and operation.
Source: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
4. Qualified and Experienced Board of Directors
David A Brandon Richard E Allison C Andrew Ballard Andrew Balson Corie S Barry
Diana F Cantor Richard L Federico James A Goldman Patricia A Lopez
Source: Domino’s Board of Directors (Domino’s Website)
5. Domino’s Practices Independency
❖ Board of Directors (subject to NYSE) believe that a majority of the board
should be independent
❖ Board of Directors determine annually whether or not each director is
independent by assessing each directors material relationship with Domino’s
❖ All future non-employee directors will be independent
Source: Domino’s Website
6. Standards Defining Domino’s Independency
❖ Does not/has not received more than $120,000 direct compensation from
Domino’s other than director and committee fees in last three years
❖ Has not been employed by Domino’s in previous three years and has no
immediate family employed at Domino’s
❖ Has not been affiliated with or employed in a professional capacity by
present/former auditor of Domino’s
❖ Is not and previously have not been employed by executive officer of a company
for which Domino’s serves on compensation committee
❖ Is not an executive officer, or an employee/no immediate family who is an
executive officer, of another company that accounts for greater than 1,000,000 or
2% of Domino’s consolidated gross revenue
Source: Domino's Pizza Website
7. Domino’s has High Standards
for Management
❖ Domino's top management team is experienced, qualified, and has a strong
commitment to personal and professional integrity
❖ The top management are experts in their respective fields
❖ Example
➢ Lisa Price, the Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
■ Served as senior vice president of human resources at Nordstrom
■ Lead human resources teams for key corporate functions including technology, data
science, finance, credit, strategy, legal, supply chain and store operations
■ 15 years experience at Starbucks supporting the company’s global expansion in a
variety of human resources roles
Source: Domino’s Website and Simply Wall
8. Richard E. Allison Tom Curtis Joseph H. Jordan Jeffrey Lawrence
Kevin S. Morris Lisa Price Russell Weiner Tim McIntyre
CEO Executive VP,
Corporate
Operations
Executive
VP,
International
Executive VP,
Chief Financial
Officer
Corporate
Secretary
COO, President of
the Americas
Executive VP,
Communication,
Legislative Affairs
Investor Relations
Source: Domino’s Website
9. Management Age and Tenure
❖ DPZ's management team is
considered experienced since it has
a 4 years average tenure
Board Age and Tenure
❖ DPZ's Board is considered
experienced since it has about 9
years average tenure
Long-tenured directors can be beneficial because of their deep
knowledge of the company acquired through service, the
continuity and stability they offer
Source: Simply Wall Street
Domino’s Board and Management has High
Experience and Tenure Averages
10. Corporate Governance Policies Assure
Compensation and Performance Standards
The board is single class with one year terms and no term limits
Board compensation:
❖ A Director should own shares, or hold vested shares, having a value of at least five
times the annual retainer amount
Performance:
❖ All board members must attend and actively participate in all scheduled meetings.
There will be a minimum of one meeting per year. Directors are also expected to
participate in education programs and interact with Institutional Investors, Press,
Customers, and Shareholders
❖ The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees
annual self evaluations of board members and committees
Source: Domino’s Website
12. Domino’s has a Variety of Investors
❖ Mutual fund holders - 54.93%
❖ Other institutional - 50.53%
❖ Individual stakeholders - 47.41%
❖ Institutional investors hold 105.46% of the outstanding shares
❖ Extremely high interest compared to other companies in Restaurants industry
➢ In the quarter of June 2019, investors purchased $2.9 million shares
Source: Yahoo Finance
13. Domino’s Does NOT List in Foreign Markets
❖ Domino’s Inc. only has shares outstanding in the New York
Stock Exchange
Source: Domino’s Website- Investor’s
14. Large Institutional Ownership of DPZ
❖ The high percentage of shares are held
by institutions like
➢ BLACKROCK INC.
➢ CAPITAL WORLD INVESTORS
➢ VANGUARD GROUP INC.
Source: Money CNN
15. DPZ Shareholders Have not Been Meaningfully
Diluted
❖ Shareholders have not been meaningfully diluted in the past year
➢ More dilution = Existing shareholder value decreasing
Source: Simply Wall Street - DPZ
16. Insider Trading has Increased in the Past 3
Months
❖ Independent Director, James Goldman, sold US $294k worth of shares at a price
of US $247 per share. Being an insider, he saw fit to sell at around the current
price of US $243
Source: Simply Wall Street - DPZ
17. Market Communication Favors “Buying”
As of December 2019, Domino’s has 28 analysts that cover the firm.
Recommendation:
❖ In December 2019, there were 28 ratings.
➢ Strong Buy (8), Buy (6), Hold (13), Underperform (1)
❖ The average recommendation rating is 2.2.
Analyst Price Targets:
❖ Average: $297.91, High: $337.00, Low: $208.00
Source: Yahoo Finance
19. Earning Per Share has Increased Every Year
❖ EPS 2019: $9.07
❖ EPS 2018: $8.35
❖ EPS 2017: $5.83
❖ EPS 2016: $4.30
❖ EPS 2015: $3.47
Source: YCharts
20. High Financial Leverage but Less Than Industry
Average
❖ Average financial leverage: -1.180
Source: YCharts
21. Domino’s Cost of Debt is in the 60th Percentile
❖ Cost of Debt : 3.3%
Source: Finbox
22. Domino’s Company Rating is Bottom Tier
Investment Grade
❖ Domino’s rating: BBB+
Source: SPGlobal
23. Domino’s has Negative Stockholder Equity
❖ Implication of Negative Stockholders Equity
➢ Increased interest rates by banks
➢ Decrease in corporate valuations and credit ratings
➢ Unable to pay dividends to shareholders
➢ Fall in company stock price
Source: Wall Street Mojo
24. Gross Debt to Equity Ratio Indicates High Debt
❖ Total Liabilities (in thousands): $3,674,676
❖ Total Stockholders Equity (in thousands): $-2,935,649
❖ Debt to Equity ratio = total liabilities/total stockholders equity
➢ 3,947,306/-2,935,649 = -1.3
❖ 101.35% lower than Consumer
Cyclical sector
❖ 101.31% lower than Restaurants
industry
Source: Simply Wall Street - DPZ
25. Domino’s Beta Needs to be Levered Due to Great
Amount of Debt
❖ Bottom - up beta
Source: Simply Wall Street - DPZ
26. High Cost of Equity Representing High Risk
❖ Cost of Equity = Risk Free Rate + ( Levered Beta * Equity Risk Premium)
= 1.74% + (1.115 * 5.44%)
= 7.81%
Source: Simply Wall Street - DPZ
27. 4 out of 5 Risk Checks “PASS”
4
Source: Simply Wall Street - DPZ
28. WACC Indicates Risk
❖ Range of WACC: 5.8% - 7.0%
❖ Domino’s WACC as of 2/2/2020: 5.93%
➢ Return is negative
➢ Company is shedding value
Source: GuruFocus
30. Negative ROE
Value of Liabilities > Value of Assets
❖ Return on Equity: -12.92%
❖ Calculation:
➢ Net Income / Shareholder's Equity
➢ $0.38B / -$2.94B=-12.92%
Source: Domino's Pizza Inc Debt to Equity Ratio 2006-2019 | DPZ - Macrotrends
35. Debt and Equity Financing are Used
The company uses both
1. Debt Financing
2. Equity financing
Source: Domino’s Balance Sheet - 2019
36. DPZ Uses Debt to its Advantage
❖ Domino’s has used debt financing to undergo major recapitalization in 1998,
2007, 2012, and 2019
Source: Yahoo Finance - Statistics
❖ The company often uses debt financing and has a current total debt of:
3.68B (mrq)
37. DPZ Uses Debt to its Advantage Pt. 2
Source: January 2020 Investor Presentation -
38. Growth in Sales Allows Domino’s to Pay its
High Debt
Source: Does Domino’s Have a Debt Problem?
39. Dividend Policy
Section VI
❖ Dividend Level
❖ Dividend Form
❖ Dividend Focus
❖ Dividend Comparison
❖ Dividend Policy
43. Declining but Healthy Payout Ratio Over the Past
5 Years
Source: YCharts
❖ Payout ratio = dividends per share/ earnings per share
➢ = .65/2.05 = 32% (2019 third quarter)
45. 3 Forms in Which DPZ Pays Dividends
1. Cash Dividends
2. Special Dividends
3. Share Buyback
Source: DPZ Quarterly Cash Flow Statement 2019
46. Stock Price Saw no Reduction on Ex-Dividend Date
The company’s Board of Directors
declared a $0.65 per share quarterly
dividend
❖ Declaration Date: 10/04/2019
❖ Ex - Dividend Date: 12/12/19
❖ Payment Date: 12/27/19
The stock price did not go down on the ex-
dividend date. It could be because:
❖ The market was particularly optimistic about
the stock leading up to the ex-dividend date
❖ The dividend was so small, the reduction went
unnoticed
Source: DPZ Quarterly Cash Flow Statement 2019 and Dividends.com
47. Special Dividends in 2007 and 2012
March 16, 2012
❖ Special dividend = $3.00 per share
April 17, 2007
❖ Special dividend = $13.50 per share
➢ Was funded by a $1.85 billion new borrowing program at the time.
Source: YCharts
48. Significant Share Buyback
From the investor perspective:
❖ When there are fewer shares to go around, that can trigger a rise in prices
❖ Additionally, the shareholder’s overall ownership stake in the company
increases
Source: YCharts
49. Repurchasing Stock to Increase EPS
❖ On October 4, 2019, Domino’s Board of Directors authorized a new share
repurchase program to repurchase up to $1.0 billion of the company’s
common stock…….WHY?
❖ Reducing the total number of shares
➢ Often boosts earnings per share (EPS) of a company
➢ Inflate ROA and ROE
Source: Domino’s Investor Data at a Glance Presentation
51. Dividend Payments are Increasing
❖ Total dividend payments in the last 5 years = $9.4
❖ Average Dividends Per Share Growth Rate
➢ 1 year growth rate (TTM) = 18.18%
➢ 5 year growth rate (CAGR) = 21.06%
Year Dividends
2015 1.24
2016 1.52
2017 1.84
2018 2.2
2019 2.6
Source: Yahoo and Seeking Alpha
52. Dividend is Covered by Both Profit and Cash
Flow
❖ Domino’s Pizza paid out a comfortable 27% of its profit last year
❖ Its dividend payments took up just 28% of the free cash flow it generated,
which is a good payout ratio, meaning the company generated enough cash
to afford its dividend
Source: Simply Wall Street
54. Inferior Dividend Yield Compared to Industry
❖ Domino’s Pizza dividend yield % is ranked lower than 72% of 199 companies
in the restaurant industry
Source: GuruFocus
55. Superior Payout Ratio Compared to Industry
❖ Payout Ratio Comparison
❖ Domino’s Pizza payout ratio is ranked higher than 73%
of the 162 companies in the restaurant industry
Source: GuruFocus
58. ROIC > WACC
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
WACC 8.62 5.42 3.46 2.49 6.16
ROIC 77.62% 76.27% 58.85% 60.63% 64.18%
Source: Wall Street Journal
❖ Based on past years’ data we can trust the managers with the
cash as ROIC > WACC
59. DPZ Dividend Policy
Domino’s pays out
too little dividends
FCFE>Dividends
We trust the managers
with the cash based on
past project choice
ROIC > WACC
Firm has history of
good project choice
and good projects in
the future
Give managers the
flexibility to keep cash
and set dividends
Source: Mgmt 109 - Professor Richey’s slides
61. 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity Model
❖ Terminal Value = FCF2029 × (1 + g) ÷ (Discount Rate – g)
= $855.417 x (1 + 1.74%) ÷ (7.81% - 1.74% ) = $14,345.25
❖ Present Value of Terminal Value = Terminal Value ÷ (1 + r)10
$14,565 ÷ (1 + 7.81%)10 = $6,764.65M
❖ Total Equity Value = Present value of next 10 years cash flows + Terminal
Value = $4,546 + $6,765 = $11,310.65
Source: Simply Wall Street - DPZ
62. Intrinsic Value < Market Value
❖ Equity Value per Share (USD)
= Total Value / Shares Outstanding
= $11,311 / 41 = $276.54
❖ Current discount:
Discount to share price of $291.60 = -1 x ($291.60 - $276.54) / $276.54
= -5.4%
Source: Simply Wall Street - DPZ
63. DPZ is 5.4% Overvalued
Source: Simply Wall Street - DPZ
64. DCF and Relative Value are Consistent -
DPZ is Overvalued
Domino’s P/E ratio = NYSE:DPZ Share Price ÷ EPS (both in USD)
291.6 ÷ 9.35 = 31.18x
Source: Simply Wall Street - DPZ
66. DPZ is Overvalued
❖ A stock may become overvalued in one of two ways.
➢ First, a stock may be overvalued due to a surge in demand driven primarily by investor
perceptions. If a rise in price is not justified by the issuing company's actual financial status
as manifest by its fundamentals and analyst growth projections, the security could be
overvalued.
➢ The second way by which a stock may become overvalued is if its fundamentals (i.e. revenue,
earnings, growth projections, balance sheet, etc.) decline while its market price remains
constant. If the security was already fairly valued and does drop in price when the
fundamentals deteriorate, then the security is likely valued adequately.
Source: Simply Wall Street - DPZ
Domino’s exercises separation between ownership and management. A Domino’s executive can not, directly or indirectly, own, manage, operate, control or participate in any manner in the ownership, management, and operation of any business, venture or activity
These are the current board of directors (of Domino’s Pizza)
The board of directors believe that a majority of the board should be independent. They determine annually whether or not each director is independent but for all future non-employee directors they will be independent.
Some of the stds that define Dominos independency are that,
they haven’t received more than 120,000 compensation or , haven’t been employed by dominos or have family that have been employed in the last three years ,
Domino's top management team is experienced, qualified, and has a strong commitment to personal and professional integrity
These are the people who hold the most senior positions in the company
longer average board tenure is positively related to contemporaneous and future firm market values. However, this relationship reverses at a certain point, roughly after 8-9 years of average board tenure. Beyond this ‘benchmark’ for the average board tenure there is deterioration in valuation, and this deterioration is significantly faster for growing firms.”
long-tenured directors can be beneficial because of their deep knowledge of the company acquired through service, the continuity and stability they offer, and their grasp of the historical perspectives that can inform current company strategy.
The board is a single class ranging from 3 to 10 members that serve one year terms with no term limits. The board is compensated via company stocks. Directors receive significant compensation in the form of stock or stock-based instruments in order to align their interests with those of stockholders. Board performance is measured annually and is based on active participation and company involvement.
The average investors are institutional fund holders and individual stakeholders. Institutional investors hold a majority ownership of DPZ through the 105.46% of the outstanding shares that they control. Last year, during the quarter ended June 2019, these large investors purchased a net $2.9 million shares.
Domino’s Inc does not have any listings in foreign markets. Although they are a franchise and the stores exist on an international scale, the company only has shares outstanding in the New York Stock Exchange.
Since there is a large institutional ownership of dominos’ stocks they are favorably looked upon as large entities frequently employ a team of analysts to perform detailed and expensive financial research before the group purchases a large block of the company’s stock.
As for further ownership breakdown, shares have not been meaningfully diluted in the past year. This is actually a good indicator since many existing shareholders don't view dilution in a very good light. More dilution implies that existing shareholder value is decreasing. After all, by adding more shares into the pool, their ownership of the company is being cut down. That may lead shareholders to believe their value in the company is decreasing.
Although insider selling is looked down upon, it can reflect the potential future value of the company’s stock, and how they’re doing financially. The lower the sale price, the more it concerns us as it shows the insider’s perception as to how the company will perform. This specific sale took place at around the current price, so it isn’t a major concern, though it’s hardly a good sign. A good predictor of Domino’s future earnings would be if an insiders start buying more shares of the company.
The average recommendation rating for DPZ was 2.2, which equates to being between “buy” and “hold”, but closer to buy. The rating is indicative of the predictive success of the company and the value of the stock for potential stockholders.
From 2015 to 2019 the EPS has increased every year and has changed from 3.47 to 9.07. The higher the earnings per share of a company, shows that it is profiting
In general, company leadership and investors are comfortable with a certain level of debt and leverage due to the potentially higher return on equity it generates. Most typically, a negative leverage ratio refers to the negative return on equity that results from the higher interest on debt than the investment return.
Do not record this:
A ratio less than one means a company has financed itself with more common equity than financial debt. With all things being equal, a ratio less than one is more favorable. On average, Domino’s has had an annual leverage ratio of -1.180. As of September 2019, the third quarter displayed a 3.18% change in total liabilities.
The cost of debt can give investors an idea of the company’s risk level compared to others. Riskier companies generally have a higher cost of debt.. September 2019 third quarter (debt coverage)
Domino’s has a rating of BBB+ which means that it is a medium credit quality rating and is considered the bottom tier of investment grade ratings. Companies with these ratings are considered “speculative grade” and are more vulnerable to changing economic conditions than the. However, a BBB+ rating largely demonstrates the ability to meet their debt payment obligations. (Rating as of 2019 according to S&P Global Ratings' credit rating )
Negative equity arises when the total liabilities of the company are more than value of its total assets during a particular point of time and the reasons for such negative balance includes accumulated losses, large dividend payments, large borrowing for covering accumulated losses etc. Some implications of Dominos negative SE are:
Decrease in orders as the customers fear for the company honoring the contract
Reduction in credit period offered by creditors or they may deny credit sales.
Difficulty in getting further funds either through loans or equity
Reasons for Dominos’ negative gross debt to equity ratio could be:
Accumulated losses over several periods or years
Large dividend payments that either exhausted retained earnings or exceeded shareholders' equity would show a negative balance
Borrowing money to cover accumulated losses instead of issuing more shares through equity funding could lead to negative shareholders' equity.
Using industry averages for the beta is more stable for projection than using a company’s beta from the past 5 years. Also we levered the beta to incorporate the high level of risk from Dominos’ great amount of debt. Dominos currently has a Levered Beta of 1.115
The beta was levered to represent debt which we know creates some risk for the company. Dominos cost of equity is 7.81%
Risk checks show that Domino’s is forecasted to be profitable and grow, pay its interest payments, and exceed industry earning standards. The only place in which the company fails is that their standing debts are not well covered by their operating cash flow.
If the company's return is less than its weighted average cost of capital, the company is shedding value, indicating that it's an unfavorable investment.The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is a calculation of a firm's cost of capital in which each category of capital is proportionately weighted. Domino’s WACC ranges between 5.8 and 7.0 but as of February 2nd it is 5.93, meaning the company must pay its investors an average of just over 5 cents in return for every $1 in extra funding.
The return on equity is used as a measure of the profitability of a business in relation to the equity. An ROE of -12.92% shows that the total liabilities of the company are more than the value of its total assets, which is a negative sign for Dominos.
By discounting the cash flows of the upcoming 5 years at the calculated cost of equity from the previous slide, we determine that the present value of the next 5 year cash flows is $4558M. From the forecasted cash flows, we can see that the company will experience positive growth.
Domino’s Pizza has a current ratio of 1.44 which generally indicates good short term financial strength. Profit margins vary by industry, but generally a 10% net profit margin is considered average. Domino’s ROA is higher than most companies in the restaurant industry which indicates profitability and efficiency.Increasing revenue per share over time is a good sign, because it means each share now has claim to more revenues. The P/E ratio of 31.10 is over the average S&P value of 25, which could indicate that the stock is overvalued.
TSR is expressed as a percentage, and is readily comparable with industry benchmarks or companies in the same sector. However, it reflects the past overall return to shareholders without consideration of future returns. It measures how the market evaluates the overall performance of a company over a specific time period; it does not take into consideration the cost of capital and cannot compare investments over different time periods.
Domino’s uses both debt and equity financing.
The company has a lower debt ratio than the industry average and is using it in a optimal way to pay dividends, recapitalization, and buy back shares
Dominos uses debt to its advantage. The latest repapitalization in 2019 increased debt to 4.1 billion dollars. The company plans to use the proceeds to pay transaction fees and for general corporate purposes, including distributions to holders of the Company's common stock, other equivalent payments and stock repurchases.
Dominos does not have debt ratio which is significantly greater than the other competitors within its sector. Note, Although it has a high debt to assets ratio, the company still generates enough earnings to cover interest expenses. Growth in sales has always allowed for domino’s to pay down its debts quickly.
Domino’s Pizza’s dividend yield has changed over the past 5 years. In January 2016, Domino’s experienced a maximum dividend yield of 1.19%. In August 2018, they experienced a minimum yield of 0.67%. On average (and presently) Domino’s Pizza has a dividend yield of 0.91 and 0.92%. Higher yielding dividend stocks provide more income, but higher yield often comes with greater risk. In terms of income and risk for investors, high yielding dividend stocks can increase income for investors, but also add risk. A stock’s dividend yield can change over time either in response to market fluctuations or as a result of dividend increases or decreases by the issuing company.
A payout of 0-35% is considered a good payout. Therefore, Domino’s Pizza has had a good payout ratio consistently the past five years. Payout ratios in this range are generally considered “value” stocks. A range of 35-55% is considered a healthy and appropriate ratio from an investors point of view and is typically considered a well established company and a leader in its industry. In Dec. 2015, Domino’s experienced this healthy range and had its highest payout ratio of 41.67%. In the past five years, Domino’s has not had a payout ratio in the high range of 55%-75%. However, investors should always prefer healthy payout ratios over high payout ratios.
the market is particularly optimistic about the stock leading up to the ex-dividend date, the price increase this creates may be larger than the actual dividend amount, resulting in a net increase despite the automatic reduction. If the dividend is small, the reduction may even go unnoticed due to the back and forth of normal trading.
Special dividends are usually declared after exceptionally strong company earnings results as a way to distribute the profits directly to shareholders. Domino’s management issued these special dividends as they believed it would allow shareholders to receive a significant distribution without the need to surrender any shares of Domino’s Pizza
By reducing the number of outstanding shares, management can increase share value in the short term without binding the company to a dividend payment increase.
A slowdown in bottom-line growth can thus be camouflaged as fewer shares are available per year, giving net income fewer shares to be divided over -- thereby increasing the EPS.
growing dividends are a sign of a healthy stock, one that is committed to its shareholders, and may also be an indication of more dividend raises to come.
Domino’s dividends seem to be stable as they took up only 28% of the Free cash Flow generated
Compared to similar companies in the restaurant industry, Domino’s Pizza dividend yield is lower than most companies. What this means is that Domino’s yields are well below market and industry averages. If a stock has a low dividend yield, this implies that the stock’s market price is considerably higher than the dividend payments a shareholder gets from owning the stock. This may indicate an overvalued stock or larger dividends in the future.
Compared to similar companies in the restaurant industry, Domino’s Pizza payout ratio is higher than 73% of companies. This means that 27% of Domino’s earnings are paid to shareholders and 73% is retained by Domino’s. This means that Domino’s dividend payments are well covered by earnings.
FCFE has consistently been greater than dividend. This indicates that Dominos has the ability to pay out more dividends
Since return on invested capital is greater than the weighted average cost of capital, The company has been choosing good projects and also the forecasted revenues are positive indicating the company has good projects in the future as well
Domino’s pays out too little dividends since Free cash flow to equity >Dividends. We trust the managers with the cash based on past project choice. As Return on Invested Capital > weighted average cost of capital. This shows that the Firm has history of good project choice and good projects in the future and Gives managers the flexibility to keep cash and set dividends
We use the Discounted Cash Flow Model to vaule Dominos as this model is easy to use when the future cash benefits are known or can be at least reasonably forecasted.
The 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity model is designed to value the equity in a firm with two stages of growth, an initial period of higher growth, and a subsequent period of stable growth. The model tells us the intrinsic value of the company is $276 which is less than the market value.
Since the market value of Dominos is greater than the intrisic value we conclude that Dominos is overvalued.
A relative valuation model is a business valuation method that compares a firm's value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Since Dominos has a higer P/E ratio compared to competitors and the industry, it is clearly overvalued,
Domino’s Pizza trades on a P/E ratio of 31.2, which is above its market average of 18.39. While the company does use modest debt, its recent earnings growth is very good. So on this analysis it seems reasonable that its P/E ratio is above average.
Dominos stock may have become overvalued in one of two ways.
a surge in demand driven primarily by investor perceptions. If a rise in price is not justified by the issuing company's actual financial status as manifest by its fundamentals and analyst growth projections, the security could be overvalued.
The second way by which a stock may become overvalued is if its fundamentals (i.e. revenue, earnings, growth projections, balance sheet, etc.) decline while its market price remains constant.