Designing slides without using smart art, Designing slides keeping in mind colour schemes, Best use of space provided in an each slide, Presenting graphs with proper labelling and description, While designing slide keeping in mind alignment of all the figures.

1. Project progress update by function
End of phase II activities
End of phase III activities
PurchasingSales&M.WarrantyLogisticsSparesOthers
Contract Analysis
Long Steel Contract
China Sourcing
Dealers Incentive
Cons. Discount
Incentive Process
Analysis of warranty payment & terms
Claiming back payment to suppliers
Warranty administration process
Review inbound logistics
Review outbound logistics
Review aftersales logistics
Future growth project
Review spare parts pricing
Review parts availability
Fixed cost/break even analysis
Product portfolio review
October November
01 08 15 22 29 05 12 19 26Completion Stage
To be confirmed by ETB
To be discussed
80%
80%
80%
80%
80%
85%
95%
90%
95%
20%
20%
20%
30%
30%
30%

2. Project phase and initial time line
Phase 1 & 2 Activities
Project start date: July26
Plant visit: Aug 2-3, Aug
17-19, Sept 21-23 Oct 6-7
Interview/phone calls
conducted with IT, HR ,
Sales & Marketing,
Product Development,
Procurement, Aftersales,
Warranty and out-bound
logistics.
Phases 1 and 2 got
delayed significantly due
to slow data delivery in
all functions (except Sales
& Marketing) and led to
adjustment of overall
project plan and timeline
Scope of product
portfolio analysis to be
discussed.
Identify performance
gaps
Perform root-cause
analysis
Design improvement
initiatives
ObjectivesKeyactivitiesDeliverables
c c
Project kick-off
Business model
review
Purchasing
 Production, R&D
 Distribution/ Sales &
Marketing (S&M)
 Employee costs etc
Benchmarking
Product portfolio
analysis
Current state
summary
Industry best
practices assessment
Performance gaps
Root-cause analysis
of performance gaps
Benchmarks/ peer
comparisons
Improvement
initiatives
Business cases
Implementation
roadmap
Current state root-
cause analysis of
performance gaps
Peer benchmarking
and primary research
Design improvement
initiatives
Develop business
cases
Develop overall
initiatives roadmap
based on priorities,
dependencies and
estimated value
realization
Situation Scan Deep Dive Roadmap Design
2-3 weeks 8-9 weeks 2-3 weeks

3. Identification of components that use long steel as a raw
material
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
2010 2011 2012
Estimated annual consumption of long steel by ETB
Bharat Forge kalyani
Mahindra Forge Applied
Dawn EEC
GNA Other Small Supplier
Suppliers who may be willing to procure
under the central contract
ETB’s indirect long-steel
consumption is estimated to
double by 2012
Large component manufacturers
like Bharat Forge, Kalyani Group
and Mahindra Forge may not be
willing to purchase long steel under
the central contract
The large component
manufacturers are backward
integrated
Development of alternate vendors
to reduce dependence on the
larger ones should continue

4. All the three slide have been
referred from Google. It has been
used only for the purpose of
enhancing designing skills.