Evaluation and monitoring of a project

1. Evaluation and monitoring of
the meetings

2. Summary of the Evaluations and monitoring of the meetings
Summary of the evaluations of our LTT meetings
We used Google forms to evaluate our meetings (LTT), both with students and teachers involved.
The meeting evaluation for each meeting (LTT) was the same form:
An initial general GForm,delivered among teachers/pupils/families involved in the project, will take a picture of the initial situation,referring firstly to
the chosen horizontal priorities/topics & secondly to the following parameters:
-Europeanization level
-Civic engagement & responsible citizenship
-Innovative practices in a digital era
-Level of inclusion
-Open education & active methods use
-School curricula composition
-Positive school climate
-Social cohesion
-Intercultural/intergenerational approach
-LLL attitudes
We used the same Gform pre- and post the project.
Google Forms

3. The teachers’ and principal evaluation of the three past years
We registered an increasing level of Europeanization, students’ civic
engagement, responsible citizenship and inclusion.
We discovered a higher level of digitalization, innovative practice,
active methods and higher level of participation in the community.
The Europeanization impact on our school curricula, level of positive
school climate, intercultural approach and lifelong learning
has increased .
Social cohesion among teachers is mostly at a lower level after the
project than before. Maybe this is because all were very excited to
start a project and this evaluation was just after the end of the
project.
Project evaluation from teachers in all the participating countries
Part of the evaluations:

4. The parents’ evaluation of the three past years
The parents’ general overview is that the level of Europeanization, responsible citizenship and children's participation in the community
has increased over the past three years during this project. Some more than others. The Italian school has almost the same level as
before and maybe this is because it is already an Erasmus+ project skilled organisation. Bulgaria is a new school in Erasmus+ project
and they have a significant development of this level.
The parents’ thoughts about children's’ use of digital applications for learning in school has increased in all the countries except in
Norway. In Norway they have a high level of using digital applications from before.
Most parents think the school uses more active methods than before the project, except in Italy. The Italian school is already at a high
level.
We discover that they think it is a higher level of inclusion in the classes and more positive climate at school.
The level of intercultural approach has increased in all countries, but significant in Norway and Bulgaria. Maybe it is because they are
not in the centre of Europe and they do not have many nationalities in their schools.
The school with the most impact seems to be the school with less experience in Erasmus+, the Bulgarian school.
Project evaluation from parents in all the participating countries

5. The students’ evaluation of the three past years
The majority of the students participating in WIB,use webtools
connecting to WIB and work in groups with classmates 2-5 times
per month.
They work with international groups 2 or more than 4 times per
year.
The majority of the students have perceived that we have carried
out ⅘ - 6 service learning activities.
The students feel involved in the project .On a scale from 1-10,(10
is completely) about 90% answers from 5 -10.
They also feel they have improved their English- and ICT skills
while working on WIB. There are differences between countries.
On a scale from 1-10,(10 is a huge improvement)100% of the
Bulgarian students answer 10 and from all the other countries
about 90% of the answers were from 5 -10.
Service learning (SL) has a positive influence on the students.
They feel SL have an impact on the community, they feel useful
and better during SL. 90% feel they are an active positive part of
the community after the project.
About 90% feel part of the European community.
The majority of the students think they have learned about
different beauties, 95% answer from 5-10 on a scale from 1 - 10
(10 is “I loved it”) .
About 99% of the students will recommend similar projects to
others and they will take part in another Erasmus Project.
Project evaluation from students in all the participating countries

6. Summary of the evaluations of our LTT
meetings
We used Google forms to evaluate our meetings (LTT), both with
students and teachers involved.
The meeting evaluation for each meeting (LTT) was the same form:

7. Students LTT meeting evaluation
In general all the students meant the agenda for the meeting was clear og very
clear.
The students' responses of the agenda were very positive, such as amazing,
enriching, fantastic, top and fun.
Mostly they find that the time fits the activities.
More than 60% have learned many new things, some say yes and a very few say
a few.
All the students say they have met new friends, most of them many.
Students meeting evaluation

8. The organisation and the school hospitality have been satisfactory.
The accommodation has been adequate.
Most of the students think that it has been good or very good social harmony
among students.
All of them say that the extra school activities has been enriching or very
enriching.
How they feel about the meeting from 1 - 10, 10 is excellent, they say from 8 - 10.

9. The teachers’ meeting evaluation:
The agenda was clear, and the comments were very clear, useful, well organized,well planned and
meaningful.
The proposed goals have mostly been reached. Only the weather has forced us to change the program a
little in one meeting.
The time has fitted the program and all have learned new things and will apply them at school.
The organisation, the hospitality and the accommodation have been good in all the meetings.
The social harmony among partners has been good and we have had good discussions.
The communication among partners before the meetings has always been good and clear.
The extra school activities have been enriching and very enriching.
The global rating of the meetings has been, from 1- 10
(10 = excellent), 9 and 10.
Teachers' meeting evaluation