Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
Similar to Building the agile house
Similar to Building the agile house (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Building the agile house
- 1. By Rakesh Singh (Agile Coach) Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com
- 2. Mindset and Systems thinking. Mindset Systems thinking Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com
- 3. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com The Choice!
- 4. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com ABC of life!
- 8. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com Power of the Mindset! Power is not given to you. You have to take it!
- 9. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com The milkshake Experiment
- 10. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com Mind over Medicine. WYSIWYG
- 11. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com Mind over matter: Exercise & weight loss.
- 12. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com The Rat experiment! Hawthorne effect! The Leader’s impact!
- 13. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com Agile Onion
- 14. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com Different kinds of mindset Fixed Scarcity [Red Ocean] Pessimistic Competitive Growth Abundance [Blue Ocean] Optimistic Collaborative
- 15. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com How a mindset works with: Challenges Obstacles Efforts Criticism Others success Ability Goal Failure Stress Pause and reflect: Do we embrace risks, challenges, uncertainty? How we respond in a VUCAn environment? How do we handle feedback, failure? Do we value effort or intelligence?
- 16. January 28, 1986! Disaster waiting to happen!
- 18. Launch unless you can prove it is unsafe Rather than Typical principle of “safety first.”
- 20. “You know, there is nothing we can do about damage to the TPS [Thermal Protection System]. If it has been damaged it's probably better not to know. I think the crew would rather not know. Don't you think it would be better for them to have a happy successful flight and die unexpectedly during entry than to stay on orbit, knowing that there was nothing to be done, until the air ran out?”
- 21. They could have been saved!!!!
- 22. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com The London underground fire 1987. Disaster waiting to happen! Fixed Mindset at play! Structure influences behavior!
- 23. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com Challenges Turf wars Poor communication Fixed way of doing. Fixed mindset. Structures influencing behavior for the worse! It worked until it did not and when it did not it caused a calamity! No fail safes. Had multiple prognosis.
- 24. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com What we learn? Improve communication Need generalists [cross functional teams] Common purpose Problems often reside within the processes and structures.
- 25. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com
- 26. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com Thank You!!
- 27. Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com
- 28. Please reach out to us on: Contact@ScaleUpConsultants.com www.ScaleUpConsultants.com https://www.linkedin.com/company/scale-up https://twitter.com/ScaleUpPune https://www.facebook.com/ScaleUpConsultants https://plus.google.com/117837859519308773805/posts https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoCca2D-Wyof3fbS6vIdjRg/playlists Pune Agile Unconference 2018 www.PuneAgileUnConference.com © 2014-18, Scale Up Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. www.ScaleUpConsultants.com
Editor's Notes
- Psychological wellbeing: Not a state which ducks challenges. It includes the optimism that allows you to set your sights on a worthwhile goal and work towards it without any guarantee of success. What is culture? Empowerment? Trust. Conflict. Collaboration. Intregrity?
- Power of visualization. Incremental improvements, appreciations.
- 1. Diet fads. Go back to older fatter self! Apply anology to agile if just have tools and practices. Loose the trust and the backslide is much worse!
- Out of 24 tests, 7 failed. The data team went ahead with was 17 tests had passed. What was conspicuous but ignored: all the 7 tests that failed had one common thing: Extremely low temperature (on the days of failure the temperature was very low). We look for what we want to look at. While filtering is a great aid it may have consequence. How presentations can influence decisions. Why voicing concerns actively, assertively, continuously sometimes can be critical. NASA manager Jud Lovingood responded that Thiokol could not make the recommendation without providing a safe temperature. Thiokol management disregarded its own engineers' warnings and now recommended that the launch proceed as scheduled; NASA did not ask why. Ebeling told his wife that night that Challenger would blow up. "[W]e're only qualified to 40 degrees ...'what business does anyone even have thinking about 18 degrees, we're in no-man's land.’” "For a successful technology," he concluded, "reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.“ NASA manager Jud Lovingood responded that Thiokol could not make the recommendation without providing a safe temperature. One argument by NASA personnel contesting Thiokol's concerns was that if the primary O-ring failed, the secondary O-ring would still seal. This was unproven, and was in any case an argument that did not apply to a "Criticality 1" component. As astronaut Sally Ride stated when questioning NASA managers before the Rogers Commission, it is forbidden to rely on a backup for a "Criticality 1" component. The booster's casing had ballooned under the stress of ignition. As a result of this ballooning, the metal parts of the casing bent away from each other, opening a gap through which hot gases—above 2,760 °C (5,000 °F)—leaked. This had occurred in previous launches, but each time the primary O-ring had shifted out of its groove and formed a seal. Although the SRB was not designed to function this way, it appeared to work well enough, and Morton-Thiokol changed the design specs to accommodate this process, known as extrusion. On the morning of the disaster, the primary O-ring had become so hard due to the cold that it could not seal in time. Above the glass transition temperature, the O-rings display properties of elasticity and flexibility, while below the glass transition temperature, they become rigid and brittle. that "the causes of the institutional failure responsible for Challenger have not been fixed," saying that the same "flawed decision making process" that had resulted in the Challenger accident was responsible for Columbia's destruction seventeen years later.[80] Boisjoly argues that his superiors were focused on pleasing their client, NASA. This focus prompted an underlying default of “launch unless you can prove it is unsafe,” rather than the typical principle of “safety first.”
- Foam shedding. All earlier affected shuttle missions completed successfully. Like challenger ignored. Normalization of deviance.
- Atlantis If there was information sharing. If…..