SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
Rachel Arnold, Curtis E. Phills, Jennifer Wolff, Amanda Williams
Capital University, University of Northern Florida, University of Northern Florida, Sheffield-Hallam University
Abstract
Research has shown Black women are considered less prototypical of
Blacks than Black men. This often results in Black women having their
experiences disregarded (Schud, Alt & Klauer, 2015). We hypothesized
that stereotypes about Black women should be more weakly related to
attitudes toward Blacks in general than stereotypes about Black men.
We conducted two studies, one with an American sample and one with a
British sample, to test this prediction. In both studies, we measured
attitudes by asking participants to indicate how warm or favorable they
felt toward target groups. Stereotyping was assessed via a stereotype-
listing task. Data from both the American and British studies supported
our hypotheses in that when both stereotypes about Black men and
women were simultaneously entered into a linear regression to predict
explicit prejudice, only explicit stereotyping of Black men was a
significant predictor of explicit prejudice
Background
•  Research shows stereotypes about race include a gendered
component which causes most racial or ethnic groups to be
categorized as either more masculine or feminine (Carpinella et al,
2013; Schug, Alt, & Klauer, 2015; Thomas et al., 2014)
•  In North American culture, Blacks tend to be seen as a more
masculine racial group (Goff, Thomas, & Jackson, 2008; Johnson,
Freeman, & Pauker, 2012)
•  This manifests in research as Black women being seen as not
prototypically Black
•  It has been suggested that this causes a degree of “invisibility”
for Black women compared to white individuals and Black men
Research Question
Are stereotypes and attitudes about Black people more weakly related
to Black women compared to Black men?
Hypothesis
Black women aren’t considered prototypical of Black people and therefore,
attitudes and stereotypes about Black women should be more weakly related
to attitudes and stereotypes of Black people than attitudes and stereotypes
about Black men.
Study One
Participants
•  N = 68 (all non-Black)
•  4 male, 64 female, 0 trans
•  Mage = 21.79, SDage = 3.78
Materials
•  Stereotype Listing task (Essses & Zanna, 1990): participants were
instructed to type as many (at least one) stereotypes as possible about
a social group
•  Stereotype Strength task: Participants indicated how strongly society
associated their generated stereotypes with the corresponding social
groups using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 9
•  Stereotype Valence task: participants rated how positive or negative
each stereotype was on a Likert scale from 1 to 7
•  Evaluation Thermometers: participants were asked to indicate how
“warm or cold” they feel towards each of the social groups presented
during the stereotyping tasks
•  Men and women were the first groups presented with Black men and
Black women being presented second
Procedure
•  After logging onto experiment website and providing informed consent,
participants completed a series of tasks to assess stereotyping and
attitudes towards Blacks and whites
Results
•  Regression: Explicit prejudice predicted by stereotyping against Black men
and Black women
•  Black men: B = .24, p = .07
•  Black women: B = .01, p = .93
Study Two
Participants
•  N = 77 (all non-Black)
•  10 male, 51 female, 16 did not respond
•  Mage = 19.36, SDage = 2.53
Materials
Participants completed the same Stereotype Listing, Stereotype
Strength and Stereotype Valence tasks used in study one with the
following differences
•  Participants were asked about the stereotypes of the men and
women in each social group as well as the group as a whole
•  Participants were asked to list stereotypes about whites from the UK
•  Social groups were presented in random order
•  For the Stereotype Strength questions, strength was assessed on a
scale from 1 to 7 rather than 1 to 9
•  Participants were not required to list at least one stereotype for each
group
Results
Regression: Explicit prejudice predicted by stereotype against Black
men and Black women
•  Black men: B = -.22, p = .09
•  Black women: B = -.06, p = .63
Discussion
•  Our hypothesis in regards to implicit prejudice was supported by the
American data but not the British data – explicit attitudes to Black men
were better predictors of implicit prejudice than explicit attitudes to
Black women
•  Our hypothesis regarding explicit prejudice was supported by both the
American and the British data. Explicit stereotyping of Black men is a
better predictor of explicit prejudice than explicit stereotyping of Black
women.
The Invisibility of Stereotypes about Black Women
rarnold@capital.edu

More Related Content

What's hot

The Experiences of Transgender & Cisgender Individuals in Oxford House Addict...
The Experiences of Transgender & Cisgender Individuals in Oxford House Addict...The Experiences of Transgender & Cisgender Individuals in Oxford House Addict...
The Experiences of Transgender & Cisgender Individuals in Oxford House Addict...Christopher Beasley
 
Gender based social reactions powerpoint
Gender based social reactions powerpointGender based social reactions powerpoint
Gender based social reactions powerpointBethannie216
 
The Sexual Double Standard
The Sexual Double StandardThe Sexual Double Standard
The Sexual Double Standardashleyngarrison
 
Gender differences
Gender differencesGender differences
Gender differencesClarissa Bol
 
Trans MST APA 2015 Slides
Trans MST APA 2015 SlidesTrans MST APA 2015 Slides
Trans MST APA 2015 SlidesAaron Samuel
 
The Prevalence of Medically Assisted Treatment and of Associated Attitudes in...
The Prevalence of Medically Assisted Treatment and of Associated Attitudes in...The Prevalence of Medically Assisted Treatment and of Associated Attitudes in...
The Prevalence of Medically Assisted Treatment and of Associated Attitudes in...Christopher Beasley
 
Gendered Ethics
Gendered EthicsGendered Ethics
Gendered Ethicstamyd78
 
Aggression AQA A2 Psychology Paper 3
Aggression AQA A2 Psychology Paper 3Aggression AQA A2 Psychology Paper 3
Aggression AQA A2 Psychology Paper 3Haley Ho
 
Implicit bias, MCB Diversity and Inclusion Luncheon
Implicit bias, MCB Diversity and Inclusion LuncheonImplicit bias, MCB Diversity and Inclusion Luncheon
Implicit bias, MCB Diversity and Inclusion LuncheonMegha Majumder
 
21 elmer eddynov1
21 elmer eddynov121 elmer eddynov1
21 elmer eddynov1CBRC
 
What do we_know_about_sexual_abuse
What do we_know_about_sexual_abuseWhat do we_know_about_sexual_abuse
What do we_know_about_sexual_abuseKaterina Kolnogorova
 
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilities (Ruseanu Georgiana; Necula Alexandra)
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilities (Ruseanu Georgiana; Necula Alexandra)Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilities (Ruseanu Georgiana; Necula Alexandra)
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilities (Ruseanu Georgiana; Necula Alexandra)Remus Teodorescu
 
Kinsey report 2003
Kinsey report 2003Kinsey report 2003
Kinsey report 2003Lea Uva
 
We Are Not Born This Way Symposium Talk
We Are Not Born This Way Symposium TalkWe Are Not Born This Way Symposium Talk
We Are Not Born This Way Symposium TalkLaMar Gibson
 
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilities
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilitiesWomen’s vs. men’s leadership abilities
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilitiesCristina Mihalache
 

What's hot (19)

A Typology of Homeless Youth
A Typology of Homeless YouthA Typology of Homeless Youth
A Typology of Homeless Youth
 
The Experiences of Transgender & Cisgender Individuals in Oxford House Addict...
The Experiences of Transgender & Cisgender Individuals in Oxford House Addict...The Experiences of Transgender & Cisgender Individuals in Oxford House Addict...
The Experiences of Transgender & Cisgender Individuals in Oxford House Addict...
 
Womenu2019s vs
Womenu2019s vsWomenu2019s vs
Womenu2019s vs
 
Gender based social reactions powerpoint
Gender based social reactions powerpointGender based social reactions powerpoint
Gender based social reactions powerpoint
 
The Sexual Double Standard
The Sexual Double StandardThe Sexual Double Standard
The Sexual Double Standard
 
Gender differences
Gender differencesGender differences
Gender differences
 
Trans MST APA 2015 Slides
Trans MST APA 2015 SlidesTrans MST APA 2015 Slides
Trans MST APA 2015 Slides
 
The Prevalence of Medically Assisted Treatment and of Associated Attitudes in...
The Prevalence of Medically Assisted Treatment and of Associated Attitudes in...The Prevalence of Medically Assisted Treatment and of Associated Attitudes in...
The Prevalence of Medically Assisted Treatment and of Associated Attitudes in...
 
Gendered Ethics
Gendered EthicsGendered Ethics
Gendered Ethics
 
Aggression AQA A2 Psychology Paper 3
Aggression AQA A2 Psychology Paper 3Aggression AQA A2 Psychology Paper 3
Aggression AQA A2 Psychology Paper 3
 
Womenu2019s vs (1)
Womenu2019s vs (1)Womenu2019s vs (1)
Womenu2019s vs (1)
 
Implicit bias, MCB Diversity and Inclusion Luncheon
Implicit bias, MCB Diversity and Inclusion LuncheonImplicit bias, MCB Diversity and Inclusion Luncheon
Implicit bias, MCB Diversity and Inclusion Luncheon
 
21 elmer eddynov1
21 elmer eddynov121 elmer eddynov1
21 elmer eddynov1
 
Sarah A. APS PPT
Sarah A. APS PPTSarah A. APS PPT
Sarah A. APS PPT
 
What do we_know_about_sexual_abuse
What do we_know_about_sexual_abuseWhat do we_know_about_sexual_abuse
What do we_know_about_sexual_abuse
 
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilities (Ruseanu Georgiana; Necula Alexandra)
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilities (Ruseanu Georgiana; Necula Alexandra)Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilities (Ruseanu Georgiana; Necula Alexandra)
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilities (Ruseanu Georgiana; Necula Alexandra)
 
Kinsey report 2003
Kinsey report 2003Kinsey report 2003
Kinsey report 2003
 
We Are Not Born This Way Symposium Talk
We Are Not Born This Way Symposium TalkWe Are Not Born This Way Symposium Talk
We Are Not Born This Way Symposium Talk
 
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilities
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilitiesWomen’s vs. men’s leadership abilities
Women’s vs. men’s leadership abilities
 

Viewers also liked

Amanda Williams - Commercial application of reducing semen concentration per ...
Amanda Williams - Commercial application of reducing semen concentration per ...Amanda Williams - Commercial application of reducing semen concentration per ...
Amanda Williams - Commercial application of reducing semen concentration per ...John Blue
 
Bases de datos distribuidas
Bases de datos distribuidasBases de datos distribuidas
Bases de datos distribuidasrobertojimenes
 
Texas S Ta R Chart
Texas S Ta R ChartTexas S Ta R Chart
Texas S Ta R Chartamandahope79
 
Boletin novidades da_biblioteca_da_deputacion_da_coruna. maio2016
Boletin novidades da_biblioteca_da_deputacion_da_coruna. maio2016Boletin novidades da_biblioteca_da_deputacion_da_coruna. maio2016
Boletin novidades da_biblioteca_da_deputacion_da_coruna. maio2016Bibliotecadicoruna
 
Certificado Intel VM
Certificado Intel VMCertificado Intel VM
Certificado Intel VMCarlos Alonzo
 
religion-syllabus-summer2016
religion-syllabus-summer2016religion-syllabus-summer2016
religion-syllabus-summer2016Michael W. Ossman
 
Spring Fling: Day 1 Intro
Spring Fling: Day 1 IntroSpring Fling: Day 1 Intro
Spring Fling: Day 1 IntroHealth 2.0
 
Certificate PRINCE 2 Foundation
Certificate PRINCE 2 FoundationCertificate PRINCE 2 Foundation
Certificate PRINCE 2 FoundationJonas Smulders
 
Company Brochure_OnlineperPage
Company Brochure_OnlineperPageCompany Brochure_OnlineperPage
Company Brochure_OnlineperPageShaun Hadkinson
 
Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2
Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2
Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2abdulrehmanali
 
Elephant & Blind Men_b
Elephant & Blind Men_bElephant & Blind Men_b
Elephant & Blind Men_bO.L. Laurence
 
William Shakespeare (biography)
William Shakespeare (biography)William Shakespeare (biography)
William Shakespeare (biography)brookems2929
 
William Shakespeare powerpoint
William Shakespeare powerpointWilliam Shakespeare powerpoint
William Shakespeare powerpointcaromeo
 

Viewers also liked (18)

Amanda Williams - Commercial application of reducing semen concentration per ...
Amanda Williams - Commercial application of reducing semen concentration per ...Amanda Williams - Commercial application of reducing semen concentration per ...
Amanda Williams - Commercial application of reducing semen concentration per ...
 
Bases de datos distribuidas
Bases de datos distribuidasBases de datos distribuidas
Bases de datos distribuidas
 
Texas S Ta R Chart
Texas S Ta R ChartTexas S Ta R Chart
Texas S Ta R Chart
 
Amanda Williams CV 2016
Amanda Williams CV 2016Amanda Williams CV 2016
Amanda Williams CV 2016
 
Boletin novidades da_biblioteca_da_deputacion_da_coruna. maio2016
Boletin novidades da_biblioteca_da_deputacion_da_coruna. maio2016Boletin novidades da_biblioteca_da_deputacion_da_coruna. maio2016
Boletin novidades da_biblioteca_da_deputacion_da_coruna. maio2016
 
Kristine
KristineKristine
Kristine
 
Certificado Intel VM
Certificado Intel VMCertificado Intel VM
Certificado Intel VM
 
religion-syllabus-summer2016
religion-syllabus-summer2016religion-syllabus-summer2016
religion-syllabus-summer2016
 
Spring Fling: Day 1 Intro
Spring Fling: Day 1 IntroSpring Fling: Day 1 Intro
Spring Fling: Day 1 Intro
 
Mi comunidad
Mi comunidadMi comunidad
Mi comunidad
 
Certificate PRINCE 2 Foundation
Certificate PRINCE 2 FoundationCertificate PRINCE 2 Foundation
Certificate PRINCE 2 Foundation
 
Company Brochure_OnlineperPage
Company Brochure_OnlineperPageCompany Brochure_OnlineperPage
Company Brochure_OnlineperPage
 
Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2
Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2
Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2
 
Elephant & Blind Men_b
Elephant & Blind Men_bElephant & Blind Men_b
Elephant & Blind Men_b
 
Subject verb agreement
Subject verb agreementSubject verb agreement
Subject verb agreement
 
William Shakespeare (biography)
William Shakespeare (biography)William Shakespeare (biography)
William Shakespeare (biography)
 
William Shakespeare powerpoint
William Shakespeare powerpointWilliam Shakespeare powerpoint
William Shakespeare powerpoint
 
Build Features, Not Apps
Build Features, Not AppsBuild Features, Not Apps
Build Features, Not Apps
 

Similar to SPSP poster

Psych Paper Final
Psych Paper FinalPsych Paper Final
Psych Paper FinalSarah Jones
 
Reactions to Asexuality by Bibi Loizzo
Reactions to Asexuality by Bibi LoizzoReactions to Asexuality by Bibi Loizzo
Reactions to Asexuality by Bibi LoizzoBibi Loizzo
 
242Poster-SpanglerWoodardAlshaibani.ppt
242Poster-SpanglerWoodardAlshaibani.ppt242Poster-SpanglerWoodardAlshaibani.ppt
242Poster-SpanglerWoodardAlshaibani.pptShailee Woodard
 
Conformity asch line experiments
Conformity asch line experimentsConformity asch line experiments
Conformity asch line experimentsmpape
 
make the box fit the word pleaseI want t.docx
make the box fit the word pleaseI want t.docxmake the box fit the word pleaseI want t.docx
make the box fit the word pleaseI want t.docxsmile790243
 
Study: Discrimination in Topeka, 2002
Study: Discrimination in Topeka, 2002Study: Discrimination in Topeka, 2002
Study: Discrimination in Topeka, 2002Travis Barnhart
 
Social Psych- Social Cognition Group Project(2)-2
Social Psych- Social Cognition Group Project(2)-2Social Psych- Social Cognition Group Project(2)-2
Social Psych- Social Cognition Group Project(2)-2Bethany Watson
 
C:\Fakepath\Research Project Power Point
C:\Fakepath\Research Project Power PointC:\Fakepath\Research Project Power Point
C:\Fakepath\Research Project Power Pointguest1381ffe
 
Research project power point
Research project power pointResearch project power point
Research project power pointafonderwhite
 
Mostly Straight_CatalystCon East 2014
Mostly Straight_CatalystCon East 2014Mostly Straight_CatalystCon East 2014
Mostly Straight_CatalystCon East 2014Zhana Vrangalova
 
Psychology Research Methods - Final Research Paper
Psychology Research Methods - Final Research PaperPsychology Research Methods - Final Research Paper
Psychology Research Methods - Final Research PaperSaumya Sudhir
 
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 213 prejudice ch 13
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 213 prejudice ch 13Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 213 prejudice ch 13
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 213 prejudice ch 13John Bradford
 
Status of transgender in india by sameer kumar jena
Status of transgender in india by sameer kumar jenaStatus of transgender in india by sameer kumar jena
Status of transgender in india by sameer kumar jenasameer kumar
 
PSY 331 Presentation Slides Abyana
PSY 331 Presentation Slides AbyanaPSY 331 Presentation Slides Abyana
PSY 331 Presentation Slides AbyanaNurulAbyana
 
The demographics of religious and spiritual struggles in the USA
The demographics of religious and spiritual struggles in the USAThe demographics of religious and spiritual struggles in the USA
The demographics of religious and spiritual struggles in the USANick Stauner
 
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 211 ch 10 11 race gender
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 211 ch 10 11 race genderBradford mvsu fall 2012 so 211 ch 10 11 race gender
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 211 ch 10 11 race genderJohn Bradford
 
Senior thesis Final paper
Senior thesis Final paperSenior thesis Final paper
Senior thesis Final paperTyler Presjak
 

Similar to SPSP poster (20)

Psych Paper Final
Psych Paper FinalPsych Paper Final
Psych Paper Final
 
Reactions to Asexuality by Bibi Loizzo
Reactions to Asexuality by Bibi LoizzoReactions to Asexuality by Bibi Loizzo
Reactions to Asexuality by Bibi Loizzo
 
242Poster-SpanglerWoodardAlshaibani.ppt
242Poster-SpanglerWoodardAlshaibani.ppt242Poster-SpanglerWoodardAlshaibani.ppt
242Poster-SpanglerWoodardAlshaibani.ppt
 
Conformity asch line experiments
Conformity asch line experimentsConformity asch line experiments
Conformity asch line experiments
 
make the box fit the word pleaseI want t.docx
make the box fit the word pleaseI want t.docxmake the box fit the word pleaseI want t.docx
make the box fit the word pleaseI want t.docx
 
Study: Discrimination in Topeka, 2002
Study: Discrimination in Topeka, 2002Study: Discrimination in Topeka, 2002
Study: Discrimination in Topeka, 2002
 
Social Psych- Social Cognition Group Project(2)-2
Social Psych- Social Cognition Group Project(2)-2Social Psych- Social Cognition Group Project(2)-2
Social Psych- Social Cognition Group Project(2)-2
 
SSSS 2016 Phoenix AZ 1 pdf
SSSS 2016 Phoenix AZ 1 pdfSSSS 2016 Phoenix AZ 1 pdf
SSSS 2016 Phoenix AZ 1 pdf
 
C:\Fakepath\Research Project Power Point
C:\Fakepath\Research Project Power PointC:\Fakepath\Research Project Power Point
C:\Fakepath\Research Project Power Point
 
Research project power point
Research project power pointResearch project power point
Research project power point
 
Mostly Straight_CatalystCon East 2014
Mostly Straight_CatalystCon East 2014Mostly Straight_CatalystCon East 2014
Mostly Straight_CatalystCon East 2014
 
Psychology Research Methods - Final Research Paper
Psychology Research Methods - Final Research PaperPsychology Research Methods - Final Research Paper
Psychology Research Methods - Final Research Paper
 
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 213 prejudice ch 13
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 213 prejudice ch 13Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 213 prejudice ch 13
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 213 prejudice ch 13
 
SEPA Poster (2)
SEPA Poster (2)SEPA Poster (2)
SEPA Poster (2)
 
Status of transgender in india by sameer kumar jena
Status of transgender in india by sameer kumar jenaStatus of transgender in india by sameer kumar jena
Status of transgender in india by sameer kumar jena
 
PSY 331 Presentation Slides Abyana
PSY 331 Presentation Slides AbyanaPSY 331 Presentation Slides Abyana
PSY 331 Presentation Slides Abyana
 
The demographics of religious and spiritual struggles in the USA
The demographics of religious and spiritual struggles in the USAThe demographics of religious and spiritual struggles in the USA
The demographics of religious and spiritual struggles in the USA
 
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 211 ch 10 11 race gender
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 211 ch 10 11 race genderBradford mvsu fall 2012 so 211 ch 10 11 race gender
Bradford mvsu fall 2012 so 211 ch 10 11 race gender
 
Senior thesis Final paper
Senior thesis Final paperSenior thesis Final paper
Senior thesis Final paper
 
IAT Poster
IAT PosterIAT Poster
IAT Poster
 

SPSP poster

  • 1. Rachel Arnold, Curtis E. Phills, Jennifer Wolff, Amanda Williams Capital University, University of Northern Florida, University of Northern Florida, Sheffield-Hallam University Abstract Research has shown Black women are considered less prototypical of Blacks than Black men. This often results in Black women having their experiences disregarded (Schud, Alt & Klauer, 2015). We hypothesized that stereotypes about Black women should be more weakly related to attitudes toward Blacks in general than stereotypes about Black men. We conducted two studies, one with an American sample and one with a British sample, to test this prediction. In both studies, we measured attitudes by asking participants to indicate how warm or favorable they felt toward target groups. Stereotyping was assessed via a stereotype- listing task. Data from both the American and British studies supported our hypotheses in that when both stereotypes about Black men and women were simultaneously entered into a linear regression to predict explicit prejudice, only explicit stereotyping of Black men was a significant predictor of explicit prejudice Background •  Research shows stereotypes about race include a gendered component which causes most racial or ethnic groups to be categorized as either more masculine or feminine (Carpinella et al, 2013; Schug, Alt, & Klauer, 2015; Thomas et al., 2014) •  In North American culture, Blacks tend to be seen as a more masculine racial group (Goff, Thomas, & Jackson, 2008; Johnson, Freeman, & Pauker, 2012) •  This manifests in research as Black women being seen as not prototypically Black •  It has been suggested that this causes a degree of “invisibility” for Black women compared to white individuals and Black men Research Question Are stereotypes and attitudes about Black people more weakly related to Black women compared to Black men? Hypothesis Black women aren’t considered prototypical of Black people and therefore, attitudes and stereotypes about Black women should be more weakly related to attitudes and stereotypes of Black people than attitudes and stereotypes about Black men. Study One Participants •  N = 68 (all non-Black) •  4 male, 64 female, 0 trans •  Mage = 21.79, SDage = 3.78 Materials •  Stereotype Listing task (Essses & Zanna, 1990): participants were instructed to type as many (at least one) stereotypes as possible about a social group •  Stereotype Strength task: Participants indicated how strongly society associated their generated stereotypes with the corresponding social groups using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 9 •  Stereotype Valence task: participants rated how positive or negative each stereotype was on a Likert scale from 1 to 7 •  Evaluation Thermometers: participants were asked to indicate how “warm or cold” they feel towards each of the social groups presented during the stereotyping tasks •  Men and women were the first groups presented with Black men and Black women being presented second Procedure •  After logging onto experiment website and providing informed consent, participants completed a series of tasks to assess stereotyping and attitudes towards Blacks and whites Results •  Regression: Explicit prejudice predicted by stereotyping against Black men and Black women •  Black men: B = .24, p = .07 •  Black women: B = .01, p = .93 Study Two Participants •  N = 77 (all non-Black) •  10 male, 51 female, 16 did not respond •  Mage = 19.36, SDage = 2.53 Materials Participants completed the same Stereotype Listing, Stereotype Strength and Stereotype Valence tasks used in study one with the following differences •  Participants were asked about the stereotypes of the men and women in each social group as well as the group as a whole •  Participants were asked to list stereotypes about whites from the UK •  Social groups were presented in random order •  For the Stereotype Strength questions, strength was assessed on a scale from 1 to 7 rather than 1 to 9 •  Participants were not required to list at least one stereotype for each group Results Regression: Explicit prejudice predicted by stereotype against Black men and Black women •  Black men: B = -.22, p = .09 •  Black women: B = -.06, p = .63 Discussion •  Our hypothesis in regards to implicit prejudice was supported by the American data but not the British data – explicit attitudes to Black men were better predictors of implicit prejudice than explicit attitudes to Black women •  Our hypothesis regarding explicit prejudice was supported by both the American and the British data. Explicit stereotyping of Black men is a better predictor of explicit prejudice than explicit stereotyping of Black women. The Invisibility of Stereotypes about Black Women rarnold@capital.edu